<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Shea &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/shea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:29:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>RAFFICA SPECIAL- THE RPG-7 SYSTEM</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/raffica-special-the-rpg-7-system-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N3 (Dec 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Panzerfaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Explosive Anti-Tank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M57]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panzerfaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG-7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG-7 Rounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG-7 System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG-7D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPG-7V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Type 56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Un-Exploded Ordnance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UXO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume10N3]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[interview by Dan Shea Dear readers of Raffica: On occasion a subject question becomes too large for our normal Q&#38;A format. When that occurs, we move to a &#8220;Raffica Special&#8221; and we are in that position right now. We have had so many questions regarding the operation of the RPG-7 system that the only way [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>interview by Dan Shea</em></p>



<p>Dear readers of Raffica: On occasion a subject question becomes too large for our normal Q&amp;A format. When that occurs, we move to a &#8220;Raffica Special&#8221; and we are in that position right now. We have had so many questions regarding the operation of the RPG-7 system that the only way to properly answer this is with a &#8220;Special.&#8221; Since I have been working on a photo ID series of the various basic RPG systems for many years, and we were just preparing to do the ultimate worldwide ID Guide to these launchers, we decided to prep the readers with this How It Works guide first. Several other articles will soon follow including the RPG ID Guide and an in-depth analysis of the sighting systems. We hope this guide helps dispel many of the myths surrounding the RPG-7 system, and educates our readers to the basic functions and differences. &#8211; Dan</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="700" height="183" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-56.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16502" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-56.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-56-300x78.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/001-56-600x157.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Soviet RPG-2 launcher with strap, covers and grenade in firing position. This specimen dates from 1952.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Shoulder fired rocket launchers are nothing new. Neither are rifles with integral grenade launchers for that matter. In the 18th century, there were seven foot long flintlock style rifles that a rocket shaft was aligned in, and a transfer bar operated the flintlock mechanism located out at the front of the launcher. The buttstock, trigger group, etc., look normal, then the lock was out at the very front. There was another design from the same period where the buttstock was cylindrical and opened up at the shoulder end to make a cup style grenade launcher. The lock was able to fire either the musket barrel or the grenade launcher with the flick of a switch. The grenade launcher was used mortar style of course. These are mentioned simply to show that weapons designers have been making man portable launchers and hurlers for centuries. It is only in the modern times that we have fine tuned the process.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="207" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-55.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16505" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-55.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-55-300x89.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/002-55-600x177.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>People’s Republic of China Type 56 variant of the RPG-2. This is the 40mm straight tube launcher primarily used by the Viet Cong forces early on during the Vietnam War. It was referred to as the B40, and some B40s were made in North Vietnam. Later in the war- approximately 1967- the RPG-7 was used. This specimen dates from 1956.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The roots of the RPG-7 launcher can be found in the German Panzerfaust (literally &#8220;Tank-Fist&#8221; in German) of World War II. This was little more than a tube with a firing mechanism to launch a primitive warhead, but it gave the infantryman the ability to launch an explosive charge farther than he had been able to previously. Developments during and after World War II went in several directions, with some countries concentrating on the recoilless rifle principle and others looking more to shoulder fired rocket launchers.</p>



<p>In 1948-49, the Soviets introduced the RPG-2 system. The RPG-2 initially was a simple tube with a rocket propelled grenade that was fired from it. Behind the rocket was an expeller charge that basically threw the rocket forward from the tube, and then a pyrotechnic fuze fired the rocket itself when it was safely in front of the operator. The RPG-2 rockets were not reliably timed for firing so the accuracy degraded at distances beyond 100 meters. Stabilization came from six thin sheet metal fins at the rear of the rocket motor, which did a reasonable job for accuracy. The RPG-2 series had an expected range of 150 meters, so the sights were fixed ladder types with no allowance for adjustment. Later models had some modifications, such as a rudimentary blast shield at the rear to help keep any backblast away from the operator. This was neither a blast cone nor a venturi.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="640" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-49.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16507" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-49.jpg 640w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-49-274x300.jpg 274w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/003-49-600x656.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption>Rudimentary blast deflector on the rear of this RPG-2 was designed as an afterthought to prevent any of the backblast coming forward onto the operator.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="472" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-51.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16508" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-51.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-51-300x202.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/004-51-600x405.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The RPG-2 round has a raised metal projection that indexes into a channel on the top of the RPG-2 launcher directly in front of the flip up front sight. Part of the assistant gunner’s job was to ensure that the round was positively in position when he loaded it. If it wasn’t indexed and seated, then the primer would not be in the proper position for the firing pin, resulting in a “No-fire” situation. Of all problems on the RPG series, lack of proper alignment is the cause of most failures to fire in the field.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The RPG-2 system was manufactured until its replacement, the RPG-7, appeared in 1962. The Communist Chinese built and distributed the B-40, an RPG-2 variant, and the Yugoslav&#8217;s built a much heavier similar launcher called the M57.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="276" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-44.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16510" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-44.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-44-300x118.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/005-44-600x237.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Dummy RPG-2 round with fins extended, and one type of dummy ejection charge underneath it. The ejection charge would be removed from packaging directly before firing and screwed onto the back of the round. The charges are very moisture and physical damage sensitive, but less so than RPG-7 charges.</figcaption></figure>



<p>It is strongly recommended against firing RPG-2, M57, or B-40 rounds as there has not been recent manufacture and the chemical compositions and fuzes are now untrustworthy. Unless the operator can verify recent manufacture, these should be avoided. The launchers themselves are simple mechanical devices so with fresh ammunition they would be fieldable. Antique, outdated and outclassed, but fieldable RPG-2 series grenades do not have timed safety self destruct fuzes, so a &#8220;dud&#8221; round will become a UXO (Un-Exploded Ordnance) hazard.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="664" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-40.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16513" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-40.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-40-300x285.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/006-40-600x569.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>RPG-2 fins extended. At the front of the fins, towards the nose cone, there are some spring steel wire rings. These are normally over the fins, holding them to the body of the rocket section. When the ejection charge is screwed on, then the grenade is inserted into the RPG-2 tube, these rings are pushed forward by the tube, and the six fins try to open. These fins exert outward pressure on the inside of the RPG-2 tube, and hold the grenade in place.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="607" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16517" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-29.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-29-300x260.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/007-29-600x520.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>If the RPG-2 round is removed from the RPG-2, the fins will extend. In this photo, the ejection charge has been unscrewed, and the fins are being manually held in. This shows that the fins can be held down enough to reinsert the round into the RPG-2 launcher (Ejection charge would be on for this). However, once the fins have been extended, and the operator desires to put the round away for storage, it would require holding the fins down firmly enough to slide the retaining rings back over them. This can not generally be done by hand. There is a cup shaped metal tool with six slots in it that can be slid over the extended fins, then rotated with the fin direction, folding the fins down. Once wound completely on, the retaining rings can be slid in place and the round can be stored again. Return to storage or carrier also depends on if there is any type of fuze safety involved (Later Yugo style) that must be replaced before storage.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>RPG-7</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="415" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-25.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16518" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-25.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-25-300x178.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/008-25-600x356.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Close up view of one of the signature appearances of the RPG-7 series; the Blast cone at the rear. This is actually a divergent nozzle, which will accelerate supersonic gases.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-23.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16519" width="580" height="149" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-23.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-23-300x77.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/009-23-600x154.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px" /><figcaption>RPG-7V, left hand view. This example is dated 1966. Note the much larger central tube section, the blast cone at the rear, and the addition of a second handgrip.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="187" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-19.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16520" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-19.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-19-300x80.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/010-19-600x160.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Right side view of a fully cutaway RPG-7V tube.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>For the purposes of this article, we will be discussing the Russian/Soviet made RPG-7 series: the RPG-7V and RPG-7D. There are approximately 29 different variations made around the world and SAR will be covering models and countries of manufacture at a later date in the ID Guide. Two of the most basic designs have been copied by many countries: the Soviet style and the Chinese style. The fastest way to tell which school the RPG came from is that the Chinese style utilizes a bipod, a shoulder rest, and has adjustable front and rear sights, while the original Russian model does not.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16521" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-16-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/011-16-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>RPG-7V trigger group with markings.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="350" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/012-12.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16522" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/012-12.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/012-12-300x150.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/012-12-600x300.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>On the right is the standard diameter of the 40mm tube. The rocket section fits here, and the expeller charge fits to the center of the expansion tube in the middle. This is one of the major upgrades in the RPG- 7 system. The base of the expeller charge seats into the narrowed section to the left.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="267" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/013-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16523" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/013-9.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/013-9-300x114.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/013-9-600x229.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>On the right of this closeup is the expansion chamber area. The expeller charge base slides in from the right and seats firmly into the narrowed section at the center. The foam plug at the base of the expeller charge actually seats there. This photo also shows the joint between the forward tube and the rear tube in manufacturing. Although this is threaded, this is not an armorer’s disassembly point as it is welded. Also, the narrowing at the joint is a venturi: a narrowing of the tube going to an increased diameter, which changes gas flow pressure direction and speed.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Several initial changes appear in the RPG-7 series. The example in these photos is the second variation, the RPG-7V. The &#8220;V&#8221; model is simply a bit smaller dimensionally, and lighter. The tube inner diameter remains at 40mm. Several manufacturing method improvements were instituted.</p>



