<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>V4N1 (Oct 2000) &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/category/articles/articles-by-issue-articles/v4/v4n1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 18:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SITREP: October 2000</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/sitrep-october-2000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITREP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Dan Shea It’s time. Here we are in October already (Although due to popular demand, we at SAR worked furiously to get each issue out a week early over the summer so that our cover date is now a month ahead- no skipped issues, no post dating, simply our response to what the readers [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Dan Shea</strong><br><br>It’s time. Here we are in October already (Although due to popular demand, we at SAR worked furiously to get each issue out a week early over the summer so that our cover date is now a month ahead- no skipped issues, no post dating, simply our response to what the readers asked for- a cover date that was ahead of delivery time). You asked for it, you got it.<br><br>Once again, it is time. The election is coming, and this one is probably the most important to our Constitution as any that I can remember. Let’s get the vote out- call friends, hell, drive them to the polling booth after treating them to a cheeseburger, just like the Democrats do with their constituents. We need to win this one. Not gaining the presidency back from “Clinton-Gore” will be VERY detrimental to our freedom.<br><br>It’s also time for something else. Attorney Jim Jeffries just contacted me, and the 1934 Group lawsuits are being filed today, as I write this (August 10). The basics? Kent Lomont (and 7 others, including Sheriff Samuel Frank of Vermont and Stephen Hose, Chief of the Clinton, Indiana Police Department) v. Summers (Secretary of the Treasury) and Buckles (BATF Director). The filing is thirty-six pages; 69 paragraphs, and has four main counts: violation of taxpayer privacy; violation of the Tenth Amendment; unlawful veto of Secretary’s duty to collect taxes; and arbitrary and capricious acts. The suit seeks a mandatory injunction and declaratory judgment that the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) signature requirement in the two offending regulations is null and void.<br><br>The goal here? To stop the de facto gun control that has been exercised by some local law enforcement agencies by refusing to sign Forms 1, 4, and 5 for legitimate citizens attempting to transfer NFA items. Basically, some municipalities have been violating citizen’s rights, and being quite unrepentant about it.<br><br>The chances of success? I would rate them pretty darned good. Attorneys Halbrook and Jeffries are professionals on the firearms side, and are both very thorough. They have what it takes. While there are no guarantees with the courts the way they can be, this group of counts is carefully designed to “Scattergun” the current abuses of the CLEO signature requirement, and to make for a good, solid approach to knocking down that requirement.<br><br>The results? Consider for yourself. A growing method of stopping Americans from obtaining NFA firearms has been the conspiracy of certain anti Second Amendment government officials and even some ATF agents in a few areas going around to chiefs of police and Sheriffs, and basically telling them not to sign that CLEO box on the back of the Transfer forms. No signature, no approval on Form for transfer. Examples would include Dade County Florida, and Houston. There are hundreds of other areas where only “Friends” of the local administration might get a signature, or not even that.<br><br>There are many violations of the basic precepts of the United States of America at work here- these are not just Second Amendment issues. Example- who authorizes the Federal Government to have unfunded mandates by local law enforcement officials- as in work to do backgrounds to ensure signatures? How can a local LE be required to make a statement that he has “No knowledge” that there might be problems with an certain individual, or no problems? There are privacy issues, tax issues, State’s Rights issues, so many issues that it is hard to describe them with out a 36 page brief.<br><br>This writer sincerely hopes that the courts will immediately recognize the problems, and put this issue where it should be. No CLEO signature requirement on the Forms. We go through an FBI background check including fingerprinting anyway, so what has local LE got to do with it? This is a TAX COLLECTION ISSUE, NOT A GUN CONTROL LAW.<br><br>SAR wishes the best of luck to the complainants and attorneys in this case and will update the readers as it goes.<br><br>-Dan</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industry News: October 2000</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/industry-news-october-2000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Hausman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert Hausman Overall, total U.S. firearm production increased about 2.7% in 1998, as compared to the total output in 1997. The entire firearms production of U.S. firms during 1998 was 3,725,191, versus 3,661,455 in 1997. These, the latest available figures, are contained in the Annual Firearms Manufacturing And Export Report released through a Freedom [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Robert Hausman</strong><br><br>Overall, total U.S. firearm production increased about 2.7% in 1998, as compared to the total output in 1997. The entire firearms production of U.S. firms during 1998 was 3,725,191, versus 3,661,455 in 1997. These, the latest available figures, are contained in the Annual Firearms Manufacturing And Export Report released through a Freedom of Information Act request by this author from the firearms industry’s regulator, the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco &amp; Firearms.<br><br>While the small rise in production during 1998 is a hopeful sign for a good prognosis of the present state of the industry’s health, it is a far cry from the total numbers of firearms produced in the last several years. For example, in 1996, some 3,874,872 firearms of all types were produced in the U.S. In 1995, the total was 4,246,257. The total guns produced in 1994 was 5,226,566 and in 1993 the total came out to 4,976,289. The jump in sales during 1993, 1994 and 1995 has been largely credited to the efforts of President Clinton in getting the Brady Law and 1994 Crime Law “Assault Weapons” ban debated on and passed in Congress. The gun-buying public reacted in panic believing these laws would largely ban firearms ownership.<br><br>When the 1998 figures are compared to those of 1988, a production decline of 11% is noted. The figures reflect the highly cyclical nature of the firearms industry, as well as the outside factors affecting the roller-coaster type sales trends of firearms which are affected by such factors as increases and decreases in the nation’s crime rate, the political climate related to gun control legislation, the economy, and weather conditions which affect hunting.<br><br>The report also reflects the high concentration of the firearms industry into a relatively few number of volume-producing firms. In fact, the top 30 firearms producing companies accounted for approximately 97% of the total U.S. firearm production.<br><br>Viewed over an 11-year period, handgun production averaged 1,889,417 units annually. When 1998’s handgun production figures are compared to those of 1998, a 32% decline is found in 1998, from 1988. Rifles had a 9% increase in production and shotguns a 4% increase in 1998, compared to 1988’s totals.<br><br><strong>MG &amp; AOW Production</strong><br><br>Looking at specific types of firearms, there were a total of 32,866 machine guns manufactured during 1998, a large decline from the 67,844 made in 1997 but considerably better than the 22,020 machine guns fabricated in 1996, the 9,185 made in 1995 and the 10,248 manufactured in 1994.<br><br>The production for the “Any Other Weapon” category (which includes such things as cane guns, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, smooth bore pistols, etc.) totaled 645 pieces in 1998, a considerable rise from the 118 made in 1997, the 410 produced in 1996, the 110 manufactured in 1995 and the 56 fabricated in 1994.<br><br><strong>Pistols</strong><br><br>For the year 1998, the total production of pistols was 960,365. This breaks down to 184,836 pistols produced in up to .22 caliber, 50,936 in up to .25 caliber, 62,338 up to .32 caliber, 98,266 in up to the .380 chambering, 284,374 to 9mm, and 279,615 in up to .50 caliber.<br><br>Note: the report groups handguns, though of differing chamberings, into the broad caliber designations stated above. Thus, each category can include firearms in calibers other than those listed. For example, the pistols in up to .50 caliber category, also includes .45 ACP chambered pistols which comprise a far greater share of the total production than pistols produced in .50 caliber.<br><br>The American public still favors pistols over revolvers. Those chambered for .22 rimfire and centerfire calibers of 9mm and above are showing the greatest volume. Looking back over the last few years, 184,836 pistols were manufactured to .22 caliber in 1998, compared to 250,983 in 1997, some 204,819 in 1996. A total of 260,059 pistols in .22 caliber were made in 1995, a total of 456,490 in 1994, and 452,509 in 1993.<br><br>Pistol production to .25 caliber has remained fairly stable during the last couple of years with 50,936 produced in 1998; 43,103 in 1997; 41, 156 in 1996; 51, 025 in 1995; 110,732 in 1994; and a whopping total of 277,306 in 1993.<br><br>Pistols to .32 caliber totaled 62,338 in 1998, a rise from the 43,623 produced in 1997 and the 20,709 made in 1996, the 19,220 manufactured in 1995, the 29,818 made in 1994 and the 52,268 fabricated in 1993. Pistols in the .380 caliber range, were produced to the tune of 98,266 in 1998, a sharp decline from the 154,046 of the year before as well as the 165,789 made in 1996, the 182,802 of 1995, the 313,915 of 1994 and the incredible 508,469 manufactured in 1993.<br><br>During 1998, a total of 284,374 pistols in the 9mm segment were made, representing the largest volume segment of the pistol market and a small drop from the 303,212 produced in 1997. A total of 319,696 9mm pistols were made in 1996; 398,467 produced in 1995; 752,801 fabricated in 1994 and 586,039 produced during 1993. Pistol production up to .50 caliber (which includes 1911-style .45’s) was 279,615 units in 1998, a jump from 241,110 in 1997, and the 233,364 produced in 1996. A total of 283,693 pistols in up to .50 caliber were made in 1995; 350,580 produced in 1994 and 216,595 manufactured in 1993.<br><br>The nation’s top pistol producer in 1998 was Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co., Inc. with 161,058 units. In 1997, Sturm, Ruger made 174,627 pistols. In second place was Smith &amp; Wesson Corp. with 133,477 pistols. Beretta USA, Corp. came in third with 110,719 pistols. Lorcin Engineering, the incredibly successful manufacturer of affordable self-defense pistols (which has since gone out of business due to litigation filed by anti-gun activists) produced 79,250 pistols, finishing in fourth place for the year. Bryco Arms, another manufacturer of lower-priced pistols, finished fifth with 66,329 units.<br><br>The production totals of other notable makers of pistols during 1998 were: Colt’s Manufacturing 62,757; SIG Arms 54,531; Phoenix Arms, 44,295 pistols; Davis Industries 33,308; Kimber Manufacturing, 31,762; Kel-Tec CNC Industries 19,239; Navegar, Inc. 15,695 and Thompson/Center 11,192.<br><br><strong>Revolvers</strong><br><br>Total revolver production during 1998 was 324,390. Some 68,108 wheelguns were made in up to .22 caliber, 2,602 up to .32 caliber, 77,289 to .38 Special, 73,905 to .357 Magnum, 64,236 to .44 Magnum, and 38,250 up to .50 caliber. As with pistols, the caliber designations of revolvers have been grouped into six broad categories which include other calibers not specifically listed.<br><br>The glory days of revolvers seem to be over. The 324,390 revolvers produced in 1998 are a continuation in decline in production over the last decade as 370,428 were produced in 1997, versus 498,944 in 1996. Some 527,664 revolvers were manufactured in 1995, 586,450 built in 1994, and 562,292 made in 1993.<br><br>In terms of caliber, the lesser chamberings have fallen into disfavor by consumers while the more powerful wheelguns in chamberings of .357 Magnum and above show much more stability in sales. In 1998, 68,108 revolvers were produced in up to .22 caliber, compared to 109,296 in 1997, some 127,119 in 1996, a total of 99,578 in 1995, versus 133,990 in 1994 and 122,614 in 1993.<br><br>Production of revolvers to .32 caliber totaled only 2,602 in 1998, compared to 2,876 in 1997, versus 2,082 in 1996, a total of 4,381 in 1995, a total of 9,160 in 1994 and 10,421 in 1993. Revolvers manufactured to .38 Special numbered 77,289 in 1998, some 85,935 in 1997, versus 115,432 in 1996. Production of .38 revolvers dropped to 92,913 in 1995, jumped to 146,630 in 1994 and climbed to 146,767 in 1993.<br><br>Revolvers chambered for .357 Magnum were manufactured to the tune of 73,905 in 1998, compared to 70,792 in 1997, and 134,910 in 1996. In 1995, there were 210,379 wheelguns made in .357 Magnum, 170,856 in 1994, and 183,328 in 1993. In the .44 Magnum revolver category, 64,236 were made in 1998, compared to 61,324 in 1997, versus 80,456 in 1996. Some 90,144 revolvers up to .44 caliber were produced in 1995; 89,713 manufactured in 1994, and 70,381 made in 1993. Finally, in the to .50 caliber revolver category, 38,250 were manufactured in 1998; 39,205 in 1997; 37,944 in 1996; some 30,259 in 1995; jumping to 36,101 in 1994; and dropping to 28,781 in 1993.<br><br>The top revolver producer in 1998 was Smith &amp; Wesson Corp., having produced some 139,583. The year before, Smith &amp; Wesson produced 159,433 revolvers. In second place was Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co., Inc., with 120,417. Finishing third was North American Arms, Inc. with manufacture of 32,667 of their little .22 revolvers. Coming in at fourth place was Colt’s Manufacturing Co., Inc. with 24,468 wheelguns. Finishing in fifth place was H&amp;R 1871, Inc., with 3,990 (H&amp;R temporarily ceased cartridge revolver production in late 1999 due to the rising cost of liability insurance). The only other manufacturer of revolvers with production of over 1,000 units in 1998 was Freedom Arms, Inc. with the manufacture of 1,163.<br><br><strong>Rifles</strong><br><br>There were a total of 1,345,899 rifles produced in 1998. This figure favorably compares to 1,251,341 in 1997. During 1996, a total of 1,424,319 rifles were made in the U.S., compared to 1,331,780 in 1995, the 1,349,116 manufactured in 1994, and the 1,171,872 rifles fabricated in 1993.<br><br>The top rifle producer was Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co., Inc., with 335,776. The Marlin Firearms Co. was second with 306,164. Production of 275,912 rifles put Remington Arms Co., Inc. in third place. U.S. Repeating Arms produced 112,357 rifles to finish in fourth place. Savage Arms finished fifth with 80,894 rifles.<br><br>Other notable rifle makers during 1998 included: Colt’s Manufacturing Co. with 33,212; H&amp;R 1871 with 29,462; Bushmaster Firearms with 25,610; Thompson/Center Arms with 15,788; Beemiller, Inc. with 28,642; and Olympic Arms, Inc. with 4,481.<br><br><strong>Shotguns</strong><br><br>There were a total of 1,036,520 shotguns produced during 1998, a healthy rise from the 915,978 made in 1997 and the 925,732 produced in 1996. In 1995, a total of 1,173,645 shotguns were manufactured, compared to 1,254,926 in 1994 and 1,148,939 in 1993.O.F. Mossberg &amp; Sons was the number one shotgun producer during 1998 with a total of 383,626 (including its Maverick Arms division). In 1997, Mossberg produced 331,998 shotguns. Remington Arms Co. was second in 1998 with 336,527. H&amp;R 1871 was third having produced 202,908 shotguns. U.S. Repeating Arms was fourth with production of 75,117 and Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co., was fifth with 17,441.