<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Auto-Ordnance Corporation &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/auto-ordnance-corporation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:45:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Last Thompson</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-last-thompson/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V23N2 (Feb 2019)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General John Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Maguire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submachine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V23N2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Frank Iannamico Despite Its High Cost, Millions Were Made for the U.S. and the Allies in WWII The Thompson submachine gun was conceived by U.S. Army General John Thompson as a weapon to assault and clear out enemy trenches during World War I. Thompson formed the Auto-Ordnance Corporation to develop his submachine gun. World [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong><em>By Frank Iannamico</em></strong></p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator is-style-wide"/>



<div style="height:25px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p class="has-medium-font-size"><strong>Despite Its High Cost, Millions Were Made for the U.S. and the Allies in WWII</strong></p>



<div style="height:15px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p class="has-drop-cap"><strong><em>T</em></strong>he Thompson submachine gun was conceived by U.S. Army General John Thompson as a weapon to assault and clear out enemy trenches during World War I. Thompson formed the Auto-Ordnance Corporation to develop his submachine gun. World War I ended before the weapon went into production. After the post-war design was finalized, Auto-Ordnance, which had no facilities for mass production, subcontracted with Colt to manufacture the Thompson submachine gun. A total of 15,000 Thompson submachine guns were produced by Colt from 1921 to 1922. Sales were very disappointing; for all intents and purposes the concept was a failure though criminals of the day recognized the Thompson’s value. Police departments began to purchase Thompsons just so they would not be outgunned by gangsters. Many gangland shootings made the headlines in all the newspapers; the Thompson submachine gun was getting a very tainted reputation.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-228.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22391" width="525" height="304" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-228.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-228-300x174.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-228-600x347.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>A 1928A1 Thompson and a production M1 model (below). The M1 was less expensive to manufacture.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>By early 1939 when it appeared World War II was imminent, the Thompson submachine gun was nearly 20 years old. An entrepreneur by the name of Russell Maguire sensed that there would be a need for weapons when war came. Through some dubious tactics, Mr. Maguire was able to gain controlling interest in the floundering Auto-Ordnance Corporation.</p>



<p>World War II was a more fluid conflict than World War I had been. It would be a war where the submachine gun would play a significant role. Despite the design being over 20 years old, it was the only proven weapon that could be fielded quickly. However, once again Auto-Ordnance had no manufacturing capabilities. A forward-thinking Russell Maguire contracted with the Savage Arms Company to manufacture the Thompson for Auto-Ordnance. The first Thompsons made by Savage were similar to those made by Colt. Savage delivered the first completed guns to Auto-Ordnance in April 1940. Savage also manufactured many parts to supply Auto-Ordnance’s own factory in Bridgeport, Connecticut, that began manufacturing the M1928A1 model in August 1941.</p>



<p>The British Army, despite their resistance to what they referred to as “gangster guns,” was one of the first customers to order Thompsons. At this point, the United States had not yet entered the war. The United States was forced to enter World War II after the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. The U.S. Army began quickly growing, and weapons were needed to arm soldiers and Marines.</p>



<p>The U.S. government had on several occasions voiced concern over the .45 caliber submachine gun’s high price, which was costing the government the same as a Browning belt-fed machine gun. Savage and Auto-Ordnance were both aware that the Ordnance Department was seeking a less expensive submachine gun to replace the Thompson.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-228.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22392" width="525" height="356" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-228.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-228-300x203.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-228-600x406.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Likely the last M1A1 off the production line was this Thompson serial number 1244194; the number representing the total number of 1928 and M1s/M1A1s made by Savage. (SPRINGFIELD ARMORY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In November 1941, the engineering staff at Savage began conducting a study of how the M1928A1 model Thompson could be simplified. The engineers were looking for ways to decrease cost and increase production. Consuming much of the manufacturing effort was the receiver, more specifically, the rails inside of the receiver that the bronze Blish lock traveled on. The three-piece bolt/lock/actuator of the 1928 model was also labor intensive to manufacture. The engineers at Savage doubted that the locking device was necessary.</p>



<p><strong>A Less Complex Submachine Gun</strong></p>



<p>In late February 1942, a “simplified” prototype Thompson submachine gun conceived by Savage was ready to be submitted to the Ordnance Department for testing. The bolt assembly was a very simple rectangular block of steel. This allowed the receiver to be redesigned for easier manufacture and its width reduced. The inside of the receiver simply had a rectangular channel milled into it to accommodate the bolt. The bolt had been redesigned with two sear notches. This allowed the weapon’s safety lever to be engaged when the bolt was in the forward position on an empty chamber. Since drum-type magazines had proven unsuitable for military use, the new receivers eliminated the lateral slots on the sides of the magazine well for accommodating them.</p>



<p>Savage shipped the new weapon to Russell Maguire at the Auto-Ordnance Corporation headquarters. The Savage Corporation told Auto-Ordnance that it was submitting the redesigned Thompson, “Without any claims for compensation, reimbursement, royalty or patent interest.” The Auto-Ordnance engineering staff examined the new design and then submitted it to the Ordnance Department in March 1942. The new Thompson was sent to Aberdeen Proving Ground for testing and evaluation. After a few government recommended alterations to the prototype were made, the new Thompson was recommended for adoption as “Submachine Gun, Caliber .45 M1” on March 24, 1942.</p>



<p>The pilot rod for the recoil spring was simplified for easier manufacture and was held in place by a new type buffer. The M1’s pilot rod was made longer than those for the 1928 design to completely contain the spring. The M1’s pilot rod and buffer lessened the possibility of damaging the recoil spring during assembly and disassembly; a problem often encountered with the 1928 models.</p>



<p>The M1 featured a smooth barrel without the radial cooling fins or a threaded muzzle for a compensator. The rear sight installed on early production M1 Thompsons was the same simple unprotected “L” type. This design proved to be easily damaged and was replaced by a similar sight but with protective side “ears.”</p>



<p>By July 1942, Savage began delivery of the first new Thompson model, now designated as the M1 Submachine Gun. The Auto-Ordnance Bridgeport and Savage Arms factories both began production of the Thompson M1 model in July 1942. However, due to many technical problems experienced by the Bridgeport factory with the change over from the M1928A1 model, the actual manufacture of their M1s was delayed by several months.</p>



<p>While in July 1942, Savage had turned out 48,000 guns, Auto-Ordnance was struggling to meet its scheduled production mark. Contributing to the production delays were problems in deliveries of materials, equipment and tooling authorized by the government for M1 production.</p>



<p>After the M1 production finally commenced at Auto-Ordnance’s Bridgeport plant, more problems were encountered. The Springfield Ordnance District refused to accept any of the Auto-Ordnance Bridgeport-manufactured M1s because of the increase in their full-auto cyclic rate over the M1928A1 model. Officials from Washington, the district ordnance office and Auto-Ordnance engineers conducted studies and tests, all failing to provide a correction for the condition. Finally, on December 9, 1942, official notice from the Ordnance Department in Washington gave the district permission to waive the rate-of-fire requirement and accept the Bridgeport M1 guns. In the interim, the M1 Thompsons being produced at Savage were being accepted in large quantities by the Rochester Ordnance District without any problems.</p>



<p><strong>The M1A1 Model</strong></p>



<p>The Savage Arms Company continued attempts to further simplify the design by experimenting with a fixed firing pin model. The prototype was originally fitted with an M1 type bolt with a firing pin fixed in an extended or “in battery” position. The firing pin, spring, hammer and hammer pin were omitted. Later the “fixed” separate firing pin was eliminated and replaced by a fixed “firing pin” machined onto the bolt face.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-224.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22393" width="525" height="170" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-224.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-224-300x97.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-224-600x195.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>The presentation-grade M1A1 Thompson number 1244194 has a polished blue finish and hand-selected black walnut stock and grips. (SPRINGFIELD ARMORY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-213.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22394" width="525" height="170" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-213.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-213-300x97.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-213-600x194.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Other markings on the Thompson include the Auto-Ordnance name and Bridgeport, Connecticut address. As per their contract Savage was not permitted to place its company name on the Thompsons it manufactured for Auto-Ordnance. (SPRINGFIELD ARMORY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The Springfield Ordnance District was notified that manufacture of a fixed firing pin bolt for use in the M1 submachine gun was authorized. In order to distinguish between submachine guns equipped with separate firing pins and fixed firing pins, the submachine guns fitted with the fixed firing pin would be designated as “Gun, Submachine, Caliber .45, Thompson M1A1” (A1= Alteration 1).</p>



<p>By the time the Springfield Ordnance District began accepting the M1s made at the Bridgeport plant, the new Thompson M1A1 model had replaced the M1. Most of Auto-Ordnance M1 Thompsons were then upgraded to the M1A1 configuration and the A1 designation added by hand stamping “A1” on the receiver.</p>



<p>On earlier models, the forward motion of the bolt was stopped by the front of the bolt cavity in the receiver, a major factor in determining the length of the chamber. To increase reliability the cylindrical protrusion at the front of the M1A1 bolt was increased by .028-inch. With the longer front shank, the bolt’s forward motion was stopped by the cartridge seated in the barrel’s chamber unless the chamber was empty. The redesign ensured that the fixed firing pin would strike the primer with greater force, reducing misfires. However, the downside to the fixed firing pin design was that it increased the chance of an out of battery discharge of a cartridge.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-186.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22395" width="525" height="182" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-186.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-186-300x104.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-186-600x208.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>One less expensive alternative to the Thompson offered was Auto-Ordnance’s T2 submachine gun. The weapon performed poorly in the Aberdeen Proving Ground trials and was eliminated from consideration. The T2 was made in .45 and 9mm calibers. (F.C. LOGAN)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-171.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22396" width="525" height="179" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-171.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-171-300x102.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-171-600x204.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Another weapon briefly accepted to replace the Thompson was the Hyde-Inland M2 submachine gun made by Marlin. Problems delayed production, and the M3 was adopted before only a small number of M2s were manufactured. (F.C. LOGAN)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-140.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22397" width="525" height="161" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-140.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-140-300x92.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-140-600x183.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Another George Hyde submachine gun that was a serious contender in the Ordnance submachine gun trials was the Hyde 35. Note how many submachine guns of the period resembled the Thompson. (NATIONAL FIREARMS COLLECTION LEEDS, ENGLAND)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The cost for Savage to manufacture an M1 was $23.44. On February 24, 1942, Savage agreed to a contract to manufacture the M1 model for Auto-Ordnance at the cost of $36.37 per unit, providing Savage with a profit of $12.93 per gun. Auto-Ordnance then charged the U.S. government $43.00 for an M1 model and $42.94 for the M1A1 version, although the prices and profits varied slightly from contract to contract.</p>



<p><strong>Serial Numbers</strong></p>



<p>Unlike the 1928 Thompsons, the manufacturer’s initials, “AO” or “S,” were not used as a serial number prefix on the M1 series. To identify who made a particular M1 or M1A1 Thompson, the manufacturer stamped their code letters on the bottom of the receiver where the front grip mount is fitted. The letters used were “S,” which indicated Savage manufacture, or “A.O.C.” for weapons made at the Auto-Ordnance Bridgeport plant. As on the previous M1928A1 model, the Auto-Ordnance Corporation name and Bridgeport address are present on the receiver’s right side, regardless of who manufactured the weapon. Another change noted in the M1/M1A1 Thompson was the spelling of the word “caliber” on the receiver. The word was changed from the early spelling of “CALIBRE” to the U.S.-recognized spelling, “CALIBER.”</p>



<p>Savage-manufactured M1 and M1A1s were stamped with the Army Inspector of Ordnance’s initials of the Rochester, NY, Ordnance District. AIOs of the Rochester District were Lt. Colonel Ray L. Bowlin, using stamp “RLB,” and Colonel Frank J. Atwood, using stamp “FJA.” The Bowlin RLB marking is found only on the early M1 Thompsons. All Savage M1 and M1A1 submachine gun receivers and frames were also marked with the encircled “GEG” acceptance stamp of Auto-Ordnance’s civilian inspector at Savage’s factory, George E. Goll.</p>



<p>M1 and M1A1 Thompsons produced at the Auto-Ordnance plant in Bridgeport, Connecticut, would have the acceptance stamp of the Army Inspector of Ordnance of the Springfield District. Very early M1s would be marked with the stamp “WB”—Colonel Waldemar Broberg. Later production would be marked with the “GHD” stamp—Colonel Guy H. Drewery.</p>



<p>There have been many M1A1 trigger frames documented that do not have serial numbers. During repairs and rebuilds, the frames and receivers were often mismatched. This caused a lot of confusion when the weapons were stored in racks, and the frame number was mistakenly recorded instead of the receiver serial number. U.S. Ordnance specification AXS-725, dated January 7, 1943, called for a serial number to be marked, “Only on the receiver.” Subsequently, M1A1 frames manufactured after that date had no serial numbers applied. Arsenals were instructed to obliterate or remove serial numbers from the frames of the M1/M1A1 Thompsons. Due to the depth of the markings, the practice was soon discontinued.</p>



