<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>V3N1 (Oct 1999) &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/category/articles/articles-by-issue-articles/v3/v3n1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Guns of Ryan: ‘Defense of Freedom and The Sounds of Bethlehem’</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-guns-of-ryan-defense-of-freedom-and-the-sounds-of-bethlehem-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Cartledge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 1999 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Cartledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=16702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This writer’s father and this writer recently began a series of articles for SAR. The series focuses on the World War II gun work by the Apache Regiment of the 101st Airborne. I immediately contacted writer and researcher Mark Bando. Mark informed this writer of the then new film ‘Saving Private Ryan’ from Dream Works/Paramount directed by Steven Spielberg. This writer’s father and the soldier on whom the film is loosely based served in the same regiment. They both jumped into Normandy with the 101st’s Apache Regiment — the 501 of Col. Howard Johnson.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Rick Cartledge</p>



<p>This writer’s father and this writer recently began a series of articles for SAR. The series focuses on the World War II gun work by the Apache Regiment of the 101st Airborne. I immediately contacted writer and researcher Mark Bando. Mark informed this writer of the then new film ‘Saving Private Ryan’ from Dream Works/Paramount directed by Steven Spielberg. This writer’s father and the soldier on whom the film is loosely based served in the same regiment. They both jumped into Normandy with the 101st’s Apache Regiment — the 501 of Col. Howard Johnson.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-large is-resized"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="476" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-64.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16709" style="width:580px;height:853px" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-64.jpg 476w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-64-204x300.jpg 204w" sizes="(max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Tom Hanks with his Thompson SMG in Saving Private Ryan. <br><em>Photo by David James courtesy of Dreamworks, LLC &amp; Paramount Pictures.</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>I contacted Dream Works for additional information. The Dream Works/Paramount staff, provided very professional and enthusiastic assistance. Ms. Stephanie Watson, Mr. Spielberg’s Atlanta representative, kindly extended an invitation to my father and I to attend the sneak preview of ‘Saving Private Ryan’. On the appointed day we picked up Mike Thacker and motored to Phipps Plaza in Buckhead.</p>



<p>My father, Mike Thacker, and I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. During our homeward drive, I asked my father if he thought that the film accurately and faithfully portrayed the men with whom he served. He commented that it did credit to both the Airborne troopers and the Rangers, although he did not expect the actors to be in the same physical condition as Johnson’s Boys. My father felt that all of the actors had given very credible performances. He stated, ‘Though it may difficult to watch, I recommend viewing ‘Saving Private Ryan’ to all Americans over age 18. It is probably as close as Hollywood will come to war. War is not a parlor game. This film shows as well as Hollywood can what our generation did to insure the freedoms that we all enjoy today.’</p>



<p>As we motored southward, Mike commented that a prominent belt of 30 cal didn’t have primers. I laughed and said that we were probably the only three people in the theater that caught that. Mike’s statement brought us to the subject of the guns. Though very loud for a theater, we all knew that the real guns sound much louder than what we had heard. I then said that whoever drove those guns was very good. The steel sounded real. The motion picture soundtrack sounded as if someone had placed a microphone about 300 yards down the Knob Creek Range. The sounds reminded me of the old days when we had open lines on Thursday. You stepped to a position and, to use a 60’s drag race phrase, ‘run what you brung’.</p>



<p>The armed citizen and his history played an important off camera roll in this magnificent film. Mr. Steven Spielberg operates under the First Ammendment. For some elements of ‘Saving Private Ryan’ Mr. Spielberg requested assistance from those who operate under the Second Ammendment. For some of the history and the story of this, read on. In the fullness of time, I would learn just how close I was to the truth about the soundtrack to ‘Saving Private Ryan’.</p>



<p><strong>Not Just A Southern Tradition</strong></p>



<p>To better understand what will follow, a bit of family and unrevised American history presents itself. The Spaniards first brought gun craft to an eastern American settlement with the founding of St. Augustine. The Spaniards later withdrew leaving an extant settlement. Christopher Burroughs, ancestor of this writer, joined the Jamestown Colony in 1608. The Saints occupied half the Mayflower when it wandered onto Plymouth rock at a later date. Shooting for sport, food, and self defense started in the South and became a Southern tradition. The shooting tradition spread. Shooting and an armed citizenry became two hallmarks of colonial America.</p>



<p>In 1861, George Rockingham Gilmer Cartledge ran away from Boiling Springs Plantation at age 13 and joined the Confederate Army. His little brother Joe, age 11, tagged along. Both finished The War of The Sixties as sergeants. George Cartledge gave his son, my grandfather, a .22 rifle at age six. He gave him a gauge for ever year at twelve. Grandfather did the same for my father. My father did the same for me.</p>



<p>Grandfather and his friend Walraven carried their rifles to school, shooting at targets along the way. Walraven became a legendary shot in Madison County. For years he served in law enforcement around Danielsville, Georgia. Stories recount crooks surrendering in armed conflict when they knew that they faced the guns of Walraven. Grandfather, father, and Walraven continued the tradition of generations. As proof, this writer’s father relates the following boyhood story from the year 1930. Its generational history leads from Old Bob Lee to ‘Saving Private Ryan’.</p>



<p>My father ran out of ammunition on a Saturday morning. To replenish his rifle, he walked from the farm to the general store in Ila, Georgia. Just outside town, he stopped at the blacksmith shop. There, for a while, he watched a distant cousin and his son doing what came naturally on a Saturday afternoon. The son’s years numbered nearly seventy. The old Confederate counted more than ninety summers. These two men engaged in spirited conversation as they sat on a pair of wooden crates outside the forge. They talked as fathers and sons have done in this land since before the Revolution.</p>



<p>Across the narrow road, a saw cut board leaned against an old oak tree. Into the board, the men had tapped a number of forged flat nails. They sunk the nails into the wood just deeply enough to hold them straight. They left the nails’ square heads and most of their shafts exposed. My father stood and watched as the two old men speedily and skillfully loaded four Confederate Colts. They then took turns driving the nails. A penny bet rested on each shot. The son shot magnificently. The old Cavalier gave his son a run for his money. About three cents changed hands.</p>



<p>The father and son had shot in the same rythmic double handed style that John Singleton Mosby raised to an art form at a place called Milford Farm. Those of other climes first viewed this shooting style at a place called Manassas. The two men then reloaded their black powder guns after the white smoke cleared. My father left and went for shells at the general store. As he walked away my father remarked to himself that he would not have wanted to have met that old Cavalier and his friends at that place they called Cold Harbor. In the fullness of time, other men would say the same of my father and his friends at that place that they called Bastogne.</p>



<p>I think of this story whenever I hear the phrase, ‘Form us up again!’. I know what would have happened had Old Bob Lee been able to ride by that blacksmith, stop and say, ‘Men, they need us again in Virginia.’ The old Cavalier would have tuned his pistols plainsman style and stuffed them into his belt. Without a second thought, he would have fallen in behind Traveler. His son wouldn’t have been far behind. Men such as these not only inhabit the South but every other part of this nation. They have answered their country’s call for generations. They will do so again. Mr. Steven Spielberg crafted ‘Saving Private Ryan’ to honor such men. They answered the call in Normandy.</p>



<p>Far from Madison County there exists another relic of Confederate shooting. Last Sunday I held in my hands a very unusual rifle. Made in the Jaegeresque style, it is a heavy barreled yet graceful flintlock conversion — a Kings Mountain type of gun that Stephen Vincent Benet once described in a War Between The States poem. The barrel starts as an octagon and ends round. It mikes to .58 caliber. Fine open sights grace its top. Double set triggers nestle in the brass trigger guard of the cheek plated and brass mounted stock. The lock plate reads ‘Harpers Ferry 1818’. The hammer and percussion cap base give the look of a Richmond conversion. With this rifle on April 12, 1863, Confederate sniper Johnny Lane shot one of James J. Andrews’ spies aboard ‘The General’ during ‘The Great Locomotive Chase’. As to where the rifle is, don’t ask.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1871 — The Defense Of Freedom</h2>



<p>Throughout the history of America we, as America’s citizens, have answered her call to defender her. American shooting, not words or pieces of paper, has defended this nation. Shooting is a skill gained over time, the more practice the better. In every war but one, the Federal Army outshot its enemy. After the War between The States, one Union General said publicly what they all said privately. He stated that a smaller and poorer equipped army had outshot them. That General help found and served as first President of the National Rifle Association. His name was Ambrose Burnside. As a Union General he met members of this writer’s family across battlefields in Virginia. Ulysses Simpson Grant soon followed Gen. Burnside into the Presidency of the NRA. These men helped found America’s oldest civil rights organization to encourage American civilian shooting. Unlike in most other countries, America’s is a civilian army in waiting. The Generals encouraged civilian shooting so that the Federal Army would never be outshot again. They had seen with their own eyes what being outshot costs on a battlefield. Ambrose Burnside remembered Confederate distance shooters to the end of his days. Only 400 such men held off his army and got a bridge named after him in Maryland. One of those shooters was a member of this writer’s family.</p>



<p>The esteemed author Tom Swearengen once remarked, ‘The generation that learned to shoot before 1945 shot better than the generation of today. They knew their guns better and were just better at it.’ Some of us younger ones listened to and learned from that magnificent generation. Those who did found themselves in better stead when they too answered the call. They carried with them the civilian shooting tradition passed to them by each generation from 1871. On June 6, 1944 that pre ’45 generation landed in Normandy in defense of our freedom. They brought with them America’s most valuable hidden resource in time of peril — American civilian shooting. From the beaches named Omaha and Utah, they shot their way to Berlin.</p>



<p>On the morning of June 6, 1944, the German coastal defenders on Utah and Omaha awoke to face the greatest armada ever assembled by mankind. Not withstanding the armada, the Germans on Utah found another considerable problem behind them, the Apache Regiment. Among those troopers stood blood kin to the Army of Northern Virginia. Col. Julian Ewell, 3rd Battalion Commander, was grandson of Gen. Ewell and nephew to JEB Stuart. Frederick ‘Fritz’ Niland, the man on whom Steven Spielberg in part would base his movie, served in Julian Ewell’s Company H. As for this writer’s father, he missed Drop Zone C and landed at Chef du Tont. From there, his Thompson carried on the tradition of the Enfields of Grandfather George and Great Uncle Joe.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For The First Two Ammendments</h2>



<p>Director Steven Spielberg decided to pay tribute to that pre ’45 generation. He chose the script ‘Saving Private Ryan’ and worked with its author in a collaborative effort. After the establishing scenes, the script opens with scenes from the most pivotal day in the 20th century — June 6, 1944. The soldiers coming off the LCI’s weren’t a debating society. They were shooters. In defense of freedom they had come to kill or capture the men who were shooting at them.</p>



<p>As an accomplished director, Steven Spielberg knew how to film ‘Saving Private Ryan’. After much consultation and many ideas, Mr. Spielberg knew the look that he wanted for ‘Saving Private Ryan’. He also knew the sound that he wanted for ‘Ryan’. Sonically, ‘Ryan’ might have suffered in lesser hands. Cheesy stock recordings of Title 2 weapons could have found their way onto the soundtrack. They have done so in many other films.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="454" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-53.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16716" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-53.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-53-300x195.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-53-600x389.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><strong>Kevin Brittingham, Harold Shinn, and Vince Mueller, the shooters for </strong><em><strong>&#8220;Saving Private Ryan&#8221;</strong>. Advanced Armament photo</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Recording the sounds presented Steven Spielberg with no problem. He knew the sounds that he wanted. Mr. Spielberg would use a Hollywood sound crew of the same high caliber that he always had. The difficulty arose in finding someone who could generate those sounds. This proved to require a little more effort than just a trip across town. To generate the sounds that Mr. Spielberg wanted, the sound crew turned to three men who had learned shooting from the World War II generation. These three men carried on the American civilian shooting tradition passed down to them through the generations form 1871. These three also carried on another tradition. They carried on the tradition of Title 2 weapons. However, men such as these couldn’t be found on the outskirts of Hollywood. They lived on the outskirts of Atlanta.</p>



<p>The Title 2 tradition began with two civilian who bought guns in 1898. Theodore Roosevelt accepted the Tiffany family’s generous donation. The first automatic weapons in American ground combat debuted in The War with Spain. Lt. William Tiffany’s family bought two 1895 Colt Automatic Guns for his regiment. The Rough Riders carried them up San Juan Heights (see SAR July 98). For ‘Saving Private Ryan’ only real sounds from real guns would do. For those sounds, Mr. Spielberg’s men came to the Title 2 community. In so doing, Steven Spielberg and his men may have learned something new — not just about us, but about themselves as well.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Check Your Chains at LAX</h2>



<p>One of the finest Title 2 scholars in America lives in California. Though not universally known (and I would hasten to add ‘yet’), his attention to detail enhances the depth of many Title 2 writers. I am but one. Occasionally, he yearns for the type of freedom that in California qualifies as but a faded memory. He buys a ticket at LAX, mounts some silver wings, and flies eastward or southward. When he lands, he spools C and L drums. He then empties them until his heart is content. With his heart replenished he then returns to California and the day job that he loves.</p>



<p>When he began the background work to film ‘Saving Private Ryan’ Steven Spielberg knew the following. Mr. Spielberg knew that many veterans who ‘were by God there’ would view his film. These veterans would know real from unreal. Men and women who came to Normandy by ship or parachute might suspend belief while viewing a comedy. These soldiers would not suspend belief while viewing a motion picture that dealt with them. Steven Spielberg applied his legendary craftsmanship to this film, with attention to the smallest detail. For the veterans who would view ‘Saving Private Ryan’ he wanted it not only to look like Normandy but to sound like Normandy. He wanted scenes that looked not staged but real. He wanted sounds not foley but real.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" width="458" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-56.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16724" style="width:580px;height:886px" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-56.jpg 458w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-56-196x300.jpg 196w" sizes="(max-width: 458px) 100vw, 458px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><strong>Tom Hanks as Capt. John Miller leads the Ranger assault on Omaha Beach.</strong> <em>Courtesy Dream Works/Paramount</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Mr. Spielberg immediately set out to find real guns and real sounds for ‘Saving Private Ryan’. Telephone calls quickly brought home to Dream Works the Title 2 reality. In some things, Californians are not as free as other Americans. Blank firing antiques and replica Title 2s live in California. Real guns don’t.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Thunder of Bethlehem</h2>



<p>To solve his problem, Steven Spielberg turned to his friend George Lucas. Mr. Lucas operates, among other things, Skywalker Sound. Mr. Lucas assigned the Title 2 problem to Shannon Mills. Mr. Mills teamed with Christopher Boyes. Mr. Boyes has not a bad last name when one thinks of Class 3 in World War II. These two consummate professionals list ‘Terminator 2’ and ‘Titanic’ among their many credits. With the roster set, Skywalker Sound evaluated the problem. Then they tackled it.</p>