<br><br>Other notable shotgun makers during 1998 were: The Marlin Firearms Co. with 2,225; Springfield, Inc. with 6,831; Savage Arms, Inc. with 4,278; and Ithaca Gun with 1,326.<br><br><strong>Miscellaneous</strong><br><br>Finally, a total of 24,506 “miscellaneous” firearms (which apparently did not fit into any of the categories above) produced during 1998. In 1997, a total of 19,669 miscellaneous firearms were produced, some 17,914 in 1996, just 8,607 in 1995, and 10,918 such guns were made in 1994.<br><br><strong>Exportation</strong><br><br>Export markets around the world for U.S. produced firearms, and handguns in particular, seem to be drying up as a look at the export totals reveals. There were a total of 29,537 pistols exported in 1998, a decline from the 44,182 of 1997, the 64,126 of 1996, the 97,969 of 1995, the 95,036 of 1994 and the 59,197 pistols exported during 1993.<br><br>The top pistol exporter during 1998 was Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co. with 4,026. In 1997, Sturm, Ruger exported 5,097. Following close behind in 1998 was Lorcin Engineering with 4,000 pistols. Colt’s finished third with shipment of 3,968 pistols overseas. American Derringer Corp. shipped out 3,167 pistols to finish in fourth place and Smith &amp; Wesson Corp. finished fifth with 3,006 pistols exported.<br><br>Other larger pistol exporters during 1998 were Phoenix Arms with 732 pistols, Les Baer Custom with 711, Beretta USA with 1,198, and SIG Arms with export of 2,394 pistols.<br><br>A total of 15,788 revolvers were exported by U.S. firms during 1998, a considerable decline from the 63,656 exported in 1997, the 90,058 of 1996, the 131,634 shipped overseas in 1995, the 78,935 of 1994 and the 91,460 exported in 1993.<br><br>Sturm, Ruger was the largest revolver exporter in 1998 with 7,178 units. Sturm, Ruger exported 7,282 revolvers in 1997. They were followed in 1998 by Colt’s Manufacturing with export of 4,329 wheelguns. North American Arms, Inc. exported 4,122, H&amp;R 1871 exported 140 and the Robar Companies, Inc. of Phoenix, AZ sent out 13 revolvers.<br><br>Some 65,807 rifles were exported by U.S. producers in 1998 compared to 76,626 in 1997, 74,555 in 1996, 89,053 in 1995, 82,226 in 1994 and 94,272 in 1993.<br><br>Remington Arms Co., with a total of 21,772 rifles in 1998 exported the most. In 1997 Remington exported 18,074 rifles. The Marlin Firearms Co. followed close behind with 15,884. Sturm, Ruger &amp; Co. finished third with 14,618 trailed by U.S. Repeating Arms with 5,288 and Colt’s Manufacturing with 3,648. Other larger volume rifle exporters during 1998 included Thompson/Center with 1,128 units.<br><br>ATF includes combination rifle/shotguns in its shotgun exportation figures, though only a small number of such combination guns are produced in the U.S. For 1998, a total of 89,699 shotguns and combination guns were exported. This compares to 86,263 in 1997, 97,173 in 1996, some 100,894 in 1995, the 146,524 exported in 1994 and the 171,475 shotguns exported in 1993.<br><br>The highest volume exporter was O.F. Mossberg (including the Maverick Arms division) with 39,627 units. In 1997, Mossberg exported 44,470 shotguns. H&amp;R 1871 came in at second place in 1998 with 23,051 guns. Remington Arms Co. ranked third with exportation of 17,276. U.S. Repeating Arms was in fourth place with 7,902 firearms and Beretta USA finished fifth with 1,113 units during 1998.<br><br>The total number of machine guns exported during 1998 was 12,529, a drop from the 20,857 exported in 1997, the 33,875 of 1996, the 19,259 of 1995, and the 16,729 exported in 1994.<br><br>A grand total of just 23 “Any Other Weapons” were exported during 1998, compared to none in 1997, just 223 in 1996, only 27 in 1995 and 56 in 1994. Some 2,513 “miscellaneous” firearms were exported during 1998, versus 4,354 in 1997, some 6,055 in 1996, a total of 2,495 in 1995 and 3,222 in 1994.<br><br>Note: For purposes of this report, “production” is defined as firearms, including separate frames or receivers, actions or barreled actions, manufactured, disposed of in commerce during the calendar year.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): October 2000</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-october-2000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman Issue No 38 &#8211; July 2000An Electronic Publication from:NICK STEADMAN FEATURESTel : 01273-773362,International +44-1273-773362Fax: 01273-822078,International +44-1273-822078SADW2@compuserve.comSADW@cwcom.net SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br>Issue No 38 &#8211; July 2000<br>An Electronic Publication from:<br>NICK STEADMAN FEATURES<br>Tel : 01273-773362,<br>International +44-1273-773362<br>Fax: 01273-822078,<br>International +44-1273-822078<br>SADW2@compuserve.com<br>SADW@cwcom.net<br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br>SA80 &#8211; UK MOD DECIDES TO UPGRADE: in an unimaginative but predictable development, the UK MOD has finally opted to embark on an upgrade programme for 200,000 of its 300,000-odd stock of 5.56mm SA80 weapons, at a total cost (including trials) of around £80 millions, or about £400 each. This is almost exactly the same as the 1989 MOD purchase price for SA80 of approx US$600 apiece (with iron sights).<br><br>Note also that the replacement price for an M16A2 quoted by the USMC in May 96 was $586 (now about £390), and that the DoD bulk contract prices from 1986 to 1990 for the same weapon typically ranged from about $479 falling to around $420 each, with one buy as low as $389. The SA80 contract, subject to finalisation, is to go to H&amp;K (UK), otherwise known as Royal Ordnance Nottingham.<br><br>However, the MOD still has a requirement on the table for 15,000 Personal Defence Weapons (PDW), though it now looks as if it has abandoned any idea of an off-the-shelf buy of another 5.56mm rifle for some of its rapid reaction forces. But separately the ministry has just ordered a limited number of new M16 clones from Diemaco in Canada to re-equip UK special forces; these weapons are likely to resemble M4A1s.<br><br>If you read on, it also appears the MOD has decided not to scrap the SA 80 Light Support Weapon variant after all. The Defence Secretary has also stated that it’s now planned to retain SA80 in service until 2020, which &#8211; at 35 years from its 1985 in-service date, would eventually make it one of the more geriatric 5.56mm small arms system around. We omit the M16 from this comparison, since that system has already gone through several major makeovers since the 1960s. Mind you, even the much more ‘modern’ Steyr AUG is, amazingly, now in its 23rd year. Interestingly, comments in the MOD Procurement Agency’s Preview magazine suggested the foreign ammunition interoperability problem had arisen from the fact that SA80 was developed to use ammunition loaded with extruded propellant, whereas other NATO countries used ball powder.<br><br>In fact, SA80 was developed using ball powder propellant since, at that time, British 5.56mm ammunition had not yet come on stream at Royal Ordnance Radway Green. Instead, FN ammunition was used. The problem came when the developers switched to new British ammunition with tubular propellant, since this gives a lower gas port pressure and reduces the cyclic rate. In fact, we understand that pre-production SA80s could only be made to achieve the specified rate of fire by bracing the buttstock against a wall.<br><br>Though &#8211; with further work &#8211; performance of the SA80 was finally brought up to UK requirements with domestic ammunition, it is not particularly surprising that switching back to ball powder ammunition for NATO interoperability testing caused new problems, presumably due to overfunctioning, which is a fast route to feed stoppages. As part of its programme to test the latest SA80 modifications, the MOD says two million rounds were fired in cold/hot weather trials in Alaska and Kuwait, using ball ammunition from the UK and two other (un-named) NATO countries, plus blank.<br><br>The undue ammunition sensitivity does however suggest that SA80 is an excessively pernickety and poorly-balanced design. This kind of thing doesn’t often happen with FALs, G3s or even M16s, which usually chew up pretty much any ammunition without a glitch. As to the SA80 upgrade itself, the MOD indicates that the work, or at least the majority of it, will be carried out by Heckler &amp; Koch in Germany, where the modifications were designed, while the H&amp;K (UK) small arms line at Nottingham still stands idle (and is now threatened with closure), though which H&amp;K location actually does the job will ultimately be a matter for the company.<br><br>The MOD implies it’s doing its best to maximise the number of UK jobs the task will involve, however these seem unlikely to be within Royal Ordnance, but rather at the army’s Donnington base repair organisation, where weapons will be prepared for upgrading. That said, we imagine Nottingham is by now a little out of practice (and staff), so sending the job to Germany is logical, even if Oberndorf is probably fairly well stretched just now by other work for the Bundeswehr, such as the G36 contract.<br><br>An MOD Parliamentary Answer on 7 Jun 00 explained the decision to use Oberndorf as follows:<br><br>‘Royal Ordnance submitted a bid to the Ministry of Defence on the basis that the bulk of the modification programme should be carried out at Heckler and Koch’s Oberndorf facility where the original modifications were designed and implemented. The company has indicated that to carry out the modification work elsewhere would require it to invest in the acquisition of new specialist tooling equipment and the transfer of technical expertise from Oberndorf, and maintains that conducting the modification work there represents the lowest risk to the timescale and cost of the programme. Equally, early indications are that work on stripping and refurbishment of weapons, prior to modification could most sensibly be done in the UK.’<br><br>Official aim is to have the first 22,000 SA80 weapons upgraded by the end of 2001, with initial deliveries as early as next January. The ministry describes the project in these terms:-<br><br>1. The decision (to upgrade) follows Heckler &amp; Koch (UK) Ltd.’s report into the causes of the reliability problems and potential modifications. Comprehensive climatic trials were conducted in 1999 with the final design authority report received in December 1999.<br><br>2. The proposed modification package represents a system approach to improving the reliability while maintaining the weapon system’s overall effectiveness. The work comprises both modification of the existing weapons and a number of replacement components.’<br><br>Items to be modified (in MOD’s own terminology) are:-<br><br>• Barrel Extension (one and a half lugs removed to allow for revised extractor shape)<br>• Bolt Head Carrier (polish contact surface to reduce friction)<br>• Hammer Stop (strengthened)<br>• Receiver (ejection port enlarged to allow clean ejection).<br>The following new components will also be incorporated:-<br><br>• Magazine (re-designed for improved feed)<br>• Firing Pin (improved tolerances and extended life)<br>• Hammer (increased mass to overcome bolt bounce)<br>• Gas Plug (radiused at collar to prevent shearing)<br>• Gas Cylinder (greater tolerances)<br>• New springs (to optimise performance &#8211; including recoil springs, ejector springs, extractor spring) (nb: the MOD also confirms a new, stronger magazine spring will be adopted which would be logical to help reduce stoppages if the gun tends to overfunction with ball powder)<br>• Bolt Assembly/Extractor (improve extraction pattern)<br>• Cocking Lever (revised shape to deflect cases)<br>• A new barrel for the LSW (but not for the rifle) (increased life).<br><br>Considering the number of brand-new 5.56mm weapons which could be bought with the additional £80m now to be spent on upgrading SA80, we consider this programme will be a shocking waste of taxpayers’ money.<br><br>With the benefit of hindsight, but without any doubt, SA80 has turned out to be the worst small arms system the UK has ever adopted. That’s not to say that other British army weapons, mostly minor adaptations of well-established foreign designs, have not had their own problems, but nothing on this scale. It’s significant however that, with the exception of the rather crude Sten gun and the ill-fated EM-1 &amp; EM-2 bullpups, Enfield had little recent experience of designing small arms from scratch, which is &#8211; as far as we can see &#8211; at the root of the problem. Since 1985 the SA80 system has simply staggered from one crisis to another, with no decisive outcome, and it is regrettable, to say the least, that the MOD still doesn’t have the courage to ditch the thing altogether and cut its (or rather our) losses. We imagine that the National Audit Office may well have fun with this one sometime down the line.<br><br>BODYGUARDS NEED TO MERGE A LITTLE: a photo, run by the Guardian a while back, showed an impish-looking British Defence Staff chief General Sir Charles Guthrie, apparently soon after his arrival in Freetown (Sierra Leone), chatting as he went with local British commander Brigadier David Richards, and accompanied by a Captain who was presumably the General’s aide. All were in camo fatigues, as one might expect, with at least a couple of pistols between them, plus two heavy-duty pilot’s bags, the kind of thing that usually contains the ‘duty-frees’.<br><br>However, behind the Captain, and sticking out like a sore thumb, was one of those athletic and overly intense-looking close protection types, usually from the Military Police, that we’re familiar with seeing whenever British ambassadors unwisely stray outdoors in other equally God-forsaken hotspots around the world. Wearing a light-coloured fisherman’s vest and similar-hued trousers, and armed with a 5.56mm HK53 ‘SMG’ on an assault sling, all the CP guy lacked was a flashing neon sign on his head saying “Yes, I’m the bodyguard &#8211; shoot me!”.<br><br>You would have thought it might be a good idea at least to have him wear the same uniform as his charges, and merge a little. We wonder what the life expectancy is in that job. That apart, we note that the handy little HK53 still remains the close protection tool of choice, and not only in the Military Police. It’s a noisy, flashy little blighter, but at least has a sporting chance of defeating body armour, which the MP5 will not. It also looks ‘bad’, which we guess is half the battle.<br><br>ISRAELI ‘MOUSE BALL’ AMMO STILL CAUSING INJURIES: we’ve mentioned several times in the past the deaths caused by the allegedly ‘non-lethal’ rubber-coated steel balls used as anti-riot ammunition by Israeli forces, launched from muzzle dischargers on their rifles. In May 2000 riots in the West Bank, Reuters said that ‘at least 11’ more Palestinians were wounded by these projectiles. This is the same kind of system, remember, manufactured by IMI, that the US army wants to introduce as one of its own new non-lethal weapons. Frankly, the rubber coating (which is very thin) is almost irrelevant; they might just as well simply fire plain steel balls. Either way, this is just not a safe system for riot control.<br><br>CANUCKS GETTING NEW M203s: JDW noted that the Canadian DND has ordered Qty 2,145 40mm M203A1 grenade launchers from Diemaco in Ontario for use on Canadian forces C7A1 ‘flat-top’ M16A2 clones, also made by Diemaco. The M203 deal is valued at $C2.9m, and is a reduction (after review) from an original bid for 2,524 launchers. Defense News said deliveries will start in Sep 2000, extending till Aug 2001, and that the deal included spares, tooling, support kit and initial training. Also that Diemaco was making deliveries to another NATO customer of another 450 M203s, but the company wasn’t cracking on precisely who the customer was. As we recall, the Canadian M203 bid has now been in the works for some considerable time; we seem to remember Diemaco first mentioning it several years ago when we visited their plant in Kitchener (a press ‘first’, by the way).<br><br>MILKOR 40MM UNDERBARREL LAUNCHER: Asian Military Review noted that Milkor in South Africa has introduced a new underbarrel 40mm grenade launcher to accompany its well-established 6-shot MGL. Called the MK40, the single-shot launcher is intended for mounting on a wide variety of rifles using what’s described as a ‘euro rail’ interface, and (unlike the pump-action M203), the barrel swings to the left or right for loading, which is claimed to be an easier system to operate in the prone position.