<p><strong>M1’s and M1A1’s Final Days</strong></p>



<p>In January 1943, the Ordnance Department announced to the Auto-Ordnance Corporation that the Thompson was going to be replaced by the newly developed U.S. M3 submachine gun. After the Ordnance Department’s official adoption of the M3 submachine gun, Thompson production was scheduled to be concluded in July 1943. Plans were made to begin tapering off production of the weapon. In April 1943, 62,948 M1A1 guns were manufactured; this was reduced to 55,000 in May and 51,667 in June. This left only 5,000 guns remaining to be manufactured in July 1943 from existing contracts. Authority was then received from the Ordnance Department in June to procure an additional 60,000 weapons by the end of August. Before the end of August, more orders for the Thompson gun were received from Washington. A total of approximately 119,091 additional Thompson M1A1 models were to be manufactured, providing continuance of production through December 1943. At the end of December, there were enough parts remaining to assemble approximately 4,500 additional guns. In January 1944 authorization was granted to complete the remaining guns by February 15, 1944. Production briefly resumed in February, completing a total of 4,092 additional guns. On February 15, 1944, the very last M1A1 Thompson submachine gun was accepted by the government via contract W-478-ORD-1949.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-116.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-22398" width="525" height="368" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-116.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-116-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-116-600x420.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>The Thompson was replaced with the M3 “grease gun” which only cost $20.94 each to manufacture. Many troops had a difficult time turning in their Thompsons, made from milled forgings, for the stamped sheet-metal M3. The M3 also had much a slower cyclic rate than the Thompson; most troops felt that a fast cyclic rate made weapons more effective. The Ordnance Department disagreed.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The Savage Arms Corporation manufactured an estimated total of 464,800 M1 and M1A1 model Thompsons, while the Auto-Ordnance Bridgeport plant turned out an estimated 249,555 M1s and M1A1s. A presentation-grade M1A1 Thompson was made by Savage. The serial number represented the total number of 1928 and M1/M1A1 Thompson submachine guns made by Savage: 1,244,194 from April 1940 until February 15, 1944. The number does not include the Thompsons made by Auto-Ordnance’s Bridgeport factory.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center"><strong>••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••</strong></p>



<p><em>Article excerpted from the book American Thunder III, available from Chipotle Publishing LLC.</em></p>



<p><em>Special thanks to Curator Alex MacKenzie and the entire staff at the Springfield Armory National Historic Site.</em><br>Springfield Armory National Historic Site<br>Springfield, MA<br>413-271-3976<br><a href="https://www.nps.gov/spar/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.nps.gov/spar</a></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V23N2 (February 2019)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>REPRODUCTION 1929 THOMPSON SUBMACHINE GUN CATALOG</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/reproduction-1929-thompson-submachine-gun-catalog/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catalogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V15N4 (Jan 2012)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1929]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catalog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submachine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis Jr.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=21028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The slogan displayed on the front of the 1929 Commercial Price List and Catalog, Superior means for the protection of Lives and Property, is indicative of another marketing attempt by Auto-Ordnance Corporation (AOC) to sell the Thompson gun. One of their first catchphrases, The Most Effective Portable Fire Arm In Existence, had run its course. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="439" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-133.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-21031" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-133.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-133-300x176.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-133-600x351.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>Picture taken from page 15 of the recently discovered reproduction Auto-Ordnance Corporation 1929 Commercial Price List and Catalog. Note the excellent picture quality.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The slogan displayed on the front of the 1929 Commercial Price List and Catalog, Superior means for the protection of Lives and Property, is indicative of another marketing attempt by Auto-Ordnance Corporation (AOC) to sell the Thompson gun. One of their first catchphrases, The Most Effective Portable Fire Arm In Existence, had run its course. The old stand-by maxim, On The Side Of Law And Order, was still in use but AOC must have felt the need for something new in 1929 &#8211; eight years after the introduction of the Thompson submachine gun.</p>



<p>The 1929 catalog, as it has come to be known by collectors, was double the size of previous catalogs. It was filled with a lot of pictures and interesting information on the Thompson gun &#8211; all in all a very nice product. Most 1929 catalogs measure 12” x 9” but there is some slight variation in size with different printings, i.e., the E.E. Richardson (a well known AOC salesman) marked 1929 catalog.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-133.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-21032" width="416" height="563" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-133.jpg 554w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-133-222x300.jpg 222w" sizes="(max-width: 416px) 100vw, 416px" /><figcaption><em>Picture taken from page 15 of the recently discovered reproduction Auto-Ordnance Corporation 1929 Commercial Price List and Catalog. Note the excellent picture quality.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>This is a very desirable item for Thompson paper collectors, one that is hard to find and usually expensive when found. It is not uncommon for original 1929 catalogs in excellent condition to sell for over $500. The survival rate for the 1929 catalog does not appear to be anywhere near that of the 1936 Nassau Street catalog.</p>



<p>As with most things Thompson if there are not enough originals to satisfy demand, reproduction items will soon enter the market place. This is exactly what happened with the 1929 catalog. Reproductions sold years ago from Ray Riling Arms and Frontier Press are well known by Thompson enthusiasts. While both of these catalogs are professionally marked as reproductions by the printer, it is very easy for a paper collector to determine by the quality of print and pictures that these two reproduction catalogs are not original. However, these reproductions do fill a void in most collections and allow for reading without the possibility of damaging an original.</p>



<p>Such was the universe for the 1929 catalog &#8211; until recently. Last year, what appeared to be original 1929 AOC catalogs unexpectedly hit the market. The picture quality was excellent and it was obvious the catalog had some age. Touted as original catalogs by sellers, many of whom had probably never seen an original 1929 catalog, the price began to rise.</p>



<p>This author made a purchase and was very pleased when the package first arrived. However, upon careful inspection there was something about this catalog that seemed amiss. There were definite signs of aging around the corners and the staples had started to rust &#8211; but the color was just not right. The cover on an original 1929 catalog is more of a brownish color; the cover on these “new” 1929 catalogs is more of an off-white color. Fortunately, Small Arms Review writer David Albert lives only a short distance away. David is the co-author of the book, Thompson Manuals, Catalogs and Other Paper Items. He has a very extensive Thompson paper collection, including an original 1929 catalog.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-129.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-21033" width="410" height="563" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-129.jpg 547w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-129-219x300.jpg 219w" sizes="(max-width: 410px) 100vw, 410px" /><figcaption><em>Cover of an original 1929 catalog. (See arrow): Note how the background color is more widespread on an original catalog and extends to the sling of the Thompson gun.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>A side by side comparison soon illustrated that this “new” 1929 catalog was not quite the quality of an original. To be certain, it was a piece of excellent work though the color difference of the cover was quite pronounced when the documents were laid side by side. In addition, the background color or shading (on the cover) is much more pronounced on the original catalog. Unfortunately, many Thompson paper collectors do not have ready access to a known original. And pictures from the best reference books allow only a preliminary comparison of the cover.</p>



<p>An investigation into where these “new” 1929 catalogs originated from proved interesting but was not definitive. Several sellers were contacted and a central theme in all stories soon developed: Atlanta, Georgia. Every story included reference to an estate sale and how the catalogs were stored in a “wooden crate” or “wooden box” and never released for sale. There were similarities to all the stories and the sellers were definitely not experts in the Thompson world. They were in the business of buying and re-selling items for a profit. All spoke freely and did not appear to be withholding information. The estate sale in one story involved a decedent in Florida who previously lived in upstate New York. Aside from the catalogs and a lot of sawdust, the wooden box purportedly contained several Thompson bolts, barrels and two receivers. The receivers were dispatched to the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico and all the other parts sold. The wooden box featured a Thompson bullet logo and was later sold to a collector in the Atlanta area. A guesstimate from all the sellers as to the number of catalogs found was somewhere around 200.</p>



<p>The time had come to involve some professionals in the investigation who work with paper everyday; one a book binder specializing in the repair of older books and one a printer.</p>



<p>The book binder said the catalog was definitely older. It was not printed last week. He pointed out the rusty staples and places on the paper around the edges that were indicative of the natural aging process. He did not think it was printed in the 1920’s. However, he believed the catalog was at least 20 years old.</p>



<p>As any good investigator will tell you it is better to be lucky than good. I got very lucky with the printer because he is a letterpress printer that still prints with letterpress &#8211; not something commonly found today. After examining the 1929 catalog in question for 10 to 15 minutes, he stated without reservation it was a reproduction. He went on to say the original 1929 catalog was most likely printed with letterpress. He pointed out the way in which the catalog is laid out with all the inside borders is very indicative of using print blocks with the old style letterpress; a very common method of printing in the twenties.</p>



<p>Looking closely at the pictures in the catalog, the printer believed most if not all the pictures were second generation. He pointed out how the printing in the title, “Thompson Guns,” was a little light in places. He said the amount of ink it took to make the title completely black and deep in the original catalog would have had a negative effect on the Thompson gun on the cover picture (in the reprint), turning it very dark. When the cover was copied for reprinting, the title lost some of its definition and this is plainly visible in the reprinted cover. (The difference in the depth of the color in the title on the cover page was evident during the examination David and I performed, but we did not know how to quantify our suspicions; now we know.) The printer was positive this “new” 1929 catalog was printed using the more modern offset printing. He agreed the pictures in this newly found 1929 catalog were very clear and said whoever printed it most likely copied it from an original 1929 catalog. The reason a lot of modern reproduction documents are so bad is a 3rd generation (or more) document is used in the reproduction process. The catalog does show signs of natural aging. He said it could have been white paper when new and faded to the current off-white color but this is really just speculation on his part. He believes it to be an older catalog, most likely printed in the 1950s. He had no reservation saying it was 50 to 60 years old.</p>



<p>During the ensuing investigation several more catalogs were examined and procured. One catalog had an obvious printing defect on the cover; others had defects on the inside pages. If contemplating the purchase of one of these newer 1929 catalogs, be sure and examine all pages.</p>



<p>The original 1929 catalog as released by AOC does not reference the Model of 1928 Thompson, the U.S. Navy Model. This was soon corrected with a one page document titled, “(Insert for 1929 Catalog),” which showcased this very popular Thompson variation. Original 1929 catalogs on the market today can be found with or without this insert. There is no evidence whoever reprinted this newer 1929 catalog also reprinted this insert page, and they may not have known it existed.</p>



<p>The quest for all things Thompson sometimes will yield a new discovery and that is what makes every search worthwhile. An original 1929 Commercial Price List and Catalog is a great addition to any paper collection. Unfortunately, the number of surviving copies appears to be low and the prices high. This high quality 1929 catalog reprint will make a great addition to a collection and may actually become a collectable in its own right someday. But don’t be fooled into paying a high price right now. Or believing it to be an original!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V15N4 (January 2012)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THOSE WEST HURLEY THOMPSON PARTS</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/those-west-hurley-thompson-parts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V15N2 (Nov 2011)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ira Trast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numrich Arms Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V15N2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Hurley]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=19726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thompson submachine gun enthusiasts simply use the phrase, “West Hurley’s.” By most accounts they are the scourge of the Thompson community &#8211; sometimes with good reason. They are nothing like the Colt’s in beauty or manufactured like the World War II guns to exacting government specifications. But they are a brother none the less to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div style="height:10px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p>Thompson submachine gun enthusiasts simply use the phrase, “West Hurley’s.” By most accounts they are the scourge of the Thompson community &#8211; sometimes with good reason. They are nothing like the Colt’s in beauty or manufactured like the World War II guns to exacting government specifications. But they are a brother none the less to their earlier siblings, though some would argue a step-brother.</p>



<p>The first West Hurley Thompson’s rolled off the assembly line in 1975 as a product of the second Auto-Ordnance Corporation in West Hurley, New York. This was a company started by Numrich Arms Corporation (NAC) founder George Numrich and then President of NAC, Ira Trast. The new Auto-Ordnance Corporation (AOC) was formed to begin production of a new semiautomatic .45 caliber Thompson rifle, one that resembled the famous American Tommy Gun. In conjunction with the Thompson semiautomatic rifle, AOC also put back in production the full auto 1928 model with a newly manufactured receiver and frame. Full auto West Hurley (WH) Thompson’s immediately found a niche market as an inexpensive substitute for a Colt, Savage or Auto-Ordnance at Bridgeport. The initial retail price as shown in the 1975 NAC catalog was $425.</p>



<p>All references to the Auto-Ordnance Corporation or AOC in this story relate solely to the new Auto-Ordnance Corporation at West Hurley, New York unless followed by the words “at Bridgeport” (Connecticut).</p>