<p><strong>RPG-7D</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="174" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/014-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16524" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/014-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/014-6-300x75.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/014-6-600x149.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Left side view of Soviet RPG-7D paratrooper take down version, manufactured in 1973.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="256" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/015-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16525" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/015-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/015-4-300x110.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/015-4-600x219.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Left side view of Soviet RPG-7D paratrooper take down version in the “carry” position.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="618" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/016-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16526" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/016-4.jpg 618w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/016-4-265x300.jpg 265w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/016-4-600x680.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 618px) 100vw, 618px" /><figcaption>RPG-7D locking latch that snaps into place when the tubes are properly mated together and ready to fire. If the tubes are not properly placed, the latch extension blocks the sear.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="326" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/017-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16527" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/017-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/017-2-300x140.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/017-2-600x279.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Male and female sides of the three lug interlocking section of the RPG-7D tube.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="507" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/018-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16529" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/018-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/018-2-300x217.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/018-2-600x435.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The RPG-7D safety latch extension is a rod that leads from the barrel connecting latch down to the sear area, and either blocks or allows the sear to operate.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="474" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/019-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16530" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/019-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/019-1-300x203.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/019-1-600x406.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The sear block is a sheet metal piece that fits around the firing pin well, and moves forward or backwards depending on the position of the locking latch.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="261" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/020-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16532" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/020-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/020-1-300x112.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/020-1-600x224.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The front and rear tubes are connected together with two bayonet lugs. Once locked into place, they are very securely attached. The hammer needs to be cocked and safety “On” in order for the rear tube to slide into place, or the trigger group needs to be removed.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/021-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16533" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/021-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/021-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/021-1-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The RPG-7D trigger group has a notch on the top right hand plate that fits around the sear block mechanism. Installation and removal of the RPG-7D trigger group requires more manipulation than a straight “on-off” like the standard groups. The operator needs to ensure the sear block mechanism is not compromised or bent when he installs the trigger group.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="630" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/022-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16535" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/022-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/022-1-300x270.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/022-1-600x540.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Standard Russian/Soviet style front sight. There are no adjustments. Chinese style front sights have drift and height adjustments. This is the only authorized position used for the front sight for firing an RPG-7.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The RPG-7D is the paratrooper&#8217;s takedown version of the RPG-7 system, which appeared in the early 1970s. There is a three lug turning takedown point with various safety features built in to avoid firing without the rear of the tube properly attached. There are two bayonet lugs used to attach the rear section to the forward tube, making for a much smaller package for jumping with.</p>



<p><strong>RPG-18<br>(Side block of four pics)</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="143" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/023-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16537" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/023-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/023-1-300x61.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/023-1-600x123.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>While the Warsaw Pact nations were pursuing the RPG series of shoulder fired rocket propelled grenade launchers that were reloadable, the US and her allies were concentrating on disposable single shot launchers; most notably the LAW M72 series of launchers. By the mid 1970s, the Soviets had experimented with their own disposable launcher, and it was called the RPG-18. There are numerous job specific RPGs of this style today; RPG-22, RPG-26, RPG-27, the Serbian M80. Essentially, the RPG-18 is like the LAW in most operational regards.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="323" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16538" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-1-300x138.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-1-600x277.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>At the rear of an RPG-18, just like in the LAW M72, there is a plastic tube with fast burning explosive powder in it that takes the mechanically fired primer gases and transmits the ignition to the rear of the rocket tube to ignite the propellant.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="323" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-2.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16539" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-2.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-2-300x138.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/025-2-600x277.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>There are two sizes of propellant strip in the rocket, that ignite in order.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="230" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/026-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16540" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/026-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/026-1-300x99.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/026-1-600x197.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Cutaway view of the shaped charge of the RPG-18, showing the similar design to the RPG-7; piezo nose fuze, rear firing fuze with explosive compound and tin coated copper cone for forming the jet.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Aiming and Boresighting</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="439" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/027.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16543" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/027.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/027-300x188.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/027-600x376.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Rear sight on the Russian/Soviet style RPG-7 has only up and down movement. Chinese style has more adjustments.</figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="378" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/028.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16544" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/028.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/028-300x162.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/028-600x324.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The rear sight is locked into either the up or down position with a leaf spring in the base.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The objective is to hit the target, and more specifically, to strike a crippling blow to the target. If the target is a tank or self-propelled gun, the goal is to take the gun out of action. Simply taking a tread or other immobilizing shot is good but keep in mind that the operators of the vehicle will be looking to return fire, and even if they are immobilized, if they can bring the main gun to bear then the RPG team is in danger as it takes 8-12 seconds to load another round.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="408" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/029.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16547" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/029.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/029-300x175.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/029-600x350.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Far left &#8211; Normal temperature firing position for the front sight is with the auxiliary sight snapped upwards into the fire position. Center &#8211; For firing under 0 degrees centigrade, the auxiliary front sight is snapped to the down, inactive position. This lowers the front sight peak, effectively raising the point of aim which is necessary due to rocket trajectory at lower temperatures. Right &#8211; Front sight in normal use. The white line is a photographic enhancement to show the difference the auxiliary front sight adds to the height of the front post. This is the standard temperature firing position.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Since the objective is to hit the target accurately, there must be a method of ensuring the sights and scope are in line with the bore. In both cases, this is accomplished by using a bore sight and a point of aim that is a minimum of 900 meters away. At the shop it is easy enough to have a set of blocks and a mount in order to immobilize the tube for this procedure, but field expedient tricks include sandbags and either a table or other flat surface. Remember to leave room with the bags for line of sight on checking the sights. This should be done by unit armorers and the operators as well, just like checking any other weapon sight when getting ready to fire. Well trained teams will constantly check their bore sight.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="347" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/030.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16553" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/030.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/030-300x149.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/030-600x297.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>RPG-7D showing the optical sight rail.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="241" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/031.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16554" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/031.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/031-300x103.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/031-600x207.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>RPG-7D with optical sight mounted.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The bore sight is usually composed of two pieces. They are both tubes and the front has a wire crosshair on it and this is inserted into the front of the tube. Some of these front pieces require the operator to put two strings on it to make the crosshairs making it possible to improvise this front section by crossing two strings over the front of the tube at 90 degrees to each other and securing them in place. As long as the crosshairs are centered, this is fine. The rear tube, if used, has either four slots with an open center, or simply an open center, that slides into the blast cone. Visually check from the rear aperture to the crosshairs in the front of the tube, and this will give you a bore center. It is quite possible to bore sight without the rear section, by moving back a bit further from the rear of the tube when sighting.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="414" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/032.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16556" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/032.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/032-300x177.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/032-600x355.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>RPG-7 standard optical sight left and right side views. Note the forehead brace above the eyepiece, and front cover in place. The optical sight has a magnification of 2.7x and a 13 degree field of view. The reticle can be illuminated from the battery on the left side with a simple on-off switch.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="532" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/033.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16557" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/033.jpg 532w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/033-228x300.jpg 228w" sizes="(max-width: 532px) 100vw, 532px" /><figcaption>RPG-7 standard optical sight, front view showing the two adjustment knobs.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>With the tube immobilized, the operator should fix the bore sight onto an object at 900+ meters. The object should have some distinct horizontal and vertical features. Once this is sighted, the mechanical sights can be checked. Russian style sights do not have much adjustment to them, but the Chinese family has full windage and elevation adjustment available. Bring the sights in line with the bore sight and the sights are aligned with the tube at all ranges. The scope itself has a single crosshair up above the sighting chart, distinct and by itself. This crosshair is to match the bore sight at 900 meters. Right and left windage and up or down adjustment are controlled by two dial knobs at the front of the sight. Full adjustment will be described in a later article.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="616" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/034.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16559" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/034.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/034-300x264.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/034-600x528.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Early style RPG-7 optical sight pouch contains spare bulbs, spare batteries, and various lens covers for low light, bright light, and haze, as well as the low temperature battery wire set. Modern sight carriers are molded plastic.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="617" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/035.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16560" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/035.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/035-300x264.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/035-600x529.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Low temperature battery wire set allows the operator to remove the battery from the optical sight and use it remotely. The battery fits inside the operator’s shirt pocket to keep body heat on the battery. The wire connects the battery to the optical sight. It is somewhat awkward but an excellent solution to low light/ low temperature situations. Don’t forget that the sight has an adjustment for low temperature aiming as well.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Controversial Optical Sight</strong></p>



<p>Optical sights are controversial because there are several schools of thought on this unit, and it does in fact take a lot of training and live fire practice to use the RPG-7 let alone the optical sight. SAR will be covering the sighting in depth at a later date. Suffice it to say that using this unit requires extensive training.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="691" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16564" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037.jpg 691w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-296x300.jpg 296w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-600x608.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-100x100.jpg 100w" sizes="(max-width: 691px) 100vw, 691px" /><figcaption>Russian/Soviet-style sight reticle. Note that the tank height is defined at 2.7 meters. This is an average of NATO and Warsaw Pact height tanks, and the operator should be aware at all times what the enemy tank heights really are and adjust accordingly.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="691" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16566" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-1.jpg 691w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-1-296x300.jpg 296w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-1-600x608.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/037-1-100x100.jpg 100w" sizes="(max-width: 691px) 100vw, 691px" /><figcaption>Chinese family optical sights have two tank height stadia. The left stadia labeled 3.0 meters is for US tanks, and it has a second, lower line for gauging the distance of human targets with the Chinese bounding frag round. It is also used for smaller vehicles. The right stadia labeled 2.3 meters is for Warsaw Pact style tanks. The Chinese also added a straight line stadia at the bottom for gauging distance using the length of a tank.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="641" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/038.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16568" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/038.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/038-300x275.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/038-600x549.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>This illustration shows the effect of crosswind on the flight of an RPG-7 grenade. It is the opposite of what one might think, and the opposite of the M72 LAW rocket. While the RPG-7 rocket is firing, the grenade turns into the wind, it does not drift with it. This is due to the location of the turbine and the fin stabilizers. Once the rocket motor has burned out, drift sets in and the grenade will travel with the wind. Distance obviously matters a lot in the planned point of aim, and the operator has to take into account where the rocket will burn out.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="508" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/039.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16569" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/039.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/039-300x218.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/039-600x435.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Percentage of hit comparison with 0 wind and 7 mph wind. This illustrates why in crosswind situations at longer distances, the operator will be concentrating on where the first round hits, because he will likely need to refine his aiming for a back up shot.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Advice is frequently given that an operator should immediately throw away the optical sight because it is too complicated for combat conditions. This is good advice if the operator is not going to receive a lot of the proper training; novices should stick to the iron sights. However, most RPG-7 operators are dedicated to this job and do receive a lot of training. If that is the case, the optical sight gives many advantages. Combined with a modern laser range finder, the optical sight can truly extend the range of the RPG-7 from its &#8220;point-blank&#8221; designated 300 meters to a full 500 meters, depending on wind conditions.</p>



