<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>V5N10 (Jul 2002) &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/category/articles/articles-by-issue-articles/v5/v5n10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:53:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SITREP: JULY 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/sitrep-july-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITREP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Dan Shea Ah, Summertime, when a young man’s thoughts turn to machine gun shoots. Warm, balmy weekends spent pouring a week’s paycheck downrange with friends, piling up the brass, lacerating assorted sand pit targets. Fixing guns, shooting old and new machine guns. Showing off new acquisitions. Others are out, driving their odd military vehicles [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Dan Shea</strong><br><br>Ah, Summertime, when a young man’s thoughts turn to machine gun shoots. Warm, balmy weekends spent pouring a week’s paycheck downrange with friends, piling up the brass, lacerating assorted sand pit targets. Fixing guns, shooting old and new machine guns. Showing off new acquisitions. Others are out, driving their odd military vehicles around, gathering with like minded folk, setting up reenactment camps and events.<br><br>There will be Brass Maxim shoots, Gatling Gatherings, and general Mad Minutes from the members of the shooting community, as well as long range shooting competitions. Just people exercising their Right to Keep and Bear Arms.<br><br>Such gatherings predate recorded history. In every society we have a record of, we have evidence of their martial training and sports, as they kept their young men prepared to defend their countries, or to go out and conquer other lands. The older men kept their trophies of wars and adventures- they always have. I suppose someone could point out a society where such things didn’t exist, but I will bet it was short-lived, having been absorbed by more martial neighbors as they rampaged around. Nice little Utopia while it lasted&#8230; to bad they couldn’t defend themselves, I would say to the peaceniks who might bring it up. I guess I have a closed mind on the subject- you have to be able to defend yourself and your loved ones, as well as your country.<br><br>There will always be bad guys, and sometimes that is just a matter of perspective. No matter, you still have to be able to defend yourself, or “You Lose”.<br><br>On the flip side, there are millions of good guys out there right now, doing it for real, in uniform. Many have no inkling of where their Freedom came from, modern public education’s revisionist bent to blame. It never ceases to amaze me how many members of our military will say “Only the military should have weapons”. Amazing lack of perception, although, I suspect it is understandable with the current “Peace keeping” craze. When you have to keep various small cultures from killing off each other’s families, you might start to think it prudent to disarm everyone who doesn’t “Need” a weapon- meaning the “Peace keeping” forces.<br><br>If you dig deeper, however, you will find a core of people who have a different experience. American soldiers who served from the Vietnam War backwards, had experience with seeing “Refugees”, in long time situations. In particular, many World War II veterans will still quietly talk today about the shambles Europe was in, and how the people lost everything- they couldn’t defend themselves.<br><br>This perception is the flip side of the same coin. Many of our troops in Afghanistan are fighting against men who own their personal AK47- they bought it, they clean it, they feed it. I do not think them to be the Freedom Fighters which they consider themselves- Holy Warriors as it were. Presently, they are the enemy.<br><br>The example here is one to remember, however, in that the prudent man is always aware of how to defend himself. I hope that our young men and women who view this situation do not misread it and say that guns in the hands of the public are bad- but that they understand the freedom to own firearms and weapons has neither a good effect or a bad effect on its own. It is what you do with them. It is what the people who own the weapons are like.<br><br>When one society decides to murder the innocents in another society, well, they are going to pay the consequences of that action. At least, if we maintain the resolve and the force necessary, they will pay.<br><br>Then, another generation of Americans will come home, and hang their odd memorabilia on the wall, or put it in a photo album, or, perhaps keep it out of sight unless they meet others who were there. It’s all their choice. I do hope, however, that they join the rest of us at the sandpit, at the local shooting range, and at the events we gather at. They will be welcomed.<br><br>&#8211; Dan</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>INDUSTRY NEWS: JULY 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/industry-news-july-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert M.Hausman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert M. Hausman Crucial Retailer Issues Covered in Seminars Some of the most important issues facing Class 3 firearms retailers comprised the topics presented during the various seminars held during the 2002 S.H.O.T. Show. These included security issues, business insurance and customer target marketing. All of this made for one of the best professional [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Robert M. Hausman</strong><br><br><strong>Crucial Retailer Issues Covered in Seminars</strong><br><br>Some of the most important issues facing Class 3 firearms retailers comprised the topics presented during the various seminars held during the 2002 S.H.O.T. Show. These included security issues, business insurance and customer target marketing. All of this made for one of the best professional development programs for firearms retailers ever offered in the S.H.O.T. Show’s entire history.<br><br><strong>Loss Prevention</strong><br><br>The most heavily-attended seminar was entitled, “Loss Prevention Techniques for Today’s Retailer.” The presenters, which included Benjamin Hayes, special agent/program manager of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco &amp; Firearms’ Stolen Firearms Program, began by advising retailers to determine how secure their businesses are.<br><br>“The presence of firearms increases your risk of burglary, theft and losses,” Hayes said. “As a federal firearms licensee, you have a responsibility to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, but firearms theft is not your only risk. (General merchandise) retailers lost $32.3 billion last year. According to the 2001 National Retail Security Survey, 46% of losses were attributed to employees, 31% to shoplifters, 17% to paperwork errors and 6% to problems with vendors.”<br><br>To increase the physical security of their business premises, Hayes advised retailers to: make an analysis of the business site and determine the types of security issues that could arise; harden the perimeter of the building; install vehicle barriers at entrances and large windows to prevent “drive-in” burglaries; install burglar bars, protective glass film, or roll down or curtain style gates at all windows; reinforce all roof openings; put heavy locks on all doors; install shatter-proof display cases to prevent “smash and grab” thefts; install a burglar alarm as well as fixture and display alarms; and, install both public view closed circuit television cameras as well as covert units.<br><br>All doors should be heavy duty or reinforced models installed on a heavy-duty frame with high-security hinges, retailers were advised. Industrial grade hardware should be chosen for all locksets. Doors and locking hardware can be purchased with anti-pry and anti-spread designs and mechanisms with a minimum of hardware exposed on the exterior side. The installation of door viewers in solid doors was also suggested.<br><br>Display cases should have their glass tops secured to prevent lifting and have tight-fitting doors that cannot be lifted or removed. Customers should never be shown more than one firearm at a time. Make certain your employees understand that they cannot show another firearm until after the first gun handled by a customer has been safely replaced within the display case.<br><br>When reviewing site security, consider such issues as: parking and building access; proximity to freeways and escape routes; outside lighting; the presence of trees, foliage and other concealment; the proximity of adjacent buildings (oftentimes burglars will break into one building in order to gain access to an adjacent structure); the amount of reported crime in the area; and, average police response time.<br><br>Signage can often prevent theft. Some stores post signs on their premises advising customers that all firearms are placed in locked storage after business hours. Stockrooms and vaults should be of reinforced wall construction and be inaccessible through roof openings. Heavy-duty hardware should be used on the stockroom doors along with alarm protection.<br><br>The use of burglar alarm systems was called “a must” for every firearms retailer. It was advised that complete protection should include: central station monitoring; line security or cellular back-up; interior motion detection; glass break devices; door contacts; motion detectors for the roof or perimeter openings; and, an audible local alarm.<br><br><strong>Employee Monitoring</strong><br><br>Since employee theft problems are a major source of retailer losses, attendees were advised to: institute key control and alarm access procedures; be careful of who they hire by running background checks on prospective employees; have a clear separation of responsibilities for all employees; conduct regular firearms inventories; institute cash control systems; review trash removal procedures to insure merchandise is not leaving the store with “the trash”; monitor the employee parking area; and, check packages leaving your store.<br><br>In reviewing key control and alarm access procedures, retailers were advised to: minimize the number of key holders; issue showcase or stockroom keys daily and to not let these keys leave the store; never share alarm codes &#8211; set up unique pass codes for each employee; review your store’s opening and closing procedures with employees weekly.<br><br>The best way to prevent firearms thefts by employees is to conduct regular inventories, it was explained. Inventories should be conducted at least once per quarter year, but monthly would be even better. Verify the presence of firearms by matching the serial number to the acquisitions and disposition log of your bound book; and, don’t just read the serial numbers off the end of the gun boxes, open the boxes to ensure the firearms are really there.<br><br>Finally, retailers were advised to “inspect what they expect” by conducting self-audits. This will allow you to make sure the controls you have developed are being followed. The self-audits can also be used to train your supervisors and employees. Firearms retailers have a unique responsibility to society at large, their local communities and their employees. With the proper analysis and choices, you will find the path to better profits and safer workplaces and communities.<br><br><strong>Insurance</strong><br><br>Since concerns over the need for, and the cost of, insurance, is on the minds of most retailers in today’s litigious age, another presentation entitled, “A Smart Approach to Insurance,” was offered. Basic insurance principles, market conditions, loss trends, retailer risk management, as well as sources for help, were covered by Robert V. Chiarello of Joseph Chiarello &amp; Co., Inc. and Valerie A. Lowe of AIG Consultants, Inc.<br><br>Property insurance can be purchased to provide a variety of protections against loss covering such areas as real property, personal business property, property in transit, loss due to crime, and protection against business interruption. Homeowners insurance policies usually excludes coverage for business pursuits, Chiarello noted while stressing the need for separate policies for your business.<br><br>In a review of the history of the insurance market in recent years, the presenters said that from 1985 to 1987 premiums increased as there were few willing insurers for the firearms industry. Many manufacturers during these years, operated without product liability insurance.<br><br>From 1988 to 2000, the market changed as there were many insurers competing for business. Premiums decreased as insurers became less selective of what businesses they would insure. As a result, many insurers did not require their insured to maintain loss control programs as they became more willing to accept losses.<br><br>In late 2000 to 2001, the insurance market changed again due to such factors as the crash of the dot.com stocks, unexpected severe weather related claims, an increase in asbestos case claims, the general economic recession and the events of September 11, 2001.<br><br>Currently, the insurance market is becoming increasingly restricted. New insurance companies are entering the firearms arena due to recent insurance premium rate increases. The reality of this situation, the presenters believe, is that since many insurers abandoned the firearms arena in the recent past, many of those entering the market now will not succeed. Many major carriers, such as Frontier, C.N.A., Gulf, The Home, Northland, Travelers and I.N.A. are no longer offering coverage to firearms businesses. One of the major firms that is still offering coverage is A.I.G. which is considered a stable and strong firm with an established program for firearms retailers.<br><br><strong>Implement a Risk Management Plan</strong><br><br>The best way retailers can position themselves for obtaining cost-effective insurance from a reliable carrier is by implementing risk management strategies, Chiarello and Lowe advised. Knowing the historical trends in retail losses can help you to devise a risk management strategy.<br><br>Using a variety of charts, Chiarello &amp; Lowe presented a history of retail losses. Property damage, comprising 29% of total losses is the most common form of loss, followed by smash &amp; grab thefts at 25%, falls at 9%, claims from sales and struck by (such as display cases falling on customers) at 5% each, products causing injury and accidental discharge at 4% each, and miscellaneous incidents at 15%.<br><br>Next, examples of high cost losses were detailed. These included: a $400,000 claim for the sale of black powder to an adult. The purchaser gave it to a group of children who used it to make fireworks. It exploded, and burned all three of the children. A $281,000 claim was paid in a case involving an adult who bought a firearm and ammunition. The buyer loaded the gun (which discharged) in his car. Some $164,000 was paid out by an insurance company on behalf of a retailer in a case where a child pulled a safe over onto herself in a store. A $155,000 claim was paid to a customer who slipped and fell on the sidewalk outside a retailer’s store.<br><br>Other loss scenarios involved: a dealer accused of negligence in the sale of a firearm resulting in the shooting of a third party; a dealer accused of selling incorrect ammunition; a retailer accused of not providing an owner’s manual; a retailer accused of not providing instruction on the safe handling of a firearm; and, a dealer who subcontracted work to an uninsured gunsmith.<br><br>The benefits for retailers in implementing a risk management plan, Chiarello &amp; Lowe said, are a reduced frequency of losses, a reduction in the severity of losses, an improvement in bottom line profitability and an improvement in your insurability. The process of developing a plan involves identifying potential risk/loss sources within your business, developing risk management strategies to control those losses and implementing those strategies.