<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>V5N9 (Jun 2002) &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/category/articles/articles-by-issue-articles/v5/v5n9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SITREP: JUNE 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/sitrep-june-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITREP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Dan Shea In the fervor of patriotism that we have been seeing over the last eight months or so, I have noted a couple of things- expected them, but disturbing nonetheless. One of these is how many people are “Hiding Behind the Flag”- I mean advertisements that have nothing to do with patriotism, or [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Dan Shea</strong><br><br>In the fervor of patriotism that we have been seeing over the last eight months or so, I have noted a couple of things- expected them, but disturbing nonetheless. One of these is how many people are “Hiding Behind the Flag”- I mean advertisements that have nothing to do with patriotism, or military obligations, or actually anything at all to do with America and her trials. Car ads caught me the other day. Selling cars has little to do with protecting our country, unless you want to take the unlikely tangent that if it helps the economy, it is patriotic. Hell, buy a machine gun or a suppressor if you want to help the economy. Exercising your Second Amendment Rights has got to be more patriotic than buying a new Honda.<br><br>Politicians are doing that as well. Same old baloney being foisted off on the public as “being patriotic”, and just about every day some windbag is blustering about “How dare someone question my patriotism”, just because he isn’t on the same page as today’s version of the Hawks might be. Remember half of these people are communist sympathizers from way back, and generally hate traditional America unless it’s election time. Hypocrisy abounds in politics. Someone ought to be questioning the “Patriotism” of politicians who go contrary to the Constitution.<br><br>Funny thing. There are a lot of Americans, of all races, creeds and colors, who are serving or have served in our armed forces. Most of the people had a quiet commitment to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. These are the guys and gals from small towns and big cities, from rich and from poor and just plain middle class. In the eyes of the bean counters who are advertising for new personnel they may be kids looking for a way to work through college, or a challenge to find themselves, or perhaps starting over after things didn’t work out in civilian life. That isn’t all there is to it. Service requires commitment.<br><br>I was remembering some conversations in Basic Combat Training many years ago. Just a bunch of guys- kids really, I was seventeen and most were under twenty years old. In the quiet moments where people had stopped trying to show how tough they were, or we weren’t being herded and rushed around, there would be conversations. I remember quite clearly one young man who wasn’t particularly smart- he was actually kind of the dimmest bulb on the chandelier to be honest- the kind of kid the smart jet setters mock, the one that Hollywood leaves as driftwood on the beach. I was struck by his simple ideas of patriotism. His father had served in WWII. Everyone in his family had served. That is kind of like my family, by the way, all the way back to WWI.<br><br>There weren’t a bunch of heroes in his family. No Medal of Honor holders, no huge war stories that he passed on to us. He simply stated that it was his dues to be in the Army for three years, then he would have paid for living here and could get on with his life. He wanted to do this. He was serving because it was the right thing to do.<br><br>I don’t know where he went or ended up. Can’t even remember his name. But, I have to tell you, in the time I served, I met countless people just like him. That is who is there in our service, that is who will be out in front or back in support. People who serve because it is the dues for living here. This is not to judge those who didn’t or couldn’t serve- it is just a reminder that when you hear politicians tell you what the patriotic thing to do is, or the car sellers, or whoever has an agenda&#8230;. That the Americans who did wear, or are wearing the uniform are patriots by action.<br><br>They don’t need to buy a new car to prove it.<br><br>&#8211; Dan</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>INDUSTRY NEWS: JUNE 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/industry-news-june-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert M.Hausman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert M. Hausman Industry Making Progress At U.N. While the news coming from the United Nations in recent times has not been good concerning firearms ownership, an association of the world’s leading firearms companies and shooting groups is getting close to being officially recognized by the United Nations as a “non-governmental organization” (NGO). Status [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Robert M. Hausman</strong><br><br><strong>Industry Making Progress At U.N.</strong><br><br>While the news coming from the United Nations in recent times has not been good concerning firearms ownership, an association of the world’s leading firearms companies and shooting groups is getting close to being officially recognized by the United Nations as a “non-governmental organization” (NGO). Status as an NGO would allow the association more active involvement and to be more effective in countering the global gun ban zealots at the world body.<br><br>The World Forum on the Future of Sport Shooting Activities, comprised of major European arms producers, leading American gun manufacturers, as well as organizations such as the Sporting Arms &amp; Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute, the National Rifle Association and foreign shooters’ organizations, are seeking NGO status to allow attendance and participation at UN firearms meetings. At a recent gathering of the UN’s NGO Committee in New York, the gun group was recommended for NGO listing. There was no dissent among the 19 countries sitting on the committee. Final approval could come this summer when the UN’s Economic and Social Council meets to consider the recommendation.<br><br>Over the last several years, the UN has become increasingly involved in issues dealing with the manufacturing, marketing, distribution and ownership of firearms. Two countries, Canada and Japan, have been leading efforts to severely curtail the legitimate international firearms trade.<br><br><strong>U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Gun Rights Restoration Appeal</strong><br><br>In what could be a major decision for firearms civil rights activists, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether federal courts can restore convicted felons’ right to possess a firearm, even though the government has stopped considering such requests. The Bush Administration is appealing a lower court ruling in favor of a licensed firearms retailer from Texas who was convicted in Mexico of unlawfully importing ammunition.<br><br>The appeals court said the man, through a “simple oversight,” failed to remove the ammunition from his vehicle before going into Mexico for dinner. U.S. federal law bars anyone convicted of a felony (meaning a serious crime) in “any court” from possessing firearms (regardless of whether or not the offense involved violence). The law allows affected persons to ask federal officials to lift the ban for their individual circumstances, and federal courts can review a denial. Since 1992, Congress has barred the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco &amp; Firearms from spending money to consider restoring firearms rights on grounds it could result in a risk to public safety.<br><br>“A district court does not have authority to assume the responsibility that Congress removed from ATF,” the Justice Dept. said in court filings. The appeals court ruling “threatens to create the very dangers to public safety that Congress sought to avoid.”<br><br><strong>Case Background</strong><br><br>Thomas Lamar Bean attended a gun show in Laredo, Texas in 1998. One evening, he and three assistants decided to go into Mexico for dinner. He said he directed his assistants to remove all firearms and ammunition from his vehicle. Nonetheless, a box of ammunition was left in plain view. At the border, Mexican customs officers saw the box and Bean was later convicted in Mexico of a felony charge of unlawfully importing ammunition. After spending several months in a Mexican prison, he was transferred to a U.S. prison and later released.<br><br>In 1999, Bean asked ATF to restore his right to own firearms so he could resume his business. After ATF said it was barred from acting on his request, he went to a federal judge in Beaumont, Texas, who granted it. Federal courts can restore the right to possess firearms after ATF fails to act on the request, the judge said. The New Orleans-based 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last June, saying it would be an “injustice” for Bean to lose his livelihood due to the conviction.<br><br>The Justice Dept.’s appeal to the Supreme Court said district courts “are no more able than ATF to protect the public from the risks” of restoring gun rights. Five other federal appeals courts have disagreed with the 5th Circuit, according to government lawyers. Bean’s lawyers argued that Congress “did not take any direct step to preclude judicial review” in such cases.<br><br>The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the term beginning next October and will likely issue a decision by June 2003. The case is U.S. v. Bean, 01-704.<br><br>The anti-gun Violence Policy Center has jumped on the case, hailing the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case as it says it could put an end to the gun rights restoration program officially known as “relief from disability.” The group claims that research it conducted in 1991 led to the Congressional funding prohibition.<br><br>The VPC says it worked with anti-gun members of Congress to shut the program down through the appropriations process. “It was and still remains the clear, unequivocal intent of Congress that the ‘guns-for-felons’ program cease operation altogether,” said VPC spokesperson Kristen Rand. The VPC plans to submit a friend-of-the-court brief to the Supreme Court.<br><br>In its research, VPC said it investigated 100 case files obtained from ATF and issued a report, Putting Guns Into Criminals’ Hands. It claims that of those granted relief from 1985 to 1992, 69 were subsequently re-arrested for crimes that included: attempted murder, first degree sexual assault, abduction/kidnapping, child molestation, illegal possession of a machine gun, trafficking in narcotics, and illegal firearms possession or carrying. However, the VPC may have hand-picked the files it chose to review to produce a desired negative result of the program. Between 1985 and 1992, it says the relief from disability program cost taxpayers $21 million.<br><br><strong>New Multiple-Threat Body Armor</strong><br><br>Moving to company news, a new body armor system called Kevlar MTP (Multiple Threat Protection) providing protection against both bullets and knives has been developed by Dupont Kevlar Life Protection.<br><br>The Kevlar MTP vests are said to be much lighter, concealable and flexible than the vests made of ceramic or metallic material designed for knife protection previously. Vests using Kevlar MTP technology are expected to be the first flexible body armor system to pass both the National Institute of Justice stab (knife class) and bullet standards.<br><br>A federal lawsuit was recently filed by Second Chance Body Armor, Inc. against First Choice Armor &amp; Equipment, Inc. of Brockton, MA. The suit alleges patent and trademark infringement, particularly regarding First Choice’s Millennium Flex 2000 vests. The suit also alleges that First Choice’s millennium Tri-Flex product infringes on Second Chance’s Tri-Flex trademark, creates market confusion between the two products and constitutes unfair competition.<br><br>Armor Holdings, Inc., has acquired substantially all of the assets of Identicator, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of paper-based fingerprint identification products. Armor holdings paid $5.4 million, primarily in common stock by issuing 214,880 shares to the seller. Identicator had $3.2 million in revenue for the fiscal year which ended March 31, 2001 and about $2 million net cash on its balance sheet at closing.<br><br>The Identicator brand name is thought to be a good complement to Armor holdings’ existing NIK and Lightning Powder brands in the forensics product category.<br><br>SSK Industries of Wintersville, Ohio has developed a conversion of the AR-10™ Match grade rifle to operate with the highly efficient and accurate 300 Winchester Short Magnum cartridge. “After conducting comprehensive testing, we’ve conclued this combination of rifle and cartridge seem made for each other,” said J.D. Jones, SSK’s president. “Use of the 300 WSM in the AR-10™ increases velocity and energy, as well as flattening the trajectory a significant amount over the 308 Winchester cartridge. This is ‘the’ semi-auto rifle for the long-range shooter. Functioning of the Winchester ammunition in the AR-10™ is flawless and accuracy is usually under 1 MOA with factory ammunition, with some groups going one half of one MOA.”<br><br>Units for the 270 and 7mm will be developed as factory ammunition becomes available. Other calibers based on the .308 Winchester case are also available, as is the .338 Whisper®.<br><br>Doskocil Manufacturing Co., Inc., marketer of Gun Guard products and other firearms accessories, says it has reached agreement with its bondholders to significantly reduce its outstanding debt. The transaction, completed in late December, reduced the firm’s debt from $176 million to $58 million. Doskocil now operates as a private company. Doskocil’s holders of 10 1/8% notes due in 2007 voted unanimously to exchange debt for minority ownership in the company. The agreement also provided for the majority owner, Westar Capital, to make an additional investment in the company.<br><br>“We are now focused on accelerated investments in new products with more than 40 significantly redesigned or totally new products being introduced this year,” said Larry Rembold, the firm’s president and ceo.<br><br><strong>S&amp;W’s Sales Up</strong><br><br>The proud old firm of Smith &amp; Wesson is making a comeback with its new American ownership. The gunmaker has posted a whopping 77% increase in sales during its second fiscal quarter. The total S&amp;W sales of $19.9 million during the quarter ended Oct. 31, was 77% more than the first quarter’s total of $11.2 million. Operating income came to $261,087 in the second quarter, compared to a $3.5 million loss in the first quarter.<br><br>S&amp;W’s president, Bob Scott, said, “It is important to note our monthly sales and earnings have gone up consistently since our acquisition. As we enter our 150th year, we are confident we will see the continuation of the current positive trend in both sales of our products and corporate profitability,” Scott added. The company was acquired in May 2001 by Saf-T-Hammer Corp.<br><br>Analysts believe S&amp;W is benefiting from a combination of the increased interest in acquiring self-defense products by the public which began last fall, and the changeover to becoming an American-owned, rather than a British-owned, company.<br><br>A spokesperson for noted gunmaker, Heckler &amp; Koch has confirmed rumor that the German gunmaker is for sale and that negotiations with a British buyer are in the due diligence stage.<br><br>The Israeli Defense Force is testing a new military rifle that may replace the M-16. Called the Tavor, it is manufactured by TAAS-Israel Industries. The IDF is also testing the American-made M-4 rifle. If the Tavor is selected, TAAS will probably produce the arm under license in the U.S.<br><br>The Tavor is similar in design to the British Enfield FA80, with the magazine inserted behind the grip into the butt. This allows for the arm to be shorter in length, while retaining a long barrel. The Tavor is largely composed of plastic components.<br><br>Winchester Ammunition is recalling one lot of Super-X Drylock Super Steel Shotshells after discovering the shells could contain the wrong propellant. The only lot number affected is 49X3SG29. Coupons are being issued for replacement of the shells to affected purchasers.<br><br>Kimber Manufacturing unveiled a dozen new models of 1911-style pistols at the 2002 S.H.O.T. Show. These include a double stack family of 10-shot polymer frame models. Two single stack models are now available in .38 Super. A complete line of Eclipse pistols was unveiled and a Custom Shop model for Limited Ten competiton is in the works.<br><br><strong>FBI Loses H&amp;K Subgun</strong><br><br>Three FBI firearms &#8211; a 10mm Heckler &amp; Koch submachine gun, a .40 caliber Glock pistol, and a Remington 12-gauge shotgun, left in plain view in an FBI agent’s parked car in New York City, were recently stolen. The guns, along with a laptop computer, a digital camera and an FBI parking sticker, were stolen in the borough of Queens from a car parked overnight.<br><br>The unmarked FBI vehicle was vandalized after agent Jennifer Bleier parked at 121st Street and 22nd Avenue in College Point. Bleier returned to the car the next morning and found the front window broken. The shotgun and submachine gun were taken from a rack mounted on the front seat of the vehicle which was visible from the street.<br><br>The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, the tax exempt arm of the former Handgun Control, Inc. group, was recently given $500,000 in gift donations. The funds came from the family of hardware businessman John Hechinger, Sr. and the late Washington Post political cartoonist Herbert Block (Herblock).<br><br>Michael Barnes, president of the Brady Center, said the Hechinger gift was intended to be used to establish and train a national network of volunteer speakers &#8211; including college students- who will “educate” their communities about the threat of gun violence and how it can be reduced through “gun safety” laws.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMALL ARMS DATA BY WIRE (SADW): JUNE 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-june-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Here is a small sampling of a few of the July 2002 SADW articles. You can contact Nick at the email above, and make arrangements with him to obtain the full service sent directly to your email address. In order to receive SADW your e-mail system must be capable of receiving attached files, and the e-mail software system or settings do not reject files as large as 400kb. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br>NEW-BUILD ‘ENFIELD NO 4’ ACTION RIFLES FROM AUSTRALIA: AIA Corporation in Brisbane (Australia) is making milled new-build Enfield No 4-pattern commercial rifle receivers able to accept a range of calibres (7.62mm NATO, 5.56mm and 7.62x39mm) and magazines, including (as appropriate) M14, M16 and Kalashnikov types, all modified (for the US market only) to hold no more than ten rounds. Calibre changes are effected by replacing the bolt-head, which (unlike the military bolt) has a recessed face &amp; integral ejector. There are some other design differences in the commercial receiver; for example there is an AK-style magazine release and scopes will be easier to mount, since receivers are ready-tapped to accept an optional Picatinny rail. The AIA actions have been incorporated into a range of new-build No 4-based rifles which may ultimately range from No 5 Jungle Carbines to L42A1 sniper rifle lookalikes. No multi-calibre kits will be offered, however.<br><br>Barrels are attached using a locking ring system similar to that employed by Savage, and both bores and chambers are chrome-lined. Stocks, which are made in SE Asia, come in premium teak as standard, with walnut a special-order option. Iron sights comprise a twin-aperture (100 &amp; 300 metre) rearsight and fully-adjustable front post within a new type of sight protector.