<p>Again, experience with live fire is critical to the RPG-7 operator&#8217;s accuracy. In the US, it is difficult to get this experience due to our importation laws on explosives and the fact that the US military has a very wise policy of not allowing the firing of captured ammunition of this type. (In the event that there are US end users reading this who need to arrange live fire training outside the US, please see me after class. &#8211; Dan)</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="508" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/040-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16572" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/040-1.jpg 508w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/040-1-218x300.jpg 218w" sizes="(max-width: 508px) 100vw, 508px" /><figcaption>Understanding the basic RPG-7 Anti-Tank Round</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>The Wind Thing</strong></p>



<p><strong>RPG-7 Rounds</strong></p>



<p>There are many, many rounds on the market today. SAR will cover these at another time. For our purposes, we are going to take a look at the basic HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank) round: the PG7B.</p>



<p>1) At the joint between the expeller charge and the rocket booster that is permanently part of the grenade, is the section that initiates the firing sequence. When the firing pin strikes the primer (located in the small threaded hole on the center side in this photo, but primer is missing) the primer ignites a train of events. Immediately the expeller charge to the left in this photo is ignited. The pyrotechnic pellet in the rocket booster is ignited when enough forward momentum has compressed the spring to the right in this photo, driving a second primer onto a fixed firing pin. This is a timed and blocked event- the rocket motor ignition delay is separated from the primer flash channel by solid aluminum. The pellet burns in a set time to ignite the rocket booster when it reaches 11 meters in front of the launcher.</p>



<p>2) When the primer ignites, the expeller charge is fired off by the black powder in the center of the expeller tube. The expeller main charge propellant is double base NC/NG placed evenly around the central tube, in between the folded stabilizer fins. This is all wrapped with impregnated cardboard and a glued, waterproof tissue. This section is extremely vulnerable to moisture, so it is important to only remove from the carrying case just prior to firing. The expeller in an RPG-7 is now in an expansion chamber that is larger than the 40mm tube, so the expanding propellant gases rapidly build pressure and exert it onto the grenade.</p>



<p>3) At the rear of the expeller charge is a hard foam plug. As pressure builds in the expeller chamber, the grenade has forward pressure on it and eventually this plug breaks up and the parts of the plug and any unburnt cardboard are expelled out through the venturi and the blast cone. Directly in front of the plug is an aluminum turbine that imparts rotation immediately as the grenade shaft leaves the expeller chamber and tube.</p>



<p>4) As the grenade leaves the RPG tube, it has been “boosted” out by the expeller charge. Forward motion allows the four stabilizer fins to extend out to the sides, and it is important to remember this when firing as there must be at least 8 inches of clearance above all obstacles in the flight trajectory. This is also a good time to point out another reason not to install the expeller cartridge onto the rocket and carry it around. If this is bent or damaged then the entire trajectory may be thrown off. The pyrotechnic pellet will burn through to ignite the rocket booster, as long as the spring held block is out of the way due to proper forward momentum. Propellant gases begin the booster action at 11 meters from leaving the tube of the launcher.</p>



<p>5) The rocket motor burns and the gases push forward into the nozzle block expansion chamber at the front joint just behind the grenade body. This chamber has six holes that point to the rear and outward, and the pressure from the gases blows out the seals and the six holes drive the grenade assembly forward during its assisted flight. It is important to note that the holes are canted in a direction opposite that of the rotation imparted by the fins. The spin rate imparted by the four fins is slowed after rocket ignition. This prevents overspin, and reduces spin degradation of the shaped charge on firing. Just behind the nozzle block is an elastic ring that holds the RPG-7 round in the launcher so slight downward firing is possible without the round coming forward and misaligning the primer and firing pin. When the rocket burns out, forward momentum keeps the grenade airborne until it reaches a target or approximately 900 meters where the safety fuze causes the nose cone area to explode. This does activate the shaped charge, although this author has observed many RPG-7 rounds that reached the five second mark, the safety detonated, and the shaped charge was still intact.</p>



<p>6) Cutaway view of the shaped charge. The piezo-electric nose fuze fires a spark plug system at the rear of the shaped explosive content. As the detonation wave moves through the explosive, the tin coated copper cone at the center is transformed to a high-speed, high-temperature jet of metal that penetrates up to 13 inches of steel armor.</p>



<p><strong>Arming</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="225" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/041.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16573" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/041.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/041-300x96.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/041-600x193.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Above Left:  Standard PG-7 nose fuze cover in place. Cover should not be removed until directly before firing, and whether the fuze cover and safety is removed before loading or after loading is local command doctrine. For a single operator it is easier to remove the cap and safety pin before loading. The fuze is rated to be safe for a three meter fall.  Above Center:  Remove the safety pin using the pull tape. Retain pin and cap in pocket in case of having to remove and store the grenade. Re-install in the same manner. Many operators keep a couple of sets of cover and safety pin in a front pocket, and simply discard the covers as they are used so they don’t have to be concerned under combat conditions about whether they have a cap and safety should they need it.  Above Right:  PG-7 grenade nose fuze ready for firing. The fuze contains direct pressure piezo electric firing as well as timed fuze self destruct capabilities. Some modern designs have a grazing hit feature.</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Firing sequence</strong></p>



<p>Firing the RPG-7 series of weapons is considered a two man operation: the operator and assistant gunner. Both should be proficient with the system and should have a lot of live fire training. The skills needed to hit a target with an RPG can not be gained from simple training drills, especially firing at longer ranges. When the RPG team is &#8220;hunting,&#8221; it is just as important to figure in attempting to conceal their position and the backblast signature from the enemy as it is to find good front cover. In the case of needing a second shot, the backblast will frequently have located them for the enemy. Aiming so that the rear of the RPG-7 is pointed around the corner of a large building or hill can help with this. A couple of safety points should be emphasized. Behind the tube, for about 30 meters, there is a 70 degree danger zone. Close to the tube is a kill zone. The operator and his A-gunner should always be ensuring that there are no obstacles, walls, etc within 2 meters behind the RPG. Good advice would be to make that at least 3 meters. Blastback can be quite deadly. Firing from inside a small room is to be discouraged. We at SAR have been told that there exists a video clip of an Iraqi insurgent firing an RPG-7 from a third floor window with the backblast hurling him forward out the window. If you have this clip, please forward it to us. It contains sage wisdom for all potential operators.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="355" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/042-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16577" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/042-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/042-1-300x152.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/042-1-600x304.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>This graph gives a good rule of thumb for the operator. Modern RPG=7 rounds all have self-destruct fuzes, and the fuze is set to go off at approximately 900 meters, or five seconds of flight time.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The operator and A-gunner will have worked together and developed their own method of communicating these sequences, but it is advisable for the A-gunner to be on the left of the operator and reach across to load. This may not always be practical, but it is part of many countries&#8217; training doctrine. Using today&#8217;s quality range finders is very important, as accurate range distance should increase first round hit probability. Once the pair have stalked their target, found range and target speed, and set up the firing position, the following sequence of events should occur:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>A-gunner visually clears the tube, then prepares the rounds to be fired, attaching the expeller charges.</li><li>Operator ensures the push through safety is to the right and the hammer is not cocked, then announces &#8220;Load&#8221;.</li><li>A-gunner loads a round into the tube, ensuring the index is properly occurring and the elastic gasket is snugly in place holding the round in the tube, then visually examines the backblast area for friendlies, to ensure there is no danger to the rear, and to ensure that various and assorted Operator and A-gunner appendages are out of the blast area. He announces &#8220;Clear to fire&#8221;.</li><li>Operator announces &#8220;Ready&#8221; and the A-gunner removes the fuze protector and arms the grenade (this may have been done before loading). A-gunner resumes watching backblast area for friendlies and gives warning to the operator if the situation changes.</li><li>Operator cocks the hammer, takes careful aim, pushes the safety to the left, then, squeezing the trigger, he fires. The operator then analyzes shot effect and decides whether to reload and repeat, or to depart the area with all due haste.</li><li>In the event of a misfire, the operator announces &#8220;Misfire,&#8221; then pushes the safety to the right and &#8220;On,&#8221; announces &#8220;Safe&#8221; and the A-gunner makes a fast visual inspection to see if the grenade was properly indexed or not. High probability in a misfire will be that the grenade was not properly seated. If that is the case, the A- gunner then immediately reseats the grenade and initiates checks. Operator fires again. If the grenade was in place, then the A-gunner should pull the grenade forward and visually inspect the primer for a hit. If no hit, try again. If there is a dented primer, then the grenade should be gingerly moved away from the area and left for EOD (on the range) or blown in place at the first opportunity if in the field.</li><li>If there is another misfire, then the A-gunner removes the grenade and inspects the primer. If there is no hit on the primer, then there must be a full check done on the pistol group and firing pin. The A-gunner should re-install the fuze cover and safety pin, then remove the round and unscrew and store the expeller charges and grenades in their carry cases. Under no circumstances should the expeller charges be left attached to the grenades and carried around. The reasons for this should be clear from the discussion of how the rounds work.</li></ul>



<p><strong>Defending against the RPG</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="427" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/045.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16581" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/045.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/045-300x183.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/045-600x366.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>View of cutaway RPG-7 HEAT round. On the right, the outer ribbed cone is the standoff, and it creates the outer path of the ignition circuit that continues the entire length of the warhead. Just underneath it, observe the inner cone that creates the inner electrical path. The space between them is an open air insulator area. This is the section that chain link fence defenses are intended to fracture, short circuit and disrupt.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>A couple of quick notes on defending yourself against RPG-7 attacks. Unfortunately, for most vehicles it is not practical to put up any fencing around the vehicle. Perhaps the best defense is high speed and evasive maneuvering. Don&#8217;t drive one constant speed or straight path. The other helpful hint goes to suppressive fire &#8211; keep their heads down. If you are hit, remember that a back up shot will probably be coming soon &#8211; within 8-12 seconds.</p>