<br><br><strong>Targeting Your Customers</strong><br><br>Tips on how hunting and shooting sports retailers can gain and retain their customers for the long term, were detailed in a seminar entitled, “An Outdoorsman For Life, Targeting Your Customers.” Presenters Vic Romano, NSSF’s vp/marketing and strategic partnerships, along with Bob McKim, president and CEO of MSDBM, a firm offering database-driven, technology-enabled marketing solutions and customer relationship management systems, detailed how and why retailers should turn shooters into lifetime customers.<br><br><strong>Information is Key</strong><br><br>“Knowing who your customers and prospects are, understanding where your customers are in their life-stages and purchase life-cycles, will allow you to communicate the right message at the right time,” said McKim. “Information is the new currency in today’s fiercely competitive business environment. Having the right information on your customers will allow you to give your business a competitive advantage, help you define a business strategy, increase revenues by identifying the most profitable customers and reduce costs by limiting your marketing efforts to reach targeted customers.”<br><br>Romano said that by focusing the major part of your marketing efforts on your best customers you can realize as much as 80% of your store’s income from this group. “Spending money to reach casual and first time buyers should only be done if time and money permits,” he said.<br><br>Retailers should build a database of the names and addresses of their best customers segmented by attributes and use it to create customized mailing lists, Romano advised. Customer loyalty programs can be developed to reward your best customers and you can reach them economically by taking advantage of the bulk mailing rates offered by the U.S. Postal Service.<br><br><strong>Determining “Lifetime Value”</strong><br><br>In determining the “lifetime value” of a customer, retailers should think in terms of “share of customer, not share of market,” Romano said. “The lifetime value of a customer is the total contribution to overhead and profit during the customer’s total relationship with your business. The total number of years times the total purchases per year, less the cost of goods and marketing expenses is equal to a customer’s lifetime value. Making the move to data base marketing will allow you to move from the idea of ‘getting a sale now at any cost’ to building and managing customer data bases that track the lifetime value of your relationship with each customer and knowing when and what they are next likely to purchase.”<br><br>In conclusion, Romano said, “loyalty marketing is the key to success in today’s more competitive and complicated marketplace. Loyalty marketing increases profits, productivity and customer lifetime value. Retailers can start anywhere in this process. The important thing is that they just get started!”<br><br><em>The author publishes two of the small arms industry’s most widely read trade newsletters. The International Firearms Trade covers the world firearms scene, and The New Firearms Business covers the domestic market. Visit <a href="http://www.firearmsgroup.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.FirearmsGroup.com</a>. He may be reached at: <a href="mailto:FirearmsB@aol.com">FirearmsB@aol.com</a>.</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEW REVIEW: JULY 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/new-review-july-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris A. Choat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimson Trace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GG&G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K.G. Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lapua Signum™ .22 LR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muley-Pod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Chris A. Choat NEW BROWNING HIGH POWER LASERGRIPS FROM CRIMSON TRACE Crimson Trace has just announced the Browning Hi-Power grip as the latest addition to their extensive line of precision laser sights for handguns. Lasergrips for the Browning Hi-Power feature Crimson Trace’s instinctively activated laser sight within a carefully designed, rubber wrap-around stock. Low [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Chris A. Choat</strong><br><br><strong>NEW BROWNING HIGH POWER LASERGRIPS FROM CRIMSON TRACE</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="70" height="70" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001_t-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8362"/></figure></div>



<p>Crimson Trace has just announced the Browning Hi-Power grip as the latest addition to their extensive line of precision laser sights for handguns. Lasergrips for the Browning Hi-Power feature Crimson Trace’s instinctively activated laser sight within a carefully designed, rubber wrap-around stock. Low profile finger grooves and double palm swells provide a quick, comfortable grip registration. Lasergrips rubber overmold design boasts superior comfort with reduced felt recoil. The grips also feature dual activation pads that allow for easy, immediate laser activation, and the laser itself is fully adjustable for windage and elevation. Lasergrips fit standard handgun holsters and include a master on/off switch for complete system over-ride. The new grip fits most Hi-Power models and clones, including: Browning Hi-Power Standard, Mark II and Practical models, and FN Herstal Hi-Power model HP-SA. Recommended retail price for the new High Power grip is $329.00. For more information contact Crimson Trace Corporation, Dept. SAR, 8089 S.W. Cirrus Drive, Beaverton, OR 97008. Phone: 1-503-627-9992. Fax: 1-503-627-0166. Their website is <a href="https://www.crimsontrace.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.crimsontrace.com</a>.</p>



<p><strong>4-STEP FIREARM CLEANING FROM K.G. INDUSTRIES</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="70" height="70" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002_t.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8363"/></figure></div>



<p>Now you can professionally clean, restore and lube your prized firearms in just minutes. K.G. Industries, Inc. One of America’s leading manufacturers of a complete line of supreme kine of cleaning, coating and lubrication products for the firearms industry, now introduces a full-line of ammonia-free gun-care products. This new line is actually a 4-step product consisting of the new KG-1 Carbon Remover™, KG-2 Bore Restorer™, KG-3 Cleaning Solvent &amp; Degreaser™ and KG-4 Gun Oil™. These products make gun cleaning as easy as 1-2-3-4. KG-1 Carbon Remover dissolves carbon build-up on contact. KG-2 Bore Restorer polishes barrels, removes copper, lead and powder residue. KG-3 Solvent &amp; Degreaser rapidly cuts through oil and grease. KG-4 provides corrosion protection and lubrication. For years KG Industries has been recognized as a top supplier of innovative lubricants and protective coatings to such clients as the aerospace program, NASA and the US Military. For more information on their new 1-2-3-4 cleaning system as well as a full line of other coating and lubrication products contact KG Industries, Dept. SAR, 537 Louis Drive, Newbury Park, CA 91320 Phone: 1-800-348-9558. Fax: 1-805-499-4372. Website: www.kgproducts.net.<br><br><strong>REMINGTON 870 SHOTGUN SINGLE POINT SLING ATTACHMENT FROM GG&amp;G</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="70" height="70" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003_t.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8361"/></figure></div>



<p>The newest product from GG&amp;G industries is their Single Point Sling Attachment for the Remington 870 shotgun. Single point sling attachments have proven to have the “Tactical Advantage” over the standard “two point” sling attachments using the standard bottom mounted sling swivel. The new single point systems allow the operator to shoulder the weapon from either the right or left shoulder. This makes dynamic entries easier and it also becomes easier to “slice the pie” at doorways and while moving around corners without giving away the operators presence. Single Point Sling attachments also make it easier from users wearing body armor to deploy a sling mounted weapon as the sling attachment is now behind the receiver but in front of the buttstock. The new Remington 870 single point attachment is precisely machined from 7075 aircraft grade aluminum alloy and is anodized matte black. It will accommodate slings up to 1 1/4 inches in width and will also except the excellent Chalker sling system. It is easily user installed. This single point attachment can also be used in conjunction with a single point front mounting system to provide a dual-point mounting system. For more information contact GG&amp;G, Dept. SAR, 3602 E. 42nd Stravenue, Tucson, AZ 85713. Phone: 1-520-748-7167. Fax: 520-748-7583. Their website is <a href="https://www.gggaz.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.gggaz.com</a>.<br><br><strong>MULEY-POD BUTTSTOCK MONOPOD</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="70" height="70" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005_t.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8360"/></figure></div>



<p><br>One very interesting item that I ran across at this year’s SHOT SHOW was the Muley-Pod. It is a mono-pod device that attaches to the rear sling swivel on a rifles buttstock. When folded back it gives the shooter a rear rest that provides for a very firm support. When used with a front bipod like the excellent Harris bi-pod it allows a very steady rest for precise shot placement. The Muley-Pod is very well built from precision cast aluminum. It attaches to the standard sling swivel or in the case of the AR-15/M-16 to an adapter piece that is also available. The Muley-Pod incorporates a turn buckle design in which the center section is simple rotated to increase or decrease the buttstock height. The adjustment can be done with the shooters “off” hand while looking through the scope. It also allows shooters to acquire targets for long periods of time with less fatigue. This makes it ideal for SWAT and Military applications. The Muley-Pod has a swivel “foot” that has a non-slip rubber pad attached to it for a firm footing. The unit also has a built-in sling attachment point for use with a sling. When not in use the Muley-Pod folds forward against the bottom of the buttstock. It comes in three finishes black, matte (which looks like stainless) and metal ( which looks like nickel plate). It also comes in two heights, 9 inch and 5 inch. The new Muley-Pod is said to reduce recoil recovery time by as much as 80%. This outstanding device is made in America and is warranted for life. For more information contact Muley Enterprises, Dept. SAR, P.O. Box 137, Oakley, ID 83346. Phone: 1-208-862-9226.<br><br><strong>NEW LAPUA .22 LR AMMUNITION</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="628" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8359" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-16.jpg 628w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-16-269x300.jpg 269w" sizes="(max-width: 628px) 100vw, 628px" /></figure></div>



<p>Lapua, one of the world’s foremost manufacturers of match grade .22 long rifle ammunition, has just announced the introduction of a unique new multipurpose subsonic loading that features a specially lubricated bullet. Lapua Signum™ .22 LR ammunition utilizes a new coated 40 grain bullet that offers shooters the same benefits of coated bullets in centerfire loadings. It reduces bullet-to-bore friction, which makes obduration less violent and allows the bullet base, which is critical to accuracy, to resist deformation. The nose of the bullet is stamped with the Lapua trademark as an added means of identification. Muzzle velocity of the new ammunition is approximately 1075fps, making it firmly subsonic. This actually aids accuracy, as the bullet will not be subjected to any of the transonic buffeting experienced by faster projectiles as they decelerate through the sound barrier. Lapua has consistently achieved 10 shot group averages 15mm center to center at 50 meters. Signum™ bullets have 8 symmetrical horizontal and vertical lubricant grooves that are very evenly filled with lubricant so the barrel is lubricated homogeneously. This groove pattern absorbs about 15% more lubrication and distributes it over an area 50% greater than traditional lead bullets. This allows complete lubrication from chamber to muzzle. The lubrication also allows barrels to foul less readily and maintain peak accuracy for longer strings. For more information on the new ammo contact KalTron-Pettibone, Dept. SAR., 1241 Ellis Street, Bensenville, IL 60106. Phone: 1-630-350-1116. Fax: 1-630-350-1606. Their website is <a href="https://www.lapua.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.lapua.com</a>.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMALL ARMS DATA BY WIRE (SADW): JULY 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-july-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman Issue No 58- March 2002An Electronic Publication from:NICK STEADMAN FEATURESTel : 01273-773362,International +44-1273-773362Fax: 01273-822078,International +44-1273-822078SADW@compuserve.com LEUPOLD MARK 4 CQ/T OPTICAL SIGHT: chief among Leupold’s 2002 introductions http://www.leupold.com is the Mk 4 CQ/T 1-3x14mm optical sight, designed for use with tactical long guns such as the M16 (both flat-top and carrying-handle variants). It [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br>Issue No 58- March 2002<br>An Electronic Publication from:<br>NICK STEADMAN FEATURES<br>Tel : 01273-773362,<br>International +44-1273-773362<br>Fax: 01273-822078,<br>International +44-1273-822078<br>SADW@compuserve.com<br><br>LEUPOLD MARK 4 CQ/T OPTICAL SIGHT: chief among Leupold’s 2002 introductions http://www.leupold.com is the Mk 4 CQ/T 1-3x14mm optical sight, designed for use with tactical long guns such as the M16 (both flat-top and carrying-handle variants). It features a ring reticle with a centred dot and variable power from 1x to 3x. It can be illuminated in red or used ‘as is’, but there are ten brightness settings when the reticle illumination is employed.<br><br>At unity power the centre dot subtends 9 minutes of angle, and three minutes at 3x magnification. The ring subtends 18” at 25 yards or six feet at 100 yards (3x magnification), so can be used for range estimation, but we consider these figures for the ring element are way too high.<br><br>The sight, which Leupold says was developed in co-operation with military and police agencies around the world, will mount to Picatinny rails, and &#8211; for those with a yen for the Christmas Tree look, there are additional left, right and top Milspec mounting rails incorporated into its housing, It is 8.75” long and weighs 17.5 ounces without battery or mount.<br><br>Eye relief (optimized for the M16 series) is in the range 2.0” to 2.8”, depending on magnification, and the windage &amp; elevation drums offer half-minute click adjustments. Eyepiece focus can also be adjusted. The CQ/T is claimed to be submersible to a depth of 66 feet. Other features include low-intensity reticle settings for use with night vision devices. Battery life from one AA cell at maximum illumination is seven hours. No price was stated.<br><br>This is an interesting new product, but we fear Leupold has missed an opportunity with its reticle design. A ring which subtends six feet at 100 yards means it is almost irrelevant &#8211; only the centre dot is really of any value, making this scope (when all’s said and done) just another ‘dot sight’. A much better choice might have been something more along the lines of the smaller, thicker AUG ring reticle, with (if you like) a dot centred in it.<br><br>We say ‘if you like’, since the mere presence a dot within the AUG ring (police AUGs are supplied with a central dot or crosshairs) virtually compels the brain to take a more precise aim, wasting valuable time, whereas for normal infantry purposes aiming and delivery of effective fire has been shown to be faster with the AUG ring alone &#8211; in fact, military field tests have shown it’s second to nothing but iron sights for rapid engagement.<br><br>On the other hand, if the CQ/T is to be used in the police role, where greater precision may be needed, the dot might be the better option.