<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Bartocci &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/bartocci/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:29:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>THE BARRETT MODEL 648 6.8MM REM SPC</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-barrett-model-648-6-8mm-rem-spc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N2 (Nov 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.8mm REM SPC cartridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armalite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bartocci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Barrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Bartocci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Fedderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global War on Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hornady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis Machine & Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M14 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M16/AR-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M16/M16A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M16A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M4 Carbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M648]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M855 Ball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Westrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mk12 Rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mk262 MOD 1 cartridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSG Steve Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precision Reflex Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Swan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronnie Barrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selective Integrated Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra 77-grain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N2]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Christopher Bartocci Ever since the change over from the 7.62x51mm to the current 5.56x45mm there has been controversy between two fundamental schools of thought on what a military cartridge should be. The United States military can be summed up in one word: tradition. In the 1960s, that tradition clouded the vision that a new [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Christopher Bartocci</strong></em></p>



<p>Ever since the change over from the 7.62x51mm to the current 5.56x45mm there has been controversy between two fundamental schools of thought on what a military cartridge should be. The United States military can be summed up in one word: tradition. In the 1960s, that tradition clouded the vision that a new dawn of small arms development in both concept, mechanics and ammunition had come. Still entrenched in the “one shot, one kill” mentality, our soldiers were sent into combat in Vietnam with the M14 which many considered to be an inferior weapon to the AK47 assault rifle that the enemy used. The enemy were able to lay controlled large volume of automatic fire on positions which, in a meeting engagement, will win you a fight. Our soldiers were equipped with a heavy recoil rifle that was impossible to control on fully-automatic. The accuracy was of no use because the enemy could not be seen.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="700" height="395" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-22.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13102" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-22.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-22-300x169.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-22-600x339.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The M855 Ball projectile (top) and a cut-away (bottom). Notice that there are three components to this bullet. The copper jacket, the steel penetrator core and the lead plug. This bullet design has caused the major accuracy and terminal performance problems that have been experienced with the M16A2 and M4 carbines. (Photo by Jim Wesley)</figcaption></figure>



<p>With much trepidation, the military adopted the AR-15 rifle destined to become the M16/M16A1. A new age of small caliber high velocity cartridges gave way to providing an individual soldier with firepower he had never had before. The 5.56x45mm cartridge utilizing a .224 diameter 55-grain full metal jacketed bullet proved to be a great asset to the American fighting man with the ability to have a lightweight rifle that was completely controllable on fully-automatic fire and the soldier could carry more than twice the combat load with an M16 than he could with the heavy M14 rifle.</p>



<p><strong>The Third Generation M16A2 and M855 Ball</strong></p>



<p>With the product improvements of the M16A2 the weapon system was enhanced. Due to the heavier 62-grain bullet, 1 turn in 7 inch rifling twist and new fully adjustable rear sight, both penetration and long range accuracy were enhanced. However, the culprit of the future problems with ammunition terminal performance would come from the ammunition, the M855 Ball.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="583" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-22.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13106" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-22.jpg 583w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-22-250x300.jpg 250w" sizes="(max-width: 583px) 100vw, 583px" /><figcaption>Three bullets. The first (left) is the M855 ball projectile with the penetrator core shown above. The middle projectile is the 77-grain Open Tip Match bullet that is loaded in the Mk262 MOD1 ammunition and the last is the 115-grain Sierra Open Tip Match bullet as loaded in the pre-production 6.8mm Rem SPC cartridge.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The M855 Ball is a three piece bullet consisting of a copper jacket, lead plug and a steel penetrator core in the tip. This bullet was designed for a machine gun, not a rifle. With the onset of the Global War on Terrorism, terminal deficiencies were found using M855 Ball, particularly in M4 carbines, when striking thin, malnourished, Taliban and Iraqi soldiers. There was a serious inconsistency in at what point the bullet would yaw and splinter. Some lots of ammunition would penetrate only slightly within inches and yaw and splinter. Others would go straight through and never yaw nor splinter. This caused serous knockdown problems particularly with the decreased velocity of 14.5 inch carbine barrel.</p>