<br><br>Likely Australian prices as at August 2001, when we first became aware of the project on a visit to Brisbane but were asked to sit on it for a while, ranged from around A$800 for a carbine, presumably more for other versions (we have no idea what the 2002 US prices will be). Back then fifty pre-production rifles were just about due for testing; 7.62x39mm prototypes were spot ted back in early Nov 2001.<br><br>At the 2002 SHOT Show, five models and all the three calibres mentioned above were being promoted, with a variety of stockwork styles, including No 5, No 8, No 4 and sporter configurations, and barrel lengths from 16.1” (short carbine) to 25.2” (the No 4 lookalike), some with flash hiders.<br><br>There is still a great deal of affection for the No 4 Enfield in the UK and the English-speaking Commonwealth countries, so we imagine this project could attract quite a lot of interest. We’re sure there will also be quite a few collectors in the US who will be falling over themselves to get one, though only the military-look clones will attract the real purists.<br><br>Australian contact tel (+61)7-3366-5172, fax 7661, e-mail: linz@gil.com.au Point of Contact: Mr Evan Ham, AIA MD. US agent is Tristar Sporting Arms Ltd, Tel (816) 421-1400, Fax 421-4182.<br><br>FURTHER FNMI M240B MACHINE GUN ORDER: ‘FN Manufacturing Inc., of Columbia, S.C., was awarded a delivery order amount of $19,365,000 as part of a firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery-indefinite-quantity contract for 2,582 M240B Machine Guns. Work will be performed in Columbia, S.C., and is expected to be completed by Feb. 28, 2004. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Bids were solicited on the World-Wide Web on March 8, 2001, and two bids were received. The Tank and Automotive Command, Rock Island, Ill., is the contracting activity (DAAE20-01-D-0065)’ (US DoD contracts, 5 Feb 02).<br><br>The M240B is the latest bipod-mounted American-built version of the US army’s M240 (FN MAG-58), with a new heat-shielded handguard covering the barrel between the carrying handle and just shy of the gas block, making it a bit more like the late-model M60 (which it replaces), plus an optical sight rail on the feed cover. It’s claimed to have a ‘mean rounds between failure’ rate of 26,000 rounds&#8230;&#8230;.but not, we assume, in continuous fire!<br><br>FRENCH EXPERIENCE A CLUE TO GULF SYNDROME?: ‘French forces who served in the Gulf war were not given the vaccines and anti-biological warfare measures administered to UK and US veterans and are free from the illnesses that beset their allies, the US Congress has been told&#8230;..The French were issued with protective suits and not given the cocktail of drugs that British and US servicemen took. Only 140 of the 25,000 French Gulf veterans have reported illnesses related to Gulf war service, compared with more than 5,000 of the 52,000 British troops deployed, and 137,862 of the 697,000 US service personnel. The French also made no use of organophosphorous pesticides&#8230;..and used bottled water, unlike US and UK forces.’ (Guardian, UK, 12 Feb 02)<br><br>SEMTEX NATIONALISED: Time magazine (4 Feb 02) noted that Explosia, the aptly-named Czech firm that makes Semtex (the terrorists’ favourite plastic, responsible, inter alia, for the Lockerbie blast) and other explosives, was to be taken into state ownership in mid-2002 by the Czech government, which considers it needs to control production of these strategic materials (see footnote below).<br><br>Explosia’s owners Aliachem are apparently quite happy with the idea, and they should be &#8211; the sale price is said to be one Czech crown (three US cents), plus a whopping $19.4 million to restructure Explosia’s debt. Some deal, huh? By the way, some readers may know Explosia better by its previous monniker of Synthesia. Czech reloading propellants from Synthesia have in the past been sold on the US sporting market, for example by Scot Powders.<br><br>(footnote: a Telegraph (UK) story on 8 Feb 2002 said a leaked Czech intelligence report claimed that Czech troops &amp; counter-terrorist police had been stealing Semtex and detonators from army depots for sale to gangsters, and that at least 260 pounds of the stuff was missing, though possibly much more)<br><br>KABUL FIREARMS BLITZ: ‘Afghan police Tuesday launched a wide security sweep of the capital, seizing illegal weapons and ordering drivers to remove tinted film from vehicle windows. Authorities set up road blocks throughout Kabul, searching vehicles for guns and other weapons and bringing traffic to a standstill in some parts. A statement broadcast by Afghan Radio said all firearm owners had to declare their weapons and get permission to carry them.’ (Reuters, Kabul, via New York Times, 29 Jan 02).<br><br>Ermm&#8230;..this is really goin’ to work. Anyway, what’s an ‘illegal weapon’, in the Afghan context? Probably an unloaded one. Anyway, no Afghan male worth his salt is ever going to ask anyone for permission to go armed. Mr Karzai needs to get out more.<br><br>1689 &#8211; LEST WE FORGET: by way of reminder, the following selected clauses are taken from the statement of principles known as the 1689 English Bill of Rights, which has never been repealed:-<br><br>&#8211; That the subjects which are protestants, may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by law.<br><br>&#8211; That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.<br><br>&#8211; That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials of high treason ought to be freeholders.<br><br>&#8211; That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction, are illegal and void.<br><br>US POSSE COMITATUS ACT (1878): ‘Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.’<br><br>This law is a general prohibition which prevents all the US regular armed forces (except reservists and (in peacetime) the US Coast Guard) participating in domestic law enforcement within US boundaries.<br><br>It does not affect the National Guard when operating under the control of state governors (eg for disaster relief), but it does apply to Guardsmen if they’re under federal control &#8211; which raises some interesting questions about the use of the National Guard in anything but a decorative role at US airports, eg who are they actually working for?</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE SPOTLIGHT: JUNE 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-spotlight-june-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin L. Fackler MD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Martin L. Fackler, MD From time to time, SAR receives a no holds barred, against the grain editorial, and we have finally found the correct forum for this-”The Spotlight”. Herewith, we present the opening salvo from Dr. Martin Fackler, the president of the International Wound Ballistics Association. Dr. Fackler’s credentials are impeccable in his [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Martin L. Fackler, MD</strong><br><br><em>From time to time, SAR receives a no holds barred, against the grain editorial, and we have finally found the correct forum for this-”The Spotlight”. Herewith, we present the opening salvo from Dr. Martin Fackler, the president of the International Wound Ballistics Association. Dr. Fackler’s credentials are impeccable in his field, and he raises some concerns here that are of great interest to our readers. We are prepared to present opposing or supportive views in the next issue of SAR. Be sure not to miss this controversy as it unfolds- the newest and most innovative small arms on the scene come under professional scrutiny, and we are witness to this debate- Dan</em><br><br>Manufacturers apparently understand that it is easy to sell people on ideas they want to believe. “Personal Defense Weapons” (PDWs) are cute. They are very lightweight, no strain to carry, and have essentially no recoil to contend with. They are fun to shoot. Only the most firearms illiterate, however, could believe that the bullets fired by these weapons could provide reliable protection against a 250-pound armed and raging felon.<br><br>My experience as a wound ballistics researcher and consultant for more than two decades has led me to the unfortunate conclusion that very few of those who would be expected to understand wound ballistics actually have an adequate grasp of the subject. My experience, of the past decade, with the PDW problem strongly reinforces that conclusion.<br><br>The history of firearms development has been blemished repeatedly by ordnance engineers designing ineffective weapons, which got their users killed. Bullet developers are usually adept at internal and external ballistics, as well as at that part of terminal ballistics dealing with penetration of hard targets such as armor. Unfortunately, wound ballistics, the study of bullet effects on the living body, including causes of lethality and the immediacy of incapacitation, has never been their strong point. When the new smaller-caliber, higher-velocity bullets made possible by the hard-metal-jacketing of lead cores were introduced on the battlefields of the world, it took the sacrifice of soldiers to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of these bullets in stopping the aggression of their adversaries. In India, in 1895, and in Somaliland, in 1903, countless British infantrymen were chopped up or speared because their nondeforming bullets had little effect on charging and determined tribesmen. US Armed Forces suffered from the same lack of bullet effectiveness in the Spanish-American war.<br><br>One would think that ordnance engineers would have learned, from the historical record, that bullet effectiveness cannot be determined from bullet velocity alone. Yet again, three-quarters of a century later, we had to sacrifice two FBI agents killed and five seriously wounded, in the “Miami Shootout” of 1986, to prove to ordnance engineers that they needed help from persons trained in wound ballistics to determine the effect of various bullets on the living human body.<br><br>The foregoing might not be too surprising, considering that wound ballistics didn’t develop into an authentic science until the 1980s. Now, however, we have a tissue simulant that has been calibrated against living tissue and a method for reproducing and illustrating a bullet’s disruption pattern — the wound profile. Law enforcement organizations serious about determining the best bullets to protect their officers (FBI, RCMP, CHP, LAPD, etc.), as well as major American bullet manufacturers, have been using 10% ordnance gelatin to test bullets for the past decade. As a result, law enforcement officers are currently being furnished the most effective handgun bullets ever developed. The velocity of the overwhelming majority of these bullets is subsonic &#8211; considerably lower than the velocity of law enforcement bullets in the 1970s. We should not, therefore, have to relearn, one more time, the same painful historical lesson about the inefficiency of excessive bullet velocity. But alas, the PDWs are now being thrust upon us. With them emerges, anew, the inadequate bullet problem. This time we have the scientific methods to avoid disaster without having to sacrifice the military or police personnel that exposing inadequate bullets has cost us in the past. It appears, however, that science, common sense, and experience are being pushed aside by powerful arms companies with large advertising budgets.<br><br>About 1989, Fabrique Nationale Herstal (FN) introduced the first version of their P90. Apparently occupied with developing this weapon, FN failed to notice that, simultaneously with the P90’s development, major wound ballistics errors of the past were being corrected. That was a colossal stroke of bad luck for them. Just as it had been shown (valid and reproducible bullet testing, analysis of the FBI’s “Miami Shootout,” etc.) that increasing a handgun bullet’s velocity by lessening its weight decreases its potential to incapacitate the human target, FN introduced a very lightweight bullet at a higher-than-usual velocity.<br><br>The first FN 5.7&#215;28 mm P90 bullet weighed 23 grains and was 2.4 cm (0.94 inches) long. Knowledgeable readers will readily recognize that a .22 caliber bullet, nearly an inch long, should weigh about 80 grains, not 23. But the core in these early bullets was made of plastic. The current P90 bullet weighs 31 grains, and its length has been shortened to 2.1 cm (0.83 inches). That is still too light for a “real” bullet. Now its core is mostly aluminum (at least it’s better than plastic). Despite the changes in its bullet, and absurd exaggerations of its capabilities by FN (claiming it makes a larger wound than a .44 Magnum HP bullet) and by the gun writers who have “evaluated” it (claiming its wounding capacity to be equal to the M16), the P90 has hung around for more than a decade without any notable success.<br><br>FN has recently been joined, in the PDW arena, by the firm of Heckler &amp; Koch. The bullet of their caliber 4.6x30mm HK MP7 is even smaller than that of the P90: its .18 caliber bullet weighs 24.7 grains (to put this in perspective, a .22 Short bullet weighs 29 grains). One must wonder whether Heckler &amp; Koch was inspired to develop the HK MP7 because some military and law enforcement groups purchased their HK53 chambered for the 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge and furnished with a ridiculously short 8.31-inch barrel. I suppose any group that would buy a medium-power varmint rifle, with half its barrel cut off, and think it adequate for use against the human target is so wound ballistics illiterate that they might be sold anything.<br><br>This group of weapons, with tiny bullets in the .22 Short weight range, possessing less wounding capacity than the .22 rimfire magnum bullet, has been given the “catchy” name “Personal Defense Weapons” apparently to make them to appear to be something exceptional &#8211; and to direct the attention of potential purchasers to their name, diverting it from their woefully deficient wounding capacity.<br><br>PDW bullet developers have apparently forgotten that their PDW bullets produce temporary cavities of only about three inches in diameter; and it is well understood that temporary cavities smaller than about five inches in diameter cannot be relied upon to add significantly to a bullet’s wounding capacity on a human target. Perhaps they need to be reminded that bullets injure by disrupting body tissue; and with such negligible temporary cavities, the only tissue the PDW bullets can disrupt is what they strike. The amount of tissue these PDW bullets strike is limited by their size. The FBI’s method of comparing the amount of tissue disruption caused by various bullets compares the bullets’ cross sectional areas (calculated from the formula pi x the square of the bullet’s radius). This means that if one bullet’s diameter is twice that of another, it strikes four times as much tissue. The P90’s .22 caliber bullet, traveling point forward, can strike only 0.038 square inches of tissue as it penetrates. The HK MP7’s .18 caliber bullet can strike only 0.025 square inches. When compared to the 0.1 square inches a 9 mm FMJ bullet strikes, or the 0.16 square inches a .45 ACP FMJ bullet disrupts as it penetrates, the hole size produced by the tiny PDW bullets looks pretty puny. And this comparison is just against the non-deforming military-type FMJ bullets.<br><br>Initially, the PDWs appeared to be aimed at the military market. For the military, often any wound at all is sufficient cause for an enemy soldier to retire from the field of battle. Perhaps the tiny PDW bullets, with only three-fourths the momentum of a .22 rimfire magnum bullet, might be of some use &#8211; if limited strictly to the type of warfare in which troops are not engaged in close-quarters combat.<br><br>Now, however, the PDWs are being marketed to law enforcement “for entry work.” This could prove disastrous. Law enforcement officers often face armed violent criminals at close range. They need a bullet capable of disrupting enough tissue to have a good chance of rapidly incapacitating violent armed criminals. The hole size (tissue disruption) comparison gets much more lopsided here. Law enforcement uses hollow-point handgun bullets, which expand and increase the size of the hole they make. The PDW bullets do not expand. Compare the hole diameters calculated above for the two PDW bullets with the 0.34 square inches produced by the expanded 9mm bullet and the 0.5 square inch hole made by the .45 ACP HP bullet. In case these numbers are not crystal clear — they show that a .45 ACP HP bullet destroys up to 20 times as much tissue as the .18 caliber PDW bullet does.<br><br>Manufacturers’ advertising claims that PDW bullets are effective out to 200 meters, and implies that our current handgun bullets are not. Comparing the momentum and energy of the PDW bullets, at the muzzle, with that of the 9 mm Parabellum: the 9 mm bullet starts out with about 10% more energy but 2.3 times as much momentum. And this might come as a surprise to the layman, but should not to those conversant with basic external ballistics: the 9 mm handgun bullet’s advantage, in both energy and momentum, increases with distance. The higher the velocity and the lower the weight of a bullet, the more rapidly it loses its velocity over distance. This is a basic principle of external ballistics. Due to the PDW bullets’ very light weight, and relatively high velocity, they lose about one fourth of their velocity in their first 100 meters of travel &#8211; and almost that much in their second 100 meters. So the implied advantage of the PDWs over handguns “out to 200 meters” is inconsistent with the facts of external ballistics. For projectiles that do not produce large enough temporary cavities to add significantly to their effect (both handgun and PDW bullets are in that group), the bullet’s momentum is a far more accurate measure of its tissue disruption potential than is its energy &#8211; and that is a basic principle of wound ballistics. By the time both projectiles have reached 100 meters, the 9 mm bullet has about 2.5 times as much momentum as does the PDW bullet. The wounds produced by the PDW bullets compare poorly to those produced by handgun bullets at the muzzle &#8211; and compare even more poorly at 200 meters.<br><br>It is unfortunate that most who depend upon firearms to defend their lives and the lives of others, as well as most who study firearms and write about them, possess little knowledge of wound ballistics. Wound ballistics, the science of projectiles interacting with the body, deals with the end result, toward which all the work and study with firearms and their use is aimed. Without a suitable wound ballistics result, all else is for naught. The following brief “common sense” overview of wound ballistics should help interested readers to support, or expose as false, many of the advertisements regarding bullet effects to which they are subjected. To get a reasonable estimate of a new bullet’s potential, compare its mass and its velocity with other existing bullets. Then consider the animals against which the known bullets have proven effective. The 7.62x51mm NATO rifle bullet is the civilian .308 Winchester: it is effective for shooting essentially all North American big game, including moose, elk, and grizzly bear. The 5.56x45mm NATO rifle bullet is the civilian .223 Remington: it is a “varmint” cartridge, used effectively for shooting woodchucks, crows, and coyotes. Please note that the .223 Remington bullet is prohibited for shooting deer in most states. It lacks the tissue disruption capacity needed to prove reliably lethal on deer (generally a man-sized target). Finally, the PDW bullets. They have no civilian equivalent. They can be compared to the .22 caliber Winchester rimfire magnum bullet. This rimfire bullet is effective on squirrels, crows, opossums, and on woodchucks at ranges under 150 yards.