<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Anders Thygesen &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/anders-thygesen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>THE &#8220;DRILL-PURPOSE&#8221; WELROD</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-drill-purpose-welrod/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N11 (Aug 2009)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drill Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mk.IIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welrod Pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=15411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Anders Thygesen The Welrod Mk.IIA is a unique pistol with an integrated silencer chambered for the .32 ACP cartridge. The pistol was invented by the Special Operation Executive (S.O.E.) during World War II and airdropped to the resistance in the occupied countries in large quantities. The purpose was to silently liquidate informers, collaborators and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Anders Thygesen</em></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="700" height="310" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-85.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15413" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-85.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-85-300x133.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-85-600x266.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The DP Welrod in mint condition but with the white 1/2 inch band almost worn of. On all the DPs that I have seen photos of it seems that it has been purposely ground off mechanically in order to look used. (Photo, private collection).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The Welrod Mk.IIA is a unique pistol with an integrated silencer chambered for the .32 ACP cartridge. The pistol was invented by the Special Operation Executive (S.O.E.) during World War II and airdropped to the resistance in the occupied countries in large quantities. The purpose was to silently liquidate informers, collaborators and Gestapo officials. An assignment the Welrod completed to its fullest.</p>



<p>Around the middle of 2005, a unique lot of 10 so called Drill Purpose (DP) Welrods suddenly surfaced. In order to authenticate them a story followed purporting they originated from a WWII weapons cache in Norway. Shortly thereafter the DPs were put up for sale at online auctions and gun shows in Scandinavia.</p>



<p>However, when a treasure like a DP Welrod pops up out of nowhere never having been mentioned in any of the many documents that I have had the opportunity to read during my research, I became a little skeptical.</p>



<p>The DP was described to me as a non-firing version made to chamber an empty .32 ACP shell case. The barrel is smoothbore with a “calibre” of only 5mm but fitted with the usual bleeder holes. They are stamped with the usual five pointed star and square, inspection stamps and a two digit serial number. The bolt is solid in front and fitted with a shortened firing pin. The DP Welrod can be recognized because of a painted white 1/2 inch wide band around the silencer tube just in front of the trigger. I have since discovered that not all of them have the painted white band.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="685" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-92.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15414" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-92.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-92-300x294.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-92-600x587.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Nine DP Welrods displayed on the Norwegian flag. (Photo by Richard Karlson, Sweden)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Differences</strong></p>



<p>Unfortunately, with the exception of the rubber grip and silencer tube end cap, I have not had the chance to handle the DP myself. But I have had the opportunity to compare close up photos of the DP with the original Welrods, and they are definitely not made on the same set of machine tools. I have listed only a few of the differences below:</p>



<p>1.) The DP trigger guide plates have sharp edges as opposed to the Welrod which has rounded edges.</p>



<p>2.) The knurled pattern on the DP muzzle cap is coarse cut when compared to the Welrods fine pattern.</p>



<p>3.) The luminous paint on the DP is bright white but on the Welrods it is dark yellow and browning due to old age.</p>



<p>4.) Noticeable differences in the serial digits because of different type faces.</p>



<p>5.) The finish on the DPs looks pristine with the exception of the white band where the paint is almost worn off.</p>



<p>6.) The black grip is made from soft rubber: its shape, size and feel differ a lot from the original Ebonite grip.</p>



<p>7.) The rubber discs in the silencer are undoubtedly made from modern materials and bear no similarity to the originals consisting of laminated layers of rubber and leather/linen.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="553" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-89.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15415" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-89.jpg 553w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-89-237x300.jpg 237w" sizes="(max-width: 553px) 100vw, 553px" /><figcaption><em>The DP (top) trigger guide plates have sharp edges whereas the Welrod (bottom) has rounded edges. The DP screws are blued whereas the Welrods are parkerized.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>It is difficult to conceive that a special DP Welrod would be made solely for instructional purposes when it would be easier to use the already available original. In wartime, it would not be feasible to start a second production line for a dummy pistol. Furthermore, the fact that the DP is a combination of the Mk.II and Mk.IIA is also worth considering. It has the first pattern oval ejection port scallop that characterizes the Mk.II but the trigger and trigger guides (side plates) of the Mk.IIA models. I have only seen two Welrods with this combination and they were from the early stages of the production with a serial number close to #3000.</p>



<p>Another thing that raises concern is the bleeder holes in the barrel. If the DP was made for practice and instructional purposes, as claimed, why bother with the bleeder holes? It was obviously never going to fire a live round from a .32 ACP casing through a 5mm smoothbore barrel. Besides, the operator does not have access to the barrel on the original Welrods as the silencer tube is fixed to the receiver with a mandrel stamp. To gain access to that particular area would be going far beyond the term “field stripping” and would be a job for the armourer. In short, it simply doesn’t make sense to drill bleeder holes in a smoothbore barrel, especially because the bolt face is solid and therefore unable to fire a cartridge or operate a firing pin.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="500" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-84.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15416" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-84.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-84-300x214.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-84-600x429.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The overall finish on the DP is pristine with the exception of the white band that has almost worn off. Notice the oval ejection port scallop that characterizes an early production lot. (Photo, private collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The silencer is complete with baffles, spacers and rubber disks. The rubber discs are made from what looks like a modern day rubber material. I am convinced that the reason that the DPs are marketed with the non functional barrel and bolt is to enable it to pass as a non-firing replica, making it easier to get across country borders, and to gain access to a potential worldwide buyer market.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="330" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-71.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15417" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-71.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-71-300x141.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-71-600x283.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The DP Welrod: Notice the black paint on the grip safety and the “L” in a double diamond on the butt of the receiver. The markings can vary. (Photo, private collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>I must admit that it is a very well made copy of the Welrod and a lot of effort has been put into the job to make sure the details are correct. The threads are identical, making the parts interchangeable. The small inspection stamp found on the butt of the receiver is present and there are even traces of black paint that can occasionally be found on the original Welrods.</p>



<p><strong>Summary &amp; Conclusion</strong></p>



<p>During my research, I have been in contact with the dealer on a regular basis reporting my findings. He has explained that he bought 10 DPs from a man in Norway claiming that he had found them in a weapons cache from World War II.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="440" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-62.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15418" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-62.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-62-300x189.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-62-600x377.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The final proof: unfinished parts from the box. Notice the brown discs made from modern soft rubber. (Photo by Richard Karlson, Sweden).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>With the above mentioned findings at hand, the dealer confronted the seller only to find him hospitalized and in a terminal condition. The dealer then made contact with the seller’s son who admitted that a total of 15 DPs had been produced whereupon he then gave the dealer a box of unfinished DP parts as shown in the photo.</p>



<p>In my opinion the problem is not the reproduced items them selves, but that they were marketed and sold as original items. For decades, collectors of German war artifacts have been suffering from this type of scam, and now unfortunately we must conclude that the same is happening when collecting from “the other side” too. Apparently, the widespread use and high prices obtained on internet auction sites have provided incentive for this type of scam. Internet auctions were not in common use 10 years ago, the market of potential buyers was also much smaller and confined to local areas, keeping the sale price down, making it unfeasible to start such fraudulent productions at such a high level.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V12N11 (August 2009)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HAND GRENADE M. 1923</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/hand-grenade-m-1923/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N6 (Mar 2009)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erik Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hand Bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hand Grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M41]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odense’s electrical plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N6]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=14973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Anders Thygesen It was a shameful day when the Germans occupied Denmark on April 9, 1940. The government surrendered after only a few hours of fighting and the chance of recognition as an ally of England was not to be in this round. However, not all good Danes accepted the government’s recommendation of accepting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Anders Thygesen</em></p>



<p><em>It was a shameful day when the Germans occupied Denmark on April 9, 1940. The government surrendered after only a few hours of fighting and the chance of recognition as an ally of England was not to be in this round. However, not all good Danes accepted the government’s recommendation of accepting the presence of the occupying force without sword blows, and on the very next day, April 10, 1940, the first illegal sabotage strike was dealt with the blast from a Danish hand grenade M23.</em></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="619" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14976" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53-300x265.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53-600x531.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Cutaway of Hand Bomb M23. Right &#8211; Hand Grenade M23 with fragmentation shells attached.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The day prior, Danish engineer Erik Olsen from Odense’s electrical plant obtained the hand grenade from the Odense army barracks and subsequently threw it at a German troop transport train near Marslev. It was hardly an act that kept the German occupying force awake at night; nevertheless it was the opening salvo in a long line of sabotage missions conducted by a growing and extraordinarily effective resistance movement.</p>



<p><strong>The Different Models</strong></p>



<p>The basic version was the Hand Bomb M23 (offensive). Enveloped in an additional pair of cast iron fragmentation shells, manually attachable with steel wire, the Hand Bomb would become the Hand Grenade M23 (defensive). Both grenades were painted grey and some had a yellow band painted around the body of the grenade.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="662" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14977" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61-300x284.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61-600x567.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The ventilation holes are visible in the fuse housing. The holes were normally covered with a piece of lacquered paper, but because these grenade’s fuses have been ignited, the hot escaping gasses have burned away the paper. Also, the filler hole is visible on the grenade to the right. When the grenade was filled, a metal plate was soldered on to close the hole.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The construction of the practice version of the M23 differed slightly from the live version in that it was made from thicker steel as it had to withstand multiple impacts with the ground from throwing practice. A special cartridge containing a small black powder charge to simulate a detonation had to be inserted and it could be reloaded and thrown multiple times. The drawback was that it had to be returned to the manufacturer for reassembly of the fuse section. All the practice M23s were painted yellow or grey; the grey with a black band painted on the top cone.</p>



<p>In 1941 a new variant of the practice grenade, called the Blank Hand Bomb M41, was introduced for use in combat drill scenarios. The top 2/3 was made from wood and the bottom 1/3 from a cardboard tube filled with black powder. Just like the yellow practice grenade it could be reloaded but it also had to be returned to the manufacturer for reassembly.</p>



<p>A blank Hand Bomb/Hand Grenade M23 made from wood and steel was also used but no pyrotechnics were involved and it was only used to practice throwing an object with similar weight and shape.</p>



<p>The grenade body consists of a 0.6 millimeter (0.0236 inch) thick steel cylinder with conical cups soldered to each end. The top cone houses the fuse and striker which are threaded into a central tube running through the whole length of the grenade body, ending up protruding from the bottom cone. The detonator designated Taendpatron M. 23 was enclosed inside the other end of the tube behind the knurled brass end cap.</p>