<p>A solution put forth by the United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM) was the creation of a new and improved 5.56x45mm cartridge that would increase long range accuracy and terminal performance with consistency. Accuracy is seriously degraded in the M16A2/A4/M4 due to the inherent characteristics of the M855 bullet. The penetrator core degrades accuracy and if not manufactured properly, the center of gravity will be off causing the bullet to become a “flyer.” Additionally, in the area of terminal performance, there was no consistency from lot to lot on what exactly it would do upon hitting a human target.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="588" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13109" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-21-300x252.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-21-600x504.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Performance chart comparing the terminal performance of the 5.56 M855 Ball, 5.56x45mm Mk262, MOD 0 and two 6.8mm SPC cartridges. Notice the similarity of the Mk262, MOD 0 and the 110-grain 6.8mm SPC cartridge. The penetration and temporary/permanent wound cavities are very comparable. The other two show significantly more penetration. Courtesy USSOCOM</figcaption></figure>



<p>The answer was the Mk 262 MOD 1 cartridge that SOCOM adopted. This is a Sierra 77-grain open tip match bullet loaded by Black Hills. This is undoubtedly the most effective 5.56x45mm military cartridge in the world manufactured to match grade specifications with combat reliability. The long range accuracy was drastically increased and its terminal performance enhanced. This new projectile works well regardless of the type of target and performs considerably better on human targets in all known distances and conditions. This round is used almost exclusively by SOCOM operators in their M4A1 carbines and Mk12 rifles. This solution satisfied most of the SOCOM operators: except for one.</p>



<p><strong>The 6.8x43mm REM SPC</strong></p>



<p>The 5th Special Forces, particularly MSG Steve Holland, felt that there was still room for improvement. The concept was not original. The U.S. military experimented with the possibility of the 6mm caliber projectile being the ideal compromise of accuracy, range and terminal performance. In the late 1970s the concept was abandoned in favor of the 5.56x45mm battle rifle.</p>



<p>With the assistance of the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit, Holland came up with a concept for a 6mm cartridge that could be fired in the M4 platform. The starting point was the .30 Remington cartridge which is merely a rimless .30-30 Win. round. It was trimmed and resized to accept a 6.8mm projectile. This concept, along with the hand-loaded experimental ammunition and CAD drawings went to Remington Arms. Remington wanted to aid in the Global War on Terrorism so they took on the task of developing the ammunition.</p>



<p>The 6.8mm REM SPC cartridge has been mostly a myth for the last few years due to the fact it has been developed quietly and kept proprietary. No ammunition has been made as of this writing in large quantities due to the fact the ammunition is being perfected before it will be shipped. Remington has reported three small runs of ammunition including ball and match grade ammunition. Hornady has also produced some loads in this new caliber.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="366" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13110" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-19.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-19-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-19-600x314.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Close-up showing the threads and thread protector for mounting a silencer. The front sight is engaged on this Barrett designed front sight assembly. This particular carbine is equipped with a muzzle break. This greatly increases controllability on full automatic.</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The Firearms</strong></p>



<p>Prototype rifles were manufactured by Precision Reflex, Inc. (PRI). Dave Dunlap assembled upper receivers with free floating handguards or A.R.M.S., Inc. SIR systems and the OPSINC silencer and muzzle break. Dunlap also was charged with designing the magazine which is different from the standard 5.56x45mm magazine. Currently, PRI has been the only producer of 6.8x43mm Rem SPC magazines. PRI also produces complete upper receivers chambered in the 6.8x43mm Rem SPC cartridge.</p>



<p><strong>The Barrett M648</strong></p>



<p>At the 2004 SHOT Show, Ronnie Barrett unveiled a new product line: his M648. This company, dedicated to .50 BMG caliber specialized weapons, introduced the first production 6.8x43mm Rem SPC firearm and has taken the lead on this project. While the cartridge is still technically under development (to be more correct would be to say “tweaked”), Barrett has teamed up with Peter Forras to work with Remington to optimize the weapon and cartridge. Forras has spent much time down at Remington working with them to perfect the 6.8x43mm cartridge.</p>



<p>The rifle has been based on the standard M16-platform. Barrett offers the rifle in both commercial and law enforcement/military configurations. The “bells and whistles” are the same for both versions, the only real difference is the use of selective fire, flash suppressors, bayonet lugs and telescopic stock on the law enforcement/military models.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="455" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13111" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-16-300x195.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-16-600x390.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Above is a 100-grain Barnes X bullet that was fired at 50 yards into a 1/4 inch steel plate. The same bullet (right) fired into ballistic gelatin.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The weapon as offered uses a mid-length gas system developed by Mark Westrom of ArmaLite, Inc. This mid length gas system changes the location of the gas port by placing it further forward than the carbine and slightly behind the rifle. This gives two major advantages: reliability and durability. By putting more distance between the bolt carrier and gas port, lower port pressures are created resulting in the bolt assembly’s velocity being slower. This increases reliability in extraction as well as extending the life of the bolt and some of the trigger components.</p>