<p>When an RPG-7 is fired towards your position, there are three basic signatures. The first and second are simultaneous: the flash and 30 meter blast area behind the operator&#8217;s position, and the flash to the front of the operator (minimal). The third is that approximately 11 meters in front of the operator, there will be a larger puff of smoke where the rocket motor kicks in. This is generally quite visible and a good basis for aiming return fire. If you are in the line of fire, just aim back into the area and suppress. If you are oblique to the line of fire (e.g. the RPG was firing at a vehicle in front of you) aim back 11 meters from the puff and put the hammer down on your guns.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="467" height="700" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/046.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16582" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/046.jpg 467w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/046-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 467px) 100vw, 467px" /><figcaption>In this cutaway view, we can see that the firing pin at rest does not enter the tube, and when it does, the proper firing pin protrusion that it is capable of. This does not mean this is the proper firing pin protrusion when firing, just that it has not been interfered with. Since the hammer is under its own momentum when it strikes the firing pin and not under hammer spring pressure, the firing pin receives just enough pressure to solidly strike the primer. This obviously can not be seen in a complete launcher, but a quick view from the front looking down the empty tube towards a light surface will show whether the pin is operating properly. Press the firing pin in from the hammer view to ensure there is spring resistance. If no resistance, replace the spring.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>During the Vietnam War, US forces began building portable fencing structures on their vehicles. This was chain link fence or very tight barbed wire. The goal was two fold. First, the fence could catch the round in mid-flight, holding it and keeping it away from the vehicle. If the round then detonates it will not penetrate the armor. Most RPG-7 rounds are designed as shaped charges, so they need to be approximately two inches from the surface of the target when they go off, or they are ineffective. Rounds that have a self-destruct fuze will explode 5 seconds after firing, even if trapped in defensive fencing. This is a danger to soldiers who are unprotected. While the AT rounds are not designed as anti-personnel, there can be enough fragmentation and blast to kill or cause other casualties to those near the explosion. The second reason for the fencing is due to the manner in which the traditional RPG-7 rounds operate. There is a double cone in the front of the stand-off area. The space between the two cones is intended as the path for the peizo electric fuze to ignite the main fuze on the shaped charge. It is quite effective, but if the round strikes the fencing and this cone area is distended and broken, the fuze can&#8217;t operate. Newer rounds have a bypass system in place so the best the defender can hope for is to hold the round in fencing, away from the skin of the vehicle, when it explodes. Damage to unprotected personnel can be expected. In the event that the nose fuze strikes a strand of the fence, the round will detonate away from the vehicle, nullifying the shaped charge effect.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="372" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/047-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16587" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/047-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/047-1-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/047-1-600x319.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>The firing pin plug is squared into its well when properly threaded into place. This is on an RPG-7D.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Armorer&#8217;s Hints for the RPG-7 Series and the RPG-2</strong></p>



<p>Disassembly of the RPG series at the operator level is confined to removal of the trigger group, the heat shields, scope, and performing inspection and maintenance on these items. There are a number of cleaning tools supplied including a large brush and swab. The interior of the tube is chromium lined but needs frequent cleaning during use due to the corrosive nature of the powder in the expeller charge, as well as how the expeller charge operates. The charge has paper, foam, and burning propellant that is supposedly expelled through the venturi and to the rear, but on occasion particles remain that can either block the next round from being properly inserted, or lead to corrosion. Once the tube is cleaned, a very, very, light coat of oil should be applied internally.</p>



<p><strong>Firing Pin</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image is-style-default"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="448" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/048.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16588" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/048.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/048-300x192.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/048-600x384.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Firing pin plug has been threaded out using a common wrench. Damage can be seen on the plug from previous operators using improper tools that slipped off. The plug should be replaced in this condition. A very light coating of anti-seize compound should be applied to these threads.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="370" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/049.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16591" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/049.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/049-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/049-600x317.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Left to Right: Firing pin plug, firing pin with spring, firing pin cup. All parts should be inspected for wear, chipping, or breakage.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The firing pin location and projection are key to the operation of these systems &#8211; and are very basic. There is a double headed pin with a barrel body, which is held in a well in the bottom side of the launcher. One pin is smaller and is the firing pin. The other larger diameter pin is for the hammer to strike. The firing pin hole in the body is aligned with where the primer on the grenade body should be. Any misalignment or change in the extension of the firing pin into the primer will affect the reliability of the firing sequence. The firing pin is held in position by two pieces: a cup that is replaceable and locates the pin in the well, and a threaded plug that holds it into the well. The plug has a hole in it that mirrors the firing pin hole, allowing the striking end of the firing pin to face the hammer. The central body of the firing pin has a spring coiled around it, which keeps the firing pin from entering the firing pin hole unless the hammer has struck it.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/050.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16592" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/050.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/050-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/050-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Tip for reassembly: Once you have the cup, the firing pin and spring, and the plug in place, and have started threading the plug in, use a pin punch to ensure the firing pin can travel all the way in. Then, holding the punch in place, thread the plug in around it. Snug the plug square and just beyond hand tight.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Disassembly of Trigger Group</strong></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/051.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16596" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/051.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/051-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/051-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Trigger group from RPG-7V circa 1966 being removed by pushing the split take down pin out, then rocking the assembly downward.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="298" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/052.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16597" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/052.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/052-300x128.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/052-600x255.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>View from the rear of RPG-7 trigger group showing the push through safety extended on the left side. This is the “Fire” position.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Most shooters will recognize the internal parts design from numerous single shot hammer fired rifles and shotguns. The design is not unusual. The group is held in position by a fixed lug at the rear and a push through split takedown pin at the front. In the case of the B-40, the front is frequently held in by a screw. There are other variations and removal should be obvious by what method is used. There is a push-through trigger blocking safety, and the hammer is manually cocked. Once cocked, the safety is engaged; left to right from the operator&#8217;s view is &#8220;Safe&#8221; and pushing through from right to left is &#8220;Fire.&#8221; This can be accomplished using the inside of the index finger, which rests in that area when holding the grip. When the hammer is cocked, the sear engages it and holds it under spring tension from the hammer spring. Once the safety is off, and the trigger pulled, the hammer moves rapidly upward under tension, but it is the momentum of the hammer itself that causes it strike the firing pin. The hammer spring is mechanically kept from forcing the hammer all the way to the top of its cycle. There would be too much force in that case, thus the mechanical block. The cycle repeats.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="638" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/053-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16599" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/053-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/053-1-300x273.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/053-1-600x547.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>With the hammer in the fired position, remove the four flat head screws in the side panel and remove the side panel.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="457" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/054.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16601" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/054.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/054-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/054-600x392.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Remove the sear (flat spring) from the top of the group using a flat head screwdriver. Remove the grips from the group by unscrewing the single screw at the center of the grips.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Disassembly is in the following manner, with one exception. The early RPG-2 and B-40 type trigger groups may have the pin hole for the hammer spring removal in such a manner that the pivot and spring must be removed under pressure. Early armorers had a program to drill out a straight well so that once contained under pressure, the spring could be removed in that contained state and replaced on reassembly.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="404" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/055-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16605" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/055-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/055-1-300x173.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/055-1-600x346.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Trigger group with grips removed has been placed in a soft jaw vise for ease of disassembly. It is entirely possible to do this by hand, but the safety in particular requires three hands or a very experienced touch. 1: Hammer spring / Pivot removal well, 2: Hammer Spring, 3: Hammer Pivot, 4: Push through safety, 5: trigger retaining pin, 6: Trigger, 7: Sear, 8: Hammer.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="594" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/056.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16606" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/056.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/056-300x255.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/056-600x509.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Removal of the sear, if not done before putting in the vise.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="567" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/057.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16608" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/057.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/057-300x243.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/057-600x486.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Remove the trigger pin. It is a one headed pin that can only be inserted in one direction.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="464" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/058.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16610" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/058.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/058-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/058-600x398.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Depress the hammer about half way until the hole in the hammer pivot rod is below the base of the spring, in the removal well. Insert a pin punch or improvised tool into the hole, locking the spring in a compressed condition. This takes spring pressure off of the hammer.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="566" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/059.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16611" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/059.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/059-300x243.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/059-600x485.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Lift the hammer off of its pivot and remove it.</figcaption></figure></div>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="534" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/060.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16612" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/060.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/060-300x229.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/060-600x458.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Remove the hammer spring on the hammer pivot rod. Leave this held under tension for re-installation. If it is necessary to remove the spring, then use a vise and it is possible to re-install this by pressing against the edge of a table, but if possible, make a tool from small pipe with a channel in the side, then compress in a vise and insert a pin to hold the spring under tension. There is a standard tool for this in the operator’s kit, but it is frequently lost or tossed to save weight. Bad move. The tool is quite handy.</figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="500" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/061.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16613" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/061.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/061-300x214.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/061-600x429.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Remove the safety and the detent and spring under it. On re-assembly, the spring and detent go into place, insert a flat head screw driver from the back of the group and hold the detent under pressure, while sliding the safety into place &#8211; pushing the screwdriver out of the way in the process. The safety is held in on one side by the rear wall of the trigger group, and by the removable plate on the other side.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="517" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/062.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16615" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/062.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/062-300x222.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/062-600x443.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Slide the trigger out of the trigger well. Reassembly is the reverse of these steps &#8211; always put the trigger in first, then the safety and detent.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="455" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/063.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16616" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/063.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/063-300x195.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/063-600x390.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>RPG-7V trigger group disassembled.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="525" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/064.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16618" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/064.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/064-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/064-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Soviet RPG-2 trigger group. Note that the pin hole has been elongated to allow for the removal of the hammer spring under tension.</figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="499" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/065.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-16619" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/065.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/065-300x214.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/065-600x428.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption>Chinese RPG-2 trigger group. Note that the pin hole has been elongated to allow for the removal of the hammer spring under tension.</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Send questions to: Raffica sareview@aol.com<br>Or mail to Small Arms Review Attn Raffica<br>631 N. Stephanie St #562<br>Henderson, NV 89014</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N3 (December 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. SERVICE WEAPONS USING .30-06</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/u-s-service-weapons-using-30-06/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1 (Oct 2006)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benet-Mercie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board of Ordnance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Swebilius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chauchat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Model 1895]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt Vickers M1915]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranston Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN-D BAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Hammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henri Mercie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotchkiss Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotchkiss Portative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iannamico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isaac Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Browning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krag-Jorgensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Benet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1903 Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1905]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1917A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1918A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1919A6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1941]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlin Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Model 1889]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Model 1900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin M Johnson Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meuse-Argonne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MG42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model of 1914]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model of 1917]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Westinghouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pattern 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potato Digger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert G. Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Island Arsenal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sac-Lowell Shops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Arms Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Maxim Model of 1904]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V10N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vickers Sons & Maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner & Swasey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=4439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Robert G. Segel, Frank Iannamico &#38; Dan Shea U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903 The U.S. M1903 Rifle was designed and adopted to replace the Krag-Jorgensen rifle and its .30-40 cartridge. Adopted on June 19, 1903, the M1903 Rifle was chambered for the Model of 1903, .30 Government Cartridge (.30-03), which had a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By <strong>Robert G. Segel, Frank Iannamico &amp; Dan Shea</strong></em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="190" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11575" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104-300x81.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-104-600x163.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30 Model of 1903</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. M1903 Rifle was designed and adopted to replace the Krag-Jorgensen rifle and its .30-40 cartridge. Adopted on June 19, 1903, the M1903 Rifle was chambered for the Model of 1903, .30 Government Cartridge (.30-03), which had a 220-grain round-nose projectile. The Model of 1903 Rifle was only in service a short period of time before some changes were made. One of the most prominent upgrades was the rechambering for the improved Model of 1906 cartridge, which had a lighter, spitzer-type projectile and an improved powder. A newly designed M1905 rear sight was also added. The rifles were manufactured by Springfield Armory and Rock Island Arsenal from 1903 until 1914. Production was quickly resumed during 1917 with the U.S. entry into World War I.</p>