<p>The full auto WHs were mostly Model of 1928s, but a small quantity of M1A1 models were produced right before what has come to be called the May 1986 machine gun ban. WHs have continued to enjoy a niche market in the post 1986 period because, again, they are the cheapest Thompsons in the market place. While many purists howled and degraded the efforts of Numrich and Trast in the 1970s, everyone will agree AOC did place over 3,800 more transferable Thompson’s in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) for all to use and enjoy. Absent a few post sample guns built from various other manufacturers from time to time, the WH full auto Thompson’s are the end of an era.</p>



<p>The purpose of this story is not to degrade the manufacturing process of a very small American company that produced a $425 machine gun. It is to inform owners and potential owners of full auto WH Thompsons about some of the parts used during the production &#8211; and problems associated with those parts.</p>



<p>AOC certainly could have used the United States Postal Service motto for flat rate shipping &#8211; “If it fits, it ships.” Standardization is not a word normally used by WH owners. Each WH Thompson is truly unique when it comes to fit, function AND parts. There is no WH specific production year or serial number range that is the best to buy &#8211; or any to be avoided. A NIB (New in the Box) WH is not a guarantee a WH Thompson will run; it only means no one has tried it out.</p>



<p>The majority of WH parts examined for this story are of low quality investment casting and do not conform to original ordnance specifications. Even when manufactured correctly, the resulting part is much rougher and softer than an original Colt or GI part. Many WH parts are easy to identify because of the purplish hue. Some cast parts are challenging to properly blue because of silicone that is added to the steel alloy to improve the flow when the molten steel is poured into the mold.</p>



<p>The saving grace is all the WH parts will interchange with GI manufactured parts. Replacement for most is always the best option.</p>



<p><strong>Danger!!!</strong></p>



<p>One part in particular is dangerous. The 1928 buffer pilot, commonly referred to as only the pilot or the buffer, was originally designed as a one piece machined part. Sometime during production of the WH Thompson, AOC designed and manufactured two-piece pilots. The reason the pilot was originally designed as a one piece part can be seen in the accompanying pictures; WH pilot’s can and will come apart. All owners, including dealers stocking used Model of 1928 WH Thompsons for sale, need to check the pilot (right now) to insure it is of one piece construction or a GI part. Any two-piece WH pilot should be destroyed. Why risk the potential for injury over what is now a readily available and inexpensive part.</p>



<p><strong>West Hurley Parts</strong></p>



<p>Most WH parts do not pose a threat of bodily injury but can and do affect the function of a Thompson. Stated below is a listing of known parts manufactured by or for AOC:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Actuator (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Barrel</li><li>Bolt (M1A1 model only)</li><li>Breech Oiler (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Buffer Pilot &#8211; (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Butt Stock Slide Group (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Compensator (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Drum magazines (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Frame</li><li>Grip Mount</li><li>Magazine Catch</li><li>Rear Sight, adjustable (Model of 1928 only)</li><li>Rocker pivot (fire control lever)</li><li>Safety</li><li>Sear</li><li>Sear lever</li><li>Trip</li><li>Vertical Fore Grip &amp; Pistol Grip Many WH parts can be easily identified because of the lack of manufacturer markings. All U.S. government subcontractors during World War II were required to apply a marking to their production; while “S” and “AOC” (at Bridgeport) are the most common subcontractor markings, many others exist. A great reference for manufacturer markings on Thompson parts can be found in Frank Iannamico’s excellent Thompson book, American Thunder II. Careful examination and comparison of WH parts to known GI originals make distinguishing these parts an easy matter. CAVEAT: Original parts manufactured by Colt are also unmarked; Colt parts have been found on WH Thompsons.</li></ul>



<p><strong>Mr. Trast</strong></p>



<p>Mr. Ira Trast, retired president of Auto-Ordnance Corporation, West Hurley, New York, graciously agreed to be interviewed. He stated at the beginning that due to the passage of time, he has probably forgotten many of the day to day production details that would be of interest to collectors nowadays. But he agreed to provide whatever information he could remember. Mr. Trast pointed out the new AOC was manufacturing both Thompson rifles and submachine guns so he was not focused solely on the production of the full auto guns during his tenure as President.</p>



<p>Mr. Trast stated the production of the receivers and frames were subcontracted to a local company in Saugerties, New York named Quality Manufacturing Company. AOC supplied Quality Manufacturing with the tooling for production of these parts. The tooling was quite old and had to be modified to fit Quality’s machines.</p>



<p>AOC had a large inventory of Thompson parts when production of the first Thompson guns began in 1975. The first full auto Thompsons were made using all GI parts but as sales increased, inventories of GI parts began to dry up. Mr. Trast spent many hours scouring the country looking for many of the Thompson parts mentioned during this interview. Mr. Trast stated it is important to point out GI parts were not only used in the beginning, but as available during the 11 years the full auto Thompson was in production. AOC only used their own subcontracted parts until new supplies of GI parts could be found. Toward the end of the production run, there was really no need to look for GI parts because none were available in any quantity.</p>



<p>The early Thompson guns featured original Lyman rear sights but soon supplies began to run low. Mr. Trast believes it possible AOC may have used some sight bases purchased from the Model Gun Corporation (MGC) of Japan on the full auto WH Thompson but he is not 100% sure. Sometimes parts used on the Thompson Model 1927 rifle were used on the full auto guns &#8211; and vise versa. He is certain that AOC soon subcontracted the manufacture of the sight base and these bases were fitted with an Enfield sight leaf assembly. Later, AOC had a sight leaf assembly specifically manufactured for the base. Mr. Trast remembered the cast sight bases would sometimes come loose from the receiver so AOC began using large rivets to correct this problem.</p>



<p>The horizontal fore-grips and sling swivels were very plentiful as were the butt stocks. Rear grips were plentiful at first, but later had to be manufactured. All the vertical fore-grips were made by a subcontractor, the identity of which now escapes Mr. Trast. As the stock slide inventory was depleted, aluminum stock slides from MGC were used. The MGC slides were not without problems so AOC began subcontracting the manufacture of the stock slide in the GI pattern but of aluminum alloy.</p>



<p>Many of the smaller parts like sears, trips, rocker pivots and safeties were manufactured by IONA Industries, Newburgh, New York. While AOC used other subcontractors at times, Quality Manufacturing Company and IONA Industries were the two subcontractors that manufactured the majority of parts for AOC. Both were located close to West Hurley, New York (and both are now out of business). Generally, Quality Manufacturing manufactured the bigger parts and IONA Industries manufactured the smaller parts. Mr. Trast stated there may be variations or changes of the same AOC part as production continued over the years.</p>



<p>Mr. Trast did not recall a problem or any issues with separation involving the two piece buffer pilot. AOC used GI buffer discs.</p>



<p>Compensators were another item that was soon in short supply and the manufacture of this part was subcontracted to IONA Industries. AOC roll marked the Thompson bullet logo on the top of the newly manufactured compensators in-house. Mr. Trast stated AOC had all the original Thompson roll dies starting at the Colt era. However, the older machinery necessary to use these early roll dies was not readily available and therefore many of the original dies could not be used. AOC had to remanufacture some tooling and dies when production began in 1975.</p>



<p>The supply of breech oilers also became a problem. Mr. Trast said AOC manufactured a few oilers, but “could not get it right.” The oilers manufactured were discarded. He does not remember purchasing any aftermarket oilers for use in the full auto guns but added this was a long time ago so anything is certainly possible. With no oilers available, a decision was made to delete this part altogether.</p>



<p>AOC refinished and sold GI drums at first. Supplies soon ran low and it became difficult to locate GI drums that were not too pitted and/or rusted and could be refinished into an acceptable product. AOC purchased and converted MGC drums to work in real guns. These first drums were named the XL drums, but the modifications only allowed for the loading of 39 rounds. AOC also used MGC drums for their .22 caliber Thompson by welding a .22 stick magazine inside the drum body.</p>



<p>A decision was made to manufacture new drums but it was almost two years before the new L (50 round) drums were on the market. This was a major effort for AOC that ran into many problems, especially with the rotor spring. AOC formed a new company for this venture, Valentine International. A decision to manufacture the C (100 round) drum came later. It was believed only 1,000 Colt era C drums were manufactured with each one being individually numbered. Mr. Trast believed AOC limited production to only 1,000 numbered C drums. As with the AOC L drum, the rotor spring became a big issue on the AOC C drum.</p>



<p>AOC manufactured the barrels for the Thompson guns in-house. Completed barrels were sent to a subcontractor to cut the fins and thread the ends of the barrels for the receiver and compensator. Mr. Trast remembered the early barrels with the large fins and sharp edges. AOC developed a tool to radius the sharp edges of the fins; this procedure was done in-house. As production continued, the later barrels were much nicer than AOC’s first efforts in this area. Mr. Trast does not remember if the front sight was manufactured in-house or by a subcontractor.</p>



<p>Mr. Trast recalled the purplish parts and how the bluing process was a problem for AOC. He believed the problem may have had something to do with impurities in the steel used to manufacture the parts. AOC always purchased high quality 4140 gun barrel steel but sometimes it came from outside the USA. He said it was a continual effort to properly color the parts.</p>



<p>The supply of bolts became an issue when the AOC M1 Thompson was introduced in 1985. As supplies of M1A1 GI bolts were exhausted, AOC subcontracted out the production of the M1A1 bolt.</p>



<p>As the interview came to an end Mr. Trast made a comment that will be of great interest to all WH owners. The “A” at the end of the serial number on the full auto Thompsons stood for “automatic.” Mr. Trast believes the ATF asked AOC to use this designation to easily differentiate the serial numbers of the full auto guns from the Thompson rifles.</p>



<p><strong>Parts, Parts and More Parts</strong></p>



<p><strong>Actuator</strong>: This is a commonly found WH part with several known variations. Careful examination will reveal a casting line down the middle in many of them. Most WH actuators have what appear to be milled cavities in the side; however, later variations were machined from bar and are without these cavities. The cocking ball on the unrelieved WH actuators is actually a separate part and staked to the body of the actuator. This can be another dangerous part. One WH owner reported the cocking ball came off during firing and hit him in the head nearly requiring stitches (another excellent reason for everyone anywhere near a firing line to always wear shooting glasses). There are also differences noted in the knurling on the cocking balls; some are plain or without knurling. The WH actuator can cause functioning problems and bend or break during firing; it should be replaced with an original GI part.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-33.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19736" width="375" height="317" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-33.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-33-300x253.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-33-600x506.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>Three cast WH actuators. From top to bottom: smooth finish plain ball, rough finish plain ball, and rough finish knurled ball &#8211; all with cavities in the sides. Bottom is a machined actuator with staked diamond knurled ball.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-33.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19740" width="316" height="375" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-33.jpg 632w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-33-253x300.jpg 253w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-33-600x712.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 316px) 100vw, 316px" /><figcaption><em>WH milled actuator with staked ball. Note how the ball is loose and actually turned slightly on the actuator body.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-32.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19742" width="563" height="123" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-32.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-32-300x66.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-32-600x131.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px" /><figcaption><em>WH actuator cocking balls: From left to right: smooth finish plain ball, rough finish plain ball, rough finish diamond knurled ball, cylindrical band diamond knurled ball and straight knurled ball (this actuator also has cavities in the actuator body). More types may exist.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Barrel</strong>: This is a commonly found WH part with several known variations. The fins on many of the early WH barrels are very sharp. Sharp edges and corners are characteristics of many WH parts. However, later production WH barrels can be found with radius fins. Most WH barrels are known to have head spacing or chamber issues. If all WH internal parts have been replaced with GI parts and functioning problems continue, a WH barrel may be the cause of the problem. Cosmetic issues aside, this part may be used if brought back into proper specification.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19743" width="563" height="174" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-29.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-29-300x93.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-29-600x186.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px" /><figcaption><em>Two 1928 WH barrels. The top barrel was removed from WH No. 770A. The fins are large and sharp to the touch. The fins on the bottom barrel of WH No. 1688A are smaller and rounded &#8211; a better looking product.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Bolt</strong>: As supplies of GI M1A1 bolts became exhausted, AOC subcontracted the manufacture of M1A1 bolts. WH bolts do not have a manufacturer code as found on the WWII GI bolts. The quality of the WH bolts has been reported as both good and bad. Given the large number of inexpensive GI M1 and M1A1 bolts now available on the market, this part is a good candidate for replacement. AOC did not manufacture bolts for the 1928 WH Thompson.</p>



