<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>M1903 &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/m1903/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 05:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Sordid Tale of of World War I’s Burnt M1903 Springfield Receivers</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-sordid-tale-of-of-world-war-is-burnt-m1903-springfield-receivers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Dickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metalurgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ordnance Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ordnance Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=46956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By W. Jim Dickson In World War I, the U.S. discovered that some of the low numbered M1903 Springfield receivers had burst because the metal had been burned by overheating it in manufacture. It was heated to the point that it was white hot with sparks coming out and held at that temperature long enough [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By W. Jim Dickson</em></p>



<p>In World War I, the U.S. discovered that some of the low numbered M1903 Springfield receivers had burst because the metal had been burned by overheating it in manufacture. It was heated to the point that it was white hot with sparks coming out and held at that temperature long enough to burn most all the carbon out of the steel, leaving it porous where the carbon had burned out, very fragile, and brittle. When reading the description of this event in Hatcher&#8217;s Notebook, and the Army&#8217;s solution of going to temperature-controlled furnaces, one could get the impression that this problem was caused by judging the temperature by eye. Neither General Hatcher nor the Army Ordnance Department were experienced blacksmiths, though. As an experienced blacksmith of many years, I would like to set the record straight.</p>



<p>BURNING METAL</p>



<p>You harden metal at a cherry red heat. You burn metal at a white-hot heat with sparks coming off the metal as the carbon is burned out. It takes a little bit of time for it to burn out, also. There is a big heat difference between cherry red and white-hot, just as there is a big difference between the color of cherry red and white with sparks coming out. I would trust a careful apprentice to quench metal at cherry red. For an experienced blacksmith to burn metal is almost unheard of, and for him not to know that he had done it is not possible. To do this on multiple receivers is nothing but deliberate sabotage. Somebody was mad about something and taking it out on the work. There is just no other possibility.</p>



<p>It’s likely that Ordnance realized this while also recognizing a public scandal might ensue if news of failure were reported in the newspapers. It would be a scandal that could hurt the careers of all the men in charge of Ordnance, as well as destroying a lot of the confidence that the Army (and the public) had in the Ordnance Department. Better to quietly correct the problem and get temperature controls on the furnaces so they could blame the lack of them for the problem instead of causing a scandal.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46960" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/M1903-Springfield-IMG_1160-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The final form of the M1903 Springfield was the M1903A3, shown here with all its accessories. It had the nickel steel receiver that the Springfield should’ve used from the rifle’s inception. (Jim Dickson)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Then again, it’s also possible that Ordnance never understood this, as their heat treatment of the receivers was the same as hardening a file. They wanted the glass smooth action of the Krag rifle and touted the great strength of file-hardened metal under a load but ignored the extreme brittleness of said metal under a sudden shock. Any good blacksmith could have told them this was a very bad idea.</p>



<p>Except for files, I’ve never hardened anything without tempering it, which is reheating it to anything from a straw yellow to a blue, the latter color being used for springs, knives, razors, and axes. Some folks have complained that the receivers of Mauser rifles were too soft. Well, they didn&#8217;t break or give trouble in over 100 years of hard service, and they have successfully been re-barreled for every cartridge that will fit through the action. Softer is better for sudden shock loads, such as those you get with a ruptured cartridge case… which will burst the file hardened receivers of the low numbered Springfield rifles.</p>



<p>BURSTING SPRINGFIELDS</p>



<p>The problem surfaced with the poor-quality ammunition that came out in WWI when Ordnance reported that their ammunition was getting worse. Soft brass and erratic loading of powder (with some loads that exceeding the 70,000 PSI army proof load) coupled with the fact that the last part of a cartridge case projects out over an eight of an inch (specifically 0.147 to 0.1485-inch) on a Springfield or M98 Mauser rifle is a formula for ruptured cartridge cases. When that happens, the brittle, file-hard receivers of the low number Springfield rifles burst. If the steel was burnt, it had very little strength; it burst even quicker.</p>



<p>THE FIX</p>



<p>Between 1917 and 1929, there were 61 cases of receivers blowing up. Attempts to reheat treat the receivers met with inconsistent results because often the steel used did not meet the specifications for composition. Ordnance finally gave up trying to repair the faulty receivers. They pivoted and made some good receivers that were hardened AND tempered, calling them double heat treated, and then went to nickel steel. During this time, some low numbered receivers got mixed in with the new, safe receivers… the cut-off date for manufacturing the old glass-hard receivers was not exactly recorded. How many ways can they screw up!? After thoroughly investigating the problem, Ordnance wanted to scrap ALL of the old receivers and replace them with updated, safe ones, but the money for this was never appropriated.</p>



<p>In their attempt to copy the M98 Mauser and call it an American invention (so that they wouldn&#8217;t catch the flak they had caught over previously adopting the Norwegian Krag rifle) Ordnance succeeded in making the only M98 variant that had its receivers blow up!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="696" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903-1024x696.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-46961" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903-1024x696.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903-300x204.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903-768x522.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903-750x510.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903-1140x775.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Soldiers-Training-with-M1903.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">New recruits train with the M1903 rifle at Camp Wadsworth, South Carolina during the spring of 1918. Image: (National Archives and Records Administration)</figcaption></figure>



<p>SAFETY, STOCK, AND SIGHT ISSUES</p>



<p>Ordnance also apparently didn&#8217;t appreciate that the thumb notch cutout on the left side of the M98 receiver was there as a last line of defense to protect the shooter&#8217;s eyes by diverting the gas from a pierced primer or ruptured cartridge case. They coupled the cocking knob from the Krag rifle with a 13-inch length-of-pull stock that resulted in some soldiers seriously injuring their eye on the cocking piece when rapidly working the bolt. Most soldiers learned to either move their head way back or drop the rifle from their shoulder when working the bolt.</p>



<p>In the British gun trade, rifle stocks are custom fitted to the shooter&#8217;s individual measurements to a sixteenth of an inch in all directions. A 13-inch length-of-pull is for people 4-and-a-half feet tall and shorter. That&#8217;s the average height of a 10-year-old. To make a soldier&#8217;s rifle stock that short is insane. The M1928A1 Thompson submachine gun had a 15-inch length-of-pull and was universally lauded for its extraordinary handling qualities.</p>



<p>Mauser rifles came with a “V” rear sight and an inverted “V” front sight. This front sight has a broad base that easily catches the eye in low light and a narrow top enabling minute-of-angle groups. It’s a rugged arrangement and can stand alone with no protection. In the U.S., Ordnance had long favored a narrow blade that needed a hood or side-mounted wings to protect it. A blade hood cuts down light on the sight, making it hard to see in low light. As a result, later rifles with protective side wings on the front sight sometimes had soldiers sighting on the wing instead of the blade in the hurried stress of combat.</p>



<p>Despite these shortcomings, the M1903 Springfield rifle series became one of the most respected and loved rifles in U.S. military history, even serving iron-sighted snipers in the Vietnam War some 70 years after the rifle’s introduction. It&#8217;s just a shame that it had to go through these unnecessary problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guns Of The Silver Screen: V23N3</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/guns-of-the-silver-screen-v23n3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V23N3 (Mar 2019)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2019]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun that Made the Twenties Roar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns of the Silver Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. J. Abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jovan Adepo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903A3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overlord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V23N3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyatt Russell]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Kyle Shea The Guns of “Overlord” On June 5, 1944, Nazi Germany was in control of most of France. The French people lived in fear of the brutal German soldiers who occupied their country. But there was hope. The French Resistance, also known as the Maquis, caused the Germans endless setbacks. In the east, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong><em>By Kyle Shea</em></strong></p>



<div style="height:50px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p class="has-large-font-size"><strong>The Guns of “Overlord”</strong></p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p class="has-drop-cap">On June 5, 1944, Nazi Germany was in control of most of France. The French people lived in fear of the brutal German soldiers who occupied their country. But there was hope. The French Resistance, also known as the Maquis, caused the Germans endless setbacks. In the east, millions of Soviet soldiers prepared to charge across Eastern Europe, drawing large numbers of German resources to the Eastern Front. In the south, Italy had switched sides, and the Germans found themselves in a second front against American and English soldiers. Finally, across the English Channel, a powerful force created German Chancellor Adolf Hitler’s worst nightmare: a Third Front.</p>



<p>In England, an alliance including the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, Poland and other nations amassed a large military force and were prepared to launch a great offensive to liberate Western Europe. While the German command was distracted by a fake army miles away, thousands of Marines, paratroopers, pilots, other soldiers and equipment were prepared for battle. The date for the offensive was supposed to have happened on June 5, but the weather forced them to change it to the next day. So on June 6, 1944, one of the greatest invasions in history began. Just after midnight, thousands of American, British and Canadian paratroopers landed across northern France, causing chaos for the Germans stationed there. This was D-Day, the first day of Operation Overlord. This was a campaign to invade Fortress Europe, liberate northern France and open the door to enter the heart of Nazi Germany. On August 24, American and French soldiers entered Paris. “Operation Overlord” officially ended on August 30, with Canadian troops entering Rouen to cheering crowds.</p>



