<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Garand &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/garand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>How One Marine Sergeant Worked in the Korean War Trenches to Outfit His Unit with Select-Fire Garands</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/how-one-marine-sergeant-worked-in-the-korean-war-trenches-to-outfit-his-unit-with-select-fire-garands/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Ring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hal Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korean War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USMC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=46800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the ingenuity of one man, a Marine infantry unit serving in the Korean War was equipped with M1 Garand rifles capable of full-auto fire. This is the story of selective fire Garands built by then Marine Staff Sergeant Harold Johnson that were used in combat during the Korean War.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Tom Ring</em></p>



<p>Thanks to the ingenuity of one man, a Marine infantry unit serving in the Korean War was equipped with M1 Garand rifles capable of full-auto fire. This is the story of selective fire Garands built by then Marine Staff Sergeant Harold Johnson that were used in combat during the Korean War.</p>



<p>During the Korean War, WWII Marine combat veteran Harold Johnson, at the time a staff sergeant, was serving as platoon sergeant in 1<sup>st</sup> Battalion, 5<sup>th</sup> Marine Regiment. During his time there, the Korean Army was largely out of the fight, and the enemy were the Chinese communists. The war was fairly static, and his unit spent the bulk of their time in an established bunker and trench line. There were frequent Marine night patrols forward of their line to keep themselves informed of enemy troop activities. Most of the Chinese troops in his area were armed with the Soviet PPSH submachine gun. Naturally most of Hals Marines were armed with the M1 Garand or M1 Carbine with approximately one Thompson submachine gun and one Browning Automatic rifle per squad. In short, he felt that his patrols were short of firepower when they engaged in skirmishes with the Chinese during patrols.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="536" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop-1024x536.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46808" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop-1024x536.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop-768x402.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop-750x393.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop-1140x597.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-REPO-Full-Riflle_crop.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Right side view of a reproduction full-auto-only M1 Garand rifle made according to Hal Johnson’s original specifications. (Tom Ring)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Accordingly, Hal Johnson modified several Garands, though the total number is unknown, to be capable of selective fire. He did this work in the field, which is testimony to his skill. Also bear in mind that Hal Johnson was a tanker in WWII, and an infantryman after that; it was not until after the Korean War that he moved into the Ordnance Corps.</p>



<p>During our many conversations, Hal stated to me that he always sent at least two of his modified rifles out with each patrol. In use, the modified rifles provided good, reliable service. They put lots of rounds in the direction of the enemy and helped keep their heads down. On occasion the front hand guard would char or even smoke from the overheated barrel. A story Hal liked to tell was of a buddy of his from WWII arriving at his unit. This guy’s attitude was “a Springfield was good enough to shoot Japanese, its good enough to shoot Chinese.” Accordingly, he carried a Springfield on his first night patrol, made contact with the enemy and heard burp-gun fire all around him. Upon his return to friendly lines, he promptly asked Hal for one of his modified Garands.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="647" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-1024x647.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46809" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-1024x647.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-300x190.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-768x485.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-750x474.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-1140x720.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A photo from Hal Johnson’s collection of his Korean War battlefield-modified, selective fire M1 Garand rifle which he hand captioned, “Selective fire M1 Korea mud 52 1/5”. 1/5 was his Marine infantry unit. (Courtesy Tom Ring)</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">HOW WAS THE RIFLE MODIFIED</h2>



<p>The modification made by Johnson was simple in design and was reliable. Starting with the trigger group and working forward, the left disconnector hook is ground off of the hammer to prevent that left hook from engaging. A trip lever is fabricated and installed inside a channel cut inside the stock. This trip lever has a lug welded to its rear that protrudes into the action of the gun. This lug engages with the right side of the disconnector. This trip lever pivots on the selector switch to the rear of the center of the trip lever. A spring is installed under the rear of this trip lever to provide upward tension. A transfer bar is fabricated and installed on the outside of the stock below the charging handle. It pivots at its center and has no spring tension on it. The charging handle is ground flat on its front surface. The transfer bar and trip lever were fabricated from M1919 and M2 .50 caliber feed cover belt feed levers. Disclaimer: This is not a how-to guide on building your own full auto M1. Do not modify an M1 to fire full auto unless you are in possession of the appropriate licenses.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="468" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-1024x468.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46807" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-1024x468.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-300x137.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-768x351.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-750x343.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand-1140x521.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1-Hal-Johnson-Select-Fire-M1-Garand.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A copy photo of Hal Johnson’s Korean War battlefield-modified selective fire M1 rifle with the trigger group removed. (Courtesy Tom Ring)</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">HOW THE RIFLE WORKS, THE CYCLE OF OPERATION</h2>



<p>When the rifle is fired, the operating rod moves to the rear, bringing the bolt with it. At the beginning of this movement, the flat surface of the charging handle moves away from the transfer bar. Spring tension on the rear of the trip lever moves it up out of engagement with the right side of the disconnector. toward the end of the rearward travel of the bolt, the hammer will lock in the rearward position, held by the disconnector on the remaining right lug on the hammer. As the bolt is returning forward, and just as the bolt locks up, the flat cut into the front of the charging handle impacts the top of the transfer bar forcing the rear of this transfer bar up. This forces the front of the rear trip lever up, moving the rear of the trip lever down against spring tension. The lug welded to the rear of the trip lever pushes down on the right hook on the disconnector, pushing and holding it to the rear and releasing the hammer to fire the chambered round and firing the successive round. The cycle repeats as long as the trigger is held down, or until the rifle runs out of ammunition.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="536" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop-1024x536.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46810" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop-1024x536.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop-768x402.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop-750x393.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop-1140x597.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/4-REPO-CLOSE-UP_crop.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A close up of the reproduction rifle action, right side view. Shown are the trip lever and transfer bar, the spring tension upward on the trip lever, and the engagement of the front of the transfer bar with the flat cut into the charging handle. Unfortunately, the author shot these photos decades ago with a disposable camera. (Tom Ring)</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A MODERN REPRODUCTION OF HAL JOHNSONS DESIGN, PROOF OF CONCEPT</h2>



<p>Some years ago, in the post-1986 era, but prior to the advent of handheld movie studios, hence the low-quality photos taken with a disposable camera, a working copy of Hals design was built. It was built under my tutelage by a tax stamp holder. That individual has long since surrendered his tax stamp and the rifle was duly turned into the <a href="https://www.atf.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BATFE</a>. I like to think that it resides in their reference collection. It was built as a tool-room prototype with no attempt to make it pretty or field worthy. It also lacks the selective fire option and is full-auto only. This rifle ran and ran flawlessly for many rounds. The rate of fire was an estimated 600 rounds per minute. Controllability of this rifle was not great, but it was manageable for an experienced full-auto shooter. As the owner of an original M-14, I can state that it was more controllable than an M-14 in full-auto mode. It is worth noting that it is possible to build this design to operate at a rate of fire of 600 per minute up to 800 rounds per minute. To do this imagine the lock-up of the bolt and auto firing taking place during a very short window of time. If the rifle fires at the earliest moment in this window, the rate of fire will be faster. The reproduction rifle I fired could have been made to shoot at a higher RPM by adding metal to any contact surface in the linkage, causing a slightly earlier release of the hammer by the lug on the rear of the trip lever.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="536" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop-1024x536.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46811" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop-1024x536.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop-768x402.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop-750x393.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop-1140x597.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/5-REPO-DISS_crop.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">An unfortunately blurry close up taken with a disposable camera decades ago of the modified stock of the select-fire M1 Garand reproduction showing the trip lever and transfer bar, and the lug on the rear of the trip lever protruding into the stock cavity. (Tom Ring)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Though largely unknown, Garands capable of full-auto fire were used in combat in the Korean war by infantry Marines in 1/5 courtesy of the efforts of one smart and able man, Harold Johnson, who has gone largely unrecognized by history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The History of the&#8221;Italian FAL&#8221; – Beretta&#8217;s Long-Serving BM59</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-history-of-theitalian-fal-berettas-long-serving-bm59/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierangelo Tendas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearm History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beretta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BM59]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BM62]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M99]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=45038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[American readers may be surprised to know that Italy’s locally developed Beretta BM59 shared a moniker with the Cold War’s most popular service rifle, and that its roots hit a lot close to home. By Pierangelo Tendas Unlike former fellow Axis powers Germany and Japan, Italy was never forced to disarm and disband its forces [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>American readers may be surprised to know that Italy’s locally developed Beretta BM59 shared a moniker with the Cold War’s most popular service rifle, and that its roots hit a lot close to home.</em></p>



<p><em>By Pierangelo Tendas</em></p>



<p>Unlike former fellow Axis powers Germany and Japan, Italy was never forced to disarm and disband its forces in the aftermath of World War II. The events of the late stages of the war and the location at the center of the Mediterranean Sea made the country, now a republic, a key ally in a new world whose climate was rapidly turning chilly as the Cold War mounted.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-medium"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="238" height="300" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-02-238x300.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45045" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-02-238x300.jpg 238w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-02-811x1024.jpg 811w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-02-768x970.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-02-750x947.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-02.jpg 950w" sizes="(max-width: 238px) 100vw, 238px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Beretta BM59 rifle was first fielded by the Italian military in 1962, replacing the Carcano rifles retained from service after World War II and the M1 Garand rifles, M1 carbines, and Lee-Enfield SMLEs that had been donated by the Allies. (Italian Army and Beretta)</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The post-WWII Italian military was largely equipped with U.S. handovers, specifically M1 Garand .30-06 caliber rifles, for which Winchester also donated manufacturing machinery to Beretta and Breda. When NATO adopted the new 7.62×51mm as its standard unified service rifle caliber in 1954, the Italian Army arsenal in Terni took up the job of converting existing Garand rifles to the new cartridge, while Beretta and Breda started the manufacture of 7.62mm caliber M1s for foreign sales, most notably for Denmark.</p>