<p><strong>Breech Oiler</strong>: AOC used GI oilers until the supply was exhausted and then simply omitted this part with new production guns. AOC included a notification to this effect on many of the later WH Thompsons. Research has uncovered an inexpensive oiler that has been found is several WH Thompsons, including a new in the box WH Thompson purchased in 1981. It is very possible AOC purchased and used some aftermarket oilers at some point during the production run. Irrespective of how these oilers ended up in WH Thompson’s, this oiler type is a good candidate for replacement.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-25.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19744" width="375" height="179" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-25.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-25-300x143.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-25-600x286.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>An aftermarket or non-GI breech oiler.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Buffer Pilot (Model of 1928 only)</strong>: This is a commonly found WH part with three known variations. The two-piece WH buffer pilots must be replaced &#8211; see above. It is dangerous to use this part in a Thompson submachine gun. One of the two-piece WH pilots has the flange press fit on the rod; the other has a cut out in the flange that locks on to the rod. AOC did manufacture a one piece pilot; however, like most WH parts it is not manufactured to GI specifications and should be replaced.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-22.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19746" width="563" height="182" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-22.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-22-300x97.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/006-22-600x194.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px" /><figcaption><em>This is the end result when a WH buffer pilot comes apart. Aside from risk of injury, disassembly can be very problematic. Who says expensive shooting glasses are not a good investment?</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-15.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19749" width="375" height="322" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-15.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-15-300x258.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/007-15-600x515.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>Shown are three types of WH buffer pilots. The pilots on the left and middle are two piece units. Inset picture on left with arrow reveals how the flange was fitted on the rod. The flange and rod on the middle pilot have separated. The pilot on the right is a one piece unit. Inset picture on right reveals nubs left on the end of the pilot as it was separated or parted from bar after being turned on a lathe. Also shown is a grey colored GI buffer disc. While this disc is serviceable, aftermarket replacement discs made from modern material will offer greater protection to the WH Thompson receiver.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>If there is any doubt as to the buffer pilot being a one or two piece unit, replace the pilot with a GI part (that will be marked with “S” or “AOC” (at Bridgeport) on the flat part of the flange). Don’t take a chance with this part!</p>



<p><strong>Butt Stock Slide Group</strong> <strong>(Model of 1928 only)</strong>: When the inventory of steel GI stock slides ran out, AOC purchased from MGC an aluminum butt stock slide group. There are two variations of the MGC slide. MGC assemblies are not manufactured to the exterior dimensions of the GI or Colt assembly and are easy to identify because the top of the rear mounting screw is visible. MGC slides also have a separate catch button. AOC soon learned the MGC slide was not meeting expectations and began production of a GI style stock slide cast off aluminum (or a light weight alloy). As with the MGC slide, the fit of the WH stock slide to the lower frame is generally very loose and the painted finish is quickly worn off. While serviceable, aluminum stock slides are good candidates for replacement.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image is-style-default"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19754" width="259" height="375" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-11.jpg 518w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/008-11-207x300.jpg 207w" sizes="(max-width: 259px) 100vw, 259px" /><figcaption><em>Butt stock slide groups as found on WH Thompsons. Top and middle assemblies were procured from MGC by AOC &#8211; note with the middle assembly how the butt stock catch attaches to the stock reinforcing rod. Bottom assembly is a WH manufactured slide that broke during use.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Compensator (Model of 1928 only)</strong>: This is a commonly found WH part with two known variations. It is easily distinguished from the Colt and WWII counterparts. The only marking is the trademark Thompson Bullet Logo displayed on the top of the compensator in front of the slots. The slots are usually sharp. WH compensators were not pinned from the factory and usually installed with a good dose of adhesive (as were the barrels). This WH part is quite functional and generally only replaced because the owner prefers the look of an original GI part.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/009-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19755" width="375" height="287" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/009-9.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/009-9-300x229.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/009-9-600x458.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>Two WH compensators. The differences between the two types, probably from different production runs, is the front edge (see arrows) of the boss that screws onto the barrel; one edge is rounded, one flatter. Note: The bottom compensator contains a set screw; this was a common field modification to lock the compensator in place when the adhesive used during production failed to hold.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Drum magazines</strong>: Most WH L and C drum magazines need work to run properly. WH drums were bringing a premium price during the 10 year assault rifle and high capacity magazine ban; this has passed. Avoid these drums unless you factor in the cost of an overhaul. Lower cost alternatives now exist. WH drums are easy to identify because the center hub is solid. In addition to the L and C drums, AOC also marketed an XL and X drum.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/010-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19756" width="563" height="388" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/010-9.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/010-9-300x207.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/010-9-600x414.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px" /><figcaption><em>A WH Type L drum, front (with winding key removed) &amp; back. The solid center hub or shaft on WH drums makes for easy identification.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Frame</strong>: These have sharp edges and are often found to be not manufactured to exact GI specifications. However, this part is normally serviceable and can often be brought into GI specifications. Frames were not serial numbered by AOC.</p>



<p><strong>Grip Mount</strong>: Grip mounts used on WH guns include the following variations:</p>



<div class="wp-block-image is-style-default"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/011-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19757" width="375" height="291" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/011-7.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/011-7-300x232.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/011-7-600x465.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>Two WH 3/4 inch Grip Mounts. The top mount is aluminum; the bottom is steel. Note how the retaining block or stud on the bottom mount has sheared off.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>GI milled (solid stock), 1/2 inch</li><li>GI riveted, early (retaining stud is a separate part), 1/2 inch</li><li>GI riveted, late (retaining and barrel rest studs are separate parts), 1/2 inch</li><li>WH riveted, steel, 3/4 inch</li><li>WH riveted, aluminum, 3/4 inch The 3/4 inch grip mount is the most commonly found. While most are serviceable for sporting use, the WH 3/4 inch aluminum parts are particularly prone to breakage. The milled steel (solid stock) grip mount is the best for every purpose.</li></ul>



<p><strong>Magazine Catch</strong>: This is a commonly found WH part with several known variations. Some have holes and a cast diamond pattern on the end; some have a dimple instead of a hole. Many are purple in color or have a purplish hue. This part can be a source of trouble and should be replaced with an original GI part.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/012-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19758" width="375" height="282" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/012-7.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/012-7-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/012-7-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>Three variations of the West Hurley magazine catch. Two catches have a hole, one is without a hole; one is painted black, two are purplish in color. An example of poor AOC craftsmanship can be seen in the top catch where the rod is attached to the catch body.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Rear Sight (adjustable) (Model of 1928 only)</strong>: The serviceability of the WH rear sight is not as good as the original Lyman. Various parts were used to make up sights, including the following combinations:</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/014-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19760" width="317" height="375" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/014-6.jpg 634w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/014-6-254x300.jpg 254w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/014-6-600x710.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 317px) 100vw, 317px" /><figcaption><em>An early steel WH rear sight. It looks identical to the more common alloy version.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Original Lyman sight assemblies</li><li>Lyman bases with Enfield Leaf assemblies</li><li>WH steel bases with Lyman leaf assemblies</li><li>WH steel or light alloy bases with Enfield leaf assemblies</li><li>WH steel or light alloy bases with WH leaf assemblies</li></ul>



<p><strong>Rocker Pivot (fire control lever) and Safety</strong>: These are commonly found WH parts. Careful examination will show a casting line down the middle. Most have a purplish hue. Functioning problems can occur if the pivot and safety move up and down while the Thompson is being fired. These parts should be replaced with original GI parts.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/015-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19761" width="291" height="375" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/015-8.jpg 581w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/015-8-232x300.jpg 232w" sizes="(max-width: 291px) 100vw, 291px" /><figcaption><em>WH Rocker Pivot and Safety levers. Note the purple color, a general roughness and cast lines &#8211; all typical of WH parts.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Sear, Sear lever and Trip</strong>: These are commonly found WH parts and can be a source of many functioning problems. Most have a purplish hue. These WH parts should be replaced with original GI parts.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/013-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19759" width="563" height="205" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/013-6.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/013-6-300x109.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/013-6-600x218.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px" /><figcaption><em>WH Sear and Trip. Note the purple color, especially with the trip and cast lines on both parts. No manufacturer markings are present.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/017-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19762" width="563" height="99" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/017-2.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/017-2-300x53.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/017-2-600x106.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 563px) 100vw, 563px" /><figcaption><em>WH Sear Lever. It fits inside the Sear.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Vertical fore grip &amp; pistol grip</strong>: While WH wood is not known for its beauty, it is very serviceable and only replaced for cosmetic reasons &#8211; or if a change in the grip mount dictates a different size fore grip. Butt stocks and horizontal fore grips are normally new or refinished GI production. Vertical fore grips are AOC production and known for their flat or slab sides. The pistol grips can either be new or refinished GI or AOC slab side production. When the 3/4 inch grip mount was introduced, the GI horizontal fore grips were re-inletted for the wider part. There is a great deal of variation in the wood found on WH Thompson’s during the 11 year production run.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/016-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-19763" width="375" height="321" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/016-6.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/016-6-300x256.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/016-6-600x513.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /><figcaption><em>A typical West Hurley flat or slab sided fore-grip.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Epilogue</strong></p>



<p>When compared to a Thompson manufactured to original ordnance or GI specifications, most everything about the WH Thompson can be problematic. However, they do run with some work and replacement of most of the WH parts. When WH Thompsons were in production, the vast quantities of original Thompson parts kits as found on the market today were not available.</p>



<p>Mr. Trast said if complete Thompson parts kits had been readily available from 1975 to 1986, it is quite likely AOC would have only manufactured the receiver and vertical fore grip. West Hurley’s are generally an entry level Thompson because of the lower price. Is it possible to take a WH Thompson and have it completely overhauled, refurbished and brought into proper specifications? Yes. And the end product will run perfectly and look just about as good as anything that came out of Hartford, Connecticut in the early 1920s.</p>



<p class="has-light-green-cyan-background-color has-background">(<em>Author’s note: The story of West Hurley Thompson parts is a work in progress. This is the first attempt at trying to catalog all the different Thompson submachine gun parts manufactured and used by AOC in West Hurley, New York. The author encourages anyone who has seen, owns or knows about any different parts or part variations to contact him via Small Arms Review. Additional information may be compiled into an updated story in the future in an effort to make all of us more knowledgeable with the West Hurley Thompsons. This story would not have been possible without the support of all the great members of <a href="www.MachineGunBoards.com">www.MachineGunBoards.com</a>, many of whom are WH owners that replaced most of the parts you see pictured in this story.</em>)</p>



<p></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V15N2 (November 2011)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALL THOMPSON SHOW &#038; SHOOT</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/all-thompson-show-shoot-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Event Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V14N4 (Jan 2011)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Helen Iams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauren Pajot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert G. Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Thompson Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Veronesi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V14N4]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=16301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Show The 19th annual All Thompson Show and Shoot, in association with The American Thompson Association (TATA), held their event on August 13-14, 2010. 110 members and friends of TATA registered for the event traveling from such diverse places as Wisconsin, Illinois, Virginia, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah and Kentucky to attend [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="544" height="750" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-44.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16303" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-44.jpg 544w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-44-218x300.jpg 218w" sizes="(max-width: 544px) 100vw, 544px" /><figcaption><em>A collage of several events that make up the All Thompson Show and Shoot. To the top is the welcoming sign at the Thompson Collectors Conference Center. Far left is experienced Thompson shooter Lauren Pajot showing excellent form during the paper target event. On the lower right is David Albert as he gave a clear and concise PowerPoint presentation on reproduction Thompson items. To the center right illustrates various models of Thompsons on display from one collector.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Show</strong></p>



