<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Melvin Johnson &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/melvin-johnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:19:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The M1941 Johnson Rifle: The Most Reliable Semi-Auto Rifle of All Time</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-m1941-johnson-rifle-the-most-reliable-semi-auto-rifle-of-all-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Dickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 18:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearm History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rotary Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=45594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Jim Dickson The title of the most reliable semi-auto rifle of all time goes to the M1941 Johnson. While the M1 Garand has been known to jam just from the sand the surf imparts in an amphibious landing, one of the favorite demonstrations of Melvin Johnson was to stuff a rag in the bore [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Jim Dickson</em></p>



<p>The title of the most reliable semi-auto rifle of all time goes to the M1941 Johnson. While the M1 Garand has been known to jam just from the sand the surf imparts in an amphibious landing, one of the favorite demonstrations of Melvin Johnson was to stuff a rag in the bore of his invention (so the barrel would not get obstructed and burst), then bury the gun completely in the sand and have it come out firing when it was dug up.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="797" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0004-copy-797x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45596" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0004-copy-797x1024.jpg 797w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0004-copy-234x300.jpg 234w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0004-copy-768x987.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0004-copy-750x964.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0004-copy.jpg 934w" sizes="(max-width: 797px) 100vw, 797px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Melvin Johnson surrounded by his firearm inventions.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The Johnson possesses one of those rare mechanisms that throws sand and dirt out of the action instead of jamming on it. I have talked to Army Ordnance men who tested the M1941 Johnson and they said that it was the ONLY gun that they ever had that they could never make jam. At the time, this made the recently adopted M1 Garand look bad. The top brass in Army Ordnance decided to lie their way out of it. They attacked Melvin Johnson&#8217;s invention in every way possible. While the Johnson&#8217;s long action soaks up almost all recoil, the M1 Garand&#8217;s action does almost nothing to mitigate recoil and has the same recoil as a bolt action rifle of the same weight. The response of the Ordnance team was to make the ridiculous claim that the soft kicking Johnson kicked so hard that it would break the soldier&#8217;s shoulder! Well, my 5-foot 2-inch, 105-pound wife never had a problem with the minuscule recoil of the Johnson.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="696" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy-1024x696.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45597" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy-1024x696.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy-300x204.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy-768x522.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy-750x510.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy-1140x775.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-1-copy.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The author’s spouse working the soft-shooting Johnson M1941.</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">ROTARY MAGAZINE</h2>



<p>The first Johnson rifles used a conventional box magazine. During a test, Melvin Johnson caught Ordnance loading the cartridges in backwards, thus ruining the magazine feed lips so that magazine failure was insured. Johnson demanded they use new magazines before the test began. Ordnance haughtily refused, and when the ruined magazines failed to work properly, they put it down as the gun jamming. This brazen and open sabotage was typical of their response to the Johnson.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy-1024x683.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45598" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy-768x512.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy-750x500.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy-1140x760.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Johnson-M1941-close-up-copy.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Johnson M1941 featured a rotary magazine that did away with stripper clips and the associated “PING” noise that notified anyone within earshot that the gun was out of ammunition.</figcaption></figure>



<p>It is not just the Johnson rifle that was treated this way. Ordnance has a long been suspected of not seriously considering any gun outside their own little clique, no matter how superior it may be. There may be another darker reason surrounding the hostility Ordnance was alleged to have had for the Johnson rifle, however. An Ordnance officer in a position to know told me that the top brass had misappropriated one million dollars for the development of the M1 Garand and this money could only be hidden in the M1&#8217;s production run. If the Johnson had been adopted, this would have all come out and these men would have gone to prison. At any rate, Johnson saw that no box magazine could escape sabotage in Ordnance tests, so he came up with his revolutionary 10-shot rotary magazine that could be topped off with standard 5-round stripper clips (or loose ammo) at any time during use. Men in combat loved it; as, if you were careful, you would never be caught reloading an empty gun with potentially fatal consequences in close quarters battle. In contrast, at the other extreme, the M1 Garand ejects it&#8217;s en bloc clip with an audible and distinctive “PING” letting everyone around you know when you have to reload. Ordnance hated that the Johnson rifle held two rounds more than the M1 so much that when the Johnson&#8217;s intended for the Dutch came into U.S. Service in WWII they blocked as many of the magazines as they could to eight rounds. My Johnson was blocked like this and had to have the magazine fixed to hold the full 10 rounds.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="631" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy-1024x631.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45599" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy-1024x631.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy-300x185.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy-768x474.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy-750x463.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy-1140x703.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ed-photos-fam-guns_0011-copy.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The evolution of the M1941 Johnson from first prototype, early box magazine models and finally the M1941 rifle.</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">HANDLING AND ACCURACY</h2>