<p>On November 9, 2018, “Overlord” was released in the United States. The movie tells the fictional story of a group of American paratroopers dropped behind German lines on D-Day. They stumble upon a secret German facility experimenting on human beings with a strange serum. The film was produced by J. J. Abrams and stars Jovan Adepo from the new “Star Wars” movies and Wyatt Russell, son of Kurt Russell.</p>



<p>The Allies used a number of different firearms, but the following are the ones that were used in the movie.</p>



<div style="height:10px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="210" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-284.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-23324" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-284.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-284-300x90.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/001-284-600x180.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><strong>The M1 Thompson is the final simplified variant of the famous “Gun that Made the Twenties Roar.” It was used on both the European and Pacific Fronts of the war. It fired .45 ACP from either a 20- or 30-round magazine at a rate of 800 rounds per minute. There were drums made for the M1928A1 version, but nobody used them in battle because they made the gun heavier than it needed to be, and they would not work in the M1 Thompson.</strong></figcaption></figure></div>



<div style="height:25px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="153" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-286.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-23325" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-286.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-286-300x66.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/002-286-600x131.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><strong>The M1918A2 Browning Automatic Rifle (known as the BAR) is one of the earliest automatic rifles in history. It was created as the M1918 to help American Doughboys in the trenches of World War II. Despite it weighing a lot and the magazines carrying limited ammunition, it was used in countless wars until the 1980s. It fired .30-06 from a 20-round magazine at a rate of 500 rounds per minute.</strong></figcaption></figure></div>



<div style="height:25px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="353" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-269.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-23326" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-269.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-269-300x151.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/004-269-600x303.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><strong>The Colt 1911 is one of the greatest pistols of all time. It was first adopted in 1911 by the United States Army and saw service through World War I, World War II, The Korean War, the Vietnam War and is still in use today. It shoots .45 ACP from a 7-round magazine. A Springfield manufactured model of the gun is also in the movie.</strong></figcaption></figure></div>



<div style="height:25px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p>M1903 Springfield Rifle is one of America’s most successful rifles. It was adopted in 1903 in response to the mixed performance of the Krag-Jorgensen Rifle. The M1903 first saw service in World War I and did well in the trenches. Even after the American Armed forces adopted the M1 Garand, the M1903 and other variants of the gun served on until the Vietnam War.</p>



<p>The M1903 in the “Overlord” movie is actually a variant of the rifle called the M1903A4. The main differences between the M1903 and M1903A3 guns are that the sights on the A3 were moved to the rear of the receiver, some of the parts are stamped, and many had two-groove barrels. The main difference on the M1903A4 is its sights were removed and replaced with mounts for a sniper scope. While it was a good infantry rifle, it did comparatively poorly as a sniper rifle. The gun holds five .30-06 rounds in an internal magazine like other bolt-action rifles and has a range of 1000m or more.</p>



<p>One of the most famous weapons of World War II was the M1 Garand. It was first produced in 1934 and saw service in dozens of conflicts across the world. It loads eight .30-06 (7.62x63mm) rounds that are loaded into the gun through the top using a clip. One problem the gun had was that the clip would cause a ping sound when it injected with the last round. Despite this minor flaw, the M1 Garand was a good rifle and was well liked by the soldiers who carried it.</p>



<p>Another rifle made famous in World War II was the M1 Carbine. It was produced for officers and tank crews, as well as paratroopers. From a distance, it looks like a lighter version of the M1 Garand. It shoots .30 Carbine (7.62x33mm) from 15- and 30-round magazines, with the M2 full-auto version at a rate of 750 rounds per minute. It was very light and had a range of 300 yards. There was actually a special M1A1 variant which had a folding buttstock for paratroopers. Sadly, that is not the model that was used in the movie.</p>



<p>The story behind the M1 Carbine is interesting. The gas piston was designed by David “Carbine” Williams, who had been sent to jail for the murder of a deputy. However, he showed such a talent for mechanical engineering that even the widow of the deputy who was killed agreed to his release to help serve his country.</p>



<div style="height:25px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="179" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-281.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-23327" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-281.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-281-300x77.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/003-281-600x153.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><strong>The Germans in the film use Sturmgewehr 44s, one of the first assault rifles in the world. Hitler refused to allow this gun to be made at first, but over time, he warmed up to the gun, especially after seeing it do well in the field. It shoots 8mm Kurz (7.62x33mm) from a 30-round magazine at a rate of 600 rounds per minute. It is a great gun that is easy to shoot, and if it had been introduced earlier in the war, it could have help the Germans win the conflict.</strong></figcaption></figure></div>



<div style="height:50px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="400" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-240.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-23328" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-240.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-240-300x171.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/005-240-600x343.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><strong>Walther P38 was made to replace the Luger pistol and has become a staple of Nazi bad guys in film. It saw action not only in World War II but saw service in a number of other nations and conflicts. It is a light pistol that shoots a 9mm Parabellum (9x19mm) from an 8-round magazine. Production of the gun stopped after World War II, but it was redesigned in the 50’s as the P1 and was in service until the 1990s.</strong></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>I did not see “Overlord,” but from what I heard, the movie was well-received from critics. If movies like “Overlord” are your cup of tea, by all means go enjoy this film.</p>



<p>Special Note: June 6, 2019, will be the 75th anniversary of the D-Day invasion. There will be ceremonies throughout Normandy, and it is likely that this will be the last time for many of the real soldiers who took part in it to be there. I have signed up for a tour and will be there to report on it. If you have any interest in going, it would be a good idea to start looking into it now.</p>



<div style="height:50px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V23N3 (March 2019)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. SERVICE WEAPONS USING .30-06</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/u-s-service-weapons-using-30-06/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1 (Oct 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benet-Mercie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Ordnance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Swebilius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chauchat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Model 1895]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Vickers M1915]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranston Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN-D BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Hammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henri Mercie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotchkiss Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotchkiss Portative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isaac Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Browning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krag-Jorgensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Benet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1905]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1917A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919A6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlin Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Model 1889]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Model 1900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin M Johnson Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meuse-Argonne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model of 1914]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model of 1917]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Westinghouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pattern 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potato Digger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert G. Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sac-Lowell Shops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Maxim Model of 1904]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vickers Sons & Maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner & Swasey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert G. Segel, Frank Iannamico &#38; Dan Shea U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903 The U.S. M1903 Rifle was designed and adopted to replace the Krag-Jorgensen rifle and its .30-40 cartridge. Adopted on June 19, 1903, the M1903 Rifle was chambered for the Model of 1903, .30 Government Cartridge (.30-03), which had a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Robert G. Segel, Frank Iannamico &amp; Dan Shea</strong></em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="190" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11575" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104-300x81.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104-600x163.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. M1903 Rifle was designed and adopted to replace the Krag-Jorgensen rifle and its .30-40 cartridge. Adopted on June 19, 1903, the M1903 Rifle was chambered for the Model of 1903, .30 Government Cartridge (.30-03), which had a 220-grain round-nose projectile. The Model of 1903 Rifle was only in service a short period of time before some changes were made. One of the most prominent upgrades was the rechambering for the improved Model of 1906 cartridge, which had a lighter, spitzer-type projectile and an improved powder. A newly designed M1905 rear sight was also added. The rifles were manufactured by Springfield Armory and Rock Island Arsenal from 1903 until 1914. Production was quickly resumed during 1917 with the U.S. entry into World War I.</p>



<p>The M1903 Rifle in .30-06 caliber remained the standard service weapon of the U.S. until the adoption of the M1 Rifle in 1936. During World War II, production of the M1 Garand was not able to keep up with the wartime demand. Thus, Remington Arms was awarded a contract to resume manufacture of the M1903 Rifle. During production, there were many new features implemented into the original design of the ’03 rifle to speed up production. These rifles were designated as the M1903 (Modified). Subsequently, more improvements were made resulting in the M1903-A3 model, which was adopted on May 21, 1942. The 03-A3 had many stamped parts, a new receiver mounted aperture rear sight and a longer hand guard. The L.C. Smith &amp; Corona Company was awarded a contract in February of 1942 to supplement production. The M1903 and its variants remained in service until declared obsolete on July 24, 1947.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="677" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11576" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147-300x290.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147-600x580.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. Maxim Model of 1904 was the first rifle caliber heavy machine gun approved for use as the standard service type by the U.S. Army in 1904. The Army was interested in the Maxim as early as 1887 and procured examples of the “World Standard” Maxim Model 1889 and Model 1900 for evaluation. After sporadic testing, the Chief of Ordnance finally gave approval for adoption in 1904. The first order for 50 guns and tripods were manufactured by Vickers, Sons &amp; Maxim (VSM) in England in the U.S. caliber .30-03.</p>