<p>The 19th annual All Thompson Show and Shoot, in association with The American Thompson Association (TATA), held their event on August 13-14, 2010. 110 members and friends of TATA registered for the event traveling from such diverse places as Wisconsin, Illinois, Virginia, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah and Kentucky to attend the event in Granville, Ohio to display, talk and shoot Thompsons.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="731" height="750" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-42.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16305" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-42.jpg 731w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-42-292x300.jpg 292w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-42-600x616.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 731px) 100vw, 731px" /><figcaption><em>Tom Davis examines a canvas Thompson spare parts pouch for authenticity.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>On Friday the 13th, the show began at the Thompson Collectors Conference Center, hosted by world renowned collector and author Tracie Hill and his family, with 55 tables of Thompsons and related equipment on display. With the doors opening at 10 a.m., Friday is devoted to a show and tell display of the registrant&#8217;s guns and accessories reverently exhibited on display tables throughout the conference center. All makes and models of Thompsons were present as were a wide assortment of accessories, spare parts, stick and drum magazines, web gear, manuals and historical documents &#8211; many of which were for sale. The array of Thompsons and the devotion to the subject is phenomenal.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="253" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-41.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16306" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-41.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-41-300x101.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-41-600x202.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>Cleverly cutting away other sections around the Thompson is about all you can do with a demilled Thompson receiver, but it then makes for an interesting presentation.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>At 1 p.m., approximately 60 attendees filed into the library to attend a PowerPoint presentation by David Albert on reproduction Thompson items. Becoming a real concern with collectors, the unmarked reproduction of Thompson gear and accessories was discussed beginning with the various motives involved: sometimes for profit, sometimes to reproduce an exceptionally rare item for representation in a collection or for use with re-enactors and sometimes to specifically fool the purchaser. Reproduction of items is not a bad thing as long as it is marked in such a way that purchasers know that it is a reproduction. Of great concern is unmarked items that are sold as original to collectors and if used in the field by re-enactors or shooters, over a period of time, the new item gets wear and tear and a patina that makes it look like an original item. The PowerPoint presentation showed many examples of original gear with proper markings and reproduction gear with counterfeit markings. This applies to all manner of web gear, accessories and manuals.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="269" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-43.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16308" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-43.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-43-300x108.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-43-600x215.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>Collectors proudly displayed their Thompsons for all to see.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>To their credit, the Board of Directors of The American Thompson Association has adopted a new bylaw for their association regarding Reproduction Marking Standards. The American Thompson Association is a group of collectors dedicated to preserving the history, collecting, and promoting the safe operation of legal Thompson submachine guns. The club has a responsibility to future collectors and recognizes that many artifacts and accessories associated with the Thompson are being reproduced, or have been reproduced in the past. As a result, TATA assumes a stewardship role for future collectors, who, upon encountering reproduction items now and in the future, may not be able to reasonably determine their originality. This can have the effect of reducing collector value of original specimens, as well as present unintended (or intended) ethical issues among the Thompson collector community.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="360" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-36.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16309" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-36.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-36-300x144.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-36-600x288.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>Different editions of the Thompson manual as put out by Auto-Ordnance Corporation were on display at the show.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The American Thompson Association adopted a standard consisting of marking any new Thompson submachine gun reproduction items with a name or other distinguishable identifying mark that indicates the manufacturing entity, and at least the year of manufacture. The marking should be easily visible, and made in a manner that the item can be readily identifiable as a reproduction, such as die stamping in metal, firmly stamped wood markings, readily accessible publisher marks inside the front page of a paper item, permanently painted markings on canvas material, or other reasonable and permanent marking methods. (An example for stock markings is to mark such items under the buttplate, and on top of the grip, as these are already standard methods, and will not detract cosmetically from their presentation on a Thompson.)</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="655" height="750" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-34.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16310" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-34.jpg 655w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-34-262x300.jpg 262w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-34-600x687.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 655px) 100vw, 655px" /><figcaption><em>First time Thompson shooter Dr. Helen Iams quickly gets into the swing of things.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>TATA members must comply with the standard, and any reproduction item made by a member after notification of the adoption of the new standard in the club newsletter should be marked according to the TATA reproduction marking standard.</p>



<p>A list consisting of 3 categories of Thompson reproduction items will be maintained:</p>



<p>* New reproduction Thompson items that conform to TATA marking standard, to include known manufacturer information.</p>



<p>* Existing reproduction items that conform to TATA marking standard, to include known manufacturer information.</p>



<p>* Reproduction Thompson items that do not conform to TATA marking standard, to include known manufacturer information.</p>



<p>At a later time to be determined, once greater experience has been gained with managing a marking standard, TATA will present their standard to the NRA as a potential best practice. The standard may also be introduced to other NRA affiliated collector organizations who might want to adopt a similar standard.</p>



<p><strong>The Shoot</strong></p>



<p>Saturday the 14th was devoted to shooting Thompsons at a beautiful nearby range in Newark. There were two structured events and then free range shooting time after that. Thompsons used in the competitions must be in original factory configuration.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="229" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-23.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16312" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-23.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-23-300x92.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-23-600x183.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>Shooters test their skill during the metal knock-down pepper-popper event.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The morning event had 43 shooters registered and began at 7:30 a.m. Five shooters at a time would shoot with each shooter having a range officer supervising his or her actions.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="534" height="750" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-20.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16313" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-20.jpg 534w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-20-214x300.jpg 214w" sizes="(max-width: 534px) 100vw, 534px" /><figcaption><em>Winners of the hotly contested metal knock-down event were runner-up Tony Veronesi (left) and winner Dan Block (right).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Stage 1. From a distance of 50 yards, shooters will load one magazine with 20 rounds and have a time limit of 25 seconds to fire 20 rounds on one target using semiautomatic fire only.</li><li>Stage 2. From a distance of 25 yards, shooters will load one magazine with 20 rounds and have a time limit of 25 seconds to fire 20 rounds on three targets using automatic burst fire.</li><li>Stage 3. From a distance of 25 yards, shooters will load one magazine with 20 rounds and have a time limit of 20 seconds to fire 20 rounds on three targets using automatic burst fire.</li><li>Stage 4. From a distance of 10 yards (30 feet), shooters will load one magazine with 20 rounds and have a time limit of 15 seconds to fire 20 rounds on three targets using automatic burst fire.</li><li>Stage 5. From a distance of 7 yards (21 feet), shooters will load one magazine with 20 rounds and have a time limit of 4 seconds to fire 20 rounds on three targets using automatic burst fire.</li></ul>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="398" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16314" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-19.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-19-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-19-600x318.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>The firing line during the stage 5, 4-second, 7-yard paper target event.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Total rounds fired is 100 rounds. Less time is allotted to the shooter the closer they got to the target requiring speed as well as accuracy. Each target had to be engaged separately and sweeping the three targets in one long burst was not allowed.</p>



<p>Targets used were the standard OPOTA combat silhouette type. Hits inside and cutting the outer silhouette line counted as hits. The shooter with the most hits was the winner. Hits in the INZ (Instant Neutralization Zone &#8211; a T shaped area covering the brain and spinal column down to the middle of the chest) were recorded for use in the event of a tie.</p>



<p>Immediately following the first competition, the second competition took place consisting of metal &#8220;pepper-popper&#8221; knock-down targets. 32 shooters registered for this event. Two shooters would compete against each other in a two-out-of three engagement. A shooter had to knock down his six metal targets before the other shooter knocked down his six targets. The last, center targets, were set at a slight angle so that one would fall over the other in a closely contested event. After all the initial pairing of shooters took place, the winner of each heat then competed against the winner of another heat. This elimination process continued until there were only two shooters left to determine first and second place.</p>



<p>Free range shooting time was available on the main range during the metal target events located on a side range.</p>



<p>All shooting ended at 3 p.m. and everyone went back to their hotel to shower and freshen up for the buffet banquet dinner that was held back at the Thompson Collectors Conference Center at 5:30.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="750" height="460" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-15.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16315" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-15.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-15-300x184.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-15-600x368.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /><figcaption><em>A family affair, Robert Segel and daughter Lauren Pajot enjoy quality time together at the All Thompson Show and Shoot.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>A delicious buffet dinner of tenderloin, chicken breasts and all the sides and trimmings were served along with a dessert selection that would please any taste. Normally held outside, due to inclement weather, the dinner was moved indoors. The winners of the day&#8217;s contests were announced after dinner. The morning shoot winners were: 1st place to Charlie LeCount with a perfect score of 100 (with 7 hits in the INZ) and 2nd place went to Tom James with a 95 (with 8 shots in the INZ). The winner of the metal target knock-down pepper-popper event was Dan Block with Tony Veronesi coming in second in a very closely contested and exciting event.</p>



<p>The camaraderie and gathering of like-minded people in a casual setting such as this two-day event is a testament to the diversity of interests that people are more than willing to share. The 20th annual All Thompson Show &amp; Shoot will be held in August, 2011. Check the The American Thompson Association website for the dates and details.</p>



<p><strong><u>The American Thompson Association</u></strong><br>P.O. Box 8710<br>Newark, OH 43508-8710<br>Website: <a href="http://www.nfatoys.com/tsmg/tata/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.nfatoys.com/tsmg/tata</a></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V14N4 (January 2011)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE THIRD SAVAGE THOMPSON</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-third-savage-thompson/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N12 (Sep 2009)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Firearms Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numrich Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N12]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=15564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Savage started production at serial number S-15041, then S-15043 would be the third Savage Thompson manufactured. Could Mike have purchased the third Savage Thompson? And as a shooter! The Auto-Ordnance Corporation spent nearly twenty years trying to market the first production run of 15,000 Thompson submachine guns. Unfortunately, no one customer wanted enough of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>If Savage started production at serial number S-15041, then S-15043 would be the third Savage Thompson manufactured. Could Mike have purchased the third Savage Thompson? And as a shooter!</em></p>



<p>The Auto-Ordnance Corporation spent nearly twenty years trying to market the first production run of 15,000 Thompson submachine guns. Unfortunately, no one customer wanted enough of this new type of weapon at any one time to deplete the inventory. In 1939, two very important events transpired: the rumblings of another world war began in Europe and a new management team took over an almost failed Auto-Ordnance Corporation. The new president, J. Russell Maguire, had a fresh vision for Auto-Ordnance and the foresight to place the Thompson back in production &#8211; even before the old inventory of Thompson guns manufactured years ago by Colt’s Patent Firearms Manufacturing Company were sold. A deal was struck in December 1939 wherein the Savage Arms Company, Utica, New York, became the second subcontractor to manufacture the Thompson. The first Savage manufactured Thompsons rolled off the assembly line four months later for delivery to many new Auto-Ordnance customers.</p>



<p>When long time Thompson enthusiast Mike Wank first examined Savage Thompson submachine gun S-15043, he knew immediately the serial number was almost too good to be true. Serial number S-15043 was recorded on the ATF registration Form 4 and the numbers on the upper receiver and lower frame matched. Mike recognized something was probably amiss with this serial number; however, he purchased S-15043 because he found exactly what he wanted &#8211; a Tommy Gun at a good price.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="298" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-95.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15566" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-95.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-95-300x128.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-95-600x255.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The serial number on the lower frame of S-15043 appears to be original.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>No documentation has been uncovered that tells exactly what serial number Savage Arms used when Thompson production began. It is believed by many Thompson experts the serial numbering started exactly where the Colt manufactured Thompson’s stopped: No. 15041. To support this belief are documented Savage Model of 1928 Thompsons in the 15,000, 16,000 and 17,000 serial number ranges. The earliest production Savage Thompson known to exist is S-15651. Actually, it is the only Savage Thompson found by this author to exist in the 15,000 serial number range. As were many of the early Savage Thompsons, S-15651 was apparently sold to the British Purchasing Commission as evidenced by the British Broad Arrow markings on the left side of the receiver by the magazine well. The extreme need for guns by the British in early World War II may well explain why there are so few surviving examples of early Savage Thompsons. It is very likely many of these early guns were probably used until they could be used no more and discarded or simply just lost in battle.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="241" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-105.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15567" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-105.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-105-300x103.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-105-600x207.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Right side receiver markings of Savage Thompson No. S-15043. Note the Bridgeport, Connecticut, U.S.A. address and patent number markings. This is a late Savage production receiver.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>If Savage started production at serial number S-15041, then S-15043 would be the third Savage Thompson manufactured. Could Mike have purchased the third Savage Thompson? And as a shooter!</p>



<p>Early production Savage Thompsons have a few characteristics that are quite different from the later production Savage Thompsons. The most common known difference is the New York, N.Y. U.S.A. address on the right side of the receiver. The great majority of Savage Thompsons have a Bridgeport, Connecticut U.S.A. address. Many Thompson enthusiasts have never seen a Savage Thompson with a New York address. The exact point where the address markings changed is unknown. Frank Iannamico’s excellent Thompson reference book,&nbsp;<em>American Thunder II</em>, places the address change somewhere between the 75,000 and 84,000 serial number ranges.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="266" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-105.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15569" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-105.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-105-300x114.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-105-600x228.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Right side receiver markings of Savage Thompson No. S-15043. Note the Bridgeport, Connecticut, U.S.A. address and patent number markings. This is a late Savage production receiver.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The second characteristic of early Savage production Thompsons is not so well known; it involves the patent markings on the right side of the receiver. Early Savage Thompsons have patent date markings that are identical to the markings on the late serial numbered Colt Thompsons. These are the patent date markings with the 1922 dates (identical to Colt Thompsons from serial No. 14500 to the end of the Colt production at No. 15040). The patent markings commonly found on the great majority of all Thompsons, including Savage Thompsons with a New York address, are patent numbers. As with the different addresses, above, it is also unknown at what point the patent date markings changed to the patent number markings. Research by the author has documented Savage Thompsons in the 25,000 and lower serial number ranges with the patent date markings; and documented Savage Thompsons in the 26,000 and higher serial number ranges with the patent number markings. Somewhere in between this range of serial numbers appears to be the change-over point &#8211; approximately 10,000 guns into production. However, this research was somewhat limited in scope because there are not a lot of very early Savage Thompsons to examine. As with all war time manufactured firearms, exceptions undoubtedly exist and will surface as research continues.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="282" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-94.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15571" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-94.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-94-300x121.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-94-600x242.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The left side receiver markings of Savage Thompson No. S-16863. This very desirable “Savage Commercial” Thompson is owned by SAR enthusiast Bob Devenney.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>It is important to re-emphasize Savage receivers were still being marked with a New York address when the patent date markings changed to patent number markings. There are three known variations of address and patent markings on the Savage Thompson receiver:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>The very early first type Savage receiver marked with a New York address and patent date markings (seldom encountered).</li><li>The second type Savage receiver marked with a New York address and patent number markings is the most commonly found Savage receiver with a New York address. The patent numbers were positioned in the same location as the patent dates.</li><li>The third type (and most commonly encored) Savage receiver is marked with a Bridgeport address and patent number markings.</li></ul>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="352" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-81.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-15572" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-81.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-81-300x151.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-81-600x302.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The right side receiver markings of Savage Thompson, No. S-16863. Note the New York address and patent date markings (with the late 1922 patent dates). This is an early Savage production receiver. The name of the police department (MPD) that formerly owned this Thompson is currently unknown.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>A quick inspection of Mike’s Thompson revealed a Bridgeport, Connecticut address and patent number markings and is definitely a late production Savage receiver. Careful examination of the serial number area revealed some handy work by an enterprising person or company.</p>



