<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Small arms data by wire &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/small-arms-data-by-wire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 22:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): May 1998</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-may-1998/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1N8 (May 1998)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1998]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAY 1998]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1N8]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Nick Steadman</p>



<p>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</p>



<p>NEW WEAPONS &amp; EQUIPMENT</p>



<p>DENEL BOLT-ACTION RIFLES</p>



<p>Now that the US/South African arms import/export spat is finally resolved, expect to see initial batches of Denel-manufactured Musgrave-style bolt-action sporting rifles appearing in the U.S.A. We’re told the barrels are particularly good.</p>



<p>H-S PRECISION M700 REM DETACHABLE MAGAZINES &amp; NEW PISTOLS:</p>



<p>H-S Precision in South Dakota has finally introduced its long-awaited detachable magazine and trigger guard housing for Remington M700 rifles. The units are all-stainless and come in four-round short-action (.308” etc) and three-round long-action (Magnum case) versions. Retail price is $145. The company has also launched two Pro-Series 2000P single-shot bolt-action pistols, in Varmint (wide forearm) and Silhouette variants, both based on an H-S Precision stainless receiver, 15” fluted stainless H-S barrel, titanium firing pin and a composite H-S stock (also available separately) which retains the company’s integral bedding bar system employed in the US army’s M24 sniper rifle and Remington M700 Police &amp; Varmint Synthetic rifles. Barrels &amp; receivers are both Teflon coated.</p>



<p>Calibres are .17 Rem, 6mm PPC, .223, .35 Rem, .308, 7mm-08 and 7mm BR. Pistol price is $1,250 (stocks only $245). Tel +1(605) 341-3006, Fax +1(605) 342-8964)</p>



<p>FEDERAL AMMO INTRODUCTIONS</p>



<p>New 1998 ammunition lines from Federal Cartridge include:-<br>&#8212; reduced-recoil 12g &amp; 20g Personal Defense shotgun cartridges (2.75”) with No 2 pellet load.<br>&#8212; reduced-recoil 12g (2.75”) Tactical 000 eight-ball copper-plated buckshot (1,140fps)<br>&#8212; reduced-recoil Tactical 12g (2.75”) Hydra-Shok one-ounce Slug (1,300fps) (also offered on civil market as the Premium low-recoil slug load)<br>&#8212; Premium Tungsten Iron No 4 shot 12g turkey loading (3”) (1,300fps). 1 3/8 ounce<br>&#8212; new Premium Barnes Expander Sabot Slug loads in 12g (2.75”) &#8211; slug is copper-plated HP, one ounce. Designed for rifled tubes. MV 1,450fps. Groups to 2.5” at 100 yds<br>&#8212; .223/5.56mm BallistiClean loads with non-toxic priming &amp; lead-free zinc-core bullets. 40gr soft-point &amp; stranded core versions offered, both suitable for police (&amp; military!) training</p>



<p>.22RF KIT for SIG-SAUER P226</p>



<p>Deutsches Waffen-Journal (DWJ) profiled a prototype model of a new .22 rimfire training conversion kit for the 9mm SIG-Sauer P226 pistol and its German police P6 variant, developed by Schuetzenbedarf &amp; Waffen in Offenbach, Germany. Projected price is DM 1,165. The kit comprises a new blowback Lothar Walther barrel, slide, recoil spring and 10-shot magazine, though our German sources said (at mid-Jan 98) the magazines were not yet available in production quantities. The front underlug of the slide forms part of the barrel in this kit, clearly a measure to boost felt recoil effects. IWM’s tester reported malfunction-free performance in all circumstances, except with some very weakly-loaded indoor practice cartridges (Zimmerpatronen), and recoil with high-velocity .22LR ammunition was not dissimilar to that of 9x19mm. 25 metre rested groups were under 50mm.</p>



<p>(Schuetzenbedarf &amp; Waffen (Oliver Pfeiffer), Siemensstrasse 9, 63071 Offenbach, Germany)</p>



<p>.222 SSS RIMFIRE SYSTEM (MEXICO)</p>



<p>Industrias Tecnos in Mexico, producers of Aguila ammunition, have developed a new .222 SSS rimfire cartridge. One application (there may well be more) is for sniping out to 200 metres. The cartridge comprises a .22 Short case loaded with a long 60gr unplated solid lead roundnose bullet (not hollow-pointed) which brings the overall length of the round to that of the .22 Long Rifle. For sniping, the new round is intended for use in a suppressed .22 precision rifle with 30mm diameter 8x56mm scope. The .22 SSS will apparently penetrate 10-12” of pine wood at 200 metres.</p>