<br><br>As shown in the above comparisons, the PDW bullets are considerably outclassed by the standard military FMJ handgun bullets. When compared to the modern well-constructed hollow-point handgun bullets used by the police, the PDW bullets aren’t even in the same ballpark. By no stretch of the imagination is the PDW bullet adequate for law enforcement work: its use is likely to get police officers killed.<br><br>I have yet to see, in any publication other than the Wound Ballistics Review, a single word of doubt about these weapons. Well known gun magazines have turned down letters, and even refused to publish invited articles, that did not laud the PDWs. I have presented the problem from 1) the historical perspective, 2) the minuscule hole the PDW bullets are capable of producing, 3) the minuscule amount of momentum they possess, and 4) the comparison of PDW bullets to the known capabilities of similar bullets. The conclusions, on all four counts, are undeniable and highly supportive of one another. These pipsqueak PDW projectiles are so puny for anything more pressing than popping rats in the dump, that the popular gun press could provide a necessary public service by providing a warning to the law enforcement community of the PDW bullet’s paltry potential before it is too late.<br><br>Don’t miss the industry response in the next issue of SAR. If you have a professional opinion to add to this debate, please let us know, and submit it for our consideration.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>WWII STYLE M1 RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/wwii-style-m1-rifle-marksmanship-training/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert Bruce “The Garand Match is designed to make the enjoyment and historical purposes of competitive shooting available to many more shooters by limiting the rifles used in this competition to “as-issued” American military rifles that are readily available to almost all shooters at affordable prices.” John C. Garand 2001 National Match Official Program With [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Robert Bruce</strong><br><br><em>“The Garand Match is designed to make the enjoyment and historical purposes of competitive shooting available to many more shooters by limiting the rifles used in this competition to “as-issued” American military rifles that are readily available to almost all shooters at affordable prices.”</em> John C. Garand 2001 National Match Official Program</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="700" height="409" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8258" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-9.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-9-300x175.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>When the command “FALL IN” was barked at 0900 hrs on Saturday morning, it didn’t take long for the rifle squad to be standing tall with their rifles at “order arms.&#8221;</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>With increased availability of surplus military M1 rifles through the Civilian Marksmanship Program and other sources, numerous civilian shooting clubs all over America regularly conduct their own JOHN C. GARAND MATCHES as a preliminary to the annual National Matches at Camp Perry, Ohio. Fired with ordinary ball ammunition at 200 yards in a variety of positions using unmodified American service rifles like the M1 Garand, the ’03 Springfield and even the M1 Carbine, this competition is fun and rewarding for novices and expert riflemen alike.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="421" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8260" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-11-300x180.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-11-309x186.jpg 309w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Established in the dark days following America’s entry into WWII, the base still serves as a military training facility under control of the North Carolina National Guard and is regularly used by a wide variety of military and law enforcement organizations.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>No formal marksmanship training is required of shooters, who are also not restricted by age, sex, or skill level. Most matches, while well supervised and controlled for safety and integrity of scoring, are rather relaxed affairs. Comfortable civilian attire and all sorts of amenities such as powerful spotting scopes, luxuriously thick ground pads, special shooting jackets, sun umbrellas, and coolers full of refreshing soft drinks are the order of the day.</p>



<p>While such niceties certainly make the usual Garand Match pleasurable, this just doesn’t have the right flavor for certain types of shooters. These slightly curmudgeonly competitors &#8211; some perhaps harking back to their young adulthood in service of Uncle Sam &#8211; seek to re-create those days of yore when the science and art of riflery was taught and mastered for the most serious of reasons.<br><br><strong>Old Hickory Association</strong><br><br>One such group of borderline grouches can be found in the North Carolina based Old Hickory Association. These guys make preparation for both local and national level Garand Matches a particularly colorful and meaningful experience by conducting preliminary training and range firing just like American soldiers did in WWII.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="468" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8261" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-8.jpg 468w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-8-201x300.jpg 201w" sizes="(max-width: 468px) 100vw, 468px" /><figcaption><em>Instructor Jim Higgins points out how Mike Owens has assumed the correct positioning of the M1 rifle when firing from the sitting position.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>“When you go out to the range in the uniform of a WWII GI, with the same kind of rifle and qualifying the way they did, it can’t help but make you appreciate what all these guys went through to prepare for combat.” Paul Gill, Old Hickory Association<br><br>The group’s current president, Don Shupe, is quick to point out OHA’s official purpose. “We are historians, collectors, military vehicle enthusiasts, and reenactors dedicated to keeping the memory of the soldiers of the 30th Infantry Division alive,” he said. This is done, Shupe added, through activities like research, study, numerous public displays and occasional historical re-creation.<br><br>This last category is usually associated with groups of uniformed historical military enthusiasts who get together for mock combat using blank ammunition. Perhaps the best known manifestation of this phenomenon can be found all over America in various Civil War commemorative battles, as well as live fire competitive shooting called “skirmishes.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="459" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8262" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-9.jpg 459w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-9-197x300.jpg 197w" sizes="(max-width: 459px) 100vw, 459px" /><figcaption><em>A regulation US Army rifle rack serves as security for the unit’s M1 Garands.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>According to Shupe, the same sort of thing applies to activities of Old Hickory members except that their chosen time period is 1940 to 1945 when America mobilized for WWII. Not coincidentally, given the focus of this feature article, this is also the heyday of the incomparable M1 Garand Rifle, rightly called by famous General George Patton, “The greatest battle implement ever devised.”<br><br><strong>The Army Way&#8230;</strong><br><br>Recently, members and invited guests gathered at historic Camp Butner, located off Interstate 85 about twenty miles north of Durham, for a weekend of basic training in rifle marksmanship and other military subjects. Built in 1943, the camp is still an active training base under command of the North Carolina National Guard and its facilities are regularly utilized by various military, law enforcement and other organizations.<br><br>Of particular interest to the OHA membership is Butner’s classic 1000 yard Known Distance Range, essentially unchanged since when it was first constructed about 57 years ago! Several civilian high power matches are held there each year as regularly noted in various NRA bulletins.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="492" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8263" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-6-300x211.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>“Forward March!” The column of shooters moves out smartly at the start of a mile long hike over to Range 4.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The association, currently around fifty members strong, enjoys a close relationship with the North Carolina National Guard, many of whom still wear the 30th’s distinctive red and blue oval patch. As such, Shupe says, “We support the Guard with historical displays of artifacts, vehicles and authentically uniformed personnel, and they return the favor by allowing us to use their facilities for reenactments and range firing.”<br><br>Small Arms Review was invited to the club’s spring rifle weekend to both participate in and do a feature article on this unique event. The author, who learned to shoot the M1 as a seventeen year old recruit in the Virginia Army National Guard way back in 1964, brought along his recently acquired CMP Garand for its first firing since coming out of cosmoline (the rifle, not the author) late last year.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="457" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8264" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-3-300x196.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Range 4 at Camp Butner is a classic WWII period 1000 yard range, seen here from its furthest firing point. Additional firing points are set up at 100 yard intervals so the range to the target is precisely established for instructional and record fire purposes. This is why it is called a “Known Distance” range.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>We caught up with Shupe and about fifteen other uniformed WWII reenactors on Friday evening as they were moving gear and rifles into a no-frills bivouac area not far from Camp Butner’s headquarters. Olive drab canvas cots covered with brown GI wool blankets soon sprang up in orderly rows inside the small cinderblock buildings. As darkness fell gasoline lanterns provided light, their persistent hiss serving as background noise to lively conversation mixed with 1940’s swing music from a tape recorder hidden inside a vintage radio. You didn’t even need to close your eyes to imagine that this could actually be a typical evening during WWII.<br><br><strong>Rise and Shine</strong><br><br>First formation on Saturday morning was at a leisurely 0900 (that’s 9am for you civilians), allowing plenty of time for shaving and chow. This was an opportunity for a number of traditional military activities including inspection of uniforms and weapons, an orientation on the day’s planned activities, and some much-needed practice in close order drill. Interestingly, although nearly half of the participants had never served in the military, it takes much coaching by unit top sergeant Mark “Sparky” Burfete before the squad could do a passable job.<br><br>Next on the agenda was an hour-long class in fundamentals of rifle marksmanship conducted by Jim Higgins, in real life a pension plan administrator. Higgins is an accomplished competitive high power rifle shooter and, along with demonstrations by his friend Mike Owens, he led the group through such basics as sling adjustment as well as standard Army positions for prone, sitting, kneeling and standing. This was followed by a considerable amount of time for individuals to practice their shooting positions, with the benefit of corrections and suggestions from the instructor team and other old hands.<br><br>The final phase of the morning’s refresher course was a classic military style chalkboard lecture (though a modern dry erase board was standing in for the traditional blackboard) on sight alignment and steady hold factors of breathing, aiming and squeezing off each shot. The windage and elevation rule as it applies to multiples of 100 yards and “click” adjustment of the M1’s excellent rear sight was also explained in depth.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8265" width="449" height="700" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-3.jpg 449w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-3-192x300.jpg 192w" sizes="(max-width: 449px) 100vw, 449px" /><figcaption><em>Targets are installed on the electrical lift frames and are ready for a motor test.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Forward March!</strong><br><br>Although the range was located more than a mile away, these guys didn’t climb into their family cars for a comfortable ride over. Instead, the command was given for “Right Shoulder Arms” and the column of reenactors moved out at a brisk pace accompanied by vintage GI cadence calls. Meanwhile, Shupe and others had loaded some necessary gear into his WWII US Army weapons carrier truck (sort of like a 1940’s version of the HUMM-VEE) and gone ahead to begin setting up for the day’s shooting. The author bummed a ride on a jeep, professing he had too much heavy camera equipment to lug it over on foot. Yeah, right&#8230;.<br><br>First stop for all was the target pits, a long wide ditch holding a reinforced concrete bunker and a wall safely fronted with a thick mound of earth to stop incoming bullets. There, a long column of large rectangular frames awaited installation of the large paper bullseye targets. About the only change to have been applied to this classic target pit area since WWII is a modification to the old manually lifted frames. Now, these are motorized and can be controlled either by individual scorers or in unison from a central panel.<br><br>The course of fire used by the group is a slightly modified version of the John C. Garand Match, Course B (Table 7 of 2001 CMP Competition Rules), so the troops busied themselves with staple guns to attach the first set of regulation “Target, Rifle Competition SR, 200 Yards” to thick cardboard backings on sturdy wooden frames. This is the military equivalent of the NRA 200 yard SR target as specified under CMP rules.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="464" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8266" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-3.jpg 464w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-3-199x300.jpg 199w" sizes="(max-width: 464px) 100vw, 464px" /><figcaption><em>Rifleman Charlie Thierry stands next to the US Army standard TARGET, RIFLE COMPETITION “SR” 200 YARDS, providing a handy reference to its size.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Even old timers may agree that the staple gun is a welcome change from buckets of sloppy and stinking wheat paste originally used. These frames, in turn, were raised into position on the metal holders and lift motors were checked for proper function. Five firing points were set up and the group split into shooters and scorers for the first round of qualification.<br><br>Steel ammo boxes containing a supply of pasters and spotters were handed out at each target position. Pasters are rolls of rectangular white or black stickers used to cover previous bullet holes after recording the hit. Another modern innovation is the “peel and stick” paster &#8211; no need to swipe your tongue over a nasty tasting glue backing made from dead mules. Spotters are various sizes of thick cardboard discs that are black on one side and white on the other, with a pointed spindle in the middle. These are used to mark the location of each hit during zeroing so as to make this impact point clearly visible to shooters way back on the firing line.<br><br>When everything was in order, Jim Higgins gathered the whole group around a target to explain how spotting and scoring is done. Immediate feedback to shooters is given after each zeroing or practice shot by dropping the target frame and marking the location and value of each hit. Depending on whether the hit is in the white or black on the target, the appropriate side of the spotter is stuck into place so as to contrast with the background.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="456" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8267" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-2-300x195.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Shooters settle into the prone position and begin a slow series of individual “sighting shots” to help determine the correct settings on their rifles for windage and elevation.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Also, a bright orange spotter disc is stuck into a standard place on the perimeter of the target indicating the value of the hit. When the target is raised again, the location and value of the hit can be easily seen from the firing line without the need for binoculars or spotting scopes. Sight adjustments are made by the shooter when the target is dropped for pasting, then the frames are raised again for the next shot. At the end of a multi-shot rapid fire stage, all hits are indicated at one time by placing smaller spotters in each hole. Scoring is done in the pits by each target puller and recorded on the scorecard seen in the accompanying illustration.<br><br>This procedure is simpler than the old way that is spelled out in the 1943 version of Army Field Manual 23-5, the “bible” of M1 shooting. Gone is the need for a confusing set of different paddles to indicate hits and their values and the embarrassing waving of the red “Maggie’s drawers” flag when missing entirely.<br><br>A nice touch of authenticity was also provided in the pits by installing a functioning WWII model EE-8 field telephone. This battery-operated phone was connected to another on the 200 yard firing line by genuine two strand GI “commo wire, rolled out from a big reel mounted in the back of Shupe’s weapons carrier. A hand-cranked ringer on the side of the phone signals the other end to pick up the handset for necessary consultation.<br><br><strong>“Ready On The Firing Line”</strong><br><br>The first five shooters gathered up their gear and marched uprange to the 200 yard line, taking note of the furiously snapping red flags at the left and right range limits. Wind velocity was fierce at this time of the morning and alternated from coming directly cross range at the 9 o’clock direction to a slightly less objectionable 7 o’clock. This would definitely give them problems with bullet drift so some calculated sight adjustments would be in order.<br><br>Each individual supplied his own ammunition and these boxes, previously loaded onto the weapons carrier, were retrieved and taken to numbered firing points on the line. Following last minute function checks and spot lubrication, a cleaning rod was run through every rifle barrel as a final safety check to ensure no obstructions were present.<br><br>After another brief review of rules and procedures by Higgins, individual shooters went about the process of preparing for zeroing. Rifles, ammo and miscellaneous gear were laid out on tent shelter half sections or ponchos. Initial sight adjustments were made and recorded and loop slings were snugged up per Army regulations. It was time to start shooting.<br><br>As previously mentioned, the OHA has slightly modified the Course B Match for this instructional firing. First, keeping in mind that this is a training exercise and not a sanctioned match, each shooter can fire up to ten rounds to obtain or confirm a proper zero &#8211; five more rounds than Course B rules. This very important preliminary is usually limited to ten minutes, but more time can be taken if individual shooters are having problems. Then, the first record stage, Slow Prone, is fired with twenty rounds in twenty minutes. This is five minutes less than standard because zeroing/practices shots have already been taken care of.