<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>MK18 &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/mk18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:09:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>MK19 History &#038; the State of the Art of Grenade Machine Guns</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/mk19-history-the-state-of-the-art-of-grenade-machine-guns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearm History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grenade Launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grenades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MK18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mk19]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=37925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are many early patents for weapons designed to launch explosive devices, but until the 1950s, the U.S. didn’t take the idea too seriously. With the advent of the 40x46mm grenade and its legendary M79 launcher, wheels started turning in the minds of designers and soldiers alike. Evolution of the single shot launchers has been covered in-depth by SADJ in the past; it is the idea of the U.S. designed, belt-fed, quickly repeating launchers (grenade machine guns) that is our subject.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Dan Shea</em></p>



<p><em>We at SADJ wanted to cover the history of U.S. grenade machine guns, and with a recent visit to <a href="http://www.usord.com/weapons/mk19-mod3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">US Ordnance, the prime manufacturer of the MK19 Mod 3</a>, it seemed like a perfect time. Later in this article, we’ll cover the modern MK19 system and improvements in depth. But first, a look at where we’ve come from.</em>..</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="678" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2-1024x678.jpg" alt="Grenade Machine Gun" class="wp-image-37930" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2-1024x678.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2-768x508.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2-750x496.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2-1140x754.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2-2.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">MK19 Mod 3 grenade machine gun at the range on an M3 tripod with target practice solid blue tip ammunition lined up for firing.</figcaption></figure>



<p>Throwing grenades is nothing new. Reports of tossing explosives at enemies go back to the dark ages and certainly many armies had “grenadiers” in the 1700s and 1800s; light the fuse, toss the grenade. It wasn’t until mechanical fuses and primer firing were evolved that the idea of launching grenades automatically occurred. There are many early patents for weapons designed to launch explosive devices, but until the 1950s, the U.S. didn’t take the idea too seriously. With the advent of the 40x46mm grenade and its legendary M79 launcher, wheels started turning in the minds of designers and soldiers alike. Evolution of the single shot launchers has been covered in-depth by SADJ in the past; it is the idea of the U.S. designed, belt-fed, quickly repeating launchers that is our subject.</p>



<p>A proper timeline would be in two lines; the 40x46mm low velocity rounds, and the 40x53mm high velocity rounds. LV rounds have a range of 350-400 meters and can be shoulder fired or fired in a vehicle-mounted full-auto launcher, the HV rounds can go out to 2200 meters and are not for shoulder fired launchers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Approximate Milestones for 40&#215;46 Low Velocity Development:</h2>



<p>1950s: Development of the 40x46mm low velocity grenade, and M79 launcher.<br>1965: Development and deployment of the MK18 Mod 0 crank fired launcher.<br>1968-71: Development and deployment of the MK20 Mod 0 automatic launcher.<br>1968: Development and deployment of various XM174E2 launchers.<br>1968: Development and deployment of the dual caliber M129 helicopter gun.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Approximate Milestones for 40&#215;53 High Velocity Development:</h2>



<p>1964: Final evolution of the 40x53mm high velocity grenade.<br>1966: MK19 Mod 0 design at Naval Ordnance Station, Louisville.<br>1969-74: Development of the Hughes XM175 series of launchers.<br>1968: Deployment of the first MK19 Mod 0 to Vietnam.<br>1971: Deployment of the first MK19 Mod 1 to Vietnam.<br>1974: Development of the MK19 Mod 2, not fielded.<br>1970s (Approximate): 600 MK19 Mod 2 Aluminum receiver guns- Israel.<br>1984-1989: Final development and manufacture of the MK19 Mod 3 by Saco Defense, then 1990s General Dynamics, and currently US Ordnance.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="887" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18-1024x887.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37933" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18-1024x887.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18-300x260.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18-768x666.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18-750x650.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18-1140x988.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3-XM172-MK18.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The XM172, also known as MK18 Mod 0.</figcaption></figure>



<p>“The Honeywell Gun,” variously called the XM172, or the MK18 Mod 0, this was a crank fired belt fed, with 40x46mm ammunition; the same ammunition used in the M203/M79/M320 system. The ammunition is pre-loaded into a tape that holds the case in line with the barrel. Two rounds were fired per full revolution of the belt, allowing for slow, ranging fire, or firing up to about 250 rounds per minute. Belts were 24- or 48-round lengths. This was into action in about 1965 and survived in various places for U.S. forces (Navy) in Vietnam, primarily on “PBRs” (patrol boat, river) although some use on Chinook helicopters working over landing zone perimeters was seen.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="794" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172-1024x794.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37935" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172-1024x794.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172-300x233.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172-768x595.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172-750x581.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172-1140x884.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/3a-XM172.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">MK18 Mod 0 with the cover open.</figcaption></figure>