<p>The Ordnance Department wanted the gun to be made in the United States and enlisted Colt to manufacture the gun. Problems arose and it was several years before Colt could begin production. In the meantime, another forty guns were ordered from VSM. Colt finally began production in 1908. By 1908, the service cartridge had changed from the .30-03 to the .30-06. The ninety guns produced by VSM were all converted to the new service cartridge while all the Colt guns were manufactured in .30-06. Colt produced 197 guns, and with VSM’s 90 guns, total production of the Model of 1904 was 287 guns. Colt never produced any tripods. All the tripods were made by VSM and wheeled carriage mounts were produced by Rock Island Arsenal.</p>



<p>The Model of 1904 saw a brief service life, quickly being declared obsolete by 1915, yet was widely used and saw service in such distant outposts as the Philippines, Hawaii, Mexico, Central and South America. The gun never saw active combat service, particularly in World War I, being relegated to training purposes.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="311" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11578" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139-300x133.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139-600x267.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</strong></p>



<p>The Automatic Machine Rifle Model of 1909 is commonly referred to in the U.S. as the “Benet-Mercie.” Laurence Benet was an American engineer who worked for the Hotchkiss Company in Paris, France. He, along with another Hotchkiss engineer named Henri Mercie, collaborated to develop an air cooled, gas operated, lightweight machine gun based on the Hotchkiss Model 1900 heavy machine gun design. The Model 1909 differed from heavy machine guns in that it weighed just 30 pounds and was fitted with a wooden stock with elevation gear and a bipod. It was mechanically modified as to how the breech closed and the feedway and feed mechanism were changed. The gun also had a barrel changing ability, unique at that time. The number of parts to the gun were reduced to just twenty five.</p>



<p>The French adopted the French made Hotchkiss gun in 8mm Lebel and the British adopted it in .303. in 1909 and was known on the Continent as the “Hotchkiss Portative.” That same year, the U.S. Army, after lengthy trials, adopted it as service issue as the Automatic Machine Rifle Model of 1909 and ordered 29 guns from Hotchkiss. The Ordnance Department wanted the gun to be made in the U.S. The rights were secured and Colt and the Springfield Armory were contracted to produce the American version in .30-06. Over the next several years, both manufacturers combined produced approximately 670 guns. The Model of 1909 was issued for service with the Model of 1908 Warner &amp; Swasey telescopic musket sight, originally used for sharpshooter use with the Model 1903 Springfield rifle.</p>



<p>The Model of 1909 was issued to U.S. infantry and cavalry troops from 1909 to 1918 and saw limited tactical use in the landing at Vera Cruz in 1913, all along the Mexican border in 1916 and was used in the defense of Columbus, New Mexico against the sneak attack by Poncho Villa in 1916. Though the British and French “Hotchkiss Portative” version was widely used in World War I, the U.S. “Benet-Mercie” was relegated to training use. It was declared obsolete in 1918 and ultimately replaced by the far superior M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="568" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11581" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125-300x243.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125-600x487.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Model 1914 Colt Automatic Gun</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Model 1914 Colt Automatic Gun</strong></p>



<p>Invented and designed by John Browning, the Colt Model 1895 Automatic gun was the world’s first practical gas-actuated machine gun. Using a gas-impingement system that operated against a lever that traveled downward and backward in a 170-degree arc underneath the gun, it affectionately became known as “The Potato Digger.” Colt manufactured the gun and was extremely successful in selling the gun world wide in a variety of calibers. The U.S. Navy purchased fifty guns in 1897 in 6mm Lee and another 150 guns in 1898. These guns were used as secondary armament on ships and with naval landing parties and with the U.S. Marines. The gun was also used with some degree of success in the Philippines, the Boxer Rebellion, Mexican border war and the Spanish-American War.</p>



<p>The U.S. Army ordered 100 guns for testing and training in .30-40 Krag. Upon the recommendation of a joint Army-Navy board of 1898 for standardizing arms and ammunition, the Navy rechambered their 6mm Lee to .30-40 Krag, and then they all were changed to .30-03 and ultimately to .30-06. Though the Army, Navy and Marines all used the Colt Model 1895; only the Navy officially adopted the weapon. The Army just continued to buy it commercially as they deemed necessary eventually buying 2,800 guns during World War I. The “Model” designation was a name used by Colt and did not represent acceptance as issue by the Army.</p>



<p>In 1914, Colt modified the Model of 1895 by replacing the heavy, thick permanent barrel with a finned barrel that was easily changeable and became the Model of 1914. It was this version and its variants that ultimately saw use in World War I by a number of Allied nations though relegated as secondary armament and training by the U.S. The gun was used with three types of tripods, basically differing only in height.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="636" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11582" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103-300x273.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103-600x545.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. began to realize how vastly under-armed in automatic weapons it was and started a new series of tests in 1913 and field trials in 1914. The new, improved version of the Maxim gun, now called the Vickers, was the clear winner. The new British Vickers was redesigned internally to maximize space within the receiver box by inverting the toggle joint and lock, and the overall weight of the gun was substantially reduced; all without sacrificing reliability. In 1915, the Board of Ordnance unanimously approved the type for the Army as the Model of 1915 chambered for the .30-06 cartridge. They immediately placed an order for 125 guns to be made by Colt and in 1916 placed an additional order for 4,000 even though the first order had not yet even been made. When the U.S. entered World War I in April, 1917, not a single Colt Vickers M1915 had been delivered due to production problems at Colt.</p>



<p>Colt made Vickers guns finally became available in late 1917. By mid 1918, Colt Vickers started to be shipped overseas. The first twelve divisions arriving in France were issued the French Hotchkiss Model of 1914. The next ten divisions that sailed for France in May and June of 1918 were equipped with the Colt Vickers. By August, 1918, thirteen divisions were using the Colt Vickers. In all, 12,125 Vickers Model of 1915 ground guns were produced by Colt.</p>



<p>At the end of World War I, the remaining inventory of Colt Vickers were put into storage and held in reserve. They were ultimately sent to Great Britain under Lend-Lease to help guard against German invasion during World War II, especially after the huge losses of equipment at Dunkirk, while British production fought to rearm the British Army. After World War II, the U.S. did not want the guns returned and the British destroyed the remaining inventory.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11583" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>John Browning continued to experiment with different machine gun designs after the introduction of his first machine gun, the Model of 1895 Automatic Gun. He developed a short-recoil, water-cooled gun in 1900 and patented it in 1901. There was no government interest in this prototype and he ceased work on it until 1910 when he made further modifications and improvements to it. Again, there was no governmental interest in the gun.</p>



<p>As the U.S. was being drawn into World War I, the Ordnance Board urgently requested designs for new machine guns. Browning took his heavy water-cooled machine gun along with his new Browning Automatic Rifle to be tested in February, 1917. Both guns tested exceptionally well and the BAR was ordered immediately. As war broke out, another official test occurred in May, 1917. The genius of John Browning shone through with the simplicity of design, reliability and ease of maintenance. Browning’s heavy machine gun was adopted as the Model of 1917 chambered for the .30-06 service cartridge and ordered into production with contracts being awarded to New England Westinghouse, Remington and Colt.</p>



<p>30,089 M1917 Brownings were sent to France before the war ended with 1,168 guns actually being used in the front lines. The first instance of combat usage was in September, 1918 in the battle of the Meuse-Argonne, where, in wet and muddy conditions, the new Browning guns performed exceptionally well with one company firing 10,000 rounds per gun.</p>



<p>The Browning M1917 was to replace the variety of machine guns in American use (British Mk I Vickers, U.S. Vickers Model of 1915 and French Hotchkiss Model of 1914) but the war ended two months later so the Browning actually saw limited use. Yet, Browning’s design was so brilliant that the M1917 and its subsequent variants soldiered on in the U.S. inventory for another fifty years.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="370" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11584" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54-600x317.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>Colonel Isaac Lewis began development of the Lewis gun in 1910 based upon a previous design by Samuel McClean. Lewis presented his gun for formal testing in 1912 to the Ordnance Board, which included a “stunt” by firing the gun from an airplane &#8211; the first time a machine gun had ever been fired from an aircraft. The Ordnance Board took a dim view of the “stunt” and during the rest of the trials took particular efforts to find fault with the gun and rejected it claiming it was no better than the already approved Model of 1909 Benet-Mercie.</p>



<p>Lewis then went to Europe where his gun was warmly received and went into production in 1913 at Armes Automatiques Lewis in Liege, Belgium and at the Birmingham Small Arms (BSA) Company in Birmingham, England. Belgium was soon overrun by Germany in 1914 and production continued at BSA who eventually produced 145, 397 Lewis guns during World War I in the British .303 caliber. The gun was widely used to great effect throughout the war.</p>