<br><br>Be that as it may, from personal experience we can vouch that the self-centring principle of the AUG scope used with the standard plain ring reticle provides sufficient accuracy to hit man-sized targets every time at ranges to beyond 300 metres, even in a blizzard with very poor visibility, and regardless of barrel length. Just don’t breathe on the eyepiece though!<br><br>PETER LABBETT IS NO MORE, BUT HIS WORK LIVES ON: we’re sorry to have to report that British small arms ammunition expert Peter Labbett (73), author of all those very useful, meticulously researched and beautifully illustrated ammunition guides most recently advertised in SADW, died suddenly on 18 February 2002 after giving a presentation at the Imperial War Museum.<br><br>Peter was a long-time subscriber to SADW and we have conveyed our sympathies to his son Paul, who wishes readers to know that Peter’s books &amp; pamphlets are still available &#8211; see the listing at:<br><br>http://www.users.waitrose.com/~paullabbett/<br><br>All these publications are available from Michael Labbett (m.labbett@virgin.net) except in the USA and Canada, where they are only available from Vic Engel (vicengel@chilitech.net). Prices available on application.<br><br>Paul Labbett says his father’s lifelong interest in small arms &amp; ammunition stemmed from being on the wrong end of them as a child besieged in Malta during WW2.<br><br>MOD PATTERN ROOM UPDATE: on 22 Feb 2002 the UK Defence Procurement Agency was one party to a ceremony held at the Royal Armouries in Leeds to mark the transfer there of the UK MOD Pattern Room collection of 14,000 fully-functional military firearms. Legally it transpires that the collection has been ‘gifted’, with Parliamentary approval, to the Armouries, which are part-privately funded, but in practice it is simpler to understand this as a ‘hosting’ arrangement, with the Pattern Room an embedded MOD unit.<br><br>Most of the MOD staff formerly at the Nottingham Pattern Room location have transferred to Leeds, along with the Pattern Room library of weapons documentation, and the arrangements which have applied in the past for private viewings by weapon experts and other professionals will continue. It’s also hoped to eventually display under glass even some of the modern weapons from the MOD collection, and the joint Armouries/Pattern Room inventory will hopefully become a new ‘national firearms collection’.<br><br>Local police are content with the security arrangements at Leeds, and the Royal Armouries also have their own security staff to look after the transferred weapons. However, there are a couple of hitches which mean that things will not be back to normal for some time.<br><br>Currently there is no room for all the Pattern Room guns, and only a portion have so far gone to Leeds. The rest are back in military depots awaiting the construction of a substantial new building at the Leeds location to house them. This is pencilled in for completion in 2005, when the ‘gifting’ process will be completed.<br><br>The Pattern Room collection was begun in 1850, but can trace its origins back to the Modelling Room at the Tower of London, which was also home to the Royal Armouries. It moved from the Tower in the early 19th century. As most readers know, it moved again from the Royal Small Arms Factory (RSAF) at Enfield to Nottingham when Royal Ordnance, under intensive cost pressure on the SA80 contract, closed RSAF and transferred its small arms production to Nottingham, which is now itself about to close.<br><br>At that point, the UK will have no national military small arms plant at all. Currently Heckler &amp; Koch, a Royal Ordnance subsidiary, is being relied upon exclusively by the UK MOD for SA80 upgrading, but H&amp;K is also up for sale. When it eventually comes to replacing SA80, the MOD will either have to buy a foreign weapon off the shelf or a brand new small arms supplier will have to be specially established in the UK, as Diemaco was in Canada to provide that country’s new 5.56mm weapons family.<br><br>Even if a good portion of the Pattern Room collection eventually goes on display, we’re unconvinced that this will greatly increase the number of visitors Leeds receives. The original wheeze of establishing a new Royal Armouries base in Leeds was to relieve pressure on the Tower of London, where only a small part of the historic weaponry could be shown.<br><br>However, Leeds is well off the beaten track for foreign tourists, an expensive train ride north from London and has &#8211; unsurprisingly &#8211; attracted only about a quarter of the numbers originally forecast.<br><br>The government probably thought it was doing regional tourism a big favour, but with hindsight it would have been a much better idea to build a new Armouries facility somewhere in the London area. That way it would have caught a lot of overseas visitors whose itineraries are centred on the capital<br><br>(nb: we were apparently in error in reporting (see previous issues) that the previous custodian of the collection at Nottingham, though now retired, had been retained as a consultant to scope out new acquisitions-Nick)<br><br>(Dan’s Note: I have a major article coming up on the closing of the MOD Pattern Room at Nottingham. The Pattern Room has been invaluable to the small arms community, and in a trickle down effect, to all users of small arms who benefit from the research done there. The SAR Expeditionary Forces have already visited the Royal Armories at Leeds, and will bring that information to the readers as soon as we can)<br><br>CIA &amp; KGB GEAR NOW ON SHOW AT REAGAN LIBRARY: ‘For the first time, the public is getting a large scale view of the CIA’s and KGB’s real-life James Bond gadgets, from a replica of the Russians’ deadly poison-dart umbrella to some of the Amercians’ most ingeniously concealed cameras. The US exhibit includes dozens of items borrowed from a CIA collection in Langley, Virginia, many of them never before shown to the public. They can now be seen at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California.’ (AP, 18 Feb 02).<br><br>Exhibits cover the period from as far back as the War of Independence. The exhibition runs till 14 Jul 2002. No contact data was given, but try: http://www.reagan.utexas.edu<br><br>NEPAL TO TAKE G36 RIFLE &#8211; MAYBE: according to JDW (20 Feb 02) the Nepalese army plans to buy around 65,000 Heckler &amp; Koch 5.56mm G36 rifles for its 45,000 troops (another 10,000 men are planned), with the first 5,000 weapons scheduled for delivery in Feb 2002, the rest over 10 years, mostly at the front end of that period. The Nepalese rifles will reportedly have 1.5x optical sights.<br><br>Weapons to be replaced are AK47s, FN FALs, 7.62mm Galils and some older kit. However, it is not clear, JDW said, whether the sale can actually proceed under German export laws, since Nepal is in the middle of a war of attrition with Maoist rebels. A literal interpretation of the weapons-of-war law would appear to preclude it.<br><br>NO BELTED AMMO DEPLOYED WITH MINIMI FOR AFGHANISTAN: ‘British paratroops sent to Afghanistan were left without ammunition for their most powerful weapon thanks to a bureaucratic cock-up. The soldiers were deprived of the firepower from their machine guns for at least three days. The soldiers from 2 Para, who were sent as the lead elements in the International Security Assistance Force, had to patrol the streets of Kabul with sidearms. The paras are furious that the bungle left them without the use of their Minimi machine guns.’ (Sunday Express, London, 24 Feb 02)<br><br>The Paras had apparently opted to take 5.56mm Minimis to Afghanistan rather than the 7.62mm MAG-58, which was reportedly considered too ‘aggressive’, but the belted ammo &#8211; which is little used by UK forces &#8211; didn’t arrive with them. The comment about sidearms is a little pessimistic though, since patrols still had their SA80s. But the question we really should be asking is how come the wildly-hyped SA80A2 ‘improved’ Light Support Weapon has been sidelined by the Minimi?<br><br>We guess you already know the answer to that one &#8211; it’s a better weapon for the intended job, and doesn’t come with any of the confidence baggage still trailing in SA80’s wake.<br><br>Though we would not wish to use any 5.56mm machine gun for very long in the classic sustained-fire role, due to the rapid barrel wear with this calibre, the Minimi is a very good choice for the ‘machine rifle’ task, and has been used this way a lot by US forces in recent years, with above-average numbers of men in infantry patrols carrying these guns on past overseas missions.vThe British policy which is now evolving, apparently established as a result of experience in Kosovo, seems to be “give the Minimi to those who might be called upon to do some real soldiering and everyone else can have the LSW.” They are reportedly being issued on the exact same scale as the LSW, ie one per infantry fire team (two per squad).<br><br>As increasing evidence of this trend we note that the 1st Bn Royal Anglian Regiment, which is relieving 2 Para in Kabul this month has also acquired Minimis, which troops were zeroing at their Pirbright (Surrey) camp on 7 March. They are the first British line infantry to have this weapon, which hitherto had been issued only to special forces and the Paras, particularly their pathfinder platoon.<br><br>While the official reason for issuing Minimi is to compensate for the shortcomings of the magazine-fed LSW in providing ‘suppressive fire’, this is not a very convincing justification. Magazine-fed LMGs have been used for the past 60 years or more, and were never considered lacking in that department before.<br><br>More VCs have been won by British &amp; Commonwealth troops armed with heavy, slow-firing .303” Bren Guns (with 28-round magazines) than with probably any other weapon. Rapid fire in three to five-round bursts is quite adequate for the job (anything more is ‘sustained fire’, a role for which the Falklands War demonstrated that even the 7.62mm MAG 58 is not sturdy enough).<br><br>The absence of an interchangeable barrel on the SA80 LSW is an obvious downside, but though the Minimi (like the Bren gun) is issued with a second barrel, the empirical evidence suggests that Minimi barrels are rarely changed in practice, so the ‘spare’ simply becomes an added burden for the gunner.<br><br>The irony, of course, is that a Minimi without belted ammo rapidly becomes a magazine-fed weapon just like SA80, but is usually less reliable, since using magazines tends to make the weapon over-function (the reciprocating parts cycle back and forward faster than rounds can be fed), causing feedway jams.<br><br>So, at the bottom line, all the lyrical hype about SA80A2 boils down to is &#8211; well, not a helluva lot. The shift to the Minimi for any serious work frankly says it all. Unfortunately, no-one at the UK MOD has ever had the moral fibre to admit SA80 was a lousy investment and kill the darned thing off for once and for all.<br><br>Instead, what we’ve seen over the years is gradual ‘customer creep’, as first the SAS then others opted for better alternatives, then the 7.62mm L7A1 GPMG was ‘rediscovered’ as a squad LMG in place of the grossly unreliable A1 version of LSW, and now there’s the Minimi &#8211; and an official MOD requirement to purchase a further quantity of belt-fed 5.56mm guns for operational infantry (see other news). Nuff said?<br><br>Royal Ordnance does make 5.56mm belted ammo to special order, but since Minimi ammunition is also packed in special 200-round plastic boxes to hang on the guns, we wonder whether the present stocks might not in fact be coming from abroad. Maybe we need to enquire.<br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Here is a small sampling of a few of the July 2002 SADW articles. You can contact Nick at the email above, and make arrangements with him to obtain the full service sent directly to your email address. In order to receive SADW your e-mail system must be capable of receiving attached files, and the e-mail software system or settings do not reject files as large as 400kb. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE SPOTLIGHT: JULY 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-spotlight-july-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Martin L. Fackler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heckler & Koch Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Jim Schatz, Heckler &#38; Koch, Inc. Puny Bullets by Dr. Martin L. FacklerA Manufacturers Response Dr. Fackler’s assessment and opinion concerning the lethality of small caliber PDW cartridges appeared in the previous issue of “Small Arms Review”. Heckler &#38; Koch was offered the opportunity by SAR to respond to Dr. Fackler’s article. We hope [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Jim Schatz, Heckler &amp; Koch, Inc.</strong><br><br><strong>Puny Bullets by Dr. Martin L. Fackler<br>A Manufacturers Response</strong><br><br>Dr. Fackler’s assessment and opinion concerning the lethality of small caliber PDW cartridges appeared in the previous issue of “Small Arms Review”. Heckler &amp; Koch was offered the opportunity by SAR to respond to Dr. Fackler’s article. We hope our friends at FN will also choose to respond in kind in the interest of dialogue in what many experts believe is the most interesting recent development in small arms; Personal Defense Weapons.<br><br>Dr. Fackler is certainly experienced and well respected in the field of wound ballistics. We are however not aware that Dr. Fackler has actually tested the HK 4.6x30mm cartridge or the weapon itself, yet he is highly critical of the HK 4.6mm round. This is a pitfall that he warns others not to fall into. I am also not aware that Dr. Fackler has officially contacted HK with his concerns previously. We do welcome his expertise to this relatively new area of small arms development and intend to invite him to HK in the very near future for a full briefing on this weapons system.<br><br>Few will argue that these PDW rounds can compare to rifle calibers such as 5.56x45mm and 7.62x51mm or to a lesser degree handgun calibers in the areas of permanent and/or temporary tissue destruction or in muzzle energy. The HK 4.6x30mm cartridge was not designed to replace rifle cartridges. It was intended to replace pistol-caliber weapons, primarily those in caliber 9x19mm Parabellum and to be used for target engagements at realistic PDW ranges, that being less than 100 meters. Understanding the rationale for the development at HK of the 4.6mm round and HK PDW, now type-classified by the German military as the “MP7”, is key to understanding why HK has invested a great deal of our own IR&amp;D funds on this addition to the relatively new category of individual weapons.<br><br>PDW’s actually are not new. The US armed forces have classified the M9 Pistol as a PDW for nearly 20 years since it’s adoption in fact, and still do. The problem with handgun calibers like 9mm Parabellum and .45 ACP and the hugely popular .40 S&amp;W is that they do not defeat (penetrate) modern soft and hard military-issue body armor unless AP projectiles are employed. Handgun ammunition assembled using armor piercing projectiles are not issued to US forces or those of most other nations. AP projectiles also perform poorly against unprotected soft tissue as Dr. Fackler points out and thus are not the best all around choice for all targets. The other major concern with handguns as PDW’s is the low hit probability in the hands of the average user. Handgun marksmanship is difficult to master for many and a perishable skill for all; making hits on target, especially under the stress of an armed encounter under variable lighting conditions, a hard skill to maintain. These two issues are the driving force behind HK’s development of the MP7 and the 4.6mm cartridge and should be kept in mind during the following explanation of HK’s rationale for the design of our PDW “system”.