<p>MK18 Mod 0 with the cover open, showing the lower rotor with a round in position, and the upper rotor inside the cover. The two rotors are keyed together so that when the top cover is down, each rotor makes half of the chamber. Since it is Hi-Low pressure, low velocity, the round can be fired like this, and much like a revolver, the projectile must enter a separate barrel. The rounds were initially held in a metallic tape, since they didn’t need to be extracted, the tape simply came through with empty cartridge cases in it. This was later changed to a reloadable Mylar backed fabric which, for many, doubled as a grenadier’s belt for the M79 shooters.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="531" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm-1024x531.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37936" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm-1024x531.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm-300x156.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm-768x398.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm-750x389.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm-1140x591.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4-MK20-Mod-0-left-view-40x46mm.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The MK20 Mod 0.</figcaption></figure>



<p>Around 1966, the Navy wanted a better system than hand-cranking. Colonel George M. Chinn, author of the famous five-volume series of books “The Machine Gun” was involved. His team at Naval Ordnance Station in Louisville, Kentucky was simultaneously involved in designing an automatic grenade launcher to replace the crank-fired MK18 and, by 1967, the team had the boxlike MK20 Mod 0 in 40x46mm, and was preparing for the new MK19 system in 40x53mm.</p>



<p>The MK20 is an unusual design, the cocking handle is pushed forward, and the barrel moves forward and stays “cocked.” On pushing the trigger, the barrel springs to the rear, over the grenade, pushing it onto the firing pin and the barrel moves forward with the projectile moving forward in its bore. The cycle repeats as long as the trigger is depressed. Production was ended in 1971, when Chinn’s group was advancing the MK19 system.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37937" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5-MK19-Mod-1-a.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The MK19 Mod 0.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The MK19 Mod 0 was fielded, at first, in 1968 in small numbers in Vietnam, and was an unreliable system. It utilized the newly designed 40x53mm round, and fired from an “open bolt” but using ‘advance primer ignition’. This means the firing pin struck the primer before the cartridge was fully seated and in battery. The Mod 1 debuted as in this example in 1971 and, by 1974, it was evident that there were reliability issues and a “Mod 2” was designed but not implemented. These were all done by Colonel Chinn’s team at the Naval Ordnance Station in Louisville, Kentucky.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37938" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/5a-MK19-Mod-1-inset.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The MK19 Mod 0 was fielded, at first, in 1968 in small numbers in Vietnam, and was an unreliable system.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="283" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2-1024x283.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37939" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2-1024x283.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2-300x83.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2-768x212.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2-750x208.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2-1140x315.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/6-MK19-Mod-2.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The MK19 Mod 2.</figcaption></figure>



<p>There was, in fact, a production of the Mod 2. The MK19 Mod 2 Israeli contract gun in 40x53mm with an aluminum receiver. Approximately 600 were made. There’s no clear historical evidence pointing to the location of actual manufacture; at Naval Ordnance, or as a technical data package exported to Israel, perhaps with parts for assembly abroad.</p>



<p>In any event, these functioned but were not advanced into larger production and the MK19 Mod 3 replaced them in service. The Israeli Mod 2s were sold on the surplus market, and the parts were initially offered as “MK19 Mod 3” replacement parts in the mid-2000s, but of course none of the parts interchanged with the Mod 3 guns. Some steel receivers were made and project guns tested in the U.S. by a variety of smaller manufacturers, but there was a clear size and parts difference with the issue MK19 Mod 3. Today, it appears these parts are offered as “MK19 Mod 2.5” complete guns in a modern production, new receiver program. Not to discourage potential end users, but these are not compatible with the MK19 Mod 3 system, which is physically larger and does not interchange parts. It would be inadvisable to mix the systems and support, so if the Mod 2.5 is chosen, it should be supported on its own and verification of spare parts supply should be done.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="766" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison-1024x766.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37943" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison-1024x766.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison-768x575.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison-750x561.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison-1140x853.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/7-MK19-Mod-2-3-comparison.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A MK19 Mod 3 stripped receiver, showing that, in comparison, it is about 25% larger than the MK19 Mod 2 Israeli aluminum receiver gun that is behind it. This will be the same difference with the Mod 0, Mod 1, and Mod 2.5 guns.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="865" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129-1024x865.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37945" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129-1024x865.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129-300x254.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129-768x649.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129-750x634.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129-1140x963.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/8-XM129.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The M129 grenade launcher.</figcaption></figure>