<p>The lessons learned of WWII, however, ushered in a new era where bolt-action, semi-automatic rifles, and light automatic rifles would be replaced – at least tentatively – by select-fire individual weapons that would cover most if not all roles in modern infantry. If the Belgian FN FAL and the Spanish CETME – improved to become the Heckler &amp; Koch G3 – would become by far the most successful in the category of individual weapons we today know as “battle rifles”, the U.S. would spend years and millions of dollars in an attempt to develop a totally new, totally domestic new service rifle that would still retain as many features of the beloved M1 Garand as possible; the result, the M14, is still controversial among historians and gun enthusiasts alike, and its tenure before replacement was very short if compared to its international counterparts.</p>



<p>Cash-strapped post-war Italy had to standardize doing what it could with what it had. A team of Beretta engineers headed by Domenico Salza and Vittorio Valle – both of whom had learned their trade from Tullio Marengoni, Beretta’s head engineer before and during WWII and the inventor of the MAB series of sub-machine guns – was tasked to create a new service rifle for the Italian military that could be produced with existing technologies.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="387" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03-1024x387.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45046" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03-1024x387.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03-300x114.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03-768x291.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03-750x284.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03-1140x431.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-03.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The right side of the Beretta BM59: the Garand lineage is evident. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The solution was simple: at first, existing M1 Garand rifles were modified to feed through detachable 20-round, double-stack, single-feed box magazines; the solution, known as the <a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/the-beretta-type-e-garand/">“Garand Type E”</a>, would later be further modified into a select-fire rifle with a shorter handguard and a peculiar muzzle device. The Beretta <em>Modello 1959</em>, or BM59 for short, was born. It’s deployment in the Italian military started in 1962.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">IF IT WORKS, DON’T CHANGE IT</h2>



<p>The BM59 was designed to be built around an essentially unmodified Garand action and a slightly modified Garand gas system and sear. Taking cues from another firearm that the Italian government had received in droves by the U.S. after WWII – the M1 carbine, and more specifically its select-fire counterpart, the M2 – the Beretta engineering team installed a fire selector on the left side of the receiver which, when switched from “S” (“<em>Semiautomatico</em>”) to “A” (“<em>Automatico</em>”), would activate a <a href="https://smallarmsreview.com/the-u-s-m2-carbine/">U.S. M2 Carbine</a> style disconnector lever assembly, allowing the BM59 to fire in full-automatic, at a cyclic rate of approximately 750 rounds per minute.</p>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-0162bae" data-block-id="0162bae"><div class="stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-0162bae-column">
<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-9fc3192" data-v="4" data-block-id="9fc3192"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-9fc3192-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-9fc3192-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="679" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07-1024x679.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45049" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07-1024x679.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07-768x509.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07-750x498.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07-1140x756.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-07.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The bolt of the BM59 locked in its open position, showing the elevator of the magazine. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-12e2fd4" data-v="4" data-block-id="12e2fd4"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-12e2fd4-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-12e2fd4-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="679" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-08-679x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45050" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-08-679x1024.jpg 679w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-08-199x300.jpg 199w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-08-768x1158.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-08-750x1131.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-08.jpg 796w" sizes="(max-width: 679px) 100vw, 679px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Bolt face of the BM59, once again showing its M1 Garand lineage; on top of it is the stripper clip guide that allows to fill the magazine without removing it. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>
</div></div>



<p>As anybody who has ever shoulder-fired 7.62×51mm NATO battle rifle in full-automatic, recoil was harsh… to say the least. In order to mitigate such a punishing factor, Beretta would issue every BM59 with a folding metal bipod, which allowed more accurate semi-automatic fire and provided a stable platform for full-automatic, sustained covering fire; note that back in the day, the standard support weapon for the Italian Armed Forces was the locally-built 7.62×51mm Beretta Mg.42/59 universal machine-gun, which required at least two men to carry and operate at squad level.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="679" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1-1024x679.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45056" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1-1024x679.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1-768x509.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1-750x498.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1-1140x756.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-16-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A signature feature of the Beretta BM59 rifle was its “tri-compensator”; a multifunctional muzzle device that doubled as a muzzle brake, flash hider, and grenade launcher for 75mm MECAR Energa and Super-Energa rifle grenades. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Additionally, all BM59 rifles would be equipped from the factory with a muzzle device called “<em>Tri-Compensatore</em>” (“tri-compensator”), which dubbed as a flash hider, muzzle brake, and rifle grenade launcher. Much like many other NATO armies at that time, the Italian military made extensive use of rifle grenades, particularly the 75mm Energa manufactured in Belgium by MECAR and known in the U.S. service as the M28 rifle grenade; the BM59 would, thus, also come equipped with a flip-up grenade leaf sight (“<em>Alidada</em>” in Italian) which, when raised, would also act as a cut-off valve, preventing any gas from reaching the piston.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="300" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22-1024x300.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45053" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22-1024x300.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22-300x88.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22-768x225.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22-750x220.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22-1140x334.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-22.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The BM59 and its variants came with a gas cutout valve that could be flipped up when using rifle grenades and dubbed as a grenade leaf sight; the sight could be marked for 50, 75, or 100 meters, or for 75, 100, or 120 meters, depending on whether it was calibrated from factory for MECAR 75mm Energa or Super-Energa grenades (Pierangelo Tendas)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The grenade sight was pre-set for target at 50, 75, and 100 meters, and marked specifically “Energa” at the bottom. The grenade sight and bipod were all in one assembly with the gas valve and front sight tower; when the Energa grenade was phased out in favor of the improved-capability Super Energa, the leaf sights were replaced with new ones, which were pre-sighted to 75-, 100-, and 120-meter increments.</p>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-4e76a59" data-block-id="4e76a59"><div class="stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-4e76a59-column">
<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-a09cfa0" data-v="4" data-block-id="a09cfa0"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-a09cfa0-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-a09cfa0-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="679" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-09-679x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45051" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-09-679x1024.jpg 679w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-09-199x300.jpg 199w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-09-768x1158.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-09-750x1131.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-09.jpg 796w" sizes="(max-width: 679px) 100vw, 679px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Beretta BM59 feeds through a nose-in, rock-back double-stack, single-feed metal magazine holding 20 rounds of 7.62×51mm NATO ammunition. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-419a00c" data-v="4" data-block-id="419a00c"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-419a00c-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-419a00c-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1012" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-1024x1012.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45052" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-1024x1012.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-300x297.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-768x759.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-75x75.jpg 75w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-750x741.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10-1140x1127.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-10.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A close-up of the BM59’s magazine release paddle. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>
</div></div>



<p>Being based on the Garand action, the BM59 featured a charging handle on the right side of the receiver, a hold-open button to the left, and the same type of front and adjustable rear sight used on the U.S. M1 rifle. The front-in, rock-back magazine was held in place by a paddle catch to the rear of the magwell; the safety was located in front of the trigger guard, and consisted of a flat plate that could be pushed in and out with the shooter’s index finger. The safety plate was perforated, so that BM59 rifles could be secured with a chain or a metal rod when held on a rack – once again just like the Garand.</p>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-74fd519" data-block-id="74fd519"><div class="stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-74fd519-column">
<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-3e16fe2" data-v="4" data-block-id="3e16fe2"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-3e16fe2-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-3e16fe2-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="679" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11-1024x679.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45054" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11-1024x679.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11-768x509.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11-750x498.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11-1140x756.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-11.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The manual safety of the BM59 is located in front of the trigger guard, and is perforated so that a metal rod, a piece of chain, or a padlock could be inserted into it to secure the rifles when in their storage racks. (Matteo Brogi)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-f5115fe" data-v="4" data-block-id="f5115fe"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-f5115fe-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-f5115fe-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="749" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19-1024x749.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45057" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19-1024x749.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19-300x220.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19-768x562.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19-750x549.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19-1140x834.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-19.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Beretta BM59 came from the factory with a folding winter trigger to be used with mittens. (Beretta)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>
</div></div>



<p>Additionally, the BM59 also featured a winter trigger in form of an up-folding lever that would normally lay flat against the bottom of the action, to the right of the trigger guard. When necessary, it could be folded down to allow the BM59 to be fired with mittens or heavy gloves.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">THREE SUITS FOR THE SAME RIFLE</h2>