<br><br>There is an ergonomic finger-grooved grip (presumably made of rubber) around the barrel, which appears to be quite short. Effective range is claimed to be 300m, rather less than the 400m normally stated for the 40mm low-velocity grenade cartridge &#8211; which is of course also made in South Africa.<br><br>It’s not known whether the MK40’s chamber is (like that of the M203 PI) also compatible with the longer pyrotechnic, riot control and other special-purpose 40mm cartridges. Though the single-shot systems have their downside, most obviously the slow rate of fire, the fact that new 40mm launchers keep appearing suggests this is a class of weapon which remains very popular. Cynics might well ask why the UK MOD decided to adopt the heavier, bulkier and less flexible rifle grenades for use with SA80, rather than 40mm cartridges, though admittedly rifle grenades don’t require a launcher to be kept on the weapon.<br><br>RUGER BRINGS BACK THE .44 CARBINE: after several years of teasing us, Ruger has finally reintroduced a .44 Magnum semi-auto carbine to match the model first offered in 1961, though the new version is a rather different design. The Ruger Deerfield, as it’s called, has a modified Mini-14 gas system, bolt and Mini-14-style woodwork, with (instead of the original’s tubular magazine) a four-round rotary magazine. Receivers are equipped with integral bases for Ruger’s high-mount scope rings (supplied).<br><br>An adjustable folding aperture rearsight with gold front bead are also provided, zeroed to 50 yards using 240gr loadings. Barrel length is 181/2” and length overall 36.9”. Weight empty is 6.2 pounds. The carbine comes with a crossbolt safety and hold-open catch on the cocking handle. Standard finish is blued steel. Price was not stated.<br><br>Ruger cautions against using .44 Special and all aluminium-cased .44 ammunition, which it says may not cycle the weapon, or .44 Magnum rounds exceeding 1.61” in length, which may not fit in the magazine. It also says non-jacketed bullets should be avoided, since lead fouling might result in the gas port being occluded.<br><br>ISRAELI 5.56MM AMMO FOR FRANCE?: TTU Europe reported in Jun 2000 that the French MOD was considering buying 5.56mm ammunition from IMI in Israel as part of ongoing Franco-Israeli industrial and procurement co-operation. It might be more cost-effective than buying French, but going offshore raised the obvious question of security of supply. It seems the French MOD now risks being as cavalier with its domestic defence suppliers as the UK MOD was prior to the recent ten-year ammunition procurement partnering deal with Royal Ordnance. Unusually, French-issue 5.56mm ball ammunition for the FAMAS bullpup is steel-cased, by the way, not something we were aware that IMI &#8211; which has high-volume SCAMP production plant as used by US military arsenals &#8211; has ever made.<br><br>UK SMALL ARMS DISPOSALS: in answer to a Jun 2000 Parliamentary Question on the UK MOD’s policy regarding sale of army surplus self-loading rifles, the Defence Secretary replied:<br><br>‘Our policy is that small arms (other than automatic weapons which are routinely destroyed) which are declared surplus by the Ministry of Defence are available only to Governments, including acceptable military, paramilitary and police organisations (either directly or through duly licensed entities authorised to procure weapons on their behalf), to meet their legitimate defence and security requirements. All such transfers are assessed on a case by case basis against the UK national export licence assessment criteria and the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports.<br><br>In practice, few inquiries are received for the purchase of surplus small arms and the reality is that most are destroyed.’<br><br>What this doesn’t tell us is what quantities of these weapons (7.62mm L1A1 FALs) are still held by the UK MOD after re-equipment with the 5.56mm SA80, starting in 1985. From the ease with which sizeable tranches of L1A1 rifles have recently been found to send to Sierra Leone, we guess the answer is ‘quite a lot’. Presumably they’re being kept as mobilisation reserves, as Canada has done with its 7.62mm family of weapons.<br><br>GALE McMILLAN PASSES AWAY AT 69: we’re sorry to report that Gale McMillan, father of brothers Rock &amp; Kelly McMillan, died on 29 May 2000, Memorial Day, at the relatively early age of 69, after a struggle with cancer of the bladder. We only met him once or twice, but have visited his companies a number of times.<br><br>The Fifty Calibre Shooters’ Association (FCSA) said that Gale, a native of Gilbert (Arizona), served 20 years in the USAF from 1948 and afterwards went on to pioneer the use of fibreglass stockwork and develop a number of innovative sniper &amp; target weapons which sold to US special forces and federal agencies as well as competition shooters. McMillan and H-S Precision (in that order) still appear to be the only two real choices for high-tech stocks amongst serious rifle users today.<br><br>The Arizona Republic said that Gale’s original company, G McMillan &amp; Co, was sold in 1987, but he then founded the McMillan Optical Gunsight Co which developed day and night scopes for rifles. The McMillan Rifle Barrels business was separately sold to Bill Wiseman.<br><br>Gale was also a keen and successful competitive varmint &amp; benchrest shooter. His pioneering work is now continued by his sons Rock and Kelly McMillan via the two family companies McBros (the riflemakers) and McMillan Fiberglass Stocks, both in Phoenix. If you ever get to see the movie Kit Carson, look out for a young Gale McMillan; the Arizona Republic said that when it was filmed, in the Kayenta area, Gale secured a bit part at five bucks a day as one of the kids on the wagon train. Immortality comes in many guises.<br><br>RUGER DIVESTS ITSELF OF UNI-CAST: Firearms Business reported in mid-Jun 2000 that Ruger was to sell its Uni-Cast investment casting division in New Hampshire to an unspecified buyer, but would retain ownership of the land &amp; buildings, plus the rights to &#8211; and equipment for manufacturing metal matrix composites. The company would henceforth purchase its aluminium pistol frames from Uni-Cast’s new owners. We assume the purpose of the deal is to reduce overheads and liberate some spare cash.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Review: October 2000</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/new-review-october-2000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Choat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kobun™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M9-SD SUPPRESSOR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malvern Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optima 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZEISS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Chris Choat ADVANCED ARMAMENT M9-SD SUPPRESSOR FOR BERETTA 92F Advanced Armament Corp. has a new suppressor specifically designed for the Beretta Model 92F 9mm semi-automatic pistol. Designated the M9-SD the new suppressor represents the state of the art in quick-detach sound suppressor technology. Constructed of anodized aircraft quality aluminum and 17-4 PH stainless steel, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Chris Choat</strong><br><br><strong>ADVANCED ARMAMENT M9-SD SUPPRESSOR FOR BERETTA 92F</strong><br><br>Advanced Armament Corp. has a new suppressor specifically designed for the Beretta Model 92F 9mm semi-automatic pistol. Designated the M9-SD the new suppressor represents the state of the art in quick-detach sound suppressor technology. Constructed of anodized aircraft quality aluminum and 17-4 PH stainless steel, the M9-SD delivers unparalleled performance in a physically small package. The 1.25” OD x 7.4” suppressor features integral front and rear sights (a front night sight is available as an option), and can be attached or removed in less than 2 seconds. This wipeless baffle stack minimizes first round pop, and delivers 30+ dB dry, and 40+ dB wet sound reduction. Factory Beretta barrels modified to accept the M9-SD are also available from Advanced Armament Corp. For more information on this and other fine suppressors contact; Advanced Armament Corp., Dept. SAR, 221 West Crogan Street, Lawrenceville, GA 30045. Phone: 1-770-277-4946. Fax: 1-770-963-6556. They can be found on the web at <a href="http://www.advanced-armament.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.advanced-armament.com</a>.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="700" height="623" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-41.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10480" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-41.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-41-300x267.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-41-600x534.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>ADVANCED ARMAMENT M9-SD SUPPRESSOR FOR BERETTA 92F</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>ZEISS INTRODUCES STAINLESS STEEL RIFLESCOPES</strong><br><br>As the popularity of stainless steel rifles continues to increase, more and more hunters are looking for superior optics that complement their centerfire or rimfire rifle of choice. Because of this Carl Zeiss Optical, Inc. announces the availability of the popular Z-series1.5-6&#215;42, 2.5-10&#215;48 and 3-12&#215;56 riflescopes in a stainless finish and the C-series 3-9&#215;36 in both the stainless and silver finishes. The newest additions to the premium line of Zeiss riflescopes combine rugged, all-weather durability with a touch of elegance. The stainless steel finish provides the perfect balance of color with the rifle, while the protective finish is considerably harder and more resistant to abrasion and mechanical damages than laquer finishes. Engineered for strength and reliability, all optical elements in Zeiss’ stainless and silver finished riflescopes are fully coated with the exclusive T* multi-coating. The result is a sharp, clear, well contrasted, well-detailed image in low light conditions such as dawn or dusk when game is most active. A nitrogen filling ensures these riflescopes do not fog up due to extreme fluctuations in temperature. As with all Zeiss products, these stainless steel riflescopes are guaranteed to be waterproof and shockproof. This is backed by the best warranty in the industry, Zeiss’ Limited Lifetime Transferable Warranty. For more information contact Carl Zeiss Optical, Inc., Dept. SAR, 13017 N. Kingston Ave., Chester, VA 23836. Phone: 1-800-338-2984. Fax: 1-804-930-8315. On the web at <a href="https://www.zeiss.com/corporate/int/home.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.zeiss.com</a>.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="327" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-47.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10481" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-47.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-47-300x140.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-47-600x280.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>ZEISS INTRODUCES STAINLESS STEEL RIFLESCOPES</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>COLD STEEL® KOBUN™ CARBON V®</strong><br><br>Cold Steel, one of the world’s leading manufacturers of quality knives, has announced a new version of the popular Kobun™ fixed blade boot knife. The new version of the Cold Steel Kobun integrates a black epoxy powder coated Carbon V® steel blade for added corrosion and scratch resistance. This innovative steel provides durability and ruggedness, yet holds an edge for an extended period and is easy to resharpen when necessary. The blade is 5 1/2” long and 1/8” thick. Cold Steel’s new Kobun-Carbon V features a durable, checkered Kraton(r) handle that provides unsurpassed comfort and balance, as well as a positive grip, wet or dry. Overall, the Kobun is 9 7/8” long and weighs 4.5 ounces. Each is supplied with Cold Steel’s exclusive Quick Draw Concealex(tm) sheath that incorporates an integral belt/boot clip. Like all Cold Steel fixed-blade knives the Kobun Carbon V is protected by Cold Steel’s exclusive five year warranty. Manufacturers suggested retail price for the new Cold Steel Kobun Carbon V is $99.00. Cold Steel manufacturers a full line of knives and tools optimized for hunting, outdoor recreation and self defense. Cold Steel is the inventor of Carbon V(r) Steel, Kraton(r) molded synthetic handles and the San Mai III(r) laminated blade. For more information on the Cold Steel Kobun(tm) Fixed Blade Boot Knife, contact; Cold Steel, Dept. SAR, 2128-D Knoll Drive, Ventura, CA 93003. Phone: 1-800-255-4716. They can be located on the web at <a href="https://www.coldsteel.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.coldsteel.com</a>.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="440" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-46.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10482" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-46.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-46-300x189.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-46-600x377.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>COLD STEEL® KOBUN™ CARBON V®</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>TASCO’S PROPOINT OPTIMA 2000</strong><br><br>It’s new. It’s revolutionary. It’s the smallest red dot sighting device making the biggest impact on the industry. Professional shooters are calling Optima 2000 the most revolutionary development in optical sighting devices in the last 25 years. The newest and perhaps most innovative Tasco Propoint red dot sight is aptly named the Optima 2000. It provides optimum performance and is engineered with the kind of advanced turn-of-the-century technology that has never been seen in this millennium. The Optima 2000 is smaller (only 1 1/2” long) and lighter in weight (only 1/2 ounce) than any other sighting device. It is extremely durable and rugged. Thousands of test rounds had no effect on it. It held its point of aim and its one-piece, dovetailed-style, slide mount remained immovable. The red dot is always on. There’s no time lost in activating it and it can be seen in all ambient light conditions. While primarily use on pistols, the Optima 2000 can be mounted on shotguns for skeet and trap shooting or for duck hunting. It also works well on rifles for sport or hunting. And its value for law enforcement is undeniable. Optima 2000 is available with a bright, in-focus 3.5 or 7 M.O.A. dot on the same plane as iron sights allowing for fast target acquisition. Battery operated, the unit is supplied with a cover which puts the dot in a “sleep” mode extending the battery like for years of use. The latest in a long line of highly regarded and rated ProPoint sighting devices, Optima 2000 is covered by the Tasco 2-year No Fault, No Hassle/Limited Lifetime Warranty. For more information on this any other great Tasco products contact Tasco, Dept SAR, 2889 Commerce Parkway, Miramar, FL 33026. Phone: 1-888-GET-TASCO. Fax: 954-252-3705. Website: <a href="http://www.tasco.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.tascosales.com</a>.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="448" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-43.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10483" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-43.jpg 448w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-43-192x300.jpg 192w" sizes="(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px" /><figcaption><em>TASCO’S PROPOINT OPTIMA 2000</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>RIMFIRE BULLET TRAP</strong><br><br>Malvern Products has just introduced their new bullet trap designed specifically for all rimfire cartridges including .22 Magnum. The new trap features 1/8” construction with 1/4” thick material at all critical areas. The revolutionary conical design of the new trap causes impacting bullets to hit a sloped surface no matter how they enter the trap. Unlike “flat &amp; deflect” traps, the conical shape causes the bullets to spiral in with a minimum impact to the center where it is deflected down by a 90 degree elbow. The trap has a built-in balanced carry handle as well as a stand to set it upright. The front inlet to the trap is a large 18 inches. Retail price of the trap is $299.00. For more information contact Malvern Products, Dept. SAR, 176 Pennsylvania Ave, Malvern PA 19355. Phone: 1-610-647-1717. You can also contact them via their website at www.malvernproducts.com.