<p>The matching serial number on the lower frame of S-15043 looks to be original. There is a very slight misalignment of the numbers, but this is common on Savage lower frames. Most important, all the numbers on the lower frame are machine stamped and appear unchanged and unaltered.</p>



<p>Mike filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on S-15043 to learn more about the history of this Savage Thompson with the unusual serial number. From the redacted documents provided by ATF, it can be determined S-15043 began life on the National Firearms Act (NFA) Registry via an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 2 (Return of Firearms Manufactured, Imported, or Received by Manufacturer, Importer, Dealer (Other Than Pawnbroker), and Pawnbroker, under Chapter 25, Subchapter B, Internal Revenue Code), dated December 1, 1951. This registration date explained the reason for the handy work on the receiver and also told the exact origin of this Thompson. December 1, 1951, is believed to be the date George Numrich of The Numrich Arms Company (NAC) registered approximately 95 class three weapons that were included in the Thompson assets purchased from Frederic A. Willis and three of his associates on October 23, 1951. The class three weapons involved in this sale included Thompson submachine guns, prototype Thompson guns, Birmingham Small Arms (BSA) submachine guns, a .30-06 machine gun and a sufficient quantity of parts to assemble complete Thompsons. The small number of Thompsons registered by Numrich Arms Company in 1951 has come to be known by many in the Thompson community as the “NAC” or the “crate” Thompsons &#8211; because the complete Thompson business was packed away in crates when purchased by George Numrich. Continuing research has revealed several other NAC Thompsons also began life on the NFA Registry on December 1, 1951, with a documented transfer from former Thompson owner Frederic A. Willis to Numrich Arms Company.</p>



<p>Fortunately, the buttstock of S-15043 retained a property tag of one of the previous owners, The Village of Liberty. Internet research revealed such a city in the State of New York, very close to Mamaroneck, New York, the location of the Numrich Arms Company in 1951. Review of the FOIA redacted IRS/ATF forms indicated S-15043 had not been owned by a governmental agency for many years. A call to the police department located a retired officer who was for many years in charge of the Village of Liberty Police Department Firearm Training Division: Lt. Doug Lindsley.</p>



<p>Doug Lindsley began his career at the Village of Liberty Police Department in early 1971; he retired with the rank of Lieutenant in June 1995. Three times a year he attended the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) firearms training at Camp Smith, New York, and also assisted as a firearms instructor for the FBI special agents. In 1979, he was invited to attend the FBI’s annual qualification, barbecue, and competition shoot at Camp Smith. The shoot lasted three days and when the smoke cleared, Doug had finished first, ahead of the 186 FBI agents and 44 different state agency officers. Unfortunately, he could not accept the first place award because the competition was only for the agents&#8230; but he did manage a big smile for a long time afterward. The Thompson was used in many different phases of training at Camp Smith, but this only lasted for a couple of years. Doug recalled the Bureau began phasing out submachine gun training and started emphasizing the use of shotguns for the many small towns and rural areas in the State of New York. There are no known photographs of S-15043 while it was at the police department or any record of it ever being fired in the line of duty.</p>



<p>S-15043 was at the department when Doug became a police officer. A 50-round drum and two 20-round magazines accompanied the gun. Some excellent detective work by Doug produced a copy of the original IRS Form 5 (Firearms) tax exempt transfer document. This form shows August 15, 1952, as the date of transfer for S-15043 between the Village of Liberty Police Department and Numrich Arms Company. It is signed by “George R. Numrich, Jr., Individual Owner, 505 Halstead Avenue, Mamaroneck, New York.”</p>



<p>Doug believed S-15043 was sold back to Numrich Arms in the early 1980s and the money used to purchase shotguns. He was half-right; obtaining shotguns for the Liberty Police Department was the reason S-15043 was sold. But the purchasing dealer was Selective Fire Limited, a well known Class Three dealer now located in Marietta, Georgia.</p>



<p>The police patch shown in this story was the official department patch when S-15043 was in service with the Village of Liberty Police Department. Doug believed this patch should always be with S-15043 and proudly provided it to Mike.</p>



<p>Is Mike’s Thompson the third production Thompson submachine gun manufactured by Savage Arms Company in 1940? Yes and no. The receiver was definitely not produced in the early months of 1940. It is a late production Savage receiver that was probably surplus or rejected for some unknown reason and then never needed because production changed in 1942 from the Model of 1928 Thompson to the Model M1 Thompson. However, the lower frame appears to be original and at one time part of the original Savage S-15043 Thompson. Interviews of several former owners indicated S-15043 may have been parkerized after it was sold by the Village of Liberty Police Department. It is not hard to imagine how the original third Thompson manufactured by Savage could have been used in early quality control type testing that ultimately may have led to the receiver being destroyed or discarded. There is no doubt the lower frame of S-15043 was retained by Savage Arms (and later by Auto-Ordnance Bridgeport) and ultimately made its way to the Numrich Arms Company when George Numrich purchased the Thompson in 1951.</p>



<p>Review of other known “NAC” Thompsons with Savage receivers show the same serial numbering handy work as S-15043. The reversed numeral three in the serial number is just another example of the rudimentary Numrich Arms Company early markings. Careful examination of the receiver revealed what may have been a “NAC” or “NU” (for Numrich?) marking below the Numrich Arms Company stamped serial number; this marking was probably removed when this Thompson was refinished. Numrich Arms Company had to mark the serial numbers on the Thompson receivers in 1951 before registration with the Internal Revenue Service or the government would assign a serial number. The lower frame of S-15043 was obviously found in among the many Thompson parts and mated with a Savage receiver. A decision to mark this Thompson with the serial number of the lower frame was made and a new “NAC Thompson” was born. What happened to the “first” Savage S-15043 will probably never be known; however, the lower frame of this third Savage Thompson continues to live on as part of this “NAC” or “crate” Thompson.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V12N12 (September 2009)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE KILGORE MFG. COMPANY, WESTERVILLE OHIO</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-kilgore-mfg-company-westerville-ohio/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V11N12 (Sep 2008)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Ordnance Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederic A. Willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maguire Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gun That Made the Twenties Roar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Kilgore Manufacturing Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson Automatic Arms Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V11N12]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=13550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Tom Davis, Jr. “The Gun That Made the Twenties Roar” Many stories involving the Thompson have been written over the years. The first near complete historical publication was The Gun That Made The Twenties Roar by William J. Helmer, first published in 1969. Prior to this publication, most stories on the Thompson were only [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Tom Davis, Jr.</em></p>



<p><em><strong>“The Gun That Made the Twenties Roar”</strong></em></p>



<p>Many stories involving the Thompson have been written over the years. The first near complete historical publication was The Gun That Made The Twenties Roar by William J. Helmer, first published in 1969. Prior to this publication, most stories on the Thompson were only a rehash of old news and magazine articles &#8211; some accurate, some not. Mr. Helmer’s attention to detail from the beginnings of General Thompson’s dream in the early 1900s until the end of World War II is exceptional. However, instead of continuing his scholarly efforts, he chose to end the story with a brief summation about what happened after Maguire Industries, Inc. sold off the Thompson submachine gun.</p>



<p>In a few short paragraphs, Mr. Helmer told of a corporate re-organization where the once famous Auto-Ordnance Corporation was renamed as a division of Maguire Industries, Inc. and how later, the Thompson was transferred from Maguire Industries to Kilgore Manufacturing Company, then to Frederic A. Willis and finally to Numrich Arms Comapny.</p>



<p>According to Mr. Helmer’s footnotes, much of this information was provided by George Numrich, the last party in this series of transactions. Of course, it was all new information at the time so everyone was pleased just to learn how the Thompson actually made the move from Maguire to Numrich.</p>



<p>Until now, this is all that has been recorded about the Thompson during the last years at Maguire Industries. In 1945, the Thompson submachine gun at Maguire Industries was packed away in crates and lay dormant in a warehouse taking up space until an unexpected offer to purchase the Thompson in 1949 came from the Kilgore Manufacturing Company of Westerville, Ohio. Kilgore reportedly had no interest in the Thompson, but apparently thought a market existed for the Thompson in Egypt. Kilgore reportedly paid Maguire $385,000. The Kilgore deal with the Egyptians never materialized and Kilgore later sold off the Thompson without ever opening the crates.</p>



<p><strong>Maguire Industries</strong></p>



<p>Why Maguire Industries sold the Thompson can be resolved in one word: money. Russell Maguire was a very capable businessman who saw a great opportunity with the nearly defunct and broke Auto-Ordnance Corporation; a business entity that had been going nowhere for many years. With Maguire’s money, talent and hand picked management team, he turned this soon to be liquidated business into a great and profitable manufacturing empire. Maguire also had the foresight to look past the end of World War II and realize the Tommy Gun business was going to end. After all, under his watch, the Auto-Ordnance Corporation was responsible for the manufacture of over 1,750,000 Thompsons &#8211; all the world would need for many years to come. Actual production of the Thompson ended in February 1944. Maguire wisely packed away the Tommy Gun at the end of the war and diversified his business enterprise for the years ahead.</p>



<p>Unfortunately, the years after World War II were not very kind to Maguire Industries. Part of the reason may have been the loss of his Executive VP and Chief Operating Officer, Eugene Powers, who left Maguire Industries in June 1945. Powers had been with Maguire since the beginning of the Thompson venture; he was actively involved in the negotiations to purchase the Auto-Ordnance Corporation and the creation of the Thompson Automatic Arms Company. By 1949, Maguire Industries was having serious monetary losses. Powers came back to Maguire Industries in 1950, shortly after the sale of the Thompson, and returned the corporation to profitability.</p>



<p><strong>Frederic A. Willis</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="485" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-38.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13551" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-38.jpg 485w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-38-208x300.jpg 208w" sizes="(max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px" /><figcaption><em>A national periodical in 1940 described Willis as the “straight-lipped” and “youthful” Vice-President of the Thompson Automatic Arms Corporation.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The president of Kilgore in 1949 was Henry Watkins. In a short letter to Mr. Helmer in 1964, Mr. Watkins disclosed how Kilgore Manufacturing was introduced to the deal that led to the purchase of the Thompson from Maguire Industries by a man named Frederic Willis, a former Vice-President of the Auto-Ordnance Corporation. Specific details of the actual deal brokered by Willis involving the sale of the Thompson between Maguire Industries and Kilgore Manufacturing are unknown.</p>



<p>The revelation that Frederic Willis actually brought the Thompson deal to Kilgore is very revealing. Willis was hired as a Vice-President of the Thompson Automatic Arms Corporation (TAAC) and its subsidiary, the Auto-Ordnance Corporation (AOC), by Russell Maguire in June 1940. Willis was a former Army officer and a veteran of the Mexican border service and the First World War. His first assignment was the arms expansion program at TAAC/AOC. Willis was quoted in a 1940&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;article as saying, “With current methods of warfare, the submachine gun is to modern military units what the blitzkrieg is to modern military tactics. It steps up tremendously the firepower of the individual soldier or unit.”</p>



<p>It appears Russell Maguire sought out one or more of his former executives in an attempt to sell the Thompson business. The bond between Maguire and Willis must have been very strong. During his tenure with Maguire Industries, Willis authored a book on the Thompson submachine gun, privately printed at least one copy, and presented it to Russell Maguire.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="533" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-56.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13552" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-56.jpg 533w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-56-228x300.jpg 228w" sizes="(max-width: 533px) 100vw, 533px" /><figcaption><em>The title page of the book Willis presented to Russell Maguire. Note the picture of the Auto-Ordnance Model T2 submachine gun that was to become the successor to the M1A1 Thompson. (Courtesy of Cary Maguire)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>With Kilgore looking to expand its business line and Willis looking for a buyer of a product no longer needed by Maguire Industries, a deal was struck. Eugene Powers was not involved in the 1949 deal between Maguire and Kilgore, but he related to Mr. Helmer in a letter dated May 1, 1964, that, “The drawings, blueprints, dies and other assets strictly related to the submachine gun were sold, I believe, to Kilgore.”</p>