<br><br>Contrary to Dr. Fackler’s claim that we “powerful arms companies with large advertising budgets” are forcing the concept of PDW’s on to the prospective users, this is simply not true in the case of Heckler &amp; Koch. As is so often the case in the small arms community it was the user who petitioned the small arms industry to “push the stick” to address the important though often ignored deficiencies of conventional defensive military weapons. HK began its study on this subject in the early 1990’s in response to the NATO requirement D29 for a new PDW to replace 9x19mm handguns and sub guns. Like the weapons it might one-day replace it was to be lightweight, small and easily portable. Most importantly the new NATO PDW was to have a high degree of hit probability and the means to defeat the NATO CRISAT target, something that pistol-caliber handguns and submachine guns could not and cannot do with standard issue military FMJ ammunition.<br><br>HK began its effort devising a cartridge that would defeat the CRISAT target and yet impart only the absolute minimal amount of recoil to the shooters shoulder. The HK MP7 imparts about one third the recoil impulse of the 9mm Parabellum cartridge to the shooters shoulder when fired from an HK MP5 submachine gun yet it will defeat the current CRISAT target at distances out to and including 200 meters. In 1992 the CRISAT target was revised by the NATO panel from 48 layers of Kevlar to the current configuration, 20 layers of Kevlar covered with 1.6mm titanium plates and the HK PDW cartridge was modified by HK engineers to account for this change. This move was brought on by the proliferation of Soviet SPETsNAZ-style body armor, which has now found its way to most corners of the world into some very shady hands, to include military, para-military and criminal elements of some of the worlds’ most dangerous organizations. HK has thus exceeded the demands of the user and the NATO D29 PDW requirement with this new and continuing development.<br><br>Hit probability is the key to lethality. In the absence of any contact with the intended recipient the most modern high-performance projectile is still 100% ineffective. The NATO PDW is intended to be issued to support personnel primarily who are generally armed with pistol-caliber weapons. Armed with the HK MP7 these personnel can now effectively defend themselves against aggressors wearing modern body armor. Due to it’s low recoil impulse in semi auto fire and associated controllability on full auto fire, the fact that it can be shoulder-fired and has an all-weather day/night reflex sight the HK MP7 is highly effective for the common soldier due to it’s high degree of hit probability under all conditions without special and/or regular refresher training.<br><br>Even novice shooters can easily obtain repeated hits on targets out to 100 meters and beyond with a weapon such as the HK MP7. Given a handgun few could match that performance with any regularity even on targets located at just 25 meters.<br><br>Would all military combatants and law enforcement officers be better off in terms of maximum lethality with rifle-caliber assault rifles? Most definitely but for many reasons of portability, cost and issues of overpenetration an assault rifle or even submachine gun is inappropriate in most of the classic law enforcement and military support roles. The concept of the HK PDW is a weapon that is easily wearable by the user so it is immediately available when called upon, even as the wearer performs his or her normal duties of piloting an aircraft, loading ammunition, operating a radio or directing traffic. One of the most unfortunate aspects of the infamous 1986 Miami FBI shootout was that the FBI agents had available to them MP5 Submachine Guns in the trunks of their cars. However they were not immediately available when the unexpected shooting began. In most cases what the agents used in the firefight was what they were wearing and the handguns proved woefully ineffective against their very determined assailants inside the natural ballistic protection of an automobile, even though a few shots were perfectly placed by the agents with no immedite effect on their eventual assassins.<br><br>Dr. Fackler speaks to great lengths in his article about the use of PDW’s in law enforcement close-quarters combat. While this was not the primary purpose envisioned for the HK PDW a final report from 2001 on testing conducted on a prototype HK PDW and early pre-production ammunition by the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Crane Division for US Army special operations forces concluded that “In a close range defensive (or offensive) engagement it appears that the PDW would be well suited to the use of shoulder mounted automatic burst fire” due to it’s controllability. The report goes on to state that “The PDW’s high rate of fire (950 rpm) combined with an aimed 5-10 round burst would significantly increase the likelihood of rapid incapacitation by increasing the chance for quick Central Nervous System (CSN) disruption”.<br><br>Dr. Fackler also refers numerous times to the lessons learned from the FBI’s tragic “Miami Shootout” and the post shooting Wound Ballistics seminars that concluded that shooting incapacitation results from a hit or hits to the central nervous system (brain, brain stem, spinal cord, etc.) or through blood loss. CSN incapacitation is near instant whereas incapacitation through blood loss, even with the destruction of the heart, can take up to 10 to 15 seconds, 50 seconds in some accounts, until oxygen is depleted from the bloodstream and brain. Permanent tissue destruction causes blood loss. Temporary cavities were deemed too unreliable and unpredictable for immediate incapacitation purposes, particularly those created by pistol-caliber ammunition.<br><br>Heckler &amp; Koch has devised the MP7 to not only be able to penetrate ballistic protection on or around the intended target, such as vests, helmets and vehicle body panels and windshields, but allows the operators to easily hit the target in semi or burst fire with multiple rounds at ranges out to 200 meters. Each projectile has the capacity to both destroy tissue and organs and cause blood loss or to shut down the central nervous system by simple penetration of soft tissue and bone.<br><br>Dr. Fackler too often compares the HK 4.6mm projectile with other calibers that utilize conventional bullet designs. The projectile design of the HK PDW round (all 10 rounds in the 4.6mm ammo “family” in fact) is unique in that it is solid with no conventional core or jacket, similar in construction to proven dangerous game hunting bullets. The ball projectiles are solid steel or copper with an anti-friction coating (molycoat, copper wash). This insures near 100% weight retention of the relatively lightweight projectile which results in increased penetration through the human target. The long blunt tip and length to width ratio of the 4.6mm projectile insures early yawing in the target and the resultant tissue destruction at realistic PDW ranges (&lt; 100 meters) greater than the 9x19mm projectile it was developed to replace. Results of extensive testing by two independent European test facilities confirm the lethality of the 4.6x30mm cartridge.<br><br>Conversely keeping the projectile weight down helps minimize recoil impulse and thus improves hit probability. Using current FBI test protocol the 4.6x30mm steel ball round fully penetrates the CRISAT target at 100 meters and yet penetrates into 20% ordnance gelatin (European standard) more than 6 inches and has more residual muzzle energy than a 124 grain 9mm Parabellum projectile. At 50 meters the 4.6mm steel ball round will penetrate more than 12 inches through an unprotected gelatin block (FBI standards require a minimum of 10-12 inches penetration to be effective, to reach vital organs). The 4.6mm steel ball round still perforates the CRISAT vest at 200 meters or two vests at 50 meters. As a result of the blunt tip the 4.6mm projectile resists deflection when firing against angled windshields and body panels. A special solid copper “Spoon Nose” projectile with angled tip and new “Sky Marshal” and hollow-point “Police” bullets reduce penetration on unprotected targets when overpenetration presents an operational concern around “friendlies” or within sensitive structures and vehicles.<br><br>High velocity rifle cartridges are very destructive. More so than pistol or the newer 4.6mm and 5.7mm PDW rounds. However they cannot be packaged in an easily portable weapon like today’s PDW’s. Even the smallest assault rifles are three times the size and weight of the HK MP7 and due to their 5-10 inch barrels lose a great deal of muzzle velocity and energy anyway while at the same time sharply increasing muzzle blast and flash. Thus in the case of the HK MP7 there is a compromise sought by the developers, one that obviously Dr. Fackler does not agree with. It is clear from his comments that not even the 5.56x45mm NATO (.223 Remington) cartridge is acceptable for law enforcement or CQB use, as quoting Dr. Fackler, “The .223 Remington bullet is prohibited for shooting deer in most states. It lacks the tissue disruption capacity needed to prove reliably lethal on deer (generally man-sized target)”. While maybe not THE most effective deer cartridge in the world the popularity of this round in countless armies and law enforcement organizations across the globe since the 1960’s, and the estimated tens of thousands of humans killed by this cartridge in military and law enforcement shootings, proves that it is a reliable and lethal cartridge against human aggressors.<br><br>Let us not fall into the same trap and limit the R&amp;D into this new and promising category of small arms because of the age old controversies of “9mm vs. .45 ACP” and “5.56mm vs. 7.62mm”. It will be the users who will determine the success, or failure, of today’s modern Personal Defense Weapons like the HK MP7. This being said we also must agree with Dr. Fackler that the manufacturers must design these weapons and cartridges to meet or exceed the user requirements and refrain from promoting the weapon system for more than it is appropriate for. The experienced designers at Heckler &amp; Koch would not be continuing the development of this system if it were not determined through sound calculations and extensive testing that it could perform its true function on the modern battlefield. The concept and development of the 4.6x30mm PDW cartridge originated in the mind of Wolfgang Katzmaier of HK GmbH, a brilliant design engineer with more than 40 years of experience at HK in advanced ballistics, weapon and cartridge design and testing.<br><br>In his article Dr. Fackler seemingly bases his entire assessment of the PDW concept, more specifically the HK MP7 PDW and the 4.6x30mm cartridge, on wound ballistics alone. There are many factors that must be considered, and weighed, when developing or adopting a new weapon/ammunition system. Factors such as weight, size, operator safety, ammunition compatibility, accuracy, reliability, portability and applicability to the mission or user group, etc. must all be considered by the developers. It is shortsighted to rule out a modern tactical tool like a PDW simply using only the area of wound ballistics as a ruler. Had this rationale been employed previously the famed M2HB machine gun might have been deemed “too heavy”, the MK19 “too inherently unsafe for the user”, the M3 Grease gun “to inaccurate” or the current M9 pistol and M16/M4 rifles “not lethal enough”.<br><br>In many ways the current PDW’s like the FN P90 and the HK MP7 are at the zenith of modern weapons design. They are small and highly portable, more so than any other shoulder-fired weapon fielded previously yet they are both lethal and capable of dealing with targets protected by modern body armor. They offer increased hit probability over rifle or pistol-caliber weapons and at greater ranges. In fact the NSWC Crane report on the HK PDW concluded that “The PDW weighs little more than a standard military defensive handgun and may be carried in a leg holster in a similar fashion to a handgun. However, it can be fired from the shoulder and sighted like a rifle providing a significant advantage in speed and range of engagement over an enemy armed only with a handgun and a virtually equal engagement capability (ability to hit) against a typical assault rifle out to 100 meters”. The report goes on to state that the 100-meter accuracy (&lt;4 inches) of the HK PDW rivaled that of a standard M4A1 Carbine. More rounds stowed on board in high-capacity magazines is a standard feature of modern PDW’s while the overall system weight is considerably less, greater than 50% for the HK MP7 compared to the M4 Carbine or HK MP5A3 submachine gun. Most importantly due to the small size and weight of the HK MP7 it can be worn by the user as one would carry a handgun and thus is always immediately available when needed.<br><br>Are there better weapons for other roles? Yes. Are there better weapons for close-in (&lt;100 meters) personal protection of the average user? We do not think so but it is the user, not the industry or academia, that in time will determine that.<br><br>Remember for HK this is a work in progress. The MP7 and 4.6mm ammunition family is still in development, though in the final stages of refinement with series production scheduled to commence in mid-2002. HK is working very closely with the user community, special operations forces, military ordnance facilities, independent test laboratories and ammunition makers to insure that what the user wants is what they receive. From the initial response by the user community to the Heckler &amp; Koch MP7 Personal Defense Weapon system we are convinced that they, unlike Dr. Fackler, look at the PDW from all aspects not just that of wound ballistics. It is fact that these same users are confident that within its intended role the HK MP7 and 4.6x30mm cartridge is lethal enough to get the job done “when the rubber hits the road”.<br><br>We would like to thank Dan Shea and “Small Arms Review” and Dr. Fackler for the opportunity to weigh in on this important if not arguably controversial issue.<br><br>Jim Schatz, Heckler &amp; Koch, Inc.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BACKYARD MORTARMEN</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/backyard-mortarmen/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jody West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M69]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Text &#38; Photos by Jody West My interest with mortars started with a book that my parents gave me when I was 13 years old. It was titled, Up Front with U.S. It was about a 60mm mortar man during WWII. After reading that book I always wanted a 60mm mortar. In early 2000 I [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Text &amp; Photos by <strong>Jody West</strong><br><br>My interest with mortars started with a book that my parents gave me when I was 13 years old. It was titled, Up Front with U.S. It was about a 60mm mortar man during WWII. After reading that book I always wanted a 60mm mortar. In early 2000 I purchased an M2 60mm mortar made by KVS MFG.&amp; ENG. Co. in 1945. I started shooting it in my back yard with reduced loads to launch M69 practice rounds about 50 yards. After getting pretty good at short-range target practice, a friend stopped by for a visit. He had served in Vietnam and he knew what model my mortar was. He showed me how the South Vietnamese used the M2 without the bipod and how they wrapped rope around the barrel because it would get hot after a few rounds. They shot it without sights and according to his accounts, were quite accurate.