<p>The fuse, from which the striker protrudes, has four vent holes positioned 90 degrees apart in the housing. One end of a safety wire extends through a hole in the striker and the other end extends through a hole in the safety interrupter tube and the safety interrupter. The safety interrupter rests in a tubed T-section inserted in the centre of the well thereby separating the delay charge from the flash channel leading to the detonator. On the opposite side of the safety interrupter there is a rectangular cover plate soldered over the filler hole.</p>



<p>The interrupter assures that the grenade doesn’t detonate prematurely due to a defective delay charge or before it has been thrown to a safe distance.</p>



<p>If the delay charge burns through with the interrupter still in place, the spark will be stopped before reaching the 2-second delay flash channel. The interrupter has a channel drilled lengthwise about 3/4 deep and it ends up in a vent hole. This is so the hot expanding gasses from the burning fuse can escape via the channel and out through the vent hole, into the interrupter tube and out without making contact with the 2-second fuse below.</p>



<p>One of the obvious drawbacks to this design is that the grenade is extremely sensitive to water and even just moisture, hence every single grenade was packed in a wax sealed cardboard box. The moisture sensitivity problem in combination with the complex functionality and cumbersome design made it no match compared to the British and U.S. pineapple or the German M24 stick grenade.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="470" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-60.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14979" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-60.jpg 470w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-60-201x300.jpg 201w" sizes="(max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px" /><figcaption><em>Handbomb Model 1923. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, December 6, 1935.)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In order to throw the grenade, a firm grip around the grenade body with the thumb resting on the interrupter, are advised. Then the safety wire going through the striker is pulled out and then the other end of the wire has to be pulled from the safety interrupter. Now hit the striker plate hard with the other hand or against any hard surface with enough force to overpower the creep spring holding the primer away from the fixed firing pin, thereby ramming the percussion primer into the firing pin, initiating the primer, which in turn ignites the delay charge. A hissing sound from the 3.5 second black powder delay fuse is heard and the lacquered paper covering the four vent holes will start burning away.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="638" height="303" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14980" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55.jpg 638w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55-300x142.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55-600x285.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 638px) 100vw, 638px" /><figcaption><em>Taendpatron M23: Length 42 mm, diameter 9.2 mm, weight 13.5 grams, delay charge 2 seconds. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, 22 December, 1923)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>When thrown, the grenade will spin along the lengthwise axis like an American football, thereby causing the centrifugal power and gravity to pull out the interrupter from the grenade body. After about 3 meters (10 feet) of flight the interrupter will fall away and the grenade is now armed.</p>



<p>The grenade is filled with 150 grams (5.3 oz) of Trinitrotoluene (TNT), making the total weight of the grenade 350 grams (12.3 oz). The M23 offensive grenade has an effective range of only 4 meters (13 feet). The official safety distance is 60 meters (197 feet) but it is advised that unprotected personnel turn their back towards the detonation site or at least cover their faces.</p>



<p>The markings can vary from the number “23” or a letter “K” inside a 12 pointed star and “AK/B 1942” the number being the year of manufacture. Also the stenciled letters “AMA” can be found being the abbreviation for the Danish ammunition factory named AmMunitions Arsenalet. Additionally, many of them have a painted 3/4-inch wide yellow band.</p>



<p>The defensive Hand grenade M23 is basically a Hand Bomb M23 in disguise. Two fragmentation shells made from cast iron are attached to the grenade body with two wire loops. A cutout has been made in the two shells to make room for the safety interrupter and safety wire. According to the manual, the shells will fragment into 48 pieces weighing 3.2 grams (0.1129 oz) and 64 pieces weighing 2.3 grams (0.081 oz) the effective range being 10 to 15 meters (32 to 50 feet). The official safety distance is 150 meters (492 feet) but again it is advised that unprotected personnel turn their back towards the detonation site.</p>



<p>The shells weigh 150 grams (5.291 oz) each, almost doubling the weight of the grenade to a total of 650 grams (30 oz). The operational procedure for the defensive grenade is, for obvious reasons, exactly the same as for the offensive.</p>



<p><strong>Taendpatron Model 1923/31/41 (Detonator)</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="455" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-44.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14981" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-44.jpg 455w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-44-195x300.jpg 195w" sizes="(max-width: 455px) 100vw, 455px" /><figcaption><em>(Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Håndgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, January 30, 1925.)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The detonator M23 consist of a brass section containing a 2 second black powder delay charge and a copper section containing 2 grams (0.0705 oz) of mercury fulminate explosive charge. The copper section is crimped to the brass section and the open end of the brass tube is sealed with a bakelite cap.</p>



<p>In 1931, the mercury fulminate was discontinued and replaced with Tetryl and lead acid, which is a more stable and powerful explosive. Also, both sections were made from brass. The diameter of the bakelite cap was increased from 9 mm to 10 mm to avoid the possible mistake of inserting the detonator with the bakelite seal still in place. Due to these modifications the nomenclature was changed to Taendpatron Model 1931.</p>



<p>In 1941, it was found that the total delay time at 5.5 seconds (3.5 sec. + 2 sec.) was too long and a new Taendpatron (detonator) with a delay charge of only 0.5 second was introduced, reducing the total delay to 4 seconds (3.5 sec + 0.5 sec). This detonator received the nomenclature Taendpatron Model 1941.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="367" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14982" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39-600x315.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>(Illustration: Flådens og Kystdefentionens Håndvåben og Maskinskyts, Copenhagen 1942)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Hand Bomb Model 1923 (Practice)</strong></p>



<p>The practice version of the M23 offensive grenade came in two different colors. One is painted yellow to distinguish it from the live grenade, and the other is grey with a 10 mm (0.3937 inch) black painted band around the top cone. Apart from the color, it differs by being thicker in the construction as the cylindrical mid section of the grenade body is made from 2.5 mm (0.09 inch) and the cones from 1 mm (0.039 inch) thick metal versus the 0.6 mm (0.0236 inch) on the live grenade. The alteration was solely made for reasons of durability and had no influence on the functionality or use of the grenade. Furthermore, the practice grenades have no filler hole or cover plate. Two small holes, one just below the safety interrupter and another one on the opposite side on the top of the cone, are drilled in the body to further tell them apart from the live grenades. Both holes are approximately 2.5 mm (0.09 inch) in diameter. Additionally, the knurled brass end caps on practice grenades have a central 6 mm exhaust hole so the gas and smoke from the spotter charge can escape. The practice grenades also usually have a string of dots from a mandrel on the mid cylinder just below the safety interrupter. The number of dots can vary from just one to numerous and they serve the purpose of telling how many times this particular grenade has been reloaded. Two fragmentation shells can of course be attached to the practice grenade in order to simulate the defensive Hand Grenade M23.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="666" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14983" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33.jpg 666w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33-285x300.jpg 285w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33-600x631.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 666px) 100vw, 666px" /><figcaption><em>Hand Bomb M23 with one of two fragmentation shells. This example has a painted yellow band.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The grenade can be armed with two different charges. A black powder spotting charge called Ovelses Taendpatron M23 (drill charge M23) can be inserted into the detonator channel covered by the brass end cap.</p>



<p>The spotting charge is an enclosed unit containing the second delay fuse (2 sec.) along with a small 0.7 gram (11 grain) black powder charge sealed off with a lump of wax. When the charge fires the wax seal, the expanding gases and smoke escape through the 6 mm central hole in the end cap. To follow up on the modified detonator M41 the delay was reduced from 2 seconds to 0.5 seconds and now renamed Ovelses Taendpatron M41 (drill Charge M41). The drill charge is painted red, stamped with the Danish letter “Ø” meaning “Drill” and made from brass.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="668" height="306" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14984" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29.jpg 668w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29-300x137.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29-600x275.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 668px) 100vw, 668px" /><figcaption><em>Drill charge M23 loaded with black powder and sealed with wax. Length 54 mm, diameter 9.2, weight 23 grams. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, December 22, 1923)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The other charge is a Provetaendpatron M23 (Test charge M23), which consists of only the black powder 2 second delay element. The grenade could then be test fired and demonstrated inside a class room. The test charge’s outer appearance is similar to the drill charge except it has four holes drilled from the side and one from the bottom. In 1941, the delay was reduced to 0.5 second and renamed Provetaendpatron M41 (Test Charge M41).</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="485" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009-27.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14985" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009-27.jpg 485w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009-27-208x300.jpg 208w" sizes="(max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px" /><figcaption><em>Notice the thicker wall on the cylindrical mid piece and the 6 mm exhaust hole in the end cap. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, January 30, 1925)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="401" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/010-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14986" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/010-19.jpg 401w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/010-19-172x300.jpg 172w" sizes="(max-width: 401px) 100vw, 401px" /><figcaption><em>Illustration of the Blank Hand Bomb M41. Notice the dummy safety interrupter.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Hand Bomb Model 1941</strong></p>



<p>In 1941 a new practice grenade called Los Haandbombe M41 (Blank Hand Bomb M41) was introduced. The top 2/3 is made from wood and has a steel cylinder inserted in order to gain weight equivalent to the live grenade. The bottom 1/3 is made from a cardboard tube and filled with 30 grams (1.058 oz) of black powder. The safety interrupter is non functional and only serves the purpose of resembling the live one. Because of the black powder charge, a safety distance of 3 meters (10 feet) was set. Just like the yellow and grey practice grenades it could be reloaded but it had to be returned to the manufacturer for reassembling. The first versions were unpainted wood and the cardboard were painted black; later the wood was painted white and finally the last versions were painted grey all over except for the black band around the top.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="291" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14987" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15-300x125.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15-600x249.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Test charge M/41. Four holes are drilled for easy recognition. (Illustration: Flådens og Kystdefentionens Håndvåben og Maskinskyts, Copenhagen 1942)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="655" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14988" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13-300x281.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13-600x561.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The M23 practice grenade can be recognized by two 2.5 mm (0.0984 inch) holes drilled in the body. One hole is drilled just below the safety interrupter as shown on the grey grenade and the other on the top of the cone on the opposite side as shown on the yellow grenade. Also the knurled brass end cap on practice grenades has a central 6 mm exhaust hole so the gas and smoke from the spotter charge can escape. Notice the mandrel stamps on the grey grenade telling how many times it has been reloaded.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="532" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14989" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8-300x228.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8-600x456.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A box with 10 second-generation Drill charge M41. Notice the stamped “Ø” indicating a drill charge.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="615" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14990" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5-300x264.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5-600x527.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Blank Hand Bomb M/41 with a 30 gram (1.058 oz) black powder charge. The white to the left is from 1942 and the grey to the right is from 1956. Notice the paper covering the exhaust holes in the fuse indicating that the fuse is live.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Hand Bomb/Hand Grenade Model 1923 (Blind)</strong></p>



