<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Hand Grenade &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/hand-grenade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 21:29:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Versatile, Makeshift Solution – the Explosive Nipolit</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/a-versatile-makeshift-solution-the-explosive-nipolit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Heidler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearm History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hand Grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nipolit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=38605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since the campaign in the East, despite great initial successes, did not lead to a rapid defeat of the Red Army, the German forces used more ammunition than originally planned. Stockpiles shrank alarmingly and the arms industry had to resort more and more often to inferior raw materials or substitutes - such as "Nipolit".]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Michael Heidler &#8211; </p>



<p><em>Since the campaign in the East, despite great initial successes, did not lead to a rapid defeat of the Red Army, the German forces used more ammunition than originally planned. Stockpiles shrank alarmingly and the arms industry had to resort more and more often to inferior raw materials or substitutes &#8211; such as &#8220;Nipolit&#8221;.</em></p>



<p>In August 1942 alone, the total ammunition consumption of the ground forces on the Eastern Front was 143,624 tons, or over 4,600 tons per day. While consumption was steadily increasing, the shortfalls in ammunition production due to bombing damage and lack of raw materials were becoming painfully apparent. As an example, the light field howitzers fired over 3.6 million rounds in August 1943, while only 2.8 million rounds could be supplied. The General Quartermaster of the Army noted: &#8220;If the heavy fighting in the East continues, the ammunition supply can no longer be guaranteed.”</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="655" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-1024x655.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38611" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-1024x655.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-300x192.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-768x492.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-1536x983.jpg 1536w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-2048x1311.jpg 2048w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-750x480.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2a-Nipolit-HandGr_250-500-gram-1140x730.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The egg hand grenades with 250 and 500 grams of Nipolite still had the usual friction fuse.</figcaption></figure>



<p>During these difficult times, Dr. Erich von Holt at the Westfälisch-Anhaltische Sprengstoff-Actien-Gesellschaft (WASAG) developed a solvent-free explosive using powder from emptied shell cases (mostly captured ammunition), delivery remnants, and cut-off waste. The end-product obtained from this residue recycling, consisting of 25% nitropenta, 25% diglycol, and about 50% nitrocellulose, was given the designation &#8220;Nipolit&#8221;. It was thermoplastic deformable, had high strength, and could be machined mechanically without danger. In particular, explosive devices, such as hand grenades, could be formed without a metal coating.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-medium"><img decoding="async" width="183" height="300" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg-183x300.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38612" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg-183x300.jpg 183w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg-625x1024.jpg 625w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg-768x1259.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg-937x1536.jpg 937w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg-750x1229.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2c-Nipolit-HandGr_egg.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 183px) 100vw, 183px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Nipolit could be pressed into shape and did not require any metal coating.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The Waffen-SS also became aware of this new explosive. At a meeting in November 1942 between the Ammunition Commission and the SS-Waffenamt (weapons office), represented by SS-Oberführer Heinrich Gärtner (head of the office) and SS-Oberführer Otto Schwab (head of the technical office VIII for research, development, and patents), about current developments, Nipolit hand grenades were also a topic of discussion. The SS was working on a hand grenade impact fuse which was &#8216;foolproof&#8217; and which also couldn’t go off unintentionally even if a wounded soldier let it drop out of his hand. In Germany, only friction fuses had been used thus far. The grenade had to be thrown as soon as the fuse was activated, whereas foreign models with safety lever, like the ones used by the Americans, were activated during flight by the released spring-loaded lever after the grenade was thrown. The soldier could, therefore, hold the grenade in his hand for as long as he wanted after the safety pin was removed and wait for the perfect moment to throw it.</p>



<p>The SS-Waffenamt, therefore, developed an impact fuse, which was housed between two half-shells made of Nipolit. During transport, the hand grenade was secured by a safety pin. The soldier had to pull it out laterally to arm the fuse before throwing the grenade. The tests with it dragged on, but finally came to a satisfactory result.</p>