<p>This is not the first time we have seen suppressed .22 rimfire rifles proposed for short-range sniping, though they would not be most people’s first choice. Selection of a 60gr bullet is presumably a device to gain the maximum downrange energy within the limitations of subsonic operation. We guess a high-energy propellant is used to get the necessary results from the diminutive .22 Short case.</p>



<p>BARRETT LIGHTWEIGHT .50 MACHINE GUN</p>



<p>Having toyed with this idea for some years, Ronnie Barrett of Barrett Firearms has finally confirmed it is his aim to start cutting metal on a new lightweight, belt-fed .50 machine gun design of his own, weighing about 35 pounds, by Christmas 1998.</p>



<p>CZECH-MADE M6 SCOUT RIFLE</p>



<p>In West Virginia we briefly examined one of the Springfield Armory M6 Scout rifles nowadays made for the US supplier by CZ Strakonice in the Czech Republic. These are reportedly rather hard to come by just now. The M6 is a rather agricultural-looking weapon, a break-barrel, over &amp; under design with (in our case) the upper barrel in .22 Hornet calibre and the lower in .410 shot. A .22LR/.410 version also exists. Upper or lower barrels are selected by respectively pulling out or retracting a round-headed catch above the external hammer. Spare ammunition is stored under a soft plastic cover in the buttstock. Sights comprise a rear aperture and a blade foresight. The trigger is a horizontal bar underneath the small of the butt, and trigger pull is pretty bad, but recoil is modest, bearing in mind the minimal weight of the gun. The M6 was not tested for accuracy, mainly since it was pitch black outside at the time!</p>



<p>Overall, despite its appearance, the M6 is clearly a useful tool for its intended purpose, and works well. It would be a valuable item to have in the emergency kit of any vehicle, boat or plane. Our hosts had removed the trigger guard on this Scout to allow the gun to be folded to a more compact package, as earlier versions could be. However, the long trigger bar is then in such an exposed position that should the external hammer be cocked before closing the gun there is a chance it could be fired when gripping the butt to close the action. We therefore caution at all times against cocking this weapon until the breech is firmly closed.</p>



<p>CHINESE LIGHTWEIGHT 12.7mm MACHINE GUN</p>



<p>Details have been received regarding the Chinese QJZ89 12.7mm machine gun, which is the result of a lightening exercise apparently earlier applied also to the Chinese Type 77 &amp; Type 85 guns in the same calibre. This QJZ89, a short recoil design, is equipped as standard with day and low light (night vision) optical sights and customarily fires AP and APIT ammunition. New ammunition natures include AP-Fragmentation and saboted AP. Total weight of the system is 26.5kg, which is claimed to be 47% lighter than the Type 77 gun and 27% lighter than the Type 85. It is primarily a ground-to-ground weapon but is also intended for use against helicopters.</p>



<p>SILVA’s FIGHTING KITE</p>



<p>Soldier magazine reveals that military compass suppliers Silva (UK) Ltd have come up with a new survival gizmo &#8211; the 2 square metre Skystreme inflatable kite, made from metallised fabric which is radar-reflective. It can also be illuminated using a Cyalume Light Stick, and comes with a 50m cord. When not required in its primary role, the kite can be worn as a thermal vest or inflated to act as a splint. It compresses into a pocket-sized package when not in use. All in all, it sounds as if Silva has come up with a winner here. But perhaps they should have made it edible too? Silva (UK) Ltd, Tel (01784) 471721. US Distributor is BE Meyers (1-800-327-5648). Manufacturer is Skystreme &#8211; http://www/skystreme.uk.net/</p>



<p>INDUSTRY &amp; FOREIGN NEWS</p>



<p>UK LARGE-CALIBRE RIFLE TRIALS MOVE TO AUSTRALIA</p>



<p>Soldier magazine in the UK carried an item about the British army trials of .338 and .50 Browning weapons in pursuance of the UK’s Long-Range Large Calibre Rifle (LRLCR) programme. It showed the .338 and (for the first time) .50 rifles from Accuracy International, the .50 PGM Hecate II from France and the .50 Barrett M82A1 semi-automatic, all in snow and temperatures of -30 degs Celsius during Alaskan trials, courtesy of the US army’s Cold Region Test Center.</p>