<p>The Beretta BM59 rifle would be manufactured in three main variants, the most commonly available being the BM59 ITAL, known by the Italian military simply as the FAL, standing for “<em>Fucile automatico leggero</em>” (“Light automatic rifle”). The BM59 ITAL was the baseline model with a standard fixed stock, which hosted a cleaning and maintenance tool behind a trapdoor in the buttplate. An export version, known as the BM59 Mk.1, came without the distinctive “tri-compensator” device on the muzzle.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="507" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05-1024x507.jpeg" alt="" class="wp-image-45048" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05-1024x507.jpeg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05-300x149.jpeg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05-768x380.jpeg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05-750x371.jpeg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05-1140x564.jpeg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-05.jpeg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The BM59 “ITAL TA”, with its folding stock, and Mk.4, also known as the “Nigerian model.” The earlier would be adopted by the Italian Armed Forces in two variants, including a Paratrooper’s model with a detachable muzzle device; the latter would only find limited export success. (Morphy Auctions)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The second variant – less common in Italian arsenals, but by far the most popular among troops due to its lower weight and easier maneuverability – was the ITAL-TA, with TA standing for “<em>Truppe Alpine</em>” (“Alpine troops”), initially conceived for the Italian Army’s mountain regiments. The ITAL-TA variant came from factory with a vertical brown plastic pistol grip and a side-folding two-strut metal stock; a variant of the ITAL-TA, known in Italy as the ITAL-Para (from “<em>Paracadutisti</em>”) and marketed internationally as the Mk.3, came with a removable tri-compensator device, turning it into an even more compact package to be secured to a paratrooper’s harness before launch.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-medium"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="201" height="300" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-25-201x300.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45061" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-25-201x300.jpg 201w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-25-686x1024.jpg 686w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-25-768x1146.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-25-750x1119.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-25.jpg 804w" sizes="(max-width: 201px) 100vw, 201px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Italian paratroopers with Beretta BM59 ITAL-Para rifles strapped to their harnesses: with the stock folded and muzzle device removed, the ITAL-Para was extremely compact. (Jean-Pierre Husson)</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Finally, two squad automatic weapon variants were proposed, dubbed the Mk.2 and Mk.4 respectively, with the Mk.2 featuring a full wooden stock and the Mk.4 coming with a brown polymer pistol grip. Both were essentially a baseline BM59 ITAL rifle with a fixed stock and vertical pistol grip, not unlike what the U.S. had experimented with in the M14E2/M14A1 – and not unlike it, the Mk.2 and Mk.4 were lackluster in their intended function due to the limitations of the 20-round magazine. The Italian military never adopted the BM59 Mk.2 and Mk.4; export sales were however made to Indonesia and Nigeria, which later proceeded to manufacture them under license respectively as the SP.3 rifle at the Bandung Weapons Factory (now known as PT Pindad), and as the NR-2 rifle at the Kaduna plant (now known as the Defense Industries Corporation of Nigeria, or DICON), which is why this last pattern is known chiefly as the “Nigerian type.”</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft size-medium"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="240" height="300" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-20-240x300.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45047" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-20-240x300.jpg 240w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-20-817x1024.jpg 817w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-20-768x962.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-20-750x939.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-20.jpg 958w" sizes="(max-width: 240px) 100vw, 240px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The action of the Beretta BM59 came with a stripper clip guide that made it possible to reload the magazine without removing it. (Beretta)</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Perhaps not surprisingly, the BM59 was never adapted or modified for sniper or designated marksman purposes. Being based on an unmodified M1 Garand action, the BM59 ejected spent cases from the top, which meant that it could be reloaded by topping off the magazine with 10-round stripper clips (and, indeed, all BM59 rifles came with a dedicated clip guide), but also that it could only be equipped with a side-mounted scope, much like the M1D Garand. By the 1960s, when the BM59 rifle was introduced in Italian service, this was already an outdated solution; while some pictures do exist of Italian Army paratroopers using side-mounted optics on their BM59 rifles, this was by no means a widely adopted solution, but rather a limited-scale concoction by the most elite frontline units of the Italian military to overcome the limitations of their service rifles.</p>



<p>For the same reason, and unlike the M14, no attempt to turn existing BM59s into DMRs was made after the Italian military switched to 5.56×45mm NATO. Other weapon systems had been adopted to fulfill that niche by that point, and now that the AR-70/90 has been phased out in favor of the ARX-160 and ARX-200, the problem can be officially considered as solved.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">THE LAST OF ITS KIND</h2>



<p>The Beretta BM59 rifle would go on to serve with the Italian military officially until 1990, being retained as a rear-line and reserve rifle for a few more years afterward, as its replacement with the new AR-70/90 5.56mm weapon system was gradual. This makes the BM59 arguably the longest-serving battle rifle having been based on a classic, pre-WWII stock and action design.</p>



<p>As of today, with the Beretta ARX-160 and ARX-200 being universally in service with the Italian military, and with tens of thousands of AR-70/90 rifles in reserve – so many, indeed, that upon their replacement, the Italian government donated many of them to Albania to facilitate the latter’s transition to NATO standards – the BM59 doesn’t fulfill any operational role in its motherland any longer, and like the M1 Garand, M1 Carbine, MAB sub-machine guns, and Carcano rifles, it is confined to ceremonial duties.</p>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-columns stk-block-columns stk-block stk-ad93814" data-block-id="ad93814"><div class="stk-row stk-inner-blocks stk-block-content stk-content-align stk-ad93814-column">
<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-65f7e27" data-v="4" data-block-id="65f7e27"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-65f7e27-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-65f7e27-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="674" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-23-674x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45058" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-23-674x1024.jpg 674w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-23-198x300.jpg 198w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-23-768x1167.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-23-750x1139.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-23.jpg 790w" sizes="(max-width: 674px) 100vw, 674px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Italian Bersagliere with Beretta BM59 ITAL battle rifle. (Jean-Pierre Husson)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>



<div class="wp-block-stackable-column stk-block-column stk-column stk-block stk-53ffab2" data-v="4" data-block-id="53ffab2"><div class="stk-column-wrapper stk-block-column__content stk-container stk-53ffab2-container stk--no-background stk--no-padding"><div class="stk-block-content stk-inner-blocks stk-53ffab2-inner-blocks">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="678" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-24-678x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45059" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-24-678x1024.jpg 678w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-24-199x300.jpg 199w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-24-768x1161.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-24-750x1134.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-24.jpg 794w" sizes="(max-width: 678px) 100vw, 678px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Italian alpine trooper with Beretta BM59 ITAL-TA folding stock battle rifle, equipped with bayonet. (Jean-Pierre Husson)</figcaption></figure>
</div></div></div>
</div></div>



<p>The BM59 also saw distribution on the civilian markets, both in Italy and abroad. In the 1960s, Beretta manufactured very small quantities – approximately 1,700 samples overall – of the BM62 semi-automatic rifle; chambered in 308 Winchester, it came from factory with a five-round magazine and lacked the “tri-compensator” and flip-up grenade sight/gas cutout.</p>



<p>As laws concerning modern sporting rifles relaxed in Italy, and with the country having nothing similar to the “<em>once a machine-gun, always a machine-gun</em>” rule that is in place in the U.S., the Nuova Jäger S.r.l. company would first launch a rifle called the M99 – essentially a Beretta BM62 assembled using old BM59 components – only to flood the Italian civilian market with a huge quantity of proper BM59 rifles from dismissed Italian military stocks, properly refurbished and converted to semi-automatic only. In the following years, other companies, such as Redolfi Armi, did the same. After so many years, the BM59 is no longer an impossible dream for European shooters.</p>



<p>At the same time, Nuova Jäger introduced a line of dedicated accessories for the BM59, including a specific Picatinny scope mount. A similar product is offered by Sadlak Industries in the U.S., providing plenty of clearance for the top-ejecting action while no longer requiring a scope to be side-mounted. Too late to allow the Italian military to convert their BM59s to designated marksman rifles, but welcome news for shooters in Italy and elsewhere that wants to get the best out of their rifle.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="261" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26-1024x261.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45060" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26-1024x261.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26-300x77.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26-768x196.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26-750x191.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26-1140x291.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Beretta-BM59-26.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The BM62 was Beretta’s factory semi-automatic version of the BM59, lacking the gas cutout, grenade sight, and grenade launching muzzle device. An exceedingly rare rifle, less than 2,000 were manufactured, the BM62 has today been overshadowed on the Italian civilian market by a vast number of original BM59s converted to semi-automatic only after having been dismissed by the Italian military. (Rock Island Auction Company)</figcaption></figure>



<p>As far as American shooters are concerned, BM62 rifles are way more rare and collectable in the U.S. than they are in Europe. BERBEN (the first ever U.S.-based Beretta subsidiary) imported but a few in the 1980s; around the same time, Springfield Armory sold their own BM59-based semi-automatic rifles, assembling them in the U.S. with a mix of locally made and imported parts. Today, for American collectors, the best way to get their hands on a BM59 are the James River Armory build, and parts kits.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><strong>TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Manufacturer</td><td>Fabbrica d’Armi Pietro Beretta S.p.A., Gardone Val Trompia (BS) – Italy</td></tr><tr><td>Model</td><td>BM59</td></tr><tr><td>Type</td><td>Automatic rifle</td></tr><tr><td>Caliber</td><td>7.62×51mm NATO</td></tr><tr><td>Action</td><td>Select-fire, gas-operated</td></tr><tr><td>Safety</td><td>Manual, located inside trigger guard</td></tr><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 rounds</td></tr><tr><td>Rate of fire</td><td>750 rounds per minute (approx.)</td></tr><tr><td>Sight systems</td><td>Fixed front, adjustable rear</td></tr><tr><td>Barrel length</td><td>• 19.32 in. (BM59 ITAL, BM59 ITAL-TA)<br>• 18.41 in. (BM59 ITAL-Para)<br>• 20.85 in. (BM59 Mk.2, BM59 Mk.4)<br> &nbsp; <br>All 4 grooves, RH, 1 turn in 11.96”</td></tr><tr><td>Total length</td><td>• 43.11 in. (BM59 ITAL, <br>• 43.70 in. (BM59 ITAL-TA and ITAL-Para, stock unfolded) <br>• 33.66 in. (BM59 ITAL-TA, stock folded) <br>• 28.54 in. (BM59 ITAL-Para, stock folded, muzzle device removed) <br>• 44.48 in. (BM59 Mk.2, BM59 Mk.4)</td></tr><tr><td>Weight (empty)</td><td>• 9.70 lb. (BM59 ITAL) <br>• 9.80 lb. (BM59 ITAL-TA) <br>• 10.6 lb. (BM59 ITAL-Para) <br>• 12.08 lb. (BM59 Mk.2)</td></tr><tr><td>Materials</td><td>Steel, wood, polymer</td></tr><tr><td>Finishes</td><td>Matte black on all surfaces</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. SERVICE WEAPONS USING .30-06</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/u-s-service-weapons-using-30-06/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1 (Oct 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benet-Mercie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Ordnance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Swebilius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chauchat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Model 1895]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Vickers M1915]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranston Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN-D BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Hammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henri Mercie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotchkiss Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotchkiss Portative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isaac Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Browning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krag-Jorgensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Benet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1905]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1917A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919A6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlin Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Model 1889]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Model 1900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin M Johnson Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meuse-Argonne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model of 1914]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model of 1917]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Westinghouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pattern 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potato Digger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert G. Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sac-Lowell Shops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Maxim Model of 1904]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vickers Sons & Maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner & Swasey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert G. Segel, Frank Iannamico &#38; Dan Shea U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903 The U.S. M1903 Rifle was designed and adopted to replace the Krag-Jorgensen rifle and its .30-40 cartridge. Adopted on June 19, 1903, the M1903 Rifle was chambered for the Model of 1903, .30 Government Cartridge (.30-03), which had a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Robert G. Segel, Frank Iannamico &amp; Dan Shea</strong></em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="190" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11575" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104-300x81.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104-600x163.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. M1903 Rifle was designed and adopted to replace the Krag-Jorgensen rifle and its .30-40 cartridge. Adopted on June 19, 1903, the M1903 Rifle was chambered for the Model of 1903, .30 Government Cartridge (.30-03), which had a 220-grain round-nose projectile. The Model of 1903 Rifle was only in service a short period of time before some changes were made. One of the most prominent upgrades was the rechambering for the improved Model of 1906 cartridge, which had a lighter, spitzer-type projectile and an improved powder. A newly designed M1905 rear sight was also added. The rifles were manufactured by Springfield Armory and Rock Island Arsenal from 1903 until 1914. Production was quickly resumed during 1917 with the U.S. entry into World War I.</p>