<p>While the Heereswaffenamt (army weapons office) showed little interest in Nipolit, the situation at the SS-Waffenamt was completely different. There, they assessed the potential of the explosives differently and tried to develop various types of hand grenades and hollow charge ammunition. Even other branches of the armed forces ordered from the SS. In September 1944, for example, the air force weapons inspector of the Kampfgeschwader 200, which is well known for various special operations, received a total of 25 Nipolit hand grenades from the Forensic Institute of the Security Police (KTI), a department of the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA), for a foreign mission.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="707" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-1024x707.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38613" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-1024x707.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-300x207.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-768x531.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-1536x1061.jpg 1536w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-2048x1415.jpg 2048w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-750x518.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-Nipolit-IncendiaryHGr-1140x788.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Various fillings were experimented with in development of incendiary hand grenades. Here the version with thermite filling is shown.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The destruction of immobilized tanks was a major problem for the troops at the front. All too often, the enemy was able to recapture and tow away those tanks that were only slightly damaged or stuck in mud. SS-Oberführer Gärtner, as the head of the SS-Waffenamt, therefore demanded a hand grenade with Nipolite casing and incendiary filling. This would have enabled the infantry to set a tank on fire and damage it in such a way that repair was no longer an option. At Gärtner&#8217;s insistence, the Heereswaffenamt took over the development in February 1943 under the designation &#8220;Brandhandgranate 4857” (incendiary hand grenade). The filling consisted of 225 cc of viscous flame oil with various ingredients. Tests in November 1944 resulted in an immediate ignition and a good incendiary effect with strong smoke development. The incendiary mass also adhered to vertical walls. So, the grenade worked technically perfectly, but it was not as easy as expected to set a tank on fire. To do so, the incendiary mass had to get into the engine compartment, which proved to be very difficult in practice and finally prevented the introduction of this type of hand grenade.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="655" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3-1024x655.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38615" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3-1024x655.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3-300x192.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3-768x492.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3-750x480.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3-1140x730.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-T-34-burning-3.jpg 1500w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">It was difficult for the infantry to set immobile enemy tanks on fire. The SS-Waffenamt thought they could find a solution in the form of an incendiary hand grenade.</figcaption></figure>



<p>In the meantime, the composition of Nipolit had also changed. The course of the war caused the supply of diglycol to dry up and production could only continue by processing various captured powders. The output fell to about 100 tons per month. But the SS-Waffenamt remained active in this field. Fragmentation sleeves (Splitterring) made of sheet metal with predetermined breaking points were supposed to give the caseless Nipolit hand grenades a better splintering effect. In 1943, comparative tests were conducted between the SS sleeves and the different shaped ones developed by the Richard Rinker company on behalf of the Heereswaffenamt. The &#8220;Rinker Splitterringe&#8221; proved to be better because of their higher penetration rate. However, since Rinker was already working at full capacity due to other orders, the troops were to be equipped with the SS fragmentation sleeves for the time being. However, a larger series production of the sleeves was not possible at all.</p>



<p>On 30 November 1944, at a meeting of the Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production, it was determined that the Volkssturm should be equipped with the &#8220;Volkshandgranate 45&#8221; (people’s hand grenade). This consisted of a mixture of concrete and metal splinters (named “shrapnel concrete”) and had a good effect. SS-Obergruppenführer and general of the Waffen-SS, Gotllob Berger, in his function as chief of staff of the German Volkssturm, then ordered 100,000 of these grenades from the Preußische Bergwerks- und Hütten-AG (Preussag) in December, which were to be delivered as quickly as possible.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="567" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5b-VolksHGr_concrete_b-567x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38614" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5b-VolksHGr_concrete_b-567x1024.jpg 567w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5b-VolksHGr_concrete_b-166x300.jpg 166w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5b-VolksHGr_concrete_b-768x1386.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5b-VolksHGr_concrete_b-750x1354.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5b-VolksHGr_concrete_b.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-width: 567px) 100vw, 567px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The “Volkshandgranate 45” (people&#8217;s hand grenade) was originally cast out of concrete, but lack of cement forced the change to Nipolit.</figcaption></figure>



<p>In order to speed up the process, SS-Standartenführer Purucker, in his capacity as commissioner for armament and equipment of the German Volkssturm, immediately appointed Dr. von Felsen, the operator of Preussag, as his colleague in the field of the application of shrapnel concrete for Volkssturm ammunition and assigned him personal responsibility for the control and development of these types of ammunition.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="744" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-744x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38616" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-744x1024.jpg 744w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-218x300.jpg 218w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-768x1057.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-1116x1536.jpg 1116w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-1488x2048.jpg 1488w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-750x1032.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-1140x1569.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11b-Doc_Gaertner_IncendiaryHGr_2-scaled.jpg 1860w" sizes="(max-width: 744px) 100vw, 744px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Correspondence between the SS-Waffenamt and the army. Unfortunately, the incendiary hand grenade did not fulfill the hopes placed in it.</figcaption></figure>