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="433" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8268" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-1-300x186.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Shupe carefully putting holes into target #32. The importance of paying attention to those large numbered panels in front of each target is a sad lesson to some shooters who lose valuable points by carelessly firing on the wrong one.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>Seventy seconds for ten rounds of rapid fire from standing to prone is the second stage, starting with two rounds locked and loaded then requiring a quick reload with a fresh eight round clip. Third stage is also ten shots rapid fire in sixty seconds. CMP rules have this done from standing to sitting, but OHA training weekend shooters can substitute the kneeling position if desired. Finally, standing position slow fire gives ten minutes to get off ten shots; the same under both sets of rules.<br><br>Higgins points out that these small departures are considered by OHA to be a good balance between preparation for sanctioned matches under strict Course A or B rules, and the group’s desire to conduct effective marksmanship training. “The basic structure of the Garand Match is maintained,” he says,” but the way it’s done at this event gives us flexibility along with some real WWII flavor.”<br><br>This observation is echoed by member Francis “FJ” Hale, both a High Power competition and Three Gun Tactical Match shooter. “Those old Army positions and techniques from WWII adapt very well to modern competitive shooting,” Hale says, “you don’t need to change them to be good.”<br><br>After completion of the course of fire, the shooters policed up brass, secured all their gear, and marched off to swap positions with target pullers in the pits, giving their buddies a turn topside. This was also a time for some good-natured ribbing as shooters compared their scores and contemplated the settlement of friendly wagers.<br><br><strong>First My Rifle, Then Me&#8230;</strong><br><br>The Old Hickory shooters marched back to camp where they found that the day’s measure of authentic military activities was not over yet. Cleaning gear was broken out and rifles stripped, scrubbed and oiled on handy concrete benches. Then, as they awaited arrival of their “hobo pack” suppers (burgers, taters and carrots baked in foil) a series of short lectures were given on the history of the 30th Division in WWII. Are we having fun yet?<br><br>Oh, by the way, the author’s M1 rifle marksmanship skills have decidedly deteriorated after decades of neglect. While not revealing the full extent of this ruination, suffice to say much practice will be needed before he enters a sanctioned Garand Match. On a more positive note, his beautiful old Springfield-made M1, born in March of 1944 and still sporting the WWII style locking bar rear sight, performed flawlessly “right out of the box” as received from the CMP.<br><br><strong>Find Out More</strong><br><br>* Although the WWII M1 Rifle Marksmanship training weekend is a recent development, the OHA has conducted an official CMP-sanctioned John C. Garand Match each October since 1995. Interested shooters or potential recruits should contact the Old Hickory Association c/o Don Shupe, 414 Cary Pines Dr., Cary, NC 27513<br><br>* Camp Butner Training Site, North Carolina National Guard at www.ncguard.com/butner/butner/oldhickoryassociation.html<br><br>* For information on M1 rifle sales and high power competition shooting contact the Civilian Marksmanship Program, PO Box 576, Port Clinton, OH 43452 or www.odcmp.com<br><br><strong>About the Author</strong><br><br>Robert Bruce, An SAR “Usual Suspect,” is an internationally published writer and photographer who specializes in modern military small arms subjects for magazines and books. He is perhaps best known as compiler and publisher of The M1 does MY talking!, a pictorial history of the incomparable Garand rifle.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE BAR IN VIETNAM: LEGACY OF THE FRENCH</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-bar-in-vietnam-legacy-of-the-french/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browning Automatic Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James L. Ballou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By James L. Ballou Since the BAR (Browning Automatic Rifle) was phased out of US Service in 1957, some might believe the BAR was not used in the Vietnam conflict, but they would be wrong. The French had been supplied with BAR’s from World War II for post war rearmament. Much US equipment was used [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>James L. Ballou</strong><br><br>Since the BAR (Browning Automatic Rifle) was phased out of US Service in 1957, some might believe the BAR was not used in the Vietnam conflict, but they would be wrong. The French had been supplied with BAR’s from World War II for post war rearmament. Much US equipment was used by French forces to fight the Viet Minh. It might surprise some Vietnam veterans to know that the American OSS fought side-by-side and even trained Ho Chi Minh and General Vo Nguyen Giap, who became one of our most treacherous adversaries.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="452" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8272" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-10-300x194.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>VC with BARs captured from French.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Between 1946-1953 French forces in Indo China made great use of American World War II weaponry including the BAR. By the time they left, many BAR’s had been captured from them. Also, Communist China supplied BAR’s that they had captured from the US in the Korean Conflict.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="484" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8273" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-12-300x207.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>VC with BAR. </em><br><em><strong>U.S. Army Photo</strong>.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The world held its breath in 1954 with the great battle at Dien Bien Phu. At that time Ho’s forces were armed with everything from World War II Japanese rifles to BAR’s captured from the French. We should have learned from the defeat of the French, who had the toughest troops in Indo China at the time.<br><br>From 1959 to 1961 our involvement in the conflict was only clandestine under the auspices of the CIA, the successor of the OSS. By 1961 American Special Forces began the slide into Southeast Asia that lead to our costliest war both in logistics and in world prestige.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="406" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8274" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-9.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-9-300x174.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Edson’s Raiders. Note the burlap helmet covers. </em><br><em><strong>Photo courtesy Robert Bruce Photography.</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The Viet Cong, who supplanted the Viet Minh, used the BAR as effectively as Edson’s Raiders did during World War II. Mounting it on the bow of a rubber boat or a sampan gave the mobile firepower for which the BAR was intended.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="414" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8275" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-10-300x177.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Members of III Corps MIKE Force returning from a search and destroy mission during Operation Golden Gate in November of 1966. </em><br><em><strong>U.S. Army Photo.</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Most of my stories come from Vets with fond remembrance of the BAR. One spoke highly of the diminutive Montagnard who saved his life with his agile use of the heavy weapon. Another story involved a pilot flying a Navy Sea Stallion Helicopter on an air sea rescue of a downed aircraft crew. On their way back to base they were hit by AA fire from a Dshk-38 that caused engine failure from the 12.7x108mm round. They auto-gyroed down safely and began the overland trek to the base. They were eventually ambushed from a VC position reinforced with logs. The pilot’s “bail out” gun was a BAR. He made short work of the enemy with well-placed bursts that drilled on through the log barriers. Don’t tell him the BAR was obsolete.<br><br>Most BAR’s were employed by ARVN troops under South Vietnam command, but they were reluctant to use them because they were heavy and drew fire. Most photos show them with the weapon carried on their shoulders, muzzle forward.<br><br>One e-mail I received related how much the Montagnards loved the BAR. The rifles were issued by the 5th Group Special Forces and had been reconditioned by their armories in Pleiku. The Montagnards were tough, loyal fighters. I did some contract work in Cambodia in 1966-68, and was amazed to see the agility and ease with which they handled the 20-pound weapon.<br><br>Another Vet remembered BAR’s aboard the Carrier USS Valley Forge. Possibly these BAR’s were in 7.62x51mm NATO since the US Navy was the last US force to officially have it in their inventory. To accomplish this of course the rifle had to be re-barreled. Since the NATO cartridge is shortened, the magazine-well had to be modified to accept an entirely new magazine that was similar but not identical to the M-14. In addition, the ejection port was elongated and the gas port enlarged to increase the amount of gas pressure impinging upon the piston. This led to the T-34 BAR as described in Springfield Armory Publication, Notes on Development for project TS 2-2015 dated March 16,1949.<br><br>Though the M60 was the primary GPMG (General Purpose Machine Gun) during the Vietnam War, the BAR was often the primary MG of the diminutive ARVN troops, again proving the BAR was best issued to a smaller man, as he made a smaller target.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>METAL STORMING THE GATES: NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION’S 2001 SMALL ARMS CONFERENCE</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/metal-storming-the-gates-national-defense-industrial-associations-2001-small-arms-conference/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bertha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DARPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN-PGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M82A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metal Storm Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ULTIMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLe]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert Bruce “This technology is revolutionary. It is functionally different from all previous gun system designs&#8230;it has the potential to be the safest and most controllable gun system ever designed.” News release from METAL STORM partner Science Applications International Corporation Long time readers of Small Arms Review should know by now that my favorite annual [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Robert Bruce</strong><br><br><em>“This technology is revolutionary. It is functionally different from all previous gun system designs&#8230;it has the potential to be the safest and most controllable gun system ever designed.”</em> News release from METAL STORM partner Science Applications International Corporation</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="466" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8281" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-11.jpg 466w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-11-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 466px) 100vw, 466px" /><figcaption><em>Ghillie suited 1LT Michael Dunaway of the Army National Guard’s Marksmanship Training Center at Camp Robinson, Arkansas, with the formidable Barrett M82A1 .50 caliber sniper rifle topped by a 10 power Swarovski optic. This semiauto powerhouse is particularly well suited for both antipersonnel and antimateriel work at extreme range.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Long time readers of Small Arms Review should know by now that my favorite annual gun event is NDIA’s get-together for manportable weaponry enthusiasts, known formally as the Joint Services Small Arms Symposium, Exhibition &amp; Firing Demonstration. I look forward to this in much the same way a kid anticipates Christmas morning when friends and family gather, gifts are opened, and there are lots of great new toys to play with.<br><br>This year’s three day fete was held in mid-August in a swanky hotel in downtown Little Rock, Arkansas (insert your own Bill Clinton and Paula Jones joke here), featuring the usual mix of thoughtful technical papers, exciting industry exhibits, and the chance to go out to the range for some earplug-packing, gunsmoke-snorting live-fire fun.<br><br>Now, there is much new and improved hardware to report on that is of immediate interest and practical value for military, police and civilian shooters. However, let’s start with something we saw there that may be a year or two away from the hands of freedom’s defenders but has damn sure got the attention of the firearms establishment right this very minute.<br><br><strong>METAL STORM</strong><br><br>“My amazement is at the process — O’Dwyer didn’t blow up a barrel or kill himself in making it.” SAIC Physicist Adam Drobot, quoted in Scientific American magazine.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="527" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8282" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-13-300x226.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>At the core of the (Metal Storm) technology’s capabilities is a projectile design, which enables multiple high-pressure projectiles to be stacked in-line in a barrel, and then electrically fired in sequence.” Projectiles ranging in size from 9mm pistol to 40mm grenade launcher have been successfully fired. </em><br><em><strong>Credit: Metal Storm Limited</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>I can’t think of a better name than METAL STORM to represent Australian inventor Mike O’Dwyer’s bold new concept in projectile pushing at fantastic rates and quantities. Now with private and government financing in excess of $400 million, O’Dwyers multinational corporation seems likely to brush aside nearly a millennium of warfare’s established launcher and payload technology.<br><br>Overhearing mutterings from a number of exhibitors and other conference attendees about some “weird Star Wars stuff”, I hastened to METAL STORM’s booth and wormed my way through the crowd to snag some promotional materials. Retreating to a quiet corner, I skimmed the handouts and zeroed in on the vivid description of its operational principle. O’Dwyer’s inspiration came, we are told, by the speed and precision of an inkjet printer head on his everyday desktop computer. This led him, by trial and error (fortunately not life-threatening error), to have a computer program electronically fire rounds at infinitely tailorable speeds and sequences.<br><br>In his METAL STORM ballistic system, the only significant moving parts are projectiles from uniquely designed (also patented) caseless ammunition, loaded one in front of the other as many as practical depending on the length and caliber of the launch tube. Discarded entirely are all the usual mechanical contrivances required by existing multi-shot weaponry for feeding, mechanically firing, extracting and ejecting. Time to reload? Just rip out and replace the pre-loaded, non-metallic barrel cluster.<br><br>Does it work? Documented firings of “Bertha,” the thirty-six barrel, 9mm prototype, burping out 180 rounds in about one one-hundredth of a second, have established a new official Guinness World Record. Is it practical? For one thing, this sealed block of bullets and barrels could prove vastly superior to complicated and maintenance-intensive cannon caliber Gatling type systems now protecting many free world warships against EXOCET type missiles.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="550" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8283" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-10-300x236.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>This dramatic photograph shows early test prototype “Bertha” firing 180 rounds of 9mm ammo at a million rounds per minute! </em><br><em><strong>Credit: Metal Storm Limited</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Advanced Sniper Rifle</strong><br><br>Numerous demonstrations of Bertha and other configurations including a handgun have been conducted for high level leaders in military and scientific communities in Australia and the US. This has resulted in a gusher of RDT&amp;E funding including a $10 million contract from DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the Holy Grail of America’s defense technology, to develop the Advanced Sniper Rifle.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8284" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-11-300x200.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Baltimore Police Officer Phil Crumbacher (left) congratulates William “Bart” Bartholomew for being selected by NDIA as the Carlos Hathcock Award winner for 2001. Created in the name of the US Marine Corps’ legendary Vietnam War sniper, the Hathcock award honors individuals who have made significant contributions to the discipline of long range precision tactical shooting. The award plaque in front features an exact replica of Gunnery Sergeant Hathcock’s weapon.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The cluster of four barrels on the rifle’s conceptual prototype is apparently its only unconventional aspect. Microprocessor based fire control allows the gunner to key in and send the best combination of a variety of projectiles as required for antipersonnel or antimateriel applications. Aiming and related functions are to be optimized using ongoing developments from such official US government initiatives as the very expensive “Objective Individual Combat Weapon” and the very spooky “Project White Feather.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="571" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8285" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-7-300x245.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Noted gun writer and SAR “usual suspect” Charles Cutshaw (left) and distinguished gun designer James Sullivan with NDIA’s George M. Chinn Award. Cutshaw’s nomination resulted in NDIA selecting Sullivan as the 2001 Chinn honoree. The annual award goes to an individual with a distinguished history of small arms innovation.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Electronic Handgun</strong><br><br>METAL STORM is also creating quite a buzz in the world of law enforcement with the O’Dwyer Vle (Variable Lethality Law Enforcement handgun). Another Guinness honoree as the world’s first 100 percent electronic handgun, as of this writing it is a single barrel, seven shot working prototype. In addition to a personalization feature that will let only one specific officer fire the weapon (desirable if it’s taken in a scuffle or otherwise lost) its computer chip “brain” also stores additional keypad instructions from the gunner. This allows tailoring of each firing among a number of options including single shot (semi-auto), double tap, triple tap, or high energy modes. This last setting kicks out two shots at a mind-boggling 500,000 rpm so as to drill right through body armor!<br><br>Subsequent handgun models forseen by METAL STORM include multiple barrels in a soft recoil mount with different ammo ranging from “less lethal” stuff like stun bags and CS, to conventional kinetic energy terminators.</p>