<p>The M1903 Rifle in .30-06 caliber remained the standard service weapon of the U.S. until the adoption of the M1 Rifle in 1936. During World War II, production of the M1 Garand was not able to keep up with the wartime demand. Thus, Remington Arms was awarded a contract to resume manufacture of the M1903 Rifle. During production, there were many new features implemented into the original design of the ’03 rifle to speed up production. These rifles were designated as the M1903 (Modified). Subsequently, more improvements were made resulting in the M1903-A3 model, which was adopted on May 21, 1942. The 03-A3 had many stamped parts, a new receiver mounted aperture rear sight and a longer hand guard. The L.C. Smith &amp; Corona Company was awarded a contract in February of 1942 to supplement production. The M1903 and its variants remained in service until declared obsolete on July 24, 1947.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="677" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11576" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147-300x290.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147-600x580.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. Maxim Model of 1904 was the first rifle caliber heavy machine gun approved for use as the standard service type by the U.S. Army in 1904. The Army was interested in the Maxim as early as 1887 and procured examples of the “World Standard” Maxim Model 1889 and Model 1900 for evaluation. After sporadic testing, the Chief of Ordnance finally gave approval for adoption in 1904. The first order for 50 guns and tripods were manufactured by Vickers, Sons &amp; Maxim (VSM) in England in the U.S. caliber .30-03.</p>



<p>The Ordnance Department wanted the gun to be made in the United States and enlisted Colt to manufacture the gun. Problems arose and it was several years before Colt could begin production. In the meantime, another forty guns were ordered from VSM. Colt finally began production in 1908. By 1908, the service cartridge had changed from the .30-03 to the .30-06. The ninety guns produced by VSM were all converted to the new service cartridge while all the Colt guns were manufactured in .30-06. Colt produced 197 guns, and with VSM’s 90 guns, total production of the Model of 1904 was 287 guns. Colt never produced any tripods. All the tripods were made by VSM and wheeled carriage mounts were produced by Rock Island Arsenal.</p>



<p>The Model of 1904 saw a brief service life, quickly being declared obsolete by 1915, yet was widely used and saw service in such distant outposts as the Philippines, Hawaii, Mexico, Central and South America. The gun never saw active combat service, particularly in World War I, being relegated to training purposes.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="311" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11578" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139-300x133.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139-600x267.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</strong></p>



<p>The Automatic Machine Rifle Model of 1909 is commonly referred to in the U.S. as the “Benet-Mercie.” Laurence Benet was an American engineer who worked for the Hotchkiss Company in Paris, France. He, along with another Hotchkiss engineer named Henri Mercie, collaborated to develop an air cooled, gas operated, lightweight machine gun based on the Hotchkiss Model 1900 heavy machine gun design. The Model 1909 differed from heavy machine guns in that it weighed just 30 pounds and was fitted with a wooden stock with elevation gear and a bipod. It was mechanically modified as to how the breech closed and the feedway and feed mechanism were changed. The gun also had a barrel changing ability, unique at that time. The number of parts to the gun were reduced to just twenty five.</p>



<p>The French adopted the French made Hotchkiss gun in 8mm Lebel and the British adopted it in .303. in 1909 and was known on the Continent as the “Hotchkiss Portative.” That same year, the U.S. Army, after lengthy trials, adopted it as service issue as the Automatic Machine Rifle Model of 1909 and ordered 29 guns from Hotchkiss. The Ordnance Department wanted the gun to be made in the U.S. The rights were secured and Colt and the Springfield Armory were contracted to produce the American version in .30-06. Over the next several years, both manufacturers combined produced approximately 670 guns. The Model of 1909 was issued for service with the Model of 1908 Warner &amp; Swasey telescopic musket sight, originally used for sharpshooter use with the Model 1903 Springfield rifle.</p>



<p>The Model of 1909 was issued to U.S. infantry and cavalry troops from 1909 to 1918 and saw limited tactical use in the landing at Vera Cruz in 1913, all along the Mexican border in 1916 and was used in the defense of Columbus, New Mexico against the sneak attack by Poncho Villa in 1916. Though the British and French “Hotchkiss Portative” version was widely used in World War I, the U.S. “Benet-Mercie” was relegated to training use. It was declared obsolete in 1918 and ultimately replaced by the far superior M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="568" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11581" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125-300x243.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125-600x487.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Model 1914 Colt Automatic Gun</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Model 1914 Colt Automatic Gun</strong></p>



<p>Invented and designed by John Browning, the Colt Model 1895 Automatic gun was the world’s first practical gas-actuated machine gun. Using a gas-impingement system that operated against a lever that traveled downward and backward in a 170-degree arc underneath the gun, it affectionately became known as “The Potato Digger.” Colt manufactured the gun and was extremely successful in selling the gun world wide in a variety of calibers. The U.S. Navy purchased fifty guns in 1897 in 6mm Lee and another 150 guns in 1898. These guns were used as secondary armament on ships and with naval landing parties and with the U.S. Marines. The gun was also used with some degree of success in the Philippines, the Boxer Rebellion, Mexican border war and the Spanish-American War.</p>



<p>The U.S. Army ordered 100 guns for testing and training in .30-40 Krag. Upon the recommendation of a joint Army-Navy board of 1898 for standardizing arms and ammunition, the Navy rechambered their 6mm Lee to .30-40 Krag, and then they all were changed to .30-03 and ultimately to .30-06. Though the Army, Navy and Marines all used the Colt Model 1895; only the Navy officially adopted the weapon. The Army just continued to buy it commercially as they deemed necessary eventually buying 2,800 guns during World War I. The “Model” designation was a name used by Colt and did not represent acceptance as issue by the Army.</p>



<p>In 1914, Colt modified the Model of 1895 by replacing the heavy, thick permanent barrel with a finned barrel that was easily changeable and became the Model of 1914. It was this version and its variants that ultimately saw use in World War I by a number of Allied nations though relegated as secondary armament and training by the U.S. The gun was used with three types of tripods, basically differing only in height.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="636" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11582" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103-300x273.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103-600x545.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. began to realize how vastly under-armed in automatic weapons it was and started a new series of tests in 1913 and field trials in 1914. The new, improved version of the Maxim gun, now called the Vickers, was the clear winner. The new British Vickers was redesigned internally to maximize space within the receiver box by inverting the toggle joint and lock, and the overall weight of the gun was substantially reduced; all without sacrificing reliability. In 1915, the Board of Ordnance unanimously approved the type for the Army as the Model of 1915 chambered for the .30-06 cartridge. They immediately placed an order for 125 guns to be made by Colt and in 1916 placed an additional order for 4,000 even though the first order had not yet even been made. When the U.S. entered World War I in April, 1917, not a single Colt Vickers M1915 had been delivered due to production problems at Colt.</p>



<p>Colt made Vickers guns finally became available in late 1917. By mid 1918, Colt Vickers started to be shipped overseas. The first twelve divisions arriving in France were issued the French Hotchkiss Model of 1914. The next ten divisions that sailed for France in May and June of 1918 were equipped with the Colt Vickers. By August, 1918, thirteen divisions were using the Colt Vickers. In all, 12,125 Vickers Model of 1915 ground guns were produced by Colt.</p>



<p>At the end of World War I, the remaining inventory of Colt Vickers were put into storage and held in reserve. They were ultimately sent to Great Britain under Lend-Lease to help guard against German invasion during World War II, especially after the huge losses of equipment at Dunkirk, while British production fought to rearm the British Army. After World War II, the U.S. did not want the guns returned and the British destroyed the remaining inventory.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11583" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>John Browning continued to experiment with different machine gun designs after the introduction of his first machine gun, the Model of 1895 Automatic Gun. He developed a short-recoil, water-cooled gun in 1900 and patented it in 1901. There was no government interest in this prototype and he ceased work on it until 1910 when he made further modifications and improvements to it. Again, there was no governmental interest in the gun.</p>