<p>The handling qualities of the Johnson are like a fine British shotgun. When it first came out, men demonstrated this by killing birds on the wing with it. It&#8217;s handling qualities make instinct shooting easy. I have killed deer in mid leap with the M1941 Johnson where there was no possibility of using sights fast enough. Instinct shooting made perfect shoulder shots.</p>



<p>Accuracy is consistent, as there is no metal-on-wood for the barrel. It is all metal on metal and there is a ventilated handguard so that, no matter how much the barrel heats up during rapid-fire, you will not burn your hand. Too bad the old BAR wasn&#8217;t so carefully laid out. You really had to be careful around the BAR&#8217;s hot exposed barrel in combat. The worst M1941 Johnson will shoot a 2 MOA group and mine does 1 MOA. Your average M1 Garand does 3 MOA while the average M1 carbine does 2 MOA. That is assuming that the M1 rifle and M1 carbine have not had cleaning rod damage to the rifling at the muzzle since you can&#8217;t use the cleaning rod from the breech end.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">QUICK CHANGE BARREL</h2>



<p>The Johnson rifle has the quick release barrel of a machine gun, making cleaning a breeze. Simply use the nose of a cartridge to depress the barrel release at the tip of the forend and now you can withdraw the barrel. You can pour water down the bore at the breech-end directly from your canteen without worrying about getting water in the rest of the gun. Since the WWII corrosive primers contain salt, and according to the U.S. Bureau of Mines salt is ONLY soluble in water, this is important. Since the timing of the unlocking of the action is well after the bullet leaves the barrel, there is very little powder fowling in the action. This can be a lifesaver in the heat of intense, prolonged conflict where there is simply no time to clean your gun. I am always amazed at how little fouling is in the Johnson action after extensive shooting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">SHORT RECOIL ACTION</h2>



<p>The Johnson utilizes a short recoil action. Like the German machine gun designers of the MG34 and MG42, Melvin Johnson realized that gas operated weapons were inherently self-jamming due to powder fouling and corrosion. I have seen a tiny bit of rust in an M1 rifle&#8217;s gas system lock the gun up so completely that even stomping the operating rod handle would not open the action. By using recoil operation, he eliminated these problems. Between the heavy barrel recoiling a ¼-inch before unlocking the bolt, the long bolt throw backed by a long spring in the buttstock, and the weight of the gun, recoil was negligible. Recovery time was sped by the fact that the stock was as straight as possible while retaining conventional sights. The result was greatly expanded rapid-fire capability. Melvin Johnson realized that effective full-auto fire requires a gun designed from the ground up as a light machine gun, as opposed to simply putting a selector on a light rifle or carbine. The rifleman would always score more hits per rounds fired with aimed rapid-fire and the Johnson excelled at this. Add to this it&#8217;s handling like a fine shotgun and you have a winning combination for combat where whoever sees and hits the enemy first wins the gunfight. You have to have been in that situation to fully appreciate how important this is.</p>



<p>The bolt of the M1941 Johnson has multiple locking lugs which allows both for a shorter movement to unlock and allows extra protection against locking lug cracks. Johnson remembered the U.S. Krag rifle which sometimes had cracks in the locking lugs, unlike the Norwegian Krag rifles. In later years some U.S. M1 carbines had this problem, as well.</p>