<p>M129: This is a unique electrically operated system that had a cam path in the receiver housing, but instead of the bolt traveling in that path like a Gatling or an M134, the barrel reciprocated. The barrel would start in the forward position, and when fired would cam back over the round, fire it, then move forward for extraction. These were mounted in chin pods on the front of many Huey gunships in Vietnam as well as other rotary winged aircraft. It replaced the very similar M75 system which had accuracy issues, among other problems. The M129 could fire either 40x46mm or 40x53mm grenades, depending on how the feed was set up.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="806" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/9-XM174E2-Cover-806x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37946" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/9-XM174E2-Cover-806x1024.jpg 806w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/9-XM174E2-Cover-236x300.jpg 236w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/9-XM174E2-Cover-768x976.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/9-XM174E2-Cover-750x953.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/9-XM174E2-Cover.jpg 944w" sizes="(max-width: 806px) 100vw, 806px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The XM174E2 as shown on this operator&#8217;s manual.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The XM174E2 was a drum fed 40x46mm automatic gun on tripod that was made in very small quantity in the late 1960s by Aerojet Ordnance &amp; Manufacturing Company. These made a shadowy appearance in Vietnam: Colonel David Lutz, USMC ret’d, told this author once of how he’d found two of these XM174E2s with drum feeds at a base armory and took them to his area of operations in the A Shau valley. He and his men were quite impressed with the accuracy and firepower in fighting the Vietcong and NVA, and wanted more of them. As Colonel Lutz (Lt. Lutz at the time) stated it “Then, adult supervision showed up, demanded to know where we had gotten these, and took them away in that time-honored military tradition of if it works well, you can’t have it.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="681" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL-1024x681.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37947" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL-768x511.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL-750x499.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL-1140x758.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/10-XM175-AL.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">XM175AL</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="681" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST-1024x681.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37948" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST-768x511.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST-750x499.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST-1140x758.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/11-XM175-ST.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">XM175ST</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<p>In the late 1960s and early 1970s, there were two versions of the M175 40x53mm grenade machine gun; first was the XM175AL (above, left) which had a milled, rounded receiver, and the second version XM175ST (above, right) had a boxlike sheet metal receiver. Hughes Gun Systems in Culver City, California was the design group and manufacturer. Both were open bolt firing, link-belt fed, could be converted to be right- or left-feed, and did not require external power like the M129. The M175 was designed initially for ground vehicle use, and then the vision changed for it to become a manually operated helicopter door gun.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">More on the MK19 in the Modern Day….</h2>



<p>In the 1980s, FNMI in South Carolina was awarded the contracts for the M16A2, the M249 SAW, the M240G, and the MK19 Mod 3, all at the same time. Chief Engineer George Kontis described the situation, “We knew we could not properly perform all four of the contracts simultaneously, and the contracting officer did as well, and offered our choice of three—leave one behind. After a full review, I determined that the MK19 Mod 3 TDP and learning curve would be the hardest, so FNMI withdrew from the MK19.”</p>



<p>Saco Defense was awarded the contract for MK19 Mod 3, and it took almost six years to develop the TDP and production process on the especially difficult receiver and bolt production. We visited the Saco facility numerous times during this period and tested the weapon in many of the phases of production along with the M6E4 program run by Marc Desrochers. Kevin Sullivan of today’s Nostromo company was project manager in the mid to later MK19 program success. Saco was bought out by General Dynamics, and the GD MK19 Mod 3 production was in full delivery for many years. Several other companies have tried to go into production, but the advantage goes to larger companies, and indeed the U.S. DoD wanted a secondary manufacturer capability during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars; ATK was awarded this, with FN Manufacturing as a subcontractor on the receivers and bolt bodies.</p>



<p>In the 1990s, I was involved in importation of special tripods and mounts from Vinghog of Norway for my USG customers. At that time, the accepted first burst hit probability at 1000 meters for the MK19 Mod 3 on M3 tripod with fixed cradle was approximately 53%. In our testing for U.S. government agencies, we ascertained that the HK GMG had a much higher first burst hit probability, and much of that advantage was in the tripod and soft mount as well as a good sighting system. (GMG testing for this author started in 1993 and continued through the Yuma Proving Ground tests in 1996-97. It’s a fine GMG but not the subject of this article). &nbsp;</p>



<p>The customers wanted to retrofit their MK19s to gain similar accuracy. With the addition of the special Norwegian soft mount, the Adjustable Sight Mounting Bracket and some rudimentary head’s up sights with 40mm gradients, we brought the MK19 Mod 3 reliability to about 85% for first burst at 1000m. My point? The MK19 Mod 3 is an excellent grenade machine gun that needs mount stability and proper sighting. The advancements since that time have been by leaps and bounds, with the ability to land short bursts at long ranges increasing exponentially.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The MWO</h2>