<p>As the U.S. was being drawn into World War I, the Ordnance Board urgently requested designs for new machine guns. Browning took his heavy water-cooled machine gun along with his new Browning Automatic Rifle to be tested in February, 1917. Both guns tested exceptionally well and the BAR was ordered immediately. As war broke out, another official test occurred in May, 1917. The genius of John Browning shone through with the simplicity of design, reliability and ease of maintenance. Browning’s heavy machine gun was adopted as the Model of 1917 chambered for the .30-06 service cartridge and ordered into production with contracts being awarded to New England Westinghouse, Remington and Colt.</p>



<p>30,089 M1917 Brownings were sent to France before the war ended with 1,168 guns actually being used in the front lines. The first instance of combat usage was in September, 1918 in the battle of the Meuse-Argonne, where, in wet and muddy conditions, the new Browning guns performed exceptionally well with one company firing 10,000 rounds per gun.</p>



<p>The Browning M1917 was to replace the variety of machine guns in American use (British Mk I Vickers, U.S. Vickers Model of 1915 and French Hotchkiss Model of 1914) but the war ended two months later so the Browning actually saw limited use. Yet, Browning’s design was so brilliant that the M1917 and its subsequent variants soldiered on in the U.S. inventory for another fifty years.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="370" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11584" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54-600x317.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>Colonel Isaac Lewis began development of the Lewis gun in 1910 based upon a previous design by Samuel McClean. Lewis presented his gun for formal testing in 1912 to the Ordnance Board, which included a “stunt” by firing the gun from an airplane &#8211; the first time a machine gun had ever been fired from an aircraft. The Ordnance Board took a dim view of the “stunt” and during the rest of the trials took particular efforts to find fault with the gun and rejected it claiming it was no better than the already approved Model of 1909 Benet-Mercie.</p>



<p>Lewis then went to Europe where his gun was warmly received and went into production in 1913 at Armes Automatiques Lewis in Liege, Belgium and at the Birmingham Small Arms (BSA) Company in Birmingham, England. Belgium was soon overrun by Germany in 1914 and production continued at BSA who eventually produced 145, 397 Lewis guns during World War I in the British .303 caliber. The gun was widely used to great effect throughout the war.</p>



<p>Savage Arms Company of Utica, New York began producing Lewis guns for a Canadian contract in .303 and the U.S. Army procured 350 guns (in .303) for use in 1916 along the Mexican border. Nevertheless, the U.S. Army still harbored a grudge against Lewis and his gun that dated back to 1912. The U.S. Navy, however, held no such animosity and purchased 6,000 Lewis guns from Savage for the U.S. Marines chambered in .30-06 and it was designated as the Model of 1917. Upon arriving in France, the 5th Regiment of the Marines attached to the 2nd Division, who had been issued and trained with the Model of 1917, had their Lewis guns taken away and were issued the French Hotchkiss M1914 and Chauchat M1915 machine guns. The American .30-06 Lewis guns were turned over to the Aviation Services. The Army in due course purchased 2,500 M1917 Lewis guns but they relegated them to U.S. training. U.S. Model of 1917 Lewis guns saw little or no infantry combat during the war. After the war, the Army discarded the Lewis gun though the Navy and Marine Corps kept it in their inventory until the 1930s.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="217" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11587" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43-300x93.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43-600x186.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Marlin Machine Gun Model of 1917/1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Marlin Machine Gun Model of 1917/18</strong></p>



<p>As World War I heated up, orders for the Colt M1914 increased as well. Colt entered into an agreement with Marlin Arms Company on manufacturing the M1914. Marlin’s designer, Carl Swebilius, worked out an improvement to the operating system that changed Browning’s original “Gas Hammer” style lever action to a straight piston arrangement. The Marlin guns, with the exception of a small run of M1917 trainers, were no longer “Diggers,” the piston in tube arrangement ran along the bottom of the barrel and applied the energy to the bolt system.</p>



<p>This change made Browning’s system easier to adapt into aircraft and vehicles; thus, the M1917 and M1918 Marlin Aircraft Machine Gun designations, and the M1917 Marlin Tank Machine Gun designation. Unfortunately, changing to a straight line piston changed the impulse time and energy, and the early guns had trouble in extraction tearing case rims. Adjustments were made to the design, but not before negative publicity occurred. Marlin had taken the position that the ammunition the Army had did not have strong enough cases and the Army said that the Marlin guns had to work with ammunition that was fielded. In the end, the Marlin M1917 type guns were relegated to aircraft use where there was more control on ammunition quality. Some of the Marlin guns had aluminum radiators on the barrels similar to the Lewis M1917, but most had a bare barrel.</p>



<p>The Marlin M1917 and M1918 machine guns did see combat in U.S. use. During World War II, may were shipped to England for their naval defense.</p>



<p>There were an additional 2,816 of the Marlin Model 1917 that are virtually identical to the Model of 1914 “Potato Digger” made by Colt. These were for training in the U.S. Army, and the main difference was in the location of the belt feed opening.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="184" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11588" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29-300x79.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29-600x158.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>The U.S M1917 rifle was originally produced as the Pattern 14, .303 caliber “Enfield” for the British. Prior to the U.S. entry into World War I, the British negotiated several contracts with the U.S. firms of Remington, Winchester and Eddystone (a Remington subsidiary), to produce the P14. Collectively, 1.2 million of the Pattern 14 rifles were made from 1916 to 1917.</p>



<p>Upon the United States’ entry into World War I, the U.S. Army faced a service rifle shortage. With the British contracts completed, instead of having the companies retool for the M1903 rifle, the War Department decided to make a few design changes and rechamber the P14 to the U.S. M1906 rimless .30-06 round and the new rifle was ready for production. The U.S. M1917 rifle was officially adopted in April 1917. There were over 2.4 million manufactured from 1917 to 1919 at a cost of $26.00 per weapon.</p>



<p>When World War I ended, the M1917 rifles were prudently placed into storage, after having been rebuilt by various U.S. arsenals. When World War II broke out in Europe, the U.S. and her Allies again faced critical shortages of small arms. The M1917 rifles were pulled from storage and issued to rear echelon soldiers and for training. After the war in October, 1945, the U.S. Army declared the M1917 rifle obsolete. While the U.S. M1917 rifle was more utilitarian then glamorous, it did everything it was intended to do.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="212" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11589" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21-300x91.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21-600x182.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong></p>



<p>As the U.S. was being drawn into the First World War, the Ordnance Board met in May, 1917 to consider for adoption designs for light machine guns and automatic rifles. John Browning had been previously working on a gas-operated, magazine fed, true automatic rifle design and submitted it to the board. It was unanimously accepted by the Ordnance Board and requested that production begin immediately at Colt who had secured the rights. However, Colt was already at peak production and requested approval from the Board for delay in production while they built a new facility in Meriden, Connecticut. Due to the immediate need, the request was denied and the lead manufacturer became the Winchester Company.</p>



<p>The initial contract with Winchester called for 25,000 BARs. They were in full production by June, 1918 delivering 4,000 guns and in July were turning out 9,000 BARs. Colt and Marlin-Rockwell also began production shortly after Winchester got into full production.</p>



<p>By July of 1918, the BAR began to arrive in France and the first unit to receive them was the U.S. Army’s 79th Division and they immediately exchanged their woefully inadequate French M1915 Chauchat machine rifles with the new BAR and began training. In the September 1918 battle of the Meuse-Argonne, the BAR was used extensively. World War I only lasted another two months before ending in November, 1918. Thus, while the BAR was the state-of the-art weapon, it saw limited combat service. Nevertheless, the M1918 BAR was such a fine weapon that it remained as the standard U.S. service automatic rifle after the war and production continued after the war. Of the total 102,125 M1918 BARs produced, Winchester made 47,123, Marlin-Rockwell 39,002 and Colt 16,000.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="324" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11593" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18-300x139.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18-600x278.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. was ill-equipped when it entered World War I in 1917 and was particularly lacking in automatic weapons. With less than 1,100 automatic weapons in inventory, consisting of four types in two different calibers, these guns were needed in the U.S. for training the new army. When U.S. divisions arrived in France, they had no automatic weapons.</p>



<p>The French, at war since 1914, had an arms industry in full force. Thus, U.S. troops in eighteen divisions were issued the French Model 1914 Hotchkiss heavy machine gun and the Model 1915 Chauchat automatic rifle: both chambered in 8mm Lebel. The French quickly developed the Chauchat to fill the immediate wartime need of France and consisted of fabricated steel tubing of standard sizes and stampings. The only parts requiring extensive machining were the barrel and bolt. The long-recoil operation, cheap materials, unorthodox enclosed design and hurried production produced a gun that had poor reliability and worse accuracy. But, it was all that was available.</p>



<p>To help alleviate a two-cartridge supply nightmare, the U.S. asked the French manufacturer, C.S.R.G., to produce the gun in .30-06. Good idea, bad execution. The gun was simple in its design and conversion was easy: change the barrel, replace the semicircular magazine with a detachable box magazine, change the angle of the bipod and change the graduations on the rear sight. However, the already poor reliability of the gun went from bad to worse.</p>



<p>The more powerful, straight cased, rimless .30-06 cartridge was very difficult to extract. With its violent action, the M1918 Chauchat tore the cartridges instead of extracting them and the more powerful .30-06 caused major stress on all the working parts causing failures. Additionally, the gun heated up very quickly causing the action to freeze until it had cooled. Due to the enclosed design, clearing stoppages and jams was almost impossible. The gun, in a single word, was awful.</p>



<p>The U.S. nevertheless quickly adopted it as the Chauchat Model of 1918 and bought and paid for 25,000; taking delivery of 19,241. There is no record of M1918s being used in combat and were relegated to training use. They were so bad, that immediately after the war, the U.S. ordered them to be destroyed.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="654" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11594" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13-300x280.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13-600x561.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</strong></p>