<p>The barrel is manufactured by Fred Fedderson. This 1 turn in 10 inch twist barrel is chrome plated and is currently available in 16 inch length only. Barrett has plans on offering 12 and 20 inch barrels in the near future. The commercial version has a muzzle check similar to the one used by ArmaLite, Inc. The law enforcement/military versions use the standard M16-style muzzle break/compensator</p>



<p>The M648 gas block utilizes a folding front sight assembly. This assembly was designed by Barrett. On the law enforcement/military version, there is a threaded collet on the edge of the gas bock to install the silencer.</p>



<p><strong>The Mid-Length SIR System</strong></p>



<p>The A.R.M.S. Inc. SIR (Selective Integrated Rail) system developed by Richard Swan is the solution for many problems associated with military use of this type of weapon system. The SIR system is a free-floating handguard assembly that attaches to the carrying handle by a sleeve that goes on top of the rail (thus protecting it) as well as directly to the barrel nut. This give an extended top rail that runs the entire length of the upper receiver to the front sight assembly. There are four Mil-Std 1913 rails that enable optics, laser, flashlights and whatever other accessories that may be needed for the rifle with no effect on the barrel and its performance.</p>



<p>Free floating a military weapon has many benefits. First would be accuracy. With nothing impeding on the harmonics of the barrel, better uniform accuracy is achieved. Additionally, the barrel remains cooler as there is significantly better air circulation enabling the weapon to fire longer on full automatic fire. Another benefit, particularly with a hot barrel, pulling down on a vertical fore grip will not cause the barrel to bend or droop. The SIR system may also have a M203 grenade launcher attached to it. All the current models of the M648 feature the A.R.M.S. Inc. SIR system as well as the ARMS #40 L emergency flip-up backup sight.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="366" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13112" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-12-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-12-600x314.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The bolt utilized on the M648 designed by Chris Barrett. It is a modified version of the LMT Enhanced bolt but customized for the 6.8 SPC cartridge. Notice the “lobster tail” extractor with dual extractor springs.</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The Bolt</strong></p>



<p>The bolt carrier is standard M16/AR-15. The difference lies in the bolt itself. The bolt was designed by Chris Barrett and is manufactured by Lewis Machine &amp; Tool (LMT). The bolt uses the trademark dual extractor spring “lobster tail” extractor manufactured by LMT as it is more durable and reliable. The bolt has other similarities to the LMT Enhanced bolt but Barrett made some changes in materials and specifications specifically for the M648. The bolt has a nickel plating on it.</p>



<p><strong>Configurations</strong></p>



<p>The M648 comes as a full weapon with fixed rifle stock as well as selective fire carbine lower receiver with the telescopic buttstock. The system is also sold as an upgrade or a conversion kit which will include the entire upper receiver assembly and magazine. The conversions can be obtained with either selective fire bolt carriers or semiautomatic only. It should be noted that when putting a conversion on a standard selective fire carbine lower receiver, the “H” buffer should be used. This is the buffer with two steel weights and one tungsten. If the standard three steel weight buffer is used the carbine may experience bolt carrier bounce resulting in light strikes on full automatic. This is not an issue with the full length rifle selective fire lower receiver. Semiautomatic guns can use either due to the bolt group will have sufficient time to lock before the next shot is fired. There has been some discussion about Barrett eventually coming out with a piston driven mechanism for this weapon system.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="169" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13113" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-12-300x72.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-12-600x145.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Close-up view of the A.R.M.S. SIR system that was specifically designed for the Barrett M648. Notice it says CAL 6.8 just above the end of the ejection port. This is the special design for the mid-length gas system. The bottom of the hand guard may be removed to install a grenade launcher.</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Shooting Impressions</strong></p>



<p>The rifle received for testing was a law enforcement/military upper receiver with a standard semiautomatic only lower receiver. The author’s own Colt M4 full automatic carbine lower was used for full automatic testing. The semi-automatic only lower receiver was equipped with an LMT two-stage match grade trigger. The optics used were the M68 Aim Point Comp II, EOTech holographic sight as well as the standard backup sights. Approximately 700 rounds were fired in total in both semiautomatic for accuracy as well as fully automatic for functionality. The magazine used was a PRI made 28-round steel magazine. The ammunition was manufactured by Remington.</p>