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="461" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8370" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-16-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Complete subcaliber mortar kit</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>About a week went by and I was thinking about what he had said, and I thought it would be fun to try shooting my mortar this way. So to the back yard I went with my mortar. The first and second rds. I shot landed about were I wanted them. Then came the third round. Of course I was feeling pretty confident until I dropped the round in the barrel and flinched. I watched in slow motion as the round went almost straight up and to the left. If it would have gone to the right it would not have mattered, but to the left was my house, and to make matters worse, my wife was inside. The only positive thing I could think of was that it would not hit the end of the house she was in. It missed the house and I decided shooting mortars in the back yard was a bad idea. However, I now I had the justification to buy something no mortar owner should be without so I could continue shooting safely in the back yard &#8211; a Subcaliber Mortar Trainer Device 3-F-8. This device was developed and procured by the Office of Naval Research Special Devices Center for the National Guard. There were four manufacturers: Folsom Arms (F.A.), Groov-Pin Corp. (G.P.C.), Topping Bros. (T.B.), and Waldes Kohinoor (W.K.). The kit consists of 20 subcaliber projectiles, a subcaliber insert barrel, 3 different barrel spacers,( 60mm, 81mm and a special spring steel adapter spacer is provided so this kit will also fit the larger 4.2 mortars) a pull through cleaning brush, a small cleaning brush and rod, retaining rings, rubber O ring, retaining ring removal tool, breech hole cleaner, hexagonal key and 3 spare fins. This is all contained in an olive drab wooden box. The box is approx. 31in. long by 10.in wide and 4.in. deep. There is a center tray that holds the projectiles and subcaliber barrel. The rest of the kit goes in the bottom of the box. The subcaliber barrel is approx. 26 3/4 long. It has a fixed firing pin in the end cap, which unscrews. The end cap and firing pin go into the base of the unit barrel approximately 4 1/2 inches. There are two 1/2-inch vent holes at the base to vent air out of the bottom of the subcaliber barrel into the mortar tube and out through the holes in the cover adapter when a projectile is dropped in the barrel, so the projectile will hit the firing pin hard enough to fire the primer.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="443" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8371" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-18-300x190.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Top round is a 60mm M69 practice round with 2 boxes of 22 blanks. On bottom are sub-caliber projectiles with bottom one disassembled showing placement of the .22 blanks (at arrows).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="281" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-15.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8374" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-15.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-15-300x120.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Sub caliber barrel with the 60mm inserts installed. Under the yardstick is the pull-through cleaning brush as well as the inserts for the 4.2, the 81mm and 60mm and to their right are three spare tail fins, locking rinks and the hex key.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="461" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-17.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8375" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-17.jpg 461w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-17-198x300.jpg 198w" sizes="(max-width: 461px) 100vw, 461px" /><figcaption><em>The projectile can be seen in flight at the top left of the photo. Notice how Adam keeps his hands away from the barrel when firing.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The projectiles are 6 inches long and 1 inch in diameter. They consist of 8 parts. They are fired with a 22 caliber blank. There are 5 different gas bleed off settings for different ranges. In the nose of the projectile you can place another 22 blank. It has an inertia firing pin so when it hits on the nose it will fire the blank and the blast will vent through 2 holes on opposite sides of the nose. However, the projectile has to hit on a hard surface to fire the blank. The blank that goes into the nose was made by Winchester Arms, stock no. W22 BL. This is a 22 short with a black powder charge made for spotting. Winchester also made the original 22. cal. launching blanks, they came in a white box approx. 1 1/2 by 1 3/4 in. The box is marked “40 Propellants Sub Caliber Mortar Trainer Device 3-F-8” (I have 1 box marked 3-F-8A-1 I do not know if there is any difference). I use CCI 22 short blanks (Be very careful with using blanks that are more powerful. I had aprojectile blow up in the barrel). I use the smallest gas port, it launches it about 25 yards. If yougo any further it is easy to lose them, and it is quicker for the kids to run out and retrieve them if they are closer in. In the manual it states this device may be used on ranges up to 150 feet in Armories or Outdoors. When using you occasionally have a dud round. I have found it is easier to remove the subcaliber barrel and unscrew the end cap and the projectile is usually right there. Always keep the tube pointed in a safe direction, don’t get yourself or your hand in front of it, and observe safe timing of about 60 seconds after a “dud” round before you remove it. If you unhitch the barrel from the base plate to dump it out, it usually will not come out. In order to help prevent duds you have to clean the inside of the projectile base where the firing pin slides inside, as well as the outside of the chamberwhere the 22 blank goes after every shot. In order to stop damage to the nose chamber of the projectile you should keep a 22 snap cap in it while in use or the inertia firing pin will hit on the edge of the chamber damaging the chamber. Plus that will help keep dirt out of the unit. The manual I have was made in September 1953. These training kits are getting very rare and are usually not complete. So if you are lucky enough to own one be careful when used, you probably will not be able to find any spare parts. If you treat it with respect, you will have years of fun ahead of you.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="646" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8377" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-10.jpg 646w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-10-277x300.jpg 277w" sizes="(max-width: 646px) 100vw, 646px" /><figcaption><em>Metal I.D. Tag on box.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMPARISON OF HANDGUN MOUNTED TACTICAL LIGHTS</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/comparison-of-handgun-mounted-tactical-lights/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Products Marketing Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLOCK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insight Technology Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Layman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Devices Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiteTek Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyman Products Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mag Instruments Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick2See]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streamlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surefire LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TACM III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Brinkmann Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Surefire Millennium on Glock Model 17 By John Layman The house is pitch black and your spouse is shaking you out of a deep sleep. She (or he) says there was a loud noise downstairs. A look at the clock tells you it’s just after 2 a.m. You rub the sleep out of your eyes [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-small-font-size"><em>Surefire Millennium on Glock Model 17</em></p>



<p>By <strong>John Layman</strong><br><br><em>The house is pitch black and your spouse is shaking you out of a deep sleep. She (or he) says there was a loud noise downstairs. A look at the clock tells you it’s just after 2 a.m. You rub the sleep out of your eyes and sit quietly listening. The creak in the second stair on the way up to the bedrooms sounds off and you’re wide-awake. Grabbing your pistol from the bedside table, you head for the hall looking like an unlikely storm trooper in your briefs. The “intruder” could be one of the kids or it could be somebody you weren’t expecting. Would a little light help right about now?</em><br><br>There are two general categories of people who purchase handgun-mounted lights: the homeowner protecting self and family, and the law enforcement or military professional. Each of these has a different application and a different set of needs. Let’s look at these needs before we compare the available lighting systems.<br><br>The law enforcement or military professional is faced with numerous situations. Not being one of these, your author has a hard time putting himself in those shoes. One thing is sure; the professional will have encounters where extra light will assure improved assessment. Another certainty, pointing the muzzle of a weapon at someone for identification and assessment is almost always unacceptable. A gun-mounted light is not a substitute for a quality hand-held flashlight. Each individual will have to decide if one more piece of equipment, no matter how useful, is worth carrying around.<br><br>For the professional, a handgun-mounted light has to be sturdy, reliable, and bright. Part of being reliable is being sure the light doesn’t come on by accident in your holster and run down the batteries. Longer battery life and batteries that are readily available and economical is a plus. The weight of a light will have an impact on your shooting and on the burden of carrying it around with you.<br><br>The homeowner will be using the lighted handgun to identify threats at night at fairly short ranges. For the homeowner, a reliable, moderately bright light with shorter range and battery life may be an acceptable solution.<br><br>For all applications, the quality of the light beam is important. Black shadows in the light beam make identification that much harder. It may also be desirable to detach the light during daylight use. Intermittent operation allows better use of the batteries, prevents a threat from zeroing in on you, and allows you to apply light to the situation only when needed. The factors that will be important when selecting a handgun-mounted light are:<br><br>* Brightness,<br>* Beam quality,<br>* Weight<br>* Sturdy construction / reliability<br>     o Materials of Construction<br>     o Durability of Construction<br>     o Disable Switch<br>* Battery life<br>* Interference with Pistol Operation<br>* Intermittent On/Off Availability<br>* Continuous On/Off Availability<br>* Cost to purchase<br>* Cost and availability of batteries<br>* Ease of operation<br>* Ability to detach the light easily<br><br>These factors will affect each individual’s choice differently based on budget and needs.<br><br>There are numerous manufacturers advertising handgun-mounted lights. In addition, there are mounting systems that hold a number of different common lights. The lights that were tested are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Each light was mounted and subject to at least 50 rounds on the range. Every light on the tables operated through the live fire test without failure.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="475" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8382" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-19.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-19-300x204.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Insight Technology M-4 on S&amp;W Sigma</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The brightness numbers shown are from a light meter and are not in any standard unit. They serve to compare the lights to each other. The brightest lights are absolutely blinding. The least bright lights still put a lot of light in a dark room. For comparison, the Maglite 4 D-Cell light has a reading of 41 on the scale used. Also, a Maglite 2 AA has a reading of 29. Brightness readings were taken at the center of the beam with the light focused to its optimum.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="568" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8385" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-18.jpg 568w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-18-243x300.jpg 243w" sizes="(max-width: 568px) 100vw, 568px" /></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="487" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8386" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-11-300x209.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="682" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8389" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-6.jpg 682w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-6-292x300.jpg 292w" sizes="(max-width: 682px) 100vw, 682px" /></figure></div>



<p>There are a number of mounts made for a wide variety of handguns that hold commonly available flashlights. The mounts allow the gun owner to pick between a light made specifically for handguns and lights that may fill in for that purpose. Table 3 shows you available mounts and their characteristics.<br><br>Each gun owner will need to decide if a handgun-mounted light is warranted and, if so, which one will best fit his or her needs. A study of the tables will give you a good picture of what is available for your gun. There are a few combinations and a few pieces of equipment that worked especially well that I should point out.<br><br>To provide intermittent operations, a paddle switch is commonly used. Being able to position the paddle switch where it fits best allows you to adjust the light to your needs rather than change your grip to suit a light. The WLS 2000 by Lyman Products and the LAS/TAC by Laser Devices have large paddle switches that were easily repositioned and took moderate pressure to actuate. Both of these lights worked well overall.<br><br>For an overall tough light, the Surefire Millennium is made for combat. It is machined of aluminum, nicely finished and extremely solid. If you want something you could rely on after a parachute jump, this would be the thing. However, at 10.1 ounces with batteries, it’s also the heaviest light on the list. Its $480 retail price may be out of some people’s range. The LAS/TAC is also machined of aluminum. It weighs only 6.8 ounces and is less than half the price. The LAS/TAC has the disadvantage that it isn’t easily detachable. Either choice will really light up a room.<br><br>The TACM III by Diamond Products and M.U.E.L by Quick2See are made of delrin. This is a space age synthetic material that is known as one of the toughest available. Both of these products are extremely bright and well made. They are designed to mount on the magazine using a quick-detachable mount.<br><br>For the low cost end, a magazine-mounted one-inch light would fill the need for most of us. There are a lot of choices of mounts and lights. The Handgun Kits made by Quick-2-See and Laser Devices are especially solid and versatile. They come off the same patent and are almost indistinguishable. They come with two magazine attachments and one flashlight attachment. The two parts clip together and are quickly and easily separated. The Lyman Products Corporation SideClip Mount fits all flashlights tested. Because the mounting retainers are made of plastic, the mount needs to be held in place by griping the light during fire. Once I figured out how, it worked fine.<br><br>The 1 inch diameter lights tested include Laser Devices’ TL-2; Surefire Z2 &amp; Z3; Streamlight Scorpion; and TACM-III. With a spacer made of rubber and secured by contact cement, it is possible to mount the Maglite MiniMag AA or the Brinkmann Legend into any of the mounts. There are a couple commercially available bushings for this purpose. They are made of hard plastic or nylon and didn’t hold the light well during the live fire tests. It’s possible that some glue would solve that problem, but I liked using rubber (old inner tube) . The success of the smaller lights despite not having a shock isolated bulb may be due to the shock insulation provided by the rubber.</p>