<p>In the rush to supply American troops in World War I, deficiencies in design and manufacturing methods of the Model of 1917 manifested itself quickly in operational use. Many of the problems stemmed from the lack of, or improper heat treating of, key internal parts that included the bolt, barrel extension, accelerator, firing pin, trigger and extractor. Inaccurate manufacturing tolerances also contributed to leaking water jackets at the muzzle cap. The most severe problem was due to the pounding of the breech lock on the breech lock cam causing cracks in the receiver side and bottom plates.</p>



<p>As early as 1919, steps were taken to remedy these problems; the most obvious being welding or riveting a “U” stirrup under the bottom plate and extending up each side of the receiver to strengthen the receiver box. A program was initiated by Rock Island Arsenal in 1936 to covert all Model of 1917 guns with upgrades. Changes included a large, new-manufactured reinforced bottom plate that extended up the sides of the receiver and riveted in place, a new belt feed lever, an improved top cover latch that also incorporated a hold open feature and a new rear sight graduated in yards for the M1 ball cartridge (original Model of 1917 sights were in meters). This improved version of the Model of 1917 was designated as the M1917A1. (The “Model of” designation for U.S. arms was dropped in 1939 and replaced with the letter “M”.)</p>



<p>During World War II, more changes occurred to the M1917A1 that included an improved bolt, the bronze end cap and trunnion replaced by steel, the steam tube assembly was strengthened and the rear leaf sight graduated for the now standard M2 ball cartridge. While almost all Model of 1917s were ultimately converted to the A1 specifications, production resumed from 1936 to 1945 with 55,859 M1917A1s being produced by Rock Island Arsenal.</p>



<p>The M1917A1 was used extensively in both theaters of operation during World War II and continued service throughout the Korean War and the beginning stages of Vietnam.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="263" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11595" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10-300x113.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10-600x225.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</strong></p>



<p>During the interwar period, many attempts were made to improve on the M1918 BAR. The M1918A1 and the M1922 were made in very small quantity, with the basic addition of a bipod being the most obvious change. In 1938-39, serious work was begun on what became the Browning Automatic Rifle, Model of 1918A2. The initial experiments with the bipod were expanded upon, and the bipod placement was moved to the front of the barrel utilizing a new flash hider to secure it. The bipod allowed full rotation of the barrel, which made up somewhat for the loss of traverse due to the forward location.</p>



<p>A second addition was that of a pistol grip which extends slightly below the trigger. The method of firing was changed from select fire, (semiautomatic and fully automatic) in the Model of 1918, to dual rate of fire in the Model of 1918A2. This rate reducing mechanism was initially based on the Belgian FN-D BAR trigger group but was later adapted to a US design. Magazine guides were also added to the front of the trigger guard. The fore end was shortened and a heat shield was added, all to help the cooling process. There was a hinged buttplate to add support from the operator’s shoulder, and the new buttstock design allowed for a monopod stock rest.</p>



<p>Production of the M1918A2 was initially performed by upgrading M1918 and M1918A1 BARs. M1918A2 new manufacturing was started in January of 1943. The M1918A2 BAR served in the US military forces throughout World War II, Korea, and well into the Vietnam War. M1918A2s are still seen in various inventories around the world, obsolete though they are.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="275" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11596" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10-300x118.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10-600x236.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</strong></p>



<p>The success of John Browning’s designs is evident in the proliferation of Browning machine guns used by U.S. and other forces around the world. The end of World War I and the advent of more mobile military forces led firearms designers to confront new problems of portability, and the use of tanks and aircraft compounded this. Browning’s basic design for the M1917 series had morphed from water-cooled to air-cooled as early as 1918, and the first models of 1919 Browning machine guns were basically for aircraft use.</p>



<p>The most prolific of the air-cooled Browning machine guns in rifle caliber was the M1919A4. This final variant was designed as either a flexible mount unit for tank use, or for mounting on the M2 tripod with traverse &amp; elevation mechanism and pintle. Production began with the adoption of the M1919A4 in 1935. At that time, all M1919A2 and other earlier variants were started onto a rebuild program to have the longer 24 inch heavy barrel as well as other modifications. By 1939 the elongated slots in the barrel jacket were changed to the quickly recognizable pattern of 5/8 inch diameter holes.</p>



<p>The M1919A4 served well into the Vietnam War for U.S. forces and is still in use today in various armies around the world, primarily in South and Central America and Africa, although most have been replaced with more modern weapons. The M1919A4 was fielded in .30-06, but it has been issued to various armies in 8mm Mauser, 7.62&#215;51 NATO, 7.65 Argentine, and others.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="234" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11597" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10-300x100.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10-600x201.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</strong></p>



<p>The Browning M1919A6 was conceived as a stop-gap measure to fill a void between the M1919A4 and the BAR. The BAR, while relatively light and portable, did not have the capability of sustained firepower. The M1919A4, while perfectly adequate, lacked the ability to be quickly set up and employed and still required the use of a tripod for stability.</p>



<p>The Infantry Board in 1942 investigated many light machine guns of the time, including the German MG42. While a number of designs were submitted, wartime shortages, production constraints and immediate need precluded the design and production of a superior weapon versus modifying a current production weapon to fill the need. (A bird in hand is better than two in the bush.) Reminiscent of Germany’s decision in World War I to develop a light machine gun from an already existing production gun (the MG08/15 from the MG08), the Infantry Board decided to make modifications to the Browning M1919A4 machine gun.</p>



<p>Beginning in 1943, the gun was standardized as the M1919A6 and featured a removable shoulder stock, a lighter barrel with a different barrel bushing to accommodate a bipod and was fitted with a carrying handle. The gun weighed 12.5 pounds lighter than the M1919A4 mounted on its M2 tripod, and was easily transportable and set up by one man. Other than these relatively minor modifications, the gun was mechanically identical to the M1919A4.</p>



<p>Production of the M1919A6 was by the Saginaw Steering Gear Division of General Motors, who produced 43,479 M1919A6s. A number of M1919A4s were also converted to the M1919A6 configuration. The gun saw wide service in the last two years of World War II and continued to see service through the Korean War and the early years of Vietnam.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="200" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11598" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6-300x86.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6-600x171.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</strong></p>



<p>Development of the M1 rifle began in 1919. Limited funds and the conflicting ideas of many of those involved caused the program to drag on until 1936, when a suitable prototype finally emerged. Original prototype rifles were chambered for a .276 caliber cartridge. However, the weapons were soon changed over to the existing, standard U.S. 30-06 round by order of General Douglas MacArthur. The decision was due in part to the large stockpiles of the ammunition that remained from the First World War. The basic M1 design was continually refined until 1940 when large-scale production finally began.</p>



<p>The gas operated, semiautomatic M1 rifle was the inspiration of John C. Garand, who designed the weapon while employed by the Springfield Armory. During World War II, the M1 rifle was manufactured by Springfield Armory and the Winchester Repeating Arms Company. Approximately 4,040,802 M1 rifles were manufactured from 1937 to 1945. The remarkable M1 design was to have a service life extending long past the conclusion of World War II.</p>



<p>In 1950, the outbreak of hostilities in Korea brought the World War II M1 out of pending retirement. A dwindling supply of rifles dictated that additional M1s would be needed and production resumed. During the Korean Conflict M1 rifles were manufactured by International Harvester, Harrington &amp; Richardson and the Springfield Armory. During the1950s era, approximately 1,427,970 additional M1 rifles were produced, and many more WWII era rifles refurbished. The last M1 rifle was manufactured in 1957.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="135" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11599" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4-300x58.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4-600x116.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2</strong></p>



<p>Immediately following World War I, experiments began on making a high speed air-cooled Browning machine gun variant for aircraft use. The original high speed guns were designed by Colt, and these included the M1918, M1918A1, M1919, and MG40. Each model had its problems, leading to the next variant. Part of the problem was that in going to the newer more powerful M2 .30-06 service cartridge, the cyclic rates went up by percentages in the 20% range. At 1,000 rpm, problem occurrences were magnified.</p>



<p>The final variant of the high speed Browning machine gun is commonly referred to as the “Aircraft Gun” or the “M2”. The prefix “AN” simply stands for “Army-Navy.” There were two basic models of the M2: Fixed or Flexible. The M2 Fixed gun was forward firing only, mounted in the wings or cowling, for remote firing by the pilot on an aircraft. The M2 Flexible gun had a spade grip assembly and was mounted so that an air gunner could engage targets within his traverse area.</p>



<p>The M2 guns were designed so that they could be switched out for feeding from either the right or left sides. This also allowed for the use of a twin mount. Twin M2 Browning machine guns firing at 1,200 rpm each made for a very impressive increase in hit probability in air battles.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="219" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11600" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3-300x94.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3-600x188.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The M1941 Johnson Rifle</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The M1941 Johnson Rifle</strong></p>



<p>Designed by Melvin M. Johnson, Jr., the M1941 Johnson was unique for a rifle caliber semiautomatic weapon because it was recoil operated rather than the more commonly used gas operating system. This unique feature made the Johnson rifle easy to manufacture and less prone to gas fouling. The weapon also featured a 10 round rotary magazine that could be topped off with additional rounds. The nomenclature M1941 was a commercial designation as there were no Johnson rifles manufactured under U.S. contracts.</p>



<p>The Johnson Automatics Company subcontracted with the Universal Windings Company to manufacture the weapon at their factory complex located in Cranston, Rhode Island. The company would be known as the Cranston Arms Company. Approximately 30,000 Johnson Rifles were manufactured before production ceased in early 1943.</p>



<p>Although the Marine Corps had chosen the M1 Garand, few M1 rifles were available as wartime demand far exceeded the supply. One feature of the Johnson rifle that the Marines liked was it could be easily broken down. This was considered an asset for their newly formed “Paramarine” battalions where the rifles could be easily carried when disassembled. The Marines procured a limited number of the Johnson rifles for issue to the 1st Parachute Battalion in 1942.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="334" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11601" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1-300x143.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1-600x286.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</strong></p>