<p>Fully-automatic tests were conducted in close quarter battle conditions. Targets ranged from 5 to 25 meters. The cyclic rate was about the same as the standard M4 carbine and recoil was really not that much more. There was no problem controlling the weapon. The EOTech sight made shooting easier allowing both eyes to remain open increasing speed and accuracy. By adjusting the brightness of the sight, it was useful for both close tactical work as well as short range sniping.</p>



<p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p>



<p>The 6.8mm Rem SPC is without a doubt an improvement over the existing 5.56x45mm for military use. But the question is, how much better? The cartridge unfortunately has a very steep uphill battle ahead of it once the military community gets a hold of it. The weapon itself is not an issue. The M16-based design is well proven. But in order for SOCOM in particular to adopt such a cartridge for use will be a gigantic undertaking. First and foremost it has to be more than better, it will have to be drastically better and offer a large advantage. Second, and perhaps the most critical, will be logistics. The cartridge will be at best used by SOCOM operators and them alone. From a logistical standpoint, adding a new cartridge into inventory, in particular one nobody else in the service uses, can cause serious problems. Once SOCOM operators are deployed they become part of the unit they are assigned and along with that goes their supply. Having non-compatible ammunition can put the operators at risk given they do not have re-supply specific to them.</p>



<p>The Barrett M648 and 6.8x43mm Rem SPC ammunition performed flawlessly and accurately. Barrett has not been too quick to go into production due to the fact they have waited until the development of the rifle and ammunition was completed insuring their customers get a final production weapon and not a semi-prototype. As of this writing, after more than three years of advertising and manufacturing of barrels to fire this new cartridge, the ammunition has yet to be completed and put into full production. This weapon and cartridge will undoubtedly find a following in law enforcement and commercial shooters and competitors. As far as the military use of this weapons system, only time will tell.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N2 (November 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE COLT SCAR WEAPONS TYPE C</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-colt-scar-weapons-type-c/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1 (Oct 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back Up Iron Sight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bartocci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher R. Bartocci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt SCAR Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN-FAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grip Pod Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M16/M4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M16A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M4A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mk 262 Mod 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCT Defense UltraChem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winchester]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A burst of automatic fire from the Colt SCAR Type C. Notice the two fired cartridge cases ejecting from the carbine. This carbine was tested during the SCAR trials and was very used and abused. The ammunition being fired is Black Hills manufactured Mk262 Mod 1 77-grain Open Tip Match bullet. By Christopher R. Bartocci [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>A burst of automatic fire from the Colt SCAR Type C. Notice the two fired cartridge cases ejecting from the carbine. This carbine was tested during the SCAR trials and was very used and abused. The ammunition being fired is Black Hills manufactured Mk262 Mod 1 77-grain Open Tip Match bullet.</em></p>



<p><em>By <strong>Christopher R. Bartocci</strong></em></p>



<p><em>Last month we looked at Type’s A and B of Colt’s SCAR (Special operations forces Combat Assault Rifle) program. Both used the traditional gas impingement system as found in the M16/M4 family of weapons and fared very well in the trials. However, there was an unwritten requirement that SOCOM wanted a conventional piston operated weapon. They felt it would be more clean and reliable under the extreme circumstances that they operated under.</em></p>



<p>Colt set out to develop their own piston driven mechanism. Piston systems were nothing new to Colt as they had experimented with it many years ago. In the late 1960s to early 1970s, experimentation was going on at Colt, Rock Island and Winchester to develop a standard piston mechanism to deal with the problems the early rifles had with the switch-over to ball powder. This also was as a response to the publicity of the reliability of the AK47. In the end, a report in 1968 stated that the 10 prototype weapons performed about equal to the current M16A1 rifles. Colt developed the model 703 as a piston driven operating system. Although totally unlike the current SCAR design, it indicates that Colt had investigated this in the past. The 703 was a full-length rifle with a piston rod that was attached to the bolt carrier, much like the AK-type piston. By the time Colt had concluded the development of the 703, all the changes made to the M16A1 and ammunition made a piston-operated mechanism unnecessary.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="737" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-122.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11370" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-122.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-122-285x300.jpg 285w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-122-600x632.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Cover of the operator’s manual provided to SOCOM with the Colt SCAR-L &#8211; Type C.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The Colt 703 rifle when fired, the bullet would propel down the barrel, and gas was bled from the barrel into the gas cylinder created between the end of the piston rod and the front sight base. The piston rod, being attached to the bolt carrier group, would move rearward extracting and ejecting the fired cartridge case. When the bolt carrier group reaches it’s furthest rearward motion the buffer/buffer spring would drive the bolt carrier group forward stripping a round from the magazine, chambering it, and the bolt would lock into battery ready for the next shot.</p>