<p>A Blind Hand Bomb and Hand grenade M23 made from wood and steel were also used but no pyrotechnics were involved and it was only used to practice throwing an object with similar weight and shape as the live ones. It has a steel plate in each end. The plate on top has the word “OP” (UP) stamped, and a steel button is protruding from the side simulating the safety interrupter. The Blind Hand Bomb M23 weighs 350 grams (12.345 oz) and measures 10.5 cm (4.133 inch) long and 5.7 cm (2.244 inch) wide. The Blind Hand Grenade M23 weighs 650 grams (22.928 oz) and measures 10.5 cm (4.133 inch) long and 6.5 cm (2.559 inch) wide. The blind is painted white for ease of spotting and recovering in the terrain. Other versions are known to exist and cheap ones have been observed also made from wood but they had a 4 cm (1.57 inch) broad and 5 mm (0.1969 inch) thick iron ring attached to the body with a bolt that doubles as the interrupter knob. The grenades were painted silver grey.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="572" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14991" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3-300x245.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3-600x490.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Blind Handbomb M23 to the left and the Hand Grenade M23 to the right: both made from wood and steel.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The M23 and its variants have been obsolete for many years now. Exactly how many were used during World War II is unknown although a good portion certainly were used by the resistance movement. Unfortunately the Germans took over the production during the occupation and adopted it in the Wehrmacht and gave it the nomenclature respectively “Handgranaten 342(d) and 343(d).”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="483" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14992" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4-300x207.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4-600x414.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Blind Hand Bomb M/23 and Hand Grenade M23. (Illustration: Flådens og Kystdefentionens Håndvåben og Maskinskyts, Copenhagen 1942)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V12N6 (March 2009)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE FOG SIGNAL MK.I A</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-fog-signal-mk-i-a/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V11N6 (Mar 2008)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V11N6]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=12858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Three Fog Signal boxes, each packed with four Fog Signals, two paper envelopes of Cordtex Joint and a roll of Cordtex upon a linen mail post sack. By Anders Thygesen Sabotage &#8211; The Fog Signal serves as a brilliant example to illustrate how an organization in dire need was able to devise a useful and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="has-small-font-size"><em>Three Fog Signal boxes, each packed with four Fog Signals, two paper envelopes of Cordtex Joint and a roll of Cordtex upon a linen mail post sack.</em></p>



<p><em>By <strong>Anders Thygesen</strong></em></p>



<p><em>Sabotage &#8211; The Fog Signal serves as a brilliant example to illustrate how an organization in dire need was able to devise a useful and practical solution to an immediate problem without reinventing the wheel. As the S.O.E. (Special Operations Executive) took root in the occupied countries during World War II, the need for efficient sabotage equipment increased. An efficient and fairly easy place for the resistance groups to attack was the railway system. In Denmark alone 1,525 rails and trains were destroyed during the years of 1943 &#8211; 1945.</em></p>



<p>Often it was not only the trains that were blown up. The best and most cost efficient method of sabotage to hamper the German war machine was gained by derailing the train and its cargo of war materials, causing ruin or comprehensive delays. To this end, a trigger device was needed for demolishing the rail directly ahead of the oncoming locomotives eliminating the possibility of bringing the train to a halt before derailment was accomplished. The solution was obvious and had been used ever since the late 1800s.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="540" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12860" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-3-300x231.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-3-600x463.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Two original Fog Signal containers of different size used by British Railways and Kynoch produced Fog Signals. The Fog Signals shown date to circa 1900, were produced by G. Kynoch of Birmingham, and were produced as late as 1960. Note the stamped “B.R.” logo (pre 1948 British Railways, post 1948 British Rail) on both containers. The brass tag reads, “THIS CASE CONTAINS 12 DETONATORS &amp; 2 RED FLAGS IF SEAL IS INTACT.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="530" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12861" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-3-300x227.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-3-600x454.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>From left to right; a rare white Mk.I A signal stamped “DUMMY”. These were airdropped to the resistance for instructional and training purposes. A first generation Fog Signal (Mk.I?) before the spring snout was added. It is sealed with a cork against moisture. A sectioned Mk.I A signal with the pressure plate and two of the three percussion caps clearly visible. The black powder and quick match fuse have been removed. Traces of the crumbling rubber sleeve are still present on the spring snout.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="362" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12862" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-3-300x155.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-3-600x310.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A very rare dummy Fog Signal with extendable wire legs to ease attachment over various sized railroad tracks. It is most likely an experimental version. (Norman Bonney)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Development</strong></p>



<p>As early as March 1893, an article in a Danish local newspaper reported how a new signal device had been introduced that was able to notify a locomotive engineer when, for example, the Stop-signal was obscured by fog. The Danish Railway Guide Book of 1944 instructs a railway worker to place three Fog Signals in a row on both tracks in such a way that a locomotive crossing them would produce a series of loud “gunshots” notifying the engineer and warning him to reduce speed.</p>



<p><strong>Description</strong></p>



<p>The civilian version produced by Kynoch measures 2.055 inches (5.2cm) in diameter and 0.4 inch (10mm) high. It is made from a concentric metal bowl and soldered on the inside to a pressure plate. The bowl is crimped onto a circular sheet metal plate soldered to three, and in some cases up to seven, anvils on which percussion caps are placed. This plate serves as the base of the Fog Signal. The Fog Signal houses 125 grains (8 grams) of black powder adjacent to the percussion caps. A mount holding a pair of wire legs is soldered to the bottom plate. The legs are flexible allowing them to be squeezed over the track, thus fixing the Fog Signal to the track.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="388" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12863" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-3-300x166.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-3-600x333.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Correct setup placed with the spring snout holding the detonator facing towards the outside of the track. The detonator is connected to the two sticks of PE. No. 2 explosive by a piece of Cordtex (detonating cord). Normally two or three charges were connected with Cordtex and placed three feet apart on the rail.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>When the locomotive runs over the bowl with the pressure plate, it is squeezed against the percussion caps setting them off and igniting the black powder. Because the black powder is confined in such a small place the rapidly expanding gasses of the explosion cause the sealed bowl to burst generating a loud bang.</p>



<p>The modified S.O.E. version is grey and measures only 1.57 inches (4cm) in diameter and 0.6 inches (1.5cm) high. Mechanically it is built using identical principles as the civilian version. However, the bowl and the wire mount are made from brass. Only the bottom plate is sheet metal. Three percussion caps are to be found inside and there is a 2 inch (5cm) long quick match fuse wrapped around the caps adjacent to the black powder.</p>



<p>The most significant difference from the civilian Fog Signal is the 1.26 inch (3.2cm) spring snout protruding from the side of the bowl. It is identical to the spring snout found on the “Timepencil” Switch No.10 and serves exactly the same purpose of holding a detonator or a Bickford fuse. The snout itself serves as a funnel for leading hot gasses from the inside of the bowl through the snout and into the detonator assuring reliable ignition.</p>



<p><strong>Function</strong></p>



<p>In order to guarantee successful operation it was essential that the Fog Signal be placed correctly on the track. As the illustration from the Enemy Sabotage Equipment, the War Office, May 1945, shows, it is clearly seen that the bowl is not centrally mounted on the wire pegs. This is so that the spring snout will protrude as far as possible from the surface of the track. It was therefore extremely important that the saboteur attached the Fog Signal so that the spring snout holding the detonator was facing towards the outside of the track, otherwise the snout with the detonator would be cut clean off by the flange on the locomotive’s wheels before ignition.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="615" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12864" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-3-300x264.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-3-600x527.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A comparison of the red civilian produced Fog Signal from Kynoch and the S.O.E. produced grey Fog Signal. The latter is fitted with a spring snout covered by a rubber sleeve plugged with wood to keep it moisture proof.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The distance between the Fog Signal (ignition point) to the main charge placed in front of the locomotive is set by the length of Cordtex (detonating cord). The Cordtex is attached to the detonator by tape or a Cordtex Joint wire and connected to one or more charges. The burning rate for the Cordtex is approximately 23,000 fps. (7,000m/s). This means that the ignition device and demolition charge fire simultaneously regardless of the length of Cordtex and number of charges used.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="400" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12865" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-2-300x171.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-2-600x343.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A U.S. produced Fog Signal designated as Firing Device, R. R. Torpedo A3. Notice the lead straps and the “L” shaped metal plate that ensures that the spring snout is kept pointing outwards from the center of the tracks. (Courtesy of Dr. John W. Brunner from his book OSS Weapons II)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="533" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12866" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-2.jpg 533w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-2-228x300.jpg 228w" sizes="(max-width: 533px) 100vw, 533px" /><figcaption><em>The diagram illustrates how the charges should be placed on the track. Later it was discovered that charges placed under the track were far more effective. The diagram is from the sabotage pamphlet air dropped to the resistance in containers with the Fog Signals and other sabotage equipment.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Different Models</strong></p>



<p>Two commonly known variations were available to the resistance. The British S.O.E. version Mk.I A as previously described and one produced by the U.S. O.S.S. (Office of Strategic Services) designated as Firing Device, R. R. Torpedo A3. It was an improved version developed in October 1943. Apparently the Germans, in an effort to avoid the Fog Signals, attached wire brushes to the front of the locomotive thus sweeping the tracks. The R. R. Torpedo A3 was more firmly attached to the tracks due to the lead straps making it more resistant to the wire brushes. It differs somewhat from the British version in appearance as the bottom plate is oval and the wire clams have been replaced with lead straps. The internal construction is exactly the same. The O.S.S. Fog Signal was produced by Western Cartridge Company of East Alton, Illinois.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="600" height="503" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12867" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-2.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-2-300x252.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /><figcaption><em>This label is from a mid 1960 production of Fog Signals long after the amalgamation of Kynoch and Eley Bros. Ltd. of London, which took place in 1918.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Special thanks to Norman Bonney and Dave Sampson of the UK and Dr. John Brunner of the USA for assisting in the preparation of this article.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V11N6 (March 2008)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>REMOTE CONTROL PISTOL</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/remote-control-pistol/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 03:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N12 (Sep 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable-pistol Mk. II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Johan Bruhn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chilblain I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chilblain II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Control Pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.O.E.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Operation Executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes Brothers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Andres Thygesen Operation Chilblain On December 27, 1941 at 8:40 p.m., a Whitley with the identification number Z.9125 from the Royal Air Force took off from Stradishall airbase in England. It was piloted by Sgt. Jones and 2nd pilot Sgt. Gold. Apart from its payload of four 250 pound bombs, the plane carried a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Andres Thygesen</strong></em></p>