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="554" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-38.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10484" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-38.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-38-300x237.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-38-600x475.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>RIMFIRE BULLET TRAP</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>WOLF PERFORMANCE AMMUNITION</strong><br><br>Wolf Performance Ammunition has just introduced another caliber in their line of high quality ammunition. Wolf Performance .45 Auto ammunition is their new caliber and features a 230 grain copper jacketed FMJ projectile with a steel case. The steel case allows Wolf to produce the most economical and highest quality .45 Auto cartridge available today. Wolf is the only Russian ammunition available with Cooper Jacketed Projectiles in all calibers which results in less barrel wear As with all Wolf products, the .45 Auto comes with a Performance Guarantee. Wolf Performance Ammunition is produced in the city of Tula, Russia’s oldest industrial city. This city is the home of Tula Cartridge Works (TCW) which manufactures Wolf Ammunition. Sporting Supplies International (SSI) of Anaheim, California is the exclusive importer of Wolf Performance Ammunition. Currently Wolf ammo is available for rifles in 7.62&#215;39, .223-55 grain, .223-62 grain and 5.45&#215;39. All of these calibers are loaded with boat tail bullets for match grade accuracy. It is also available in the following pistol calibers; 9mm Luger, 9&#215;18 Makarov, .380 Auto, .40 S&amp;W and the new .45 Auto. The case mouth and the primer pocket feature a mil-spec sealant ensuring consistent and reliable operation no matter what the weather conditions. In addition, a green lacquered case ensures the best function cartridge in adverse environmental conditions, and it also extends storage life. All Wolf ammunition is newly manufactured and non-corrosive. For more information on this fine ammunition contact Wolf Performance Ammunition, Dept. SAR, 2201 E. Winston Road, Suite K, Anaheim, CA 92806. Phone: 1-714-635-4246. Fax: 1-714-635-9276. Their website is <a href="http://wolfammo.com/default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.wolfammo.com</a>.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="484" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-27.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10485" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-27.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-27-300x207.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-27-600x415.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>WOLF PERFORMANCE AMMUNITION</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Reviews: October 2000</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/book-reviews-october-2000/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Fortier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet SVD Dragunov sniper rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By David Fortier THE OFFICIAL SOVIET SVD MANUALOperating Instructions of the 7.62mm Dragunov Sniper RifleTranslated By Maj. James F. Gebhardt,U.S. Army (Retired)Paladin PressP.O. Box 1307Boulder, CO 803061-800-392-2400ISBN 1-58160-032-1$15.00 plus S&#38;H112 pagesReview by David Fortier Major James Gebhardt does it again in this valuable translation of the Soviet manual on the SVD sniping rifle. Designed by Evgeniy [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>David Fortier</strong><br><br><strong>THE OFFICIAL SOVIET SVD MANUAL</strong><br>Operating Instructions of the 7.62mm Dragunov Sniper Rifle<br>Translated By <strong>Maj. James F. Gebhardt,<br>U.S. Army (Retired)</strong><br>Paladin Press<br>P.O. Box 1307<br>Boulder, CO 80306<br>1-800-392-2400<br>ISBN 1-58160-032-1<br>$15.00 plus S&amp;H<br>112 pages<br>Review by David Fortier</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="555" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-42.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10491" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-42.jpg 555w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-42-238x300.jpg 238w" sizes="(max-width: 555px) 100vw, 555px" /><figcaption><em>The Official Soviet SVD Manual</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Major James Gebhardt does it again in this valuable translation of the Soviet manual on the SVD sniping rifle. Designed by Evgeniy Fedorovich Dragunov and adopted by the Soviet Army as their standard sniping rifle in 1963, the SVD has been shrouded in mystery. The first rifle ever designed from the ground up specifically for the task of sniping, it is still standard issue in the Russian Army. Russia has a long tradition of employing snipers that dates all the way back to the Crimean War of 1854. Even the Germans played catch up to the Soviets throughout the Second World War when it came to sniping. Using this vast wealth of practical wartime experience, they designed the SVD Dragunov sniping rifle and PSO-1 scope.<br><br>While instantly recognizable, there has not been a lot of information on the Dragunov or its scope available, and some of what has been written is incorrect. With numbers of these rifles in the U.S. (and the Romanian FPK/PSL sniper rifle based upon the RPK but still utilizing the 7.62x54R cartridge), this manual will be of great interest and a great help. Not only does it teach stripping, maintenance, troubleshooting, and firing positions with the Dragunov, but also much more. All the little accessories for the rifle AND the scope are covered. Ammunition is covered, as well as using the PSO-1 scope, and there is a vast array of excellent ballistic charts for the 7.62x54R cartridge. From zeroing the weapon to leading parachutists, there is a lot of interesting and valuable information here.<br><br>This book also dispels some false information. It has been stated that the Russians never taught the use of the sling as a shooting support- incorrect. The same goes for the Russians never issuing special sniping ammunition. The manual not only talks about it, but also tells you how to identify it (I have fired some of this ammunition out of my SVD and it grouped into 2 3/4 inches at 300 yards). Anyone who has an SVD or Romanian FPK should have this manual- it will answer all your nagging questions.<br><br><strong>HANDGUN STOPPING POWER</strong><br>The Definitive Study<br>By <strong>Evan P. Marshall<br>Edwin J. Sanow</strong><br>Published by Paladin Press<br>P.O. Box 1307<br>Boulder, Colorado<br>80306<br>1-800-392-2400<br>$45.00 plus S&amp;H<br><strong>Reviewed by David Fortier</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="416" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-48.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10492" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-48.jpg 416w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-48-178x300.jpg 178w" sizes="(max-width: 416px) 100vw, 416px" /></figure></div>



<p>What actually happens when someone is shot with a handgun? Do hollowpoints work? Is it true that ‘they all fall to .45 ball’? What’s the best handgun load for self defense? What IS stopping power, how does it work, and how much is enough?<br><br>Only 12 or 15 years short years ago the above questions did nothing more than stimulate endless debate. There were lots of opinions, but little for hard facts. Evan Marshall and Edwin Sanow changed all that in this landmark book. For the first time the results of thousands of actual shootings were recorded and compiled by caliber and load. Years in the making, the author’s goal was to provide accurate unbiased wound ballistics and ammo information that street cops and civilians alike could use. The information gathered was compiled from police reports, autopsies, and victim statements. Through this information we can see how well individual loads actually worked in real life shootings. Or, how poorly they did.<br><br>For anyone who carries a handgun, this is a must read book. In 224 pages the authors explain the medical mechanisms of collapse, previous theories of stopping power, and why they don’t work, actual street shootings, tissue simulants, new ammo developments, predicting stopping power using street results, and more. This book contains a lot of information, and once you start reading you won’t want to stop. The chapter on actual street shootings that goes over actual incidents by caliber and load is impossible to put down. I loaned this book out and had a hard time getting it back.<br><br>For too long we guessed at what the best caliber and load for defensive use was. The arguments seemed endless and heated. Untold quantities of duct seal, phone books, paint cans, and even chickens were perforated in an attempt to ‘prove’ one theory or another. Those days are over. Now you can find out how well the load in your pistol actually works, or doesn’t. Read this book.<br><br><strong>Japanese Explosive Ordnance</strong><br>(Army Ammunition, Navy Ammunition)<br>TM 9-1985-5, Department<br>Of The Army<br>Reprinted And Published by<br>Julian Books,<br>5282 Ridan Way<br>Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33418<br>Price $25.00 plus 4.50 S&amp;H<br>Review by Stephen Stuart</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="516" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-47.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10493" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-47.jpg 516w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-47-221x300.jpg 221w" sizes="(max-width: 516px) 100vw, 516px" /><figcaption><em>Japanese Explosive Ordnance</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>While walking around the tables at Knob creek this past April, I noticed the immense amount of inert ordnance on the dealer’s tables. Everything from American practice hand grenades to Russian anti-tank rocket launcher tubes. The only thing missing were books detailing to ordnance collectors what exactly they were purchasing. Being a Japanese collector of militaria, I always wished I could find a good copy of the rare two-part U.S. training manuals describing Japanese ordnance published by the U.S. Army. As luck would have it, I found a copy of the second volume at a gun store the week I got back from Knob creek.<br><br>Volume two is now being offered by Julian books in Palm Beach Florida. The person reprinting the manual is none other than Fred Honeycutt, Jr. Mr. Honeycutt is well known in the Japanese military arms field with two small arms works under his belt, Military Rifles of Japan and Military Pistols of Japan.<br><br>The manual begins by covering the basic firearm cartridges of Japan; the 6.5mm, the 7.7mm rifle rounds, and the 9mm, 8mm Nambu handgun rounds. The text then goes on to describe rockets, mortars, and projectile fuses used by the Japanese Army and Navy. The reprint is clear with easy to understand text and line drawings. The ammunition is also shown in cross section, detailing the internal components. The only thing I can say about this book is, that it is excellent. If you like ordnance or Japanese ammunition, buy the book. And maybe, just maybe, if there is enough response, Mr. Honeycutt might decide to reprint volume one on mines, grenades, and sabotage devices.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heckler &#038; Koch&#8217;s G36C and Personal Defense Weapon</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/heckler-kochs-g36c-and-personal-defense-weapon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Q. Cutshaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G36C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Charles Q. Cutshaw Heckler &#38; Koch has gained a well-deserved reputation as an innovative small arms manufacturer that is highly responsive to the requirements of the users of its products. H&#38;K also is very sensitive to trends in the small arms market and is often ahead of its competitors in introducing state of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Charles Q. Cutshaw</strong><br><br><em>Heckler &amp; Koch has gained a well-deserved reputation as an innovative small arms manufacturer that is highly responsive to the requirements of the users of its products. H&amp;K also is very sensitive to trends in the small arms market and is often ahead of its competitors in introducing state of the art small arms for military and police use. In the present case, H&amp;K has introduced two new small arms, one completely new and another an innovative derivative of an existing product.</em><br><br><strong>H&amp;K PDW</strong><br><br>Personal defense weapons (PDWs) are a current small arms “hot button.” The United States led the way with a PDW requirement some five years ago, but never brought the requirement to a solicitation and the American PDW requirement is essentially dormant. Britain’s Ministry of Defence, however, issued a solicitation for a PDW in late January of this year, with the declared intent to purchase some 15,000 examples of the weapons between 2003 and 2005. H&amp;K’s development of their latest product line was clearly in anticipation of the current UK requirement and others to follow. PDWs are intended to arm soldiers whose duties are not near the forward combat area, soldiers whose duties require their hands to be free, and soldiers whose duties do not normally require an infantry rifle. They essentially bridge the gap between pistols and rifles, being chambered for a cartridge whose ballistics exceed those of the former, but are less than those of the latter. In that context, H&amp;K’s new PDW is the quintessence of a PDW.<br><br>Whether or not PDWs as a class of small arm will establish itself is not within the purview of this brief article, but we believe that any new weapon such as the PDW entails a degree of risk. IDR recently had the opportunity to fire H&amp;K’s PDW and examine it in detail.<br><br>From a technical standpoint, H&amp;K’s PDW is a state of the art weapon. The receiver and external components are virtually all of polymer construction, in keeping with other recent H&amp;K designs, such as the G36 rifle and UMP submachine gun. The PDW is chambered for a new cartridge, the 4.6x30mm, developed as a joint venture between H&amp;K and Royal Ordnance Radway Green. We will discuss the new cartridge in some detail below. H&amp;K’s PDW is a locked breech, select fire, gas operated small arm. The gas system utilizes a short-stroke piston to drive the bolt carrier assembly to the rear. The PDW has a cold hammer forged chrome plated barrel with six lands and grooves of a right hand twist. The bolt mechanism uses the tried and true Stoner principle with a multiple lugged bolt in a bolt carrier that uses a cam and pin mechanism to lock and unlock the breech. The reflex sighting system is made for H&amp;K by Hensoldt and is mounted on a MIL-STD-1913 rail. The optical sight has relatively long eye-relief so it can be used either close to the eye when the PDW is fired as a carbine or at arm’s length when the PDW is fired as a pistol. The optical sight works either by using ambient light or under low light conditions from a battery or tritium insert. There are backup open sights in case the optical sight becomes damaged or is removed. The PDW feeds from a detachable staggered row box magazine. Two magazine capacities are available &#8211; 20 and 40 rounds. The magazine well is in the weapon’s pistol grip. The PDW has a folding foregrip and collapsible buttstock. Cyclic rate is approximately 700 rounds per minute.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="480" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-49.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10497" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-49.