<p>Savage Arms Company of Utica, New York began producing Lewis guns for a Canadian contract in .303 and the U.S. Army procured 350 guns (in .303) for use in 1916 along the Mexican border. Nevertheless, the U.S. Army still harbored a grudge against Lewis and his gun that dated back to 1912. The U.S. Navy, however, held no such animosity and purchased 6,000 Lewis guns from Savage for the U.S. Marines chambered in .30-06 and it was designated as the Model of 1917. Upon arriving in France, the 5th Regiment of the Marines attached to the 2nd Division, who had been issued and trained with the Model of 1917, had their Lewis guns taken away and were issued the French Hotchkiss M1914 and Chauchat M1915 machine guns. The American .30-06 Lewis guns were turned over to the Aviation Services. The Army in due course purchased 2,500 M1917 Lewis guns but they relegated them to U.S. training. U.S. Model of 1917 Lewis guns saw little or no infantry combat during the war. After the war, the Army discarded the Lewis gun though the Navy and Marine Corps kept it in their inventory until the 1930s.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="217" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11587" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43-300x93.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43-600x186.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Marlin Machine Gun Model of 1917/1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Marlin Machine Gun Model of 1917/18</strong></p>



<p>As World War I heated up, orders for the Colt M1914 increased as well. Colt entered into an agreement with Marlin Arms Company on manufacturing the M1914. Marlin’s designer, Carl Swebilius, worked out an improvement to the operating system that changed Browning’s original “Gas Hammer” style lever action to a straight piston arrangement. The Marlin guns, with the exception of a small run of M1917 trainers, were no longer “Diggers,” the piston in tube arrangement ran along the bottom of the barrel and applied the energy to the bolt system.</p>



<p>This change made Browning’s system easier to adapt into aircraft and vehicles; thus, the M1917 and M1918 Marlin Aircraft Machine Gun designations, and the M1917 Marlin Tank Machine Gun designation. Unfortunately, changing to a straight line piston changed the impulse time and energy, and the early guns had trouble in extraction tearing case rims. Adjustments were made to the design, but not before negative publicity occurred. Marlin had taken the position that the ammunition the Army had did not have strong enough cases and the Army said that the Marlin guns had to work with ammunition that was fielded. In the end, the Marlin M1917 type guns were relegated to aircraft use where there was more control on ammunition quality. Some of the Marlin guns had aluminum radiators on the barrels similar to the Lewis M1917, but most had a bare barrel.</p>



<p>The Marlin M1917 and M1918 machine guns did see combat in U.S. use. During World War II, may were shipped to England for their naval defense.</p>



<p>There were an additional 2,816 of the Marlin Model 1917 that are virtually identical to the Model of 1914 “Potato Digger” made by Colt. These were for training in the U.S. Army, and the main difference was in the location of the belt feed opening.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="184" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11588" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29-300x79.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29-600x158.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>The U.S M1917 rifle was originally produced as the Pattern 14, .303 caliber “Enfield” for the British. Prior to the U.S. entry into World War I, the British negotiated several contracts with the U.S. firms of Remington, Winchester and Eddystone (a Remington subsidiary), to produce the P14. Collectively, 1.2 million of the Pattern 14 rifles were made from 1916 to 1917.</p>



<p>Upon the United States’ entry into World War I, the U.S. Army faced a service rifle shortage. With the British contracts completed, instead of having the companies retool for the M1903 rifle, the War Department decided to make a few design changes and rechamber the P14 to the U.S. M1906 rimless .30-06 round and the new rifle was ready for production. The U.S. M1917 rifle was officially adopted in April 1917. There were over 2.4 million manufactured from 1917 to 1919 at a cost of $26.00 per weapon.</p>



<p>When World War I ended, the M1917 rifles were prudently placed into storage, after having been rebuilt by various U.S. arsenals. When World War II broke out in Europe, the U.S. and her Allies again faced critical shortages of small arms. The M1917 rifles were pulled from storage and issued to rear echelon soldiers and for training. After the war in October, 1945, the U.S. Army declared the M1917 rifle obsolete. While the U.S. M1917 rifle was more utilitarian then glamorous, it did everything it was intended to do.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="212" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11589" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21-300x91.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21-600x182.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong></p>



<p>As the U.S. was being drawn into the First World War, the Ordnance Board met in May, 1917 to consider for adoption designs for light machine guns and automatic rifles. John Browning had been previously working on a gas-operated, magazine fed, true automatic rifle design and submitted it to the board. It was unanimously accepted by the Ordnance Board and requested that production begin immediately at Colt who had secured the rights. However, Colt was already at peak production and requested approval from the Board for delay in production while they built a new facility in Meriden, Connecticut. Due to the immediate need, the request was denied and the lead manufacturer became the Winchester Company.</p>



<p>The initial contract with Winchester called for 25,000 BARs. They were in full production by June, 1918 delivering 4,000 guns and in July were turning out 9,000 BARs. Colt and Marlin-Rockwell also began production shortly after Winchester got into full production.</p>



<p>By July of 1918, the BAR began to arrive in France and the first unit to receive them was the U.S. Army’s 79th Division and they immediately exchanged their woefully inadequate French M1915 Chauchat machine rifles with the new BAR and began training. In the September 1918 battle of the Meuse-Argonne, the BAR was used extensively. World War I only lasted another two months before ending in November, 1918. Thus, while the BAR was the state-of the-art weapon, it saw limited combat service. Nevertheless, the M1918 BAR was such a fine weapon that it remained as the standard U.S. service automatic rifle after the war and production continued after the war. Of the total 102,125 M1918 BARs produced, Winchester made 47,123, Marlin-Rockwell 39,002 and Colt 16,000.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="324" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11593" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18-300x139.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18-600x278.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. was ill-equipped when it entered World War I in 1917 and was particularly lacking in automatic weapons. With less than 1,100 automatic weapons in inventory, consisting of four types in two different calibers, these guns were needed in the U.S. for training the new army. When U.S. divisions arrived in France, they had no automatic weapons.</p>



<p>The French, at war since 1914, had an arms industry in full force. Thus, U.S. troops in eighteen divisions were issued the French Model 1914 Hotchkiss heavy machine gun and the Model 1915 Chauchat automatic rifle: both chambered in 8mm Lebel. The French quickly developed the Chauchat to fill the immediate wartime need of France and consisted of fabricated steel tubing of standard sizes and stampings. The only parts requiring extensive machining were the barrel and bolt. The long-recoil operation, cheap materials, unorthodox enclosed design and hurried production produced a gun that had poor reliability and worse accuracy. But, it was all that was available.</p>



<p>To help alleviate a two-cartridge supply nightmare, the U.S. asked the French manufacturer, C.S.R.G., to produce the gun in .30-06. Good idea, bad execution. The gun was simple in its design and conversion was easy: change the barrel, replace the semicircular magazine with a detachable box magazine, change the angle of the bipod and change the graduations on the rear sight. However, the already poor reliability of the gun went from bad to worse.</p>



<p>The more powerful, straight cased, rimless .30-06 cartridge was very difficult to extract. With its violent action, the M1918 Chauchat tore the cartridges instead of extracting them and the more powerful .30-06 caused major stress on all the working parts causing failures. Additionally, the gun heated up very quickly causing the action to freeze until it had cooled. Due to the enclosed design, clearing stoppages and jams was almost impossible. The gun, in a single word, was awful.</p>



<p>The U.S. nevertheless quickly adopted it as the Chauchat Model of 1918 and bought and paid for 25,000; taking delivery of 19,241. There is no record of M1918s being used in combat and were relegated to training use. They were so bad, that immediately after the war, the U.S. ordered them to be destroyed.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="654" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11594" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13-300x280.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13-600x561.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</strong></p>



<p>In the rush to supply American troops in World War I, deficiencies in design and manufacturing methods of the Model of 1917 manifested itself quickly in operational use. Many of the problems stemmed from the lack of, or improper heat treating of, key internal parts that included the bolt, barrel extension, accelerator, firing pin, trigger and extractor. Inaccurate manufacturing tolerances also contributed to leaking water jackets at the muzzle cap. The most severe problem was due to the pounding of the breech lock on the breech lock cam causing cracks in the receiver side and bottom plates.</p>



<p>As early as 1919, steps were taken to remedy these problems; the most obvious being welding or riveting a “U” stirrup under the bottom plate and extending up each side of the receiver to strengthen the receiver box. A program was initiated by Rock Island Arsenal in 1936 to covert all Model of 1917 guns with upgrades. Changes included a large, new-manufactured reinforced bottom plate that extended up the sides of the receiver and riveted in place, a new belt feed lever, an improved top cover latch that also incorporated a hold open feature and a new rear sight graduated in yards for the M1 ball cartridge (original Model of 1917 sights were in meters). This improved version of the Model of 1917 was designated as the M1917A1. (The “Model of” designation for U.S. arms was dropped in 1939 and replaced with the letter “M”.)</p>



<p>During World War II, more changes occurred to the M1917A1 that included an improved bolt, the bronze end cap and trunnion replaced by steel, the steam tube assembly was strengthened and the rear leaf sight graduated for the now standard M2 ball cartridge. While almost all Model of 1917s were ultimately converted to the A1 specifications, production resumed from 1936 to 1945 with 55,859 M1917A1s being produced by Rock Island Arsenal.</p>