<p><strong>Operation Chilblain</strong></p>



<p>On December 27, 1941 at 8:40 p.m., a Whitley with the identification number Z.9125 from the Royal Air Force took off from Stradishall airbase in England. It was piloted by Sgt. Jones and 2nd pilot Sgt. Gold. Apart from its payload of four 250 pound bombs, the plane carried a package in a parachute containing assorted equipment for the first Danish S.O.E. (Special Operation Executive) agent’s team (code named Chilblain I &amp; II) to set foot on Danish soil. The agents were Carl Johan Bruhn and Mogens K. A. Hammer. The airdrop, which took place at Haslev in South Zealand, should have been the spearhead for S.O.E’s future operations in Denmark and was code named “Operation Chilblain.” Carl Johan Bruhn was selected as chief of S.O.E. in Denmark while Mogens Hammer, in his capacity of being a telegraph operator, would establish the communication line back to England.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="277" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-36.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10383" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-36.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-36-300x119.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-36-600x237.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Cable-pistol Mk. II produced by John Wilkes from Wilkes Bros. gun shop. Note the coarse-cut <em>cover plate compared to the Mk. I version. Also note the cuts in the cover plate next to the magazine well making it easier to reload. </em><br><em>(<strong>Photo: UK Ministry of Defence &#8211; Pattern Room S.A.T.I.C.</strong>)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>At 9 p.m. that same night, 2 inches of snow covered the landscape. The temperature was about 18 degrees Fahrenheit and the wind was North East at about 17 miles per hour. It was moonlit, but with clouds drifting across the sky, it made navigation difficult especially at altitudes below 2,000 feet. As a diversion they flew to Masnedø at Vordingborg but their first approach towards the target failed and Sgt. Jones decided to try once more. On their second approach they were successful in dropping four bombs from a height of 1,000 feet. One of the bombs detonated in a field and another impacted close to the railway tracks only 150 yards from the transformer station. Unfortunately, no significant damage occurred and the last two bombs failed to detonate. The rear gunner signed off by firing four bursts from his machine guns at the target and then the Whitley headed out for the primary objective of the mission: the drop zone North East of Haslev.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="672" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-40.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10382" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-40.jpg 672w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-40-288x300.jpg 288w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-40-600x625.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 672px) 100vw, 672px" /><figcaption><em>Map showing the drop zone.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The plane circled a couple of times around the church in Freerslev approximately a mile south of the drop zone and then continued towards Torpeskov, to complete the mission. The drop, which took place from an altitude of only 500 feet, was “blind” which meant without a reception of Resistance fighters. Carl Johan Bruhn had expressly ordered a blind drop. His graduation in forestry in this particular area (Bregentved Gods) made him extremely familiar with the territory and he also had some personal friends that he could call upon.</p>



<p>According to Mogens Hammer’s personal account, told to his brother Svend Erik Hammer and in an interview with the Danish newspaper Berlingske Tidende from 7 August 1945, Carl Johan Bruhn was the first to jump, followed by the package, and then Mogens Hammer. From that height the luxury of carrying a reserve chute was not an option.</p>



<p>Unfortunately, Carl Johan Bruhn’s parachute failed to open as the snap hook on his static line came away from its anchorage point inside the aircraft and instead followed him to the ground. It was known that cable static lines had a tendency to “whip” but it had never been foreseen that the result of that behaviour could possibly cause the static eye-splice to part from its anchorage point. As a direct consequence of this accident all snap hooks are to this day fitted with a locking device.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="539" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-39.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10384" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-39.jpg 539w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-39-231x300.jpg 231w" sizes="(max-width: 539px) 100vw, 539px" /><figcaption><em>The Cable-pistol Mk. I found on Agent Bruhn’s body. Note the carefully crafted cover plate compared to the Mk. II version produced by Wilkes Bros. </em><br><em>(<strong>Photo: Danske Politi Efterretninger 7 January 1942</strong>)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Carl Johan Bruhn was instantly killed when he hit the ground and, with that, the first attempt to establish an S.O.E. operation in Denmark. Mogens Hammer landed safely and found the body of Carl Johan Bruhn within an hour. Searching the body, he salvaged the papers and money required to proceed with the operation. The money was hidden in Bruhn’s boots and he had to cut these open to get to it. Needless to say it was a very unpleasant experience for Hammer, especially as they had become good friends during their training. Mogens Hammer managed to slip away unobserved.</p>



<p><strong>The Remote Control Pistol</strong></p>



<p>The next morning, December 28, 1941 at 10:00 a.m., the temperature was 8 degrees Fahrenheit and the wind calm. The purple parachute connected to a suitcase was soon found by local farmers at the field of Holtegaarden next to Hostentorp. Regrettably, they failed to keep the information to themselves but notified the Danish police. Close by, a little north of there, the body of Carl Johan Bruhn was found still wearing his unopened parachute with the yellow static line still attached to the chute. Carl Johan Bruhn’s wristwatch had stopped at the time of impact showing 02:05 a.m. Next to him was found a canvas packet with 12 automatic pistols (unfortunately the report fails to establish the type) inside along with ammunition and a folding spade. The suitcase contained a radio telegraph transmitter, a grey rucksack containing civilian clothes and a white rubber package with a most unusual agent “tool” never before seen.</p>



<p>Research has succeeded to find only one official document from the War Office that confirms its existence and in this particular document, dated 6 of March 1942, it is referred to as the “Remote Control Pistol.” Despite this apparently official name, in the following text we chose to call it the Cable-pistol.</p>



<p>Because of the Cable-pistol, the German Reichssicherheitshauptamt in Berlin compiled a report which was sent out to all Statspolizei departments notifying them of the danger involved in arresting enemy spies and agents. The report, signed by Herr Müller, was stamped SECRET and dated 19 of February 1942. What the Germans thought of such a contraption is clearly described in the report: “Es handelt sich um eine überaus gefährliche Gangsterwaffe, die &#8211; soweit bekant &#8211; erstmalig von feindlichen Nachrichtendienst eingesetzt worden ist.” (“What we are dealing with is an extremely dangerous gangster weapon, which &#8211; as far as we know &#8211; originates from an enemy intelligence service.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="354" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-36.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10385" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-36.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-36-300x152.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-36-600x303.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The trigger to the left is an unknown and may be an improved version of the trigger device.</em> <em>But it could also easily have been a first generation trigger. In our opinion, it is a little too clumsy to have been the final product. The trigger device to the right is shown with the inner wire from the Bowden cable attached. It is identical to the one found on Mr. Bruhns Cable-pistol Mk. I.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>According to Danish Police Intelligence from 7 January 1942, found in a report in the Danish National Archive, the Cable-pistol is described in the following manner: “A suitcase containing one radio telegraph transmitter, a grey rucksack containing civilian clothes and a white rubber package with an automatic pistol riveted to a metal plate on a belt and a special trigger device (a very dangerous weapon), a dagger etc. inside.” The report was the direct cause for changing the restraining procedure. The decision of declaring an arrest by laying a hand on the suspects shoulder was immediately repealed.</p>



<p><strong>Description</strong></p>



<p>The pistol used is a Colt 1903 in .32 ACP. The gun is bolted pointing in the facing direction of the wearer to a carrier plate made of metal bent to follow the curvature of the body. A cover plate is mounted to shield the trigger and grip area. A Bowden cable with a release switch attached to a “finger ring” runs from the operator’s hand through the jacket-sleeve and is connected to the trigger housing. The system allowed the agent to fire one or more shots remotely from the hip if he was about to be arrested. This even if he was ordered “Hände Hoch” (‘hands up’). The whole apparatus was attached to the waist with the standard English model 1937 army belt. A single suspender strap attached to the belt in front of the plate mount assists in keeping the muzzle of the pistol pointing horizontal.</p>



<p><strong>Models</strong></p>



<p>We are aware of two different versions, both using the Colt Hammerless 1903 .32 ACP caliber pistol subsequently referred to as Mk. I and Mk. II. The one found on Carl Johan Bruhn is the Mk. I and the one produced by John Wilkes from the Wilkes Bros. gun shop in Soho, London is the Mk.II.</p>



<p>On the Mk. I model, one will notice that the cover plate is carefully bent and shaped to follow the pistol’s contours. The platform to which the pistol is attached is small and handy and the corners are curved leaving the impression of a professional production.</p>



<p>On the Mk. II version the cover plate is flat, rectangular and disproportionately big, which leaves the impressions of a hasty production. However, we know that the Mk. I version was encumbered with problems. For instance, the platform carrying the pistol was too small causing the pistol rig to be unstable during recoil. And, if the cable twisted, the pistol would not fire.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="460" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-32.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10386" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-32.jpg 460w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-32-197x300.jpg 197w" sizes="(max-width: 460px) 100vw, 460px" /><figcaption><em>The trigger device with the Bowden cable attached. It is the one found on Mr. Bruhn’s Cable-pistol Mk. I. (<strong>Photo: Danske Politi Efterretninger 7 January 1942</strong>)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>John Wilkes corrected these defects, and the rig as a whole, by making the platform bigger and made a modification to the trigger unit on the finger which allowed the cable to rotate freely without locking the trigger cable. According to John Wilkes, only 40 to 50 Cable-pistols were produced.</p>



<p><strong>Origin</strong></p>



<p>The Mk. I model was, according to John Wilkes, brought to the Wilkes gun shop by Major Ridout and Lt. Col. Tomlinson who requested that the gun be produced by John Wilkes. This information is rather interesting seen in light of newly released documents from the Public Record Office (PRO) in England. The book, SOE The Scientific Secrets by Fredric Boyce and Douglas Everett, features a reprint of a document that was produced towards the end of the war to ensure that the right persons would be properly credited for their inventions.</p>