<p>Shannon Mills concluded that the men that Skywalker sought lived free. These men drove the old guns in the old ways. Mr. Mills reasoned that he could best find free men on Freedom’s Highway — the Internet. Though he did not know which off ramp to take, he knew how to erect a billboard. Shannon Mills booted up his vehicle, shot down the Liberty on ramp, and merged with the traffic. Picking out a likely mile post, he erected his billboard —’Wanted — Real Guns and Gunmen for World War II Motion Picture Soundtrack’ Mr. Mills posted his shopping list of hardware required and left his E-mail address. A friend of Kevin Brittingham passed the info on to him.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="445" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-49.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16725" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-49.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-49-300x191.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-49-600x381.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><strong>Capt. Miller leads a special squad of Rangers in <em>&#8220;Saving Private Ryan&#8221;. </em></strong><em>Courtesy Dream Works/Paramount</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Shannon Mills telephoned Kevin Brittingham. They worked out the arrangements for the shoot. Two days later Shannon Mills and Chris Boyes rolled to a stop on West Crogan Street just past the Courthouse in Lawrenceville, Georgia. The way they had packed their Suburu Outback with sound equipment would have made Paul Hogan proud. Kevin, Harold, and Vince met Shannon and Chris at the front door of Advanced Armament. Kevin pointed to the loaded Advance Armament trucks and told them to fall in behind. The convoy motored to the large farm of Kevin’s brother Greg outside Bethlehem, Georgia. Once on the farm, the trucks made their way to Greg Brittingham’s 500 yard gun range.</p>



<p>Both crews unloaded their separate gear. Before they set up, they discussed shots and held a safety meeting. Neither crew counted this as their first rodeo. Kevin, Harold, and Vince brought up the crew served guns and stationed the small arms at the ready. They then brought up the ammunition. Shannon Mills and Chris Boyes spent about an hour and a half carefully placing microphones at strategic spots. In addition to wiring everything from the firing position to the back of the berm, they employed hand held sound recorders. After Skywalker Sound finished final sound checks and cleared the range, the Advanced Armament crew went through their gun checks.</p>



<p>Kevin and Harold set up the MG 42 on a Lafette tripod. Vince brought up the belted 8mm ammunition. Kevin and Harold took turns letting the gun rip and piling up brass. Chris Boyes and Shannon Mills took turns operating the switchboard to the well-placed microphones and working the hand helds. They had rigged various mikes with kill switches to capture the gun sounds from different positions. With the switchboard they captured impact sounds in grass, dirt, wood, water, and steel. Harold Shinn then brought up the Solothurn S18/1000 20mm anti-tank rifle. Kevin cranked the chain and shook the ground. Skywalker Sound captured the thunder.</p>



<p>The Advanced Armament crew then switched to other guns. They fired the A-4 Browning, the ’03 Springfield, the BAR, and the M1A1 Thompson. Skywalker Sound captured these guns in single shots, short bursts, and extended bursts. As with the ’42 and Solothurn, they captured the sounds of shooting mud, water, wood, metal, and trees. They then recorded sounds past trees, through trees, and bullet impacts into sand. Skywalker also captured the sounds of loading magazines and loading each of the weapons.</p>



<p>Both crews then set up to capture some of the eeriest sounds used in ‘Saving Private Ryan’. A friend, now a retired Army officer, commented specifically on these particular sounds after viewing ‘Saving Private Ryan’. He did multiple tours in Vietnam with both Special Forces and the Rangers. He knows of what he speaks. He stated that,’&#8230;those sounds of bullets going past their heads made the hair on the back of my neck stand up!’ Advanced Armament and Skywalker Sound devised an ingenious and completely safe way to capture those sounds.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="452" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-45.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16728" style="width:578px;height:895px" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-45.jpg 452w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-45-194x300.jpg 194w" sizes="(max-width: 452px) 100vw, 452px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><strong>Battle scene from Saving Private Ryan.</strong> <em>Courtesy Dream Works/Paramount</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Using the microphone kill switches Skywalker captured the bullets in flight as the gun crew fired suppressed weapons. Advanced Armament fired at or past designated targets. The appropriate mike picked up the desired sounds. Kevin, Harold, and Vince used modern subguns for this part of the recording session. Kevin first hauled out an MP45SD. He then followed with a Beretta M12S with can. Vince Mueller wielded a Colt 635 with can. Harold Shinn finished off the first part of the session with a canned Uzi. The Advanced Armament crew then took turns firing. As they fired, Chris Boyes and Shannon Mills recorded both bullet flights and impacts from the suppressed weapons.</p>



<p>At days end, the last piece of brass hit the ground. Both crews were exhausted. The men of Advanced Armament and Skywalker Sound had brought their considerable skills to bear. They had pooled their considerable talents to create the firearms sounds for ‘Saving Private Ryan’. Their hard work and professionalism created something special for a very special movie. Kevin Brittingham stated that all of the guns sounds in ‘Saving Private Ryan’ came from the guns of Advanced Armament Corporation. Kevin, Harold Shinn, and Vince Mueller had the satisfaction of being half of the ‘Saving Private Ryan’ sound effects team. A couple of days later, the postman dropped off a letter. In it Kevin found a check and a thank you note from the other half of the team — Chris Boyes and Shannon Mills of Skywalker Sound.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Epilogue —’The Director Speaks’</h2>



<p>In writing, most works contain an element in which the writer does not describe but speaks directly to the reader. Writers generally ascribe the phrase ‘the writer speaks’ to this element. One finds this in short stories, novels, and magazine articles. Motion pictures dictate a different kind of writing and a different element.</p>



<p>In film, first there is the script, or the word. The word answers the questions ‘Is it visual?’ and ‘Does it move?’. Dialogue and visuals drive films. These drivers make films the director’s medium, not the writer’s medium. Because movies also consist of collaborative effort, one very rarely finds the element of ‘the director speaks’. In ‘Saving Private Ryan’ Mr. Spielberg gives the viewer not only something wonderful but something quite rare.</p>



<p>In each and every detail, Steven Spielberg sought to honor those of that magnificent generation that secured freedom for all of us. He hired Dale Dye (see SAR July 98) as military advisor. He consulted with Dr. Stephen Ambrose and Mark Bando. He met with numerous reenactors, many historians, and visited actual locations to craft his film. When he looked for old guns driven the old ways, Steven Spielberg came to one of us. The Title 2 community legally owns and fires the old guns. In so doing we help preserve their places in history, both of uses and of gun craft. In the doing we honor those who came before us. When Mr. Spielberg asked for help from one of us, he paid the same honor to the D-Day soldiers that we do as a matter of course.</p>



<p>In short, Mr. Steven Spielberg wanted not only the sight but the sound of what so many had confronted. He wished for us to experience the most pivotal day of the 20th century — June 6, 1944. The veterans could point to ‘Saving Private Ryan’ and say to their grandchildren, ‘If you wish to know of the Second World War, see this picture!’. In so doing, Mr. Spielberg paid tribute to his father, to mine, and to so many other men and women of the magnificent generation that came before us. The readers and writers of the Small Arms Review now know the following. To get the correct sounds, Mr. Steven Spielberg did not go to Hollywood. He came to one of us.</p>



<p>In short, Steven Spielberg needed correct gun work. He asked.the Title 2 community for assistance. We delivered. Kevin Brittingham’s company generated the gun sounds for ‘Saving Private Ryan’. With those sounds, Mr. Spielberg added yet another component to the collaborative effort that is his magnificent film. Perhaps Herbert Biberman said it best. Mr. Biberman once remarked, ‘You must resist the tyranny of the Right and the Left. Your art must be free.’ In the making of ‘Saving Private Ryan’ Mr. Spielberg kept his art free. In the way he chose to keep his art free, he also kept it true.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="445" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-33.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16731" style="width:578px;height:909px" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-33.jpg 445w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-33-191x300.jpg 191w" sizes="(max-width: 445px) 100vw, 445px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><strong>Advanced Armament Inventory.</strong> <em>Photo by Kevin Brittingham.</em></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>‘Saving Private Ryan’ captured The Golden Globe Award for ‘Best Picture’. As for the Academy Awards, many honors awaited. In addition to other honors accorded the film on March 21, 1999, The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences bestowed its highest honors for sound to Dream Works’ Skywalker Sound. The Academy honored ‘Saving Private Ryan’ with Academy Awards for ‘Achievement In Sound Editing’ and ‘Achievement In Sound’.</p>



<p>Though many more accolades will continue to come to this magnificent motion picture, the following says it for this writer. My father’s perspective on this picture comes from standing upright in Normandy with a Thompson submachine gun at 30 minutes after midnight on June 6, 1944. He landed as part of the Apache Regiment of the 101st, the regiment of ‘Ryan’. Thanks to Dream Works, I had the privilege of viewing this motion picture with him. Afterward, we talked about Normandy and the gallant men with whom he served. Some of that discussion rests in this article. Simply put, in ‘Saving Private Ryan’ Dream Works filmed the Defense of Freedom. In so doing, they employed the Sounds of Bethlehem. Well done, Steven Spielberg. Well done, Chris Boyes and Shannon Mills. Very well done.</p>



<p>This writer wishes to thank Ms. Stephanie Watson and the publicity staff at Dream Works/Paramount for their splendid asistance. Special thanks also goes to Phil Parker, ever alert and an all around good guy. I would like to thank Mr. Edward J. Land Jr. and The National Rifles Association of America for their kindness and splendid assistance. On a personal note, this writer would also like to thank Mr. Steven Spielberg, on behalf of his father and mine. — Rick Cartledge</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sources:</h2>



<p>Kevin Brittingham,<br>Advanced Armament Corporation,<br>221 West Crogan ST,<br>Lawrenceville, GA 30045<br>770-277-4946 phone,<br>770-963-6556</p>



<p>Edward J. Land, JR.<br>National Secretary<br>National Rifle Association of America<br>11250 Waples Mill RD<br>Faifax, VA 22030<br>702-267-1055</p>



<p>The 101st in Normandy and The 101st From Holland to Hitler’s Eagle’s Nest by Mark Bando,<br>9025 West parkway,<br>Detroit, MI 48239<br>$23 each, $42 both PPD<br>Note: Readers will find Mr. Bando in the credits of Saving Private Ryan</p>



<p>The Academy of Motion<br>Picture Arts and Sciences,<br>8949 Wilshire BLVD,<br>Beverly Hills, CA 90211<br>310-247-3000</p>



<p>‘Panther’<br>by Melvin and Mario Van Peebles<br>available at rental stores</p>



<p>‘Saving Private Ryan’<br>by Steven Spielberg<br>now playing, need we say more.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SITREP: October 1999</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/sitrep-october-1999-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 1999 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buybacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITREP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situation Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=16398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On Friday, August 13, 1999 I was reading an article in the LA Times called The Reality of Weapons Buybacks by Joe Mozingo. There are several very interesting points in his story. He seems frustrated with the results that they have been getting- read on:]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Dan Shea</p>



<p>On Friday, August 13, 1999 I was reading an article in the LA Times called The Reality of Weapons Buybacks by Joe Mozingo. There are several very interesting points in his story. He seems frustrated with the results that they have been getting- read on:</p>



<p><em>“They set out with boundless energy and a mission to get guns off their streets, where violence is so common that many can’t imagine a life without it. With the help of their history teacher, the students at El Sereno Middle School decided to do what fed-up communities across the nation have done for years. They raised money to buy back weapons, preferably from gang members and other people who shouldn’t have them. They hit the pavement in May, selling candy to neighbors in their Eastside community.</em></p>



<p><em>But they soon marched into a thicket of logistical snags, showing the profound difficulty people face in trying to get guns away from bad guys”.</em></p>



<p><em>“But after working out many details of how gun owners would relinquish their weapons—to police officers on the scene—the students said they ran into a state law that seems to defeat the purpose of the buyback. Police cannot take a gun, even one voluntarily handed over, without noting the owner’s name, address and phone number, officials said.</em></p>



<p><em>Although the reason for the law is to ensure that guns used in crimes can be traced, the students logically assume that no gang member or criminal would turn over their weapon under such circumstances.</em></p>



<p><em>This has been the key dilemma with buybacks since they first became popular in the United States a decade ago, said Luis Tolley, western director of the nonprofit organization Handgun Control.</em></p>



<p><em>“They’re not going to take guns away from hardened criminals,” Tolley said, citing the alleged gunman at the Jewish Community Center, Buford Oneal Furrow. But he said the buybacks can help educate people, and remove guns from some homes, preventing an argument from turning deadly.”</em></p>



<p><em>”Tolley praised the students, but said their real service “is going door-to-door and talking about having guns in the home,” he said. “If you measure these buybacks by the guns retrieved, it’s going to be a failure.”</em></p>



<p>We already know that gun “Buybacks” are a failure. Criminals don’t turn in their guns, honest people do. While the California law that prevented the “Buyback” from proceeding anonymously may have “Crimped the style” of the anti-gunners, it did pull just a little bit of the wool off of the wolf, so we could get another glimpse of what kind of animal it is. They don’t care at all about the criminals, they care about educating people that guns are “Bad”. People can’t control themselves, so we have to make sure they don’t have sharp objects around they can hurt each other with. It would appear that we all need to live in a fluffy world, cared for by the liberals, kept from harm by keeping us stupid and far away from anything that could possibly harm us.</p>



<p>Symbolism over substance. Why not punish the criminals? How about enforcing the laws we have? Here’s a thought- why not try educating people about the safe use and storage of firearms, like used to be done?</p>



<p>Someone help those kids start a rifle team.</p>



<p><em>-Dan</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industry News: October 1999</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/industry-news-october-1999/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert M. Hausman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert M.Hausman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y2K Thieves]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Concerns about possible civil disorder on January 1, 2000 when the power and lights may go out, are being raised not only by firearms consumers who are purchasing guns for self-protection at a steady clip these days, but also by firearms dealers who fear looters.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Robert M. Hausman</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Gun Dealers Urged To Counter Y2K Thieves</h2>



<p>Concerns about possible civil disorder on January 1, 2000 when the power and lights may go out, are being raised not only by firearms consumers who are purchasing guns for self-protection at a steady clip these days, but also by firearms dealers who fear looters.</p>



<p>As the Clinton Administration increased controls on civilian access to firearms during the 1990’s, government statistics show there has been a corresponding increase in thefts of firearms from the premises of licensed dealers. Some criminals apparently feel if they can’t buy the guns, they will just steal them.</p>



<p>Recognizing these factors, the Maryland Licensed Firearms Dealers Association recently issued a warning in its members’ newsletter to plan for a worst case Y2K scenario by heading off the thieves with extra security measures. Criminals across the nation may be planning to burglarize gun shops after midnight on December 31, 1999, reasoning the police will be too busy to respond to store burglar alarms as they will concentrate on handling more serious emergencies brought on by Y2K, the Association says.</p>



<p>If there is no police response to the alarms, “thieves will have time to penetrate gun shops’ physical defenses and remove the firearms inventory. Remember, there is no lock that can’t be broken, no door that can’t be smashed, no bars that can’t be removed, if criminals have enough time,” the newsletter warns.</p>



<p>Dealers are advised to place all of their firearms in a secure safe. “At the very least, all firearms should be removed from view of the store’s front window. Place a sign on the store’s door stating, that all firearms have been removed.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">ATF News</h2>



<p>In remarks made in early May before the International Association of Chiefs of Police meeting in Dublin, Ireland, John W. Magaw, director of the gun industry’s regulator, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco &amp; Firearms (ATF) noted his agency’s investigations into firearms trafficking have found there is an increasing frequency for international organized criminals to be involved.</p>