<p><strong>Colt SCAR Type C</strong></p>



<p>SOCOM’s unwritten requirement for a piston operated rifle was based upon their belief that this system kept the gun cleaner due to hot gasses not being blown into the bolt carrier causing fouling. This is especially true when being fired with a suppressor.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="367" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-117.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11372" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-117.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-117-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-117-600x315.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The Type C SCAR was not the first time Colt looked into the design of a piston operated gas system in the M16 weapon system. Shown is the Colt model 703 designed in the late 1960s to</em> <em>early ’70s. (Photo courtesy of Collector Grade Publications)</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>Colt began work to design their own piston system. With the requirement for a free-floated barrel, Colt opted to use their newly designed one-piece upper receiver. Keeping the legacy M4 platform was important as it was very user friendly. Once the shooter grasps the pistol grip, all manipulations of the selector and magazine catch can be made without manipulation of the shooters hand. The left hand will insert the loaded magazine a hit the bolt catch to reload. Due to the magazine dropping free and the bolt holding open on the last shot, reloading can be accomplished is seconds. An added benefit to keeping this platform was taking advantage of the existing familiarity of the operators’ use with the M4A1 carbine.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="489" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-100.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11326" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-100.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-100-300x210.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-100-600x419.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The Colt 703 disassembled. This is the basic AK47 piston system where the piston rod is connected to the bolt carrier. The lower receiver remained the standard lower. All modifications were made to the upper receiver. After modifications were made to the direct gas system to cope with the use of ball propellant, this design was dropped due to little to no benefit in reliability. (Photo courtesy of Collector Grade Publications)</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The SCAR Type C Upper Receiver</strong></p>



<p>The upper receiver chosen was the Colt proprietary one-piece upper receiver. This allowed the barrel to be mounted to the receiver and permitted to free float; increasing accuracy as well as assist in cooling. The upper receiver utilizes a forward assist assembly, fired cartridge case deflector and an ejection port dust cover. There is a continuous Mil-Std 1913 rail that goes from the top of the charging handle area to the front sight base. This will allow the mounting of multiple optics including night vision, reflex sight as well as a laser. The side rails allow the operator to mount flashlights or other accessories. The bottom portion of the rail is removable allowing the mounting of a grenade launcher. When the standard cover with the rail is on, a vertical pistol grip may be installed. During testing, the newly designed Grip Pod Systems vertical pistol grip was used. This vertical pistol grip/bipod is made of 7075 T6 aircraft aluminum, the same as the Colt SCAR receivers. The bottom of the grip turns into a spring-loaded bipod with a push of a button. When the operator drops to the prone position and engages the bipod, the carbine has a stable base for aimed firing. When the bipod is engaged and the weapon shouldered, the magazine will not snag on the ground.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="386" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-86.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11374" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-86.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-86-300x165.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-86-600x331.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Side views of the Colt Type C. Although it looks like an M4 carbine, it is quite different. Notice the new UCT Defense UltraChem (Universal Chem Tech) Nickel Boron finish on the bolt carrier as well as the ambidextrous selector lever with the new 90 degree travel. Note the folded front sight assembly.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The carbine utilizes the same BUIS (Back Up Iron Sight) as the Colt Type A. The rear sight is a modified Colt carrying handle rear sight. Colt took a standard carrying handle and removed the handle just leaving a lightweight rear sight. There are no sharp edges to snag. It is adjustable for elevation out to 600 meters and has two sight apertures. A 0 to 200-meter close and a long-range aperture. However, any BUIS can be used whether it be an ARMS #40 L or a Knight Armament BUIS.</p>



<p>The front sight is a Colt designed foldable front sight assembly attached to the gas block. This same front sight assembly was used on all three of Colt’s entries and was activated and locked by a button on the left side. This utilized a square 4-notch front sight post and is adjustable for elevation only.</p>