<p>The report said the weapons (which strike us as a very limited selection) had already been tested in Kuwait, Brunei and the UK; they would now be going to Australia for final trials. We assume these are all locations to which RAF transports already fly at no extra cost. Likely role for the LRLCR, destined to equip the UK’s Joint Rapid Deployment Force, was described as ‘defensive’ &#8211; it was most likely to be used in circumstances where indiscriminate fire was out of the question&#8230;&#8230;which sounds like a roundabout definition of a long-range countersniper weapon.</p>



<p>Clearly, since the army already uses smaller-calibre Accuracy International sniper rifles, there will be a product-loyalty thing going in respect of that producer’s new .50, though if rapid repeat-fire capability is required, the Barrett semi-auto would seem the only answer. But for pure portability the Barrett M95 bullpup would be even better.</p>



<p>BOZ .224 UPDATE</p>



<p>Further to our initial report on Civil Defence Supply’s BOZ .224 cartridge, based on a 10mm case necked down to 5.56mm, we understand that the company’s supply of Carl Gustaf 5.56mm AP bullets is now assured, so CDS will not need to produce its own. The Glock pistol is no longer being pursued as a host for this cartridge, because of difficulties ensuring satisfactory functioning, even with a light alloy slide. The recoil spring also has to be weakened, plus the striker spring, and this produces unreliable ignition. Instead, CDS is going for what it describes as a wide-frame M1911-style pistol frame allied with a linkless camming barrel and SIG-style lockup at the ejection cutout. Jungle wisdom actually suggests the name Tanfoglio. This pistol will be hammer-fired, with DA/SA trigger and decocker. Prototypes are now being made.</p>



<p>Fast rifle powder is still being used in the BOZ round; this provides the precise firing characteristics CDS is after, and faster-burning (pistol) powders would generate excessive backthrust. As at end-Jan 98, Heckler &amp; Koch had yet to provide MP5/10 SMGs for BOZ conversion, but Bar-Sto in the USA will be making the .224 barrels. The testbed weapon for the BOZ conversion of the Colt Commando/SMG has already been seen &#8211; it has a gas block relocated nearer the breech plus a new magazine. Both the new pistols and the SMGs are also still to be chambered for .40 S&amp;W. And CDS is still tinkering with a .40-based BOZ cartridge which would have wide applicability, but this is clearly a second priority.</p>



<p>DUAL STANDARDS</p>



<p>UK Prime Minister Blair is convinced of the efficacy of the UK handgun ban in making the nation a safer place. Or is he? An item in the Police Guardian reportedly states that a special team of 28 armed police bodyguards, issued with all the latest weaponry and day/night sighting systems, has been formed to protect Blair plus his home back in his Durham constituency 24 hours a day. By our reckoning that’s a whole platoon in army terms. The guy must be really popular.</p>



<p>BROLIN ACQUIRES MITCHELL ARMS ASSETS</p>



<p>In answer to the frequent question at the 1988 SHOT Show “Where is Mitchell Arms?”, New Gun Week says that Brolin Arms acquired the Mitchell Arms assets and is to offer Mitchell products itself, with Don Mitchell acting as a consultant.</p>



<p>UK MINE DISPOSAL TO BE ACCELERATED</p>



<p>At the end of Jan 98 the UK Defence Secretary announced an accelerated programme to destroy British stocks of one million anti-personnel mines, which will leave the UK forces with just 4,000 samples, to be used in EOD training. The minister, George Robertson said (and note our italics):</p>



<p>“Getting rid of these evil weapons is one of our main priorities. The Convention allows us four years to destroy them, but I am determined to show our commitment by reaching the target in less than half that time; two years from now. Our action today demonstrates how the UK has set its face against the use of these evil weapons which continue to cause suffering and distress to thousands of people around the world.”</p>



<p>Funny how what were formerly regarded as essential components of the army inventory are suddenly, in politico-speak ‘these evil weapons’, once there’s an international ban in place. Could it be a ‘holier than thou’ contest is upon us?</p>



<p>WHITE BOX 9MM MISFIRES</p>



<p>A professional trainer running shooting courses out West in the USA reports an unexpectedly high misfire quotient with current Federal ‘white box’ 9mm military ball ammunition used in Glock pistols, both new and well-used weapons.</p>