<p>“The major areas for trafficking of US -sourced firearms in Europe are the Baltic States, the former Soviet Union, and the Balkan States. To a lesser degree, Great Britain, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Finland, and Germany have all been impacted by illegal international firearms trafficking,” Magaw explained.</p>



<p>Offering to provide technical assistance to interested agencies in combating illegal firearms trafficking, Magaw said the ATF National Tracing Center (NTC), which traces the origins and ownership of recovered US -sourced firearms at the request of American police is available for use by law enforcement agencies worldwide. “Tracing is often a vital step in identifying trafficking organizations,” Magaw stated.</p>



<p>“In 1996 the NTC had 15,000 international firearm trace requests, and 60,000 such requests in 1998. We anticipate 100,000 plus international trace requests for 1999. ATF, with our international counterparts, has initiated more than 1,500 international firearms trafficking cases, based in part, from information received from these traces,” Magaw disclosed.</p>



<p>The National Integrated Ballistics Information Network, an ATF/FBI partnership venture, was also mentioned as available to law enforcement agencies around the world. The Network employs a firearms identification technology system that captures a digitized image of the unique markings imprinted on a projectile and on shell casings and compares those markings with all other images of shell casings and projectiles previously entered into a database to produce potential matches. In this way, cartridges can be traced as having been fired from particular firearms. The system is being deployed not only in the US, but in countries such as Venezuela, Israel, Turkey, Taiwan, People’s Republic of China, Greece, South Africa, Thailand, and Canada.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pawn Shop Raided</h2>



<p>A federal search warrant culminating a three-month undercover investigation was executed May 20, at the 27th Avenue Pawn &amp; Gun shop at 2045 NW 27th Ave., Miami, FL, as well as upon the store’s owner, Roman Hernz, by ATF and Miami police for alleged illegal firearm trafficking and sales.</p>



<p>Hernz, who had been in business since early 1992, and previously ran other pawnshops during the 1980’s, is suspected of conspiring and engaging in numerous illegal firearms transactions known as “straw purchases,” according to ATF. A “straw purchase” involves an individual who acts at the behest of the true purchaser to acquire the firearms. Specifically, the actual buyer uses the straw purchaser to execute the federally mandated firearms acquisition form (ATF Form 4473) purporting to show that the straw purchaser is the actual purchaser of the firearms.</p>



<p>In many instances, the actual buyers may be prohibited from legally purchasing firearms, or may simply want to hide their involvement in the procurement of the firearms. The licensee selling the firearm under these circumstances also violates federal law if the licensee is aware of the false statement on the form.</p>



<p>ATF’s National Tracing Center has determined that numerous firearms sold by 27th Ave. Pawn &amp; Gun have been recovered by law enforcement authorities throughout the Caribbean and Central America. Foreign police officials initiated many traces after recovering the firearms at crime scenes in their respective countries.</p>



<p>This dealer, ATF says, though a medium sized pawnshop, has for the last six months been responsible for the multiple sales of more handguns than any other gun dealer in the metropolitan Miami area. A multiple sale refers to the sale or purchase of two or more handguns within a five consecutive day time frame. The store was also said to be a leading source of inexpensive ($100 to $150 price range) low quality pistols illegally trafficked to Haiti, Puerto Rico, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic.</p>



<p>Hernz could face multiple federal counts of selling firearms in violation of state laws, selling firearms without recording the identity of the purchaser, and maintaining false firearms records. If convicted, Hernz could potentially be sentenced to five years and/or fined on each count.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Alleged Traffickers Nabbed</h2>



<p>On March 10, Jamal Hyden of West Philadelphia, PA and Dominic Howard of Greensboro, NC, were arrested by the Philadelphia Firearms Trafficking Task Force (composed of ATF special agents and Philadelphia police detectives) for federal firearms violations. The arrests followed an indictment by a federal grand jury of the pair for conspiring to engage in the business of dealing firearms without a license, aiding and abetting, and (in the case of Hyden) receiving firearms while under indictment. The government further alleged the two agreed to have Howard purchase firearms in North Carolina at various licensed dealers, and Hyden was to sell these firearms for profit in Philadelphia.</p>



<p>During the course of the investigation, an ATF operative was able to infiltrate the conspiracy and purchase about 24 firearms. The types of guns purchased included: 15 Lorcin 9mm pistols; three Intratec 9mm pistols; one Glock .357 pistol; one Llama .45; one Jennings/Bryco 9mm; one HiPoint 9mm rifle; and two Norinco 7.62x39mm rifles. The total number of firearms trafficked by these individuals is still being investigated. All of the undercover purchases took place in Philadelphia. All of the purchased firearms, with the exception of two, had the serial numbers obliterated at the time of purchase.</p>



<p>The investigation initiated at the request of the Philadelphia School Board Investigation Unit for the tracing of two firearms recovered on school grounds. Philadelphia police offices early one morning had arrested two 18-year-old males for discharging firearms in the schoolyard of William Penn High School. Both firearms had their serial numbers obliterated.</p>



<p>The Philadelphia Police Firearms Identification Unit was able to restore the serial numbers. ATF then initiated a trace of the firearms and determined that both guns were purchased by Howard in Greensboro, NC just 48 hours prior to their recovery.</p>



<p>If found guilty, Hyden could receive up to 20 years in prison and a maximum fine of $1 million. Howard could receive up to 10 years in prison and a maximum fine of $500,000.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Defendant Pleads Guilty</h2>



<p>Gerald Lowrance of Stockton, CA, was recently sentenced to serve 18 months in federal prison followed by three years of supervised probation for violating federal firearms laws. As part of a plea bargain, Lowrance pled guilty to a violation of United States Code, Title 18, Section 922(k), possession and transfer of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">New ATF Chief Counsel</h2>



<p>John J. Manfreda, formerly ATF’s deputy chief counsel, has been appointed chief counsel. In his new position, Manfreda is responsible for all legal services related to firearms, explosives, tobacco, arson, alcohol, and administrative law. He also is responsible for overseeing the preparation and review of proposed legislation, regulations, and executive orders relating to the laws affecting and enforced by ATF.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Military Developments</h2>



<p>In other news, the U.S. Army is reported as testing a remotely-controlled robotic platform that can aim and fire arms such as the M-16 rifle and .50 caliber machine guns. Known as the Telepresent Rapid Aiming Platform (TRAP) T-2, the device enables troops to aim and fire their guns from positions out of harm’s way.</p>



<p>Developed by Precision Remotes, Inc. of Point Richmond, California, the $50,000 system allows the soldier to remain hidden while observing an area through a video camera and sighting in on targets through a high-powered, automatic focus sight. The system consists of a weapons mounting platform, a video camera, a sight and a control box with a viewfinder. The camera can be used for an overview of the target area, or to zoom in with the high-powered sight. The control box contains buttons for adjusting aim. TRAP also contains two lasers to warn intruders coming into guarded territory that they are being targeted in a high-tech version of the old, “Halt, or I’ll shoot” command.</p>



<p>When the control box is connected to the platform with electrical cables, the arm can be controlled from as great a distance as 1,000 meters. The control distance can be extended infinitely if connected via a radio frequency link. Weighing 38 pounds, the system is intended to be issued to squads or platoons and possibly mounted on vehicles.</p>



<p>Have identified reflections from the objective lenses and laser protective filters of its optics as an issue, the U.S. Army has awarded Tenebraex Corp. of Boston, Massachusetts, a contract for over 35,000 anti-reflection devices (ARDs) for five fire control and observation optics. The firm’s killFlashTM ARD filters will be used for the Army’s M24 Sniper Weapon System’s optics including the Leupold day rifle sight, the AN-PVS-10 Day/Night Sight, and the M144 spotting scope, as well as the M22 (Steiner and Corion) Binoculars and the M24 Miniature Binoculars.</p>



<p>killFlashTM ARDs use a honeycomb material and patented geometry to provide a retrofittable solution to glint and glare from optical surfaces with minimal light loss and no loss in resolution. In addition to hiding glint, the product is claimed to allow users to see the target better in conditions of high glare, such as when looking into morning or afternoon sun or when shooting across snow.</p>



<p>Glint is a serious threat to operational security, yet it is often not considered by military commanders. Glint, however, has played a crucial role in military history. For example, the Japanese Army’s second attack on Henderson Air Force base in World War Two’s Battle of Guadalcanal was turned when a U.S. Marine patrol saw reflections from a Japanese officer’s binoculars on a hilltop, in what had been thought to be unoccupied, impenetrable jungle. Because of that sighting, the U.S. commander was able to shift forces to his previously unprotected flank and defeat the enemy attack.</p>



<p>Moshe Dayan, the Israeli general, got his famous eye patch when a sniper saw reflections of the sun from Dayan’s binoculars. In the Battle of Stalingrad, the top Soviet sniper, Vasili Zaitsev, won his famous three-day duel with the top Nazi sniper, Major Koning, by looking for and targeting the reflection from the German’s scope.</p>



<p>Glint even played a decisive part in the Battle of Gettysburg during the Civil War. As the Confederates prepared to attack, Union General Gouverneur Warren arrived on the top of Little Round Top hill, where his men had reported seeing movement in the trees below. The General asked that a shell be fired into the area and as the shot went whistling through the air, the sound caused the enemy troops to look in its direction.</p>



<p>“This motion revealed to me the glistening of gun barrels and bayonets of the enemy’s line of battle, already formed and far outflanking the position of any of our troops. I immediately sent a hastily written dispatch requesting an additional division,” General Warren later said. Those reinforcements, turned the Confederate attack and preserved the Union’s possession of the hill.</p>



<p>KillFlash technology. in addition to sights, is also available for laser-protective goggles, vehicle headlights and windshields.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Review: October 1999</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/new-review-october-1999/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris A. Choat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris A. Choat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEN MK II]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you have a Sten, semi-automatic or select-fire or even if you have some Sten parts kits, the STEN Recoil Buffer is a NEW accessory item that will benefit you and your gun! The Sten is already a fairly tame firearm by itself, but with the Recoil Buffer installed, the recoil will feel near to nothing! The shooter should notice at least a 60% reduction in felt recoil and less muzzle climb. It will add life to any Sten by stopping the metal-to-metal contact and wear from the rear of the bolt impacting the return spring housing/cap. The recoil buffer also reduces the noticeable action noise of the Sten. Installation is simple, especially for those already familiar with the disassembly of their Sten. Easy to follow illustrated instructions are included with each Sten Recoil Buffer. Retail price for the new buffer is $5.50 with a special introductory price of just $4.25 each with $3.50 shipping and handling per total order. Also, for a limited time buy 2 and get 1 FREE. For more information or to place an order contact Mark Holloway at 25th CTC (25th Century Today Concepts), Dept. SAR, Rt #1, Box 127C, Griffithville, AR 72060. Phone: 1-870-256-9989. Fax: 1-870-256-4580. E-mail: mjholowy@ipa.net.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Chris A. Choat</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">STEN MK II, III AND V RECOIL BUFFER</h2>



<p>If you have a Sten, semi-automatic or select-fire or even if you have some Sten parts kits, the STEN Recoil Buffer is a NEW accessory item that will benefit you and your gun! The Sten is already a fairly tame firearm by itself, but with the Recoil Buffer installed, the recoil will feel near to nothing! The shooter should notice at least a 60% reduction in felt recoil and less muzzle climb. It will add life to any Sten by stopping the metal-to-metal contact and wear from the rear of the bolt impacting the return spring housing/cap. The recoil buffer also reduces the noticeable action noise of the Sten. Installation is simple, especially for those already familiar with the disassembly of their Sten. Easy to follow illustrated instructions are included with each Sten Recoil Buffer. Retail price for the new buffer is $5.50 with a special introductory price of just $4.25 each with $3.50 shipping and handling per total order. Also, for a limited time buy 2 and get 1 FREE. For more information or to place an order contact Mark Holloway at 25th CTC (25th Century Today Concepts), Dept. SAR, Rt #1, Box 127C, Griffithville, AR 72060. Phone: 1-870-256-9989. Fax: 1-870-256-4580. E-mail: <a href="mailto:mjholowy@ipa.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">mjholowy@ipa.net</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">STRENGTH-LOCK GUN CASE</h2>



<p>The Strength-Lock Case is the first affordable protective handgun case designed specifically to store handguns safely without the use of numbered locks or other keyed entry devices. This case will absolutely minimize the possibility of a handgun being accessed by a child or any other unauthorized user, yet the Strength-Lock case still allows the handgun owner quick access whenever a need arises. The Strength-Lock case utilizes a simple but very effective secret locking mechanism. There are no keys to find or combinations to remember. Special instructions for the secret locking mechanism are easily mastered by the handgun owner and can then be destroyed. As an added deterrent, the technique to operate the locking mechanism requires the strength and manual dexterity of an adult. There are two versions of the locking mechanism. The Strength-Lock Lite is ideal for women handgun owners or for households with only small children. The original Strength-Lock Case is suitable for all other households. The Strength-Lock is the perfect carrying/storage case for handguns. It is strong, durable and stable and will hold handguns with barrel lengths up to 6 inches. This affordable case cushions and protects a handgun while helping to keep it out of a childs’ hands. No product can guarantee to be 100% childproof, but the Strength-Lock Case will significantly limit any child’s ability to access its contents. For more information contact Douglas Industries, L.L.C. Dept. SAR, 2850 East Prestwick Road, Warsaw, IN 46580. Phone: 1-219-269-4959. Fax: 1-219-267-2499.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">H&amp;K 91/G3 FLAT TOP RECEIVER</h2>



<p>Federal Arms is now selling an all U.S. made H&amp;K 91/G3 style receiver. The receiver is super strong, super light weight and is made entirely of aluminum. Using the same technology as is used in the M-16 rifle receiver the Federal Arms H&amp;K type receiver is precision machined from a solid block of aluminum. The new receiver is said to be 20% stronger than the original H&amp;K receiver. It features a built-in scope rail milled right into the top of the receiver allowing the user to mount optics without the need of purchasing an additional, not to mention expensive scope mount. The receiver is also milled to acccept the original H&amp;K rear sight so the shooter can have either open sights or the use of a scope. It has a pebble grain feel and is finished in a space-age black Teflon coating. The coating offers unrivaled lubricity as well as functional integrity. With the purchase of a readily available parts kit, the receiver allows an entire firearm to be assembled quickly and easily without the need for any welding. The receiver will only accept semi-auto parts as per B.A.T.F. guidelines. Now you can have the H&amp;K style firearm that you thought was gone forever! For more information contact Federal Arms Corporation of America, Dept. SAR, 7928 University Avenue, Fridley, MN 55432. Phone: 1-612-780-8780.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): October 1999</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-october-1999/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Nick Steadman</p>



<p><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em></p>



<p>EVEN MORE STEYR SCOUTS WITH KLA: in his recent jottings, Col Jeff Cooper reports that he was told in Austria that there are 35-50 Steyr Scout Rifles in Kosovo. Since we understand the KLA is allowed to keep its commercial bolt-action rifles and any shotguns, we guess they’ll be staying there. We’d be very interested to know where the Scouts actually came from, however.</p>