<p><strong>The Colt Piston Operating System</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="270" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-56.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11328" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-56.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-56-300x116.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-56-600x231.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Detail of the side of the receivers. Notice the retention of the forward assist and fired cartridge case deflector. The addition of an ambidextrous sling adapter is in place of the sliding receiver end plate. Also, the Colt BUIS (Back Up Iron Sight) is seen showing the adjustments for both windage and elevation. You can see the Norgon ambidextrous magazine catch as well as the 90 degree selector lever. Also, all Colt entries utilized the improved hammer/trigger pins made of stainless steel for additional strength during extended firing. Notice the “O2” written on both the upper and lower receivers. This is the Crane designation for the Colt Type C SCAR candidate.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The piston system is very simple and very reliable. In firearms design there are two basic piston systems. The first is where the piston/operating rod is directly attached to the bolt carrier such as the AK47/AKM. The second is the short-stroke tappet where the operating rod strikes the face of the bolt carrier driving the carrier rearward while the piston rod reciprocates back to its rested position in front of the firearm such as the AR18, SKS and FN FAL.</p>



<p>The system chosen by Colt is the latter. By going with the two-piece operating rod the weight may be decreased. Colt has been working on their piston systems for a couple of years in their model shop. In 2003, a prototype was made showing an early attempt of their system. Over the next couple years their design would be modified and perfected to the final system they chose for their SCAR candidate</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="614" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-45.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11329" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-45.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-45-300x263.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-45-600x526.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Colt BUIS (Back Up Iron Sight). This design came from the standard M4/M16A4 detachable carrying handle with all unnecessary material removed as well as the edges smoothed to give the lightest and most compact sight possible.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The final system begins with their proprietary one-piece upper receiver. The barrel is secured to the inside of the receiver and the barrel left free-floating. The system consists of the op rod and return spring. The front of the system consists of the gas cylinder and the mechanism is locked into the weapon by a large pin in the front sight/gas block. There is a gas relief vent in front of the gas cylinder that vents through the front of the front sight assembly. Colt has tested this operating mechanism with over 18,000 rounds without cleaning and without failure. This piston system does not require routine maintenance during cleaning.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="336" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-39.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11376" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-39.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-39-300x144.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-39-600x288.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Top: Showing the top rail of the Colt one-piece upper receiver. Notice the continuous Mil-Std 1913 rail that runs from the rear of the receiver to the front sight assembly. This enables the mounting of numerous optics including reflex sight with a night vision scope. Center: Top view of the standard carbine version of the SCAR Type C. Notice the numerous vent holes to aid in cooling on the sides of the dovetail. Bottom: Bottom of the Colt one-piece upper receiver with the bottom of the hand guard removed. Notice the fact the carbine has a heavy barrel to better handle the excessive firing schedules demanded by SOCOM. This barrel is also free floating which aids in accuracy and cooling and no pressure is put on the barrel from utilizing a vertical pistol grip.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>As the bullet travels down the barrel upon firing, the bullet passes the gas port and gas is directed into the gas expansion chamber, driving the piston rearward. The rear of the piston impacts a modified carrier key on the bolt carrier group driving the carrier group rearward. While the carrier group continues rearward, the piston rod returns to its forward resting position. On the bolt carrier group’s rearward travel the bolt unlocks, extracting and ejecting the fired cartridge case from the carbine. Then the compressed heavy buffer and spring return the carrier group forward stripping an unfired cartridge from the magazine, feeding it into the chamber, and then the bolt locks into the barrel extension. The carbine is ready for the next shot to be fired. Another benefit of the piston-operated system is the ability to set the cyclic rate of the weapon. Colt chose to make the SCAR Type C fire at 800 rounds per minute comparable to that of the M4A1 with Mk 262 Mod 1 ammunition.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="431" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-27.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11379" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-27.jpg 431w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-27-185x300.jpg 185w" sizes="(max-width: 431px) 100vw, 431px" /><figcaption><em>Face of the front sight assembly. Notice the gas relief vent which sits behind the cylinder. Also notice the 4 position square front sight post. To the left is the button which is pushed in to engage and disengage the front sight.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The Bolt Carrier</strong></p>