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-49-300x206.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-49-600x411.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>G36C with stock folded. Note the Mil-Std-1913 rails.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>We found the H&amp;K PDW to be very pleasant to shoot, despite the fact that the pistol grip is nearly vertical, which we thought would make the weapon awkward to handle, but this was not the case. The controls are well-placed, fully ambidextrous and intuitive to use. The sliding buttstock retracts easily into its fully extended position and the foregrip aids in maintaining control in fully automatic fire. Our only possible complaint about this little weapon is the fact that its barrel is so short that the potential exists for a user to place his or her hand over the muzzle under stress. We should note, however, that H&amp;K has placed a “hook” at the forearm tip to prevent one’s hand from overriding it and inadvertently covering the muzzle with the hand. New prototypes will have threaded barrels to extend the muzzle by adding quick detachable flash suppressors, compensators, blank firing adaptors, or sound suppressors. That said, we preferred to shoot the little PDW using the folding foregrip. The PDW was easy to control both in rapid-fire semiautomatic and full automatic. Felt recoil was negligible and muzzle rise virtually nonexistent. We fired the weapon at ranges of 25 and 50 meters, the latter distance representing about the limit of the realistic effective range of such a weapon and found that we were able to place a high percentage of bullets in the center of mass of our silhouette target. The reader will note from our discussion of the 4.6x30mm cartridge below that the PDW can be used effectively to a range of at least 100 meters. Shooting H&amp;K’s PDW can best be described as pleasant and uneventful, which is a tribute to the overall excellent design of the little weapon and its diminutive 4.6x30mm cartridge.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="647" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-48.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10498" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-48.jpg 647w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-48-277x300.jpg 277w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-48-600x649.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 647px) 100vw, 647px" /><figcaption><em>Left to Right: 4.6x30mm, 5.7x28mm, .224 BOZ, 5.56x45mm</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Field stripping the little PDW for cleaning and maintenance is simple and can be accomplished without tools, unless one counts a cartridge as a “tool.” The cartridge is used to press out pins that retain the upper and lower receiver sections and the buttstock assembly, which retains the recoil mechanism and bolt carrier assembly. The cartridge is also used to disassemble the bolt carrier assembly when required. The photo of the stripped PDW shows the simplicity of the little weapon.<br><br>A key element of H&amp;K’s PDW design is the 4.6x30mm nontoxic cartridge, which has not been standardized by any NATO country as of the time of this writing. The cartridge fires a solid steel copper plated 24.7gr bullet at a muzzle velocity of 2379 fps, resulting in a muzzle energy of 312 ft-lb. For comparison, the standard British military 9x19mm cartridge has a muzzle velocity of 1299fps and a muzzle energy of 430 ft-lb. These simple numbers, however, are somewhat misleading and do not fully explain why a smaller, lighter projectile may prove superior to a larger, heavier one. The 4.6mm bullet has a high ballistic coefficient and is fired at a higher velocity than the 9mm, which gives it a flatter trajectory and greater range. The 9mm bullet, for example, will not defeat the standard NATO CRISAT target (1.6mm of titanium and 20 layers of Kevlar(r) at 50 meters. The 4.6mm bullet, on the other hand, will defeat it at over 100 meters, with sufficient velocity to transfer 85 ft-lb. of energy into and completely perforate a 150mm thick block of ordnance gelatine behind the armor barrier. This greater terminal performance also has to do with the fact that the 4.6mm bullet is copper plated solid steel while the 9mm bullet is copper with a lead core. We should note that H&amp;K states that the PDW’s 4.6mm bullet will also penetrate NATO’s CRISAT armoured personnel target at 200 meters. Although we cannot dispute the claim, the ability of so light a bullet to inflict an incapacitating wound after having passed through 1.6mm of titanium and 20 layers of Kevlar(r) at 200 meters range is questionable. H&amp;K and Radway Green are also developing tracer, frangible, JHP, training (Solid copper bullet), blank and plastic training ammunition for the PDW.<br><br>In sum, H&amp;K’s new PDW is an excellent overall design. It is handy, lightweight and can be fired either as a carbine or a pistol. Despite the fact that the 4.6x30mm cartridge offers improved penetration in comparison to standard NATO 9mm pistol ammunition, some may object to the cartridge on the basis that adopting H&amp;K’s PDW will force adoption of an additional small arms caliber into an already complex ammunition logistics system. Only time and the acceptance of PDWs as a class of weapons will tell whether H&amp;K’s latest product will be a success.<br><br><strong>G36C</strong><br><br>H&amp;K’s recently announced miniature assault rifle, the G36C (Commando) is based on the G36 assault rifle which IDR test-fired in late 1998, so we will not go into any great detail on the description and functioning of the rifle, as the principal features of the parent rifle are well-known. The basic G36 is a gas-operated select fire assault rifle for general issue to infantry soldiers. It is noted for its reliability under adverse conditions and its simplicity of operation. The G36C is intended primarily for special operations units that require an extremely compact carbine for close range engagement (CRE) ranges to 50 meters. (The G36C is truly a carbine in the classic sense because it is a short barreled version of a full-sized rifle.) Whatever it is termed, the G36C carries all of the best features of the G36 into an extremely compact package. Simply stated, we liked the original G36 and we like the G36C. It is comparable in size to a 9x19mm MP5A3 submachine gun (See accompanying photo.), yet fires a 5.56x45mm cartridge which totally outclasses any pistol caliber round (9x19mm, 10mm or .40 S&amp;W) fired by the MP5. It is compact carbines like the G36C that are spelling the demise of the submachine gun in many military special operations units. Pistol-caliber submachine guns simply do not have the effective range, terminal ballistics, or versatility of compact carbines and so are beginning to be phased out of many major military special operations forces. The G36C is one of the best compact carbines we have encountered. It is lightweight, versatile, and easy to operate and like most H&amp;K firearms that we have encountered, pleasant to shoot. If its parent G36 is any indication, the G36C will also prove to be extremely reliable.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="523" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-44.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10499" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-44.jpg 523w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-44-224x300.jpg 224w" sizes="(max-width: 523px) 100vw, 523px" /><figcaption><em><strong>Top</strong>: PDW <strong>Center</strong>: G36C <strong>Bottom</strong>: MP5K</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The G36C incorporates MIL-STD-1913 rails on the upper carrying handle and lower forearm to mount optics and other accessories. The example we test fired was equipped with a Knight’s Armament foregrip that clamps to the adapter rail. This foregrip makes the weapon easier to control on full-automatic fire. The G36C is also equipped with an advanced design Vortex-type flash suppressor that virtually eliminates muzzle flash, which is always a problem with short-barreled carbines due to incomplete combustion of powder in the shortened barrel. Although the G36 has a short sight radius, we did not find that to be a problem in our shooting. Whether we fired semi- or full automatic, the little G36C was easy to control and keep on target. There was slight muzzle rise, but it was easily controllable.<br><br>Although it is commonly accepted that velocity loss in compact carbines such as the G36C reduces the muzzle velocity to approximately 1800 fps, we wish to emphasize that this is most definitely not the case either with the G36C or with any other compact carbine. Standard SS109 (M855) ammunition has a muzzle velocity of 3051 fps when fired from a 20 inch barrel. The same cartridge fired from the 8.9 inch barrel of the G36C has a muzzle velocity of 2369 fps &#8211; a loss of some 656 fps velocity. At close range engagement (CRE) ranges at which carbines such as these are intended to be used, there is more than sufficient velocity and energy to maintain desired levels of lethality.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="691" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-39.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10500" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-39.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-39-300x296.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-39-600x592.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-39-100x100.jpg 100w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">A</span>: Remove 2 rear pins. Retaining pins are not captive. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">B</span>: Pull stock slightly to rear and remove front retaining pin. This allows removal of handguard. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">C</span>: Remove stock and operating assembly. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">D</span>: Once stock and operating assembly are removed, bolt carrier / op-rod is removed towards the front. PDW is now field stripped for routine maintenance. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">E</span>: Bolt is removed from carrier by pressing out firing pin retaining pin, then withdrawing firing pin and removal of cam pin. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">F</span>: Bolt carrier / op-rod components. Bolt is similar to AR-15/M16.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In the final analysis, we found the G36C is a very satisfactory weapon, based on our brief experience with it. The reliability and ruggedness of the parent G36 rifle is well established. If this new addition to the G36 family approaches its parent rifle in these areas, it will appeal to any organization seeking a compact carbine for close range engagements. The G36C will enter full production and will be available in September 2000.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Leupold Long-Range Tactical Scope</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-leupold-long-range-tactical-scope/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leupold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Baugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Steve Baugman Leupold &#38; Stevens has justifiably dominated the precision optics field for some time. Almost all law enforcement and military scopes bear the name Leupold. I recently evaluated one of their pinnacle products, the 4.5-14X50 Long-Range Tactical (LRT). Primarily designed for law enforcement use, it is also an excellent tool for those who [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Steve Baugman</strong><br><br>Leupold &amp; Stevens has justifiably dominated the precision optics field for some time. Almost all law enforcement and military scopes bear the name Leupold. I recently evaluated one of their pinnacle products, the 4.5-14X50 Long-Range Tactical (LRT). Primarily designed for law enforcement use, it is also an excellent tool for those who are into precision shooting.<br><br>It’s hard to put into words what one experiences while evaluating a superior rifle scope. I figured the best way to test one was to go through some training with friends on the Sheriff’s Office Tactical Team. I’ve managed to learn a bit about precision shooting through osmosis since one of my friends is a sniper on the team. I also rely on his instincts related to evaluation of tactical gear. After carefully mounting the Leupold 4.5-14&#215;50 LRT scope on a Remington PSS in .308, I was off to the range for a few days to get a feel as to how the scope performed under typical law enforcement (LE) training scenarios. Our shooting distances ranged from 35 to 200 yards, so the variable power scope was ideal for this range spectrum. For close up work, such as an urban scenario, the 4.5 power is ideal due to its large field of view. When shooting out past 75 yards, the 14.5 power setting is great for precise shot placement.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="421" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-43.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10504" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-43.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-43-300x180.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-43-309x186.jpg 309w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-43-600x361.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p>The LRT was delivered with a 16-page owner’s manual. One of the first manuals I’ve seen delivered with a scope- it was most informative. It covered items such as mounting, sighting in, zeroing the dials, maintenance, and trouble-shooting tips. Most people never read an owner’s manual for anything, much less one for a rifle scope, but this one is worth the read. One item of discussion includes understanding parallax. Parallax is the apparent movement of the target relative to the reticle when you move your eye away (sideways) from the center point of the eyepiece’s exit pupil. At short distances, the parallax effect has virtually no impact on shooting accuracy. Using a 4-power scope at 100 yards, the maximum parallax error would is less than 0.2 inches. For target shooting, varmint hunting and tactical long-range scenarios however, the scope must remain free of parallax. By adjusting for parallax, you actually move the objective lens closer to, or further from, the reticle. This allows the target to be focused precisely on the same plane as the reticle, which equates to optimal accuracy potential for any given distance. Most scopes utilize a rotating objective lens for adjusting the parallax, while the LRT features a simple side-adjustment knob. The knob does not have any distance marks like conventional rotating objectives, but it does have graduated marks for calibrations at different distances.<br><br>The scope optics are computer designed to optimize sharpness, resolution, and low-light visibility. All lenses are treated with Multicoat 4 anti-reflective coatings (Leupold proprietary) to reduce light scattering and other reflections. They should be cleaned as carefully as one would a camera lens. The body of the scope is made of 6061-T6 aircraft-grade aluminum alloy. There are no mechanical differences between the standard Vari-X III and the Tactical Vari-X III. The Tactical is matte finished, with target style adjustment knobs, and has a black matte ring in lieu of the traditional Leupold golden colored ring. The larger 50 mm lens allows more light energy to reach the eye in low-light conditions. No lubrication is ever required on any of the parts. The LRT is 100% waterproof, even without the turret caps in place. All Leupold scopes feature a full lifetime guarantee. No warranty card is required and no time limit applies. It can’t get any simpler than that.