<p>NATO BOMBING CAMPAIGN HAD NEGLIGIBLE MILITARY IMPACT: a Daily Telegraph item said a NATO review of the Serbia bombing campaign had concluded this had virtually no military impact on Milosevic, who only rolled over after losing Russian support. It found that the Serbian forces in Kosovo had remained essentially unscathed, and that bombing of strategic targets was badly planned &amp; executed. If starting out again, NATO would probably opt to go after targets such as public utilities more fiercely and earlier in any hostilities, and most likely also scrap the policy of ‘phasing’ the bombing of Serb military targets which allowed Milosevic time to regain the propaganda initiative.</p>



<p>The alliance also believes it needs to acquire more remotely controlled, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for detailed low-level reconnaissance and target identification. However, whilst this soul-searching analysis is all fine and dandy, we hope NATO will not find it necessary to re-test its tactics anytime soon, which would reinforce growing hostility outside the ambit of the alliance to the power projection &#8211; as opposed to defensive role that NATO has newly created for itself.</p>



<p>PERSUADE US THAT KOSOVO WILL NOT GO PEAR-SHAPED: we’re still convinced none of the outsiders, starting with NATO, who have been pulling the strings in Kosovo have the foggiest idea what dangerous stuff they’re playing with. We quote:</p>



<p>‘The rebel-led provisional government of Kosovo refuses to acknowledge unconditionally the legal authority of the United Nations civilian administration in the region, and warns that it could revert to armed struggle if the UN administration fails to lead Kosovo toward independence’ (Wall Street Journal Europe, 5 Jul 99)</p>



<p>Kosovan independence, you’ll recall, was never on the cards as far as anyone other than the KLA was concerned, but NATO sought &amp; accepted the KLA’s help during the expulsion of Serb forces from Kosovo; now it’s insisting on the Kosovan resistance being disarmed. No-one heeded the old admonition that one never messed with the Balkans except at one’s own peril. We can now see another Northern Ireland already in the making.</p>



<p>COLT ‘BETTING THE COMPANY’ ON SMART GUN: there was another minor publicity blip for the Colt Smart Gun in late Jul 99 when Newsweek ran a piece reporting that a patent had been applied for. It said that Colt president Steve Sliwa, whose mission was get the Smart Gun up &amp; running, was not a gun-owner when he joined the Hartford firm and quoted him as saying “We’re essentially a 1950s company with old equipment”. As to the implications of the Smart Gun, Sliwa reportedly said “We’re betting the company on this”.</p>



<p>$2.95 A MINUTE FAX ‘POLL’ CREATES WAVES: in late May 99, a warning was issued by Better Business Bureaus (BBB) about a so-called ‘National Gun Control Poll’, voting papers for which were faxed unsolicited to ‘over 4 million’ recipients in the USA by a firm calling itself 21st Century Fax Ltd in New York, though this was reportedly only a ‘mail drop’. BBB said that the ‘poll’ actually originated from 21st Century Fax Ltd in London, which has a Website http://www.pollresults.co.uk/ showing that it also sells such exciting stuff as exercise and weight loss tips by fax and Internet.</p>



<p>Significantly, the poll (a copy of which is on our files) notes that replying by fax will take around 1-2 minutes, and calls to either of the two 1-900 numbers shown would cost $2.95 a minute. Ermmm &#8211; over four million forms at $2.95 to $5.90 a whack? That’s an awful lot of premium phone-rate income.</p>



<p>Complaints were made to the FCC http://www.fcc.gov/ and FTC http://www.ftc.gov/ about this fax poll, and an investigation was under way &#8211; FCC rules prohibit unsolicited commercial faxes.</p>



<p>BBB went on to say that, according to a Washington Post report, a temporary injunction was obtained earlier this year by regulators in the UK against the director &amp; other officers of a sister company, 20th Century Fax Ltd, alleging it sent deceptive &amp; misleading information in faxes offering a ‘Yummy Yum Yum Diet’. However, anyone taking seriously any communication about something with such a daft name as this probably deserves all he gets.</p>



<p>STINGERS STILL CIRCULATING: those Stinger SAMs the CIA originally supplied to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan keep popping up unexpectedly &#8211; The Asian Age recently showed an Indian army NCO inspecting a sample recovered from Pakistani troops, along with a number of 7.62mm MG3 GPMGs, a GPMG sustained-fire kit and a 30mm AGS-17 grenade launcher.</p>



<p>HIRED GUNS: an Independent on Sunday story in May 99 said that, in an attempt to persuade Hollywood moviemakers to come to the UK, the British government was offering to hire out regular &amp; reserve military personnel and equipment, to which end a new MOD liaison post had been created. The MOD will charge ‘commercial’ daily rates of £60 per head for troops used in movies, but the servicemen themselves will get nothing extra. Ministers are thought to be miffed because Steven Spielberg borrowed 1,000 troops from the Irish army to make ‘Saving Private Ryan’.</p>



<p>GLOCK INC ON SMART GUNS: The New York Times quoted Glock’s general counsel, Paul Januzzo in Jun 99 on the controversial subject of ‘smart guns’: “The first guy to invent an affordable and reliable smart gun will be a Trillionaire. It’s absurd to say we’re hiding this technology. Why would someone be hiding it? They’d be a wealthy person.” We guess we can take this as a heavy hint as to what Glock itself may be up to.</p>



<p>IANSA GUN-BURNING STUNT: we’ve mentioned before the ‘bonfire of guns’ (aka Flame of Peace) event orchestrated to mark the launch of the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) in the Hague on 11 May 99). Saferworld’s Summer 99 Update newsletter carried a photo of this immortal event, with a Kenyan dignitary lighting a tripod of wooden poles, towards the apex of which were tied, Christmas tree-style, a number of distinctly non-flammable MAC-10 lookalikes, as symbols of evil incarnate.</p>



<p>The whole thing had the bizarre appearance of one of those old Salem witch-burnings. If this cheap stunt is any indication of the quality of debate we can expect from IANSA in the future, we shouldn’t worry too much. What subsequently happened to the slightly-scorched MAC-10s was not disclosed, though the whole thing might have had rather more impact if they’d tied some of the convicted triggermen to the stake rather than trying to cremate a few innocent Ingram clones.</p>



<p>AERIAL GUNFIRE A PROBLEM IN ARIZONA: A Jun 99 report in the Arizona Republic claimed that bullets randomly fired into the air in Phoenix were an increasing public safety hazard. It cited a recent case in which a 14-year-old girl was killed by a stray bullet while standing in her own back yard which had an eight-foot wall around it. Phoenix police say they get at least 50 ‘shots fired’ calls a night, and other cities nearby report similar trends.</p>



<p>In reality of course, it is not usually ‘spent’ bullets fired into the air and plunging to earth under the sole influence of gravity that cause the deaths, but bullets which are still ‘under power’, albeit often at the outer extent of their ballistic trajectory.</p>



<p>UK MOD Y2K PREPARATIONS: it’s been confirmed by the UK MOD that it’s now thoroughly checked its ‘nuclear deterrent’ and the ministry claims there’s ‘no risk of it being fired accidentally through any computer failure’. Nice to know, now we’ve had the house re-painted.</p>



<p>Royal Navy ships should be cleared by Aug 99 and army ‘mission critical’ systems, including weaponry, by Sep 99. All RAF aircraft have already been certified safe to fly after 31 Dec 99.</p>



<p>BRAZIL GUN BAN &#8211; OPPOSITION GETS ORGANISED: the National Association of Firearms Owners and Retailers (ANPCA), formed in Brazil to fight government proposals for an outright gun ban, says it has already managed to get the ‘urgent’ classification of the legislation dropped and also secured a decision from the courts that the Rio de Janeiro state ban, which the federal ban would resemble, is unconstitutional. It furthermore claims that public support for the federal legislation is waning.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Reviews: October 1999</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/book-reviews-october-1999/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Madurski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Ultimate Sniper Author: Major John L. Plaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Madurski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David M. Fortier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death From Above]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From a Stranger’s Doorstep to the Kremlin Gates: A Word from the AK Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Krott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Stuart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The German FG 42 Paratroop Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Stoner Machine Gun: A Navy SEAL Remembers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is the sequel to sniping authority Major Plaster’s book and video “The Ultimate Sniper”. For someone interested in the subject of sniping this is quite a video! Starting off at the famous Gunsite Training Center, founded by Jeff Cooper, Major Plaster gives the viewer a in depth look at some state of the art sniping equipment. Demonstrations are given with .50 caliber sniping rifles, suppressed weapons, laser range finders, and the latest night vision equipment.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By David M. Fortier</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="350" height="600" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-66.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16743" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-66.jpg 350w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-66-175x300.jpg 175w" sizes="(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px" /></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Advanced Ultimate Sniper<br>Author: Major John L. Plaster</h2>



<p><strong>ADVANCED ULTIMATE SNIPER</strong><br>By Major John L. Plaster<br>Paladin Press<br>P.O. Box 1307<br>Boulder, CO 80306<br>1-800-392-2400<br>ISBN 0-87364-916-8<br>$59.95 Plus S&amp;H<br>Aprox. 120 Minutes<br>Reviewed By David Fortier</p>



<p>This is the sequel to sniping authority Major Plaster’s book and video “The Ultimate Sniper”. For someone interested in the subject of sniping this is quite a video! Starting off at the famous Gunsite Training Center, founded by Jeff Cooper, Major Plaster gives the viewer a in depth look at some state of the art sniping equipment. Demonstrations are given with .50 caliber sniping rifles, suppressed weapons, laser range finders, and the latest night vision equipment.</p>



<p>Advanced lessons in fieldcraft are taught in the desert, at night, in the mountains, and in the winter. There is something here for everyone. The night classes are superb with the footage being shot at night and filmed with the aid of night vision. Fieldcraft and shooting techniques are both taught, and this information is relevant to anyone no matter their location. Light discipline is taught, using a normal rifle scope at night, Night observation devices, use of tracers, flashlights to illuminate targets, infrared lasers, and much more.</p>



<p>The mountain classes are directly applicable for use in Yugoslavia or Korea. The effects of elevation on a cartridge and its ballistics are discussed. Normal troop movements in mountainous terrain are discussed and how to foretell where targets are likely to appear. Picking a hide location and what to look for. Making a hide and operating in one.</p>



<p>Winter operations was of particular interest to me as I live in Maine, and the information is excellent. Scope fogging, camouflage, skiing, snow shoes, temperature effect on trajectory, stalking, scope glare, and more are all covered. There is not a lot of information on this subject so this is a welcome addition.</p>



<p>The quality of this video is much better that Major Plaster’s previous video. The material is first rate and now the camera work and sound is up to snuff. I highly recommend this video, while it is expensive, it’s worth it.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="255" height="475" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Stoner-Machine-Gun.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-35205" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Stoner-Machine-Gun.jpg 255w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Stoner-Machine-Gun-161x300.jpg 161w" sizes="(max-width: 255px) 100vw, 255px" /></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Stoner Machine Gun: A Navy SEAL Remembers</h2>



<p>Written by Dennis J. Cummings and Ron Erb<br>Special guest appearance and co-narration by LCDR Michael J. Walsh, USN (Ret.)<br>35 minutes Paladin Press,<br>$29.95<br>Review by Rob Krott</p>



<p>Dennis Cummings, author of Men Behind the Trident (Naval Institute Press) and producer of Navy SEALs; America’s Secret Warriors and other SEAL oriented videos, has once again come through with a winner. This one on the Stoner 63 machine gun. Eugene Stoner (designer of the M16, in case anyone forgot) and a Cadillac Gage engineering team developed the Stoner 63 weapons system. The weapon had six different configurations based on the Stoner receiver. The Stoner 63A light machine gun was the model most frequently used by the US Navy SEALs. Although the US Army and the USMC tested and evaluated the Stoner as a possible replacement for the M60, only the SEALs used the Stoner in significant numbers in Vietnam. It was the primary machine gun of the SEAL teams in Vietnam and the Cadillac Gage engineers received technical reports and requests directly from the field. The opening clips of this video show the various Stoner variants being fired on a range while the weapon’s technical aspects are described. The video also shows the Stoner being tripod mounted in its medium machine gun role.</p>



<p>The focus of the video is provided by LCDR Michael J. Walsh as he reminisces about the Stoner and its role with the SEAL teams in Vietnam. Walsh served five tours in Vietnam, three of them in assignments where he was intimate with the Stoner. In fact, the front cover of Walsh’s memoir, SEAL! Depicts a young Mike Walsh geared up for a mission and holding a Stoner. According to LCDR Walsh, “This added to our firepower like no other weapons could have&#8230; The Stoner was like nothing else around. It was different.”</p>



<p>LCDR Walsh’s participation in this video lends real credence to its historical and technical accuracy and really “makes” the video. He provides an informal technical brief on the weapon detailing its high-points and its foibles including the problems with its feed pawl mechanism and the infamous “dead man’s pin”. The “dead man’s pin” was a receiver pin which when it vibrated loose caused the weapon to fire. It caused the death of one SEAL by his own weapon before being corrected. Walsh discusses various field expedient modifications made to the weapon in Vietnam. He explains how the SEALs carried additional ammo; the adaptation of the box and drum magazines; and the expedient use of captured RPD drum magazines. Walsh gets off the subject a little, but only to make some interesting comments about the SEALs participation in the Phoenix Program and to provide some interesting operational observations such as “Most SEAL operations in Vietnam didn’t go past one evolution of darkness&#8230;you didn’t eat ‘til you got home.” Producer Cummings wisely decided to leave these interesting tidbits in the video.</p>



<p>War stories from LCDR Walsh’s personal experience make the video especially interesting. His on and off camera narration is accompanied by combat file footage on patrol. Vietnam film footage includes a mission brief. One thing you’ll notice is the long hair, mustaches, and beards.. especially the more “beatnik” styles. Some of these guys look like a cross between the Hell’s Angles, the Grateful Dead, and the “Green Berets”. Nobody I’d want to mess with. Other interesting spots on the video is the frequent wearing of Levi’s; what appears to be a SEAL on patrol barefoot; VC rice paddy farmer hats; and most impressive; an M60 gunner carrying a gun equipped with an aircraft feed mechanism and humping the door-gunner ammo pack on his back.</p>



<p>A professional narrator picks up the narration from time to time during the film clips, many of which apply directly to Walsh’s narration. Two of the clips are actually of Walsh’s platoon on actual combat operations. It’s a good summation and discussion of the Stoner’s use by the SEALs in Vietnam, however, I would have liked to have seen a disassembly-assembly of the gun and more technical data, including nomenclature on the weapon. But then again, this wasn’t meant to be a how-to video and a field stripping sequence might bore other people. Weapons aficionados, fans of the Stoner, SEAL buffs, and SEAL veterans will want a copy of this video tape.</p>



<p><em>Robert Krott is a former US Army M60 machine gunner (PFC) and Infantry officer. He is a senior foreign correspondent for Solider of Fortune and a staff writer and columnist for Behind the Lines: The Journal of US Military Special Operations, as well as the Military Affairs Editor for SAR.</em></p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="843" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Kalashnikov-book-843x1024.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-35202" style="width:422px;height:512px" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Kalashnikov-book-843x1024.jpeg 843w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Kalashnikov-book-247x300.jpeg 247w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Kalashnikov-book-768x933.jpeg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Kalashnikov-book-750x911.jpeg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Kalashnikov-book.jpeg 1054w" sizes="(max-width: 843px) 100vw, 843px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">From a Stranger’s Doorstep to the Kremlin Gates: A Word from the AK Man by Mikhail Kalashnikov</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From a Stranger’s Doorstep to the Kremlin Gates: A Word from the AK Man</h2>