<p>But rapid production was not successful for the time being. There was simply a lack of necessary cement. Even the simplest raw materials had become a scarce commodity. The production requirement would have been 900 tons per month, but by the end of January 1945 the total stock amounted to a pitiful 200 tons. And supplies were not in sight. At the Preussag cement plant in Rüdersdorf near Berlin, cement production had actually already ceased, but a cement kiln was now to be kept in operation at all costs. Coal was available for about two months of operation.</p>



<p>Only after lengthy negotiations was General Buhle able to obtain the provision of Nipolit as a substitute for the missing cement. He informed SS-Standartenführer Purucker on 28 January: &#8220;The delivery of Nipolit explosives for 100,000 Volkshandgranaten 45 was ordered on 25 January 1945, to the company Sprengstoff A.G., Rheinsdorf.” Unfortunately, there are no more details known about the production quantities. At least, some relics dug up along the Eastern front lines prove that these grenades were used in both variations with cement and Nipolite casing.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-700x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38617" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-700x1024.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-205x300.jpg 205w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-768x1123.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-1050x1536.jpg 1050w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-1400x2048.jpg 1400w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-750x1097.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-1140x1667.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12b-Doc_Nipolit_instead_of_cement-scaled.jpg 1750w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A few months before the end of the war, there was not enough cement left in Berlin to cast the hand grenades. Nipolit was procured as a replacement.</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HAND GRENADE M. 1923</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/hand-grenade-m-1923/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N6 (Mar 2009)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anders Thygesen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erik Olsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hand Bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hand Grenade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M41]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odense’s electrical plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N6]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=14973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Anders Thygesen It was a shameful day when the Germans occupied Denmark on April 9, 1940. The government surrendered after only a few hours of fighting and the chance of recognition as an ally of England was not to be in this round. However, not all good Danes accepted the government’s recommendation of accepting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Anders Thygesen</em></p>



<p><em>It was a shameful day when the Germans occupied Denmark on April 9, 1940. The government surrendered after only a few hours of fighting and the chance of recognition as an ally of England was not to be in this round. However, not all good Danes accepted the government’s recommendation of accepting the presence of the occupying force without sword blows, and on the very next day, April 10, 1940, the first illegal sabotage strike was dealt with the blast from a Danish hand grenade M23.</em></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="619" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14976" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53-300x265.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/001-53-600x531.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Cutaway of Hand Bomb M23. Right &#8211; Hand Grenade M23 with fragmentation shells attached.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The day prior, Danish engineer Erik Olsen from Odense’s electrical plant obtained the hand grenade from the Odense army barracks and subsequently threw it at a German troop transport train near Marslev. It was hardly an act that kept the German occupying force awake at night; nevertheless it was the opening salvo in a long line of sabotage missions conducted by a growing and extraordinarily effective resistance movement.</p>



<p><strong>The Different Models</strong></p>



<p>The basic version was the Hand Bomb M23 (offensive). Enveloped in an additional pair of cast iron fragmentation shells, manually attachable with steel wire, the Hand Bomb would become the Hand Grenade M23 (defensive). Both grenades were painted grey and some had a yellow band painted around the body of the grenade.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="662" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14977" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61-300x284.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/002-61-600x567.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The ventilation holes are visible in the fuse housing. The holes were normally covered with a piece of lacquered paper, but because these grenade’s fuses have been ignited, the hot escaping gasses have burned away the paper. Also, the filler hole is visible on the grenade to the right. When the grenade was filled, a metal plate was soldered on to close the hole.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The construction of the practice version of the M23 differed slightly from the live version in that it was made from thicker steel as it had to withstand multiple impacts with the ground from throwing practice. A special cartridge containing a small black powder charge to simulate a detonation had to be inserted and it could be reloaded and thrown multiple times. The drawback was that it had to be returned to the manufacturer for reassembly of the fuse section. All the practice M23s were painted yellow or grey; the grey with a black band painted on the top cone.</p>



<p>In 1941 a new variant of the practice grenade, called the Blank Hand Bomb M41, was introduced for use in combat drill scenarios. The top 2/3 was made from wood and the bottom 1/3 from a cardboard tube filled with black powder. Just like the yellow practice grenade it could be reloaded but it also had to be returned to the manufacturer for reassembly.</p>



<p>A blank Hand Bomb/Hand Grenade M23 made from wood and steel was also used but no pyrotechnics were involved and it was only used to practice throwing an object with similar weight and shape.</p>