<br><br>The overall length of the scope is 12.1 inches. Optimum eye relief is 4.4 inches at 4.5 power. When set at 14 power, the eye relief drops to 3.6 inches. The scope weighs 17.5 oz. Field of view at 100 yards is 18.9 inches when set at 4.5 power. When set at 14 power, field of view shrinks to 5.9 feet. Leupold’s Mark 4 has some advantages in extreme ruggedness and increased elevation and windage adjustments, but optics quality is essentially the same in the LRT as it is in the Mark 4. The price of the LRT is about half of what a Mark 4 runs. The LRT is provided with a 30 mm tube, which provides increased strength and adjustment ranges for windage and elevation over a conventional 1 inch tube. The increase in windage and elevation is about 20% more than a standard model. This feature helps to compensate for a greater bullet drop in long-range shooting situations. The 30 mm tube does not provide any additional light gathering capability, as this is a function of lens coating and the diameter of the objective. The LRT’s are available with either the Duplex or Mil-Dot reticle pattern.<br><br>After using the scope for several weeks I came to a few conclusions. Number one, the quality and clarity of the optics are the major selling point for this scope. Better optics results in decreased eye fatigue and less distortion for long-range shooting. This factor alone really helped to keep eye-strain to a minimum. The easy manipulation of the side focus parallax knob is easier to use than standard objective lens rotation found on other scopes due to its proximity to the shooter. The elevation and windage knobs are easy to see and to use. It may seem like a small detail, but the markings on the dials are easy to read from the shooter’s position. The up (U () and right (R ®) scribe marks are engraved 5 times around the circumference of the appropriate dial. This allows adjustment without having to get close to the dials to see which way to turn them. All of the adjustments can be conveniently reached by the shooter without having to reposition one’s hold on the rifle. These details may not seem like much, but when used in the field, they save a lot of time and energy.<br><br>Throughout the training sessions, the elevation adjustment knob was used extensively due to the wide variety of ammunition I was shooting. Once zeroed, the elevation dial has a horizontal scale that informs the shooter the number of revolutions the dial has been turned when used in extreme long-range shooting. The 1/4 minute clicks are positively heard and felt, and can therefore be manipulated in very low light conditions without visually confirming. The LRT incorporates a backlash elimination system, and this allows 100% repeatability from click to click, and back again. This was validated many times during the shooting trials.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="454" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-50.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10505" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-50.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-50-300x195.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-50-600x389.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p>Confidence in the quality of anything I test is something that has to be earned in my book, and it is usually earned over a period of time. Careful evaluations require prolonged use in the field, under various tactical scenarios and environmental conditions. My summary here is that the LRT is one great piece of engineering. I believe it sets the industry standard for ruggedness, reliability, and quality in rifle scopes. Leupold’s approach to making scopes is simply stated: “Made right, made here.” They have an absolute lock on the law enforcement scope market, and I can understand why.<br><br>Source:<br><br>Leupold &amp; Stevens<br>PO Box 688<br>Beaverton, OR 97075<br>503-526-5195</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feeding the Dragon</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/feeding-the-dragon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Fortier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Heald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dragunov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet SVD Dragunov sniper rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By David Fortier &#38; Donald Heald Military small arm collectors and users tend to be a pretty opinionated bunch. You have your .45 or Die crew. Your Big Bore Battle rifle bunch. Your 30 round burst solves most anything thinkers. Your Buckshot is best believers, and your, if half your pistol isn’t plastic it’s antiquated [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>David Fortier &amp; Donald Heald</strong><br><br>Military small arm collectors and users tend to be a pretty opinionated bunch. You have your .45 or Die crew. Your Big Bore Battle rifle bunch. Your 30 round burst solves most anything thinkers. Your Buckshot is best believers, and your, if half your pistol isn’t plastic it’s antiquated junk preachers. One thing I have noticed though, is that most everybody will agree, sniping rifles are interesting. Few sniping rifles possess the animalistic sex appeal of the Soviet SVD Dragunov.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="425" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-44.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10509" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-44.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-44-300x182.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-44-600x364.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p>Known officially as the Snaiperskaya Vintovka Dragunova, the Dragunov is highly sought after by both shooters and collectors. Yet only a handful have come into the country from Red China, Russia, and now Romania. What most people don’t realize is that finding and buying a Dragunov is the easy, although expensive part. If your heart is set on rimmed cartridges, see-through stocks, and punching holes far, far away, then all you need to do is open your wallet, wide, real wide. The hard part is tracking down all the odds and ends you need to let the rifle perform to its full potential. This includes Match grade 7.62X54R ammunition (I’ve seen people feed Dragunov’s junk M.G. ball that would make a Mosin-Nagant puke, and wonder why it would only group into 2 MOA!), batteries for the illuminated scope (an easy one now that Kalashnikov USA has them in stock, call 1-800-784-5677), and ten round magazines. Magazine availability for Dragunovs has been on and off but always expensive.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="200" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-51-300x200.jpg" alt="" data-id="10511" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-51.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/002-51-5/#main" class="wp-image-10511" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-51-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-51-600x400.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-51.jpg 700w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Comparison of Russian 5 round magazine, on left, to 10 round Romanian magazine. Rounds are yellow tipped 7.62X54R Heavy Ball.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="217" height="300" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-49-217x300.jpg" alt="" data-id="10512" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-49.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/003-49-5/#main" class="wp-image-10512" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-49-217x300.jpg 217w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-49.jpg 506w" sizes="(max-width: 217px) 100vw, 217px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Close up of differences between Russian rear lug, on left, and stock Romanian magazine on right. Below: Close up of differences between Russian front lug, on left, and stock Romanian magazine on right. Also notice the difference in height of their feed ramps.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p>Recently, magazines for the Romanian FPK/PSL version of the Dragunov have come onto the market at a reasonable price, usually around $39.99. I ordered 5, danced a happy jig when the Brown truck of Happiness arrived and snapped one into my Soviet Tiger Dragunov. It locked right in and looked perfect. When I performed a function check with dummy rounds however, it refused to feed. Confused, I tried another, and another. None would work. Upon closer examination, the Romanian magazines proved to be close enough to the Soviet mags to lock into the weapon, but different enough not to work. Our happy jig turned to cursing and fist shaking. Why are they different? Who knows, but they are different.<br><br>So I sat down with one of my cohorts, Donald Heald, and we compared the Romanian magazines to Soviet built ones. We could make them work, we decided. If they were built like flimsy M-16 magazines we would have shipped them back. The Com-block countries generally made their magazines so incredibly tough though there was plenty of meat to work with. Modifying magazines is NOT something I recommend as all to often they simply won’t work. In this instance I was pleasantly surprised. The modified magazines lock in and out of the weapon properly, and they feed FLAWLESSLY!<br><br>So if you or one of your friends is wondering why those darn Romanian magazines don’t work, relax. All you need is access to a Mig welder and someone who can run it. Other than the Mig it’s just basic hand tools, and a little patience(a pizza helps too!). So follow along as we show you how to keep your Dragunov happy as we give it a taste of Romanian food it’s sure to like!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-45.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="487" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-45.jpg" alt="" data-id="10513" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-45.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/004-45-5/#main" class="wp-image-10513" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-45.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-45-300x209.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-45-600x417.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption">1. <em>CAUTION: always wear required safety equipment! Step one, take a working magazine(in our case a 5 round Russian magazine) and do a direct side by side comparison with a Romanian magazine to notice differences in the front and rear locking lugs. Field-strip the Romanian magazine. Clean and prepare surfaces for welding. Additional material is added to the rear lug by Mig-welding. Take your time and build the surface one weld at a time.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-40.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="483" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-40.jpg" alt="" data-id="10514" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-40.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/005-40-4/#main" class="wp-image-10514" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-40.jpg 483w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-40-207x300.jpg 207w" sizes="(max-width: 483px) 100vw, 483px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>2. Benchgrind the rear lug to rough proportions once enough material has been added.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-28.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="483" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-28.jpg" alt="" data-id="10515" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-28.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/006-28-4/#main" class="wp-image-10515" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-28.jpg 483w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-28-207x300.jpg 207w" sizes="(max-width: 483px) 100vw, 483px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>3. Hand file with a flat Mill Bastard file.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-25.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-25.jpg" alt="" data-id="10516" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-25.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/007-25-3/#main" class="wp-image-10516" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-25.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-25-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-25-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>4. Sand the rear lug notch with a dremel tool equipped with a small sanding drum with a rough grit. This will create a hollow ground lug.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-23.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-23.jpg" alt="" data-id="10517" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-23.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/008-23-3/#main" class="wp-image-10517" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-23.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-23-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-23-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>5. Square the shoulder of the lug with a dremel tool equipped with a stone wheel. After this, compare lug and notch to the Soviet magazine and trial fit in weapon. Adjust fit by adding or removing material as required.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-17.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-17.jpg" alt="" data-id="10518" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-17.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/009-17-3/#main" class="wp-image-10518" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-17.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-17-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-17-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>6. Finish squaring the rear lug and notch with a fine tooth Rattail file. Trial fit in the weapon. Verify the magazine feed lip height is the same as with the Soviet magazine. At this point we discovered that the Romanian magazines were slightly  LONGER than their Soviet counter-parts! Undeterred, we scratched our heads, took a long haul off our Coca -Cola Classics and ventured forth.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-12.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-12.jpg" alt="" data-id="10519" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-12.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/010-12-4/#main" class="wp-image-10519" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-12-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-12-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>7. To fix this problem we used a dremel tool equipped with a fine cutting disk to cut a slot down the front corner of each side approximately one inch. Moving back 1/8 of an inch from the original top cut, we sliced a ‘V’ cut that ended where the original cut ended. Then we removed the wedge.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-9.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="490" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-9.jpg" alt="" data-id="10520" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-9.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/011-9-4/#main" class="wp-image-10520" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-9.jpg 490w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-9-210x300.jpg 210w" sizes="(max-width: 490px) 100vw, 490px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>8. Place the functioning Soviet magazine and the Romanian project magazine side by side over the center of the vice with the rear locking lugs resting on top of vice jaws and the front lugs up against the inner face of the vice jaws. Draw the vice jaws closed until gently snug. This will set the distance for the length of the Romanian magazine. Gently slide Soviet magazine out without disturbing vice.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-6.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-6.jpg" alt="" data-id="10521" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-6.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/012-6-4/#main" class="wp-image-10521" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-6-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-6-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>9. Tack weld both sides of the magazine just below the height of the front lug. Carefully check the magazine&#8217;s fit in firearm.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-4.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-4.jpg" alt="" data-id="10522" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-4.