<p>By Mikhail Kalashnikov<br>Published by Military Parade Ltd., Moscow 1997<br>ISBN 5-7734-0009-X<br>Review by Charles Madurski</p>



<p>For most of his career, Mikhail Timofeyevich Kalashnikov was surrounded by a state controlled “impenetrable veil of secrecy”. In the paranoid days of post World War II and well into the cold war, his work and existence was considered critical to the defense of the Soviet Union. Not allowed to travel outside of the country and limited in his movements internally, he managed to change the world of military weapons forever. With the break-up of the Soviet Union and other political changes in the world, he decided the time was right to tell his story.</p>



<p>Written in a style reminiscent of a letter to one’s great-grandchildren, “From a Stranger’s Doorstep to the Kremlin Gates- A Word from the AK Man” is a fascinating read. It’s an important one too. A large part of the book is devoted to detailing Kalashnikov’s development of the AK-47. Many arms enthusiasts are familiar with the generalities of the story, how the wounded tanker somehow came up with the idea during his recovery and managed to have prototypes made while convalescing. Few knew, until now, that when he was injured it was because of an encirclement deep in German held territory and he had to travel for days on foot through enemy lines to get to help.</p>



<p>Drawing from an extensive personal archive of letters, commendations, notes and drawings, he recreates the events of his life in great detail, giving new insight into the process of Soviet small arms procurement and exposing new information to complete the legend. Such as the fact his first design was really for a 7.62&#215;25 chambered submachinegun, and it was after this design was rejected that he was invited to compete in the design of a new arm using the then very new M-43 (7.62&#215;39) cartridge.</p>



<p>Through his years of service, Kalashnikov crossed paths with nearly every Russian arms designer of note. They are almost all here, Degtyarev, Goryunov, Makarov, Shpagin, Simonov, Sudayev and Tokarev. Due to the circle he worked in, he is able to discuss other well-known Russian designs from some of his contemporaries. Arms such as the Pistolet Makarov and its adoption or the SKS carbine and the circumstances surrounding its removal from front line service. Unfortunately, his detail is a little lacking when he goes over the development of the AKM, RPK, PK/PKM series, and the AK-74 generation of weapons. At least he does explain, once and for all, that the so-called rate reducer in the AKM was designed simply to “achieve closer grouping of shots”.</p>



<p>Kalashnikov delves into philosophy, poetry, politics, hunting and more. He sheds light on the Russian trait to consider all Slavic people brothers, an important lesson to remember. In a special chapter near the end of the book titled “My Black Box Data Recorder”, he recalls the events that led to his family’s internal exile to Siberia in 1931. Ironically, but perhaps not surprisingly, he expresses a tremendous love for Mother Russia constantly throughout the book, which may explain his involvement in Party politics.</p>



<p>Kalashnikov doesn’t directly address his political career; he only mentions it as part of larger tales or where it needs to be included to fill out some details. He does, however, give the reader a look into the dichotomy of Russian politics, stating at one point that he “never was a staunch communist”, yet it seems he worked his way from being a member of the Young Communists League to his multiple terms as a Deputy of the Supreme Soviet.</p>



<p>At one point during a sales trip to Argentina, Kalashnikov considers all of the gifts he has received while there, mostly souvenir cartridges and several pistols, and he frets over the trouble he will have with customs if he tries to return home with these things. He expresses amazement over the Argentine’s lack of control over such objects, the expectation of responsibility. In contrast, he muses over the inability of his homeland to react the same way. “&#8230;how much trouble, grief and sorrow Russians would have to suffer and how much tragedy Russia would have to go through until it outgrew its obsession with arms the way Argentina had&#8230;” The lesson is clear.</p>



<p>Mikhail Timofeyevich &#8220;Miktim&#8221; Kalashnikov’s autobiography is full of history. Entertaining on many levels, it should be considered a companion volume to the late Dr. Ezell’s AK-47 Story, at least. When viewing all of the innovations and weapons systems and equipment to come from this man and his design teams, Kalashnikov could be called ‘Russia’s Browning”.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="457" height="600" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-62.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16746" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-62.jpg 457w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-62-229x300.jpg 229w" sizes="(max-width: 457px) 100vw, 457px" /></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Death From Above, The German FG 42 Paratroop Rifle</h2>



<p>By Thomas B Dugelby<br>and R Blake Stevens<br>Produced and edited<br>by R Blake Stevens Published by Collector Grade Publications Inc.<br>PO Box 1046<br>Cobourg, Ontario<br>Canada K9A4W5<br>Price $39.95 plus $4.50 S&amp;H<br>Reviewed by Stephen Stuart</p>



<p>The German FG 42 was born out of ‘Operation Merkur’ in May of 1941. The operation called for German paratroopers (Fallschirmjager) to attack the island of Krete in the Mediterranean Sea. The German paratroopers, unlike their American counterparts, jumped without their primary weapons. These were dropped in canisters to be retrieved later, once the paratroopers were on the ground. The British took advantage of the situation, decimating the German troops in the beginning with their full power .303 Enfield rifles and BREN machine guns.</p>



<p>Because of this reason, when the opportunity arose to field a new rifle for the paratroop force. The call was for a rifle firing the standard 8mm Mauser cartridge, instead of the new 7.92x33mm Kurz round for the Sturmgewehr rifles. This new rifle was the FG 42. There are over twenty different variations of the FG 42, they are divided into a basic alphabetical series starting at ‘A’ and ending at ‘G’.</p>



<p>From a personal perspective, I have only seen two FG42s in my entire life, both of them in museums. The author pacifies one’s appetite for information by detailing the different models in pictures and line drawings. Accessories are given special attention in the text; particularly the scope, and field manuals (which have been reproduced in English). Of particular interest to small arms historians is the legacy of the FG42, and the weapons that were derived from it’s earlier innovations.</p>



<p>If you are a history buff of the German Fallschrimjager, or just want to trace the lineage of your pet M-60, this is the book in which to start. As with all of the Collector Grade Publications, this is truly an excellent text. I highly recommend it for your small arms library.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Albany ’99 Spring Machine Gun Shoot</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/albany-99-spring-machine-gun-shoot/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albany ’99 Spring Machine Gun Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Greetings from the PRK. It’s spring and one’s fleeting thoughts turn north to Oregon, a NFA friendly state, for the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club’s Spring Machine gun shoot. Oregon is indeed a beautiful state and the people really are friendly (unless you tell them you’re from CA and you’re thinking of moving there). The state is so friendly the local State Patrol even publishes their “maximum enforcement” time and places in the local newspaper. For example the paper tells you they’re using their airplane to catch speeders on Interstate 5 Sunday from 1:00 PM to 6:00 PM between exits so and so. Of course if you’re not a local, the chances of you seeing the local news paper are small. But come on up. In addition to the chance to meet and shoot with other NFA gun owners and enthusiasts, the lush green forest and valleys are worth the trip.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Jim Wright</p>



<p>Greetings from the PRK. It’s spring and one’s fleeting thoughts turn north to Oregon, a NFA friendly state, for the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club’s Spring Machine gun shoot. Oregon is indeed a beautiful state and the people really are friendly (unless you tell them you’re from CA and you’re thinking of moving there). The state is so friendly the local State Patrol even publishes their “maximum enforcement” time and places in the local newspaper. For example the paper tells you they’re using their airplane to catch speeders on Interstate 5 Sunday from 1:00 PM to 6:00 PM between exits so and so. Of course if you’re not a local, the chances of you seeing the local news paper are small. But come on up. In addition to the chance to meet and shoot with other NFA gun owners and enthusiasts, the lush green forest and valleys are worth the trip.</p>



<p>If you are not local, Albany is a little south of Portland right on Interstate 5. The Albany Rifle and Pistol Club permits campers to park at their facility but there are no hook ups. If you need motel accomadations try the town of Albany about 10 miles north of the range or Eugene which is about 25 miles to the south.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="568" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-67.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16749" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-67.jpg 568w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-67-243x300.jpg 243w" sizes="(max-width: 568px) 100vw, 568px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Chad Wallace with a tricked out M-11.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The Albany Spring Machine Gun Shoot is held every year on the 3rd weekend in May. There is also a winter shoot in December but even the locals say the December Shoot weather usually “sucks”. The Albany Spring shoot is both Saturday and Sunday. Each day’s activities are roughly the same. Formal matches are conducted for subguns, assault rifles in both major and minor calibers, and crew served weapons. Fun shooting and machine gun rental take place throughout both days. Saturday’s paid attendance was 350 people. Sunday’s attendance was about half of that. In spite of the national political anti-gun climate, attendance at the Albany shoot has been climbing steadily each year over the past several years. A lot of the credit for this goes to the efforts of Mark Cook, the event coordinator, and Allen Ericksen, operations manager, for the Rifle and Pistol Club. The club does an excellent job of offering a safe, fun event with something for everyone’s interest.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="372" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-63.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16750" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-63.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-63-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-63-600x319.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Jerry Hesting with an MG-34. He was the Sunday Crew Served Match Winner</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The subgun match is held on the north range. NFA rules apply.On Saturday the course consisted of 47 total targets plus two bonus targets and the usual “no-shoots”. Starting behind a barrel you engage 11 metal targets plus one swinger and one turner. Moving to a barricade you engage approximatley 12 metal targets through a 2” vertical slot. One of the metal targets had an exploder. If you hit the exploder (instead of just the metal plate) it was worth a five second bonus. Moving again to another barrel you engaged another series of poppers and plates. One of the poppers triggered a clay pigeon thrower &#8211; if you hit the clay in the air it was worth another five second bonus. One other tricky target was to break a stationary clay through a hole cut out in a no-shoot that was the same size as the clay. This target was intentionally close so those who didn’t allow suficiently for the bullet path being below the sight path shot the no shoot.</p>



<p>The Saturday Subgun Match consisted of 30 shooters.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="624" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-55.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16751" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-55.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-55-300x267.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-55-600x535.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Greta Morrell on a Thompson 1928, &amp; Wayne Woodcock, Subgun Dir.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The class winners follow:</h2>



<p>1st &#8211; Steve Arnold, M1A1 Th.<br>2nd &#8211; Robert Dunlap, MP5<br>3rd &#8211; Greta Morrel, 1928 Th.</p>



<p>Sunday’s course was similar with 42 total targets and three firing positions. At stage one the turner was back with a bunch of metal plates, pepper poppers and a few no shoots. The exploder bonus (5 seconds) was on this stage Sunday. Stage two involved a number of metal plates shot from behind a vertical barricade. Targets painted blue were engaged by firing from the left shoulder. Targets painted white were engaged firing from the right shoulder. Targets painted red were not supposed to be engaged, period. You basically shot all the blue targets then shifted rifing positions and shot the white plates. Moving to the third firing position you were to engage a plethoria of plates, poppers and bowling pins. The shoot through the hole in the “no-shoot”, so popular from Sat., was back. Sunday’s Subgun Match had 25 shooters.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="493" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-57.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16752" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-57.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-57-300x211.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-57-600x423.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A competitor with suppressed Colt SMG.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The winners follow:</h2>



<p>1st &#8211; Jim Wright, MP5<br>2nd &#8211; Wayne Woodcock, 1928 Th.<br>3rd &#8211; Chad Wallace, M11 9mm<br><br>The course of fire for the assault rifle and crew served matches were very similar. Targets consisted of four metal plates at 100 yards, 6 metal plates including one no shoot at 150 yards and 2 or 3 metal targets at 200 yards. For minor caliber the two plates at 200 yards were five second bonus targets. For major calibers one of the three metal plates was a five second bonus. Crew served weapons had to get all three 200 yard plates. The Assault rifles ended the course of fire by puncturing a gallon water jug and putting three rounds in an IPSIC target at 50 yards. The crew served weapons started with the jug and paper IPSIC target. All assault rifles had to be sot with the equivalent of “iron sights”. Rifles with optics were considered the “unlimited” class.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="454" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-50.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16753" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-50.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-50-300x195.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-50-600x389.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Another happy shooter behind Landis MG-74 (MG-42).</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Saturday’s winners were:</h2>



<p>Assault Rifle Minor caliber (.223)<br>1st &#8211; Mel Andrews, M16<br>2nd &#8211; Hal Gould, M16<br>3rd &#8211; Jim McDowell, M16</p>



<p>Assault Rifles Major caliber (.308)<br>1st &#8211; Larry DeMello, M14<br>2nd &#8211; Jerry Hesting, FN-FAL<br>3rd &#8211; William Kaald, M14</p>



<p>Unlimited Rifle (magnifying optics)<br>1st &#8211; Michael Toney, M16<br>2nd &#8211; Wayne Woodcock, G3<br>3rd &#8211; Fred Sims, M14</p>



<p>Crew Served Weapons (belt fed guns)<br>1st &#8211; Rex Wemmer, 1919A6<br>2nd &#8211; S. L.Wozony, 1919A6<br>3rd &#8211; Branden Wemmer, 1919A6</p>



<p>As you might expect most of the spectators and participants seemed to be from Washing and Oregon. Based on my informal survey of license plates in the parking lot on Saturday, Washington cars almost rivaled Oregon cars. I also saw four Idaho plates, three CA plates and one Nevada plate.</p>



<p>Sunday’s course of fire was similar to Saturday except you started by bursting a water jug hidden from view by cardboard IPSIC targets at 50 yards. There were four metal plates at 100 yards, six metal plates and a “no-shoot” at 150 yards and one small bonus target each at 150 yards and 200 yards. For Sunday major &amp; minor calibers competed in one single class.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="347" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-46.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16754" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-46.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-46-300x149.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-46-600x297.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A Valkyrie Arms M60 being fired &#8220;Rambo&#8221; style.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sunday’s winners were:</h2>



<p>Assault Rifle<br>1st &#8211; Wayne Woodcock, G3<br>2nd &#8211; Dick Thoma, M16<br>3rd &#8211; Craig Mitchell, BAR</p>



<p>Crew Served Weapons<br>1st &#8211; Jerry Hesting, MG34<br>2nd &#8211; Jim Wright, HK21<br>3rd &#8211; Mark Cook, HK21</p>



<p>Over the last several years the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club has made substiantial improvements to their facilities. Under the clever desguise of “sound moderators” both north and south ranges have large metal buildings to “mitigate” the noise from firearms. The buildings also do a wonderful job “mitigating” the normal inclement weather that usually prevails. (You can shoot all day, be under cover and not get wet. ) But this year the weather god smiled. Not a drop of rain fell during either day of this years Spring Shoot. But take my advice, if you come next year at least throw some rain gear in the car. It rained Friday and rain was predicted again Monday. I didn’t hear it this year, but a usual joke is that in Oregon even the Subguns are water cooled.</p>