<p>Dick Tracy take note: The Vle will eventually be equipped, we are told, with any number of optional gadgets like a two-way radio for immediate situation reporting and “advice” from the incident commander, as well as a GPS so everybody knows where the gun and its owner are located. Even “political correctness” can be enforced by a provision for a superior to electronically jam the weapon if a combat-stressed peace officer is about to take out the “wrong” category of miscreant at an embarrassing moment. Try explaining that to the family of the subsequently slain or horribly injured officer&#8230;</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="660" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8286" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-4-300x283.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The prototype O’Dwyer Vle Military and Police Handgun is said to be the world’s only 100% electronic pistol. This single barrel 9mm test model has successfully fired two round “high energy” bursts at a rate of 1/2 million rounds per minute. </em><br><em><strong>Credit: Metal Storm Limited</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Other applications of METAL STORM technology cry out for development. According to O’Dwyer in his formal technical presentation at the event, some military initiatives include several already funded programs such as the Area Denial Weapons System (minefield replacement), vehicle self-defense, and arming of unmanned aircraft.<br><br>Not surprisingly, much of the muttering about METAL STORM overheard at the show is coming from established gun and ammo makers. Many of those who do not have their heads in the sand are understandably concerned by the potential of the O’Dwyer system for rather quickly putting conventional firearms in the same category as bows and arrows in the atomic age. In response, numerous very legitimate objections and cautions are being raised including danger from exploding barrels and system vulnerability to EMP (electro-magnetic pulse). So, SAR will be watching and reporting as this story unfolds.<br><br><strong>Back to Earth</strong><br><br>The symposium part at NDIA is like going to school for a highly concentrated series of half-hour lectures on the latest developments in guns, ammo, sights and related things that are of value to the soldier and policeman. This year’s lineup of distinguished speakers presented some 48 technical and informational papers, most well illustrated with computer-generated visuals and some with fascinating video clips. Space does not permit a detailed account here, but what follows are some of the highlights. Those with internet access plus the time and tenacity to delve deeper are encouraged to access the full collection of technical presentations that are thoughtfully posted by NDIA in cooperation with the Defense Technical Information Center for your viewing pleasure at www.dtic.mil/ndia/2001smallarms/2001smallarms.html<br><br><strong>Small Arms Master Plan</strong><br><br>As should be expected, there is intense interest from many directions in the formal plans that the US military has for research, development and procurement of weapon systems. After all, America’s Armed Forces are the free world’s largest and have the most money to spend. This is well covered each year by a series of presentations from top names in the Joint Services Small Arms Program (JSSAP) who tend to cover everything from improving the old stuff currently in use (now euphemistically called “legacy systems”) to crystal ball projections of at what is possible ten or twenty years out.<br><br>Some short-term projects include development of non-lethal ammo that will work the semiauto action of the new M1014 shotgun (which works just fine right now with crowd control loads by pulling back on the charging handle after each shot) plus ways to lighten existing weapons like the M249 Squad Auto Weapon and the M240B Machine Gun. In the mid term, the US military wants an Advanced Medium Machine Gun &#8211; presumably to finalize the lingering death of the tin can M60 and replace the ultra-reliable M240 even though it will probably be lighter by then. Finally, programs are well underway to harness various forms of directed energy (real ray guns, sonic blasters, and who knows what else) for use in WWIII.<br><br>Interestingly, both the Objective Individual Combat Weapon and the Objective Crew Served Weapon have been bumped up a notch in funding and fielding and are said to be on track for FUE (First Unit Equipped) in 2009. It will be quite fascinating to see if METAL STORM technology has any impact on these programs in the next couple of years.<br><br><strong>The Few, The Proud, The Oughta Be Better Equipped&#8230;</strong><br><br>A bare-knuckled assessment of the current state of US Marine Corps weapons and equipment for amphibious warriors at the spear point was delivered by Lieutenant Colonel James Diehl of Systems Command, with a bit of dry humor backed up with lots of actual instances. For example, don’t tell the bad guys, but after making sure first line guns stay up and running, the Marines don’t have enough maintenance money to repair and recondition the M249’s in wartime reserve!<br><br>A later presentation by a top-level guy from JSSAP noted an $11 million shortfall in funding the Army’s small arms rebuild program to keep “legacy” guns working. Yes, they’re all waiting for something to happen from that presidential campaign-promise that “Help is on the way.”<br><br>LTC Diehl’s laundry list of the Corps’ initiatives includes dropping the 60mm mortar in favor of a lighter but longer-reaching 81mm, more M4 carbines and their add-on accessories, ensuring all optical devices have laser-proof coating, and painting all those black guns and other stuff “Coyote Brown” for better camouflage. The Corps is also seriously exploring the use of ceramic liners to enhance performance of machine gun barrels, searching for more effective airbursting fuses, and seems to have a healthy skepticism toward Army plans to replace the combat classic M26 “Lemon Frag” grenade with something smaller and lighter so that girls can throw it.<br><br>Oh, and by the way, the Marines are once again taking a hard look at and doing live-fire testing of Jim Sullivan’s light, compact and highly controllable ULTIMAX 5.56mm Squad Auto Weapon. Sullivan, by the way, is also the guy who worked on making Stoner’s AR-10 into the M16, designed the incomparable C-MAG, and lots too much more to mention.<br><br><strong>High Tech Crap</strong><br><br>The irreverent Mr. Sullivan himself was on hand at the meeting to receive this year’s prestigious George M. Chinn Award for his lifetime of high achievement in the small arms world. He delighted many and offended others with pungent remarks during his acceptance speech, decrying such “fribble-frabble of fashion” as full-auto provision on individual weapons and the expensive, heavy, complex “high tech crap” that is likely to break or otherwise be rendered useless in the crucible of combat. Nothing stings so much as the truth&#8230;<br><br>Sullivan wasn’t the only iconoclast to shake up this gentlemen’s club with frank and pungent opinions. Reed Knight, Mr. SEAL Weapons himself, delivered a lively talk formally titled “Challenge for the Defense Industry.” Noting JSSAP’s commendable and continuing search for weaponry that is more reliable, easier to make and maintain, lighter and more effective, he criticized the often poorly thought out and confusingly written requirements documents put out by the military’s bureaucracy that contractors must bid on. “The customer needs to clearly set goals, challenges and rewards,” Knight said, “and say what you are willing to pay to meet those needs.”<br><br><strong>SOCOM</strong><br><br>Special Operations Command (SOCOM) has lots of things underway to support Rangers, SEALs, Special Forces and such, but their three big initiatives are the Advanced Light Grenade Launcher (the SACO 40mm showcased last year), a 7.62mm Lightweight Machine Gun (SEALs have pretty much used up all their specially chopped M60s), plus more and improved bells and whistles for the M4 carbine and the Navy’s new Mark 11 Mod O (Knight’s SR 25) sniper rifle.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="579" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8287" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-4-300x248.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Knight’s Armament Company’s 7.62mm SR-25 rifle is now in use by Navy SEALs as the Mark 11 Mod O with suppressor, Leupold scope and bipod.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Step Right Up</strong><br><br>Now, unrelated to SOCOM’s presentation but as luck would have it, Knight’s Manufacturing and more than forty other business and government entities were downstairs in the exhibit hall with a whole bunch of exciting hardware. This is a great place to pick up and point exotic guns, eyeball the latest in sighting systems and often be able to talk with the actual person who designed and/or built them.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="372" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8288" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-4-300x159.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>At its first public showing, this is the “proof of concept” prototype of Knight’s Takedown 700 rifle for relatively close range applications using subsonic ammo.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Taking Knight’s for example, they had brought along not only the SR-25 in various configurations, but a whole array of new and improved items like their Rail Adapter System’s MRE (Modular Receiver Extension with “more real estate”). This is a response to the very critical need of many spec-ops types for lots more space to clamp on any number of devices as dictated by particular missions.<br><br>They also offer a bunch of things to clamp on to US military and other small arms including a forward pistol grip, bipod, various suppressors, and the in-line “KnightScope Model 007.” This unity magnification image intensifier is intended for tandem mounting with the customer’s preferred day scope, giving around-the-clock operation capability.<br><br>Oh, and if you want a handguard for your M4 carbine in the stylish new “Coyote Brown” or other terrain matching colors such as green or white, Knight’s can fix you right up.<br><br>Many other great companies were on hand with cutting-edge products like the Leitz Pocket Laser Rangefinder, AirMunition marking rounds, Armalite Mk 19 blank adapter, and lots of night vision devices.<br><br><strong>Free Range Time</strong><br><br>This year’s host for the event’s all-important live fire portion was the National Guard Marksmanship Training Center at nearby Camp Joseph T. Robinson. They had set aside Range 13, a classic Known Distance facility dating all the back to WWI, and thoughtfully provided a diverse and interesting array of hard and soft targets to accommodate a full spectrum of weapons from 9mm handguns to .50 caliber sniper rifles. In addition to such classics as swinging steel plate silhouettes and oil drums (empty, of course), there were several old 2 1/2 ton trucks positioned at various distances. Also, Caswell International set up a bunch of their radio-controlled popup target mechanisms complete with stroboscopic hostile fire simulators that are particularly lively in the dark.<br><br>Yes, in the dark. This year a significant departure from the usual blistering summer afternoon range ordeal called for the live fire demos to begin about 90 minutes before sunset — right after a speech by Little Rock’s mayor and a tasty barbecue supper. Theoretically, this was going to allow sufficient daylight for regular “shoot and tell” by nine companies, and then as darkness fell the night sight guys would have perfect conditions.<br><br>Well, a combination of factors delayed the first rounds going downrange and frequent halts for safe passage of small planes to and from a nearby airport meant that most of the rest of the live fire was done under conditions rapidly progressing from low light to pitch black. But hey, that’s a lot like what the real world imposes on infantrymen and generator-mounted floodlights give sufficient illumination to allow spectators to see what was being demonstrated. Suck it up and drive on.<br><br><strong>Oldies but Goodies</strong><br><br>Another departure from the norm was conspicuous in the evening’s first demonstration. Distinguished retired soldiers Colonel Tom Brown (now with VT Kinetics) and Colonel John Meloy (now with Benelli) put on vintage US Army uniforms and live fired several of the classic infantry weapons that were used in World Wars One and Two. Taking the microphone while “Private Benelli” stepped up to the firing line, Brown pointedly contrasted these old machined steel and hardwood guns with the sheet metal, cast aluminum and plastic weaponry of the period from the Vietnam War to the present. “These,” he said, “are the guns that actually won wars.”<br><br><strong>New Generation</strong><br><br>Moving down the firing line as twilight rapidly deepened into purple then black, subsequent presentations of ten to fifteen minutes each were made by VT Kinetics firing the ULTIMAX and the SAR-21, GEMTECH suppressors, HK’s new P2000 pistol, PDW and chopped G36k assault carbine. Knight’s Armament fired several KnightSight equipped suppressed weapons including their 5.56mm SR-15 and 7.62mm SR-25, dramatically closing with a long belt of ball and tracers full auto from a Stoner Light Machine Gun.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="477" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8289" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-1-300x204.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Brass empties go flying as Jim Frigiola function tests the ULTIMAX in full auto. This highly controllable squad automatic weapon is another of Jim Sullivan’s excellent designs.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Big Boys</strong><br><br>These relatively small weapons were followed by several big and spectacular .50 caliber sniper rifles, grouped near the center of the range and all mounting various types of night sights. Mark Westrom cut loose with his AR-50, Jim Owens touched off the FN-PGM, and Ronnie Barrett pumped out a few from his semiauto M82A1. All of these guns use a backward-deflecting muzzle device to help tame recoil and reduce the enemy’s ability to detect muzzle flash and report. Well, as dramatic as this is on firing in daylight when the dust and grass goes flying, you ain’t seen nothing until you stand behind and to one side of these shoulder cannons at night. Wow!</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="492" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8290" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-3-300x211.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Ronnie Barrett himself, the rifle’s designer and builder, taking aim through a day scope during the afternoon’s function testing and zeroing activities. That’s a SIMRAD night sight on top.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="471" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8291" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-2.jpg 471w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-2-202x300.jpg 202w" sizes="(max-width: 471px) 100vw, 471px" /><figcaption><em>Jim Owens of FNH USA explains the inner workings of the crisp trigger mechanism on the 7.62mm version of the FN-PGM Precision sniper rifle to 1LT Mike Dunaway of the Arkansas National Guard.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="477" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8292" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-1-300x204.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The 7.62mm version of the FN-PGM Precision sniper rifle is a finely machined bolt action weapon that is capable of astonishing accuracy.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="477" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8293" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-1-300x204.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The 7.62mm version of the FN-PGM Precision sniper rifle is a finely machined bolt action weapon that is capable of astonishing accuracy.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Nowhere to Hide</strong><br><br>Well, nearly an hour after it was really, really dark, the night sight guys on the far end of the firing line had their turn and nearly perfect conditions. Moonrise wasn’t going to happen for a while and a crosswind was blowing clouds of smoke from numerous tracer-induced grass fires to completely obscure most targets from 300 yards on back. This is bad news for image intensifiers but just right for thermal imagers. Recent advances in the technologies of thermal imaging including micro-cooling and reduced power consumption have made these previously heavy, bulky and temperamental devices much more practical and affordable for wider use on small arms systems.<br><br>Jim Looby and the FLIR team had set up a table with computer and television screens right at the spectator barrier so the crowd could look at real-time color video output from the TIPS-HPC thermal sight mounted on a bolt action rifle. This got really dramatic when the rifle was fired and spectators watching the video screen could see sparks from the bullet’s impact on metal targets.<br><br>Raytheon was right next door, similarly feeding the output of a tripod-mounted AN/PAS-13 into table top video screens. This gave onlookers a great thermal image picture of whatever it was downrange that anybody was firing on at any given time.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="540" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8294" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-1-300x231.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>First Look at the HK P2000 Pistol</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>First Look at the HK P2000 Pistol</strong><br><br>Jim Schatz, Director of Federal Operations for Heckler &amp; Koch’s American office, brought along the brand new P2000 semiauto pistol for display at NDIA Small Arms 2001. We caught up with him on the range at Camp Robinson where he was preparing to function test and zero the P2000 along with several other weapons in advance of the evening’s live fire demonstrations. Jim was nice enough to give me a few minutes alone with this interesting new handgun so I could take the detailed pictures seen here, and then he did a little shooting for action views.</p>