<p>The action is good for up to 75,000 PSI chamber pressure and the gun will continue to work reliably there. This is in sharp contrast to the M1 rifle which could not work for any length of time with the powerful 30-06 M1 ammunition adopted in WWI. They had to go back to the original 1906 load for the M1 rifle and they tried to cover this up by redesignating it “M2” ball ammo. When the war in the Pacific demanded the 30-06 AP (armor piercing) round to deal with the entrenched Japanese, there was a widespread call for its adoption and the replacement of the M2 ball ammo. The trouble was the M1 Garands were not holding up under the pounding of this more powerful round, so it was not adopted. When the M1 was replaced by the M14 (which was basically an M1 with the White gas system that Garand had rejected as less reliable when designing the M1 and a 20-round magazine) they went to the 7.62 NATO round which put even less stress on the gun. Today you can find 30-06 loads marked as “Safe for M1 Garands” because some of the more powerful sporting loads are tearing the M1 Garands up.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="681" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1-1024x681.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-45601" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1-768x511.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1-750x499.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1-1140x758.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/johnson-rifle-copy-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Johnson M1941.</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CHAMBERINGS</h2>



<p>The Johnson prewar commercial guns often came with a .270 barrel, a 30-06 barrel, and a .35 Whelan barrel. The guns worked perfectly in all three calibers simply by changing the barrels. My personal M1941 has a 7mm Mauser barrel, the issue 30-06 barrel, and a 35 Whelan barrel. It shoots all calibers reliably, as well as all loads of these calibers. In addition to the Remington 35 Whelan loads, I also had Wolfgang Romey in Germany load me some 35 Whelan with bullets for the 350 Rigby and the 350 Rigby Magnum to Rigby velocities. We are talking about calibers from .270 to .35 and bullet weights from 140 grains to 310 grains. They all work just fine. Just swap out the quick-change barrels and you are good to go. Try all that with any other semi-auto ever made.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CONCLUSION</h2>