<p>While the matches were in progress there was plenty of opportunity for just fun shooting and machine gun rental. You could rent anything from a silenced .22 pistol to a M2 .50 cal. Targets consist of water jugs, metal plates and strings of helium filled balloons at various distances. There were lots of Browning’s, MP5’s, Uzi’s, AK’s, MAC ect. One of my favorites was a gentlemen who fired a belt of probably 250 rounds from the hip through a Landes MG-74 (post ’86DS MG42). The NFA people from the northwest are a creative lot. It was interesting to see how adept they are at making new different caliber uppers to fit some standard lowers. Likewise there were all sorts of modifications to magazines to enable a basic magazine to be used in a wide variety of firearms and some clever ways to mount guns on mounts for which they were never intended. And while the MG shoot and Sub Gun matches were going on Sunday the Albany Rifle &amp; Pistol Club also had a Cowboy Shoot take place simultaneously on some of the adjacent north ranges. They really do have some nice facilities.</p>



<p>Personally I thought the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club put on a splend event again this year. In addition to Mark Cook and Allen Ericksen there are a host of Club members who volunteered their time and hard work and made this year’s event a success. Three particular individuals who deserve mention are John Nichols &#8211; Lead Range Safety Officer, Wayne Woodcock &#8211; Subgun Match Director and Mel Andrews &#8211; Main Range Match Director.</p>



<p>SAR readers in Washington &amp; Oregon. If you don’t go to the Albany Spring Shoot you should. For readers a little farther away it’s worth the trip. Plan to take a few extra days and go up to Seattle and Vancouver BC after the shoot. Or go over to the Oregon Coast for a jet boat ride up the Rogue River or just come back down Highway One. Readers from Nevada might just like to seen things naturally green for a change.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="439" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-34.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16755" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-34.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-34-300x188.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-34-600x376.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">MG15 aircraft gun modified for ground.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>If you’ve been to the shoot before skip the following directions. If not I suggest you read on &#8211; the exits are not exactly at the range. From the north take exit #228. Incidently the ARCO station there generally has the lowest gas prices around. From the freeway exit go east .7 mile. Turn right on 7 Mile Lane and go straight as the arrow flies south for 5.0 miles. At the curve turn right on Shedd Rd. and follow it for 2.0 miles. Just where Shedd truns right to cross I5 look over to your left and you’ll see the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club. Look for the large metal buildings. From the south take exit #216. Go west over the freeway until you come to the town of Hasley. Turn right on route 228 East and go north for 2.4 miles which brings you to the town of Shedd. On the north end of Shedd turn right on Boston Mill Rd. (there are signs pointing right for “Plainview” and “Gun Club”)and follow it until it crosses I5. Again the Albany Rifle and Pistol Club is just ahead and slightly to the right. Again look for the metal buildings. For those using “alternative” transportation Albany has a public airport (no commercial service to my knowledge) and an Amtrack station. The airport has rental cars. I don’t know about the train. The nearest commercial airports would be Eugene or Portland. For more information you can call 541-754-1605. If you’re doing form 5320.20’s the address is Albany Rifle &amp; Pistol Club, 2999 Saddle Butte Road, Shedd, OR 97377. The Club also has a web site &#8211; htp://www.proaxis.com/~arpc</p>



<p>Next year come on up to the shoot. You’ll be glad you did.use</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heckler &#038; Koch/Benelli M4 Super 90/XM1014: The US Military’s Innovative New Tactical Shotgun</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/heckler-koch-benelli-m4-super-90-xm1014-the-us-militarys-innovative-new-tactical-shotgun/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Q. Cutshaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benelli M4 Super 90/XM1014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Q. Cutshaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heckler & Koch/Benelli M4 Super 90/XM1014: The US Military’s Innovative New Tactical Shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The military shotgun has been in use, primarily by the American armed forces, for well over a hundred years. Throughout its history as a military small arm, the shotgun has been called by many names. It was first termed a “riot gun” and later a “trench gun.” Later still, the military shotgun came to be called a “fighting shotgun” or “combat shotgun.” While the latter terms still prevail among some, we prefer the term “tactical shotgun” because it precisely describes the use of the gun - as a tactical small arm. While the terms “combat” or “fighting” have a certain macho appeal and the acquisition program was for a “combat shotgun,” neither term precisely defines the role of the shotgun as used by today’s law enforcement or the military. Therefore, we prefer to use a more precise designation - tactical shotguns. The shotgun came into its own as a military small arm in World War I, when American “doughboys” came to France equipped with Winchester Model 1897 “trench guns.” The shotguns were so effective in the trench warfare of the time that Germany lodged a formal protest against their use as “inhumane.” The German protest should give the reader a hint as to the devastating effectiveness of the tactical shotgun in close combat when loaded with the proper ammunition, but the shotgun was judged to be no more inhumane than other weapons and the German protest was disallowed. The tactical shotgun has been a fixture in warfare since, usually in jungles, cities, or in other military operations where an effective close combat weapon was required. Although the American military has been the primary user of tactical shotguns, recent developments in ammunition, most notably non-lethal and specialized shotgun ammunition, coupled with changing military roles and missions have brought the shotgun to the attention of the rest of the world. Many of the world’s small arms manufacturers now produce tactical shotguns, but the recent focus of the world’s potential tactical shotgun market has been the US military’s selection of its most recent tactical shotgun, the Benelli M4 Super 90, officially adopted as the XM1014 in April 1999. Once the first articles under the contract pass their testing, the “X” designation will be dropped and the new gun will take on the designation M1014 and begin replacing the Mossberg M590 and other slide action tactical shotguns in US inventory.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Charles Q. Cutshaw</p>



<p>The military shotgun has been in use, primarily by the American armed forces, for well over a hundred years. Throughout its history as a military small arm, the shotgun has been called by many names. It was first termed a “riot gun” and later a “trench gun.” Later still, the military shotgun came to be called a “fighting shotgun” or “combat shotgun.” While the latter terms still prevail among some, we prefer the term “tactical shotgun” because it precisely describes the use of the gun &#8211; as a tactical small arm. While the terms “combat” or “fighting” have a certain macho appeal and the acquisition program was for a “combat shotgun,” neither term precisely defines the role of the shotgun as used by today’s law enforcement or the military. Therefore, we prefer to use a more precise designation &#8211; tactical shotguns. The shotgun came into its own as a military small arm in World War I, when American “doughboys” came to France equipped with Winchester Model 1897 “trench guns.” The shotguns were so effective in the trench warfare of the time that Germany lodged a formal protest against their use as “inhumane.” The German protest should give the reader a hint as to the devastating effectiveness of the tactical shotgun in close combat when loaded with the proper ammunition, but the shotgun was judged to be no more inhumane than other weapons and the German protest was disallowed. The tactical shotgun has been a fixture in warfare since, usually in jungles, cities, or in other military operations where an effective close combat weapon was required. Although the American military has been the primary user of tactical shotguns, recent developments in ammunition, most notably non-lethal and specialized shotgun ammunition, coupled with changing military roles and missions have brought the shotgun to the attention of the rest of the world. Many of the world’s small arms manufacturers now produce tactical shotguns, but the recent focus of the world’s potential tactical shotgun market has been the US military’s selection of its most recent tactical shotgun, the Benelli M4 Super 90, officially adopted as the XM1014 in April 1999. Once the first articles under the contract pass their testing, the “X” designation will be dropped and the new gun will take on the designation M1014 and begin replacing the Mossberg M590 and other slide action tactical shotguns in US inventory.</p>



<p>Selection of the XM1014 began with a US Marine Corps requirement for a “combat shotgun” that was established in the early 1990s. The requirement was subsequently revised to include the entire US military with the Marine Corps retaining overall program management. The initial shotgun competition was terminated in early 1998 due to technical problems and the program restarted in May of that year. The US military M4 Super 90 project was managed by Heckler &amp; Koch while the gun itself was developed by Benelli. This was probably due to Heckler &amp; Koch’s extensive experience in dealing with the US military and the firm’s demonstrated expertise in managing military small arms projects. Sales of the M4 Super 90/XM1014 will be handled by Benelli, save for US shotguns produced under the current military contract, which are H&amp;K’s province.</p>



<p>The M4 Super 90/XM1014 is a semiautomatic, gas operated, tubular magazine fed tactical shotgun. The bolt assembly is similar to that of the Benelli Montefeltro, with a bolt carrier and rotating two lug bolt that locks into a barrel extension. The shotgun’s gas operation system incorporates a novel design, called Auto-Regulating Gas Operating, or “ARGO,” by the developers. The ARGO system uses two gas ports and tappet type pistons that ride in short cylinders beneath the gun’s barrel. The pistons impinge directly against the face of the bolt carrier to cycle the gun each time the trigger is pulled. According to the manufacturer, the system is unaffected by fouling, requires little or no maintenance and functions reliably with all types of standard shotgun ammunition from low brass target loads to 3 inch (76mm) magnum rounds. We verified this claim in testing, as discussed below. The ARGO gas system is a simple design that we estimate will be extremely reliable in service, based on our brief, but detailed, evaluation and examination of the gun.</p>



<p>Thus far, testing has proven that the XM1014 will reliably function for at least 25,000 rounds of standard ammunition without replacing any major parts. We tested the XM1014 using a variety of ammunition ranging from low-brass target loads, tactical reduced recoil through full power shotgun ammunition, including three-inch magnum and found that the XM1014 functioned flawlessly, regardless of the type of ammunition we used. The XM1014 will not, however, semiautomatically cycle non-lethal ammunition such as rubber buckshot, “bean bags,” or any other similar non-lethal ammunition. This must not be construed as a criticism, because there was no military requirement for the shotgun to function semiautomatically with these types of ammunition. It is merely a statement of fact of which the reader should be aware. The only military requirement was that the gun be capable of manual cycling to operate with non-lethal ammunition. Given the increasing use of the military for peacekeeping operations, however, non-lethal ammunition will probably be used more frequently than in the past. However, the inability to cycle non-lethal ammunition was a conscious decision on the part of the military and we must emphasize that the HK/Benelli gun meets or exceeds every military requirement.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="516" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-70.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16785" style="width:582px;height:790px" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-70.jpg 516w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-70-221x300.jpg 221w" sizes="(max-width: 516px) 100vw, 516px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">M4 SUPER 90/XM1014 FIELD STRIPPING PROCEDURE &#8211; A. Remove magazine cap. B. Remove forearm. C. Remove barrel. D. Remove charging handle E. Remove bolt carrier/bolt assembly F. Using charging handle as a punch, press out trigger group retaining pin. G. Remove trigger group. H. Using charging handle for leverage, unscrew gas cylinder plug. I. Remove gas piston. J. Stripped Benelli. To remove buttstock, rotate buttstock 9 degrees and remove by sliding off recoil spring tube to rear and unscrew pistol grip counterclockwise to remove.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The M4 Super 90/XM1014 is modular in construction so that the user can quickly exchange major components, including barrel, buttstock and forearm to meet changing mission requirements. In its basic configuration with collapsible buttstock, the XM1014 gives the appearance that it would be awkward to handle, but this is not the case. We found the XM1014 to be very comfortable to fire in all configurations. The overall design coupled with the ARGO gas system has the effect of reducing felt recoil and muzzle rise regardless of the type of ammunition used or stock configuration. Available buttstock configurations are collapsible with pistol grip, fixed stock with pistol grip, semi-pistol grip fixed stock and pistol grip only. Changing the XM1014 into any of its various configurations was easily understood and simply accomplished even without written instructions. Disassembly and assembly for reconfiguration or cleaning is straightforward and can be performed without tools in less than a minute’s time. External finish is heavy phosphate black on steel parts and hard anodizing on aluminum components.</p>



<p>Standard XM1014 sights are of the “ghost ring” type with a large rear aperture sight and blade front sight for quick target acquisition. These open sights are adjustable for windage and elevation using the rim of a cartridge. The front sight is fixed in place with a hex nut and can be replaced with a tritium unit if desired. The gun is fitted with a semi-fixed MIL-STD-1913 rail on top of the receiver that will accept any standard optical sight or targeting device. The rail is held in place using locking screws and can be removed, should the need arise.</p>



<p>The XM1014’s 18.5in barrel has removable choke tubes to accommodate virtually any type of ammunition or tactical condition. A 14in barrel is available as an option. Magazine capacity varies with barrel length. The XM1014 with standard 18.5in barrel will accommodate seven shells (6 in the magazine, plus 1 in the chamber) whether they are 2.75 or 3 inch type, while the 14in barrel reduces total magazine capacity to six (5 + 1) 2.75 inch shells or five (4 + 1) 3 inch shells. Overall length of the XM1014 is 39.8 inches with stock extended, 34.9 inches with stock collapsed and 30.3 inches with short barrel and stock collapsed.</p>



<p>Ammunition can readily be changed from type to another as the tactical situation changes. The shell in the chamber can be ejected without feeding a new round onto the elevator by simply pulling the charging handle to the rear. A fresh shell can then simply be dropped onto elevator, the bolt release pressed and the new round chambered. If the user wishes to discard the chambered round and bring up a new round from the magazine, he presses the small magazine release button located on the receiver bottom near the trigger guard and pulls the charging handle, thus ejecting the chambered round and feeding a fresh one from the magazine. The magazine release button is shaped differently than the safety and must be pressed in a different direction for actuation. There is thus little possibility of confusing the two. As stated, the tubular magazine holds six rounds in standard configuration, but tactical reloads can be accomplished at any time during a break in firing by simply “topping off” the magazine through the loading port.</p>



<p>The XM1014 also comes equipped with speedloaders for quickly filling the magazine. This is accomplished by inserting the speedloader tube against the studs visible on the lower edge of the receiver on either side of the loading port. Once positioned against the studs, the speedloader button is shoved forward to recharge the magazine. Speedloaders, however, are bulky, cumbersome to carry and hold only four or five rounds of ammunition. Tactical (partial) reloads using speedloaders is difficult unless the magazine can accommodate all the ammunition in the speedloader. Moreover, ammunition carried in speedloaders is essentially “fixed.” Once the ammunition is loaded into a speedloader, it is essentially in place and cannot be readily changed if the tactical situation demands. The user is thus restricted as to the types of ammunition available, basically as many of the cumbersome speedloaders as he has with different types of ammunition in each. Use of speedloaders thus actually degrades one of the tactical shotgun’s greatest assets &#8211; its flexibility. It is for these reasons that the value of devices such as speedloader tubes is questioned by many professionals. Not only do they have all the disadvantages mentioned above, speedloaders are only marginally faster than manually reloading the gun from belt carriers, “on the gun” carriers, or over the shoulder bandoleers.</p>



<p>Our informal test of the M4 Super 90/XM1014 revealed that it is a superb semiautomatic tactical shotgun. The gun is very well balanced. It handled and pointed well, despite the awkward appearance of the collapsible buttstock. With the semi-pistol grip or full pistol grip stock installed, the gun handles even better, but we suspect that most operators will retain the sliding stock. The sliding stock is easily removed by pressing a release, turning 90 degrees and sliding the stock off to the rear, leaving the pistol grip in place. The collapsible stock configuration thus provides the greatest degree of tactical flexibility. The cross bolt safety is located at the rear of the trigger guard. It has an oversized and uniquely shaped head that is difficult to mistake for anything else, even if the user is wearing gloves, and can be reversed for left-handed users. As stated, the XM1014 functioned flawlessly with every type of ammunition we fed through it, from low brass # 7 1/2 light target loads to 3 inch magnum slugs. The example that we tested patterned well with a modified choke tube, placing all 12 “00” buckshot slugs on a silhouette target at 25 meters. Slug accuracy at 50 meters was impressive. Tactical Foster-type slugs fired from the M4 Super 90/XM1014 impacted essentially at point of aim with all rounds remaining within an approximately 4.75 inch circle. Brenneke or Sauvestre slugs would almost certainly be more accurate. The XM1014 field strips quickly and easily without tools, unless one counts the charging handle, which is withdrawn from the bolt carrier and used to remove the trigger group and disassemble the gas system for cleaning.</p>