<p>The M1903 Rifle in .30-06 caliber remained the standard service weapon of the U.S. until the adoption of the M1 Rifle in 1936. During World War II, production of the M1 Garand was not able to keep up with the wartime demand. Thus, Remington Arms was awarded a contract to resume manufacture of the M1903 Rifle. During production, there were many new features implemented into the original design of the ’03 rifle to speed up production. These rifles were designated as the M1903 (Modified). Subsequently, more improvements were made resulting in the M1903-A3 model, which was adopted on May 21, 1942. The 03-A3 had many stamped parts, a new receiver mounted aperture rear sight and a longer hand guard. The L.C. Smith &amp; Corona Company was awarded a contract in February of 1942 to supplement production. The M1903 and its variants remained in service until declared obsolete on July 24, 1947.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="677" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11576" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147-300x290.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002-147-600x580.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. Maxim Model of 1904 was the first rifle caliber heavy machine gun approved for use as the standard service type by the U.S. Army in 1904. The Army was interested in the Maxim as early as 1887 and procured examples of the “World Standard” Maxim Model 1889 and Model 1900 for evaluation. After sporadic testing, the Chief of Ordnance finally gave approval for adoption in 1904. The first order for 50 guns and tripods were manufactured by Vickers, Sons &amp; Maxim (VSM) in England in the U.S. caliber .30-03.</p>



<p>The Ordnance Department wanted the gun to be made in the United States and enlisted Colt to manufacture the gun. Problems arose and it was several years before Colt could begin production. In the meantime, another forty guns were ordered from VSM. Colt finally began production in 1908. By 1908, the service cartridge had changed from the .30-03 to the .30-06. The ninety guns produced by VSM were all converted to the new service cartridge while all the Colt guns were manufactured in .30-06. Colt produced 197 guns, and with VSM’s 90 guns, total production of the Model of 1904 was 287 guns. Colt never produced any tripods. All the tripods were made by VSM and wheeled carriage mounts were produced by Rock Island Arsenal.</p>



<p>The Model of 1904 saw a brief service life, quickly being declared obsolete by 1915, yet was widely used and saw service in such distant outposts as the Philippines, Hawaii, Mexico, Central and South America. The gun never saw active combat service, particularly in World War I, being relegated to training purposes.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="311" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11578" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139-300x133.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-139-600x267.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</strong></p>



<p>The Automatic Machine Rifle Model of 1909 is commonly referred to in the U.S. as the “Benet-Mercie.” Laurence Benet was an American engineer who worked for the Hotchkiss Company in Paris, France. He, along with another Hotchkiss engineer named Henri Mercie, collaborated to develop an air cooled, gas operated, lightweight machine gun based on the Hotchkiss Model 1900 heavy machine gun design. The Model 1909 differed from heavy machine guns in that it weighed just 30 pounds and was fitted with a wooden stock with elevation gear and a bipod. It was mechanically modified as to how the breech closed and the feedway and feed mechanism were changed. The gun also had a barrel changing ability, unique at that time. The number of parts to the gun were reduced to just twenty five.</p>



<p>The French adopted the French made Hotchkiss gun in 8mm Lebel and the British adopted it in .303. in 1909 and was known on the Continent as the “Hotchkiss Portative.” That same year, the U.S. Army, after lengthy trials, adopted it as service issue as the Automatic Machine Rifle Model of 1909 and ordered 29 guns from Hotchkiss. The Ordnance Department wanted the gun to be made in the U.S. The rights were secured and Colt and the Springfield Armory were contracted to produce the American version in .30-06. Over the next several years, both manufacturers combined produced approximately 670 guns. The Model of 1909 was issued for service with the Model of 1908 Warner &amp; Swasey telescopic musket sight, originally used for sharpshooter use with the Model 1903 Springfield rifle.</p>



<p>The Model of 1909 was issued to U.S. infantry and cavalry troops from 1909 to 1918 and saw limited tactical use in the landing at Vera Cruz in 1913, all along the Mexican border in 1916 and was used in the defense of Columbus, New Mexico against the sneak attack by Poncho Villa in 1916. Though the British and French “Hotchkiss Portative” version was widely used in World War I, the U.S. “Benet-Mercie” was relegated to training use. It was declared obsolete in 1918 and ultimately replaced by the far superior M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="568" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11581" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125-300x243.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-125-600x487.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Model 1914 Colt Automatic Gun</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Model 1914 Colt Automatic Gun</strong></p>



<p>Invented and designed by John Browning, the Colt Model 1895 Automatic gun was the world’s first practical gas-actuated machine gun. Using a gas-impingement system that operated against a lever that traveled downward and backward in a 170-degree arc underneath the gun, it affectionately became known as “The Potato Digger.” Colt manufactured the gun and was extremely successful in selling the gun world wide in a variety of calibers. The U.S. Navy purchased fifty guns in 1897 in 6mm Lee and another 150 guns in 1898. These guns were used as secondary armament on ships and with naval landing parties and with the U.S. Marines. The gun was also used with some degree of success in the Philippines, the Boxer Rebellion, Mexican border war and the Spanish-American War.</p>



<p>The U.S. Army ordered 100 guns for testing and training in .30-40 Krag. Upon the recommendation of a joint Army-Navy board of 1898 for standardizing arms and ammunition, the Navy rechambered their 6mm Lee to .30-40 Krag, and then they all were changed to .30-03 and ultimately to .30-06. Though the Army, Navy and Marines all used the Colt Model 1895; only the Navy officially adopted the weapon. The Army just continued to buy it commercially as they deemed necessary eventually buying 2,800 guns during World War I. The “Model” designation was a name used by Colt and did not represent acceptance as issue by the Army.</p>



<p>In 1914, Colt modified the Model of 1895 by replacing the heavy, thick permanent barrel with a finned barrel that was easily changeable and became the Model of 1914. It was this version and its variants that ultimately saw use in World War I by a number of Allied nations though relegated as secondary armament and training by the U.S. The gun was used with three types of tripods, basically differing only in height.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="636" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11582" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103-300x273.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-103-600x545.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. began to realize how vastly under-armed in automatic weapons it was and started a new series of tests in 1913 and field trials in 1914. The new, improved version of the Maxim gun, now called the Vickers, was the clear winner. The new British Vickers was redesigned internally to maximize space within the receiver box by inverting the toggle joint and lock, and the overall weight of the gun was substantially reduced; all without sacrificing reliability. In 1915, the Board of Ordnance unanimously approved the type for the Army as the Model of 1915 chambered for the .30-06 cartridge. They immediately placed an order for 125 guns to be made by Colt and in 1916 placed an additional order for 4,000 even though the first order had not yet even been made. When the U.S. entered World War I in April, 1917, not a single Colt Vickers M1915 had been delivered due to production problems at Colt.</p>



<p>Colt made Vickers guns finally became available in late 1917. By mid 1918, Colt Vickers started to be shipped overseas. The first twelve divisions arriving in France were issued the French Hotchkiss Model of 1914. The next ten divisions that sailed for France in May and June of 1918 were equipped with the Colt Vickers. By August, 1918, thirteen divisions were using the Colt Vickers. In all, 12,125 Vickers Model of 1915 ground guns were produced by Colt.</p>



<p>At the end of World War I, the remaining inventory of Colt Vickers were put into storage and held in reserve. They were ultimately sent to Great Britain under Lend-Lease to help guard against German invasion during World War II, especially after the huge losses of equipment at Dunkirk, while British production fought to rearm the British Army. After World War II, the U.S. did not want the guns returned and the British destroyed the remaining inventory.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="467" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11583" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73-300x200.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-73-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>John Browning continued to experiment with different machine gun designs after the introduction of his first machine gun, the Model of 1895 Automatic Gun. He developed a short-recoil, water-cooled gun in 1900 and patented it in 1901. There was no government interest in this prototype and he ceased work on it until 1910 when he made further modifications and improvements to it. Again, there was no governmental interest in the gun.</p>