<p>The grenade body consists of a 0.6 millimeter (0.0236 inch) thick steel cylinder with conical cups soldered to each end. The top cone houses the fuse and striker which are threaded into a central tube running through the whole length of the grenade body, ending up protruding from the bottom cone. The detonator designated Taendpatron M. 23 was enclosed inside the other end of the tube behind the knurled brass end cap.</p>



<p>The fuse, from which the striker protrudes, has four vent holes positioned 90 degrees apart in the housing. One end of a safety wire extends through a hole in the striker and the other end extends through a hole in the safety interrupter tube and the safety interrupter. The safety interrupter rests in a tubed T-section inserted in the centre of the well thereby separating the delay charge from the flash channel leading to the detonator. On the opposite side of the safety interrupter there is a rectangular cover plate soldered over the filler hole.</p>



<p>The interrupter assures that the grenade doesn’t detonate prematurely due to a defective delay charge or before it has been thrown to a safe distance.</p>



<p>If the delay charge burns through with the interrupter still in place, the spark will be stopped before reaching the 2-second delay flash channel. The interrupter has a channel drilled lengthwise about 3/4 deep and it ends up in a vent hole. This is so the hot expanding gasses from the burning fuse can escape via the channel and out through the vent hole, into the interrupter tube and out without making contact with the 2-second fuse below.</p>



<p>One of the obvious drawbacks to this design is that the grenade is extremely sensitive to water and even just moisture, hence every single grenade was packed in a wax sealed cardboard box. The moisture sensitivity problem in combination with the complex functionality and cumbersome design made it no match compared to the British and U.S. pineapple or the German M24 stick grenade.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="470" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-60.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14979" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-60.jpg 470w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/003-60-201x300.jpg 201w" sizes="(max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px" /><figcaption><em>Handbomb Model 1923. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, December 6, 1935.)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In order to throw the grenade, a firm grip around the grenade body with the thumb resting on the interrupter, are advised. Then the safety wire going through the striker is pulled out and then the other end of the wire has to be pulled from the safety interrupter. Now hit the striker plate hard with the other hand or against any hard surface with enough force to overpower the creep spring holding the primer away from the fixed firing pin, thereby ramming the percussion primer into the firing pin, initiating the primer, which in turn ignites the delay charge. A hissing sound from the 3.5 second black powder delay fuse is heard and the lacquered paper covering the four vent holes will start burning away.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="638" height="303" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14980" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55.jpg 638w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55-300x142.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/004-55-600x285.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 638px) 100vw, 638px" /><figcaption><em>Taendpatron M23: Length 42 mm, diameter 9.2 mm, weight 13.5 grams, delay charge 2 seconds. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, 22 December, 1923)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>When thrown, the grenade will spin along the lengthwise axis like an American football, thereby causing the centrifugal power and gravity to pull out the interrupter from the grenade body. After about 3 meters (10 feet) of flight the interrupter will fall away and the grenade is now armed.</p>



<p>The grenade is filled with 150 grams (5.3 oz) of Trinitrotoluene (TNT), making the total weight of the grenade 350 grams (12.3 oz). The M23 offensive grenade has an effective range of only 4 meters (13 feet). The official safety distance is 60 meters (197 feet) but it is advised that unprotected personnel turn their back towards the detonation site or at least cover their faces.</p>



<p>The markings can vary from the number “23” or a letter “K” inside a 12 pointed star and “AK/B 1942” the number being the year of manufacture. Also the stenciled letters “AMA” can be found being the abbreviation for the Danish ammunition factory named AmMunitions Arsenalet. Additionally, many of them have a painted 3/4-inch wide yellow band.</p>



<p>The defensive Hand grenade M23 is basically a Hand Bomb M23 in disguise. Two fragmentation shells made from cast iron are attached to the grenade body with two wire loops. A cutout has been made in the two shells to make room for the safety interrupter and safety wire. According to the manual, the shells will fragment into 48 pieces weighing 3.2 grams (0.1129 oz) and 64 pieces weighing 2.3 grams (0.081 oz) the effective range being 10 to 15 meters (32 to 50 feet). The official safety distance is 150 meters (492 feet) but again it is advised that unprotected personnel turn their back towards the detonation site.</p>



<p>The shells weigh 150 grams (5.291 oz) each, almost doubling the weight of the grenade to a total of 650 grams (30 oz). The operational procedure for the defensive grenade is, for obvious reasons, exactly the same as for the offensive.</p>