<p>There is a program that came out of the accuracy testing that was done. In June of 2002, a five-year plan was adopted for the MK19 Mod 3s in the U.S. Army system. MWO 9-1010-230-50-1 was implemented with an expected completion date of June 2007. However, that was only in the U.S. Army and later USMC/USN inventories; there are still tens of thousands of MK19 Mod 3 around the world that need this upgrade.</p>



<p>The purpose of this particular modification work order (MWO) is to convert the MK19 Mod 3 Grenade Machine Gun, to the MK19 Mod 3 with Adjustable Sight Mounting Bracket. Maintenance time is reduced and there is now a structural mounting point for fire control devices. The previous “sight mount” was a half-step, providing a not very secure rail base to the existing rear sight body. With this new purpose-designed mounting base, a variety of enhanced sighting devices can finally be used. The modification kit has the trapezoidal mounting base &amp; screws, along with directions, and, for the armory, a fixture for drilling. This MWO was used as a vehicle to provide some upgrading of other parts, in particular the firing pin, firing pin sear, cam cocking, cocking lever and an adjustable secondary drive lever.&nbsp;</p>



<p>US Ordnance has the contracts for the M60E4 (the Navy SEALs’ MK43), the US M2A1 .50 caliber, as well as M240 series and other M2 guns. After several years of research and prototyping, then going into production, US Ordnance perfected their MK19 Mod 3 manufacturing procedures. They had also inherited one of the original technical data packages (TDPs) that came from Colonel Chinn, and benefitted from employees who worked the original Saco and General Dynamics programs. In their arrangements with General Dynamics and the U.S. government, US Ordnance contracted to be the manufacturer of the MK19 Mod 3 grenade machine gun. They are the official U.S. government contractor for this system, as well as for foreign military sales (FMS) and sales to allied buyers. SADJ toured the manufacturing facility recently, and with the new U.S. government contract to supply all MK19 Mod 3 and repair parts, US Ordnance is preparing for a full mil-spec live-fire test, which we will participate in and bring the report to our readers. There is a complete upgrade program that should be available to most longtime users of the MK19 Mod 3 system. Rather, it is available, but many end users are not aware of it. I have participated in several over the years, but US Ordnance is the primary on this type of project. They can gauge your existing guns, recommend the upgrades, perform them in the factory or set up on site programs. This will not work on the MK19 Mod 1, Mod 2, or the “Mod 2.5” as can be seen in the history of the development, they are different guns from the most prolific and reliable Mod 3. Contrary to some advertising and “internet wizards,” the parts of those other models do not interchange with the MK19 Mod 3 40mm Grenade Machine Gun, and it is our sincere hope that this guide will help identify what systems are in place, and how to upgrade, repair, and maintain them.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2-1024x683.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37949" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2-768x512.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2-750x500.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2-1140x760.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12-2.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products produces the MK19 air-cooled weapon system, a blowback-operated, belt-fed, crew-served 40mm grenade machine gun. This shows a MK19 Mod 3 receiver that has had the upgrades installed in it. Note the trapezoidal plate that is the new sight mounting bracket.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="695" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO-1024x695.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37950" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO-1024x695.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO-300x204.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO-768x521.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO-750x509.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO-1140x773.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12a-MWO.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">One of a variety of MK19 40mm adjustable rear sight mounts. This version slides over the new mounting bracket and provides several mounting options for laser rangefinders and sighting systems.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="862" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO-1024x862.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37951" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO-1024x862.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO-300x253.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO-768x646.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO-750x631.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO-1140x960.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/12b-MWO.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A MK19 40mm Adjustable Rear Sight Mount mounted on the new MWO directed mounting bracket.</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Meanwhile, in the USSR&#8230;</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="681" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1-1024x681.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37952" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1-1024x681.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1-768x511.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1-750x499.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1-1140x758.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/16-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The AGS-17 30x29mm Grenade Machine Gun.</figcaption></figure>