<p>Surprisingly slim despite having a 13 round magazine, the P2000 was created at the request of Germany’s federal police for reduced size and weight with greater operational simplicity and human engineered for higher hit probability. Purposely eliminated is any specific mechanical safety that slows getting off that very important first shot. Its innovative double-action-only mechanism can be set in “semi-cocked” mode for a smooth, relatively light trigger release on the first squeeze. Subsequent shots are even lighter and faster as the recoiling slide fully cocks the exposed hammer with each round fired. A polymer recoil absorber and improvements on the classic Browning locking system also contribute to smooth and low-shock blowback operation.<br><br>Ergonomics of its ribbed and rough-textured polymer frame and machined steel slide are noteworthy, with all surfaces comfortably rounded and no angular protrusions to hang up when pulling it out of a holster, handbag or shirt. Different sized hands are easily accommodated by a selection of interchangeable back straps and the double stack magazine floorplate comes with or without a last finger extension. Grooves and slots in the frame accept a wide range of tactical accessories like laser pointers or mini-lights.<br><br>Both the slide catch lever and mag release are ambidextrous for easy operation and a red insert on the extractor serves splendidly as a chamber loaded warning indicator. The fixed square “U” notch rear sight and post front are marked by big white dots for low light shooting.<br><br><strong>P2000 Technical Specifications</strong><br><br>Caliber: 9 x 19mm, 13 rounds capacity<br>System of Operation: Recoil, modified Browning locking system<br>Overall Length: 178 mm<br>Barrel Length: 92mm<br>Sight Radius: 140mm<br>Height &amp; Width: 128 x 34mm<br>Weight: 620 grams unloaded<br><br><strong>2002</strong><br><br>Military, industry and law enforcement and government professionals who need to keep up with the latest in weapons technology are encouraged to join the National Defense Industrial Association and attend the 2001 International Infantry &amp; Small Arms Symposium and Exhibition. This is currently scheduled for 13-16 May 2002 in Atlantic City, NJ, but up-to-the-minute information and registration is available at www.ndia.org or write to NDIA, 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22201.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TUNNEL WEAPON: THE BANG IN THE DARK</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/tunnel-weapon-the-bang-in-the-dark/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Dockery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Kevin Dockery During the Vietnam War, the United States fought the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army forces with some of the most high-tech weapons the US could produce. These weapons were used in against some of the most low-tech forces the US military had faced in a long time. The arena of combat [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Kevin Dockery</strong><br><br><em>During the Vietnam War, the United States fought the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army forces with some of the most high-tech weapons the US could produce. These weapons were used in against some of the most low-tech forces the US military had faced in a long time. The arena of combat ranged from swamps to mountain highlands, from the water to the land. It even extended from the air above North Vietnam to the ground underneath South Vietnam.</em></p>



<p>One of the first major US search-and-destroy operations, where troops went out and tried to hunt down and exterminate the VC in their strongholds northwest of Saigon, was called OPERATION CRIMP. Beginning in early January, 1966, US and allied troops were almost immediately ambushed and fired on by an enemy who disappeared as suddenly as he had first made himself known. The means of this military magic was discovered by a US Army sergeant when he sat on a nail that was sticking up from a hidden trapdoor.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="554" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8299" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-12-300x237.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Tunnel Weapon 5-2.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The sergeant’s painful discovery was the first uncovering of the tunnel complexes of the Viet Cong. Tunnels dug into the root-sewn red clay soil could extend only a short distance, or be a part of huge, multilevel, underground complexes that would extend for miles. There was only one way to find out just what was in the tunnels &#8211; a soldier had to go down into the dark and search them.<br><br>Army dogs didn’t work to search the tunnels, they were killed by unseen traps too quickly. So a new type of American soldier had to come out from the ranks to face the VC in the new arena. Tunnel Rat was the term that was quickly coined for these generally small-stature soldiers who would go down the holes. Like green ferrets, Tunnel Rats would go into the dark, forbidding tunnels and discover whatever might be there.<br><br>Lurking in the warren of dark, hot, humid, tunnels, the tunnel rats might find boobytraps, snakes, venomous insects, weapons caches, or a weapon in the hands of a very live VC. One thing that the tunnel rats were always sure they could find underground &#8211; a quick death.<br><br>Tunnel entrances were often little more than an 18-inch square camouflaged wooden trapdoor. Through this trapdoor would go a tunnel rat equipped with a flashlight, handgun, knife, and bravery.<br><br>The subterranean world of the tunnel rat was made up of tunnels dug through soil that was described by an engineer as being like natural, reinforced concrete. According to the Viet Cong plans the tunnels were no smaller than 0.8 meters or greater than 1.2 meters wide. Ceilings were no greater than 1.8 meters high, and much more often closer to the minimum 0.8 meters high. But the larger tunnels were usually in the deeper layers of the complex. The areas usually searched by the tunnel rats were often little more than 30-inch wide tubes cut through the sticky earth.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="379" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-14.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8300" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-14.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-14-300x162.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>QSPR Round Cut-away Drawing.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The M1911A1 Colt .45 automatic was the general handgun used by the tunnel rats during their early explorations. But the sound of the big .45 going off in the close confines of a tunnel was deafening. The M1911A1 was also considered too big and too cumbersome as well as being too loud.<br><br>Revolvers were chosen by a number of tunnel rats as their search techniques became more sophisticated through experience. The .38 revolver was relatively small, light, and easy to handle. In addition, the Smith and Wesson or Colt weapons available could handle the dirt and muck of the tunnel environment easily, and a second shot in case of a misfire was only a trigger pull away.<br><br>In the condensed world of the tunnel rat, even the M2 carbine with a folding stock was nicknamed “The Cannon.” IN general, pistol suppressors were not available, and when they were, the tunnel rats found them to be long and made their handguns ungainly.<br><br>A tunnel exploration kit was developed in 1966 by the Limited Warfare Laboratory (LWL). The communications system in the kit didn’t work well. The cap-mounted lamp slid around and either was pointing the wrong way, slipped down over the tunnel rat’s eyes, or gave the VC an aiming point that was almost guaranteed to be fatal.<br><br>The weapon in the kit was a .38 Special Smith &amp; Wesson Model 10 (M&amp;P) revolver with a 4-inch barrel, a small high-intensity aiming light and a muzzle mounted suppressor. The hip-holster issued with the weapon was very hard to draw from in the tight confines of a tunnel. The revolver was huge with its aiming light and muzzle can. And even with a tight cylinder gap, the suppressor didn’t reduce the sound of the shot enough to be worth the trouble.<br><br>The designers back at the LWL probably hadn’t had a lot of faith in the revolver suppressor as well, they issued ear plugs in the kit to be used when firing underground. The Tunnel Exploration Kit was abandoned in service, most tunnel rats wanted nothing to do with it, and it was quickly withdrawn.<br><br>By 1969, subterranean combat in the tunnels of South Vietnam had been refined by time and experience. The tunnel rats knew what worked for them and were exceedingly conservative in adopting any new hardware or weapons. It was in July 1969 that ten of possibly the rarest modern US military handgun ever made arrived in Vietnam.<br><br>Earlier, in December, 1967, the U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MAC-V) had recognized that the need still existed for a low-noise weapon for what were now officially called the tunnel exploration personnel in the Republic of Vietnam. The tunnel rats had been using a variety of weapons since the suppressed S&amp;W fiasco eighteen months earlier. Some tunnel rats had competent armorers and machinists make up suppressors for a variety of handguns, including several for the M1911A1. But the big .45 didn’t operate dependably with a simple muzzle can, though any sound suppression given the big pistol was well liked by the rats who didn’t mind its size.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8301" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-11-300x200.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>QSPR Ammo Can. <strong>Photo courtesy Rick Larson Collection.</strong></em></figcaption></figure>



<p>A few of the OSS-ordered WWII era suppressed High Standard HD .22 automatics made they way into Tunnel Rat hands. But these weapons were very few in number and wanted by a number of other special units. Personal weapons were used by the rats, ranging from .25 caliber automatics to sawed-off shotguns. MAC-V looked at some of these field improvisations and added their characteristics to their request for a new weapon.<br><br>To increase hit probability in the dark tunnels, ammunition for the new weapons would be of the multiple-projectile type. A spread of shot would be much easier with when the target may only be visible for a fraction of a second, or maybe not visible at all. Since the tunnel combat was by nature at a short range, the weapon was to be lethal at 25 feet, minimum. Basically, MAC-V wanted a small, handheld, suppressed shotgun for the tunnel rats.<br><br>The Army LWL passed on the project to a qualified civilian contractor, Aircraft Armaments Inc. (AAI) of Baltimore, Maryland. AAI had been working for a number of years on various applications of captured piston and expanding capsule (teleshot) technology for both the military as well as NASA and the aerospace industry. The company’s experience with firearms had them quickly applying the captured piston concept to the tunnel weapon project.<br><br>In the captured piston system, propellant gases from normal smokeless powder drives a piston pushing a payload down a cylinder with one open end. When the gas-driven piston strikes a constriction at the open end of the cylinder, it is trapped and held in place. The payload continues away from the cylinder, moving at what can be a significant velocity.<br><br>The captured piston seals off the end of the cylinder, trapping the propellant gases inside the system where they can bleed off slowly. With no propellant gases escaping violently, muzzle blast, flash, and the resulting noise, is reduced considerably. Exchange a steel cartridge case for the open-ended cylinder, and a plastic capsule full of shot for the payload, and you have the heart of the tunnel weapon.<br><br>The “muzzle velocity” of the projectile, in this case the shot charge, is dependent only on the length of travel and pressure pushing the internal piston of the round. A sealed-in percussion primer ignites the propellant charge in a normal way. Heavy threads at the muzzle end of the cartridge slow and stop the piston as it shears through them. The capsule continues out the barrel of the weapon and breaks up on hitting the resistance of the air, releasing its shot charge.<br><br>To increase the lethality of the shot charge, heavy metal shot was used instead of the usual lead shot. Sintered tungsten-steel alloy shot was formed under pressure for the subprojectiles. The sintered-metal technology involved compressing powdered alloy in a die between two punches and gave the shot a noticeable belt in its center, topped by two hemispherical ends. The shot looked much like a round ball with a band around the center.<br><br>To fire the new ammunition, a revolver system was used to eliminate any problems with trying to function a semiautomatic weapon. To maximize available space for the ammunition design, the largest commercially-available revolver design was chosen for development into the tunnel weapon. The revolver decided on was the Smith &amp; Wesson Model 29, .44 Magnum.<br><br>The .44 magnum barrel was removed and a simple short cylinder threaded into its place. The stub barrel had a 0.400 smooth bore reamed through its center. The extractor rod of the revolver was cut back to just in front of the end of the muzzle. Outside of the barrel, the main mechanism of the revolver was little changed outside of the cylinder.<br><br>Each chamber of the .44 magnum Model 29 cylinder was reamed out to 0.528 inches straight for its entire length. Over 2.75 ounces of steel were removed from the cylinders that originally weighed over half a pound. This gave the cylinder walls of the tunnel weapon enough strength to function and carry the ammunition, and that was about all. But since the steel cartridge case itself held the pressure of the propellant gases, the cylinder walls could safely be made very thin.<br><br>An additional coil spring was placed near the top of the mainspring to give the hammer additional power to hit the slightly recessed primers of the special ammunition. The precision sights of the Model 29 were useless with the new ammunition and the rear sight was removed, leaving a square slot in the top of the revolver for rough aiming if desired.<br><br>When fired, the new ammunition gave out little more than low-intensity sparks. The blast and noise of a normal revolver shot was almost completely eliminated. The 15-pellet load gave the revolver the shot spread of a very open .410 shotgun.<br><br>The ammunition did have an unusual safety problem inherent in its design. The round didn’t have to be in a barrel or cylinder to have a lethal velocity if fired. In case of a round going off from heat or a blow, the shot would be moving at the same 750 foot per second velocity it would have if fired from the weapon. To insure safety in storage, special 1/8 inch thick steel liners were put in the ammunition cans holding the tunnel weapon ammunition. If the rounds went off in a fire or other mishap, at least the pellets wouldn’t leave the ammunition can.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="577" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8302" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-12-300x247.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Tunnel Weapon #11. This is an AAI Shop gun. It is the only non-issue example we are aware of. It is seen here with an aftermarket grip.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The shot from what was now called the Quiet, Special Purpose Revolver, would penetrate a 3/4 inch thick sheet of plywood at 15 feet. This was later used as part of the demonstration of the weapon to its users in Vietnam. In July, 1969, ten Tunnel Weapons and 992 rounds of ammunition arrived in Vietnam for testing.<br><br>Five of the new weapons and 496 rounds of ammunition were each issued to the 1st and 25th Infantry Divisions for a 90-day field test period. On 22 August, 5 Tunnel Weapons and 125 rounds of ammunition were transferred from the 1st Infantry Division to the Americal Division for the balance of the testing period. Training time for the new weapons ranged from none to several hours, but it usually always included a firing demonstration at the recommended plywood target.<br><br>Accuracy was reasonable with the new weapons. One user could hit a flying sparrow at 20 meters with a single shot. But that marksman was very much the exception. Most users trained for an hour or less with the new weapons, firing 30 or fewer rounds each during the session.<br><br>Acceptance of the new weapon was limited by the very conservative tunnel rats. But within weeks of their arrival in Vietnam, the tunnel weapons were being carried in their special shoulder holsters into the tunnels of Vietnam.<br><br>The “silent” quality of the tunnel weapon gave some of the users questions regarding its lethality. During one tunnel mission, a sergeant with the 25th Division demonstrated the effect the tunnel weapon had on human targets.<br><br>While slipping through a tunnel complex, the sergeant crawled around a corner and met face to face with an NVA soldier; “The NVA was sitting and just as surprised as me, but I was able to fire the Tunnel Weapon&#8230;. before he could use his rifle. I drug him outside but he was dead.”<br><br>In another incident, a sergeant armed with a Tunnel Weapon took out a VC outside of a tunnel. “I shot him coming out of a bunker. He was running, and he was about 20 to 25 feet away.”<br><br>The shot load of the Tunnel Weapon was effective but it didn’t have the stopping power of a regular bullet. A number of other encounters with VC and NVA troops in tunnels resulted in wounded and disabled enemy forces, but they were not killed by the shot load of the Tunnel Weapon.<br><br>The steel cartridge cases also had some problems with the recessed primer system. The steel firing pin of the revolver didn’t always strike the primer solidly enough for it to go off. This resulted in a high (18 percent) failure to fire rate on the first weapons. The firing pin was replaced in-country with a harder metal one, and the ammunition primer redesigned. But the very conservative tunnel rats never liked or trusted the tunnel weapon completely. What they had been using for several years had worked for them and they were still alive. That was enough.<br><br>But another group of US forces liked the tunnel weapon &#8211; a lot. The 25th Infantry Division issued their Tunnel Weapons also to members of one of their reconnaissance and Intelligence platoons as well as to its Ranger company and infantry companies. The Americal Division used its Tunnel Weapons with its Ranger and Infantry companies. This put the tunnel weapons to use in ambushes, prisoner snatches, and other more covert actions.<br><br>The Tunnel Weapon was found to be ideal for ambushes, especially at night. Enemy soldiers were killed at ranges of less than ten feet with other troops nearby never hearing the shots. Comments on the weapons from these users included;<br><br>“If we had five such pistols we could stay out for a week at a time&#8230;without ever giving our position away.”<br><br>“That pistol is the most magnificent weapon I ever seen in action. I could use three of these in my platoon. The pistol doesn’t make any noise louder than a cap pistol. It hits the target just by using the pointing method. I never aimed the weapon. This weapon is far by being better than a .38 pistol we had. It’s more accurate, it’s very quiet, and it handles better than any other pistol I’ve handled.”<br><br>“For our use it works real good. We have to avoid contact and the weapon doesn’t compromise our position. For our platoon we could use five or six of these weapons.”<br><br>There were some suggestions made for improving the weapon, and especially the ammunition. The primer pocket was redesigned and that eliminated a lot of the misfire problems. But besides its use in 1969, the Tunnel Weapon was never fielded again in any numbers after the evaluation period. Only the ten examples, and a single specimen maintained by AAI, were ever made. Two of these are at the US Ordnance Museum at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Specimen #5 is on public display there and the AAI specimen is there in storage.<br><br>On a very odd note, one of the Tunnel Weapons was reported lost in Vietnam. This weapon was later recovered in California where it had been used as a suppressed weapon in a murder. Almost no live specimens of the ammunition exists, especially not in private hands. The captured-piston ammunition for the Tunnel Weapon and other systems has been declared a suppressor by BATF.