<p>How does the Johnson stack up against today&#8217;s M4 carbine, AK74 and others? It offers accurate fire out to 1000 meters, faster, surer aimed rapid-fire, greater reliability, and more power and penetration. As previously noted, the 10-round rotary magazine can be continually topped off so that you never run out of ammo or get shot while trying to change a magazine. In short, the M1941 Johnson can be more effective than today’s assault rifles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Johnson Automatics, Part II: The Johnson Light Machine Gun</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-johnson-automatics-part-ii-the-johnson-light-machine-gun/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N7 (Apr 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranston Arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Machine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N7]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Frank Iannamico In addition to his recoil operated semi-automatic M1941 rifle, Melvin Johnson designed and produced a machine gun, the M1941 Light Machine Gun, (H). The (H) designates a horizontal feed magazine. Similar suffixes used on other Johnson designed weapons were: (V) for a vertical fed magazine and ( R ) for a rotary [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Frank Iannamico</strong><br><br>In addition to his recoil operated semi-automatic M1941 rifle, Melvin Johnson designed and produced a machine gun, the M1941 Light Machine Gun, (H). The (H) designates a horizontal feed magazine. Similar suffixes used on other Johnson designed weapons were: (V) for a vertical fed magazine and ( R ) for a rotary fed design. The magazine fed light machine gun utilized Johnson’s unique recoil operated design, which uses residual chamber pressure and barrel recoil to operate the action. The advantage to the design is the elimination of a conventional gas system to function the weapon. When the weapon is fired the barrel recoils rearward for approximately .5 of an inch. The receiver supports the barrel on two bearing surfaces. A rotary bolt moves rearward locked to the barrel until it is unlocked by being rotated counter clockwise 20 degrees by a caming action between the receiver and bolt. The barrel’s rearward movement is stopped by a shoulder in the receiver, while the bolt continues rearward far enough to pick up a fresh round from the magazine before being pushed forward into the chamber by the recoil spring assembly. The rotating bolt head is locked to the barrel by eight lugs. The recoil spring and buffer are located in the stock. The cyclic rate of the weapon is 550-600 rounds per minute.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="341" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-94.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11405" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-94.jpg 341w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-94-146x300.jpg 146w" sizes="(max-width: 341px) 100vw, 341px" /><figcaption><em>Melvin Johnson takes aim with the 1941 LMG.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>As with his rifle, Melvin Johnson’s LMG was only used by the United States military in limited numbers. While the M1941 semi-automatic rifle had the M1 Garand as its main adversary, the LMG competed against the legendary BAR. Unfortunately, development of both Johnson’s weapons were untimely, becoming available only after the Garand and BAR had already been placed in mass production for WWII. The Marine Corps adopted Johnson’s weapons only when the BAR and Garand were not being produced in sufficient numbers to fulfill the wartime demand. The Johnson LMG, like the M1941 semi-automatic rifles, were manufactured for Johnson Automatics by a subcontractor, Cranston Arms of Rhode Island.<br><br>In reality the Johnson design had many modern and innovative features. The 1941 Model was much lighter than the BAR at 14.2 pounds with the bipod. Another very important feature, especially for a weapon of its type, was a removable barrel that could be easily replaced in the field. The weapon was select-fire, and fired from a closed bolt in the semi-automatic mode, and fired from an open bolt when in full-auto. The modes of operation: safe-fire and automatic were controlled by a single “change lever”. The overall length of the weapon was 42 inches, while the standard barrel was 22 inches in length. The barrel featured a 4-groove 1 in 10” twist, and according to the operator’s manual, could be replaced “in 5 to 6 seconds.” Mr. Johnson preferred that his weapon be referred to as an “automatic rifle” or “light machine rifle” rather than a “light machine gun.” He often compared his weapon to the 8mm German paratrooper automatic weapon, the FG-42 that could, and often was, fired from the shoulder like a rifle. Johnson wanted to convey that his weapons were not simply “light machine guns” but rather versatile “automatic rifles” that could easily be fired from the shoulder when necessary.<br><br>The rear sight on the LMG is a flip up aperture style, calibrated in yards, the sight featured two apertures, the upper one for up to 1,000 yard range and the other (placed 49 MOA lower) designed for barrage fire up to 1500 yards. The adjustable rear sights were supplied to Johnson Automatics by either the Lyman or Marbles Company. The blade style front sight is unusually high, (similar to that of the M16 rifle) because of the “straight line” configuration of the stock. The twenty round capacity, single feed box-style magazine is also unique, as there are no feed lips. The feed lips are machined into the receiver. Also located inside of the receiver is a rotary magazine mechanism similar to that of the Johnson semi-automatic rifle. The box magazine is inserted into the left side of the receiver. The magazine release lever also serves as a cartridge-retaining device to keep the loaded rounds from flying out of the magazine in the absence of conventional feed lips. When the magazine is inserted into the weapon, the magazine support guide hook cams upward on a ramp and releases the cartridges in the magazine. The magazine spring then locks onto a shoulder on the ramp and locks the magazine into place. The cartridges are then fed into the integral magazine inside of the receiver. An additional five rounds could be loaded into the receiver making the total capacity of the weapon 25 rounds. The magazine could be easily recharged while in the weapon via the M1903 rifle stripper clips. The magazine was overly long because of its single stack/single feed design. The magazine body was also easily damaged.