<p>While the U.S. was developing the 40x46mm and 40x53mm grenade machine guns, the Soviets were designing, as well. In 1965 the AGS concept was born and by 1971, production had begun. The AGS-17 30x29mm Grenade Machine Gun is a lightweight, tripod or vehicle mounted open bolt grenade launcher. It’s quite effective, and the smaller diameter, longer grenades have an almost spear-like travel to target. However, at 1700 meters range the time to target is very long, due to the high trajectory arc. Typically, the AGS is drum fed with 29 linked rounds per drum. SADJ has covered these extensively in the past and the analysis can be found at our websites.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37953" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17-AGS-17-30mm-HE-linked.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Belts of VOG-17 30x29mm ammunition lined up for test firing at the Sloboda Factory Range in Serbia.</figcaption></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Grenade Launcher Ammunition</h2>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="797" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1-1024x797.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37956" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1-1024x797.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1-300x234.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1-768x598.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1-750x584.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1-1140x887.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-1-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Grenades, left to right: Russian VOG-25, a caseless grenade that is front loaded into the GP25/GP30/GP34 series underbarrel launchers, as well as several “Gucci” launchers like the Bulgarian six barreled “Avalanche.” Range is about 350-400 meters, the same as the M203 rounds; 40x46mm M203/M79/M320 round, note the case is shorter than the case to its right; 40x53mm MK19 grenade; VOG-17 30x29mm grenade for the AGS-17, with its longer, thinner profile.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="887" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1-1024x887.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-37957" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1-1024x887.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1-300x260.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1-768x666.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1-750x650.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1-1140x988.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sidebar-2-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The three main contenders on the Hi-Low pressure grenade launcher system, left to right: the 40x46mm HE Fragmentation Hi-Low pressure, low velocity cutaway round, the 40x53mm Hi-Low pressure, high velocity cutaway round,  and the VOG-25 40mm “caseless” grenade.</figcaption></figure>



<p>40x46mm HE Fragmentation Hi-Low pressure, low velocity cutaway round for the M203/M79/M320 type launchers. The multiple fuses are in the front, the fragmentation ball is in the center (without energetics), and the base shows how the Hi-Low pressure system works. The primer is fired, igniting propellant in the central chamber which expands. When it reaches X pressure, it blows out through the vent holes into the sides into a much larger expansion chamber, creating a lower pressure that “pushes” the grenade into the barrel and downrange. Range is 350-400 meters.</p>



<p>At center is the 40x53mm Hi-Low pressure, high velocity cutaway round for the MK19/GMG and other Grenade Machine Gun systems, it is evident from the thick walls of the spherical chamber that there is much more pressure involved here. The cartridge case is 9mm longer than the 40&#215;46 low velocity (M203) round, and the 40x53mm round cannot be chambered in the shoulder fired launchers. Range is out to 2200 meters, depending on firing platform.</p>



<p>Right is the VOG-25 40mm grenade, a “caseless” round that is front loaded into the barrel of the GP-25/30/34 underbarrel launchers. When the primer is struck, it ignites the propellant in the chamber at the very bottom, the expanding propellant gasses vent out into the base of the launcher forming the secondary low-pressure chamber and drive the grenade down the bore and downrange. There is no cartridge case left, it has all left the launcher downrange. Range is 350-400 meters.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. NAVY MK18 MOD O CUSTOM CLOSE QUARTER COMBAT WEAPON FOR THE SEAFARING SERVICE</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/u-s-navy-mk18-mod-o-custom-close-quarter-combat-weapon-for-the-seafaring-service/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher R. Bartocci]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V11N7 (Apr 2008)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CASV-L]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Bartocci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher R. Bartocci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Close Quarter Battle Receiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CQBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explosive Ordnance Disposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MK18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPMOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Operations Peculiar MODification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Special Operation Command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSOCOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLTOR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=12955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Christopher R. Bartocci The SOPMOD (Special Operations Peculiar MODification) program was initiated by USSOCOM (United States Special Operation Command) and implemented by Naval Special Warfare Center, Crane Division, Crane Indiana, in the mid-1990s. SOPMOD set forth the requirements for a new family of weapons for SOCOM use that would be standard for all branches. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Christopher R. Bartocci</strong></em></p>



<p>The SOPMOD (Special Operations Peculiar MODification) program was initiated by USSOCOM (United States Special Operation Command) and implemented by Naval Special Warfare Center, Crane Division, Crane Indiana, in the mid-1990s. SOPMOD set forth the requirements for a new family of weapons for SOCOM use that would be standard for all branches. This would include enhancements of the M4A1 carbines, rail adaptation systems, enhanced versions of the M16 series rifle, optics that include thermal, night vision, video module, range finder and integrated pointer-illuminator. In addition to optics would be silencer/ suppressors, muzzle brakes, bayonet and shot counter.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="342" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12957" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-4-300x147.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/001-4-600x293.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Navy SEALS firing off of an aircraft carrier. This rifle is equipped with a Magpul M93B stock (no longer in production), A.R.M.S. #40 back-up sight, Knight’s Armament RAS with rail protectors, vertical pistol grip and compensator (for use with KAC quick detach suppressor). The optic is the standard issue AimPoint M68 reflex sight. (U.S. Navy)</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Part of the SOPMOD requirement was for a CQBR or Close Quarters Combat Receiver. It was to be between 10 to 12 inches and fit on the standard M4A1 lower receiver.</p>



<p><strong>The CQBR<br>(Close Quarter Battle Receiver)<br>NSN 1005-01-498-1913</strong></p>