<p>Among the entries on the list can be found: “Remote Control Firing Mechanism For Pistol.” The inventors are listed as Lt. Col. J.R.V Dolphin and Mr. E. Norman respectively. We now know that Lt. Col. John Robert Vernon Dolphin was Commander of Station IX (The Frythe). Station IX busied itself with the research and development of weapons and gear to be distributed to the resistance movements in the occupied countries and Eric Norman was one of its foremost weapons experts. In that light it is tempting to draw the conclusion that the Cable-pistol was invented and further developed at Station IX, only later to be handed over to Station VI (Bride Hall) being the weapons section and, as such, responsible for the further production. This is where Lt. Col. Tomlinson enters the scene. As chief of Station VI, he approached John Wilkes with the aim of getting a proper production started, the result of which is the Mk. II as we know it today.</p>



<p><strong>Distribution</strong></p>



<p>No one knows for sure how many Cable-pistols were used on missions, but it is certain that Carl Johan Bruhn and Mogens Hammer were issued one each for the Chilblain operation besides the one found in the rubber packing. It is believed, though unverified, that two Czechoslovakian S.O.E. agents who, on 27 May 1942, assassinated Reinhard Heydrich in Prague (Operation Anthropoid) were issued at least one Cable-pistol. It is doubtful if the gun was used from the rig but empty shell casings from one of the two issued Colt 1903 pistols were found at the scene of the action. The pistols have serial numbers 539370 and 540416 and, according to Colt’s shipping lists, they are both nickel plated. The pistols are now on display in the Prague Memorial Crypt.</p>



<p><strong>Status</strong></p>



<p>It has turned out to be very difficult to find any reliable information or evidence to prove its existence and the only model in existence that we are aware of is in storage at SATIC (Small Arms Technical Information Centre) in Leeds, U.K. formerly known as the MOD Pattern Room in the Enfield Building in Nottingham, U.K. Unfortunately there is no access to the public.</p>



<p>In 1980, the Imperial War Museum and the Pattern Room asked John Wilkes if they could borrow his original blueprints of the Cable-pistol which regrettably they failed to return. We enquired with both museums but neither could claim possession of the drawings.</p>



<p>The biggest mystery is what actually happened to the Mk. Is carried by the agents Carl Johan Bruhn and Mogens Hammer and the one in his luggage. We know that the two were seized by the German authorities but we haven’t been able to find them in any museums or archives in Denmark. It is possible that they were sent to Germany along with Mr. Müller’s report. After all, this was a completely new weapon never seen before. The one carried by Mogens Hammer has never turned up either but witness reports reveals that he was wearing it in Copenhagen after his escape.</p>



<p><strong>Acknowledgement</strong></p>



<p>We owe the following museums special thanks for their help and interest in our project: The Museum of Danish Resistance 1940-1945, Denmark; The Imperial War Museum, UK; The Ministry of Defence/Pattern Room, UK and S.A.T.I.C. (Small Arms Technical Information Centre), UK. We also thank the following individuals for their assistance and correspondence: Fredric Boyce, UK; John W. Brunner, USA; Paul Cornish &#8211; Imperial War Museum, UK; Joe M. Ramos, Canada; Mark Seaman &#8211; Imperial War Museum UK; Robert A. Sharrock &#8211; Ministry of Defence/Pattern Room, UK; Ian D. Skennerton, Australia; J. David Truby, USA; Craig Whitsey &#8211; Wilkes Bros., UK and John Wilkes &#8211; Wilkes Bros., UK.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V9N12 (September 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE WELROD PISTOL</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-welrod-pistol/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N5 (Feb 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welrod Pistol]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Anders Thygesen Having reached the final design, the Birmingham Small Arms Company (BSA), in all probability and under great secrecy, was commissioned to mass produce the Welrod pistol. The only distinguishing markings on the pistols were that of a little five-pointed star and square along with a serial number. All markings were stamped underneath [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Anders Thygesen</strong></em></p>



<p>Having reached the final design, the Birmingham Small Arms Company (BSA), in all probability and under great secrecy, was commissioned to mass produce the Welrod pistol. The only distinguishing markings on the pistols were that of a little five-pointed star and square along with a serial number. All markings were stamped underneath on the tube right behind the pistol grip.</p>



<p>The serial numbers, numeric only, are either 4 or 5 ciphered and in addition to the above mentioned position also stamped into the breech and etched into the magazine with an electrical pen. Not all magazines bear serial numbers though. The very first bore no markings at all and the moulded ebonite grip was slightly differently shaped than on most of those we find today. Also, the magazine was of a different model which can best be distinguished on the magazine jaws.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="330" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-94.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9504" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-94.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-94-300x141.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-94-600x283.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>On the far left is shown one of the first models with a slim “neck” and cross-filed locking mechanism. Note the different appearing magazine jaws. The two on the right are “the standard.” Note the two-stage cut-out in the ebonite grip on the far right magazine.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The square and the five-pointed star appear without exception on all of the inspected weapons. Yet it has not been possible to establish their true significance.</p>



<p>BSA claims none of the pistols bore serial numbers or other markings that could reveal the manufacturer. They do however confirm having produced parts for the Welrod as well as entire pistols but adds that several other British companies were involved in the production. Following is an excerpt from their correspondence: “Regarding the information that you are requiring on the Welrod pistol, although we have in the past manufactured specific parts for these particular pistols, we have no information regarding production development or variations of these pistols. All we know is that they were produced by a number of companies in Britain including BSA and these were developed specifically for covert operations in occupied Europe. They, therefore, bore no serial numbers or indication as to where they were manufactured.”</p>



<p>But if BSA did not mark the weapons then who did? Some assert that the star and the square are American markings, but I believe this theory can be excluded on the basis of correspondence from The Naval Historical Centre who states: “The Navy purchased an unknown number of Welrods for use. It is my understanding that they were given US Navy markings, with a final acceptance marking that was either “USN” or a stamped anchor&#8230;The US Naval Gun Factory and other manufactures have small proof markings for some items, but none use the star. Part markings for NGF &#8211; made items may include blueprint drawing numbers, such as “NGF &#8211; 12345.”</p>



<p>I regret not being able to account for the significance of the markings in a more precise manner other than what is mentioned above. I will leave it up to each individual to draw their own conclusions. It is a fact however, that entirely unmarked Welrods do exist. It is plausible that the pistols could have left BSA unmarked only to be stamped at the point from which they were later distributed.</p>



<p>The production of the Mk II was not officially up and running until late 1943, but several documents reveals that it was indeed available at the beginning of 1943. According to the serial numbers, at least 14,000 were supposedly produced. Only at the end of 1944 was the production of the Mk I under way, and the amount produced is unknown. The beginning of the production of the Mk I is so late in the war that it is undoubtedly the reason it was never dropped to the resistance.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="452" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-101.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9505" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-101.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-101-300x194.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-101-600x387.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>On the Mk IIA series the entire serial number has been etched into magazine whereas this Mk II model (top) only carry the two end digits on the back.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>At long last, documentation proving that the USA apparently, too, produced a number of Welrods has been found. However, there is no information as to when and how many. I rest convinced though that the Welrods used by the Americans during World War II were all manufactured and delivered by the British. This assumption is further supported by a written report from a meeting between some British liaison officers and American OSS agents at the Maryland Research Laboratory, August 16, 1943 concerning silenced weapons. The Welrod was highly praised by all the participants and the report concludes: “It was felt that for that special type of mission, it was the best available design and the U.S. should proceed with purchase of production model Welrods rather than trying for a home-built version.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="607" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-95.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9506" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-95.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-95-300x260.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-95-600x520.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Here is clearly shown the small square marking along with the five-pointed star. On this Mk II, the serial number is stamped along the length of the tube whereas the Mk IIA is stamped abeam of the length.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Still the Americans at some point began manufacturing their own. At the MOD Pattern Room (now S.A.T.I.C.) in England they retain a specimen with a full inscription on the silencer tube.&nbsp;<em><strong>(Dan’s Note:</strong>&nbsp;The late H.J. Woodend told me that he found this U.S. Navy example in Hong Kong and personally brought it back to the MOD Pattern Room. Herbie delighted in showing everyone how we Americans liked to conspicuously mark our so-called clandestine weapons.)</em></p>



<p>Right after the serial number is stamped the anchor of the U.S Navy with a “U” on its left side and an “S” on its right. In addition is engraved #422072—1 on top of the silencer tube, #422074—2 on the muzzle cap and #422072—6 on the back of the breech. These engravings can very well be serial numbers for the individual parts as described in the letter from The Naval Historical Centre. As there are no stampings of the star or of the square on this model, the engravings agree well with the statement from The Naval Historical Centre. Even if at first glance it appears to be a British Welrod, there are discernable differences. The difference are clearly seen on the individual parts that bears resemblance of a different manufacturing process; just as the gun itself differs markedly by having something best described as an angle bar welded onto the side of the breech, presumably to facilitate operation of the weapon when wearing gloves.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="591" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-88.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9508" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-88.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-88-300x253.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-88-600x507.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The serial number is clearly visible in the breech.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>During the 1960’s, a modified version of the Welrod Mk IIA was produced by Military Armament Corporation headed by Mitchell WerBell. The main differences from the original design consisted of replacing the ebonite on the grip with plastic and replacing the original insides of the tube with the more up-to-date silencer technology of Sionics. It has not been disclosed how many were made but most likely it was no more than a handful.</p>



<p><strong>“Execution” Campaign</strong></p>



<p>Newly released (2002) documents from the National Archives UK, reveals the planning of “Operation Execution Month” in June 1943. The operation called for the occupied countries to simultaneously assassinate as many Gestapo and SS officials as possible within a given month. For this purpose alone, a message went out to increase the production of Welrods in order to meet the demands of the pending campaign.</p>



<p>The operation was never carried out, probably due to fear of retaliation from the occupational forces. The Allies must have begun to realize the incalculable consequences of the previously carried out “Operation Anthropoid” at this point. This resulted in the terrible massacre in the Czech town of Lidice near Prague, where the entire male population was executed, all the women were deported, and the town itself was literally razed to the ground with bulldozers in retaliation for the assassination of SS Obergruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich on May 27, 1942 by two Czech S.O.E agents.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="458" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-73.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9510" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-73.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-73-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-73-600x393.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Welrod Mk IIA dismantled. Note the barrel bearing with the 12 vents as well as the insides of the silencer here shown exactly as it was packed. The magazine well has been forced into a milling in the receiver and then silver soldered for permanent fixation. Here the barrel has been fixed to the receiver with a pin, but an Allen-screw (hexagonal) has been observed on an earlier model.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Mk.I</strong></p>