<p>The bolt carrier group looks very similar to the standard M16/M4 family of firearms but with one major change: a new bolt carrier key. Also, there are no gas rings on the bolt due to the expansion chamber being in the front sight assembly instead of the back of the bolt carrier group. Another innovation that Colt has done is to change the finish of the bolt and carrier. It has a proprietary UCT Defense UltraChem (nickel boron) finish to eliminate the need for any lubricant whatsoever. This slippery finish needs merely a wipe with a rag to clean. This coating also improves corrosion resistance. The extractor utilizes the improved gold extractor spring with the stronger black extractor buffer.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="540" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-20.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11381" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-20.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-20-300x231.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-20-600x463.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Top: An example of a very early machine shop prototype of Colt’s gas system. The piston rod is removed by pulling in to the rear and lifting up. The piston cylinder sits in the front sight assembly. There is a piston return spring as well to return the piston forward after it impacts the bolt carrier to force it rearward. Center: Disassembled prototype piston assembly. Notice the rod guide (rear), the return spring, the piston rod, as well as the cylinder. This design was altered due to the fact Colt used a one-piece upper receiver. The piston system would have to be inserted from the front of the front sight assembly instead of the top of the barrel. This early system utilized a standard M4 upper receiver. Bottom: Piston rod shown on top of the Type C upper receiver. The cylinder and return spring are not shown.</em></figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="152" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-17.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11383" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-17.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-17-300x65.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-17-600x130.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The right side of the Type C bolt carrier assembly. The entire assembly has the new UCT (Universal Chem Technologies) Nickel Boron finish. This finish virtually eliminated the need to lubricate. Notice the modified carrier key which has been cut back and modified for the piston rod to impact. No gas rings are needed and the carrier retains the forward assist notches.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The Barrel</strong></p>



<p>As per specifications, the barrels come in two different lengths. The standard carbine barrel length is 14.5 inches and the CQC (Close Quarter Combat) barrel is 10.5 inches. Both barrels are heavy barrels to insure they can take the required heavy firing schedule demanded by SOCOM. The barrel utilizes the standard 1 turn in 7 inch rifling twist that is required to stabilize the Mk 262 Mod 1 ammunition currently in use by SOCOM. Additionally, as per requirements, a Knight’s Armament Quick Detach flash suppressor is installed for use with the silencer. The front sight base has a bayonet lug for mounting a bayonet on both barrels even though one cannot be mounted on the 10.5 inch barrel.</p>



<p>The chamber has been modified to comply with the “Over the Beach” requirement specified for the SEALS.</p>



<p><strong>The Lower Receiver</strong></p>



<p>The lower receiver is identical to the ones used on Type A and B. It is a standard M4A1 lower receiver with the modified selector lever. As per requirement, this ambidextrous selector operates over 90 degrees of travel (as opposed to the Colt standard of 180 degrees). After testing was completed, this change was not well received. The reasoning in unclear as to whether they were just too used to the standard or if it did not manipulate as fast as the original.</p>



<p>The magazine release is the patented Norgon ambidextrous version. The stock is the VLTOR stock with dual battery compartments for the optics. This is a standard four-position Colt buffer extension with a H2 buffer. Due to the carbine utilizing a heavy barrel, the buffer with 2 tungsten weights and 1 steel weight was necessary to prevent light strikes from bolt carrier bounce. Improved hammer/trigger pins are used that are manufactured of stainless steel. This increases service life especially with heavy volume of fire required of the SCAR weapon. The finish is done in the required flat earth finish (coyote brown) done by Kal-Guard.</p>



<p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p>



<p>The opportunity arose to test fire Colt’s Type C SCAR in their engineering range in the basement of the factory. There was little difference in the feel between the direct gas and the piston driven carbines and their cyclic rate was about the same. The carbine fired was quite worn and neglected from the SCAR trials. However, the carbine functioned flawlessly; firing nearly 500 rounds in 15 minutes. The bolt carrier group was completely dry without lubricant.</p>



<p>There seems to be little doubt that the next generations of M16/M4 carbines will be piston driven mechanisms. Colt plans to introduce a piston driven law enforcement carbine in early 2006.</p>



<p>With the SCAR program moving forward with procurement from FN Mfg. Inc., only time will tell how the new weapons will stack up compared to the M4A1 carbines currently in use. The SCAR trials were without a doubt the most grueling small arms testing in the world since the original Armalite AR-15 was pitted against the government designed M14. Lessons learned in this weapons development program will influence further research and development of further upgrades or new weapons designs of the future.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N1 (October 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