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/013-4-4/#main" class="wp-image-10522" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-4-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-4-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>10. Place magazine back in the vice and carefully weld the seam closed. Beware of burn-through on the lower part of cut where the metal is the thinnest.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-4.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-4.jpg" alt="" data-id="10523" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-4.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/014-4-5/#main" class="wp-image-10523" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-4-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-4-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>11. Using a dremel tool with a sanding drum, blend in the corners until the desired shape is achieved. Examine the inner corners of your weld and remove any slag or burn-through that would interfere with the movement of the follower.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-4.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="624" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-4.jpg" alt="" data-id="10524" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-4.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/015-4-4/#main" class="wp-image-10524" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-4.jpg 624w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-4-267x300.jpg 267w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-4-600x673.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 624px) 100vw, 624px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>12. It may be necessary to sand and polish the front strap of the follower. Check to make sure that the follower moves easily. Luckily, it seems that the Romanian followers are the same length as the Soviet followers, go figure.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="359" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-3.jpg" alt="" data-id="10525" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-3.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/016-3-5/#main" class="wp-image-10525" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-3-300x154.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-3-600x308.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>13. Using a benchgrinder remove the feed ramp to just above the forward sides of the magazine. Then use a small fine grit sanding drum to duplicate the feed notches in the front strap of the magazine. Magazines in photo are from left to right, Soviet 5 rounder, our modified Romanian magazine, and original Romanian magazine.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-2.jpg" alt="" data-id="10526" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-2.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/017-2-5/#main" class="wp-image-10526" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-2-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-2-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption">14. Prepare the front lug surface for welding. Then using the outlined for the rear lug, add material to the front lug and grind to shape. Trial fit in the firearm making sure to keep the feed ramp the same height as the Soviet magazine&#8217;s to ensure proper feeding. Also make sure that the front strap height is the same as the Soviet magazine&#8217;s.</figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="490" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-2.jpg" alt="" data-id="10527" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-2.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/10/01/feeding-the-dragon/018-2-5/#main" class="wp-image-10527" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-2-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-2-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>15. Final fitting for front lug should be accomplished by hand as per rear lug.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p>SOURCES<br><br>K-VAR<br>1-702-364-8880<br><br>KALASHNIKOV-USA-LTD<br>1-800-784-5677</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDF Mauser M-66 SP Sniper Rifle</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/idf-mauser-m-66-sp-sniper-rifle/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF Mauser M-66 SP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IWA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military sniper rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Pikula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Sam Pikula Military sniper rifles have always commanded a special place of fascination among small arms enthusiasts and collectors for a number of reasons. First of all, the number of true sniping rifles has always been very small in relation to other standard issue military weapons and this scarcity has made them rather rare. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Sam Pikula</strong><br><br>Military sniper rifles have always commanded a special place of fascination among small arms enthusiasts and collectors for a number of reasons. First of all, the number of true sniping rifles has always been very small in relation to other standard issue military weapons and this scarcity has made them rather rare. Another reason is that these rifles often represented the pinnacle of small arms achievement for a particular army or period. Quite simply they were the best that could be manufactured at the time. Finally, there has always been a mystique surrounding snipers, their rifles, and the legendary “one shot one kill”. Most of us are in awe at the amount of skill, discipline, and courage it takes to be a true sniper. Of the scores of military surplus weapons I’ve owned over the years the one that intrigued me most was a very well used and somewhat beat up No. 1 Mark IV T .303 Enfield Sniper that had obviously seen a lot of action. Yes, new in the box M1 C and D sniper rifles have their charm, but if you want a sniper rifle with character, it must be one that was used for real.<br><br>At the last International Waffen Exposition in Nurnburg, Germany (IWA for short) I saw a rifle at Springfield Armory’s exhibit that really turned my head. Springfield had made a purchase from the Israeli government of 90 Mauser M-66 SP sniper rifles in 7.62 NATO. OK, I’m not a big bolt gun guy-I mean manually operated weapons don’t usually do much for me, but this was no ordinary bolt action. You see, all of these rifles were actually used in frontline service by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) and had character oozing from every pore. Once back in the States I contacted Springfield Armory and arranged for one to be delivered to me for testing.<br><br>In about a month the rifle arrived and I promptly gave it a thorough inspection. Like the one I saw at IWA Show, I would rate this specimen in “Very Good +” condition. All of the steel parts were Parkerized and only the sharp contours displayed any wear. As expected, the walnut stock had the usual dings, scratches, scuffs, and scrapes that occur through normal use, but none were extraordinary. In actuality, any rifle that was used for 19 years by the Israeli Army and is still in good shape is almost a minor miracle. I had the opportunity to spend some time in the mid-80’s with the IDF and it was an eye opening experience. I mean the Israeli Army is extremely hard on their weapons. I’ve seen mech infantry troops on top of M-113 armored personnel carriers throw their rucksacks to the ground and toss their Galils right after them. I once asked an Israeli platoon sergeant how he liked the CAR-15 he was carrying and he replied, “I don’t-it won’t work unless you clean it”.<br><br>The Springfield representative at the IWA pointed out that all of the Star of David acceptance stamps had been ground off the weapon prior to their leaving Israel and the one I held was also sans IDF proofs. Curiously, my Israeli rebuilt 98k Mauser in 7.62 NATO that I got long ago was released with all the Israeli proofs still on it (although every swastika was understandably effaced).<br><br>The Mauser M-66 SP, or what Springfield Armory calls the “IDF Mauser M-66 SP” is a big heavy gun. I mean at 13.5 pounds with an overall length of 46.5 inches it ain’t buckets of fun packing this piece around in the bush- although I learned long ago just about anything is portable when enough willpower is applied, and “fun” is often a matter of perspective. When I first glanced at the IDF M-66 SP in Nurnburg, I deduced how the Israeli’s employed this weapon and a subsequent conversation with Springfield Armory President Tom Reese confirmed it. These rifles were set up in bunkers and static positions on Israel’s borders in places such as the Golan Heights and Gaza Strip. There was no need to pack them around so weight wasn’t a problem. What did matter is accuracy and I can say that it is one damn accurate rifle, but more of that later.<br><br>As a design the M-66 SP, like many sniper rifles traces its roots to a civilian sporting rifle. The action was designed in the 1950’s by Walter Gehman, world record setting German “Master Shooter”, expert ballistician, and small arms engineer. Mauser put Gehman’s creation, known in Germany as the “Gehman-Short Action” into production in 1965. In 1971, German police, like many other law enforcement organizations at the time, began to search for weapons, create tactics, and form units to fight terrorism. The bloody attack by Arab terrorists at the 1972 Munich Olympics caused Mauser to design a precision sniping version of the M-66. After eight years of development the weapon was ready to be put into production and was designated as the “SP” variant of the M-66. All M-66 SP rifles had to group five shots in a two-centimeter diameter group at 100 meters. Only 360 of these rifles were produced with almost all of them being manufactured in 1980. Mauser suspended production of all M-66 rifles in 1995.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="386" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-52.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10530" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-52.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-52-300x165.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-52-600x331.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The IDF Mauser M-66 SP is an impressive looking weapon and captured quite a bit of attention at the range.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The M-66 SP sports a 24.5” barrel with the last three inches composed of a rather beefy muzzle brake/flash hider. The cold forged chromium vanadium barrel is heavy and free floating-like one would expect from such a rifle and has a 1 in 12, four groove, right hand twist. The bore was in outstanding condition- a round mirror from throat to crown. The muzzle brake has ten vertical slots, five on each side with a transverse slot just behind the exit hole angled rearward at 45 degrees, and is serial numbered to the gun. I can’t imagine why a group of snipers or armorers would get together and decide to remove their muzzle brakes and mix them up, but then again more inane things than that have occurred.<br><br>The thumbhole walnut stock is massive. As stated earlier, these guns were built by Mauser in 1980- not all that long ago to preclude the use of a synthetic stock. There is a bit of gunsmith wisdom that goes, “the tree is not dead until it is burned”. Apparently to avoid some of the problems with impact shift and warpage the good folks at Oberndorf decided to make the stocks oversized to compensate. There is a large spring-loaded adjustable cheek piece that is held in place by a large set bolt. The adjustable cheek piece is a moot point as the rifle is most comfortable when locked all the way down. At one time there was sharp stippling in the forearm and pistol grip area reminiscent of that found on some Olympic target rifles, but has been smoothed out from use. The free- floating action is held in the stock with three large hex bolts. The sporting versions of the M-66 have barrels that are easily removable and interchangeable with no other tool than an Allen wrench. The SP model however, was not designed with this feature and I didn’t even contemplate trying to lift the action.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="403" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-50.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10531" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-50.jpg 403w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-50-173x300.jpg 173w" sizes="(max-width: 403px) 100vw, 403px" /><figcaption><em>Though used in harsh desert combat by the Israeli army, the M-66 SP nevertheless displayed excellent accuracy such as this 100 yard 3/4&#8243; group (bolt has been removed from rifle).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The action is well, different-not bad by any means, just different . Yeah, it’s a Mauser, but it’s greatly removed from the Model 98. It still uses the venerable two front locking lugs found on most bolt guns, however the bolt is guided on the receiver by a sleeve which in turn moves back and forth when the action is worked. Bolt length is short, just over five inches, and the bolt travel is four and a quarter inches. I would rate the action as being smoother and the lock time quicker than that of a standard 98k, M1903 Springfield, or the current M-24. The safety is located on the right rear of the bolt and is easy to manipulate. Pushing it rearward makes the weapon safe and the opposite motion enables it to fire. There is no bridge on the rear of the receiver, nothing at all like you’d find on a 98’. Since there’s no bridge the ejector is a spring-loaded plunger in the bolt ala’ the M-1 Garand or M-24. The bolt handle is the safety lug as it fits down into a notch in the right side of the receiver when the rifle is in battery. To remove the bolt you lift up on the bolt handle, press down on a stamped button on the right side of action, and remove the bolt and sleeve. That’s it. Assembly is in reverse order.<br><br>While we’re on the subject of the action, I should mention that the M-66 SP only holds three rounds of 7.62 NATO. In order to increase rigidity in the stock a blind magazine is used. I’ve never owned a centerfire rifle that held so few rounds but I guess if you’re one of those guys that grabbed the pebble from the Master’s palm on the first try and are really into the Zen of the one shot hit, then three rounds is probably enough.<br><br>But what’s a sniper rifle without a good scope? The IDF Mauser comes with a really top of the line glass: a Swarovski 6X42 MM with a 200-1000 meter range finding scale in the field of view somewhat like you find on a SVD PSO-1 scope, but much simpler. The crosshairs are the traditional Teutonic design of a heavy cross hair at the 3,6, and 9 o’clock position, and thin crosshairs in the middle and at 12 o’clock. This is a really nice tube and the clarity is like looking through clean mountain air on a cold day. The elevation drum at the top has positions on it corresponding to the range scale on the reticle, and has “M118” engraved on it so there was no mystery as to the kind of ammo it was designed for. The objective bell of the scope is sheathed in a thick rubber jacket to help protect the piece from the inevitable dings and bangs that are drawn to any precision instrument designed for troops. The scope tube itself is standard European in diameter- 30 MM. The scope rings and mounts are solid steel, extremely beefy, and appear to be just about bulletproof. My only complaint about the sighting system is that there are no emergency iron sights.<br><br>To test the rifle I grabbed a bucket full of match ammo and went to one of the premier ranges in the southwest, the Rio Salado Sportsman’s Club in Mesa, Arizona. Due to time constraints I was only able to set up on the main range that goes out to 335 yards, but that was enough distance to see what the rifle is capable of. Starting out at 100 yards and dipping into my stock of M118 Lake City Match I was able to get three shot groups that measured just under an inch. Yeah I know, not spectacular as even my SVD can beat that. Switching to Federal Gold Medal Match though, brought much better results. Groups began running from just one-half to three-quarters of an inch. Usually two shots would pair into one hole and the third would break formation a quarter or half-inch away. A lot of this was due to the wind picking up and starting to gust at 10-20 knots as the morning wore on. Just for the heck of it I threw some standard Austrian military ball down the barrel and my groups still weren’t much larger than an inch.