<p>I have studied the manuals for both the “Type A” and “Type B”, but to the best of my efforts there are no visible differences between the two. The difference is most likely in the internal suppressor tube construction.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="201" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-58.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9515" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-58.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-58-300x86.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-58-600x172.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Photo of the text found stamped into the silencer tube on the USA produced Welrod: The Hand Firing Mechanism Mk.1 pistol. Note the stamped anchor. <br>(<strong>Photo: Richard D. Jones &#8211; MOD Pattern Room</strong>)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In the manuals, under Function, General Description and Notes on Use, the texts are identical and read as follows.&nbsp;<em>Function: The 9mm Welrod is a silent single shot pistol, intended for use by specially trained operators for specific tasks. General Description: The Weapon is a specially constructed single shot pistol with a detachable silencer. It is silent, reliable in action and easy to conceal. It is accurate up to 30 yards in daylight or 20 yards on a fairly light night, but is most effective when fired in contact with the target. Notes on Use: The gun has three distinct and separate uses. A) For aimed and deliberate shots in daylight or darkness. The effective range of the gun with normal handling is 15/30 yards. For deliberate shots, extreme accuracy is required and can only be obtained by correct trigger squeeze, i.e. a gradual squeeze by the whole hand. With training and practice it is possible to obtain very accurate groups at the distances mentioned. The gun should be held with the thumb and forefinger of the left hand as close up to the muzzle as possible, the pistol grip being held by the right hand. For standing shots, the left elbow should be as close to the body as possible and the rear of the gun approximately 6”/7”from the operator’s eye. B) Without its silencer and used as a single-shot weapon. C) By use of the weapon at the closest quarters, i.e. with the muzzle against the target. For this purpose no special training is required.</em></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="518" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-49.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9527" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-49.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-49-300x222.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-49-600x444.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The USA built Welrod compared to the British (top). Note the modified grip on the breech. (<strong>Photo: Richard D. Jones &#8211; MOD Pattern Room</strong>)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The construction itself is practically identical to that of the Mk IIA with the exception of a few details. The grip safety is slightly different in appearance but functions in the exact same manner. Placed underneath the tube right behind the grip safety, a secondary manually operated safety catch has been added. The trigger and trigger-function remains the same, but is now protected by a trigger guard. The magazine release has, due to the previously mentioned problems on the Mk II and Mk IIA, been moved in front of the grip and inside the trigger guard. The magazine is most likely from a .38 Colt Automatic, and the manual directs that although the total capacity allows for 6 bullets, that only 5 be loaded. The true difference lies with the suppressor tube that is two-piece. The rear piece, as with Mk II and Mk IIA, contains the breech, barrel and expansion chamber, whereas the front piece contains the baffles and washers section. The front piece, detachable just in front of the front sight, has a length of 4.9 inches bringing the pistol to a total length of 14.2 inches. The tube diameter is 1.4 inches, and the weight of the pistol is 48.2 ounce.</p>



<p>The advantage to a detachable front piece is obvious as this makes the weapon considerably easier to conceal. The pistol will function despite the front piece being removed; however the noise reduction will be minimal.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-38.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9528" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-38.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-38-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-38-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A rare photo of a resistance fighter and his Welrod. The photo is from Denmark dated May 5, 1945. (Photo: The Museum of Danish Resistance 1940-1945, Copenhagen)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The few examples I have had the opportunity to examine have all been marked with a 5 digit serial number as well as the familiar “star and square” stamp under the receiver.</p>



<p>The barrel is perforated with 16 holes, allowing the powder gases to escape into the expansion chamber surrounding the barrel. In this case the holes serve the purpose of preventing the bullets from going supersonic as is the standard of 9mm Parabellum ammunition. The suppressor piece differentiates markedly from Mk II and Mk IIA. It consists of 2 washers and a couple of baffles separated by a metal spacer best described as looking like a spool from a sewing machine and perforated by 24 holes. The spacer creates yet another expansion chamber for the gases to cool off in before passing through the last washer. The muzzle velocity is approx. 1,000 fps. (305m/s).</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="292" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-37.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9530" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-37.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-37-300x125.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-37-600x250.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Welrod Mk.I. Caliber 9mm Parabellum.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Apart from the manually operated safety and the magazine release, the Mk I is operated and functions as the Mk II and Mk IIA. The iron sights are coated with a fluorescent material that, according the manual, renders the weapon efficient at 20 yards on a bright summer eve. The effective range in daylight is reported to be 30 yards. The recommended maximum shooting range is 24 yards.</p>



<p><strong>Misinformation &amp; Myth</strong></p>



<p>It is necessary to mention the fact that in literature, the Welrod .32ACP is consistently referred to as Mk I just as the Welrod 9mm Parabellum is referred to as Mk II. In the case where the referral is to British Welrods, this is an error. It is safe to assume that the mix up occurred when the American .32ACP’s were designated Mk I, just to further confuse the issue. The Welrod Mk II was, from the beginning, constructed around caliber .32ACP. It was only later when some field operators, due to bad experiences, questioned the efficiency of the caliber .32ACP, that it was decided to further develop the Mk II. The result was the British Welrod Mk I, 9mm Parabellum.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="408" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-26.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9532" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-26.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-26-300x175.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-26-600x350.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p>To further add to the confusion, you will find that the American weapons literature in several places refer to the Welrod as “Hand Firing Device Mk I”. But on the Welrod that is kept in the Ministry of Defence/Pattern Room, the marking on the suppressor tube says: “.32 Hand Firing Mechanism Mk I.”</p>



<p>Additionally, in several places in literature, it can be found that the Welrod was developed by a British officer codenamed “Major Dolphin,” and that his real name was never revealed to the public. It is a fact that the Commander of the Frythe was Major John Robert Vernon Dolphin (later Lt. Col.). That he should have chosen a codename identical with his real name seems rather unlikely. This allegation is simply not true. Newly released documents from the National Archives UK, features a document that was produced towards the end of the war to ensure that the right persons would be properly credited for their inventions. The document reveals that the inventor of both the Welrod and the Sleevegun was Major H.Q.A. Reeves.</p>



<p>Major Hugh Quentin Alleyne Reeves was born in Seaford, Sussex late in 1909. Major Reeves was one of the most productive and creative engineers attached to Station IX. He was, among others, behind the Sten gun silencer, fluorescent night sights, the Sleeping Beauty and the Welgun but to mention a few. After the war he became involved in a project concerning noise reduction in jet engines. Unfortunately he was killed in an accident on October 25, 1955 at Bitteswell Airfield. Mr Reeves was investigating the problem of reducing noise from jet engines running on the ground. He was carrying out tests on a Hunter Mark V fitted with a Sapphire engine. While making an examination he was suddenly drawn into the intake of the silencer and received fatal injuries.</p>



<p>There are persistent rumors stating that the Welrod was also manufactured in calibers .380ACP and .45ACP. So far, this can not be confirmed, as I have been unable to find firm and trustworthy information on the subject.</p>



<p>Twice during my research I have come across information, stating that the Welrod was part of the equipment carried by 2nd Lt. Francis Gary Powers on board his American U2 spy plane when he was shot down over the USSR. This is not correct. Lt. Powers was armed with a silenced Hi-Standard model USA-HD caliber .22LR, serial number 120046. The serial number is not listed in High Standards annals, as the gun was delivered to the CIA, but that is another story entirely.</p>



<p><strong>Status</strong></p>



<p>Welrod Mk I and Mk IIA stayed in service for many years after the end of the war. Several, now retired, SAS (Special Air Service) operator’s report that the Welrod was in use during the Falklands, in Northern Ireland, and even as late as in the 1991 Gulf war. It is equally well documented that the American SOG (Studies and Observations Group) were using the Welrod in Vietnam.</p>



<p><strong>Acknowledgment</strong></p>



<p>I would like to take the opportunity to express my gratitude to the following in no particular order: Mr. J.M. Ramos for allowing the use of his drawing in my article. Dr. J. David Truby, Dr. John W. Brunner and Mr. Ralph Hagan for contributing with their help and knowledge. Museum Inspector Esben Kjeldbaek and Storage Manager Soren Rasmussen, both of The Museum of Danish Resistance 1940-1945, Copenhagen. Police Inspector Ole Rasmussen and Weapons Technician Palle Larsen, both of the Federal Danish Police department of weapons technology.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V9N5 (February 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE WELROD PISTOL PART 1</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N4 (Jan 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welrod Pistol]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Anders Thygesen (Editor’s Note: Part I of this two part article will describe the technical aspects in the construction of the Welrod pistol Mk.II &#38; Mk.IIA (.32 ACP) with some added historical background regarding its development. Next month in Part II, Mr. Thygesen will describe the Mk.I (9mm Parabellum) and will discuss production in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Anders Thygesen</strong></em><br><br><em>(Editor’s Note: Part I of this two part article will describe the technical aspects in the construction of the Welrod pistol Mk.II &amp; Mk.IIA (.32 ACP) with some added historical background regarding its development. Next month in Part II, Mr. Thygesen will describe the Mk.I (9mm Parabellum) and will discuss production in general, gun marks and the myths. &#8211; Robert G. Segel</em>)</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="403" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-79.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9353" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-79.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-79-300x173.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-79-600x345.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The Welrod to the left is a Mk II and on the right is the Mk IIA. An original canvas bag with three replacement washers is also shown.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>S.O.E.</strong></p>



<p>The Special Operations Executive (S.O.E.) was formed on July 19, 1940. It was primarily concerned with the organization of agents and cells of resistance throughout occupied Europe, as well as providing them with the weapons and means necessary to resist the German occupying forces and their collaborators. The research and development department, Station XII, was based in Aston House close to Stevenage. In addition, there was a weapons section located in the barns at Bride Hall known as Station VI, who, among other assignments, was tasked with the gathering of weapons from any imaginable source for the use of the resistance movements in Europe. The development and production of weapons for the SOE was handled by Station IX. The Commander of Station IX, Col. J.R.V. Dolphin, resided in The Frythe, a mansion approximately one hour drive north from London near the town of Welwyn.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="400" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-88.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9354" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-88.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-88-300x171.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-88-600x343.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Bride Hall, The Frythe and Welwyn. (<strong>Illustration: Marius Hartman</strong>)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Station IX</strong></p>