<p>The M1917A1 was used extensively in both theaters of operation during World War II and continued service throughout the Korean War and the beginning stages of Vietnam.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="263" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11595" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10-300x113.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10-600x225.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</strong></p>



<p>During the interwar period, many attempts were made to improve on the M1918 BAR. The M1918A1 and the M1922 were made in very small quantity, with the basic addition of a bipod being the most obvious change. In 1938-39, serious work was begun on what became the Browning Automatic Rifle, Model of 1918A2. The initial experiments with the bipod were expanded upon, and the bipod placement was moved to the front of the barrel utilizing a new flash hider to secure it. The bipod allowed full rotation of the barrel, which made up somewhat for the loss of traverse due to the forward location.</p>



<p>A second addition was that of a pistol grip which extends slightly below the trigger. The method of firing was changed from select fire, (semiautomatic and fully automatic) in the Model of 1918, to dual rate of fire in the Model of 1918A2. This rate reducing mechanism was initially based on the Belgian FN-D BAR trigger group but was later adapted to a US design. Magazine guides were also added to the front of the trigger guard. The fore end was shortened and a heat shield was added, all to help the cooling process. There was a hinged buttplate to add support from the operator’s shoulder, and the new buttstock design allowed for a monopod stock rest.</p>



<p>Production of the M1918A2 was initially performed by upgrading M1918 and M1918A1 BARs. M1918A2 new manufacturing was started in January of 1943. The M1918A2 BAR served in the US military forces throughout World War II, Korea, and well into the Vietnam War. M1918A2s are still seen in various inventories around the world, obsolete though they are.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="275" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11596" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10-300x118.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10-600x236.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</strong></p>



<p>The success of John Browning’s designs is evident in the proliferation of Browning machine guns used by U.S. and other forces around the world. The end of World War I and the advent of more mobile military forces led firearms designers to confront new problems of portability, and the use of tanks and aircraft compounded this. Browning’s basic design for the M1917 series had morphed from water-cooled to air-cooled as early as 1918, and the first models of 1919 Browning machine guns were basically for aircraft use.</p>



<p>The most prolific of the air-cooled Browning machine guns in rifle caliber was the M1919A4. This final variant was designed as either a flexible mount unit for tank use, or for mounting on the M2 tripod with traverse &amp; elevation mechanism and pintle. Production began with the adoption of the M1919A4 in 1935. At that time, all M1919A2 and other earlier variants were started onto a rebuild program to have the longer 24 inch heavy barrel as well as other modifications. By 1939 the elongated slots in the barrel jacket were changed to the quickly recognizable pattern of 5/8 inch diameter holes.</p>



<p>The M1919A4 served well into the Vietnam War for U.S. forces and is still in use today in various armies around the world, primarily in South and Central America and Africa, although most have been replaced with more modern weapons. The M1919A4 was fielded in .30-06, but it has been issued to various armies in 8mm Mauser, 7.62&#215;51 NATO, 7.65 Argentine, and others.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="234" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11597" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10-300x100.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10-600x201.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</strong></p>



<p>The Browning M1919A6 was conceived as a stop-gap measure to fill a void between the M1919A4 and the BAR. The BAR, while relatively light and portable, did not have the capability of sustained firepower. The M1919A4, while perfectly adequate, lacked the ability to be quickly set up and employed and still required the use of a tripod for stability.</p>



<p>The Infantry Board in 1942 investigated many light machine guns of the time, including the German MG42. While a number of designs were submitted, wartime shortages, production constraints and immediate need precluded the design and production of a superior weapon versus modifying a current production weapon to fill the need. (A bird in hand is better than two in the bush.) Reminiscent of Germany’s decision in World War I to develop a light machine gun from an already existing production gun (the MG08/15 from the MG08), the Infantry Board decided to make modifications to the Browning M1919A4 machine gun.</p>



<p>Beginning in 1943, the gun was standardized as the M1919A6 and featured a removable shoulder stock, a lighter barrel with a different barrel bushing to accommodate a bipod and was fitted with a carrying handle. The gun weighed 12.5 pounds lighter than the M1919A4 mounted on its M2 tripod, and was easily transportable and set up by one man. Other than these relatively minor modifications, the gun was mechanically identical to the M1919A4.</p>



<p>Production of the M1919A6 was by the Saginaw Steering Gear Division of General Motors, who produced 43,479 M1919A6s. A number of M1919A4s were also converted to the M1919A6 configuration. The gun saw wide service in the last two years of World War II and continued to see service through the Korean War and the early years of Vietnam.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="200" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11598" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6-300x86.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6-600x171.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</strong></p>



<p>Development of the M1 rifle began in 1919. Limited funds and the conflicting ideas of many of those involved caused the program to drag on until 1936, when a suitable prototype finally emerged. Original prototype rifles were chambered for a .276 caliber cartridge. However, the weapons were soon changed over to the existing, standard U.S. 30-06 round by order of General Douglas MacArthur. The decision was due in part to the large stockpiles of the ammunition that remained from the First World War. The basic M1 design was continually refined until 1940 when large-scale production finally began.</p>



<p>The gas operated, semiautomatic M1 rifle was the inspiration of John C. Garand, who designed the weapon while employed by the Springfield Armory. During World War II, the M1 rifle was manufactured by Springfield Armory and the Winchester Repeating Arms Company. Approximately 4,040,802 M1 rifles were manufactured from 1937 to 1945. The remarkable M1 design was to have a service life extending long past the conclusion of World War II.</p>



<p>In 1950, the outbreak of hostilities in Korea brought the World War II M1 out of pending retirement. A dwindling supply of rifles dictated that additional M1s would be needed and production resumed. During the Korean Conflict M1 rifles were manufactured by International Harvester, Harrington &amp; Richardson and the Springfield Armory. During the1950s era, approximately 1,427,970 additional M1 rifles were produced, and many more WWII era rifles refurbished. The last M1 rifle was manufactured in 1957.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="135" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11599" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4-300x58.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4-600x116.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2</strong></p>



<p>Immediately following World War I, experiments began on making a high speed air-cooled Browning machine gun variant for aircraft use. The original high speed guns were designed by Colt, and these included the M1918, M1918A1, M1919, and MG40. Each model had its problems, leading to the next variant. Part of the problem was that in going to the newer more powerful M2 .30-06 service cartridge, the cyclic rates went up by percentages in the 20% range. At 1,000 rpm, problem occurrences were magnified.</p>



<p>The final variant of the high speed Browning machine gun is commonly referred to as the “Aircraft Gun” or the “M2”. The prefix “AN” simply stands for “Army-Navy.” There were two basic models of the M2: Fixed or Flexible. The M2 Fixed gun was forward firing only, mounted in the wings or cowling, for remote firing by the pilot on an aircraft. The M2 Flexible gun had a spade grip assembly and was mounted so that an air gunner could engage targets within his traverse area.</p>



<p>The M2 guns were designed so that they could be switched out for feeding from either the right or left sides. This also allowed for the use of a twin mount. Twin M2 Browning machine guns firing at 1,200 rpm each made for a very impressive increase in hit probability in air battles.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="219" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11600" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3-300x94.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3-600x188.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The M1941 Johnson Rifle</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The M1941 Johnson Rifle</strong></p>



<p>Designed by Melvin M. Johnson, Jr., the M1941 Johnson was unique for a rifle caliber semiautomatic weapon because it was recoil operated rather than the more commonly used gas operating system. This unique feature made the Johnson rifle easy to manufacture and less prone to gas fouling. The weapon also featured a 10 round rotary magazine that could be topped off with additional rounds. The nomenclature M1941 was a commercial designation as there were no Johnson rifles manufactured under U.S. contracts.</p>



<p>The Johnson Automatics Company subcontracted with the Universal Windings Company to manufacture the weapon at their factory complex located in Cranston, Rhode Island. The company would be known as the Cranston Arms Company. Approximately 30,000 Johnson Rifles were manufactured before production ceased in early 1943.</p>



<p>Although the Marine Corps had chosen the M1 Garand, few M1 rifles were available as wartime demand far exceeded the supply. One feature of the Johnson rifle that the Marines liked was it could be easily broken down. This was considered an asset for their newly formed “Paramarine” battalions where the rifles could be easily carried when disassembled. The Marines procured a limited number of the Johnson rifles for issue to the 1st Parachute Battalion in 1942.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="334" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11601" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1-300x143.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1-600x286.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</strong></p>