<p>As noted in the table, Brinkmann makes the NexStar xenon replacement bulb that fits the Maglite AA. With this bulb, the light output increases significantly. I enjoy having these in all my Maglite AA flashlights.<br><br>Once you decide that a handgun-mounted light is something you need, handle a few before making your choice. The market is changing quickly and you may find some new choices. The contact information for the manufacturers is below.<br><br><strong>Glock, Inc. USA, Canada</strong><br>Dept. SAR<br>6000 Highlands Parkway<br>Smyrna, GA 30082<br>Ph (770) 432-1202<br>Fax (770) 433-8719<br><a href="https://us.glock.com/en" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.glock.com/</a><br><br><strong>Lyman Products Corporation</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="484" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8387" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-7-300x207.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Lyman Products WLS 2000 in their Side Clip Light Mount.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>475 Smith Street<br>Middletown, CT 06457<br>Ph (800) 22-LYMAN<br>Fax (860) 632-1699<br>orders@lymanproducts.com<br><a href="http://www.lymanproducts.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.lymanproducts.com/</a><br><br><strong>Diamond Products Marketing, Inc.</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="544" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8393" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-5-300x233.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Diamond Products TACM III</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>2300 Commerce Park Drive<br>Woodlake Commerce Center, #6<br>Palm Bay, FL 32905-2619<br>Ph (321) 726-0644 or (800) 530-0644<br>Fax (321) 726-0645<br>tacm3@aol.com or info@tacm3.com<br>http://www.tacm3.com/<br><br><strong>Laser Devices, Inc.</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="356" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8388" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-6-300x153.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>LAS/TAC from Laser Devices</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>Sales and Marketing Department<br>2 Harris Court, Suite A-4<br>Monterey, California 93940<br>http://www.laserdevices.com/<br>Ph (831) 373-0701 or (800) 235-2162<br>Fax (831) 373-0903<br>sales@laserdevices.com.<br>http://www.laserdevices.com<br><br><strong>Streamlight®, Inc.</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="503" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8392" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-3-300x216.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Streamlight Scorpion in Glock factory mount</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>1030 W. Germantown Pike<br>Norristown, Pa. 19403<br>Ph (800) 523-7488 or (610) 631-0600<br>Fax (800) 220-7007 or (610) 631-0712<br>cs@streamlight.com<br><a href="http://www.streamlight.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.streamlight.com/</a><br><br><strong>Insight Technology Incorporated</strong><br>Dept. SAR<br>3 Technology Drive<br>Londonderry, NH 03053<br>Ph (877) 744-4802 or (603) 626-4800<br>Fax (603) 647-7234<br>service@insight-tek.com<br>http://www.insightlights.com/<br><br><strong>LiteTek, Inc.</strong><br>Dept. SAR<br>P.O. Box 245<br>Medway, MA 02053-0245<br>Phone (508) 533-0203<br>Fax (801) 457-9907<br>customerservice@litetek.com or service@litetek.com<br>http://www.litetek.com/<br><br><strong>Quick2See</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="530" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8391" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-4-300x227.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Quick2See M.U.E.L. on Quick-2-See Handgun Kit</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>20472-A Chartwell Center Drive<br>Cornelius NC, 28036<br>Ph (704) 895-8649<br>Fax (704) 895-8619<br>http://www.quik2see.com/<br></p>



<p><strong>SureFire LLC</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="544" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8390" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-3-300x233.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Surefire Z3 on Glock factory mount</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>18300 Mount Baldy Circle<br>Fountain Valley, CA 92708<br>Ph (800) 828-8809<br>Fax (714) 545-9537<br>helpyou@surefire.com<br><a href="http://www.surefire.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.surefire.com/</a><br><br><strong>Mag Instruments Inc.</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="527" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8384" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-16-300x226.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Maglight 2AA in Glock factory mount using a pressure switch end cap by Lyman Products.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Dept. SAR<br>1721 East Locust Street &#8211; 51453<br>Ontario, CA 91761-7769<br>Ph (909) 947-1006<br>Fax (909) 947-3116<br>http://www.maglight.com/<br><br><strong>The Brinkmann Corporation</strong><br>Dept. SAR<br>4215 McEwen Road<br>Dallas, TX 75244<br>Ph 800-527-0717<br>bbock@dallasmfgco.com<br>http://www.thebrinkmanncorp.com/</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MUSSEE NATIONAL D’HISTORE MILITARE IN DIEKIRCH LUXEMBOURG</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/mussee-national-dhistore-militare-in-diekirch-luxembourg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernie Breighner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flakvierling 38]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-55]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ma Deuce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mussee National D’Histore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quad .50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Bernie Breighner One of the most unique military history museums is located in a small town that found itself between the advancing allied army and German troops defending the homeland. The museum is the Mussee National D’Histore Militare in Diekirch, Luxembourg. The town of Diekirch is located approximately 35 km north of Luxembourg City. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Bernie Breighner</strong><br><br><em>One of the most unique military history museums is located in a small town that found itself between the advancing allied army and German troops defending the homeland. The museum is the Mussee National D’Histore Militare in Diekirch, Luxembourg. The town of Diekirch is located approximately 35 km north of Luxembourg City. The unimposing exterior of the museum belies the military treasures that are contained inside. The museum is mostly dedicated to World War II and specifically the battles that were fought in the winter of 1944/45. The museum also serves as the military history museum of the country Luxemburg from the early 1900’s to the present. The museum is home to one of the most dramatic and complete collections of World War II small arms and equipment.</em></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="461" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-17.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8399" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-17.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-17-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A Quad .50 antiaircraft gun.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The museum’s collection was initially obtained from battlefield pick-ups after World War Two. A small group of local residents formed an organization dedicated to preserving the history of battles that were fought in the area. This group eventually became the Diekirch Historical Society. The museum was opened to the public in September 1984 to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the liberation of Luxembourg and the Battle of the Bulge. The museum’s building was a former beer brewery and has over 2200 meters of display area.<br><br>The main display area contains a small assortment of tanks, large caliber weapons, wheeled and tracked vehicles of both German and American origin. All of the display vehicles have been restored with attention to detail and authenticity. On the German side there is a 2 cm (20mm) four barreled Flakviering German anti aircraft gun in perfect condition. Next to the Flakviering there is a Jagdpanzer model 38(t). An American M-3A1 Halftrack sits in one corner bristling with two 1919A-4 machine guns on flex mounts and a M-2 “ Ma Deuce’ on the ring turret. Of particular interest was a mint condition M-55 Quad .50 Caliber Anti Aircraft trailer being towed by a 3/4 ton Dodge 4&#215;4. The M-55 sported a red and white shark’s mouth on the front shroud, most assuredly a GI field modification. One very interesting exhibit in the main hall was on the German V-3 program.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="461" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-20.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8400" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-20.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-20-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Rear of the Quad .50 Antiaircraft gun.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The V-3 was designed to be part of Hitler’s V- Series of weapons. There has been very little written on the existence or the operational use of the V-3. According to the documents located at the museum, The German V-3 was a high-pressure rail gun. The weapon system was to be deployed along steep hillsides where circular sections of tubing would be assembled to make an extremely long barrel. Once the V-3 was constructed on incline it would be an immobile weapon. The overall length would vary due to site conditions and the barrel length could be several hundred feet long. The V-3 would be able to fire a small caliber projectile over great distances. According to the display, there was at least one known attack using the V-3. The attack was only mildly successful and minimal damage was done. The program never really got out of its experimental stage as the war ended. The American army captured the only known prototype. The V-3 was sent to Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland for test and evaluation. The V-3 was presumably tested and the weapon was destroyed. Interestingly, Dr. Gerald Bull revived this concept as he designed several rail guns in the 1960’s for the US Army and was in the process of building the “Super Gun” for the Iraqi’s in the late 1980’s before the project was discovered by British authorities.<br><br>As you leave the main display area you are face to face with three German Volksgrenadiers in full battle dress. The soldiers represent some of the units that took part in the German offensive in the Ardennes. All are wearing authentic German World War II issue clothing ranging from snow parkas to camouflage smocks. One of the soldiers is armed with a Russian PPSh 41, another has an MP 44 and the last has a G-43 with a grenade launcher. This display is only the beginning of what will become a seemingly endless display of weapons and equipment and life-size dioramas depicting troops engaged in battle.<br><br>One of the first stops is the weapons collection room. As you enter, the archway over the door has the rusted relics of an M-1 rifle, Kar 43 and an MP-44 standing guard over the collection. Once inside you are overwhelmed by the enormous collection of weapons, ammo and armaments that are on display. The first case contains a complete assortment of German weapons used in WW II. There are three variations of the German Strumgeweher. The MP-43, MP-43-1 and the MP-44 with accessories such as the magazine loading tool and MP 44 leather magazine pouches. A Third Production model FG-42 (G) in excellent condition is also on display. The collection includes virtually all of the German sub machine guns used in WW II. The examples include the MP 38, MP 40, Erma EMP, Austrian made Steyr Solothurn MP 34(O) model, Bergman MP 35 and a Schmeisser MP28II. Italian submachine guns are present in a Beretta Model 38A and a Beretta Model 38/42 that was favored by some German units. The museum unfortunately did not have examples of the German STEN copy, the MP 3008 or the very crudely manufactured Erma EMP 44. German battle rifles include most variations of the Geweher 98, 98A and 98K in both standard and sniper variants. The semi automatic Kar 43 and G43 sniper variant as well as the G 41 are present. The best part of this display is the assortment and variations of German machine guns.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-17.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8401" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-17.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-17-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>MG42 in the weapons display room.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Literally every square inch on the bottom of the display case is occupied by a machine gun or associated accessories. A well worn MG 08 and its cousin the MG 08/15 are present. Several MG 34’s and the revolutionary MG 42 machine guns are on display. As you go through the museum there are probably at least 10 more examples of each the MG 34/MG 42. A Czech ZB -30 that does not have German acceptance markings fills the front of the case. The ZB-30 does have a rather unusual feature, the magazine of the weapon has two magazines seam welded together to increase capacity. The ZB-30 was known in German nomenclature as the Maschinengeweher (30) t and was the only true light machine used by the Germans during the war. Another weapon of Czech origin is the ZB 37 (Model 37) Heavy Machine Gun in 7.92mm. The ZB 37 was used mostly as vehicle armament due to its size and weight. Other captured/nationalized non-German manufactured weapons include the French model 1924 M29 Chatterrault, an 8mm Madsen 08 as well as the Austrian Schwarzlose. A rare weapon in the case was a German Rhienmetall MG 131/13 in 13mm that was used in aircraft and pressed into service as a ground machine gun late in the war. The MG 13 and MG 15 are also present; both are outfitted with bipods and stocks for use as a ground machine gun. A twin MG 81 machine gun designed for the Luftwaffe to protect bombers from attacking fighters is hidden among the machine guns lining the floor. The MG 81, a modified MG 34 adopted for the air role is not complete as it is missing the front spider site. The main differences between the MG 81 and MG 34 was that the MG 81 was capable of automatic fire only and had a higher rate of fire. The rate of fire for the MG 81 is between 1000-2000 rounds per minute (RPM) compared to 800-900 RPM for the MG 34. Almost unnoticed are a collection of pistols ranging from P-08 Lugers, Broomhandles, P-38’s, Polish Radom, various CZ pistols and a Browning High Power. A German designed Model 39 Grenade Launcher in 30 mm is displayed along with an assortment of 30-mm grenades designed for its use. Some of the interesting weapons were ones that had been captured in previous battles and were pressed into service late into the war. The museum has on display several Soviet PPSh 41 that were converted to fire 9mm. The conversion involved replacing the barrel with one chambered for 9mm, modifying the magazine well to accept MP 38/40 magazines and reworking the bolt assembly. Another is the Tokarev M 1940 semi automatic rifle.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="461" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8403" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-19.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-19-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>German Volksgrenadier troops armed with Kar 43 and Mp 44.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="461" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8404" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-12-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>German troops at a command post.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="464" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8405" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-8.