<p>The CQBR receiver was first produced at Crane. The barrel started out life as a standard Colt M4 14.5 inch barrel. The gunsmiths at Crane would cut the barrel down to 10.5 inches, re-thread the muzzle and modify the gas port. Development of the CQBR barrel was assisted greatly by Karl Lewis, President of Lewis Machine and Tool (LMT). Then, a Knight Armament Company (KAC) RIS (Rail Interface System) and a flash suppressor/ quick detachment for the KAC silencer were added. The back-up rear sight chosen was one manufactured by Lewis Machine and Tool.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="608" height="439" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12958" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-11.jpg 608w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-11-300x217.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/002-11-600x433.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 608px) 100vw, 608px" /><figcaption><em>Marking placed on the Mk18 Mod O carbine made from placing a CQBR on a modified M16A1 lower receiver at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Indiana.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="266" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12959" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-11-300x114.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/003-11-600x228.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The complete Colt manufactured Mk18 Mod O carbine. A standard government issue “Property of U.S. Govt M4A1” lower receiver with the six position LMT stock assembly mounted with the CQBR (Close Quarter Battle Receiver) consisting of the Lewis Machine and Tool back-up sight and SOPMOD stock with. Knight’s Armament RAS with rail protectors, vertical pistol grip and compensator (for use with KAC quick detach suppressor).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Due to the short 10.5 inch barrel, the CQBR receiver remains relatively cool even when firing at a faster rate of fire. The complete Colt manufactured Mk18 Mod O carbine. A standard government issue “Property of U.S. Govt M4A1” lower receiver with the six position LMT stock assembly mounted with the CQBR (Close Quarter Battle Receiver) consisting of the Lewis Machine and Tool back-up sight and SOPMOD stock with. Knight’s Armament RAS with rail protectors, vertical pistol grip and compensator (for use with KAC quick detach suppressor). Owing to the short barrel, a significant amount of powder burns after it leaves the barrel and with this decrease in temperature, and additional modifications, the CQBR carbine will have an extended barrel life over the standard M4A1 carbine 14.5 inch barrel.</p>



<p>As previously stated, the original 10.5 inch barrel was modified by the gunsmiths at Crane. Lewis Machine and Tool had also produced some 10.5 inch barrels. Colt got together with Crane and told them that rather than Crane go through the efforts of modifying the barrels of M4 carbines, Colt could just make the barrels to Crane’s specifications: which they eventually did. This made it simpler for Crane to have Colt barrels due to the fact Colt is the sole manufacturer of the M4 carbine and government inspectors were already present in their facility. The barrels would be made to the same manufacturing specifications as their standard GI M4 barrel. At around this time, the specification was changed for the barrel length. The new specification called for a 10.3 inch barrel instead of 10.5 inches. It was found that 10.3 inches was the shortest the barrel could be for installing the KAC sound suppressor. This is the configuration Colt is producing today.</p>



<p>Currently, Colt Defense manufactures the complete CQBR upper receivers and barrels. They are 10.3 inch light contoured barrels with a chrome lined bore and chamber with the standard 1 turn in 7 inch twist. The M4/M16A4 “F” front sight base is used to properly align the front sight with the rear. They come from Colt as per specification with the Knight Armament Company RIS as well as RAS (Rail Adapter System) as well as the KAC flash suppressors which are for use with their QD sound suppressor. The bolts provided by Colt have the black extractor buffer, heavy gold extractor spring and the rubber O-ring to enhance extraction force. As per military specification, the bolts are proof tested with a 70,000 psi proof cartridge and then Magnafluxed to check for stress fractures in the metal. According to Colt, there are several Bills of Materials for the Mk18 Mod 0. The back-up rear sights are provided by SOCOM to Colt. Normally, the provided sights are the Lewis Machine and Tool back-up sights, however; others may be supplied as well.</p>



<p><strong>The Mk18 Mod 0<br>NSN 1005-01-527-2288</strong><br>With the acceptance of the CQBR receiver, the complete weapon was type classified as the Mk18 Mod 0. The U.S. Navy/SOCOM has large stocks of obsolete M16A1 rifles that were in the navy arsenals. The M16A1 rifles were used as the host weapons for the CQBR upper receiver. The standard M16A1 rifle upperreceiver was replaced with the CQBR upper receiver. The original bolt carrier group from the M16A1 was used. Some of the original bolts were upgraded with the SOPMOD Reliability Kit including a new ejector spring that is much stronger and speeds up the ejection of the fired cartridge case. The three gas rings were replaced with a single McFarland gas ring and there was a rubber O-ring placed around the extractor spring increasing the extraction force by a factor of 4.</p>