<br><br><strong>QSPR (TUNNEL WEAPON) TECHNICAL DATA UNIT # 5</strong><br>OVERALL LENGTH &#8211; 6.75 inches<br>BARREL LENGTH &#8211; 1.372 inches<br>BORE DIAMETER &#8211; 0.400 inches<br>WEIGHT (EMPTY) &#8211; 2.01 pounds<br>WEIGHT (LOADED) &#8211; 2.37 pounds<br>WEIGHT (CYLINDER) &#8211; 0.419 pounds<br><br><strong>AMMUNITION</strong><br>CASE DIAMETER &#8211; 0.526 inch<br>RIM DIAMETER &#8211; 0.550 inch<br>ROUND LENGTH &#8211; 1.866 inches<br>ROUND WEIGHT &#8211; 0.971 ounces (27.5 grams)<br>PROJECTILE &#8211; 3 piece plastic sabot containing 15 tungsten-steel alloy shot<br>    PELLET DIAMETER &#8211; 0.147 inch (belt)<br>    PELLET WEIGHT &#8211; 7.5 grains (each)<br>MUZZLE VELOCITY &#8211; 750 fps<br>EFFECTIVE RANGE &#8211; 50 feet<br>MAXIMUM RANGE &#8211; 1,400 feet<br>SOUND LEVEL &#8211; 120 Decibels at 1 meter from muzzle</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HK&#8217;S MG43: TORTURE TEST AT THE CIBOLA DUST RANGE</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cibola Dust Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoner 63]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Dan Shea In previous issues of SAR, your faithful correspondent has brought out the stories of the Yuma Proving Ground torture tests performed by HK on their new weapons. Oberndorf would not dream of presenting a new weapon system without adequate testing and trials. The Germans do not like to present an unproven concept [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Dan Shea</strong><br><br><em>In previous issues of SAR, your faithful correspondent has brought out the stories of the Yuma Proving Ground torture tests performed by HK on their new weapons. Oberndorf would not dream of presenting a new weapon system without adequate testing and trials. The Germans do not like to present an unproven concept to their customers. This means they beat the hell out of their systems, trying to make them fail. Other manufacturers do this as well, but far too many end up going to the marketplace with either untested or inadequately tested product, and in the military small arms arena, this can be fatal for your customers. Aside from the natural pride HK has in their quality, those surviving customers tend to be annoyed by these incidents, and to take it out on the manufacturer, so thorough testing is prudent.</em></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="472" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8309" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-13-300x202.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Martin Stussak wishing the ammo hadn’t run out. Martin is famous for firing the 40x53mm HK Grenade Machine Gun from a standing sling support position.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In August of 2001, HK did their desert testing of the new MG43 machine gun system in 5.56 x 45mm. As usual, this was a torture test of the testers as well as the weapons. The 116º f ambient temperature does not begin to describe the actual temperatures out in the noonday sun. The dust and sand is everywhere, gets into everything, and is a great environment for finding out where the weak points in a system are. We did not find many in the MG43. There were far more weak points in your faithful correspondent than in anything that HK tested on the Cibola Dust Range those weeks in August of 2001.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="492" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-15.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8308" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-15.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-15-300x211.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>HK Federal Operations (and SAR Usual Suspect) Jim Schatz pours the rounds from the MG43 downrange during the testing.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The United States is not the only country that has requirements for a lightweight belt fed weapon. While this writer is a dyed in the wool, true believer, old school (Readers may insert more clichés) curmudgeon on the caliber issue- I believe that a machine gun should be in 30 caliber in order to perform all of the functions that a machine gunner needs it to do out to 1200 meters +, there is definitely a demonstrated need for an intermediate belt fed weapon. After Action reports (Yes, those modern day “Lessons Learned” reports) have demonstrated at what short ranges most modern combat happens at, and emphasizes the need for a lightweight, portable, reliable belt fed weapon in a 5.56 caliber, allowing each squad to have a belt fed operator. To this point in time, the FN Minimi / M249 system has been the predominant offering, accepted in many armies around the world. There have been other offerings ranging from the well known HK23 series, to the famed Stoner 63, to the mysterious Israeli Negev, to the very sexy but totally unreliable Spanish Cetme Ameli. I love that Ameli’s miniature MG42 looks, but wouldn’t want to bet the farm on it.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8310" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-12-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Oddly enough, the ammunition used in the test was marked for the Navy’s Mk 23 Mod 0, which is the final form of the Stoner 63A machine gun. The MK23 links provided a “Pitch” that is the same as the modern M249 utilizes, so there is no issue of link distancing in this situation. Older “S63” links for the original Stoner 63s had a different pitch and could cause feed problems in modern weapons.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8311" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-13-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The magazine hanger utilizes standard M249 feed boxes. The MG43 is also designed to be mounted on the US M2/ M122 tripod system.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Lately, there have been many more requirements written, reaching for ever lighter weight, and ever more reliable and ergonomic designs. Some of these have moved into the 30 caliber range &#8211; 7.62 x 51mm NATO- and there are presently trials that SAR will be bringing you updates on. However, the current offering is in 5.56 x 45 mm NATO.<br><br>In this present requirement, the German firm of HK GmbH in Oberndorf has been working on a new weapon, the MG43. SAR was given an early look at this interesting and innovative weapon last year. We were asked to keep this quiet until the new system was unveiled at the NDIA Small Arms Symposium in May of 2002. I have chosen to present the features of this weapon as a photo essay in the issue that will be at the NDIA, and if you read through the captions and look at the photos, you will get a working view of this new design.<br><br>HK has taken some things from the old, and added a lot of new features. The goal of the German designers has been to make an extremely reliable system, as usual. And they have succeeded, as usual.<br><br>For our testing, the Germans fired 102,000 rounds of US Milspec 5.56x 45 ammunition. There were minor glitches here and there, but the two guns made it through the tests in one piece. It was most amazing to watch the testing cycle- fire a belt, toss the barrel into a barrel of water, slap another barrel on the gun, load a belt, and repeat. Endlessly. The barrels stood up to the rapid temperature changes, as did the MG43 system.<br><br>I observed the firers for quite a while to determine the controllability issue- and the MG43 was easy to handle. This is a subjective part of the report- what’s it like to shoot it? Well, the 750rpm cyclic rate is smooth for the weapon, an appropriate compromise between what the end users want for burst hit probability, and what is probably the natural harmonic of the weapon- I suspect it to be just above 500 rpm. I found it to be very easy to control, and keeping on target was quite easy. A negative would have to be the flash hider- it was opened at the bottom, I immediately went to bipod supported prone position and in that sandy environment it raised a cloud of dust- however, HK has corrected that situation. Shoulder fire was relatively easy to accomplish and the ambush busting “Hip fire” was easy to control as well. (God save me if Peter K reads this and thinks I advocate “Hip Fire”).<br><br>Please read through the accompanying picture captions for a better view of the HK MG43 machine gun. I am certain that we will be hearing a lot more about this new offering.- Dan</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-8.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="375" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-8.jpg" alt="" data-id="8313" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-8.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/005-8-5/#main" class="wp-image-8313" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-8.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-8-300x161.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color"><strong>MG43 buttstock with wire shoulder support extended. This is a simple lightweight wire support, sufficient to do the job of adding the third leg of the “Tripod” in bipod supported prone firing.</strong></span></em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-5.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="504" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-5.jpg" alt="" data-id="8314" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-5.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/006-5-4/#main" class="wp-image-8314" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-5-300x216.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The rear of the buttstock swings down after pressing through the captured pin, exposing the storage area for the cleaning kit.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-5.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="467" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-5.jpg" alt="" data-id="8315" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-5.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/007-5-4/#main" class="wp-image-8315" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-5.jpg 467w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-5-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 467px) 100vw, 467px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The buttstock is a folding stock set up, with a side hinge.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-5.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="292" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-5.jpg" alt="" data-id="8316" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-5.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/008-5-5/#main" class="wp-image-8316" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-5-300x125.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The recoil guide rod supports the recoil/ return spring, which is double wire wound. This system is basically used to overcome “Spring surge”- the double wind keeps the pressure constant and reliable. The side folding stock precludes a buffer in the stock, and a flat wound buffer spring is used for bolt contact at the rear. This feature is in common with the Minimi, prior to the newer M249 Hydraulic style buffers.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-4.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="560" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-4.jpg" alt="" data-id="8317" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-4.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/009-4-5/#main" class="wp-image-8317" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-4.jpg 560w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-4-240x300.jpg 240w" sizes="(max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The bolt body rides in the carrier, and the cam rides in its path. On forward travel, the bolt is in what appears in these photos as the extended position. When the assembly is all of the way forward, the bolt has been retracted and rotated into the assembly, locking the lugs securely into the firing position. The firing pin can not reach the primer of the cartridge until this distance has been completely closed and the lugs are locked. As the bolt carrier begins its move to the rear, the bolt stays locked up until the cam turns the locking lugs out of the trunion.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-3.jpg" alt="" data-id="8318" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-3.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/010-3-5/#main" class="wp-image-8318" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-3-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">Internal picture of the MG43 cover showing the feed mechanism. This mechanism is robust, and set up for maximum transfer of energy in feeding- the result is an impressive belt lift ability. Note- on the left of the photo, the round in tray indicator mechanism.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="467" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-2.jpg" alt="" data-id="8319" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-2.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/011-2-5/#main" class="wp-image-8319" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-2.jpg 467w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-2-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 467px) 100vw, 467px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The “Round in Tray” indicator. Note the white button that is either visible, or tactile (Run your finger over it to tell), which rises when a round is in the feed tray and presented to the actual feed position.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="481" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-2.jpg" alt="" data-id="8320" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-2.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/012-2-5/#main" class="wp-image-8320" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-2-300x206.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">A new HK Lower to watch out for? Not really, this is a dedicated lower that is only for the MG43, it is ambidextrous, Safe &#8211; Fire only, and utilizes a vertical sear notch- operating rod block system for controlling bolt release. Placement of the safety lever is ergonomic- readily accessible to the operator’s thumb, and reasonably quiet to operate.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-2.jpg" alt="" data-id="8321" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-2.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/013-2-5/#main" class="wp-image-8321" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-2-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">MG43 massive double bolt lugs, showing the advantage of the flat surface face on the barrel- the bolt has gone back to lock up on the receiver trunion, removing questions of headspace on the quick change barrels from the equation.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="438" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-2.jpg" alt="" data-id="8322" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-2.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/014-2-5/#main" class="wp-image-8322" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/014-2-300x188.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The business end of the Bolt Carrier Assembly/ Operating Rod. The two open areas in the center are for weight reduction. There are two sear notches on the lower section to ensure against a runaway gun due to weak ammunition or a sluggish mechanism. Instead of a solid rail on the carrier side, there are two machined lugs on each side, that ride in the receiver, and keep alignment and support, as well as avoiding dirt problems in the receiver. As a side effect, this also lightens the system by not having a continuous rail. The camming path for unlocking the bolt lugs is obvious, and the roller at the top operates the feeding lever in the top cover. It is allows the top cover to close with the bolt forward or to the rear.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/015.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/015.jpg" alt="" data-id="8323" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/015.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/015-12/#main" class="wp-image-8323" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/015.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/015-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The gas block takes off pressurized gas in a fairly standard method, and the cup type piston driving the operating rod to the rear is fairly standard as well. What is not standard today is that HK’s design does not require any gas adjustments by the operator. Note the fold down front sight.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/016.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="982" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/016.jpg" alt="" data-id="8324" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/016.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/016-10/#main" class="wp-image-8324" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/016.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/016-214x300.jpg 214w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The fold up cocking handle was convenient and robust, folding up out of the way for storage or carry, while maintaining the strength necessary for a combat weapon.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/017.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="389" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/017.jpg" alt="" data-id="8325" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/017.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/017-12/#main" class="wp-image-8325" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/017.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/017-300x167.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">MG43 bolt disassembled</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/018.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/018.jpg" alt="" data-id="8326" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/018.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/018-8/#main" class="wp-image-8326" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/018.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/018-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">Barrel release mechanism is a simple lever, standard design.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/020.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="671" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/020.jpg" alt="" data-id="8312" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/020.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/020-7/#main" class="wp-image-8312" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/020.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/020-300x288.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">Jim Schatz firing one of his trademark five hundred round bursts with the belt layed out in the sand. Jim does these up to one thousand round sets to not only demonstrate the reliability of the mechanism- we all know that this type of fire is not good for air cooled machine guns- but to demonstrate the effectiveness of the belt feed. One of the gremlins of machine gun design is taking the energy of the recoiling action, and applying that to pulling the weight of a belt of ammunition. HK has been particularly successful at this in other designs, and the MG43 is no exception.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/019.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="670" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/019.jpg" alt="" data-id="8327" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/019.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2002/06/01/hks-mg43-torture-test-at-the-cibola-dust-range/019-7/#main" class="wp-image-8327" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/019.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/019-300x287.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><strong><em><span class="has-inline-color has-luminous-vivid-amber-color">The MG43 bipod is made from strong tubular steel, with extendable legs and it will either fold up to the rear into the forend, or to the front when used with a tripod mount. The support is strong enough to be a forward grip for the forward assault position- a controversial shooting position that should only be used for jobs like ambush breaking- but the machine gunner should know how to do it. Sling on over shoulder, left hand on left bipod, right hand on grip, and pour the fire into the enemy position. Other than that, doctrine should be the bipod supported prone position in all possible opportunities. This bipod is robust and does the job.