<p>George Numrich reported to Mr. Helmer that he had heard the deal between Maguire Industries and Kilgore “was transacted from start to finish in less than 48 hours.” Obviously, this could have only happened if Russell Maguire was directly involved in the sale.</p>



<p><strong>The Kilgore Manufacturing Company</strong></p>



<p>The Kilgore Manufacturing Company was started in 1912 by Joseph D. Kilgore in Homestead, Pennsylvania to manufacture small cast iron cap pistols and mechanical toys. In 1918, Kilgore moved its operation to Westerville, Ohio. At one time, Kilgore was the largest toy cap pistol maker in the United States. Kilgore expanded its product line in 1929 with the establishment of the International Flare-Signal Division in Tippecanoe City, Ohio. During World War II, Kilgore became very active in the manufacturing of munitions and pyrotechnic devices. The Westerville plant had a north and south side that was separated by a main highway. The north plant was engaged in the manufacture of toy guns and caps. The south plant was used to manufacture items for government sales, mainly pyrotechnic devices. Interviews of several former Kilgore employees disclosed that after World War II, Kilgore was searching for ways to supplement the toy line and expand its business operation.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="500" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-54.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13553" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-54.jpg 500w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-54-214x300.jpg 214w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></figure></div>



<p>The 1964 letter by Kilgore President Henry Watkins also told how Kilgore Manufacturing Company purchased “the tools for the Thompson submachine gun” from Maguire Industries. Watkins stated Kilgore made the purchase intending to sell the tools to manufacture the Thompson to a foreign country. Watkins did not reveal the foreign country or the reason the deal did not occur, but did state Kilgore “never actually manufactured any (new) submachine guns.” However, Kilgore did acquire in the sale, or assembled from parts after the sale, some complete Thompsons. Watkins told how Kilgore had “a license issued by a Federal agency” and actually sold “about a half dozen guns” before getting out of the machine gun business.</p>



<p>According to George Numrich, who later purchased the Thompson from Frederic Wallis, Kilgore reportedly paid Maguire Industries $385,000 for all rights and interest to the Thompson submachine gun. As this story unfolds, it will become quite apparent that Willis would have been a very informed party regarding each sale of the Thompson since it left Maguire Industries.</p>



<p>The Thompson at Kilgore Manufacturing was described by retired Kilgore VP Robert Long as a “hush hush venture” that was run out of the front office. According to Long, the rank and file employees at Kilgore knew nothing or very little about this project. Mr. Long had very little contact with the “machine gun outfit” at Kilgore; however, he does recall seeing a machine gun at the plant one day that had a drum attached underneath it in a building on the south side of the plant. The building was broken up into various rooms and the machine gun stuff was located in one of the rooms. Mr. Long remembered the building was not in use before the Thompson parts were moved into it; he also recalled the building was last used to make chemical igniters for flamethrowers.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="49" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-49.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13555" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-49.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-49-300x21.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-49-600x42.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The marketing slogan for the Kilgore Manufacturing Company M1A1 Thompson submachine gun is certainly unique &#8211; and complete with the world famous Thompson bullet logo</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Was Kilgore only purchasing the tools to manufacture the Thompson with the plan to sell these assets off to a foreign government? The search for answers involved many interviews with every former and retired Kilgore employee that could be located. Unfortunately, due to the passage of time, many have passed away. However, one employee knew exactly what the author was taking about when the interview topic referenced the Thompson. Interestingly, this employee, Bob Tillman, was never at the Kilgore plant in Westerville, but was hired by Kilgore after the Kilgore operation left Westerville, Ohio in 1961 and moved to Tennessee. While searching for something in an old file cabinet that had been moved down to Tennessee from the Westerville plant, Bob noticed an unusual sales brochure with a picture of a gun and the Kilgore logo. It was definitely not a cap gun, and not something Bob had ever seen associated with Kilgore. This brochure was rescued and set aside; shortly thereafter, the file cabinet and all remaining contents were discarded. The brochure tells a story by itself and also reveals another business venture contemplated by Kilgore management officials who purchased the Thompson. The brochure’s striking resemblance to older Thompson catalogs is uncanny. Without doubt, someone at Kilgore used an original Auto-Ordnance catalog as a guide for the design of the Kilgore Thompson sales brochure.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="539" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-45.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13554" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-45.jpg 539w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-45-231x300.jpg 231w" sizes="(max-width: 539px) 100vw, 539px" /><figcaption><em>The bottom right hand corner of the catalog reads, “Manufacturers of Munitions for Military Establishments, Thompson Submachine Guns and Signals and Flares.” Kilgore had definitely found a new product line to manufacture and market in the US. (Bob Tillman collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In 30 short years the Thompson motto had gone from General Thompson’s, “On the Side of Law and Order” to Kilgore’s, “Fire Power Is Peace Power” &#8211; an uncanny similarity in message. Kilgore apparently liked the use of slogans or motto’s for the products it produced. The motto for the well known Kilgore safety flare was, “Light your way for safety.”</p>



<p>Page 4 of the brochure referenced how Kilgore is a manufacturer of the Thompson submachine gun. It also advertises that spare parts “are available for immediate delivery” for all models of the Thompson. This is the only Kilgore brochure on the Thompson that has been located to date &#8211; and the only Thompson brochure found in the aforementioned file cabinet.</p>



<p><strong>The H.P. White Laboratory</strong></p>



<p>Careful reading of Mr. Helmer’s treatise on the Thompson did reveal a small clue about the happenings at Kilgore involving the Thompson. Hidden away in the footnote section is reference to an event that indicates the officials at Kilgore did not just purchase the Thompson to store or sell parts.</p>



<p>It appears someone at Kilgore opened some of the crated parts and found at least two Model 1923 Autorifles that were submitted to H.P. White Laboratory, Bel Air, Maryland, for testing purposes in 1949. Inquires at H.P. White revealed that Kilgore was a customer of H.P. White Laboratory in 1949. Not only did Kilgore submit the Model 1923 rifles for testing, Kilgore also hired H.P. White to design a firearms range. Additional reports were made by H.P. White for Kilgore on a “comparative evaluation of a 7.92&#215;57 prototype military rifle to the 7.62 Russian Tokarev rifle” along with reports on the Garand rifle, the Johnson rifle, and the MP43. The reports were dated July 13, August 5, August 10, and August 30 &#8211; all in 1949. The reports were addressed to: Dan Robinson, Ordnance Engineer, Kilgore Manufacturing Company, Westerville, Ohio</p>



<p>Interestingly, no report was located involving the Thompson Autorifles dated June 18, 1949. All efforts to obtain copies or review the remaining reports at H.P. White have been unsuccessful.</p>



<p><strong>The Thompson at Kilgore</strong></p>



<p>Numerous interviews of former Kilgore employees resulted in very little information concerning the Thompson at Kilgore. However, this all changed with the interview of former Kilgore employee John Ruyan. John started working for Kilgore in 1947 or 1948 as a chemist. He was later placed in charge of the south side of the Kilgore plant in Westerville. John recalled that Kilgore bought out a corporation that owned the Thompson and had the parts shipped to the Westerville plant. He does not know the exact reasoning behind why Kilgore decided to purchase the Thompson, but he believes the company was trying to expand its product line and thought the Thompson would fit right in with the other ordnance work it was doing. At the time, Kilgore made explosives and flares for the US Army &#8211; but John never did see the connection between the explosives, flares and machine guns.</p>



<p>John recounted the following story about the Thompson at Kilgore: “The crates containing the Thompson parts were locked in a building on the south side of the Kilgore plant. The north side of the plant, separated by East Broadway in Westerville, manufactured the cap guns, caps, toys and later, plastic items. The south side of the plant manufactured flares and munitions and was where the government business was conducted. The building that stored the Thompson parts had bars on the windows and doors installed before the Thompson parts arrived, and only one person, the project manager, had the key. While at Westerville, Kilgore Manufacturing was a very secure plant with fences and guards. The officials at Kilgore would not have taken a risk of losing any guns or parts. I was only in the building that contained the Thompson parts two or three times. I do not recall the exact year or years all of this occurred, but I believe the 1949 to 1951 time frame would be about right. I was in the building one time to take measurements to build a manufacturing or production line for the manufacture of flamethrower igniters. I am pretty sure the Thompson Project Manager was a man named Dan Robinson. Dan would have been in his 40s or 50s during that time. Whenever anyone at the plant needed access to that building, they had to go get Dan and he would accompany them to the building, open the door and stay with them until they left. I always assumed the government was somehow involved with this project the way the Project Manager guarded the parts. The crates were about 4 or 5 foot long, about 1 foot wide and 2 foot deep. The crates were full of gun parts and the parts were labeled. I would guess the number of crates I saw containing Thompson parts was somewhere around twenty, maybe less. The crates were stacked around the floor beside tables in what appeared to be the set-up for a production line to assemble the guns. I do remember a crate or two actually on the tables but most crates were on the floor beside the tables. I am fairly certain no individual parts were actually on the tables when I was in the building. I have set up many production lines over the years and it was obvious to me the intent of the layout I saw was to assemble guns. The set-up and parts I observed was in this building for approximately a year, maybe less, before being moved to make space for other government projects. I do not know what happened to the crates of Thompson parts.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="407" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-39.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13556" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-39.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-39-300x174.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-39-600x349.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Footnote No. 24, from The Gun that Made The Twenties Roar by William Helmer.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="195" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-32.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13558" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-32.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-32-300x84.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-32-600x167.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Note the difference in the Kilgore name in the above letterhead as compared to the letterhead shown at the beginning of this story, i.e., Manufacturing versus Incorporated. (Pearl Mae Eierman collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>When asked to tell what story he remembers most vividly about the Thompson at Kilgore, John replied, the Thompson parts “grew dust” &#8211; he does not know of any activity involving the Thompson parts at Kilgore. The building that housed the Thompson parts is still standing, as are many of the buildings from the old Kilgore Manufacturing plant. In the ensuing years, the building has been partitioned inside for several different small business endeavors. Two new additions have been added on to the building over the years &#8211; but the original building is still intact.</p>



<p>John was in the US Army during WWII and handled a Thompson with a side cocking knob. John thought the parts he saw were for a Thompson with a side cocking knob. He never saw a completed or assembled Thompson at the Kilgore plant.</p>



<p>All efforts to date to locate Dan Robinson or his family have been unsuccessful. Only a few of the former or retired Kilgore employees interviewed actually remember Robinson by name. Retired Vice-President Long believes Robinson was the employee that landed the munitions deal with Pakistan for Kilgore. These are the same munitions that exploded at a port in South Amboy, New Jersey on May 19, 1950, killing 31 people and injuring approximately 400 others. Dan Robinson is cited by name in a June 30, 1950, United States Coast Guard “Report of Investigation of the explosion at South Amboy, New Jersey 19 May 1950.” Robinson is introduced as the “Works Manager of the Kilgore Company” where he describes to government officials the specifications of the anti-tank and anti-personnel mines manufactured at the Kilgore plant.</p>



<p>The explosion at South Amboy Harbor had a profound effect on Kilgore Manufacturing and certainly could have changed any future plans Kilgore had involving the Thompson submachine gun. The explosion resulted in many years of protracted litigation for Kilgore, Hercules Powder and several other companies. The explosion had a major impact on the operation of the plant. At the time of the explosion, Kilgore was owned by the Commercial Credit Company. The potential losses faced by Kilgore as a result of the explosion caused a complete reorganization of Kilgore. In order to stay in business and preserve future assets from potential legal judgments, the Commercial Credit Company sold all the assets of the Kilgore Manufacturing Company to a new company, named Kilgore, Incorporated. Commercial Credit retained the liquid assets of Kilgore Inc. in escrow account to protect against the lawsuits then pending. When the lawsuits were later settled, the Kilgore Manufacturing Company was dissolved into the parent corporation, Kilgore Incorporated.</p>