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-8-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>German troops at a meal wagon. Soldier cleaning MG34.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The museum has a very impressive display of German anti tank weapons. The massive Mauser designed 13 mm Model 1918 “TankGewher” anti tank rifle with a variety of rounds. This rifle is an upscale copy of the Mauser Gewher 98 bolt action rifle that has a weight of 38 pounds. The cartridge was first developed during World War One as a direct result of the introduction of Tanks into the modern battlefield. The 13mm round, which has an actual diameter of 12.7 mm was capable of penetrating 1/2 inch of armor. John M. Browning used this round as a prototype in developing the .50 BMG cartridge that is the worldwide standard today. One of the most amazing sites was seeing factory new boxes containing Model 30 Panzerfausts. Both models of the Panzerfaust, the Model 30 and the Model 30 Klein (small) are displayed in their original German shipping crates. The room has an extensive display of German mines designed for anti personnel and anti tank uses. The entire ordinance collection was liberated after the war by the original members. Even more incredible was that the members deactivated almost all of the ordinance on display. They eventually sought the help of the Luxembourg Military EOD experts. As one views this vast assortment of small arms used by the Germans in WW II, it illustrates the difficult task of trying to supply all of the various caliber’s of ammunition and spare parts needed to keep these weapons working under combat conditions<br><br>This concept is easily visualized as you look at the case containing American small arms of WW II. The US collection takes only one quarter of the space as the German collection! The display includes the 1903 Springfield, M-1917 Enfield, M-1 Garand, M-1 carbine and the M1A1 carbine folding stock version. The M 3 and M3A1 sub machine guns, Thompson M1 A1 are represented as well as the Browning 1918 A-2. The case has 3 Browning M-2 Heavy machine guns on display. One is an aircraft version AN M-2 and the other two are ground versions on M 63 tripods. The Browning 1919A-4 and 1919A-6 are also included. The rest of the room has a tremendous collection of ordnance ranging from the 9mm Luger cartridge to a 500 pound US General Purpose Bomb. The room could be a reference library for any EOD team working with WW II ordinance.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8406" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-7-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>German MG42 Machine Gun nest.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8407" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-7-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>US Troops at a night river crossing.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8408" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-6-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>US Troops dragging an aluminum boat for river crossing.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>After leaving the weapons collection room, the museum journey will now take you through snap shots of the war in the winter of 1944/45. These snap shots are in the form of life sized dioramas depicting soldiers at war. The largest of these displays depicts elements of the Fifth US Army making a night crossing of the river Sauer into Germany on January 18,1945. The Platoon sized scene has US soldiers dragging aluminum boats in deep snow to the river’s edge. The depiction puts you at the rear of the column as they advance into a dark snowy horizon. Each of the soldiers are wearing white snow smocks and are carrying a variety of weapons from the Browning 1919A-4 to the M-1 Rifle. Nothing has been left to imagination. The scene has been recreated to give the viewer a very accurate depiction of the event.<br><br>Another scene shows tired German troops settling down to an evening meal. A German meal wagon is providing the troops with hot food. The troops are huddled along the sides of a destroyed building, trying to find a warm and comfortable spot. One soldier who stands only feet away from the edge of the display is cleaning an MG 34. The soldier has broken down the weapon on a table and is busily cleaning the receiver in his hand. The scene has amazing detail from the German mailbag to the spilled food down the side of the meal wagon. Several other scenes depict a German MG 42 machine gun nest, a US mortar crew using a building as firing position, German PAK 40 cannon with crew and German 8 cm mortar crew. One diorama has a German communication NCO maintaining listening watch inside of a farmhouse serving as a command post. Several German soldiers have sought refuge in the house. Inside the house there are fine examples of the MP 44 series and the MG 42. At each display there are literally hundreds of artifacts that have been assembled to provide realism and authenticity.<br><br>Some of the more interesting exhibits include a bicycle that has been modified to carry two Model 30 Panzerfaust. The bike has a specially made bracket that fits over the front tire that allows the two Panzerfaust to be cradled on either side. Another is a rusted out Browning AN M2 aircraft machine gun that is hanging on a hallway that was found in a farmers field years later. If you look closely into the action you can see a rusted link and .50 shell still inside. There are so many details that have been included to create realism. If you look into the chamber of a Thompson M-1 being held by a serviceman accepting the surrender of a German, it holds a .45 ACP round.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8409" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-5-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Part of the ordnance collection in the weapons display room.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="465" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8410" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-4-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Display of German Machine Guns.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8411" width="580" height="385" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-4-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px" /><figcaption><em>An MG34 in the weapons display room.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>s you travel through the museum’s passageways, you are constantly presented with a balanced perspective of the war. The goal of the museum is to provide an objective historical view from all parties that were involved. Some of the most visually moving parts of the museum are located on the stairwells and small spaces along the walls. The museum has obtained uncensored pictures depicting the aftermath of battle from both sides. These scenes of death and destruction complete the picture of what it was like to be in combat in the Ardennes.<br><br>The museum has the top two floors dedicated to the Luxembourg Military. These displays are virtually a history of military firearms from the Maxim to the M-60. Some of the more notable firearms was a 4” barreled P14 or P-17 and an even shorter barreled Mauser 98K that was used by the resistance forces against the Germans occupiers. One display depicts an M-40 recoilless cannon mounted on the back of a US jeep. Other displays depict a US made 105 Howitzer and gun crew and a TOW launcher and crew waiting in a snowstorm for their next prey. There is a display of modern weapons including MAG 58, Dutch service FN FAL, UZI fixed and folding stock models, French GIAT MAS and a British L1 A1. A very nice Bren CDN that was manufactured for the Chinese in 7.92mm by Ingliss of Canada is included in a display of Korean War weapons. There are several Lewis guns presented; one is the WW I Lewis in .303 British and the other is a Lewis K machine gun from WW II in .303. The Luxembourg Military component is small compared to its European neighbors, but the displays paint a proud and active role in worldwide operations.<br><br>This museum is small in size, but has one of the best collections of military weapons. What really sets this museum apart are the numerous dioramas depicting soldiers at war. These displays are the heart of the collection and every effort has been made to keep them authentic and historically accurate. The town of Diekirch is an approximately 3-hour drive from Frankfurt, Germany. The address 10 Balmeral Rue, Diekirch, Luxembourg. The museum is open daily from 1000-1800 April 1 to Nov 1 and from 1400-1800 from November 2 to March 31. The website address is www.luxembourg.co.uk/NMMH/.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="465" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8412" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-3.jpg 465w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-3-199x300.jpg 199w" sizes="(max-width: 465px) 100vw, 465px" /><figcaption><em>A German 8cm mortar with crew.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="495" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8413" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-3.jpg 495w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-3-212x300.jpg 212w" sizes="(max-width: 495px) 100vw, 495px" /><figcaption><em>A 4 barreled German 20mm Flakvierling 38.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOCTOR GATLING’S ENDURING LEGACY</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/doctor-gatlings-enduring-legacy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st Lieutenant John H. Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonel George M. Chinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatlings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAU-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Benjamin “Beast” Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goalkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jet Age Gatlings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M61]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Gun Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warthog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert Bruce Above: This informal portrait of a Gatling crew during the Philippine Insurrection provides a good look at the standard box magazine, an inefficient device that was eventually replaced by the Accles drum. Credit: US Army Signal Corps/National Archives “The object of this invention is to obtain a simple, compact, durable, and efficient [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Robert Bruce</strong><br><br><strong>Above: This informal portrait of a Gatling crew during the Philippine Insurrection provides a good look at the standard box magazine, an inefficient device that was eventually replaced by the Accles drum. Credit: US Army Signal Corps/National Archives</strong><br><br><em>“The object of this invention is to obtain a simple, compact, durable, and efficient firearm for war purposes, to be used either in attack or defense, one that is light when compared with ordinary field-artillery, that is easily transported, that may be rapidly fired, and that can be operated by few men.”</em> &#8211; Gatling Revolving Battery Gun Patent Application, granted 14 Nov 1862</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="461" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8417" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-21-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Fort Bragg, NC, Summer 1982. The M167 towed air defense gun is a radar-aimed 20mm M61 Vulcan on a trailer mount as used by the 82nd Airborne Division. It can fire bursts of 10, 30 or 60 rounds at either 1000 or 3000 rounds per minute. <strong>Credit: Robert Bruce</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>While John M. Browning’s .50 caliber M2HB machine gun has the distinction of the longest continuous service of any weapon in the US Armed Forces, Doctor Richard Jordan Gatling’s revolving guns stand out as the oldest type currently in use. Characterized by multiple barrels spun by external power, modern Gatlings from .223 caliber to 30 millimeter serve around the world on land, sea and air, unmatched for their combination of extreme reliability with astonishingly high rates of fire.<br><br><strong>Vulcans, Warthogs and Goalkeepers</strong><br><br>Now built by General Electric on a novel operating principle dating back more than a century to the American Civil War, some of the best known of today’s Gatling-type weapons include the diminutive 5.56mm Six-Pak (Experimental only), the incomparable 7.62mm Minigun as first used on “Puff the Magic Dragon” flying gunships in Vietnam (Now manufactured by Dillon Aero), the 20mm Vulcan aircraft and air defense gun, and the formidable 30mm GAU-8 in tank-busting A-10 Warthog fanjets.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="511" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8418" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-18-300x219.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Goalkeeper sales brochure. The 30mm GAU-8 has significantly longer range and stopping power over the 20mm Phalanx system.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>US Navy warships are protected from sea-skimming Exocet-type guided missiles by the GE/Signaal Goalkeeper (now known as the Phalanx) that can send out a radar-guided stream of 30mm lead at the incredible rate of over 4000 rounds per minute.<br><br>Remarkably, many military armaments specialists say that no other conventional ammunition bullet-hose on the horizon seems likely to replace the Gatlings’ deadly efficiency anytime soon. As a result, it may not be absurd to expect this archaic instrument to still be going strong on the 200th anniversary of its patent!<br><br><strong>Yankees and Indians</strong><br><br>Dr. Gatling himself, a North Carolinian who studied but never practiced medicine, inexplicably turned against his Southern brethren when he sold his first hand-cranked Revolving Battery Gun in 1862 to Abraham Lincoln’s Navy for testing. Oddly (and we Rebels take some comfort in this), by the end of the War of Northern Aggression the Federals had bought only about a dozen more despite favorable test results and vigorous efforts by the good doctor and his influential friends and financial backers.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="237" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-20.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8419" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-20.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-20-300x102.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A full-scale mockup of the General Electric GAU-8 30mm cannon next to a Volkswagen dramatizes the size of the gun system which provides a major increase in firepower of the A-10 Close Support aircraft. </em><br><em><strong>Credit: Fairchild Republic Co.</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>While some are reported to have been used by the notorious General Benjamin “Beast” Butler against Confederates in the horribly inhumane siege of Petersburg, Virginia, the guns were mostly said to be not much more than an amusing novelty and no effective tactical employment resulted.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="469" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8420" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-13.jpg 469w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-13-201x300.jpg 201w" sizes="(max-width: 469px) 100vw, 469px" /><figcaption><em>An 1893 photo portrait of Dr. Richard Jordan Gatling with the little Model 1893 “Bulldog” version of his remarkable gun, chambered for the .45/70 Government cartridge. </em><br><em><strong>Credit: US Naval Historical Center</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Despite what should have been obvious potential for battlefield efficiency and mechanical reliability thanks to newly developed metallic cartridges, Gatling’s “bullet organ” apparently failed to impress Union generals in the field or the War Department in Washington. Undaunted, Gatling managed shortly after the war’s end to sell about 115 of the improved .58 caliber and one inch (25mm) Model of 1865 guns for use on the American frontier. The Army was in a tight spot and needed these to protect intrusive forts and illegal settlements on the sovereign real estate of Native Americans (insensitively called “Red Indians” at the time) who were understandably upset with the Euro-imperialists for overrunning their ancestral homeland.