<p>Early in 1941, the decision was made to separate development from production. Station XII at Aston House took care of the production and Station IX became solely a research and development facility. Station IX now busied itself with the research and development of weapons and gear to be distributed to the resistance movements. Small cabins and barracks began to sprout all over the estate taking up function as laboratories and workshops. Station IX rapidly became a key factor in the support of the resistance movements and agents behind enemy lines in occupied Europe. One among many successful SOE projects developed at Station IX was the Welrod pistol. The Welrod was produced in two basic versions: the Mk II, firing the .32 ACP round, and the Mk I, chambered for the 9mm Parabellum. The Welrod was so named by combining the first three letters of the town Welwyn &#8211; Wel &#8211; with the English word “rod”.</p>



<p><strong>Model 1</strong></p>



<p>Preceding any successful invention there are always one or several prototypes, as is the case with the Welrod pistol. The following is a brief description of the Welrod’s predecessor, the Model-1. One of the more notable differences is found in the bolt action; a conventional reloading mechanism similar to that of the Mauser K98. The bolt itself has been tilted in a further downward angle, placing it snugly to the side of the pistol in order to prevent it from snagging on the operator’s clothing. The difference in the trigger also distinctly stands out as it is positioned on the left side of the pistol and therefore must be activated with a forward movement of the thumb. The last major difference has to do with the magazine. It is clad with wood and doubly functions as the pistol’s grip. It is noticeably shorter than on the later Mk II and is an integrated part of the pistol and thus not removable. This means that the pistol had to be loaded from the top and with the breech open, similar to the Mauser C96. Generally, the design was met with satisfaction, but the fact that the pistol had to be loaded from the top, the clumsy bolt-action system, the reduced grip upon trigger activation and the disproportionate size of the pistol grip all combined to redesign the construction around March 1943, ending with the model we know today as the Welrod Mk IIA. That the Welrod wasn’t merely for show has been demonstrated on numerous occasions and it was far from coincidental that it became the pistol that, for decades, set the standard for suppressed pistols.</p>



<p><strong>Variants</strong></p>



<p>The Mk II was air dropped to the resistance in several variants. The primary difference between the two basic models, the Mk II and Mk IIA, are the shape of the trigger and the trigger-guide. Also on the Mk II you can see that the ejector port was ground along the length of the weapon (oval shape) whereas on the post #3300 series the ejector port has been ground perpendicularly to the length of weapon (angular shape). Furthermore, lesser variations can occur on both basic models as the changes were made currently. Typically, these are things like the shape of the sights, the ejector port or the way the suppressor was packed; the number of spacers and baffles, etc. The alterations were solely made for reasons of production and had no influence on the functionality or use of the pistol. It should be noted that other variants than the above-mentioned can occur as these descriptions only adhere to the Welrods I have had the opportunity to study. According to a document from The National Archives UK, the Welrod was, in both 9mm and .32 ACP, tested along with 76 other devices during the period October 1. 1943 &#8211; October 10. 1944. Both versions received the grading “B” meaning “substantial modifications needed.” It is tempting to assume that these modifications resulted in the change of designation from Mk.II to Mk.IIA. Sadly the characters of the modifications were never specified in detail and why the question remains unanswered. The Welrod Mk I (9mm Parabellum) was equally produced in at least two variants: Type A and Type B. However, I have not been able to define with certainty the difference between the two.</p>



<p><strong>Description of Mk II and Mk IIA</strong></p>



<p>On the exterior, the pistol consists only of the tube which, including the breech, measures 12.2 inches. On to the tube is fitted an approximately 1 inch wide magazine housing. The housing fits a modified magazine from a Colt Pocket Model 1903 .32 ACP pistol. The modification consists of a little locking mechanism soldered onto the back of the magazine. When inserted into the magazine housing, the mechanism locks into a small square hole on the back of the housing. The magazine, sheathed in rubber (Ebonite), doubly functions as the pistol’s grip. Unfortunately, this system turned out to be inexpedient, as the operator in extreme cases risked accidentally activating the locking mechanism thus ejecting the magazine. The safety of the pistol is a so-called grip safety. When the grip is held correctly the safety device on the back of the grip will be deactivated and the weapon can be fired. The safety works by mechanically blocking the action of the trigger but not that of the firing pin. The trigger, best described as a bent nail, is, contrary to the Mk I, not protected by a trigger guard, meaning that it cannot simply be tucked into the belt without risking an accidental discharge. The sights are basic front and rear with the rear mounted in a dovetail with no adjustment alternative as the Welrod is pre-sighted from the factory. The pistol weights 2.4 pounds. Even though the magazine holds 8 rounds, the manual recommends the loading of 5 rounds maximum in order to ensure a reliable feed of the chamber upon reloading. The Mk II’s are bi-coloured in that the receiver is brownish. The Mk IIA pistols appear well made, sturdy of construction and without lavish detail. It is parkerized and the finish appears steely grey. The rubber magazine is black. With the magazine off, the pistol can pass for almost anything. It was quickly dubbed “The bicycle pump” due to its anonymous appearance. Several of the Mk IIA’s and Mk I’s inspected bear semblance of having been painted black. Several areas still have paint residue around the trigger, trigger-guide and magazine housing. If they actually at some point in time were black, the reason has yet to be determined.</p>



<p><strong>Function</strong></p>



<p>The pistol is a single-shot weapon but since it is operated, and basically functions as a bolt-action rifle, it is possible to reload and fire relatively fast. This is accomplished by twisting the knurled end of the breech 90 degrees counter clockwise and pulling it back approximately 1.5 inch until it reaches the stopping screw. This extracts and ejects the empty cartridge case vertically as with the Luger P.08. The breech is then pushed forward, stripping a round from the magazine and feeding it into the chamber, and at the same time cocking the firing pin. The pin is of the “floating” type, as we know it, among others, from the Luger P.08 and basically functions in the same manner. To lock the breech, twist the knurled end 90 degrees clockwise and the pistol is ready to fire. The breech has its two locking lugs placed to the rear, as opposed to modern rifles where the lugs are placed in front of the breech head. As there is no protruding grip on the breech, you can visually verify the correct locking by checking that the purpose made V-shaped notch on the knurled part is aligned with the V-shaped notch in the receiver just behind the rear sight. For cleaning or maintenance the stopping screw is unscrewed with a coin or screwdriver allowing the breech to be extracted from the receiver. Keeping in mind the purpose for which it was built, it is obvious why the Welrod had no place on the open battlefields. This statement is supported in the English manual from December 1943 where the reason for the shape of the nose cap is given as follows:&nbsp;<em>“The nose cap of the weapon is hollowed to enable an operator to place it tightly against the body of a person and fire. The noise is then still further reduced. This will allow the shooting of a man in a crowd with the minimum chance of detection. For this purposes, there is no question of any special training.”&nbsp;</em>In the same manual, the effective range in daylight is given to be 25 yards, and in darkness &#8211; hence the fluorescent coating on the sights &#8211; 7 to 10 yards. The manual does however recommend that the operational distance be kept to within 8 yards. A prerequisite for shooting at 25 yards is explained as follows: “For these deliberate shot, extreme accuracy is required. It can only be obtained by correct trigger squeeze, that is by gradual squeeze of the whole hand. With training and practice it will be found quite possible to get very accurate groups at the distances mentioned. The gun should be held with the thumb and forefinger as close up to the muzzle as possible, the pistol grip being held by the right hand no harder than is necessary to compress the safety catch. For standing shots, the left elbow should be held as close in to the body as possible.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="378" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-84.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9355" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-84.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-84-300x162.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-84-600x324.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The difference in the trigger guide and the trigger shape, along with its spring mechanism can be clearly seen with the Mk II above. It is also clearly visible how the grip safety connects with the trigger platform to prevent any accidental discharge.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Suppressor</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="371" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-77.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9356" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-77.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-77-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-77-600x318.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>An original washer set consisting of three linen/rubber washers in a canvas bag. Note the special washer removal tool. The pistol is a Mk II with the locking lugs clearly visible on the open breech.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The Welrod differentiates from others in that it is constructed around an integrated suppressor. The entire mechanism is built into an 11.8 inch metal tube with a diameter of 1.26 inches. The roughly 3.74 inch barrel ends in a bearing approximately halfway down the tube. Along the five-tracked rifling, 20 holes have been drilled with a 0.63 inch diameter, permitting the gases to escape into the containing cylinder housing functioning as an expansion chamber. The bearing, best described as a sort of baffle, is provided with 12 holes equally 0.63 inches in diameter, enabling the gases to further circulate from the expansion chamber and into the deflector system consisting of a series of baffles and washers. When fired, the projectile passes through 18 metal disc baffles separated by twelve 0.2 inch wide spacers and three rubber washers. The baffles are of course provided with a hole to allow the projectile to pass unobstructed, but it must be noted that four of the discs has a hole diameter of 0.5 inch while the other 14 are but 0.37 inches across. It is extremely important when replacing the baffles that the three baffles with the wider diameter are placed on the outside of the washers in order to allow the washer material to expand as they are penetrated by the projectile. Somewhat different is it with the three rubber washers who have no holes until penetrated by the very first shot. The purpose of these washers are to reseal themselves, if not entirely then as much as possible after the exit of the projectile, thus restraining the gases and forcing them into the deflector system. However, the washers are quickly worn resulting in a significant decrease in noise reduction. This has no greater tactical influence though as the Welrod was solely meant as a liquidation weapon. The speed of sound at a temperature of 15° Celsius (59° Fahrenheit) travels 1,115 fps. (340 m/s). For every single centigrade rise in temperature, the speed of sound increase accordingly by 1.6 fps. (0.5 m/s.) It is therefore important to maintain a certain tolerance between the muzzle velocity and the speed of sound if the optimal sound reduction is to be obtained. According to the manual, the Welrod delivers a 72-grain Kynoch projectile at a muzzle velocity of 920 fps. (280m/s).</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="402" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-63.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9357" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-63.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-63-300x172.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-63-600x345.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Shown here are the two V-shaped notches in the breech and the receiver. The notches must be aligned to ensure correct locking of the breech. Note how the Mk II (above) has more of an oval shaped ejector port as opposed to the Mk IIA (below) that is more angular. The dovetail mounted rear sights are fixed with a mandrel stamp.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="455" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-48.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9358" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-48.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-48-300x195.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-48-600x390.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Shown here is the stopping screw that ensures that the breech is not extracted from the receiver during the loading procedure. Note the right side rail guiding the trigger platform.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Decibel</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-40.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="268" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-40-300x268.jpg" alt="" data-id="9359" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-40.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/007-40/#main" class="wp-image-9359" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-40-300x268.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-40-600x536.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-40.jpg 700w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>The hollowed front nose cap of the Welrod suppressor as referred to in the manual.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-32.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="526" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-32.jpg" alt="" data-id="9360" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-32.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/008-32/#main" class="wp-image-9360" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-32.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-32-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-32-600x451.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>The Mk II (left) was fitted with a disproportionately long front sight compared to the later Mk IIA (right).</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-31.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-31-300x225.jpg" alt="" data-id="9361" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-31.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/009-31/#main" class="wp-image-9361" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-31-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-31-600x450.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-31.jpg 700w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Only on the first few models of the Mk II was the trouble taken to stamp the two end digits of the serial number onto the trigger platform. Note the completely different trigger guide consisting of the two screws on each side of the trigger platform.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p>The suppressor functions optimally within the first 10-15 rounds fired. The American OSS (Office of Strategic Services), according to a document dated February 12, 1945, performed a measurement on noise from suppressed weapons to help evaluate their own just finished prototype: the Hi-Standard Automatic Pistol calibre .380 ACP. All measurements are performed at a perpendicular angle 10 feet from the muzzle. From the document, the average noise level of the Welrod pistol was at 73 dB, Hi Standard .380 ACP at 81 dB and Hi-Standard .22LR at 71 dB. In comparison, a non-suppressed calibre .32 ACP pistol has a noise level of 105 dB. This equals, in the case of the Welrod, a noise reduction of approximately 32 dB. You need to keep in mind that the decibel scale is logarithmic as opposed to linear. From 1 dB to 3 dB you double the value, 6 dB you quadruple, 10 dB is tenfold the value and 20 dB a hundredfold. I, and many others, am of the opinion that the decibel factor is too intangible a notion to deal with, which is why I much prefer an audio/visual explanation and comparison. For this reason, the sound of a suppressed shot is best described as the sound of a .22LR percussion cap followed by the sound of a match being struck; the match sound being the gases slowly seeping from the suppressor. Should the operator choose to reload the weapon immediately upon discharge, the hissing sound of the gases will then be replaced by a dull “plop” as the gases are now released at once under pressure through the chamber. After firing 15 rounds or so, the efficiency of the suppressor is considerably reduced as the holes in the baffles are being worn to the size of the calibre itself. In many cases, an extraction tool together with a small canvas bag containing 3 spare washers was issued, permitting the operator to change these as the need arose.</p>