</span></em></strong></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p><strong>HK MG43 Machine Gun Specifications<br><br></strong>Caliber: 5.56 x 45mm NATO<br>Operating System: Gas Operated<br>Bolt system: Positively locked, rotary two lug bolt head<br>Mode of fire: Sustained fire<br>Rate of fire: 750 Rds/ minute<br>Overall Length: 1050 mm, 810 mm with buttstock closed<br>Width: 90 mm<br>Height- bipod folded:&#8230;.250 mm<br>Barrel Length: 480 mm<br>Weight: 6.4 kg<br>Bipod Weight: 0.43 kg<br>Barrel Weight: 1.72 kg<br>Standard Sights: Adjustable rear sight with range marks from 100 to 1000 meters in 100 meter increments.<br>Optical Sights: Picatinny rails on the top cover allow for the installation of various day and night sights.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘FREEDOM AND SEVEN SPANISH ANGELS’: KNOB CREEK RANGE FALL 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/freedom-and-seven-spanish-angels-knob-creek-range-fall-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9 (Jun 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Bodron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knob Creek Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Cartledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Rick CartledgePhotos by Bob Bodron Wednesday I rolled northward toward Knob Creek on I-24. Tennessee Troopers and the FBI detoured traffic around the bus crash caused by a knife wielding maniac. With his throat slashed, driver Sanford Sims valiantly tried to steer his bus to save his passengers. He ran out of road before [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Rick Cartledge</strong><br>Photos by <strong>Bob Bodron</strong><br><br>Wednesday I rolled northward toward Knob Creek on I-24. Tennessee Troopers and the FBI detoured traffic around the bus crash caused by a knife wielding maniac. With his throat slashed, driver Sanford Sims valiantly tried to steer his bus to save his passengers. He ran out of road before he could save them all. Two weeks later on the square in Marietta, Georgia many thanked Mr. Sims for his heroic effort and the many lives that he did save.<br><br>As I rolled up to the motel, Forbes Mathews and Doug Hollberg rolled in beside me. Doug said, ‘They’re confiscating all surplus military equipment.’ The reply came, ‘They’ll take my C-drum from my cold dead hands.’ Doug said, ‘C-drums weren’t used in war.’ The reply came, ‘Tell that to the Cork Brigade.’ When the kidding about a bill in the House that could lead to the possible confiscation or demilling of any prior US military gear subsided, we got some steaks and a good night’s sleep. We rolled into Knob Creek Range very early on Thursday morning.<br><br><strong>Let Freedom Ring</strong><br><br>Doug and Forbes unloaded at the shooting site and set up the black plastic that identified ‘The Black Mariah’ shooting spot. I bought six Knob Creek shirts and returned to the vehicle to secure them. In the parking lot I ran into Jim Ballou. Jim smiled broadly as he told of the continuing success of his landmark book ‘Rock in a Hard Place; The Browning Automatic Rifle’. Jim had brought extra copies to autograph for his many readers. Not far from Jim’s parking place I also ran into Folke Myrvang. News from Blake Stephens at Collector Grade Publications states that Mr. Myrvang’s much anticipated book on the MG-34 and MG-42 will be on sale as you read this. Check the Long Mountain Outfitters web page or magazine ads for details on both of these fine books.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="542" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-14.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8334" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-14.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-14-300x232.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>This roaring MP-5 reminds us to never count out the ladies at KCR!</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Next, I contacted two prominent national ammunition distributors. First and foremost, a question needed an answer. Two days after September 11, most retail stores listed their supplies of 9mm, 223, 308, and short Russian as ‘sold out’. About the ‘shortage’, both ammunition distributors said the same thing. Ammunition arrives in a constant supply. No shortage existed. September 11 caused a temporary surge in buying. With several more shipments, both the flow and price will returned to normal. One of them stated, ‘I could have sold out of 762&#215;39 early last week. I saved some and brought it to the Creek, knowing that the shooters would need it.’ This writer picked up some 762&#215;39 from him and a stack of Radway .303 from another. By Sunday, I had put all of the brass on the ground.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8335" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-16-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Forbes Mathews launches projectiles down range and floods the ground with brass from his ‘98 Maxim.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Those who have not come to the Creek might think that there would be changes. This writer observed only two. First, each day at 8 o’clock in the morning the loud speaker played The Star Spangled Banner. During the time of its playing, one literally could have heard a pin drop. Second, an impressive number of new faces showed up at Knob Creek. Some of them made serious purchases in the Pole Barn. The world may change. Knob Creek remains Knob Creek.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8336" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-13-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A BREN gun belches some mighty fire on an October afternoon at KCR.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>As additional evidence of how Knob Creek remains constant, we relate the following. Two days after the treacherous attacks on American cities, The History Channel ran an all day marathon of ‘Tales of the Gun’. This writer had the privilege of contributing to several of the programs. During the weekend at KCR, literally more than three hundred people thanked me, Lamar Cheatham, Forbes Mathews, Dr. Ed Weitzman, and Doug Hollberg for our contributions to ‘Tales of the Gun’. Upon returning home, I telephoned Greystone Productions and spoke with Producer Andrew Nock. I asked him to pass on to Executive Producer Louis Tarantino and Producer/Director Tom Jennings the many kind remarks from KCR. We have always been proud of our work. On those three days, we felt particularly proud of the work and humbled by the heartfelt response.<br><br><strong>Pole Barn Adventures with the Usual Suspects&#8230;</strong><br><br>Before the Pole Barn opened on Friday morning, I dropped by the Little Fat Guy’s slot for a steaming cup of coffee and some good conversation. Tom Golik, prominent Title 2 from Jacksonville, FL came by and showed off his new Stoner. He gave an open and instantly accepted invitation to come and put some brass on the ground. Meanwhile, the Little Fat Guy’s wife fitted the newest member of their family with small ear muffs and dainty eye protection. When Homer Sailor called the line hot, the Littlest Fat Person sat transfixed in the stroller as the Little Fat Guy emptied a belt for his offspring from his short barreled .50. Some shooters are made, others are born.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-14.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8337" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-14.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-14-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Milton Barnes took some time away from the Metall Werkes tables to empty some belts from an MG-42.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>At 10 o’clock The Pole Barn opened and people flooded in. We all enjoyed the spectacular show. This fall, as in the recent past, the dealers went ‘all out’ to serve their customers. First and foremost to my mind comes the Breda 35.<br><br>Kent Lomont displayed a truly rare and magnificent gun. This writer test fired a Breda 35 about ten years ago at the Creek. I handled one about three years ago that went to the mid West. Both of these guns came in 6.5. Mr. Lomont displayed a beautiful example of an export model Breda 35 made for the Costa Rican Army. This gun came in 7mm. On Thursday afternoon, Mr. Lomont tore down this fine gun in order that several of us could examine the fine workmanship. Though its magazine loading makes it not a great combat weapon, one will find the Breda 35 as well crafted as any and better than most. I told several collectors about this beautiful piece that carried a comparatively modest price tag. The beautiful Breda carried a sold sign by noon on Friday.<br><br>I next went to the tables of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Anagnos, surplus dealers. Weathermen forecast much cooler temperatures on Saturday night. Mrs. Anagnos provided a warm coat from within the huge stacks of camp gear. I then broke out a couple of Tampa cigars. Paul and I smoked these fine cigars in celebration of Cuba’s first freedom fighters. Cuba Libre came to be in the cigar factories of Tampa in the 1880’s (see SAR July ’98). While we talked, Paul introduced Michael Smith of Purvis, MS. Mr. Smith displayed three pistols from his personal collection. I knew someone that all three would interest.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8338" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-9.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-9-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Many flocked to view this rare quad 50 mount in action on the Knob Creek firing line.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>I took the news to an astute collector and dealer on the other side of the range. The collector immediately went into the Pole Barn. He emerged a half an hour later with a smile on his face. He stated. ‘The baby Nambu with two magazines and a holster isn’t as pretty as the one I already have, but it is a very pretty gun. The pre 357 Magnum (one of 5500 made between 1935 and 1938) appears to be almost unfired. I bought them both.’ The preceding proves one of the fine points at Knob Creek Range. Though the automatic guns predominate, one may find other unexpected treasures if one looks hard enough.<br><br>While viewing some movie use machine guns at the LMO tables, an interesting encounter took place. Byron Farmer of Milledgeville, GA recognized my North Atlanta accent. When he introduced himself, I recognized his accent from the Fall Line. Mr. Farmer had acquired an Amnesty registered MP-3008 many years ago. The Class 3 dealer brought his early acquisition to Knob Creek Range to find out what it was now worth. I suggested that we wait until Dan Shea could talk with Mr. Farmer. When Dan got free, he examined the weapon. Dan stated, ‘ The stock looks like it is incorrect, but it is not. The Germans made several stock variations and this is one of them. I have handled three of these in the last two years or so. The last two I sold for $8500 and $9500. This Type 1 MP3008 looks like the one that went for $9500.’<br><br>Mr. Farmer and I then went to The Rifleman tables run by Dave and Mark Mann of Macon, GA. Mark enthusiastically showed us part of the large acquisition that they had just made of transferable Title 2s. Then Mark went under the table and brought out their brand new PKM. Now, they hunted ammunition and belts at Knob Creek. Mark manned the tables while Dave took the PKM out for a photograph. He stepped around his DSHK 38/46 and stood for a photograph with their newest acquisition. The preceding offers additional proof to an old adage. At KCR, one never fails to meet new friends and view new things.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="596" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8339" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-6-300x255.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Byron Farmer brought his long ago acquired MP-3008 to KCR and found it was quite rare. </em><br><em><strong>Photo by Rick Cartledge.</strong></em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Meanwhile, some unloading took place at the front of the Pole Barn. Brian Koskey displayed two cannons that he had restored for Kent Lomont. First off the truck came a Swiss 50mm that looked new. Second came a wonderful piece of history, an American 37mm from World War I. The long barreled cannon sat on a narrower and higher mount than the mounts one is used to viewing on the World War II 37s. Brian pointed out the Bethlehem Steel imprint near the breech. Across at Robert Landies’ Ohio Ordnance tables we viewed another unusual piece of heavy ordnance. Mr. Landies proudly showed off the 1918 Maxim 13mm anti tank gun correctly mounted on a Maxim 08/15 bipod. This massive gun looks like an 1898 Mauser that abused a lot of steroids. After the Great War, John Browning would use the 13mm cartridge to invent the American .50 round. He then designed an automatic gun to fire it. Scott McNish, armorer with Ohio Ordnance, set up the photograph that accompanies this article. In the snapshot, Scott holds the 13mm anti tank crossed with a ’98 Mauser to give the reader an idea of scale.<br><br><strong>Ready On The Firing Line</strong><br><br>Before going to the line, I dropped by Jonathan Arthur Ciener’s tables. There Jon displayed his much anticipated ‘Project X’. This project allows all Thompson owners to shoot .22 rounds. The kit comes with a barrel insert, magazine, and bolt works. Jon makes these kits for the 1921, 28, and M-1/M1-A1s. This writer became one of many who signed up for ‘Project X’. Out on the firing line, author James Ballou took ‘Project X’ for a test drive. Mr. Ballou knows considerably more about the BAR. Jim reported flawless function for ‘Project X’.<br><br>More than one invention took a test by fire on Friday. Joe Gaddini of SWR Suppressors introduced Scott Prince of R &amp; D on their new Omega 9mm suppressor. Scott reported that much talk arose from the Friday suppressor competition. First, Scott reported that the Omega demonstrated a 40db reduction dry. Second, the Neilson recoil booster device enabled the Glock weapons to function flawlessly with the Omega suppressor. The CNC aluminum constructed suppressor functioned 12db quieter than any other leading suppressor. As often reported in this magazine, the suppressor wars continue in earnest.<br><br>Stuart Rueben received the transfer on his cannon and immediately took it to the line. Many counted themselves fortunate to view this historic gun. Mr. Rueben showed off the French cannon, serial number 200, on Knob Creek’s main line. America bought these 40mm cannon dated 1892 and converted them from fusee fire to center fire. Mr. Rueben showed off the unusual side breech assembly. He took pleasure in the remarkable condition of this fine gun. Milton Barnes, drum inventor of Metall Werkes and cannoneer of The Bowler Battery, gave some cogent comments about the 40mm. Mr. Barnes stated the gun originally entered service as a true 10lb Parrot. The original shells came as pointed rifle projectiles. Milton then stated the 40mm was, ‘&#8230;a flat shooting, exceptionally nasty piece of ordnance if you happened to be on the receiving end.’<br><br>Saturday afternoon I ran into Valerie with Valkyrie Arms. Valerie brought her production De Lisles to Knob Creek Range and took a number of orders. Her company produces these guns twenty at a time. We went to the firing line to test drive the weapons. The beautifully crafted weapon functions extremely well. A Georgia Emma Gee recently placed an order for one having never seen even a picture of a De Lisle. Suffice it to say that this carbine fires as quiet as a whisper and hits like a Mack truck. Look for a comprehensive article on the De Lisle Carbine in a later issue of SAR.<br><br>Upon arrival at the Black Mariah on Saturday afternoon I found the occupants extremely happy with an acquisition made that morning. Forbes Mathews and Doug Hollberg told of acquiring the final piece of ‘Project 99’. Of the six known kits, a seventh had surfaced. As to whose and where, don’t ask. This kit contains the Chinese converted 7.7 barrel that now fires 762 x 39 and the Chinese made tail piece. Another group in the Midwest independently figured out the tail piece. Back in Georgia, Mike Thacker already has received his 762 x 39 converted 99 barrel. As you read this, two versions of the Chinese conversion already are putting brass on the ground.<br><br>I then went down to visit some Vickers shooters and put my 1600 rounds of Radway on the ground. (It was a dirty job, but someone had to do it.) When Homer Sailor called a cease fire, I ran into Troy Sellars of In Range out of Kodak, TN. The talented Class 2 does a full range of AK to Krinkov conversions and AK SBRs. He showed off his beautifully crafted AK-74 Krink variant. Troy stated that he really like the AK design and the Krinkov innovation. He chose to specialize in these particular weapons. The fine Krinkov underscored his point.<br><br>When Saturday night rolled around, everyone headed toward the main line. Kenny Sumner had added additional viewing stands to give the crowd an even better view of the Night Shoot. Tracer stood as the order of the day. The gunners took the order to heart. The show opened with a helicopter fly over with tracer put down range from an M-60. Then came a tracer burst from the mini-gun. Homer Sailor then called the line hot and the thunder rolled. After each session the crowd broke out in enthusiastic applause. Many viewers moved closer to guns that they wished to view in action. Throughout the evening everything from Gatling guns to a mini-guns poured tracer down range. We all enjoyed a spectacular Saturday night.<br><br>Throughout the weekend, I looked for some particular faces. All had gone to serve our country, save one. I ran into him at the Title 2 crossroads of the world, between the Range House and the Pole Barn at Knob Creek Range. I stated, ‘I didn’t expect to see you here.’ He said, ‘The got my buddy on Friday. They will call me up when I get back on Monday.’ We never said good-bye. We said, ‘Until we meet again.’ This man has assisted this writer and some others with deep background on armaments. To him, to those that were missing, and to all of the men and women who now put their lives on the line for our country, we dedicate the following.<br><br><strong>Seven Spanish Angels</strong><br><br>As we write this in late October, we cannot know the events of the coming months. We do know this. When daylight broke on September 11, 2001, our country moved as it had the day before. The events just before 9 o’clock on that day changed everything. The talking heads of network news proclaimed that America had changed forever and entered a new age. As usual they were half correct. In less than a day we threw away 55 years of liberalism. We went back to the generations of those who came before us. We went back to the time of Theodore Roosevelt. The forces of evil mistakenly awakened what Isoroku Yamamoto later called ‘&#8230;the sleeping giant.’ We still walk softly but we now carry an awfully large stick. Perhaps the distinguished actor James Woods put it best. On Jay Leno’s Tonight Show the actor stated, ‘&#8230;forget political correctness, we are at war!’ In that light we offer this, especially for our readers at Campbell, Lejeune, and Bragg.<br><br>Early in his Presidency, Theodore Roosevelt returned the captured battle flags to the Confederate States. Now the descendants of those states and all of the other states answer our country’s call. Our men and women in the military now go to war for us, and for all of the civilized world. Our soldiers who go into the night must know the following above all else. Our fervent prayers go with you. Some, and perhaps a good many, of you will not return. For you, the best and brightest among us, we offer these last few words. May seven Spanish Angels forever comfort you, and always light your path. Your cause always shall remain undeminished. Your honor shall always be bright.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N9 (June 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