<p><strong>Taendpatron Model 1923/31/41 (Detonator)</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="455" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-44.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14981" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-44.jpg 455w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/005-44-195x300.jpg 195w" sizes="(max-width: 455px) 100vw, 455px" /><figcaption><em>(Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Håndgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, January 30, 1925.)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The detonator M23 consist of a brass section containing a 2 second black powder delay charge and a copper section containing 2 grams (0.0705 oz) of mercury fulminate explosive charge. The copper section is crimped to the brass section and the open end of the brass tube is sealed with a bakelite cap.</p>



<p>In 1931, the mercury fulminate was discontinued and replaced with Tetryl and lead acid, which is a more stable and powerful explosive. Also, both sections were made from brass. The diameter of the bakelite cap was increased from 9 mm to 10 mm to avoid the possible mistake of inserting the detonator with the bakelite seal still in place. Due to these modifications the nomenclature was changed to Taendpatron Model 1931.</p>



<p>In 1941, it was found that the total delay time at 5.5 seconds (3.5 sec. + 2 sec.) was too long and a new Taendpatron (detonator) with a delay charge of only 0.5 second was introduced, reducing the total delay to 4 seconds (3.5 sec + 0.5 sec). This detonator received the nomenclature Taendpatron Model 1941.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="367" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14982" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39-300x157.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/006-39-600x315.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>(Illustration: Flådens og Kystdefentionens Håndvåben og Maskinskyts, Copenhagen 1942)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Hand Bomb Model 1923 (Practice)</strong></p>



<p>The practice version of the M23 offensive grenade came in two different colors. One is painted yellow to distinguish it from the live grenade, and the other is grey with a 10 mm (0.3937 inch) black painted band around the top cone. Apart from the color, it differs by being thicker in the construction as the cylindrical mid section of the grenade body is made from 2.5 mm (0.09 inch) and the cones from 1 mm (0.039 inch) thick metal versus the 0.6 mm (0.0236 inch) on the live grenade. The alteration was solely made for reasons of durability and had no influence on the functionality or use of the grenade. Furthermore, the practice grenades have no filler hole or cover plate. Two small holes, one just below the safety interrupter and another one on the opposite side on the top of the cone, are drilled in the body to further tell them apart from the live grenades. Both holes are approximately 2.5 mm (0.09 inch) in diameter. Additionally, the knurled brass end caps on practice grenades have a central 6 mm exhaust hole so the gas and smoke from the spotter charge can escape. The practice grenades also usually have a string of dots from a mandrel on the mid cylinder just below the safety interrupter. The number of dots can vary from just one to numerous and they serve the purpose of telling how many times this particular grenade has been reloaded. Two fragmentation shells can of course be attached to the practice grenade in order to simulate the defensive Hand Grenade M23.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="666" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14983" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33.jpg 666w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33-285x300.jpg 285w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/007-33-600x631.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 666px) 100vw, 666px" /><figcaption><em>Hand Bomb M23 with one of two fragmentation shells. This example has a painted yellow band.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The grenade can be armed with two different charges. A black powder spotting charge called Ovelses Taendpatron M23 (drill charge M23) can be inserted into the detonator channel covered by the brass end cap.</p>



<p>The spotting charge is an enclosed unit containing the second delay fuse (2 sec.) along with a small 0.7 gram (11 grain) black powder charge sealed off with a lump of wax. When the charge fires the wax seal, the expanding gases and smoke escape through the 6 mm central hole in the end cap. To follow up on the modified detonator M41 the delay was reduced from 2 seconds to 0.5 seconds and now renamed Ovelses Taendpatron M41 (drill Charge M41). The drill charge is painted red, stamped with the Danish letter “Ø” meaning “Drill” and made from brass.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="668" height="306" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14984" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29.jpg 668w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29-300x137.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/008-29-600x275.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 668px) 100vw, 668px" /><figcaption><em>Drill charge M23 loaded with black powder and sealed with wax. Length 54 mm, diameter 9.2, weight 23 grams. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, December 22, 1923)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The other charge is a Provetaendpatron M23 (Test charge M23), which consists of only the black powder 2 second delay element. The grenade could then be test fired and demonstrated inside a class room. The test charge’s outer appearance is similar to the drill charge except it has four holes drilled from the side and one from the bottom. In 1941, the delay was reduced to 0.5 second and renamed Provetaendpatron M41 (Test Charge M41).</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="485" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009-27.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14985" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009-27.jpg 485w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/009-27-208x300.jpg 208w" sizes="(max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px" /><figcaption><em>Notice the thicker wall on the cylindrical mid piece and the 6 mm exhaust hole in the end cap. (Illustration: Materielbekendtgørelse/Haandgranatmateriel M. 1923. Copenhagen, January 30, 1925)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="401" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/010-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14986" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/010-19.jpg 401w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/010-19-172x300.jpg 172w" sizes="(max-width: 401px) 100vw, 401px" /><figcaption><em>Illustration of the Blank Hand Bomb M41. Notice the dummy safety interrupter.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Hand Bomb Model 1941</strong></p>