<p>Invented and designed by Melvin M. Johnson, Jr., it was his intent that the M1941 Johnson LMG replace the BAR. Despite the light machine gun designation, it really was an automatic rifle like the BAR. Notwithstanding the name game, the M1941 LMG had many unique features. Chambered for the M2 .30-06 cartridge, it had a straight line stock which decreased muzzle rise during full automatic fire; necessitating a high front sight. It was light weight at only about 13 pounds and was very accurate in the semiautomatic mode as it fired from a closed bolt, yet in full automatic mode, fired from an open bolt to assist in cooling and preventing cook-offs from a hot barrel. The magazine well was also unique in that the 20-round box magazine could be topped-off by the addition of single rounds through the right side of the receiver or by five round stripper clips. Additionally, the feed lips were a machined part of the receiver rather than being part of the magazine and thus not subject to deformation. The M1941 LMG also employed a quick change barrel.</p>



<p>The M1941 Johnson light machine gun was never officially adopted by the U.S. but was used by selected units of the Marines and Army. Because BARs were in short supply, the U.S. Marines obtained a small quantity of M1941 LMGs primarily intended for use by airborne units and Marine Raiders which saw combat use in the South Pacific. The Army also acquired some M1941 LMGs for issue to the Army’s First Special Service Force, the OSS and there are unconfirmed reports that they were also used by some Army Rangers.</p>



<p>Though some 10,000 M1941 LMGs were produced by Cranston Arms Company, only a relative few (less than 3 percent) were used by the U.S. with the bulk originally ordered by the Dutch for use in the Dutch East Indies. At the fall of the Dutch East Indies to the Japanese, the remaining guns of the contract were embargoed so as not to fall into Japanese hands and is the reason a number of guns were available to the U.S. as needed.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="189" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11602" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1-300x81.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1-600x162.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</strong></p>



<p>The .30 caliber M37 machine gun was a post World War II machine gun variation designed as a secondary weapon for use on combat vehicles and tanks. The M37 differed from the M1919A4 in that it could be fed from either the right or left side by repositioning of a few parts. The top cover also had a new type latch that could be opened from either side. The M37 was generally used as a fixed tank weapon, but was also utilized in the flexible role, primarily by the U.S. Marine Corps. When used in the flexible role, rear sights were added and the weapon was used on the M2 tripod. Among other improvements, the M37 featured a chromed trunnion block, barrel and booster. Many of the parts of the M37 were redesigned and not readily interchangeable with the M1919A4 machine gun. Rock Island Arsenal and Saco-Lowell Shops manufactured the M37 machine gun from 1953 to 1969. The M37C variation was similar to the M37, but used an electric solenoid to fire the weapon, and rather than manually charged, it used a hydraulic system to perform the task. The M37C was used in early helicopter applications, as well as being fitted in the U.S. M48 and M60 tanks.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1903</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Bolt action<br>Overall length: 43.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches, twist right hand 1 turn in 10 inches<br>Weight: 8.69 pounds<br>Magazine: Integral, 5 round capacity<br>Sights: Front: blade.<br>Rear: M1903 ladder type, M1903-A3 stamped, aperture type .<br>Production: Pre-WWII approximately 1,704,779. During WWII 1,415,593<br>Manufacturers:<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;World War I: (M1903) Springfield Armory, Rock Island Arsenal.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;World War II: (M1903-A4) Remington Arms, L.C. Smith &amp; Corona</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 30 lbs.<br>Overall length: 48.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 25.1 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 400 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 30-round metal feed strip<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,800 yards Warner &amp; Swasey M1908 telescopic sight<br>Production: 670<br>Manufacturer: Colt, Springfield Armory</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil with muzzle gas assist<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 32.5 lbs. Tripod: 50 lbs.<br>Overall length: 43 inches<br>Barrel length: 28 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round cloth belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 12,125<br>Manufacturer: Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1904</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil with muzzle gas assist<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 57.5 lbs. Tripod: 80 lbs.<br>Overall length: 44 inches<br>Barrel length: 28.5 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 287<br>Manufacturer: Vickers, Sons &amp; Maxim, Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>M1914 Colt Automatic Gun</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas impingement system<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 35 lbs. Tripod: 56 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41 inches<br>Barrel length: 28 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 400 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round cloth belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 25,000<br>Manufacturer: Colt, Marlin-Rockwell</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 25.5 lbs. Bipod: 3 lbs.<br>Overall length: 51 inches<br>Barrel length: 26.5 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 47-round rotating pan magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade protected by ears.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,100 yards<br>Production: 8,500<br>Manufacturer: Savage Arms Co.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 30 lbs. Tripod: 53 lbs.<br>Overall length: 38.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,800 meters<br>Production: Approximately 72,000. Wartime 42,750<br>Manufacturer: New England Westinghouse, Remington, Colt.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Bolt-action<br>Overall length: 46.25 inches<br>Barrel length: 26 inches, twist: left hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 9.187 pounds<br>Magazine: 5 rounds integral box type<br>Sights: Front: protected blade<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable ladder sight<br>Production: Approximately 2.4 million<br>Manufacturers: Remington, Winchester, Eddystone</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, semiautomatic, long-recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 19 lbs.<br>Overall length: 45.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 17 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 300 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 16-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: V-notch tangent<br>Production: 19,241<br>Manufacturer: C.S.R.G. (Chauchat, Sutter, Ribeyrolle &amp; Gladiator</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Marlin Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917/18</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated straight piston<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 25.0 lbs.<br>Overall length: 40 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 600 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front and rear sights varied by model and application. Ground guns had similar sights to theColt M1914. Other mountings used a variety of aircraft and anti-aircraft sights.<br>Production: 1917 (Navy): 1,605; 1917/18<br>Aircraft: 38,000<br>Manufacturer: Marlin Arms Corporation, Marlin-RockwellCompany</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30,Model of 1918</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, semiautomatic, gas operation<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 15.5 lbs.<br>Overall length: 47 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable<br>Production: 102,125<br>Manufacturer: Winchester, Marlin-Rockwell, Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 33 lbs. Tripod: 53 lbs.<br>Overall length: 38.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,600 yards.<br>Production: 55,859<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operation<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 19.4 lbs.<br>Overall length: 47.8 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 300-450/ 500-650 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable<br>Production: 249,380 total new production as A2<br>Manufacturer: New England Small Arms (NESA), 168,363; IBM Corporation, 20,017; Royal Typewriter Company, 61,000</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 32.5 lbs.<br>Overall length: 53 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Folding blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,600 yards.<br>Production: 43,479<br>Manufacturer: Saginaw Steering Gear Div. of General Motors</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2 Caliber: .30-06</strong><br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 23.0 lbs<br>Overall length: 39.9 inches<br>Barrel length: 23.9 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 1,200 rounds per minute<br>Feed: disintegrating links Sights: Varied according to mounting<br>Production: Brown-Lipe-Chapin 33,311; Buffalo<br>Arms Co. 96,822; Savage 14,800; Colt 49,681<br>Manufacturer: Brown-Lipe-Chapin Div. General Motors, Buffalo Arms Company, Savage Arms, Corporation. Colt’s Patent Firearms Mfg.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 31 lbs. Tripod: 14 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450-500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt or disintegrating links<br>Sights: Front: Folding blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,400 yards.<br>Production: RIA 31,596; Saginaw 367,853; Buffalo 38,300. Total production of all M1919A4 variants from 1939 to 1945: 441,494.<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal, Saginaw Steering Gear Div. of General Motors, Buffalo Arms Co</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Semiautomatic, gas operated<br>Overall length: 43.6-inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches, twist: right hand, 1 turn in 10 inches<br>Weight: 9.5 pounds<br>Magazine: 8 round enbloc clip<br>Sights: Front: Blade with protective ears<br>Rear: Aperture<br>Production: Approximately 5,468,772<br>Manufacturers: World War II: Springfield Armory, Winchester Korean War era: Harrington &amp; Richardson, International Harvester, Springfield Armory</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>M1941 Johnson Rifle</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Semiautomatic, short recoil operated<br>Overall length: 45.87 inches<br>Barrel length: 22 inches, twist: right hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 9.5 pounds<br>Feed: Internal rotary type, 10 round capacity<br>Sights: Front: blade with protective ears<br>Rear: aperture type, graduated in meters<br>Production: Approximately 30,000<br>Manufacturer: Cranston Arms Company</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full Automatic, semiautomatic, short recoil operated<br>Overall length: 42 inches<br>Barrel length: 22 inches, twist: right hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 13 pounds<br>Cyclic rate: 450 rounds per minute<br>Magazine: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: blade with protective ears<br>Rear: Folding aperture type, graduated in meters<br>Production: Approximately 10,000<br>Manufacturer: Cranston Arms Company</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 31 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41.75 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450-550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: Disintegrating links<br>Sights: Added for C Front: Folding blade<br>Added for C Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,400 yards.<br>Production: RIA 7,340; Saco, unknown<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal, Saco-Lowell Shops</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N1 (October 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE M 1903</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-m-1903/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1 (Oct 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[03A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Cutshaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cutshaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Hatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903A3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1917]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M73B1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privi Partizan 180-grain ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smith Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Remington Model 03A3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Charlie Cutshaw (Note: The M1903A4 depicted herein was unfired when purchased and came complete with original sling. The 82nd Airborne Division sniper is portrayed by Col. Tom Brown, USA (Ret), who spent several tours in the 82nd and in the 173rd Airborne Brigade in Vietnam. Col. Brown’s uniform and equipment are absolutely authentic for [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Charlie Cutshaw</strong></em></p>