<p>As the U.S. was being drawn into World War I, the Ordnance Board urgently requested designs for new machine guns. Browning took his heavy water-cooled machine gun along with his new Browning Automatic Rifle to be tested in February, 1917. Both guns tested exceptionally well and the BAR was ordered immediately. As war broke out, another official test occurred in May, 1917. The genius of John Browning shone through with the simplicity of design, reliability and ease of maintenance. Browning’s heavy machine gun was adopted as the Model of 1917 chambered for the .30-06 service cartridge and ordered into production with contracts being awarded to New England Westinghouse, Remington and Colt.</p>



<p>30,089 M1917 Brownings were sent to France before the war ended with 1,168 guns actually being used in the front lines. The first instance of combat usage was in September, 1918 in the battle of the Meuse-Argonne, where, in wet and muddy conditions, the new Browning guns performed exceptionally well with one company firing 10,000 rounds per gun.</p>



<p>The Browning M1917 was to replace the variety of machine guns in American use (British Mk I Vickers, U.S. Vickers Model of 1915 and French Hotchkiss Model of 1914) but the war ended two months later so the Browning actually saw limited use. Yet, Browning’s design was so brilliant that the M1917 and its subsequent variants soldiered on in the U.S. inventory for another fifty years.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="370" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11584" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54-300x159.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-54-600x317.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>Colonel Isaac Lewis began development of the Lewis gun in 1910 based upon a previous design by Samuel McClean. Lewis presented his gun for formal testing in 1912 to the Ordnance Board, which included a “stunt” by firing the gun from an airplane &#8211; the first time a machine gun had ever been fired from an aircraft. The Ordnance Board took a dim view of the “stunt” and during the rest of the trials took particular efforts to find fault with the gun and rejected it claiming it was no better than the already approved Model of 1909 Benet-Mercie.</p>



<p>Lewis then went to Europe where his gun was warmly received and went into production in 1913 at Armes Automatiques Lewis in Liege, Belgium and at the Birmingham Small Arms (BSA) Company in Birmingham, England. Belgium was soon overrun by Germany in 1914 and production continued at BSA who eventually produced 145, 397 Lewis guns during World War I in the British .303 caliber. The gun was widely used to great effect throughout the war.</p>



<p>Savage Arms Company of Utica, New York began producing Lewis guns for a Canadian contract in .303 and the U.S. Army procured 350 guns (in .303) for use in 1916 along the Mexican border. Nevertheless, the U.S. Army still harbored a grudge against Lewis and his gun that dated back to 1912. The U.S. Navy, however, held no such animosity and purchased 6,000 Lewis guns from Savage for the U.S. Marines chambered in .30-06 and it was designated as the Model of 1917. Upon arriving in France, the 5th Regiment of the Marines attached to the 2nd Division, who had been issued and trained with the Model of 1917, had their Lewis guns taken away and were issued the French Hotchkiss M1914 and Chauchat M1915 machine guns. The American .30-06 Lewis guns were turned over to the Aviation Services. The Army in due course purchased 2,500 M1917 Lewis guns but they relegated them to U.S. training. U.S. Model of 1917 Lewis guns saw little or no infantry combat during the war. After the war, the Army discarded the Lewis gun though the Navy and Marine Corps kept it in their inventory until the 1930s.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="217" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11587" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43-300x93.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/008-43-600x186.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Marlin Machine Gun Model of 1917/1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Marlin Machine Gun Model of 1917/18</strong></p>



<p>As World War I heated up, orders for the Colt M1914 increased as well. Colt entered into an agreement with Marlin Arms Company on manufacturing the M1914. Marlin’s designer, Carl Swebilius, worked out an improvement to the operating system that changed Browning’s original “Gas Hammer” style lever action to a straight piston arrangement. The Marlin guns, with the exception of a small run of M1917 trainers, were no longer “Diggers,” the piston in tube arrangement ran along the bottom of the barrel and applied the energy to the bolt system.</p>



<p>This change made Browning’s system easier to adapt into aircraft and vehicles; thus, the M1917 and M1918 Marlin Aircraft Machine Gun designations, and the M1917 Marlin Tank Machine Gun designation. Unfortunately, changing to a straight line piston changed the impulse time and energy, and the early guns had trouble in extraction tearing case rims. Adjustments were made to the design, but not before negative publicity occurred. Marlin had taken the position that the ammunition the Army had did not have strong enough cases and the Army said that the Marlin guns had to work with ammunition that was fielded. In the end, the Marlin M1917 type guns were relegated to aircraft use where there was more control on ammunition quality. Some of the Marlin guns had aluminum radiators on the barrels similar to the Lewis M1917, but most had a bare barrel.</p>



<p>The Marlin M1917 and M1918 machine guns did see combat in U.S. use. During World War II, may were shipped to England for their naval defense.</p>



<p>There were an additional 2,816 of the Marlin Model 1917 that are virtually identical to the Model of 1914 “Potato Digger” made by Colt. These were for training in the U.S. Army, and the main difference was in the location of the belt feed opening.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="184" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11588" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29-300x79.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/009-29-600x158.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong></p>



<p>The U.S M1917 rifle was originally produced as the Pattern 14, .303 caliber “Enfield” for the British. Prior to the U.S. entry into World War I, the British negotiated several contracts with the U.S. firms of Remington, Winchester and Eddystone (a Remington subsidiary), to produce the P14. Collectively, 1.2 million of the Pattern 14 rifles were made from 1916 to 1917.</p>



<p>Upon the United States’ entry into World War I, the U.S. Army faced a service rifle shortage. With the British contracts completed, instead of having the companies retool for the M1903 rifle, the War Department decided to make a few design changes and rechamber the P14 to the U.S. M1906 rimless .30-06 round and the new rifle was ready for production. The U.S. M1917 rifle was officially adopted in April 1917. There were over 2.4 million manufactured from 1917 to 1919 at a cost of $26.00 per weapon.</p>



<p>When World War I ended, the M1917 rifles were prudently placed into storage, after having been rebuilt by various U.S. arsenals. When World War II broke out in Europe, the U.S. and her Allies again faced critical shortages of small arms. The M1917 rifles were pulled from storage and issued to rear echelon soldiers and for training. After the war in October, 1945, the U.S. Army declared the M1917 rifle obsolete. While the U.S. M1917 rifle was more utilitarian then glamorous, it did everything it was intended to do.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="212" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11589" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21-300x91.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/010-21-600x182.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong></p>



<p>As the U.S. was being drawn into the First World War, the Ordnance Board met in May, 1917 to consider for adoption designs for light machine guns and automatic rifles. John Browning had been previously working on a gas-operated, magazine fed, true automatic rifle design and submitted it to the board. It was unanimously accepted by the Ordnance Board and requested that production begin immediately at Colt who had secured the rights. However, Colt was already at peak production and requested approval from the Board for delay in production while they built a new facility in Meriden, Connecticut. Due to the immediate need, the request was denied and the lead manufacturer became the Winchester Company.</p>



<p>The initial contract with Winchester called for 25,000 BARs. They were in full production by June, 1918 delivering 4,000 guns and in July were turning out 9,000 BARs. Colt and Marlin-Rockwell also began production shortly after Winchester got into full production.</p>



<p>By July of 1918, the BAR began to arrive in France and the first unit to receive them was the U.S. Army’s 79th Division and they immediately exchanged their woefully inadequate French M1915 Chauchat machine rifles with the new BAR and began training. In the September 1918 battle of the Meuse-Argonne, the BAR was used extensively. World War I only lasted another two months before ending in November, 1918. Thus, while the BAR was the state-of the-art weapon, it saw limited combat service. Nevertheless, the M1918 BAR was such a fine weapon that it remained as the standard U.S. service automatic rifle after the war and production continued after the war. Of the total 102,125 M1918 BARs produced, Winchester made 47,123, Marlin-Rockwell 39,002 and Colt 16,000.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="324" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11593" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18-300x139.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/011-18-600x278.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong></p>



<p>The U.S. was ill-equipped when it entered World War I in 1917 and was particularly lacking in automatic weapons. With less than 1,100 automatic weapons in inventory, consisting of four types in two different calibers, these guns were needed in the U.S. for training the new army. When U.S. divisions arrived in France, they had no automatic weapons.</p>



<p>The French, at war since 1914, had an arms industry in full force. Thus, U.S. troops in eighteen divisions were issued the French Model 1914 Hotchkiss heavy machine gun and the Model 1915 Chauchat automatic rifle: both chambered in 8mm Lebel. The French quickly developed the Chauchat to fill the immediate wartime need of France and consisted of fabricated steel tubing of standard sizes and stampings. The only parts requiring extensive machining were the barrel and bolt. The long-recoil operation, cheap materials, unorthodox enclosed design and hurried production produced a gun that had poor reliability and worse accuracy. But, it was all that was available.</p>



<p>To help alleviate a two-cartridge supply nightmare, the U.S. asked the French manufacturer, C.S.R.G., to produce the gun in .30-06. Good idea, bad execution. The gun was simple in its design and conversion was easy: change the barrel, replace the semicircular magazine with a detachable box magazine, change the angle of the bipod and change the graduations on the rear sight. However, the already poor reliability of the gun went from bad to worse.</p>



<p>The more powerful, straight cased, rimless .30-06 cartridge was very difficult to extract. With its violent action, the M1918 Chauchat tore the cartridges instead of extracting them and the more powerful .30-06 caused major stress on all the working parts causing failures. Additionally, the gun heated up very quickly causing the action to freeze until it had cooled. Due to the enclosed design, clearing stoppages and jams was almost impossible. The gun, in a single word, was awful.</p>



<p>The U.S. nevertheless quickly adopted it as the Chauchat Model of 1918 and bought and paid for 25,000; taking delivery of 19,241. There is no record of M1918s being used in combat and were relegated to training use. They were so bad, that immediately after the war, the U.S. ordered them to be destroyed.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="654" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11594" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13-300x280.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/012-13-600x561.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</strong></p>