<p>Invented and designed by Melvin M. Johnson, Jr., it was his intent that the M1941 Johnson LMG replace the BAR. Despite the light machine gun designation, it really was an automatic rifle like the BAR. Notwithstanding the name game, the M1941 LMG had many unique features. Chambered for the M2 .30-06 cartridge, it had a straight line stock which decreased muzzle rise during full automatic fire; necessitating a high front sight. It was light weight at only about 13 pounds and was very accurate in the semiautomatic mode as it fired from a closed bolt, yet in full automatic mode, fired from an open bolt to assist in cooling and preventing cook-offs from a hot barrel. The magazine well was also unique in that the 20-round box magazine could be topped-off by the addition of single rounds through the right side of the receiver or by five round stripper clips. Additionally, the feed lips were a machined part of the receiver rather than being part of the magazine and thus not subject to deformation. The M1941 LMG also employed a quick change barrel.</p>



<p>The M1941 Johnson light machine gun was never officially adopted by the U.S. but was used by selected units of the Marines and Army. Because BARs were in short supply, the U.S. Marines obtained a small quantity of M1941 LMGs primarily intended for use by airborne units and Marine Raiders which saw combat use in the South Pacific. The Army also acquired some M1941 LMGs for issue to the Army’s First Special Service Force, the OSS and there are unconfirmed reports that they were also used by some Army Rangers.</p>



<p>Though some 10,000 M1941 LMGs were produced by Cranston Arms Company, only a relative few (less than 3 percent) were used by the U.S. with the bulk originally ordered by the Dutch for use in the Dutch East Indies. At the fall of the Dutch East Indies to the Japanese, the remaining guns of the contract were embargoed so as not to fall into Japanese hands and is the reason a number of guns were available to the U.S. as needed.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="189" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11602" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1-300x81.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1-600x162.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</strong></p>



<p>The .30 caliber M37 machine gun was a post World War II machine gun variation designed as a secondary weapon for use on combat vehicles and tanks. The M37 differed from the M1919A4 in that it could be fed from either the right or left side by repositioning of a few parts. The top cover also had a new type latch that could be opened from either side. The M37 was generally used as a fixed tank weapon, but was also utilized in the flexible role, primarily by the U.S. Marine Corps. When used in the flexible role, rear sights were added and the weapon was used on the M2 tripod. Among other improvements, the M37 featured a chromed trunnion block, barrel and booster. Many of the parts of the M37 were redesigned and not readily interchangeable with the M1919A4 machine gun. Rock Island Arsenal and Saco-Lowell Shops manufactured the M37 machine gun from 1953 to 1969. The M37C variation was similar to the M37, but used an electric solenoid to fire the weapon, and rather than manually charged, it used a hydraulic system to perform the task. The M37C was used in early helicopter applications, as well as being fitted in the U.S. M48 and M60 tanks.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1903</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Bolt action<br>Overall length: 43.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches, twist right hand 1 turn in 10 inches<br>Weight: 8.69 pounds<br>Magazine: Integral, 5 round capacity<br>Sights: Front: blade.<br>Rear: M1903 ladder type, M1903-A3 stamped, aperture type .<br>Production: Pre-WWII approximately 1,704,779. During WWII 1,415,593<br>Manufacturers:<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;World War I: (M1903) Springfield Armory, Rock Island Arsenal.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;World War II: (M1903-A4) Remington Arms, L.C. Smith &amp; Corona</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 30 lbs.<br>Overall length: 48.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 25.1 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 400 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 30-round metal feed strip<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,800 yards Warner &amp; Swasey M1908 telescopic sight<br>Production: 670<br>Manufacturer: Colt, Springfield Armory</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil with muzzle gas assist<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 32.5 lbs. Tripod: 50 lbs.<br>Overall length: 43 inches<br>Barrel length: 28 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round cloth belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 12,125<br>Manufacturer: Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1904</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil with muzzle gas assist<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 57.5 lbs. Tripod: 80 lbs.<br>Overall length: 44 inches<br>Barrel length: 28.5 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 287<br>Manufacturer: Vickers, Sons &amp; Maxim, Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>M1914 Colt Automatic Gun</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas impingement system<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 35 lbs. Tripod: 56 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41 inches<br>Barrel length: 28 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 400 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round cloth belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 25,000<br>Manufacturer: Colt, Marlin-Rockwell</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 25.5 lbs. Bipod: 3 lbs.<br>Overall length: 51 inches<br>Barrel length: 26.5 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 47-round rotating pan magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade protected by ears.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,100 yards<br>Production: 8,500<br>Manufacturer: Savage Arms Co.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 30 lbs. Tripod: 53 lbs.<br>Overall length: 38.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,800 meters<br>Production: Approximately 72,000. Wartime 42,750<br>Manufacturer: New England Westinghouse, Remington, Colt.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Bolt-action<br>Overall length: 46.25 inches<br>Barrel length: 26 inches, twist: left hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 9.187 pounds<br>Magazine: 5 rounds integral box type<br>Sights: Front: protected blade<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable ladder sight<br>Production: Approximately 2.4 million<br>Manufacturers: Remington, Winchester, Eddystone</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, semiautomatic, long-recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 19 lbs.<br>Overall length: 45.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 17 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 300 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 16-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: V-notch tangent<br>Production: 19,241<br>Manufacturer: C.S.R.G. (Chauchat, Sutter, Ribeyrolle &amp; Gladiator</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Marlin Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917/18</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated straight piston<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 25.0 lbs.<br>Overall length: 40 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 600 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front and rear sights varied by model and application. Ground guns had similar sights to theColt M1914. Other mountings used a variety of aircraft and anti-aircraft sights.<br>Production: 1917 (Navy): 1,605; 1917/18<br>Aircraft: 38,000<br>Manufacturer: Marlin Arms Corporation, Marlin-RockwellCompany</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30,Model of 1918</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, semiautomatic, gas operation<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 15.5 lbs.<br>Overall length: 47 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable<br>Production: 102,125<br>Manufacturer: Winchester, Marlin-Rockwell, Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 33 lbs. Tripod: 53 lbs.<br>Overall length: 38.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,600 yards.<br>Production: 55,859<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operation<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 19.4 lbs.<br>Overall length: 47.8 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 300-450/ 500-650 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable<br>Production: 249,380 total new production as A2<br>Manufacturer: New England Small Arms (NESA), 168,363; IBM Corporation, 20,017; Royal Typewriter Company, 61,000</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 32.5 lbs.<br>Overall length: 53 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Folding blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,600 yards.<br>Production: 43,479<br>Manufacturer: Saginaw Steering Gear Div. of General Motors</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2 Caliber: .30-06</strong><br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 23.0 lbs<br>Overall length: 39.9 inches<br>Barrel length: 23.9 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 1,200 rounds per minute<br>Feed: disintegrating links Sights: Varied according to mounting<br>Production: Brown-Lipe-Chapin 33,311; Buffalo<br>Arms Co. 96,822; Savage 14,800; Colt 49,681<br>Manufacturer: Brown-Lipe-Chapin Div. General Motors, Buffalo Arms Company, Savage Arms, Corporation. Colt’s Patent Firearms Mfg.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 31 lbs. Tripod: 14 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450-500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt or disintegrating links<br>Sights: Front: Folding blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,400 yards.<br>Production: RIA 31,596; Saginaw 367,853; Buffalo 38,300. Total production of all M1919A4 variants from 1939 to 1945: 441,494.<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal, Saginaw Steering Gear Div. of General Motors, Buffalo Arms Co</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Semiautomatic, gas operated<br>Overall length: 43.6-inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches, twist: right hand, 1 turn in 10 inches<br>Weight: 9.5 pounds<br>Magazine: 8 round enbloc clip<br>Sights: Front: Blade with protective ears<br>Rear: Aperture<br>Production: Approximately 5,468,772<br>Manufacturers: World War II: Springfield Armory, Winchester Korean War era: Harrington &amp; Richardson, International Harvester, Springfield Armory</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>M1941 Johnson Rifle</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Semiautomatic, short recoil operated<br>Overall length: 45.87 inches<br>Barrel length: 22 inches, twist: right hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 9.5 pounds<br>Feed: Internal rotary type, 10 round capacity<br>Sights: Front: blade with protective ears<br>Rear: aperture type, graduated in meters<br>Production: Approximately 30,000<br>Manufacturer: Cranston Arms Company</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full Automatic, semiautomatic, short recoil operated<br>Overall length: 42 inches<br>Barrel length: 22 inches, twist: right hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 13 pounds<br>Cyclic rate: 450 rounds per minute<br>Magazine: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: blade with protective ears<br>Rear: Folding aperture type, graduated in meters<br>Production: Approximately 10,000<br>Manufacturer: Cranston Arms Company</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 31 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41.75 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450-550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: Disintegrating links<br>Sights: Added for C Front: Folding blade<br>Added for C Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,400 yards.<br>Production: RIA 7,340; Saco, unknown<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal, Saco-Lowell Shops</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N1 (October 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>M1 RIFLE OF THE KOREAN WAR</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/m1-rifle-of-the-korean-war/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1 (Oct 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian Marksmanship Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Eagle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrington & Richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Harvester Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James L Guion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John C Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Line Material Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SA/JLG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springfield Armory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T20E2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winchester Repeating Arms Company]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Frank Iannamico There have been many accolades bestowed upon the World War II performance of the semiautomatic Caliber .30, U.S. M1 rifle, better known as the Garand. The U.S. had prudently adopted the M1 rifle back in 1936. During the ensuing years the weapon was continually being developed and improved, resulting in an exceptionally [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Frank Iannamico</strong></em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="374" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-119.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11919" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-119.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-119-300x160.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-119-600x321.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>South Korean soldiers hone their marksmanship skills with the U.S. M1 Garand rifle. Despite a substantial production run during the 1950s era, most of the M1 rifles used during the war were refurbished weapons of World War II vintage. (U.S. Army photo)</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>There have been many accolades bestowed upon the World War II performance of the semiautomatic Caliber .30, U.S. M1 rifle, better known as the Garand. The U.S. had prudently adopted the M1 rifle back in 1936. During the ensuing years the weapon was continually being developed and improved, resulting in an exceptionally reliable weapon by December 1941 when the U.S. was suddenly plunged into war. The United States’ M1 rifle was by far the most successful semiautomatic service rifle fielded in World War II. Russia and Germany also fielded limited numbers of semi-auto rifles, but none of them could compare to John C. Garand’s M1.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="414" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-175.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11920" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-175.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-175-300x177.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-175-600x355.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>T<em>ypical DOD Eagle acceptance stamp on a 1950s’ manufacture M1 rifle stock. (Courtesy Scott </em>Duff)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Despite its stellar reputation, the M1 rifle did have a few shortcomings, such as its enbloc 8-round clip that made a distinct sound when ejected, and the rifle’s propensity to jam during a heavy rainfall. Work had begun during World War II to fix the weapon’s various problems as well as provide the rifle with a select-fire capability. During 1945 a select-fire, magazine fed Garand designated as the T20E2 rifle was briefly adopted as a limited procurement item. However, the end of the war curtailed all interest in the weapon resulting in the cancellation of a contract for 100,000 of the modified Garand Rifles.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="185" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-163.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11921" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-163.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-163-300x79.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-163-600x159.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The veteran M1 Garand rifle once again proved itself during the Korean War, receiving high accolades from the troops that fought with them. Even during the frigid Korean winters the M1 proved accurate, reliable and deadly.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>There were only two concerns that manufactured the M1 rifle during World War II; the U.S. Government Springfield Armory and the Winchester Repeating Arms Company. By the end of World War II the total production of M1 rifles was 4,040,802 weapons, a wartime production figure second only to the M1 carbine. All during the war there numerous upgrades and modifications being implemented into the rifle. When hostilities ended in 1945, M1 production was suddenly terminated, and the Springfield Armory began to receive shipments of well-used M1 rifles to upgrade, rebuild and place into long-term storage.</p>