<p>In 1941 a new practice grenade called Los Haandbombe M41 (Blank Hand Bomb M41) was introduced. The top 2/3 is made from wood and has a steel cylinder inserted in order to gain weight equivalent to the live grenade. The bottom 1/3 is made from a cardboard tube and filled with 30 grams (1.058 oz) of black powder. The safety interrupter is non functional and only serves the purpose of resembling the live one. Because of the black powder charge, a safety distance of 3 meters (10 feet) was set. Just like the yellow and grey practice grenades it could be reloaded but it had to be returned to the manufacturer for reassembling. The first versions were unpainted wood and the cardboard were painted black; later the wood was painted white and finally the last versions were painted grey all over except for the black band around the top.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="291" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14987" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15-300x125.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/011-15-600x249.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Test charge M/41. Four holes are drilled for easy recognition. (Illustration: Flådens og Kystdefentionens Håndvåben og Maskinskyts, Copenhagen 1942)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="655" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14988" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13-300x281.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/012-13-600x561.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The M23 practice grenade can be recognized by two 2.5 mm (0.0984 inch) holes drilled in the body. One hole is drilled just below the safety interrupter as shown on the grey grenade and the other on the top of the cone on the opposite side as shown on the yellow grenade. Also the knurled brass end cap on practice grenades has a central 6 mm exhaust hole so the gas and smoke from the spotter charge can escape. Notice the mandrel stamps on the grey grenade telling how many times it has been reloaded.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="532" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14989" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8-300x228.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/013-8-600x456.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>A box with 10 second-generation Drill charge M41. Notice the stamped “Ø” indicating a drill charge.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="615" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14990" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5-300x264.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/014-5-600x527.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Blank Hand Bomb M/41 with a 30 gram (1.058 oz) black powder charge. The white to the left is from 1942 and the grey to the right is from 1956. Notice the paper covering the exhaust holes in the fuse indicating that the fuse is live.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Hand Bomb/Hand Grenade Model 1923 (Blind)</strong></p>



<p>A Blind Hand Bomb and Hand grenade M23 made from wood and steel were also used but no pyrotechnics were involved and it was only used to practice throwing an object with similar weight and shape as the live ones. It has a steel plate in each end. The plate on top has the word “OP” (UP) stamped, and a steel button is protruding from the side simulating the safety interrupter. The Blind Hand Bomb M23 weighs 350 grams (12.345 oz) and measures 10.5 cm (4.133 inch) long and 5.7 cm (2.244 inch) wide. The Blind Hand Grenade M23 weighs 650 grams (22.928 oz) and measures 10.5 cm (4.133 inch) long and 6.5 cm (2.559 inch) wide. The blind is painted white for ease of spotting and recovering in the terrain. Other versions are known to exist and cheap ones have been observed also made from wood but they had a 4 cm (1.57 inch) broad and 5 mm (0.1969 inch) thick iron ring attached to the body with a bolt that doubles as the interrupter knob. The grenades were painted silver grey.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="572" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14991" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3-300x245.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/015-3-600x490.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Blind Handbomb M23 to the left and the Hand Grenade M23 to the right: both made from wood and steel.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The M23 and its variants have been obsolete for many years now. Exactly how many were used during World War II is unknown although a good portion certainly were used by the resistance movement. Unfortunately the Germans took over the production during the occupation and adopted it in the Wehrmacht and gave it the nomenclature respectively “Handgranaten 342(d) and 343(d).”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="483" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-14992" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4-300x207.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/016-4-600x414.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Blind Hand Bomb M/23 and Hand Grenade M23. (Illustration: Flådens og Kystdefentionens Håndvåben og Maskinskyts, Copenhagen 1942)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V12N6 (March 2009)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