<p><strong>Acknowledgement</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-23.jpg" alt="" data-id="9362" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-23.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/010-23/#main" class="wp-image-9362" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-23.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-23-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-23-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>With the suppressor tube removed, the holes perforating the barrel can be clearly seen. Also not the holes in the bearing fitted onto the muzzle.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="446" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-18.jpg" alt="" data-id="9364" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-18.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/012-18/#main" class="wp-image-9364" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-18-300x191.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/012-18-600x382.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Diagram of the silencer assembly taken from the manual provided with the Welrod Mk IIA. Note the special washer extractor tool.</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="612" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-16.jpg" alt="" data-id="9363" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-16.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/011-16-2/#main" class="wp-image-9363" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-16-300x262.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/011-16-600x525.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="362" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-15.jpg" alt="" data-id="9365" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-15.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2006/01/01/the-welrod-pistol-part-1/013-15/#main" class="wp-image-9365" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-15.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-15-300x155.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/013-15-600x310.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>A visualized picture of the sound profile during the loading procedure and firing of the Welrod Mk IIA. The first short peak (1) is the breech being twisted into the open position. The second (2) is the withdrawal of the breech. (3) is the breech being slid forward and twisted back into the locked position. (4) is the shot, and (5) is the sound of the gases slowly, and under pressure, seeping from the suppressor. Observe that the shot itself is hardly louder than the loading procedure.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p><em>I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the following in no particular order: Mr. J. M. Ramos for allowing the use of his drawing in my article, Dr. J. David Truby, Dr. John W. Brunner and Mr. Ralph Hagan for contributing with their help and knowledge. Museum Inspector Esben Kjeldbaek and Storage Manager Soren Rasmussen, both of The Museum of Danish Resistance 1940-1945, Copenhagen. Police Inspector Ole Rasmussen and Weapons Technician Palle Larsen, both of the Federal Danish Police department of weapons technology.</em></p>



<p><em><strong>Editor’s note:</strong>&nbsp;Measuring equipment available in 1945 was incapable of accurately measuring sound levels, and measurements from then are approximately 45 dB lower than those obtained by modern MIL-STD procedures today.&nbsp;SAR&nbsp;published modern tests on the Welrod system in&nbsp;SAR&nbsp;Vol. 5 No. 11.</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V9N4 (January 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SWITCH NO. 10</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/switch-no-10/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N3 (Dec 2005)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switch No.10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V9N3]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Anders Thygesen DEVELOPMENT The Switch No.10, commonly known as the “time-pencil,” is a small and compact delayed-ignition device that could set off a detonator or a Bickford safety fuze. The switch originated in Germany in 1916, but the idea was later adopted by the Poles. It was on a trip to Poland in 1939 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Anders Thygesen</strong></em><br><br><strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong><br><br>The Switch No.10, commonly known as the “time-pencil,” is a small and compact delayed-ignition device that could set off a detonator or a Bickford safety fuze. The switch originated in Germany in 1916, but the idea was later adopted by the Poles. It was on a trip to Poland in 1939 that Brig. Colin McVean Gubbins brought an example of the time-pencil back home to England. Section D, the forerunner for the S.O.E. (Special Operation Executive), soon saw the potential of the time-pencil and hereafter Cdr. A.G. Langley further developed and improved it ending up with the product that we know today as the Switch No.10. It was widely used during the Second World War by S.O.E. operatives but certainly also by the O.S.S. (Office of Strategic Service). Around 18 million time-pencils were produced by S.O.E.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="554" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-60.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9143" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-60.jpg 554w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-60-237x300.jpg 237w" sizes="(max-width: 554px) 100vw, 554px" /><figcaption><em>Two stamped tin boxes each containing five time-pencils that were airdropped to the Danish resistance during the Second World War. On top, a roll of Bickford fuze with a crimped detonator and a safety match igniter all ready to go. Note the inserted No. 27 detonator in the white time-pencil to the right.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>DESCRIPTION</strong><br><br>It is generally understood that the glass ampoule contains acid and that it is the thickness of the steel wire that causes the various delays that are available in different time-pencils. This is, however, not the case. The steel wire has the same thickness regardless of the delay.<br><br>The pencil is composed of three different sections. The copper tube contains a clear glass ampoule filled with a green liquid being copper chloride and the brass tube is the housing for the striker, coil spring and a primer. Aluminium tubes can be found as a substitute for the common brass tube depending on who manufactured the pencils.<br><br>At the end of the brass tube, a spring snout is mounted, which allows a detonator No. 27 or a Bickford safety fuze to be inserted. The interior wall between the copper and brass tube is perforated by a 0.02 inch (0.5 millimetre) hole, in which the steel wire holding the striker under tension runs through. The other end of the wire is fixed to the screw and lead disk on the top of the copper tube. The total length of the pencil is 5 inches (127 millimetres), the diameter is 0.31 inch (8 millimetres) and the weight is 0.65 ounce (18.5 gram).</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="169" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-70.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9144" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-70.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-70-300x72.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-70-600x145.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Sectioned time-pencil. Note the thin steel wire running along the ampoule of copper chloride. The cotton lump is to protect the ampoule against hard handling. Also notice the circular inspection hole next to the safety strip. Shown from left: primer, striker, coil spring, ampoule, lead disk, and retaining screw with steel wire in between.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>FUNCTION</strong><br><br>Arming the time-pencil is done by squeezing the copper tube with the fingers, thereby crushing the glass ampoule inside. The solution of copper chloride is released and will immerse the steel wire. If the safety strip can then be removed without any friction, the time-pencil is armed. If the safety strip cannot be removed, it is because the steel wire has broken and thereby released the striker which is now resting on the safety strip under high tension caused by the spring. For ease of inspection, one or two inspection holes have been drilled next to the safety strip. The technical explanation of the process is that when the iron wire, a non-precious metal, is submerged into the copper chloride, an electrochemical transfer of the copper particles takes place. The copper will deposit on the iron wire and at the same time a corresponding amount of iron will be dissolved from the wire causing this to rapidly corrode and eventually break. The higher the concentration of copper chloride the faster it will corrode. The chemical formula is: Fe + Cu2+ -> Fe2+ + Cu.<br><br><strong>TIMINGS</strong><br><br>The period of delay is indicated by the color of the safety strip. The times given are for 59° Fahrenheit (15°celcius).</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Black: 10 minutes</li><li>Red: 30 minutes</li><li>White: 2 hours</li><li>Green: 5-1/2 hours</li><li>Yellow: 12 Hours</li><li>Blue: 24 Hours.</li></ul>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="302" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-68.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9145" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-68.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-68-300x129.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-68-600x259.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Time-pencil with an attached Bickford fuze with a No. 8 detonator crimped at the end, timed for action within 10 minutes. The advantage in using the Bickford fuse is that the operator will have a safety margin if the switch should fail and fire the second the safety strip is removed. A Bickford fuse burns 0.40 inch (1 centimetre) per second leaving enough time to extract the detonator from the explosive. Note the extracted black safety strip and the two inspections holes.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>It is extremely important to know that the delay varies according to temperature. At high temperatures, the delays are considerably shortened. Conversely, at lower temperatures, the delay is lengthened.<br><br>Each tin was packed with 5 pencils all with the same color code. It was then sealed with a colored strip of tape corresponding to the color on the safety strips. For illustration purposes in this article, the various colors in the tins have been mixed on purpose.<br><br>Today the time-pencils are very attractive items for the serious Second World War collector with prices easily ranging from $40 to $100 for each pencil; the blue and blacks being the rarest.<br></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V9N3 (December 2005)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