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="516" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-126.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11409" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-126.jpg 516w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-126-221x300.jpg 221w" sizes="(max-width: 516px) 100vw, 516px" /><figcaption><em>The manual for the M1944 Light Machine gun on top, with the French manual on bottom. (Photo courtesy Jim Pullen)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>A detachable folding bipod was also featured on the Model 1941 LMG. The bipod is placed well back from the muzzle, allowing the weapon to be traversed over a wide area very quickly. The M1907 sling was often issued with the weapon, as well as a web style sling. A tan color bag type magazine pouch was designed for issue with the Johnson, for carrying the long, curved Johnson magazines. The pouches are extremely rare today.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="288" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-121.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11412" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-121.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-121-300x123.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-121-600x247.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>M1941 Johnson LMG</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>It has often been reported that 10,000 of the Johnson M1941 Light Machine Guns were manufactured, but the actual number of weapons produced was much less. These were adopted and used during World War Two by U.S. Marine paratroopers and the Marine Raiders in the Pacific Theater, as well as the U.S./Canadian Army First Special Service Force in Italy and North Africa. The Netherlands also ordered a substantial number, but few were delivered before the Dutch East Indies fell into Japanese hands. A few of the light machine guns were believed to be procured and used by the French. Generally the weapon’s performance was acceptable, although there were a few reports that it was too fragile for extreme combat conditions. The long leaf spring extractor was especially prone to failure under extended combat use.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="155" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-107.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11411" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-107.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-107-300x66.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-107-600x133.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The improved M1944 Model.</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>An improved model was introduced in 1944. This version was known as the Model 1944 Johnson Light Machine Gun. Problems and experience from the first design generated the improvements that were incorporated in the 1944 Model. The receiver was redesigned for more positive feed to prevent jamming. A redesigned tubular buttstock was manufactured from Micarta, and the pistol grips were made of plastic, no wood furniture was used on the M1944. A cleaning kit was stored in the lower portion of the stock. The bipod of the earlier model was replaced by an adjustable nine position, folding 1.7 pound integral monopod. When the weapon was fired from the shoulder the folded monopod served as a forearm for the support hand. The weapon weighed a total of 14.7 pounds. The M1944 operator’s manual states that the cyclic rate is variable from 350 to 750 rounds per minute by changing the buffer springs in the stock. The only tool required for field stripping the weapon is a standard 30’06 cartridge. A special 20-inch barrel was offered as an option for cavalry or paratrooper use. The Johnson Light Machine Guns shared many of the same parts used in the M1941 semi-automatic rifle.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="173" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-90.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11413" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-90.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-90-300x74.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-90-600x148.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Field Stripping Procedures: Remove the magazine, retract the bolt and visually inspect the</em> <em>weapon’s chamber to insure it is unloaded. Depress magazine retaining latch plunger, and push barrel rearward to release. Pull barrel from receiver (A). Remove bolt handle by pulling out on spindle and at the same time slide the bolt handle forward (B). Depress receiver plunger to release and remove trigger group. Remove bolt assembly from weapon (C). No further disassembly is needed for cleaning this weapon in the field.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Both the Johnson rifle and the light machine gun saw limited service during WWII with the Office of Strategic Services. The OSS found that the Johnson weapons when disassembled were easily concealed and offered a lot of large caliber firepower. Fidel Castro’s troops also used Johnson’s weapons in his revolution against Cuba’s Batista government in 1958-59. Ironically anti-Communist Cuban Guerrillas also used Johnson weapons against Castro in the ill-fated struggle to reclaim their homeland.<br><br>Development of the Johnson Light Machine Gun concept continued after WWII, resulting in a Model of 1945 LMG. There was little post war interest and the light machine gun development program was terminated in 1947. In the 1950s the Israelis manufactured a close copy of the Johnson design called the Dror. The Israeli version was chambered in 8mm Mauser and .303 British. Like the Johnson before it the Dror was only manufactured in limited quantities.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="592" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-61.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11414" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-61.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-61-300x254.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-61-600x507.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Marines firing Reisings, Johnsons and BARs.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Melvin Johnson continued in the firearms business after the war ended. His company specialized in converting military rifles into sporters for hunting. He also offered his M1941 rifles in both sporter and military configurations. Melvin Johnson died in 1965 at the age of 55.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N7 (April 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