<p>In the rush to supply American troops in World War I, deficiencies in design and manufacturing methods of the Model of 1917 manifested itself quickly in operational use. Many of the problems stemmed from the lack of, or improper heat treating of, key internal parts that included the bolt, barrel extension, accelerator, firing pin, trigger and extractor. Inaccurate manufacturing tolerances also contributed to leaking water jackets at the muzzle cap. The most severe problem was due to the pounding of the breech lock on the breech lock cam causing cracks in the receiver side and bottom plates.</p>



<p>As early as 1919, steps were taken to remedy these problems; the most obvious being welding or riveting a “U” stirrup under the bottom plate and extending up each side of the receiver to strengthen the receiver box. A program was initiated by Rock Island Arsenal in 1936 to covert all Model of 1917 guns with upgrades. Changes included a large, new-manufactured reinforced bottom plate that extended up the sides of the receiver and riveted in place, a new belt feed lever, an improved top cover latch that also incorporated a hold open feature and a new rear sight graduated in yards for the M1 ball cartridge (original Model of 1917 sights were in meters). This improved version of the Model of 1917 was designated as the M1917A1. (The “Model of” designation for U.S. arms was dropped in 1939 and replaced with the letter “M”.)</p>



<p>During World War II, more changes occurred to the M1917A1 that included an improved bolt, the bronze end cap and trunnion replaced by steel, the steam tube assembly was strengthened and the rear leaf sight graduated for the now standard M2 ball cartridge. While almost all Model of 1917s were ultimately converted to the A1 specifications, production resumed from 1936 to 1945 with 55,859 M1917A1s being produced by Rock Island Arsenal.</p>



<p>The M1917A1 was used extensively in both theaters of operation during World War II and continued service throughout the Korean War and the beginning stages of Vietnam.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="263" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11595" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10-300x113.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/013-10-600x225.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</strong></p>



<p>During the interwar period, many attempts were made to improve on the M1918 BAR. The M1918A1 and the M1922 were made in very small quantity, with the basic addition of a bipod being the most obvious change. In 1938-39, serious work was begun on what became the Browning Automatic Rifle, Model of 1918A2. The initial experiments with the bipod were expanded upon, and the bipod placement was moved to the front of the barrel utilizing a new flash hider to secure it. The bipod allowed full rotation of the barrel, which made up somewhat for the loss of traverse due to the forward location.</p>



<p>A second addition was that of a pistol grip which extends slightly below the trigger. The method of firing was changed from select fire, (semiautomatic and fully automatic) in the Model of 1918, to dual rate of fire in the Model of 1918A2. This rate reducing mechanism was initially based on the Belgian FN-D BAR trigger group but was later adapted to a US design. Magazine guides were also added to the front of the trigger guard. The fore end was shortened and a heat shield was added, all to help the cooling process. There was a hinged buttplate to add support from the operator’s shoulder, and the new buttstock design allowed for a monopod stock rest.</p>



<p>Production of the M1918A2 was initially performed by upgrading M1918 and M1918A1 BARs. M1918A2 new manufacturing was started in January of 1943. The M1918A2 BAR served in the US military forces throughout World War II, Korea, and well into the Vietnam War. M1918A2s are still seen in various inventories around the world, obsolete though they are.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="275" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11596" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10-300x118.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/014-10-600x236.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</strong></p>



<p>The success of John Browning’s designs is evident in the proliferation of Browning machine guns used by U.S. and other forces around the world. The end of World War I and the advent of more mobile military forces led firearms designers to confront new problems of portability, and the use of tanks and aircraft compounded this. Browning’s basic design for the M1917 series had morphed from water-cooled to air-cooled as early as 1918, and the first models of 1919 Browning machine guns were basically for aircraft use.</p>



<p>The most prolific of the air-cooled Browning machine guns in rifle caliber was the M1919A4. This final variant was designed as either a flexible mount unit for tank use, or for mounting on the M2 tripod with traverse &amp; elevation mechanism and pintle. Production began with the adoption of the M1919A4 in 1935. At that time, all M1919A2 and other earlier variants were started onto a rebuild program to have the longer 24 inch heavy barrel as well as other modifications. By 1939 the elongated slots in the barrel jacket were changed to the quickly recognizable pattern of 5/8 inch diameter holes.</p>



<p>The M1919A4 served well into the Vietnam War for U.S. forces and is still in use today in various armies around the world, primarily in South and Central America and Africa, although most have been replaced with more modern weapons. The M1919A4 was fielded in .30-06, but it has been issued to various armies in 8mm Mauser, 7.62&#215;51 NATO, 7.65 Argentine, and others.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="234" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11597" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10-300x100.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/015-10-600x201.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</strong></p>



<p>The Browning M1919A6 was conceived as a stop-gap measure to fill a void between the M1919A4 and the BAR. The BAR, while relatively light and portable, did not have the capability of sustained firepower. The M1919A4, while perfectly adequate, lacked the ability to be quickly set up and employed and still required the use of a tripod for stability.</p>



<p>The Infantry Board in 1942 investigated many light machine guns of the time, including the German MG42. While a number of designs were submitted, wartime shortages, production constraints and immediate need precluded the design and production of a superior weapon versus modifying a current production weapon to fill the need. (A bird in hand is better than two in the bush.) Reminiscent of Germany’s decision in World War I to develop a light machine gun from an already existing production gun (the MG08/15 from the MG08), the Infantry Board decided to make modifications to the Browning M1919A4 machine gun.</p>



<p>Beginning in 1943, the gun was standardized as the M1919A6 and featured a removable shoulder stock, a lighter barrel with a different barrel bushing to accommodate a bipod and was fitted with a carrying handle. The gun weighed 12.5 pounds lighter than the M1919A4 mounted on its M2 tripod, and was easily transportable and set up by one man. Other than these relatively minor modifications, the gun was mechanically identical to the M1919A4.</p>



<p>Production of the M1919A6 was by the Saginaw Steering Gear Division of General Motors, who produced 43,479 M1919A6s. A number of M1919A4s were also converted to the M1919A6 configuration. The gun saw wide service in the last two years of World War II and continued to see service through the Korean War and the early years of Vietnam.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="200" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11598" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6-300x86.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/016-6-600x171.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</strong></p>



<p>Development of the M1 rifle began in 1919. Limited funds and the conflicting ideas of many of those involved caused the program to drag on until 1936, when a suitable prototype finally emerged. Original prototype rifles were chambered for a .276 caliber cartridge. However, the weapons were soon changed over to the existing, standard U.S. 30-06 round by order of General Douglas MacArthur. The decision was due in part to the large stockpiles of the ammunition that remained from the First World War. The basic M1 design was continually refined until 1940 when large-scale production finally began.</p>



<p>The gas operated, semiautomatic M1 rifle was the inspiration of John C. Garand, who designed the weapon while employed by the Springfield Armory. During World War II, the M1 rifle was manufactured by Springfield Armory and the Winchester Repeating Arms Company. Approximately 4,040,802 M1 rifles were manufactured from 1937 to 1945. The remarkable M1 design was to have a service life extending long past the conclusion of World War II.</p>



<p>In 1950, the outbreak of hostilities in Korea brought the World War II M1 out of pending retirement. A dwindling supply of rifles dictated that additional M1s would be needed and production resumed. During the Korean Conflict M1 rifles were manufactured by International Harvester, Harrington &amp; Richardson and the Springfield Armory. During the1950s era, approximately 1,427,970 additional M1 rifles were produced, and many more WWII era rifles refurbished. The last M1 rifle was manufactured in 1957.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="135" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11599" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4-300x58.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/017-4-600x116.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2</strong></p>



<p>Immediately following World War I, experiments began on making a high speed air-cooled Browning machine gun variant for aircraft use. The original high speed guns were designed by Colt, and these included the M1918, M1918A1, M1919, and MG40. Each model had its problems, leading to the next variant. Part of the problem was that in going to the newer more powerful M2 .30-06 service cartridge, the cyclic rates went up by percentages in the 20% range. At 1,000 rpm, problem occurrences were magnified.</p>



<p>The final variant of the high speed Browning machine gun is commonly referred to as the “Aircraft Gun” or the “M2”. The prefix “AN” simply stands for “Army-Navy.” There were two basic models of the M2: Fixed or Flexible. The M2 Fixed gun was forward firing only, mounted in the wings or cowling, for remote firing by the pilot on an aircraft. The M2 Flexible gun had a spade grip assembly and was mounted so that an air gunner could engage targets within his traverse area.</p>



<p>The M2 guns were designed so that they could be switched out for feeding from either the right or left sides. This also allowed for the use of a twin mount. Twin M2 Browning machine guns firing at 1,200 rpm each made for a very impressive increase in hit probability in air battles.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="219" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11600" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3-300x94.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/018-3-600x188.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>The M1941 Johnson Rifle</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>The M1941 Johnson Rifle</strong></p>



<p>Designed by Melvin M. Johnson, Jr., the M1941 Johnson was unique for a rifle caliber semiautomatic weapon because it was recoil operated rather than the more commonly used gas operating system. This unique feature made the Johnson rifle easy to manufacture and less prone to gas fouling. The weapon also featured a 10 round rotary magazine that could be topped off with additional rounds. The nomenclature M1941 was a commercial designation as there were no Johnson rifles manufactured under U.S. contracts.</p>



<p>The Johnson Automatics Company subcontracted with the Universal Windings Company to manufacture the weapon at their factory complex located in Cranston, Rhode Island. The company would be known as the Cranston Arms Company. Approximately 30,000 Johnson Rifles were manufactured before production ceased in early 1943.</p>



<p>Although the Marine Corps had chosen the M1 Garand, few M1 rifles were available as wartime demand far exceeded the supply. One feature of the Johnson rifle that the Marines liked was it could be easily broken down. This was considered an asset for their newly formed “Paramarine” battalions where the rifles could be easily carried when disassembled. The Marines procured a limited number of the Johnson rifles for issue to the 1st Parachute Battalion in 1942.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="334" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11601" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1-300x143.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/019-1-600x286.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</strong></p>