<p>What didn’t we like about the M4 Super 90/XM1014? First the fact that it is a semiautomatic. This writer may be considered a troglodyte, but he still prefers a slide action gun for tactical work, as even the best semiautomatic will not function with the full spectrum of tactical ammunition now available to military and law enforcement agencies and stoppages are easier to clear with a slide action gun. We find that manually cycling semiautomatic shotguns to operate the gun with non-lethal ammunition to be cumbersome due to the (usually) small charging handle and the necessity to remove a hand from the gun to accomplish the task. We should note, however, that this is a subjective judgement and must be balanced against the fact that a gas-operated semiautomatic shotgun such as the M4 Super 90/XM1014 greatly reduces felt recoil, thus enhancing accuracy. For the average soldier or law enforcement officer, semiautomatic operation also enhances target engagement and eliminates the possibility of “short stroking” the gun, thereby causing a stoppage. All of the preceding attributes are decided advantages in a tactical shotgun. These attributes, coupled with the influx of women and smaller framed men into law enforcement and the military lead us to the conclusion that the semiautomatic tactical shotgun will gradually replace slide action guns, even though the former will not cycle with all types of ammunition and slide action guns can be equipped with recoil reducers. In the final analysis, the user will have to judge for himself which type of shotgun best suits his agency’s requirements. The sole minor criticism we have of the HK/Benelli M4 Super 90/XM1014 is the recoil spring tube that protrudes almost a foot to the rear of the gun’s receiver when the stock is removed and the gun used with only the pistol grip in place. Despite the fact that the tube is used to retain the stock and pistol grip, we found that it was somewhat inconvenient when the stock was removed and the gun was used with pistol grip only. Again, this is a subjective judgement and others may not find this to be the case due to differences in human anatomy. This one minor complaint must be balanced against the other excellent attributes of the shotgun.</p>



<p>Overall, the HK/Benelli M4 Super 90/XM1014 offers the user desiring a semiautomatic tactical shotgun what is arguably the best “off the shelf” semiautomatic tactical shotgun available today. It is reliable, relatively lightweight, well balanced and has outstanding ergonomics. It is without doubt the most flexible semiautomatic tactical shotgun available not only in terms of function, but from the standpoint of configuration. The M4 Super 90 can be arranged into virtually any tactical configuration imaginable, from entry gun with 14 inch (355mm) barrel and pistol grip to full length barrel and fixed buttstock. The MIL-STD-1913 rail allows employment of any standard optic or night vision device. We can thus close by stating that any agency that has a requirement for a semiautomatic tactical shotgun would do well to follow the US military’s lead and look very closely at the HK/Benelli M4 Super 90.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silencer Picks for Y2K</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/silencer-picks-for-y2k/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Paulson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suppressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silencer Picks for Y2K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y2K]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SAR’s Suppressor Technology Editor Al Paulson was recently asked what he thought were good choices for someone’s “Kit” in the event of needing suppression on a firearm. The ensuing article provides some interesting perspectives and choices, and we hope this helps answer some questions for the readers- Dan]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Al Paulson</p>



<p>SAR’s Suppressor Technology Editor Al Paulson was recently asked what he thought were good choices for someone’s “Kit” in the event of needing suppression on a firearm. The ensuing article provides some interesting perspectives and choices, and we hope this helps answer some questions for the readers- Dan</p>



<p>Who knows if this Y2K business is media hype or not? Friends who are computer programmers disagree. One suggests fixing code is simplistic stuff. Another points out that even the first release of Windows 98 was not Y2K compliant. He suggests that the Y2K problem is much more subtle and pervasive than a lot of people believe, and not all the Y2K problems will appear on the first day of the Year 2000. There are several minefields that will appear on subsequent critical dates as well. He also points out that a lot of public utilities use an archaic programing language that has not been taught at the college level in decades, so there are a limited number of qualified programmers to resolve Y2K issues for the many mainframes still using this old language. His personal solution to the Y2K issue was to buy a generator, bury a fuel tank, put in a well with hand pump, stockpile gallon cans of freeze-dried food and crates of ammo, and add some sound suppressors to his kit. That got me to thinking. What sound suppressors would I want in my Y2K kit? They would fall into several mission categories: small game hunting, big game hunting, general tactical, and long-range tactical.</p>



<p>Selecting silencers for a Y2K kit is somewhat daunting, since this is the golden age of silencer design. The state of the art has grown considerably in the last decade, and the industry is rich with talented companies making diverse and outstanding products. Some of these manufacturers are relatively large and well known, while others are small shops catering to small but fiercely loyal clienteles. Both big and small companies produce some really excellent products. The net result is that the consumer has a plethora of outstanding sound suppressors to choose from. The following are some of my personal favorites, which I hope will stimulate your thought processes concerning what your own needs may be. You may wish to add a few suppressors or integrally suppressed arms that will serve similar needs, be they from these or other manufacturers.</p>



<p>If food availability becomes a problem, the easiest way to supplement your existing stores is the hunting of small game. If local laws permit the use of suppressed firearms for hunting, you will be at a social and strategic advantage by using such tools.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Small Game Hunting</h2>



<p>The criteria for selecting the best silenced arm for hunting small game will depend upon several factors. Can you hunt openly (i.e., with a rifle) or must you hunt surreptitiously (i.e., with a concealed handgun) to avoid alarming nearby farmers or residents, or to avoid giving away the location of your favorite hunting ground? Is visual stealth important? This would favor an integrally silenced arm, which the uninitiated will view as a target-barreled gun. Or is maximum service life more important? This would favor the use of a visually conspicuous muzzle can. Finally, does your skill level permit the use of a handgun to feed the family?<br>I now live in a semi-rural area that features individual homes and small subdivisions interspersed with small farms and woodlots. Hunting is frowned upon but small game abounds. Since hikers are welcome, I could go for a walk at dawn or dusk (when most game is especially active) with a day pack and an integrally silenced pistol hidden under a long shirt. It would be a simple matter to use a single well-placed shot to collect a rabbit, squirrel or game bird for the pot within the 50 yard effective range of a good silenced pistol.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="172" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-72.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16794" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-72.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-72-300x74.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-72-600x147.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">D.H. Meltonís Sound-Master integrally silenced Ruger 10/22 can deliver a sound signature that is within 2 decibels of action noise when using subsonic ammunition, or it can deliver maximum practical subsonic projectile velocity by using high velocity ammunition, when maximizing penetration is important.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>In fact, I regularly did this when I was a graduate student at the University of Alaska—Fairbanks. With the blessing of campus security, I’d hike or ski the two miles to campus with a Ruger Mark I (not silenced to conform to local game laws). Since most of the two miles were woods, and since homes and cabins were rare, I frequently collected several snowshoe hares or grouse for the evening meal on the way home. All UAF security asked of me was that I keep the gun unloaded while on campus. While one saw people with long arms on campus routinely in those gentler days (often grad students who needed protection while conducting field research in bear country), it still would have been tacky to walk from class to class with a rifle on my shoulder. The pistol resided in my day pack, which was a ubiquitous and therefore invisible accouterment of campus life. The pistol was a graceful and discreet solution for adding meat to the table of a starving grad student.</p>



<p>If both game and neighbors are plentiful, my own bias would be to use an integrally silenced pistol that features a tensioned barrel to minimize barrel harmonics. Such pistols by manufactures like Gemtech, Sound Technology, and the D.H. Melton Company (to name a few) can be easily holstered and carried unobtrusively. This assumes the operator limits his or her shots to a range where first-round kills are assured and great care is taken to ensure that no livestock, hikers, or buildings lie behind the target.</p>



<p>If you can hunt openly in a rural setting, then I like a good silenced .22 rifle, which will greatly extend a hunter’s effective range. If visual stealth or maximum suppression are required, then I’m particularly fond of D.H. Melton’s Sound-Master integrally silenced Ruger 10/22, which can deliver a sound signature that is within 2 decibels of action noise when using subsonic ammunition, or it can deliver maximum practical subsonic projectile velocity by using high velocity ammunition, when maximizing penetration is important.</p>



<p>If I were cynical about the duration of problems following Y2K, then I’d opt for a muzzle can rather than an integrally suppressed .22 rimfire. Any integrally suppressed arm will have a finite lifespan, limited by the infinitesimally slow accumulation of lead and hard carbon residue inside the suppressor wherever there is porting. I have x-rays documenting this process, but I can’t publish them without giving up the design secrets of the manufacturer. For most end-users, this process is so slow as to be irrelevant; you’ll be able to leave these guns to your grandkids. But if you expect to hunt game for food on a frequent and long-term basis, then using a well-designed muzzle can might increase the number of rounds you could put through the system tenfold.</p>



<p>Perhaps the most thought-provoking muzzle can design in the marketplace is the Millennium .22 suppressor from Sound Technology. It’s very quiet. It’s as tough as a Russian T34 tank. Lead and carbon accumulation is minimal. Furthermore, the design will probably tolerate more lead and carbon build-up than any design I’ve seen, which means it could well deliver the longest service life. Finally, the Millennium’s mounting system is practical in the extreme.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="273" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-60.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16802" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-60.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-60-300x117.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-60-600x234.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Sound Technology&#8217;s Millennium&#8217;s suppressor has a novel mounting system: a 5/8 inch, hardened steel stud with NF, left-hand threads. The muzzle of a heavy (target-weight) rifle or pistol barrel is counterbored, crowned and threaded to accept this stud.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>For mounting to a rifle or pistol, it features a 5/8 inch, hardened steel stud with NF, left-hand threads. The muzzle of a heavy (target-weight) rifle or pistol barrel is counterbored, crowned and threaded to accept this stud. This arrangement has a number of practical advantages. (1) The new barrel crown is protected by the deep, threaded socket. (2) The use of internal threading in front of the new crown eliminates any expansion of the bore that might be caused by the use of conventional outside threading. Such expansion adversely affects accuracy. (3) The use of left-hand threading ensures that the muzzle can tightens to the weapon with each shot, since the barrels use RH rifling so the resulting torque from each shot is applied in a right-handed vector. (4) No external thread protector is required. (5) This design assures proper axial alignment and it compensates for face wear over the long haul. (6) The same suppressor can be swapped between rifles and pistols. Sound Technology’s Millennium suppressor would be part of a very practical and durable system for hunting small game after the dawn of Y2K and well into the new millennium.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Big Game Hunting</h2>



<p>For most residents of the United States, deer are the most readily accessible large game. Decades of experience hunting big game in Alaska has given me some definite biases. One of these biases is my confidence in the efficacy of heavy bullets of large diameter. My standard gun for bear protection was a Winchester Model 95 in .405 caliber. It stopped three bears at very close range with a single shot each time. Another of my favorites was the .44 Special round, which proved to be very accurate and effective on the black-tailed deer of Kodiak and Afognak, consistently providing one-shot kills. Coincidentally, this is a subsonic round and well suited to employment with a silencer. An integrally suppressed Ruger 77/44 rifle would be my first choice for discreetly taking deer-sized game.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="148" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-66.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16799" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-66.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-66-300x63.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-66-600x127.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The suppressed Ruger 77/44 from John&#8217;s Guns is an especially attractive system, featuring a 16.25 inch barrel and an overall length of just 39 inches. More importantly, it has a superbly quiet sound signature, and it&#8217;s as accurate as the unsuppressed rifle.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The suppressed Ruger 77/44 from John’s Guns is an especially attractive system. Featuring a 16.25 inch barrel, and a 1.25&#215;20 inch suppressor tube of 4140 steel finished in a handsome but discreet matt blue, this suppressed Ruger 77/44 has an overall length of just 39 inches. More importantly, it has a superbly quiet sound signature, and it’s as accurate as the unsuppressed rifle. This system from John’s Guns is my suppressed rifle of choice for the taking of deer-sized animals.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">General Tactical</h2>



<p>Any tactical requirements related to Y2K would probably relate to a possible breakdown of the social order, which could manifest itself as looting, or as an increased incidence of robbery, burglary, and carjackings. For protection from robbery and carjackings, it’s hard to beat a concealed and unsuppressed handgun of major caliber, preferably in .45 ACP according to my biases. For home defense, however, it’s hard to beat a 5.56x45mm carbine fitted with a sound suppressor to preserve the family’s short-term and long-term hearing if the weapon must be fired. One of my favorite systems is a select-fire M16 with 11.5 inch barrel and a quick-mount suppressor. A quick-mount suppressor is handy because some tactical situations call for making as much noise as possible, such as the need to gain temporary fire superiority to disengage from a superior force or to flank the enemy using fire-and-movement tactics.</p>



<p>One of my favorite quick-mount cans for the M16 family of weapons is the Model M4 3L sound suppressor from Suppressed Tactical Weapons. STW’s Model M4 3L features a patented three-lug quick-mounting system which is the most robust and trouble-free quick mount in the business. Designed by Carl O’Quinn and Andy Andrews, STW’s M4 3L suppressor has just four parts. The rear end cap and suppressor guts are machined from a single block of solid titanium. This ingenious monobloc design does not use baffles and spacers in any conventional sense. In my opinion, STW’s very efficient, one-piece suppression module represents one of the most important technological advances in the history of suppressor design.</p>



<p>Crafted entirely out of G2 titanium, the M4 3L suppressor has an overall length of 8.5 inches. Since the quick mount slips over the weapon’s barrel for 1.6 inches, the suppressor only adds 6.9 inches to the overall length of the weapon. The diameter of the silencer is 1.3 inches and the weight is an astonishingly light 14.0 ounces. The M4 3L runs 6-11 ounces lighter than the other quick-mount systems in the marketplace. Only the superbly crafted, screw-mount titanium Viper Model 3016 from the Special Op’s Shop is comparably light, but this smallest Viper variant produces a much louder sound signature. An M16 carbine with STW’s M4 3L suppressor provides an outstanding system for the up-close and personal requirements of family defense and the repelling of boarders.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Long-Range Tactical</h2>