<p><em>(Note: The M1903A4 depicted herein was unfired when purchased and came complete with original sling. The 82nd Airborne Division sniper is portrayed by Col. Tom Brown, USA (Ret), who spent several tours in the 82nd and in the 173rd Airborne Brigade in Vietnam. Col. Brown’s uniform and equipment are absolutely authentic for the fighting just after Normandy landings in 1944.)</em></p>



<p>The onset of World War II found the United States short of many weapons and military equipment, not the least of which was an infantry sniper rifle. Sniper rifles during World War I were converted from both M1903 and M1917 rifles, but between the wars sniping was neglected. Even after World War II began, sniping continued to be neglected and it wasn’t until January 1943 that the Army issued a directive to Remington Arms to set aside 20,000 M1903A3 receivers for conversion to sniper rifles.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="337" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-108.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11668" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-108.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-108-300x144.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-108-600x289.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>An 82nd Airborne Division sniper prepares to engage enemy in wooded terrain. Note the size of Weaver 330 commercial scope, bent bolt handle and lack of open sights. The Scope was easily damaged and once broken, the M1903A4 was virtually useless. The fragile scope was the rifle’s major weakness.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>There doesn’t seem to have been any formal accuracy requirements for the M1903A4; at least we couldn’t find any standards in any of the four reference books we consulted in preparing this article. According to noted martial arms historian Bruce Canfield, there was no special care taken in manufacturing the M1903A4 rifles and their accuracy was no better than standard service rifles. The trigger on our test rifle, for example, was the same as our standard Remington M1903A3 &#8211; hardly sniper grade with two stage 5.5 pound break and significant overtravel. There were other shortcomings, as well. Since no sights were fitted and the commercial Weaver telescopic sights were easily damaged, a damaged scope left the sniper with a very expensive club. Additionally, the scope was not moisture resistant, which was a real problem in the South Pacific campaigns. The Redfield “Junior” mount was nothing more than a commercial unit and the retaining screws reportedly loosened and fell out regularly, but replacements were difficult to obtain through the supply system. Moreover, the gross elevation of the Redfield mount was adjusted by inserting or removing shims. Initial windage was set by adjusting the large screws visible at the rear of the scope mount.</p>



<p>Whatever shortcomings it might have had, the M1903A4 was the only version of the M1903 to have been manufactured as a sniper rifle at the factory. All others were field conversions. The M1903A4 was intended as a stopgap until the M1 Garand could be redesigned as a sniper rifle, but in the end only a very few M1C sniper rifles saw action in World War II, while the M1903A4 was used in every theater of operation throughout the war.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-154.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11669" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-154.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-154-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-154-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Left side view shows the Redfield Junior mount and the Weaver 330 scope. According to historical reports, large screws at the rear that were used for gross windage adjustment shot loose and were difficult to find in the supply system. Note also small size of scope’s windage and elevation adjusting knobs. These appear to be very fragile and susceptible to damage or breaking.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>Because there was no way of predicting whether or not a M1903A3 being manufactured as an M1903A4 would deliver acceptable accuracy, all M1903A4s were marked, “US Remington Model 03A3,” but the markings were different from standard M1903A3s in that they were offset to the left so they would not be covered by the Redfield scope mount. The idea was that if the rifle wasn’t sufficiently accurate, open sights would be installed and the rifle issued as a standard M1903A3. Thus, there are no M1903A4s marked as such as far as we have been able to determine. We should also note that every M1903A4 was made by Remington. Smith Corona, the other M1903A3 manufacturer, did not make any M1903A4s.</p>



<p>Like all M1903A3s, the M1903A4 may be found with any number of variations. Most had four groove barrels, but some two groove barrels were fitted as is the case with our test rifle. According to Major General Julian Hatcher, probably the foremost authority on early to mid 20th century military small arms, the two groove barrel had little, if any, negative effect on accuracy. In the case of our test rifle, we have to agree, since it has a two groove barrel and delivered very good accuracy.</p>



<p>M1903A4 stocks were generally the Type C full pistol grip, but many, like our test example, were fitted with the semi-pistol grip “scant grip.” About the only constants were the lack of open sights, the unusual markings, the bolt handle that was forged with a concave shape to clear the telescopic sight and the stock notched to accommodate the non-standard bolt handle.</p>



<p>There were two telescopic sights used, both variants of the 2.5x Weaver 330. The first scopes were marked commercially and had either tapered post or crosshair reticles. Later scopes were marked M73B1, the military designation for the Weaver 330. Our test rifle was fitted with the tapered post version of the commercial 330, although our rifle’s serial number indicates that it was in the last production batch of 6,300 M1903A4s. The final M1903A4s were manufactured in June 1944 when the M1C started being delivered in sufficient numbers to begin replacing the M1903A4.</p>



<p>There seems to be disagreement among the M1903 authorities on total numbers of M1903A4s manufactured. According to Bruce Canfield and Clark Campbell, the number was 28,365. On the other hand, Lt. Col. William Brophy states that 29,964 were produced. We probably will never know with certainty just how many were manufactured, except that the M1903A4 represents a tiny fraction of the 1 million plus M1903A3 type rifles produced by Remington during World War II. When Smith Corona production is added to the mix, the total M1903A3 production rises to nearly 1.5 million. So it is clear that the M1903A4 is one of the rarest production M1903s ever made representing less than 2% of total production, which has driven prices into the $3,000+ range for a good example.</p>



<p>The M1903A4 soldiered on after World War II, despite M1C and M1D sniper rifles that supposedly replaced it. M1903A4s were drawn from storage for the Korean War and surprisingly also saw service in Vietnam during the early stages of that conflict before other, more modern sniper rifles could be procured, making the M1903A4 the last version of the M1903 to remain in military service. Thus, the M1903A4 saw military service for over 20 years, indicating that it must have had some positive attributes. Just how good was the M1903A4 for its intended purpose?</p>



<p>According to Lt. Col. Brophy, the M1903A4 was “&#8230;at best a poor excuse for a sniper rifle.” The M1903A4 had no special attention given to its accuracy or its suitability for use as a sniper rifle. The Weaver scope had the benefit of being cheap and available and little else other than being simple to install. But in the context of the time, the M1903A4 wasn’t really significantly inferior to sniper rifles from other nations. The Russian PU with its 3.5x scope was really no better, nor was the German 98K. The British Number 4, Mark 1(T) wasn’t either. All were essentially bolt action service rifles that were pressed into sniper service, except for a few 98Ks that were specially made up as sniper rifles. Consequently, the M1903A4 was not better or worse than other sniper rifles of the time. When compared to sniper rifles from the Vietnam era, the M1903A4 comes off as inferior but, for its time, it did its job and from what research we have been able to discover, did it relatively well.</p>



<p>Our test M1903A4 was unfired when we discovered it in a local gun store and purchased it at a very reasonable price. Since it was new, we were advised by some that the rifle should remain in unfired condition to preserve its collector value. Nevertheless, we do not own firearms that we do not shoot and so shortly after obtaining our M1903A4, we boresighted it and headed to the range to zero it. We zeroed the rifle using Black Hills 168-grain match grade ammunition, but for this evaluation we also tested the 03A4 with Greek 1985 production military M2 Ball, duplicating the World War II 150-grain military load. We also tested Serbian Privi Partizan 180-grain ammunition, imported by Wolf. The Black Hills match delivered 1.25 minute of angle (MOA) at 100 yards (1.25 inches at 100 yards). MOA (1 inch at 100 yards) accuracy is considered acceptable for modern sniper rifles, so the 03A4 &#8211; at least our 03A4 &#8211; gives up little to modern precision rifles in terms of accuracy. Surprisingly, the Greek 150-grain ball ammunition was as accurate as the Black Hills 168-grain match; probably because the M1903A3 was designed around the M2 ball round. The Serbian Privi Partisan was about 2 MOA. The bottom line is that our M1903A4 delivered acceptable accuracy which would probably improve once the barrel was broken in by having a couple of hundred rounds fired through it.</p>



<p>The M1903A4 is an excellent representation of sniper rifle technology of the 1940s. As we have mentioned, sniper rifles of both our allies and enemies were not superior to the 03A4 in any meaningful way and the rifle delivers good accuracy using quality modern match or service grade ammunition. World War II snipers didn’t have access to match grade ammo like their modern day counterparts, so the Greek ball ammunition test groups are probably more in keeping with 60+ year old reality. Probably the most significant shortfall of the M1903A4 was its scope, but it must be remembered that during World War II, everything was in short supply and the Army had to get its scopes from a company that could deliver the necessary quantities within a short time. The Weaver 330 was good enough for the task at hand. All in all, the M1903A4 was satisfactory for its intended purpose and, like most soldiers and Marines of the period, served its country well.</p>