<p><strong>The Egyptian Thompson: Do They Exist?</strong></p>



<p>In 1963, Mr. Thomas B. Nelson reported in his reference book, The World’s Submachine Guns, the existence of a submachine gun referred to as an Experimental Egyptian Thompson. This .45 ACP submachine gun was reported to have the following markings stamped on top of the receiver: Auto-Ordnance Corp., Bridgeport, Connecticut, Reg. in U.S. Patent Office. The Egyptian Thompson was reportedly made in Egypt in the early 1950s and is “very crudely manufactured.” Mr. Helmer also noted the existence of this Egyptian Thompson in his footnotes and understood the possible significance or link between this Thompson, Egypt and the Kilgore Manufacturing Company. Mr. Helmer believed this Egyptian Thompson could have possibly come from parts of one of the prototype guns designed by Auto-Ordnance Engineer William Hammond in 1942. Hammond was the designer of the Auto-Ordnance Model T2, a submachine gun with a tubular receiver that was designed to one day replace the Thompson. In a letter to Mr. Helmer dated August 10, 1967, retired Auto-Ordnance employee George Goll stated that he did not know anything about an Egypt submachine gun and added that “these guns could not have (been) made from any parts left over from Hammond Gun since there were only two Hammond Guns made.” George Goll was not involved with the Thompson at Kilgore.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="221" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-28.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13557" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-28.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-28-300x95.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-28-600x189.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The “Egyptian” Thompson on display at the National Firearms Centre in England &#8211; right side. (Photo by John Cross)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The reported Auto-Ordnance receiver markings have led to much speculation over the years that this Egyptian Thompson was somehow involved in the reported deal between Kilgore and Egypt. The Egyptian Thompson is currently on display at the National Firearms Centre in England, previously known as the Ministry of Defense Pattern Room. Noted British firearms enthusiast and researcher John Cross agreed to examine this Egyptian Thompson and reported the following information: “This submachine gun is very crudely made. There are no markings or numbers of any sort on any part of the gun. The gun pictured in Mr. Nelson’s book is indeed the same gun as on display at the National Firearms Centre. There is no background information on this gun at the Centre. However, a careful study of the Register of Firearms at the Centre indicates the acquisition would have been in the 1956 timeframe, around the exact time of the Suez Campaign of 1956. (A joint British and French armed expeditionary campaign that returned the Suez Canal back to British and French control after it was Nationalized by the Egyptian government.) The buttstock appears to be sawed off from an Italian Carcano rifle and has a poorly fitted alloy No. 4 buttplate. The foresight is similar to the Thompson Model M1A1 but homemade, and the rear sight is taken from some old military rifle, possibly a Martini. There is no provision for semi-automatic fire. It contains only two Thompson parts, the magazine and barrel &#8211; which is screwed only hand tight into the receiver. The extractor and the front part of the reduced diameter of the bolt have been brazed on the rear section of the bolt and then badly case hardened in an open furnace. The firing pin is machined into the breech face of what could possibly be the front section of a M1A1 Thompson bolt. Interestingly, the main spring cap is the sawed off base of an EC 43 steel .45 caliber ACP casing. The main spring was either originally not long enough or had broken and had been brazed together. The bolt body consists of a rear section of several sections welded together. The pistol grip is a machined block with the grips made of several sections of 1.5mm steel welded together in the same style as a Lewis gun. Despite appearances, the magazine catch is not from a Thompson gun.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="420" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-24.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13559" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-24.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-24-300x180.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-24-309x186.jpg 309w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-24-600x360.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The left side of the lower frame of the “Egyptian Thompson.” (Photo by John Cross)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>John made the following comment in regard to test firing this weapon: “As I had not remembered to bring my suit of armour or safety glasses with 1 inch thick glass, no attempt was made to fire this weapon!”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="149" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-17.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13560" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-17.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-17-300x64.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-17-600x128.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The top of the disassembled receiver of the “Egyptian” Thompson. There are no Auto-Ordnance markings on the receiver. In fact, there are no markings of any kind on this weapon. (Photo by John Cross)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The mystery of the so called Egyptian Thompson was finally solved. With none of the reported Auto-Ordnance Corporation markings and obvious small workshop-like manufacturing techniques and parts, it can be positively stated this weapon is not related to the possible deal that Kilgore Manufacturing may have been negotiating with the Egyptian government in 1949 and/or 1950.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="161" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/011-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13561" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/011-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/011-12-300x69.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/011-12-600x138.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The “Egyptian” Thompson bolt. Note where the front section of the bolt, probably from an M1A1 Thompson, is brazed onto the rear section of the bolt. (Photo by John Cross)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Willis Syndicate</strong></p>



<p>Approximately 3 months after the South Amboy explosion, Frederic Willis and three associates purchased back from Kilgore the “tools” for manufacturing the Thompson. Approximately fourteen months later, Numrich purchased the Thompson assets from Willis and a group of investors Numrich referred to as the “syndicate.”</p>



<p>Currently, the identity of only one of Willis’ associates involved in the Thompson deal with Kilgore is known. This associate is Theodore Hayes, most often referred to as “Teddy” Hayes. What is not generally known is Teddy Hayes was hired by Russell Maguire in the spring of 1942 as a Vice President of the Auto-Ordnance Corporation in charge of sales to the War Department and U.S. allies. While with Auto-Ordnance and later Maguire Industries, Hayes was described in the&nbsp;<em>Washington DC Times Herald</em>&nbsp;as “a natural for the post he holds, and important portals throughout the nation’s capitol open to him without a knock.” Hayes’ office was not at the Bridgeport plant, but in the nation’s capitol. His address as Vice-President of Maguire Industries was 726 Jackson Place, diagonally located across the street from the White House.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="235" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/012-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13562" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/012-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/012-10-300x101.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/012-10-600x201.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A section of the 1973 Kilgore Catalog featuring two slightly different Special Agent Playsets. (Tim Goss collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>All efforts to locate members of Frederic Willis’ immediate family and identify the other two associates involved with Willis and Hayes have been unsuccessful. Very little information involving Mr. Willis has surfaced since he left Auto-Ordnance. Unfortunately, the man that brought the Thompson deal to Kilgore and later purchased and then sold the Thompson passed away in 1967.</p>



<p>It is interesting to note Frederic Willis is listed as the seller on several (maybe all) of the Thompson submachine guns and receivers acquired by George Numrich in 1951. The&nbsp;<em>Thompson Collectors News</em>&nbsp;lists Thompson submachine gun, serial number NAC 5, as being acquired by Numrich Arms Company from Fred Willis on December 1, 1951. In Gordon Herigstad’s excellent reference book,&nbsp;<em>Colt Thompson Serial Numbers</em>, Thompsons with serial numbers NAC 2 and NAC 15 are also listed as being transferred to Numrich from Fred Willis.</p>



<p><strong>The Numrich Arms Company</strong></p>



<p>It was very puzzling how the great majority of former and retired Kilgore employees knew absolutely nothing about the Kilgore Thompson. One would have thought the delivery of a huge quantity of machine gun parts to a small town in Ohio would have been a noteworthy event. Could the twenty crates of parts remembered by Kilgore manager John Ruyan be all the Thompson assets &#8211; and for $385,000?</p>



<p>The answer to the location of the Thompson assets packed away in crates and stored in a warehouse by Maguire Industries may have been answered in a Numrich Arms Company undated brochure published in what appears to be the mid 1950s. The introductory paragraph tells the reader that the brochure is a “little booklet showing a few scenes of our West Hurley, N.Y. plant.” It then states, “No pictures of our Bridgeport, Conn. or Long Beach, Calif. warehouses are included since mostly cased goods are kept there.”</p>



<p>In a 1964 letter to Mr. Helmer, George Numrich stated the Willis syndicate held the Thompson assets in a warehouse that they “never went near” prior to the sale of the Thompson to his company. While not completely definitive, it is certainly noteworthy that Numrich also stored cased goods at a Bridgeport, Connecticut warehouse; the home of the former Auto-Ordnance Corporation and location where the Thompson was packed away and stored in crates by Maguire Industries in 1945.</p>



<p><strong>An Internal Revenue Service Investigation</strong></p>



<p>An Internal Revenue Service investigation was started as a result of Numrich Arms Company registering with the IRS Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division (ATTD) approximately 95 guns. A 1967 letter from the Director of the ATTD to Mr. Helmer revealed this investigation documented the Kilgore Manufacturing Company purchased from Maguire Industries in early 1949, “the equipment and inventory to manufacture the Thompson Submachine Gun.” Included in these assets from Maguire were “a number of assembled submachine guns and sufficient parts to assemble others.” Kilgore later sold these assets to Frederic Willis and three of his associates on August 7, 1950. According to George Numrich, Kilgore “had not renewed their license” when they sold the Thompson “package” to Willis. The transfer of these submachine guns and parts from Kilgore to Willis resulted in a taxable event according to US laws and regulations relating to the transfer of machine guns &#8211; and the IRS wanted the tax that was due and owing. Representatives of Kilgore held several conferences with ATTD and the tax liability was “settled on a fair and equitable basis.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="313" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/013-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13563" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/013-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/013-6-300x134.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/013-6-600x268.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>This is a very rare “new in the box” Kilgore collectable; a Kilgore Tommy Gun still in the plastic blister pack and cardboard shadow box used by Kilgore for shipping. (Tim Goss collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The ATTD investigation also included the sale of the Thompson assets by Willis to the Numrich Arms Company on October 23, 1951. Willis was found not to be a qualified dealer or manufacturer under the National Firearms Act, hence the resulting assessment of transfer taxes against “Willis and his three associates” in what the ATTD termed a “business venture.” The investigation goes on to say that after a complete review of all the facts, the tax liability against Willis and his three associates was “compromised in an appropriate manner.” George Numrich later informed Mr. Helmer that he believed Kilgore paid $15,000 in taxes. Numrich also heard the Willis “syndicate” was trying to settle with the IRS for $300.</p>



<p>It is now very clear why Kilgore was assessed the transfer tax. Kilgore had definitely opened at least some of the crates, understood the need for federal licensing to manufacture and sell National Firearms Act weapons and sold at least a half dozen submachine guns. In addition, a quick review of the Kilgore brochure explains why the officials at Kilgore could not claim they did not contemplate a plan to manufacture and market the Thompson in the United States. Additional information on the Thompson guns sold by Kilgore or what happened to the Thompson parts at the Kilgore plant is still a mystery.</p>



<p><strong>Kilgore Today</strong></p>



<p>Kilgore, Inc. relocated from Westerville, Ohio to Tennessee in 1961. Around the time of the move, Kilgore merged with another company owned by the Commercial Credit Company &#8211; the Harvell Corporation. At the time, Harvell was well known for its houseware products. Two plants were initially opened, one in Bolivar, TN and one in Toone, TN. The plant in Bolivar manufactured toy cap pistols and houseware products, the plant in Toone manufactured caps and military pyrotechnics. The name Kilgore, Inc. was changed to Harvell-Kilgore Corporation. In 1963, Commercial Credit sold the Harvell-Kilgore Corporation to the American Snuff Company of Memphis, TN. American Snuff later became the Conwood Corporation. Because of declining sales, Conwood later ceased production of houseware products and dropped the name Harvell from the corporate name. In 1981, Allegany International purchased the Kilgore Corporation. Around 1985, Kilgore stopped the production of cap guns. In 1991, the production of caps ended when the cap making machines were sold to a company in New York. The Kilgore Corporation was acquired in 2001 by a British company and is now known as Kilgore Flares LLC, a member of the Chemring Group. Kilgore has been involved in many ventures throughout its history, but two areas, toy cap pistols and pyrotechnics have always been the mainstay of the business. Today, the toys and caps are no more, but Kilgore Flares is a known leader throughout the world in the development and production of airborne expendable countermeasure decoy flares.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="411" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/014-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13564" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/014-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/014-4-300x176.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/014-4-600x352.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A section of the 1979 Kilgore Catalog featuring the T.A.C. SQUAD Playset. (Tim Goss collection)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Kilgore Tommy Guns</strong></p>



<p>Kilgore did produce a toy Thompson while located in Tennessee. It was part of a toy set known as the “Special Agent Playset.” This toy first appeared in the 1973 Kilgore Toy Catalog.</p>



<p>The Special Agent Playset was featured in Kilgore Catalogs until 1977 or 1978. In 1979, a new Playset, “Tactical Assault Command Squad,” was featured with a similar Tommy Gun. This Playset was also included in the 1980 Kilgore toy catalog.</p>



<p>Tim Goss, a prominent Kilgore collector from Westerville, Ohio, reported all the Tommy Gun Playsets, along with the individual toy guns and accessories contained in the Playsets, are quite scarce today.</p>



<p><strong>The End of the Kilgore Story</strong></p>



<p>Unfortunately, the end of the Kilgore story is far from complete. Given the passage of time it is going to be very difficult to obtain additional first hand information from the parties involved at Kilgore. Many parties interviewed for this story were in their 80s and 90s. Additional documentary evidence will certainly surface in the future, much like the information in this article that came to light. However, one issue that can now be laid to rest is what Kilgore planned to do with the Thompson business. Kilgore was (and always has been) a manufacturing company. The Kilgore brochure clearly shows Kilgore planned to be a manufacturer of the Thompson submachine gun. Of course, the manufacturing of the M1A1 Thompson by Kilgore did not take place &#8211; other than the possible assembly from parts of a few guns. The IRS investigation and other sources cited above, established that Kilgore purchased the Thompson from Maguire Industries and firmly established ownership of the Thompson for Kilgore Manufacturing, the Willis group and the Numrich Arms Company.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V11N12 (September 2008)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