<p>Invented and designed by Melvin M. Johnson, Jr., it was his intent that the M1941 Johnson LMG replace the BAR. Despite the light machine gun designation, it really was an automatic rifle like the BAR. Notwithstanding the name game, the M1941 LMG had many unique features. Chambered for the M2 .30-06 cartridge, it had a straight line stock which decreased muzzle rise during full automatic fire; necessitating a high front sight. It was light weight at only about 13 pounds and was very accurate in the semiautomatic mode as it fired from a closed bolt, yet in full automatic mode, fired from an open bolt to assist in cooling and preventing cook-offs from a hot barrel. The magazine well was also unique in that the 20-round box magazine could be topped-off by the addition of single rounds through the right side of the receiver or by five round stripper clips. Additionally, the feed lips were a machined part of the receiver rather than being part of the magazine and thus not subject to deformation. The M1941 LMG also employed a quick change barrel.</p>



<p>The M1941 Johnson light machine gun was never officially adopted by the U.S. but was used by selected units of the Marines and Army. Because BARs were in short supply, the U.S. Marines obtained a small quantity of M1941 LMGs primarily intended for use by airborne units and Marine Raiders which saw combat use in the South Pacific. The Army also acquired some M1941 LMGs for issue to the Army’s First Special Service Force, the OSS and there are unconfirmed reports that they were also used by some Army Rangers.</p>



<p>Though some 10,000 M1941 LMGs were produced by Cranston Arms Company, only a relative few (less than 3 percent) were used by the U.S. with the bulk originally ordered by the Dutch for use in the Dutch East Indies. At the fall of the Dutch East Indies to the Japanese, the remaining guns of the contract were embargoed so as not to fall into Japanese hands and is the reason a number of guns were available to the U.S. as needed.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="189" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11602" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1-300x81.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/020-1-600x162.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</em></figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</strong></p>



<p>The .30 caliber M37 machine gun was a post World War II machine gun variation designed as a secondary weapon for use on combat vehicles and tanks. The M37 differed from the M1919A4 in that it could be fed from either the right or left side by repositioning of a few parts. The top cover also had a new type latch that could be opened from either side. The M37 was generally used as a fixed tank weapon, but was also utilized in the flexible role, primarily by the U.S. Marine Corps. When used in the flexible role, rear sights were added and the weapon was used on the M2 tripod. Among other improvements, the M37 featured a chromed trunnion block, barrel and booster. Many of the parts of the M37 were redesigned and not readily interchangeable with the M1919A4 machine gun. Rock Island Arsenal and Saco-Lowell Shops manufactured the M37 machine gun from 1953 to 1969. The M37C variation was similar to the M37, but used an electric solenoid to fire the weapon, and rather than manually charged, it used a hydraulic system to perform the task. The M37C was used in early helicopter applications, as well as being fitted in the U.S. M48 and M60 tanks.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1903</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Bolt action<br>Overall length: 43.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches, twist right hand 1 turn in 10 inches<br>Weight: 8.69 pounds<br>Magazine: Integral, 5 round capacity<br>Sights: Front: blade.<br>Rear: M1903 ladder type, M1903-A3 stamped, aperture type .<br>Production: Pre-WWII approximately 1,704,779. During WWII 1,415,593<br>Manufacturers:<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;World War I: (M1903) Springfield Armory, Rock Island Arsenal.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;World War II: (M1903-A4) Remington Arms, L.C. Smith &amp; Corona</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Automatic Machine Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1909</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 30 lbs.<br>Overall length: 48.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 25.1 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 400 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 30-round metal feed strip<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,800 yards Warner &amp; Swasey M1908 telescopic sight<br>Production: 670<br>Manufacturer: Colt, Springfield Armory</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Vickers Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1915</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil with muzzle gas assist<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 32.5 lbs. Tripod: 50 lbs.<br>Overall length: 43 inches<br>Barrel length: 28 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round cloth belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 12,125<br>Manufacturer: Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Maxim Automatic Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1904</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil with muzzle gas assist<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 57.5 lbs. Tripod: 80 lbs.<br>Overall length: 44 inches<br>Barrel length: 28.5 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 287<br>Manufacturer: Vickers, Sons &amp; Maxim, Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>M1914 Colt Automatic Gun</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas impingement system<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 35 lbs. Tripod: 56 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41 inches<br>Barrel length: 28 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 400 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round cloth belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,600 yards<br>Production: 25,000<br>Manufacturer: Colt, Marlin-Rockwell</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Lewis Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 25.5 lbs. Bipod: 3 lbs.<br>Overall length: 51 inches<br>Barrel length: 26.5 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 47-round rotating pan magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade protected by ears.<br>Rear: Ladder type graduated to 2,100 yards<br>Production: 8,500<br>Manufacturer: Savage Arms Co.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 30 lbs. Tripod: 53 lbs.<br>Overall length: 38.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,800 meters<br>Production: Approximately 72,000. Wartime 42,750<br>Manufacturer: New England Westinghouse, Remington, Colt.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle Caliber .30, Model of 1917</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Bolt-action<br>Overall length: 46.25 inches<br>Barrel length: 26 inches, twist: left hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 9.187 pounds<br>Magazine: 5 rounds integral box type<br>Sights: Front: protected blade<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable ladder sight<br>Production: Approximately 2.4 million<br>Manufacturers: Remington, Winchester, Eddystone</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Chauchat Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, semiautomatic, long-recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 19 lbs.<br>Overall length: 45.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 17 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 300 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 16-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: V-notch tangent<br>Production: 19,241<br>Manufacturer: C.S.R.G. (Chauchat, Sutter, Ribeyrolle &amp; Gladiator</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Marlin Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917/18</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operated straight piston<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 25.0 lbs.<br>Overall length: 40 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 600 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front and rear sights varied by model and application. Ground guns had similar sights to theColt M1914. Other mountings used a variety of aircraft and anti-aircraft sights.<br>Production: 1917 (Navy): 1,605; 1917/18<br>Aircraft: 38,000<br>Manufacturer: Marlin Arms Corporation, Marlin-RockwellCompany</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30,Model of 1918</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, semiautomatic, gas operation<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 15.5 lbs.<br>Overall length: 47 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable<br>Production: 102,125<br>Manufacturer: Winchester, Marlin-Rockwell, Colt</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1917A1</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Water<br>Weight: Gun: 33 lbs. Tripod: 53 lbs.<br>Overall length: 38.5 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Protected blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,600 yards.<br>Production: 55,859<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Browning Automatic Rifle, Caliber .30, Model of 1918A2</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, gas operation<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 19.4 lbs.<br>Overall length: 47.8 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 300-450/ 500-650 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: Blade.<br>Rear: protected aperture style adjustable<br>Production: 249,380 total new production as A2<br>Manufacturer: New England Small Arms (NESA), 168,363; IBM Corporation, 20,017; Royal Typewriter Company, 61,000</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A6</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 32.5 lbs.<br>Overall length: 53 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt<br>Sights: Front: Folding blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,600 yards.<br>Production: 43,479<br>Manufacturer: Saginaw Steering Gear Div. of General Motors</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M2 Caliber: .30-06</strong><br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 23.0 lbs<br>Overall length: 39.9 inches<br>Barrel length: 23.9 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 1,200 rounds per minute<br>Feed: disintegrating links Sights: Varied according to mounting<br>Production: Brown-Lipe-Chapin 33,311; Buffalo<br>Arms Co. 96,822; Savage 14,800; Colt 49,681<br>Manufacturer: Brown-Lipe-Chapin Div. General Motors, Buffalo Arms Company, Savage Arms, Corporation. Colt’s Patent Firearms Mfg.</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M1919A4</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: Gun: 31 lbs. Tripod: 14 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450-500 rounds per minute<br>Feed: 250-round fabric belt or disintegrating links<br>Sights: Front: Folding blade<br>Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,400 yards.<br>Production: RIA 31,596; Saginaw 367,853; Buffalo 38,300. Total production of all M1919A4 variants from 1939 to 1945: 441,494.<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal, Saginaw Steering Gear Div. of General Motors, Buffalo Arms Co</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Semiautomatic, gas operated<br>Overall length: 43.6-inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches, twist: right hand, 1 turn in 10 inches<br>Weight: 9.5 pounds<br>Magazine: 8 round enbloc clip<br>Sights: Front: Blade with protective ears<br>Rear: Aperture<br>Production: Approximately 5,468,772<br>Manufacturers: World War II: Springfield Armory, Winchester Korean War era: Harrington &amp; Richardson, International Harvester, Springfield Armory</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>M1941 Johnson Rifle</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Semiautomatic, short recoil operated<br>Overall length: 45.87 inches<br>Barrel length: 22 inches, twist: right hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 9.5 pounds<br>Feed: Internal rotary type, 10 round capacity<br>Sights: Front: blade with protective ears<br>Rear: aperture type, graduated in meters<br>Production: Approximately 30,000<br>Manufacturer: Cranston Arms Company</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Model of 1941 Johnson Light Machine Gun</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full Automatic, semiautomatic, short recoil operated<br>Overall length: 42 inches<br>Barrel length: 22 inches, twist: right hand 1 turn in 10-inches<br>Weight: 13 pounds<br>Cyclic rate: 450 rounds per minute<br>Magazine: 20-round detachable box magazine<br>Sights: Front: blade with protective ears<br>Rear: Folding aperture type, graduated in meters<br>Production: Approximately 10,000<br>Manufacturer: Cranston Arms Company</p>



<p>Model:&nbsp;<strong>Browning Machine Gun, Caliber .30, M37</strong><br>Caliber: .30-06<br>Operation: Full automatic, short recoil<br>Cooled: Air<br>Weight: 31 lbs.<br>Overall length: 41.75 inches<br>Barrel length: 24 inches<br>Cyclic rate: 450-550 rounds per minute<br>Feed: Disintegrating links<br>Sights: Added for C Front: Folding blade<br>Added for C Rear: Peep, adjustable leaf graduated to 2,400 yards.<br>Production: RIA 7,340; Saco, unknown<br>Manufacturer: Rock Island Arsenal, Saco-Lowell Shops</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V10N1 (October 2006)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