<br><br>Once I got the rifle dialed in, no target on the range was safe from a one shot hit. Of course, all shooting was done from the bench so the credit belongs to the rifle and not to me. At two hundred yards the rifle easily got center head hits on a pepper popper. A ten- inch hanging steel plate at three hundred yards was easy prey. The furthest target at 335 yards, a life size, self resetting, steel prairie dog, had the snot knocked out of it (OK, I did miss a couple of times-my fault not the guns). The M-66 SP’s excellent three and half pound trigger pull was also a large factor in achieving this accuracy. During the test, I fired a tad over 100 rounds and as expected encountered no difficulties. At each ten shot interval I ran a brush dipped in solvent and five or six patches down the barrel to clean it out. I didn’t detect any difference in group size after these cleanings, but a rifle like this should be given a little extra attention.<br><br>It should be no surprise that I heartily recommend and endorse this rifle. In fact, after shooting this sucker I did what no gunwriter should do if he wants to turn a buck in this business-I bought the test rifle. This is a once in a lifetime chance to own a real piece of history that can also be taken to the range and shot without guilt. Of the 360 SP’s that Mauser produced only 100 went to Israel.<br><br>Now if you absolutely can’t live with a bolt gun or would like to have a really awesome collection of IDF sniper rifles, Springfield has also imported the parts sets from the 600 M-14 sniper rifles the IDF also used in combat and assembled them on their excellent M1-A receivers. In 1984 I was with IDF for a short time in South Lebanon at Beaufort Castle and saw one of these M-14’s in the hands of an IDF sniper. Like the M-66 SP, these IDF M-14/M1A’s are also special guns. The Israeli’s built up the cheek piece on the wooden stock and added a rubber recoil pad. They also added a steel scope mount that held a 6X40 Israeli “Nimrod” scope and fitted the weapon with a Harris bipod. Springfield offers the same rifle with an AN/PVS-2 night vision scope. Price of the IDF Mauser M-66 SP is $2225.00 retail with the IDF M-14/Nimrod scope going for $1875.00 and $2229.00 for one with an AN/PVS-2 night vision scope. For more information contact Springfield, Inc., 420 West Main St., Geneseo, IL, 61254 telephone 309-944-5631.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Soldier of Fortune Convention Las Vegas, NV</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-soldier-of-fortune-convention-las-vegas-nv/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1 (Oct 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dolf Goldsmith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff W. Zimba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Lomont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOF Firepower Demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soldier Of Fortune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Jeff W. Zimba The 20th Annual Soldier of Fortune Convention &#38; Consumer / Trade Exposition was held September 22-26, 1999. As many times before, this particular event was hosted in Las Vegas, but in a different location than usual. Regular attendees who have become accustomed to visiting the show at the Sands Expo Center [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Jeff W. Zimba</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="382" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-45.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10534" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-45.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-45-300x164.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-45-600x327.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p>The 20th Annual Soldier of Fortune Convention &amp; Consumer / Trade Exposition was held September 22-26, 1999. As many times before, this particular event was hosted in Las Vegas, but in a different location than usual. Regular attendees who have become accustomed to visiting the show at the Sands Expo Center were in for a surprise this year. Unlike years past this event was held at the Cashman Center, which is located on North Las Vegas Blvd., a short drive North from Freemont Street. The location may have changed this year, but the convention remained better than ever.<br><br>To those who have not had the pleasure of attending the convention, it is divided into many different aspects taking place over a five-day period. There is a great gun show, many seminars, shooting matches, manufacturers demonstrations, a banquet, an auction and the world famous SOF Firepower Demo. If there was ever chance of running out of things to do in Las Vegas (not even remotely likely), the SOF Convention will assure you have plenty to do.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="419" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-53.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10536" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-53.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-53-300x180.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-53-309x186.jpg 309w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-53-600x359.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Gun Show</strong><br><br>This gun show is a gathering of the Who’s Who of the Gun World. You will have the opportunity here to meet many of the people you read about in the trade publications. Those who have a booth at this show may be manufacturers, distributors, designers, or authors. A few of the display categories covered are ammunition, firearms, knives, military equipment, police equipment, preparedness, security and training. Chances are pretty good that if you are looking for something related to the above you will find it here. A few of the more notable folks who were in attendance at the 1999 show included; Johns Guns, Lancer Militaria, Lomont Precision Bullets, Bushmaster Firearms, Barrett Firearms, H&amp;K, Benchmade, Gemtech, and many others (SAR was there of course!). This gathering is a great place to talk with many of the people who build the products we use every day.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="486" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-52.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10537" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-52.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-52-300x208.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-52-600x417.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Kathy Lomont poses with a Polish Browning prior to the Firepower Demonstration.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="497" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-46.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10538" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-46.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-46-300x213.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-46-600x426.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Author John Ross autographs a copy of his novel “Unintended Consequences” as Dr. Phil Dater of Gemtech stands by.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="466" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-41.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10539" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-41.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-41-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-41-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Bushmaster Firearms from our home State of Maine is a regular exhibitor at the SOF Convention.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="466" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10540" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-29.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-29-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-29-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Accuracy International with their target from the Manufacturers Demo. Inset shows Carl Kovalchik firing their Model AW50, .50 BMG rifle at the Demo.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="691" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-26.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10541" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-26.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-26-300x296.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-26-600x592.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-26-100x100.jpg 100w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Dolf Goldsmith, author of “The Devils Paintbrush” and member of the Emma Gees Demo Team is shown with a Vickers at the Desert Sportsmans Range.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="466" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-24.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10542" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-24.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-24-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-24-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Team Savage, a fictitious all female military operations group was in attendance at the 1999 SOF Convention. They were promoting their new military calendar. If they look familiar, you may have seen them in the televised 50th Commemorative World War II Parade in New York City.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="324" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10543" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-18-300x139.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-18-600x278.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A beautiful .30 caliber Marlin Arms Corp. Potato Digger. Inset photo shows detail of the markings on receiver. Many rare and unusual firearms are on display every year at the Firepower Demonstration hosted by the Arizona Emma Gees.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Seminars</strong><br><br>There is a wealth of knowledge and information to be tapped at this portion of the convention. Topics range from the mild to the wild and many of the speakers are people who have been there and done that. The seminars are usually divided among the entire convention with none overlapping allowing the conventioneer to sit in on as many topics as desired. A few of the 1999 topics included; Anti-Poaching In South Africa, Building The Low Cost Shoot House, The Future Of Gun Rights, Marine Snipers In Vietnam, Urban Traps And Trapping, and many more. Some of the speakers in charge of the seminars were; Jim Fotis, Col. Jeff Cooper, Peter G. Kokalis, and Ragnar Benson. The seminars were split up between the Cashman Center and the Palace Station Hotel.<br><br><strong>“Other Participatory Events”</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="523" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10544" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-10-300x224.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-10-600x448.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Alex Robinson fires the M96 Expeditionary Rifle during the manufacturers demo.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The convention provides a “hands-on” opportunity for those interested in learning new arts and sharpening their skills in many areas. These sometimes require an amount of physical conditioning and may not necessarily be for the beginner. The topics, skills and arts have covered many disciplines in years past, and a few those available for 1999 were; Combat Martial Arts and Weapon Retention, Hand to Hand Combat, Street Knife Basics, and even Underwater Escape Techniques using an underwater crash simulator brought all the way from Alaska by Learn to Return Training Systems.<br><br><strong>Manufacturers Demo</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="466" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10545" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-7-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-7-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Larry Bullock of Buffer Technologies displays his products at the show.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>This year the manufacturers demo was broken up into 3 days. New for the 1999 convention, a group of manufacturers brought out their new products at the Desert Sportsman’s Range for a little hands on T&amp;E. If you were a conventioneer or competitor, you were welcome to do your own hands-on live fire evaluation at no cost. The ammunition was provided by Hornady Ammunition for this event. Manufacturers in attendance at the Demo included; John’s Guns, GSI Steyr, L.A.R. Manufacturing, SIG Arms, Robar Co., Armalite Inc, Olympic Arms, Vector Arms and others.<br><br><strong>The Firepower Demo</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10546" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-5-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-5-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Three “regulars” of the firepower demo pause for a quick photo at the range. L to R. Dan Shea, Dolf Goldsmith, and Kent Lomont.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>This is one of the most popular events of the convention. It is both educational and entertaining and is certainly one of the authors favorite parts. Peter Kokalis is the annual Emcee and the demo is put on with a lot of hard work and preparation by the Arizona Emma Gees. Upon reporting to the range this year I was met by Peter almost immediately. He gave me a little input on the articles I have done in the past on this event and brought me out on the firing line. “Look at this” he said pointing to a beautiful Polish BAR. “This is what your readers want to see.” He took me up the line, pointed out a few more nice guns and got ready to start the noise.<br><br>The event started with an introduction of each firearm, a little history about the caliber, origin, conflicts it may have been involved in and we are treated to a short burst to hear the cyclic rate as compared to others. We are introduced to each shooter at the same time. After this brief introduction, the line is opened up and the thunder of machine gun fire combined with pyrotechnics can be heard for miles around. The firepower demo portion of the convention usually runs an hour to an hour and a half and judging by the faces of the crowd, it is enjoyed by all.<br><br><strong>The 2000 Convention</strong><br><br>This year, Soldier of Fortune is celebrating their 25th Anniversary so you know this will be a convention you won’t want to miss. It is happening again at the Cashman Center in Las Vegas, October 11-15. To inquire about the convention you can reach SOF at (303)449-3750 ext. 300.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10547" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-5-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-5-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>John Tibbetts of John’s Guns in Palestine, Texas is a well known suppressor manufacturer who regularly attends the convention.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10548" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-5-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-5-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Todd Hatch fires the RC50F .50 BMG rifle during the manufacturers demo.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10549" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-4-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-4-600x399.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A rare Polish BAR on display rests on the firing line of the firepower demonstration.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N1 (October 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