<p>Some folks live in open areas where they can see trouble coming from a considerable distance. To deal with such problems, it’s hard to beat a precision rifle chambered for 7.62x51mm ammunition. My own bias would be to use a system that featured a sound suppressor since, as the old Finnish proverb explains, “A silencer does not make a soldier silent, but it does make him invisible.” Using a suppressed rifle greatly facilities the ability to engage a superior force at a distance.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="330" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-53.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16811" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-53.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-53-300x141.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-53-600x283.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Gemtech&#8217;s TPR-S suppressor is very quiet with supersonic ammo, and it has a large enough bullet passage to use with EBR subsonic ammo when the rifle barrel has a 1 in 10 twist rate.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Furthermore, if the rifle features a barrel with a 1 in 10 inch twist, then the operator could also use high-performance, 200 grain 7.62x51mm Precision Bonded Subsonic (PBS) hollowpoint ammunition from Engel Ballistics Research that will give accurate shot placement, good penetration, and reliable expansion at subsonic velocities. Thus the operator could place high velocity shots reliably out to perhaps 800 yards using conventional match-grade service ammunition or 1,000 yards using VLD ammo. This same rifle could also be used to provide virtually silent hits into 1 MOA at 100 yards by using EBR’s PBS rounds. This would be a very versatile system suitable for a wide variety of hunting or tactical applications.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="183" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-60.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16805" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-60.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-60-300x78.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-60-600x157.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Gemtech&#8217;s TPR-S .30 caliber sound suppressor features Greg Latka&#8217;s patented Bi-Lock mounting system, which includes a spring-loaded quick mount in the rear of the suppressor that snaps onto two asymmetric lugs of the Gemtech muzzle brake.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>There are a number of outstanding .30 caliber suppressors in the marketplace. One of my favorites is the TPR-S suppressor from Gemtech. The TPR-S is very quiet with supersonic ammo, and it has a large enough bullet passage to use with subsonic ammo when the rifle barrel has a 1 in 10 twist rate. (Some other .30 caliber cans have tight bores that require a 1 in 8 rate of twist with subsonic ammo.) One of the best features of the Gemtech suppressor is that it features a spring-loaded quick mount that snaps onto two asymmetric lugs of a patented muzzle brake called the Bi-Lock. Not only does this allow the operator to mount or dismount the can in a few seconds, it also means that the rifle returns to the same zero every time the suppressor is mounted. Screw-mount suppressors will frequently require re-zeroing every time they are mounted, unless a torque wrench is used to mount them with the same number of inch-pounds every time the can is installed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final Thoughts</h2>



<p>Is all this concern about Y2K insightful or just so much hokum? Only time will tell. While you might never use that new-in-the-box generator or a basement full of freeze-dried food, a careful collection of suppressed firearms would serve you well for years to come, whether or not you and your loved ones are bitten by the Millennium Bug. A good suppressed .22 rimfire rifle or pistol, a silenced .44 Special rifle, a 5.56mm carbine with quick mount suppressor, and a silenced rifle of .30 caliber should prove to be practical tools that will cover a wide spectrum of requirements in the new millennium. But this selection is a very personal one, based upon my own experiences and biases. What suppressed weapons would best fill your own needs as the new millennium approaches? I hope the preceding discussion has stimulated your own decision-making process.</p>



<p>D.H. Melton Company<br>Dept. SAR<br>1739 E. Broadway Road, Suite 1-161<br>Tempe, AZ 85282<br>phone 602-967-6218, fax 602-902-0783</p>



<p>Gemtech<br>Dept. SAR<br>P.O. Box 3538<br>Boise, ID 83701<br>phone 208-939-7222, fax 208-939-7804<br>URL<a href="http://www.gem-tech.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> http://www.gem-tech.com</a></p>



<p>Engel Ballistic Research, Inc.<br>Dept. SAR<br>544A Alum Creek Road<br>Smithville, Texas 78957<br>phone 512-360-5327, fax 512-360-2652<br>e-mail <a href="mailto:engelbr@swbell.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">engelbr@swbell.net</a></p>



<p>John’s Guns<br>Dept. SAR<br>3010A Hwy. 155 North<br>Palestine, TX 75801<br>phone 903-729-8251, fax 903-723-4653</p>



<p>Sound Technology<br>Dept. SAR<br>P.O. Box 391<br>Pelham, AL 35124<br>phone and fax 205-664-5860<br>e-mail <a href="mailto:rem700p@sprintmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">rem700p@sprintmail.com</a><br>URL <a href="http://www.hypercon.com/soundtech" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://www.hypercon.com/soundtech</a></p>



<p>Suppressed Tactical Weapons, Inc.<br>Dept. SAR<br>6911 Bill Poole Road<br>Rougemont, NC 27572<br>phone 919-471-6778, fax 919-471-3314<br>e-mail <a href="mailto:raymonda@earthlink.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">raymonda@earthlink.net</a></p>



<p>Special Op’s Shop<br>Dept. SAR<br>P.O. Box 978<br>Madisonville, TN 37354<br>phone 423-442-7180<br>URL <a href="http://www.compfxnet.com/opshop" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://www.compfxnet.com/opshop</a></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic Weapons in Miniature, Part I: “Belt Fed Guns”</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/automatic-weapons-in-miniature-part-i-belt-fed-guns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Segel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 1999 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1 (Oct 1999)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automatic Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automatic Weapons in Miniature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part I: “Belt Fed Guns”]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert G. Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Maxim M1910]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V3N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Producing a miniature machine gun that actually fires ammunition provides a whole different set of problems because as the scale reduces, so do the tolerances that, ultimately, must be maintained to some degree to provide safety when dealing with chamber pressures and other forces that affect the working parts. A machine gun has many working parts that must act in unison under stress. Thus, certain liberties must be allowed to compensate for this. While the operating principles of the weapon may still be adhered to, true scaling of the internal parts is generally not possible because it must be chambered for a commercially available cartridge which, in all likelihood, is not to scale. Besides the multitude of manufacturing difficulties, current law prohibits the manufacture of “new” functional machine guns (in any size) so there are extremely few miniature machine guns that are capable of shooting.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Robert G. Segel</p>



<p>Producing a miniature machine gun that actually fires ammunition provides a whole different set of problems because as the scale reduces, so do the tolerances that, ultimately, must be maintained to some degree to provide safety when dealing with chamber pressures and other forces that affect the working parts. A machine gun has many working parts that must act in unison under stress. Thus, certain liberties must be allowed to compensate for this. While the operating principles of the weapon may still be adhered to, true scaling of the internal parts is generally not possible because it must be chambered for a commercially available cartridge which, in all likelihood, is not to scale. Besides the multitude of manufacturing difficulties, current law prohibits the manufacture of “new” functional machine guns (in any size) so there are extremely few miniature machine guns that are capable of shooting.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="377" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-73.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16819" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-73.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-73-300x162.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-73-600x323.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The full auto Tippmann Model 1919A4 is parkerized and mounted on the M2 tripod with T&amp;E mechanism. Chambered for the .22 LR and furnished with metal ammo cans and non-disintegrating plastic link belts, this is the most common Tippmann encountered with 123 full auto models being produced.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Without a doubt, the best-known fully functional belt fed miniature machine guns were made by Dennis Tippmann and his Tippmann Arms Company. Starting out in the 1970s producing 1/2 scale Model 1862 Gatling guns he then turned his attention in the mid 1980s (when the law allowed the manufacture of “new” machine guns) to producing in 1/2 scale the classic Browning series of tripod mounted belt fed machine guns.</p>



<p>What can be said about the Browning guns that haven’t been said many times before in a legion of publications? They are the epitome of classic functional design that makes them instantly recognizable with an operating principle that is simplicity itself as well as proving itself in combat as being a true workhorse under a multitude of adverse conditions. Tippmann chose to recreate the .30 caliber Model 1917A1 water-cooled and Model 1919A4 air-cooled machine guns and the venerable .50 caliber M2 HB “Ma Deuce”. The guns were live working models and offered in semi-automatic or, upon special request, ATF registered full automatic versions. They came complete with tripod, non-disintegrating plastic link or cloth belts, metal or wood ammo boxes, technical manual, operating chart and fitted oak arms chest. Chambered for the .22 Long Rifle and .22 Magnum (for the M2 HB), they provided a source of full auto fun at an affordable price. Though some parts are not 100% accurate in scaling detail (such as the slightly larger trigger) due to its functionality, they are nonetheless wonderful representations of the larger versions that they copy and there is absolutely no mistaking what they are. They truly do capture the essence of the Browning.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="429" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-68.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16820" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-68.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-68-300x184.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-68-600x368.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The full auto Tippmann Model 1917 WC is blued overall with walnut grips and brass water jacket end caps and is chambered for the .22 LR cartridge. It was mounted (incorrectly) on a M2 tripod complete with the traverse and elevation (T&amp;E) mechanism and supplied with early style wood ammunition boxes and cloth belts. It has a cyclic rate of fire of 650 rounds per minute (which is about 200 rounds per minute faster than the original) and is just 191/2 inches long. Though there are filling and drainage plugs in the water jacket, the water jacket is ornamental and should not be filled with water. There is no internal steam tube inside the water jacket to provide an escape for steam pressure buildup. According to a document supplied by Dennis Tippmann, this is the rarest of the guns he produced with only twenty-five examples in full auto ever produced.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>After the fall of the USSR, two young Master Russian Metal Workers named Sergey Alekseevich and Sergey Vyacheslavovich from the Central Military Museum in Moscow turned their attention to making extremely detailed, fully functional but non-firing miniatures in an effort to keep their talents honed and occupied. They set up a little shop in an undisclosed location and due to current political Mafia pressure they sell nothing in the former Soviet Union and their location is a closely guarded secret. Using some ages old milling equipment and drafting techniques often consisting of merely a pencil, straight edge and calipers, they created in exquisite detail, and in excruciatingly small limited numbers, versions of the Thompson, German MP-38 and Russian PPsH-41 sub machine guns as well as the Russian SG43 and SGM Goryunov heavy machine guns and the Russian Maxim Model 1910 on a Sokolov wheeled mount. Some of these miniatures even come with scaled down dummy ammunition that will actually feed, chamber and eject. Truly astounding and remarkable in detail! Their work is displayed in several military museums throughout Russia such as the Museum of Military Power in Rovno, Ukraine, the Military Power Museum in Ezhevsk, Russia and the Military Power Museum in Moscow. The three gun set of the Goryunov Model 1943 (SG43) and its further modification to the SGMs were originally ordered by two Swedish merchants for donation to the Swedish Arms Museum in Stockholm but the order was ultimately canceled due to the volatile political environment in Russia and the guns were then sold. Their craftsmanship has been acknowledged here in the states by winning a number of medals at the annual NRA conventions the past several years.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="638" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-69.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16841" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-69.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-69-300x273.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-69-600x547.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Tippmann .22 LR cloth belt loading machine of a push/pull type came in a fitted oak box. Belts were 100 rounds in length.</figcaption></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="413" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-67.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16842" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-67.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-67-300x177.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-67-600x354.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Original sales information from the Tippmann Arms Company.</figcaption></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="249" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-60.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16843" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-60.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-60-300x107.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-60-600x213.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The full auto Tippmann Model .50 HB is parkerized and mounted on the appropriate larger M3 tripod with T&amp;E mechanism. Chambered for the .22 Winchester Magnum round, this gun, like its big brother, packs a wallop. With a rate of fire of 650 rounds per minute, it weighs in at 81/4 pounds and is 261/2 inches long. It was furnished with metal ammo boxes and cloth belts. Tippmann produced only 44 of these guns in full auto.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Another master miniature arms maker was Frank Adlam of Australia. He built just 30 miniature weapons in 1/4 and 1/8 scale in his 25 year career ranging from swords (4) to rifles (7), pistols (6), machine guns (8) and artillery pieces (5). A professional soldier for 32 years, he rose to the rank of Warrant Officer and Master Gunner and proofed ammunition and tested weapons for the Australian Army and Navy. He set up a little shop in a tiny radar hut in 1957 at the Port Wakefield Range in South Australia and taught himself to be a draftsman, forger, fitter, wheelwright, molder and turner. He even made much of the equipment he needed to produce his miniatures. He created wonderfully accurate miniatures all through the 1960s and showed them at numerous shows in Australia until he had a serious heart attack in 1972 and was forced to cease his beloved avocation. He died in 1982. His models were so accurate that when his widow attempted to sell the collection the Adelaide, South Australia police determined them to be dangerous, illegal weapons under South Australia’s gun laws and threatened to confiscate and de-activate them by welding them up. A friend of the family clandestinely spirited them away into hiding in another Australian state while appealing the police ruling on behalf of the Adlam family. It took nearly ten years but the Australian Parliament finally exempted the Adlam Collection from any firearms laws which allowed the family to sell the collection.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="488" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-50.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16844" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-50.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-50-300x209.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-50-600x418.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This Skoda Z.B. 37 machine gun was made in Spain and is in 1/3 scale. It is a &#8220;mass produced&#8221; miniature and lacks most of the refinements and details found in a hand tooled miniature but is notable for the rarity of the subject matter.</figcaption></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="692" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-38.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16845" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-38.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-38-300x297.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-38-600x593.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-38-100x100.jpg 100w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This Vickers Mk I water-cooled machine gun on the Mk IV tripod is rendered in 1/2 scale. An apprentice at Enfield Lock in Britain, as a one of a kind project to demonstrate his machining skills, built this Vickers in the late 1940s. The length of apprenticeship was typically five years when the student then graduated to full machinist at the famed British government arsenal. Standing just 11 inches high and 18 inches in length, this little hand made beauty captures the essence of the original.</figcaption></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="286" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-33.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16846" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-33.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-33-300x123.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-33-600x245.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">World War II Russian Goryunov Model 1943 (SG43) on wheeled field mount in 1/7 scale. If it weren&#8217;t for the dime, you&#8217;d think it was the full size real thing. Note that the cocking handle is a horizontal wood grip directly below the spade grips.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The skill required to produce such exacting miniatures is achieved by only a small handful of craftsmen worldwide from such countries as the United States, Italy, England, Australia, Spain and Russia. Working generally from home workshops a single gun, from drawings to finished product, can take literally thousands of man-hours. Production can be a single example to a “production run” of maybe twenty or so guns. The time and effort put into these miniatures are not conducive to earning a living from such an endeavor. They are made for the love of the challenge and a passion to create a tangible object of their skill. Whether hand forged centuries ago or with the help of modern computer assisted milling equipment available today, these Lilliputian firearms are truly masterpieces that can be appreciated by all.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="442" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-30.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16847" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-30.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-30-300x189.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-30-600x379.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Russian Maxim Model 1910 water-cooled machine gun on the Sokolov wheeled field mount in 1/4 scale. Made in Russia by the Imperial Miniature Armory in 1994, they made only about ten of these guns in slightly different configurations. Painted white to represent winter camouflage, it features the armor shield, &#8220;tractor cap&#8221; water jacket filler (so they could put snow in the jacket), wood wheels and spokes, cloth and brass spaced and tabbed ammunition belt with dummy cartridges, fluted water jacket and proper cork and chain assembly. Fully functioning with 169 parts, the gun will extract cartridges from the belt, chamber and eject them. This beauty is only 11 inches long with an overall length of 14 inches. This gun was shown at the annual NRA show in Phoenix in 1996 and won a medal for best miniature.</figcaption></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="432" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16848" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-18-300x185.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-18-600x370.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This incredible trio of classic water cooled machine guns, the German Maxim MG08 on sled mount, the German Maxim MG08/15 and the British Maxim Enfield Model 1893 on the Mk IV tripod are one of a kind miniatures in 1/8 scale. Each one fits in the palm of your hand! Made in Australia in the late 1960s by Frank Adlam, they were in danger of being destroyed by the Australian Government as being &#8220;dangerous weapons&#8221;. Hidden away for many years while appealing the government&#8217;s draconian ruling, the government finally relented and de-classified them as firearms.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V3N1 (October 1999)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