<br><br>Curiously, reliable reports of actual combat use of Gatlings out West are virtually non-existent and they are perhaps most famous for their absence at the massacre of General George Armstrong Custer’s 7th Cavalry at the Little Big Horn in 1876. Not wanting his column slowed down by the somewhat cumbersome horse-drawn guns, Custer chose to leave all four behind. The rest, as they say, is history.<br><br><strong>Machine Gun Parker</strong><br><br>Although neglected and even disdained by senior military leaders at the time, at least one junior officer kept Gatling’s rotating machine rifle alive. 1st Lieutenant John H. Parker made such a nuisance of himself in pressing his Army superiors for consideration of his ideas on tactical employment that he soon earned the derisive nickname of “Machine Gun Parker.”<br><br>However, the young lieutenant soon got the last laugh in the most famous engagement of the Spanish-American War when he superbly positioned his section of five .30 caliber Gatlings in support of Teddy Roosevelt’s assault of San Juan Hill. Spraying the forward slope with an almost continuous torrent of lethal lead raindrops, Parker’s Gatlings helped keep the well-dug-in enemy from effectively firing on the attacking Rough Riders. This victory — heralded in banner headlines around the world — vindicated the persistent Parker and finally bestowed battle honors on the long-suffering doctor’s invention.<br><br>Alas, the “automatic machine gun” (operating on the power of each cartridge fired) invented by Hiram Stevens Maxim, was to capitalize on the Army’s new found interest in the combat utility of rapid fire rifle caliber weaponry. The old fashioned, hand-cranked Gatlings were relegated to defense of stateside forts and were finally declared obsolete at the end of WWI, falling into nearly total obscurity for decades.<br><br><strong>Electric Power</strong><br><br>In an interesting aside to the historical record it should be noted that the indefatigable Doctor Gatling had conclusively demonstrated the astonishing firepower potential of his device in 1890 by rigging it with one of Mr. Edison’s newfangled electric motors. It reportedly fired at the amazing rate of 1500 rpm, with subsequent tests yielding bursts of up to 3000 rpm. Problem was, nobody at the time really needed this costly and dizzying volume of fire so the experiment soon faded away. Ah, but things change&#8230;.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="472" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8421" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-9.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-9-300x202.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The 30mm General Electric GAU-8 is an externally powered seven-barrel Gatling weapon designed for optimum combination of size, weight, drive power and rate of fire required for the A-10 “Warthog.” </em><br><em><strong>Credit: GE/Fairchild</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Jet Age Gatlings</strong><br><br>Introduced toward the end of WWII, Germany’s fast and nimble jet-powered fighters made propeller driven combat aircraft obsolete virtually overnight. The incredible speed of America’s postwar jets far exceeded the capabilities of existing conventional machine guns and auto cannon, limiting their effectiveness in dogfights and strafing runs. Most simply put, even when the fastest firing single barrel guns were crowded into multiple mounts, they just couldn’t put out enough lead in the fleeting seconds of target exposure. What to do?<br><br>As luck would have it, somebody in the program remembered Gatling’s electric motor experiments more than a half-century before. By 1950, the General Electric company was well along in development of what was soon to become colorfully known as the VULCAN, a 20mm revolving cannon capable of firing bursts at 100 rounds per second!<br><br>Officially adopted in 1956 as the M61 Automatic Gun, the Vulcan was first installed in the F-104 Starfighter and went on to distinguished service in many other airframes. It also found enthusiastic acceptance as a radar-aimed anti-aircraft gun and rides in many different helicopters as primary armament and smaller versions in flexible door mounts. Various models in a range of calibers and applications carry inspiring names like Avenger, Equalizer and Phalanx in American and allied service worldwide.<br><br>Colonel George M. Chinn, perhaps the free world’s most respected authority on automatic gun systems, gives this product of the good doctor’s inventive genius a ringing accolade in the last of his monumental five-volume series THE MACHINE GUN:<br><br>“Surely Richard J. Gatling deserves the first and foremost acclamations for his insight of modern military weapon needs when he nurtured his famous invention with conceptual and persevering skills so that twentieth century man could take his gifts and build on them as has been done in the defense of our grateful country and of our friends throughout these last forty years.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="531" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8422" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-8.jpg 531w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-8-228x300.jpg 228w" sizes="(max-width: 531px) 100vw, 531px" /><figcaption><em>The business end of this A-10 Close Support aircraft with its awesome 30mm GAU-8 Gatling gun, firing depleted-uranium ammunition to kill enemy tanks. <br><strong>Credit: Fairchild Republic Co.</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Primary Reference Sources</strong><br><br>THE MACHINE GUN, By Chinn, US Navy, 1951<br>THE GATLING GUN, By Wahl and Toppell, Arco 1965<br>THE GATLING GUN, By Joseph Berk, Paladin 1991</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE 2001 HIRAM MAXIM MACHINE GUN SHOOT &#038; EXPO</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-2001-hiram-maxim-machine-gun-shoot-expo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Bubba"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma-Gees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIRAM MAXIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff W. Zimba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type 92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Jeff W. Zimba Billed as the Hiram Maxim Millennium Machine Gun Shoot, the 2001 event in the town of Dover-Foxcroft Maine was the largest event yet. Emma-Gees from all corners of the Country as well as places all over the world filtered into the tiny community for the annual shoot on July 20th &#8211; [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Jeff W. Zimba</strong><br><br><em>Billed as the Hiram Maxim Millennium Machine Gun Shoot, the 2001 event in the town of Dover-Foxcroft Maine was the largest event yet. Emma-Gees from all corners of the Country as well as places all over the world filtered into the tiny community for the annual shoot on July 20th &#8211; 22nd 2001.</em><br><br>Once again, I had the pleasure of running “The Tower” overlooking an ensemble of some of the best and most professional class three shooters in the entire country. For any of you who have never attended this shoot let me describe the scene. The firing line is approximately 250 feet in length and filled with every type of belt-fed machine gun imaginable. A walk along the HMHS firing line can produce well over 100 years of firearms history and innovation. One position may have a Maxim MG08 on a sled mount slowly churning out old 8mm casings, while four positions away an M249 is spreading 5.56 NATO brass towards the ground. It is pretty tough to attend an event such as this and not find yourself becoming a historian of some sort.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="532" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8428" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-18.jpg 532w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-18-228x300.jpg 228w" sizes="(max-width: 532px) 100vw, 532px" /><figcaption><em>A-Gunner Jim Demaree helps feed a Browning 1919.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The diversity of the firing line is certainly not limited to the age of firearm designs. Imagine an American 180 tearing at the backstop with a virtual hailstorm of .22lr at over 2000 rounds per minute, and a quad .50 just a few positions away opening up with all four barrels. If that is still not enough lead going in one direction at once, it should be known that the line is usually opened with a volley of artillery fire from a US-M1 57mm piece. If a six-pound projectile traveling at approximately the same speed as an average 30-06 doesn’t get your interest than this probably isn’t the place for you.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="649" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-22.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8429" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-22.jpg 649w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-22-278x300.jpg 278w" sizes="(max-width: 649px) 100vw, 649px" /><figcaption><em>The GSI Crew with their awesome Quad .50 was the center of attention at the 2001 shoot.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The firing line is between 100 and 150 yards from the point of impact. The impact area is packed with automobiles whose better years are long forgotten as well as an occasional appliance or bathroom accessory. Oh yeah, there is some dynamite there too. Lots of dynamite! Much to the pleasure of the substantial crowd of both shooters and spectators the explosives are not spared and are usually placed on the heavy side. This takes time to do correctly and safely as several safety sweeps take place in the impact area during the day. From my vantage point on the tower I am often asked what is going on downrange and when the line will open up again. When I relay it is the dynamite crew checking for unexpanded ordnance and placing fresh charges you can almost hear the smiles coming on.<br><br>There is absolutely nothing to prepare a shooting enthusiast who spends an occasional weekend at the local range and suddenly walks into the world of a well-organized national level event such as this. It is a complete overload for the senses. The sounds are very different from those encountered during a regular day on the range. If you are used to having four or five pals with you at the range or in the local gravel pit it will sound like silence compared to 62 roaring belt-fed machine guns all belted up and shooting in unison during the opening “mad minute” of each volley. If you bring out an occasional reactive target or two when you usually meet at the range, you will be eternally spoiled by the rapid explosions of 60% nitro sticks being impacted by the bullets of the shooters. When the first few rounds hit their mark and the thunderous percussion waves over the crowd it is a certain bulls-eye with everyone there. The percussion is so intense that it often sets off the car alarms of those new to the shoot. Those who have “been there and done that” know better than to arm their alarm if parked anywhere in close proximity to the line.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="643" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8430" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-19.jpg 643w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-19-276x300.jpg 276w" sizes="(max-width: 643px) 100vw, 643px" /><figcaption><em>Mark Heitz helps a youngster fire a belt at the 2001 shoot.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>If you like the smell of gunpowder your nose is in for a sensation like nothing ever imagined. Over 32,000 rounds per minute will be going downrange at the opening of the volley and that produces a gunpowder smell like nothing else.<br><br>The sights of the occasional flame-thrower firing between volleys are extremely visually stimulating. The fire is bright and intense. The smoke is dark and thick. Above everything else, they throw a lot of heat. It is quite amazing to be standing 50 yards from this device pointed in the opposite direction, and still be able to feel the tremendous heat on your skin.<br><br>If being up close and personal on the line is more than you can stand for long periods you can spend some time browsing in the dealer tents. There you will find the people who make these shoots their business and supply the shooters and collectors with their prized possessions and the ammo to feed them. Many of these folks travel all around the country to shoots and shows, and bring a lot of inventory and experience with them. It is not uncommon to find nationally recognized authors doing research, selling their books or just relaxing and enjoying the company of fellow shooters here either. It is a family atmosphere and is well attended by many families.<br><br><strong>The Hundred Mom Marchers draw attention to the shoot.</strong><br><br>All in all, the 2001 shoot was business as usual with the exception of some unexpected helpers bringing a flurry of media coverage to the event just as it was getting underway. It seems that the local chapter of the so-called Million Mom March (now officially affiliated with Sarah Brady’s Brady Campaign) had issued a press release asking people not to attend the function, claiming it “&#8230;.sent the wrong message to children.” When the associated press picked up on this, phones started ringing. The anti-gun group was so concerned that they never contacted anyone connected with the shoot and it looked like they were just trying to earn a little free publicity from the high profile of the annual event. It was reported by a local newspaper that their spokeswomen made a statement claiming that the so called “Million Moms” were going to protest the event but “felt threatened” and did not do so. The boogeyman of scary black guns raises his head again.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="468" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8431" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-21-300x201.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>“<strong>Bubba</strong>” Naess firing a Japanese Type 92 Machine Gun.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>What a joke. If they had voiced an interest to anyone actually connected with the event they would have been given a booth just to let them see their misconceptions were wrong. All in all we don’t know if they damaged the attendance of the event, but we do know they caused things to be a little more hectic for the organizers than they needed to be at the time.<br><br><strong>Shoot 2002</strong><br><br>The dates for the 2002 shoot are July 19, 20 &amp; 21. The place is the same as it has been since 1996. Take I-95 North to exit 39 (Newport Exit) and take Rt. 7 North to Dover-Foxcroft. The signs will bring you to the shoot. Admission is $6.00 per day for adults and $4.00 per day for children. Children must be under immediate adult supervision at all times. Shooter passes are $30.00 per day or $45.00 for the weekend. You can reach the club at (207) 465-2336 or on the web at www.hirammaxim.com. If you have a little vacation time you can use this summer, think about taking a trip to “Vacationland” the third weekend in July and visiting some of the best friends you have yet to meet. See you at the shoot!</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="439" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-14.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8432" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-14.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-14-300x188.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Some of the targets after the shoot.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