<p>The lower receivers from the M16A1 rifles were modified for use with the CQBR upper receiver. The complete fixed stock/buffer assembly was removed and replaced with a telescopic stock assembly. The receiver extension plate was replaced with a 1-point sling adapter. The stock chosen was the SOPMOD stock assembly manufactured by Lewis Machine and Tool. This stock has a dual battery compartment for storage of batteries for optics. The profile of the LMT stock is triangular and is very similar to the Colt Advanced Combat Rifle stock. The receiver extension has six positions rather than the standard four of the typical GI Colt M4. Many weapons had disconnector springs replaced with the stronger carbine spring as well. However, many different stock assemblies may be seen on MK18s, although many are not “officially” authorized.</p>



<p>Colt provides both CQBR upper receivers as well as complete firearms. The complete firearms have CQBR upper placed on new Colt “Property of U.S. Government” marked M4A1 lower receivers. The SOPMOD stock is provided.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="540" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12960" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-11-300x231.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/004-11-600x463.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The top barrel is the standard Colt M4 contour 14.5 inch barrel. The middle is the Colt M4A1 SOCOM 14.5 inch heavy barrel. Notice the flats on the side for mounting the M203 grenade launcher. The bottom is the U.S. Navy 10.3 inch CQC barrel. Notice the light contour.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>There is no standard MK18 configuration and the configurations mentioned in this article are the most common found. The Mk18 can be found with just about any accessory out there in use (mostly not authorized by Crane). The most common rail systems are the Knight’s Armament Company RIS and RAS. However, the NAVY EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) has procured CASV-EL rail systems from VLTOR that are tan color. These weapons were equipped with A.R.M.S. #40 back-up sights. Most EOD MK18s will be equipped with M68 reflex sights on LaRue mounts, but EOTech holographic sights are showing up as well. Another interesting accessory EOD purchased was the Arrandondo magazine well adapter, which is an extended magazine well that makes speed reloading faster and easier to accomplish at night. EOD procured 1,100 tan color GripPods and A.R.M.S. #40 back-up iron sights. The GripPod (NSN 1005-01-541-1772) is a fairly new accessory introduced in 2003 that has seen major use with the Special Operations Forces as well as the military at large. The GripPod won the CQB and Midrange Bipod contract by U.S Army at Picatinny Arsenal for nearly 100,000 units. GripPod is currently shipping 200,000 GripPods to the U.S. Marine Corps to field one for every infantry marine. This vertical pistol grip doubles as a grip and a bipod. By pressing a button, a bipod springs out from the base of the grip at the speed of 1/90th of a second. The length of the unit is long enough to allow the shooter to freely maneuver with a 30-round magazine in the weapon. The unit folds by grasping both legs together and pushing them back up into the pistol grip. This enabled the troop to drop to the ground with his Mk18 and go prone, but supported.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="431" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12961" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-11-300x185.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/005-11-600x369.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The Mk18 Mod O comes standard with the Lewis machine and Tool back-up iron sight. This is a robust sight that has the standard fully adjustable sight for both windage and elevation.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Back-up sights are also not standard. The most common is the Lewis Machine &amp; Tool sight. This is a fixed position rear sight identical to the standard A2 fully adjustable rear sight. If this sight is used, the optics will have to be risen to the point of aim with the sights. Also common are the Knight back-up sights &#8211; both fixed and adjustable elevation models that is part of the SOPMOD kit. Also common are the A.R.M.S. #40 and #40L back-up sights. Also used is the Matech sight. As with the M4 and M16A4 weapons, a plethora of aftermarket sights can be seen on government weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan as Uncle Sam has not had enough to go around.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="553" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12962" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-10-300x237.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/006-10-600x474.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Muzzle of the CQCR/Mk18 Mod O with the standard M4 “F” marked front sight base and a Knight’s Armament Company compensator (for use with KAC quick detach suppressor).</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Optics is not standard for the Mk18 Mod 0. Depending on what unit they are going to will determine their optics as well as availability. The most common optics would be the SOPMOD Trijicon ACOG reflex and day optical scope, and the AimPoint M68 red dot sight. Also, the EOTech holographic sight has been seen in use. The MK18 is best used with reflex sights and not magnified scopes. The purpose of the MK18 is close quarter battle and reflex sights are perfect for this task.</p>