<p>On 25 June 1950, the North Korean Army stormed across the 38th Parallel on the Korean peninsula into South Korea marking the start of the Korean War. The U.S. took quick action under the United Nations flag to assist their South Korean allies and basically fought the war with same small arms issued in World War II. The same U.S. weapons were also supplied to the South Korean army. As the war dragged on a need for additional service rifles became apparent. Despite the continued work on a select-fire, magazine fed service rifle, none were manufactured for issue. Instead, the government decided to resume production of the stalwart M1 Garand rifle. The Springfield Armory, who had produced a large number of M1 rifles during World War II, began to remove its vast array of M1 tooling and machinery from storage. During 1951, preparations for resuming manufacture began, however the monthly rifle and spare parts production rate was nowhere near that achieved during the Second World War.</p>



<p>International Harvester Company was awarded a government contract for the manufacture of M1 rifles at their Evansville, Indiana plant on June 15, 1951. The company’s primary business was the manufacture of commercial trucks and farm machinery. Although the company was seemingly an odd choice to manufacture a service rifle, experiences during World War II had proven that American companies, especially those who had mass production assembly line experience, could easily adapt and produce excellent small arms, and in large quantities. The location of the International Harvester plant was also considered to be geographically advantageous, due to the growing post World War II fear of a nuclear attack on North America. Small arms manufacturers like the Armory, Colt, H&amp;R and High Standard were all located in the New England area and could theoretically be wiped out in a single strike.</p>



<p>The Line Material Company of Birmingham, Alabama was granted its first government contract for the manufacture of M1 rifle barrels on April 30, 1951. The barrels were marked LMR for contractor identification and were used on International Harvester rifles and were, on occasion, supplied to the Harrington &amp; Richardson factory.</p>



<p>The Harrington &amp; Richardson Arms Company of Worcester, Massachusetts received a government contract for 100,000 complete M1 rifles and spare parts on April 3, 1952. There were several contract amendments issued for additional M1 rifles from H&amp;R. Harrington &amp; Richardson was a well established manufacturer of sporting arms, and had produced the Reising submachine gun during World War II, and on into the 1950s for police sales. They would also become a primary contractor for the U.S. 7.62mm M14 rifles.</p>



<p>The adoption of the M14 rifle and 7.62mm NATO cartridge on May 1, 1957 would signal the end of the M1 Garand’s long reign as the standard U.S. service rifle. M1 Rifle production continued until May 17, 1957 when the last service grade M1 emerged from the Springfield Armory plant.</p>



<p>Original World War II configuration M1 rifles are quite uncommon, due to the Ordnance Corps rebuild and upgrade programs. The exclusive use of corrosive caliber .30 ammunition during World War II also resulted in the replacement of many of the rifle’s original 1940s dated barrels. An original configuration 1940s era M1 is able to bring quite a premium price in today’s M1 collectors market. This situation has resulted in a growing collector interest in the M1 rifles manufactured during the Korean War. Many original Korean era M1 rifles can be found in good to excellent condition, because most were actually manufactured after the Korean War had ended. Despite a production run during the 1950 to 1953 war era, most of the M1 rifles used during the war were refurbished weapons of World War II vintage.</p>



<p>Springfield Armory rifles manufactured during the 1950s era will have serial numbers beginning in approximately the 4,200,000 range. Like the World War II era Springfield rifles, the receivers were marked with the Springfield Armory name. The barrels and parts were marked SA and the barrels were also marked with a 1950’s date of manufacture. The stock cartouches on early manufacture rifles would be SA/JLG to designate the Army Inspector of Ordnance Colonel James L. Guion. After 1953, rifles of Springfield manufacture would have been fitted with a stock stamped with the Defense Eagle stamp enclosed inside 1/2-inch square box also known as the DOD stamp. Total production at the Springfield Armory from 1952 through 1956 was 661,747 rifles.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="255" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-146.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11923" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-146.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-146-300x109.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-146-600x219.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Left: Markings of a 1950s M1 Rifle manufactured by the International Harvester Company. International Harvester M1 rifles had at least four separate varieties of receiver marking configurations, due to the subcontracting of some of the company’s receiver manufacture. Center: Receiver makings on a 1950s Springfield Armory manufactured M1 rifle. The 1954 barrel date on this rifle would indicate that it was made after the Korean War had ended. Right: Markings on a Harrington &amp; Richardson (H&amp;R) M1 rifle receiver heel. (Courtesy of Scott Duff)</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>International Harvester M1 rifles had at least four separate varieties of receiver marking configurations, due to the subcontracting of some of the company’s receiver manufacture. Barrels found on International Harvester M1s are usually those of the Line Material Company marked with the letters LMR. Parts manufactured by or for International Harvester were stamped IHC. All stock cartouches were the Defense Eagle stamp enclosed inside 3/8-inch square box. International Harvester produced 337,623 rifles from 1953 until 1956.</p>



<p>Harrington and Richardson M1 rifle receivers were marked H&amp;R Arms Co. Barrels and other parts were marked with the letters HRA, although there is evidence that during production some H&amp;R M1 rifles were fitted with barrels supplied by the Lines Material Company (LMR). All H&amp;R stocks were stamped with the Defense Eagle cartouche enclosed inside 1/2-inch square box. The company manufactured 428,600 M1 rifles from 1953 to 1956.</p>



<p>There are certainly enough variations of post-World War II M1 Garand receivers, parts and barrels to interest the purist collector, as well as today’s average shooter/collector.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="570" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-122.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11924" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-122.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-122-300x244.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-122-600x489.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Top: Markings on an M1 rifle barrel that was manufactured by the Line Material Company. The barrels were marked LMR for contractor identification. LMR made barrels were used on International Harvester and some H&amp;R M1 rifles. This barrel is dated March, 1954 indicating post-Korean War manufacture.</em><br><em>Below: Markings on a Springfield Armory (SA) M1 rifle barrel manufactured during October, 1954.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>M1 Garand rifles were at one time difficult for collectors to obtain resulting in the salvaging of many demilled receivers by welding remnant pieces back together. During the 1980 period many M1 rifles and other U.S. small arms were allowed to be re-imported back to the U.S. as many of these rifles had been given to friendly countries as military aid. Many of the re-imported rifles came back from Korea, their condition being anywhere from good to poor. One government import requirement that turned many collectors off was that the barrels had to be marked with the importer’s name and address. Sometimes this was tastefully done with small letters; others used much larger fonts that greatly distracted from the gun’s appearance. Another source for M1 Garand rifles has been the Civilian Marksmanship Program; more commonly known as the CMP. The CMP offers M1 rifles in various grades direct from U.S. Government stores. Both of the rifles available from these sources are commonly referred to as “mix-masters,” meaning that the rifles were assembled from parts from different manufacturers and eras. This is a common virtue among U.S. weapons that have been repaired or have undergone Ordnance rebuild programs. The CMP does however occasionally offer “collector grade” M1 rifles, although these generally sell out very quickly. Another source for collector grade M1 rifles is from M1 expert and author Scott Duff. Scott has written many articles and books on the M1 rifle and is highly regarded among the M1 collector community. He posts his rifle offerings monthly at http://www.scott-duff.com and they usually sell out very quickly.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N1 (October 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" src="blob:https://smallarmsreview.com/82011492-d41f-4113-b266-004951f4a626" alt=""/></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