<p>Everyone who shot our “old soldier” was overjoyed at being able to shoot a rare piece of American military history. We probably will not shoot our M1903A4 frequently, as it is too valuable for frequent trips to the range, but rest assured that it will continue to do what it was designed to do &#8211; shoot with reasonable accuracy from time to time and deliver some enjoyment in the process.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N1 (October 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ordnance Committee Meeting, 23 December 1943</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/ordnance-committee-meeting-23-december-1943/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 20:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N3 (Dec 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1919A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bazooka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browning Automatic Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese Pacific Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson automatic rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Machine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M9A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P-40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Ordnance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N3]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Frank Iannamico One of the US Ordnance Committee’s responsibilities was to “consider and recommend technical action upon all matters affecting material designed for, and to be issued to the armed forces, coming within the jurisdiction of the Ordnance Department”. Small arms of course were covered under this directive. The Ordnance Committee met regularly to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Frank Iannamico</strong><br><br><em>One of the US Ordnance Committee’s responsibilities was to “consider and recommend technical action upon all matters affecting material designed for, and to be issued to the armed forces, coming within the jurisdiction of the Ordnance Department”. Small arms of course were covered under this directive. The Ordnance Committee met regularly to discuss weapons and related subjects.<br><br>Marine Lt. Colonel V.H. Krulak was asked to attend an Ordnance Committee meeting that was held on 23 December, 1943, to give some feedback to the Committee on how some of the weapons were performing in the field. Colonel Krulak had just returned from fighting the Japanese in the Pacific Theatre, including Guadalcanal, the United States’ first major offensive operation of the war. Below is a transcript of that meeting, his comments on the performance of several weapons is very interesting.<br><br>Please note: The grammar and verbiage of the transcript has not been edited or corrected.</em><br><br><strong>Chairman of the Committee General Barnes:</strong> “Lt. Colonel V.H. Krulak, Marine Corps, has been in the South Pacific for 18 months, is back, and has agreed to talk to us this morning about some of his experiences. I know some of you probably have appointments, so you can consider the meeting adjourned, and those who wish to stay to hear Colonel Krulak’s remarks we would very much like to have you stay. Those who feel they must go, I suggest that you leave now so as not to disturb Colonel Krulak&#8230; I guess everybody wants to hear you Colonel, I don’t see any volunteers. We will turn the meeting over to Colonel Krulak”.<br><br><strong>Colonel Krulak:</strong> “Thank you General. I reckon I represent from your viewpoint, the other end of the horn. You produce these things on the basis of recommendations and your own mental cerebrations, and then we use them. A matter of weeks ago the task force under my command was busily engaged in destroying Japanese with those items of equipment. Colonel Hussa though it might be of interest to you to have a first hand description of their performance with certain comments on things we might further produce to facilitate our destruction of the Japs. The Marine Parachute Troops, whom I am associated with, are primarily of course, a small arms organization; and my remarks of Ordnance performance will be confined for the most part to that type of weapon. These are the weapons with which we are normally armed, and which I have observed to some extent in combat with the enemy.<br><br>The U.S. Rifle Caliber .30 M1- It is magnificent. We will stop there.<br><br>The Johnson Rifle- With which I am sure some of you are familiar. Fabricated by the Johnson Arms Company. It is satisfactory. We are not procuring any more in the Marine Corps, so it is not a matter of particular interest.<br><br>The Reising Sub-Machine Gun Caliber .45-This as you probably know is a folding stock parachute model .45 caliber weapon, built as a replacement for the Thompson gun. Later models which have been accurately fabricated are quite satisfactory. They function well and as the .45 goes it is quite acceptable. However, I would like to interject for my part I never want to see .45 caliber weapons in the jungle. The Japs are not afraid of them, they do not make enough noise, and the bullet does not go far enough through the heavy undergrowth. They spend themselves rapidly and the weapon and ammunition together are too heavy to warrant them being taken. The men throw them away.<br><br>The Thompson Sub-Machine Gun- The same remarks apply, magnified. It is much too heavy, it is uncomfortable to carry and it does not function well. I know the Russians like it, but I believe they just don’t know any better. It does not function well in the jungle. It does not stand up. That is a generality, I suppose I should expound on this a little bit. When I say they do not stand up, they do not react well to the destructive effect of continued immersion. As you know, small arms consume quantities of powder which makes a dandy paste with water and sand, and presently the automatic function is destroyed.<br><br>The Browning Automatic Rifle- A very fine weapon, but just like the P-40, it is in our mind outmoded. It is a dead duck. It was practically replaced in my command by a weapon erroneously termed the Johnson Light Machine Gun. This Johnson Light Machine Gun is in actuality a machine rifle comparable in all tactical respects to the B.A.R. But, it is lighter, lighter by pounds, lighter lets say by 100 rounds of caliber .30 ammunition on a soldier’s back. It functions miraculously well under the most adverse circumstances. It is accurate. Now I am attempting to say in correct terms, that because of the splendid sight, as compared with a very questionable one in the case of the B.A.R., and because of an action which results in the bullet being on its way before the machinery starts to work you can destroy snipers with it in a single shot. You can provide full support in the reduction of pill boxes, bunkers, and fixed defenses. Troops will not go in under a B.A.R. because it is not sufficiently precise because of its sight and inherent action. I believe that you are doing something about the B.A.R. action. I should be delighted to see it, and while you are doing it, take five pounds off of it. It will then be comparable to the, I dare say, to this machine weapon called the Johnson Light Machine Gun with the exception to its functioning. Side by side we found the Johnson Light Machine Gun to function more dependably.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="589" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-79.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10826" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-79.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-79-300x252.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-79-600x505.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The man on the left is armed with the M1 Rifle, the man on the right the Browning Automatic Rifle, better known as the B.A.R.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The U.S. Rifle Caliber .30 M1903- We have them only because we had no other vehicle on which to mount the anti-tank launchers and the remarks with regard to that weapon are the conventional ones-utterly dependable, extremely accurate, very valuable.<br><br>The Carbine- My organization being parachutist was equipped with the carbine folding stock, and we found it to be a most effective weapon. It is of sufficiently high velocity to drive its way through the heavy jungle foliage. It is accurate, and most of all, it is light and comfortable, 75 rounds of it on your person leaves you entirely free to carry anything you wish. You don’t even know you have it. The men have confidence in it and it works well. It works extremely well under arduous conditions. I understand that there have been adverse comments on this weapon from the European Theatre to the extent that it lacks precision at ranges in excess of 400 yards. I am entirely ignorant of such circumstances because I have never seen one fired at over 50 yards, at which range they are a splendid weapon. There is a need for carbine tracer ammunition, at first I was required to arm all squad leaders with rifles so that they could use .30 tracer for target designation. If we had carbine tracer, they would have naturally been armed with a carbine, thereby giving them a good deal more mobility. I am told such a thing exists but that the requirement has been rather low, I cannot see why, and I only urge that some thought be given to the distribution. You know that people in the field sometimes do not know what is going on. I didn’t know such a thing existed; and therefore never asked for any. If it had been even hinted that such a thing existed, I dare say, many jungle units would ask for caliber .30 carbine tracer ammunition.<br><br>The Bazooka- We used it as an anti-barge weapon against Jap landing barges. I reckon you look upon that as makeshift, but it did an extremely credible job. One round of bazooka ammunition in a Jap landing barge and its all over. Unfortunately you have to get pretty close as they are armed with twin 50’s and on some occasions with twin 20’s, and they take effective measures sometimes to prevent you from getting close. We also use it against pill boxes and bunkers in the embrasure attack, and it is, as you may guess, quite as effective as the M9A1 Grenade and a bit more accurate at ranges exceeding 50 yards. But we condemned it in principal for that particular task for the reason that when do not use it as a bazooka you do not use it at all. Now with the anti-tank grenade on the rifle you still have an effective small arms weapon. We used them (bazookas) but the next time we will leave them behind.<br><br>At this moment I would like to interject that weight, even down to ounces, is a critical thing. The men are taxed to their physical utmost to the extent unless they are highly disciplined they will throw essentials away. On occasion it is pretty hard to set yourself to the task of coercing a man to hang onto something that you yourself feel he is not going to use.<br><br>It has come to my mind at the moment that I have done Mr. Browning a dreadful injustice in omitting one of the finest pieces of ordnance that has ever been designed, and that is the 1919A4 Light Machine Gun, which we used to prodigious effect. It is the most dependable weapon that ever came down the road. My only comments are those of humility. I am a member of the determined and belligerent school, which says, I repeat, which says we have no need for a water-cooled machine gun so long as we have that splendid weapon (1919A4) in our possession”.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="416" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-69.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-10827" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-69.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-69-300x178.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-69-600x357.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Legendary 1919A4 Browning “Light” Machine Gun</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>General Barnes: “Any comments, questions? (None) Thank you very much Colonel Krulak”.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N3 (December 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