<p>The Mk18 Mod O has proven itself in many different arenas of combat. The Navy uses them for boat security, boarding teams in their fleets, EOD, SEALS and Search and Rescue units. SOCOM has issued them as well. They may be seen n the hands of Rangers, Airborne troops, Green Berets as well as Operational Detachment Delta. The modularity of the M16/M4 systems is what has kept it the U.S. military’s weapon of choice for more than 40 years. Short barreled versions have served well in the caves of Afghanistan. The M4 carbine and Mk18 carbines has been the weapon of choice in Iraq for many reasons. These include increased mounted units as well as urban combat where targets are at close range. Colt Defense had designed a CQBR version of their OICW candidate with this barrel length as well. However, the OICW was a piston operated system with Colt’ proprietary monolithic upper receiver.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="185" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12963" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-7-300x79.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/007-7-600x159.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The Vltor CASV-L rail system, chosen by some of the Navy EOD units, has a constant rail that runs from the front sight to the rear sight. The rail attaches to the barrel nut and the rail on the top of the upper receiver.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Another secret to the Mk18 Mod 0 carbines success is the adoption of the Mk262 Mod 1 ammunition. As a rule, the shorter commando barrels decrease the velocity of the projectile so much that a tremendous amount of energy is lost so the main advantage of the 5.56mm cartridge, hydrostatic shock, is minimized. The projectile will just go through the target or splinter and come apart. The M855 ammunition exacerbates this problem even more. As with the M4 and M16A2/A4, the inconsistency of terminal performance of the issued duty cartridge has caused problems in the Global War on Terrorism. When these thin, malnourished “evil doers” are struck with the M855 projectile, they go right through. The yaw rate is very inconsistent and varies from lot to lot. Due to the penetrator core, the accuracy potential of the weapon is not realized. The M855 is ideal for asquad automatic weapon, but not a rifle where accuracy of the single shot is more critical then laying down a heavy volume of fire on buildings, vehicles or other barriers. SOCOM saw this problem and turned to the USAMU (United States Army Marksmanship Unit). SOCOM at the time was working on the SPR, destined to be the Mk11 Mod 0 and 1 rifles. They were looking for a long range match-grade combat 5.56mm cartridge. The USAMU had already developed an incredibly accurate long range cartridge that would deal with SOCOMS issues. The 77-grain Sierra Open Tip Match projectile showed excellent sub-minute of angle accuracy. However, SOCOM needed to militarize it and turned to Jeff Hoffman at Black Hills Ammunition. They told him what they wanted, and he provided the most accurate combat 5.56mm ammunition in the world. Some of the things Hoffman did was use a stronger military brass, crimped and sealed primer, flash inhibitor and worked with Sierra to produce a 77-grain OTM with a cannulure. Not only was this ammunition incredibly accurate, but extremely and consistently lethal. Due to the long profile of the projectile, when the bullet strikes a target it quickly begins to yaw and splinter in the same manner as the M855 projectile. It would perform consistently regardless if the round came from a 20, 18, 14.5 or 10.3 inch barrel. Now SOCOM’s ammunition of choice, the Mk262 Mod 1 ammunition has proven itself in the caves of Afghanistan and Iraq. The M855 ammunition has much responsibility in the terminal performance of the M16/M4 families of weapons. The early M193 ammunition inflicted more destructive wounds than the M855. The Mk262 picks up where the M193 let off, but with the benefit of long range precision accuracy.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="349" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12964" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-7-300x150.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/008-7-600x299.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>All CQCR/Mk18 Mod O weapons have as standard the heavy duty M4 extractor spring (gold) and buffer (black) with the rubber O-ring that slides over the assembly. The addition of the O-ring increases the extraction force by a factor of four. This is a major reliability enhancement on the shorter barrel versions of the M16/M4 family of weapons.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Research for this topic was quite difficult due to there being no standard weapon. The variations are numerous depending on where they were procured, equipment available at the time of procurement, unit purchased and individual purchased equipment used on the Mk18 Mod O. Shown in this article are the most common variations found. I would like to acknowledge the assistance of Karl Lewis, President of Lewis Machine and Tool, David Lutz of Knight’s Armament Company, William Keys of Colt Defense, Joe Moody of GripPod and Eric Kincel of Vltor for all of their technical assistance and providing the equipment to show in this detailed study.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="309" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12965" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-7-300x132.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/009-7-600x265.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The Colt CQBR (Close Quarter Battle Receiver) consisting of the Lewis Machine and Tool back-up sight and SOPMOD stock, Knight’s Armament RAS with rail protectors, vertical pistol grip and compensator (for use with KAC quick detach suppressor). This is how the receiver is normally configured by Colt for the Navy. The rear sight may be different depending n the particular bill of materials for the order.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="412" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-12966" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-3.jpg 412w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/010-3-177x300.jpg 177w" sizes="(max-width: 412px) 100vw, 412px" /><figcaption><em>GripPod vertical pistol grip/ Depressing a button on the top of the unit deploys the bipod. The bipod is the perfect height to be able to go into the prone position with a 30-round magazine in place. This is one of the newest and most innovative accessories for the weapon.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V11N7 (April 2008)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