<p>UK SUPPORT WEAPON REQUIREMENT ANNOUNCED</p>



<p>The UK MOD has formally announced its requirement for replacement or enhancement of its 7.62mm NATO GPMG inventory in the Sustained Fire (SF) role, and is now seeking expressions of interest’ from industry by no later than 11 Mar 98. As we have reported before, the MOD is presently looking at MMGs, HMGs, lightweight cannon and automatic grenade launchers, but also welcomes additional ideas. It will require mounts, sights, ammunition and tools with any purchase. Something like 1,000 weapons are planned, to be in service by 2004.</p>



<p>(Contact Contracts Branch CB/ELWS2c, Tel (0117) 913-1375)</p>



<p>AUSTRIAN ARMY TO SHRINK BY 50%</p>



<p>Jane’s News Briefs noted that the coalition partners in the Austrian government had agreed that by the year 2000 the size of the Austrian army would be halved. Presumably this will throw up sizeable surpluses of AUGs.</p>



<p>THE FULL ULSTER TOLL</p>



<p>Gleaned from the Royal Ulster Constabulary statistics for deaths &amp; injuries stemming from ‘The Troubles’, 1969-97</p>



<p>Killed &#8211; 3,234 (including 654 Army/UDR/RIR* and 2,279 civilians)<br>Injured &#8211; 40,652 (including 5,983 Army/UDR/RIR* and 26,144 civilians) (from 1968)<br>Shootings &#8211; 35,458<br>Bombs exploded or defuzed &#8211; 15,003<br>Armed robberies &#8211; 20,199 (from 1971 only)<br>Persons charged with terrorist offences &#8211; 17,802 (from mid-1972 only)<br>Firearms recovered &#8211; 11,395<br>Explosives recovered (kg) &#8211; 114,544<br>(Road deaths 1969-97) &#8211; 6,658<br>(Road injuries 1969-97) &#8211; 263,153</p>



<p>*(nb: UDR/RIR &#8211; Ulster Defence Regiment/Royal Irish Regiment)</p>



<p>The figures may help demonstrate to non-UK readers why Britain tends to look at the terrorist question in a rather different light from the rest of Europe &#8211; and particularly the USA &#8211; where those few domestic attacks that do occur are taken as a national affront and generate major public panic. However, the Ulster traffic accident data does help put even The Troubles in perspective.</p>



<p>30mm AGS-17 BARRETT ADAPTATION</p>



<p>Ronnie Barrett mentioned recently that he had in the past considered adapting his .50 M82A1 semi-automatic rifle, or something very similar, to fire the Russian 30mm AGS-17 grenade-launcher cartridge, but had not proceeded with the idea.</p>



<p>INDONESIAN INSTABILITY THREATENS AUSTRALIA</p>



<p>Asian Age ran an AFP report which said that Australian defence chiefs were considering changes to their regional strategy to take into account the possibility of Indonesia’s President Suharto being deposed in a popular uprising. Hitherto Indonesia had been seen by Australia, its closest neighbour, as a bastion of regional security, but the growing political unrest, levels of violence and the ongoing effects of the Asian financial crisis on the economy there could not be ignored.</p>



<p>EURO ARMS CURBS ATTACKED</p>



<p>Radio &amp; press reports, including an AFP item run by The Asian Age, cited reactions to initial European Union discussions on the Anglo-French draft uniform code for approving arms exports. A key provision is the clause seeking to ensure that no EU country approves exports to a destination declined by another without first consulting the other state, but this is diluted by other terms which allow countries to do pretty much what they like in their own political or economic interests. Also, though the code seeks to deny arms exports to recipients who might use them for ‘internal repression’, there is another letout allowing sales of kit to protect security forces &#8211; a pretty wide definition.</p>



<p>Some human rights organisations would prefer there to be a presumption that goods will not be exported, with sellers having to make a persuasive case to prove why this presumption should be overridden, however this seems unlikely ever to fly. Press reports noted that the USA, unlike the UK, has since 1994 denied supplies of small arms and riot control equipment to Indonesia, and that loose European policies were at odds with US efforts to bolster controls.</p>



<p>M16s KILLED TURKISH GALIL DEAL?</p>



<p>Jane’s Foreign Report said that Israel lost the chance of selling the IMI Galil rifle to re-equip Turkish forces when visiting military staff from Turkey spotted that Israeli troops they met all still had US-made 5.56mm M16s.</p>



<p>THANKS FOR THE GUNS, BOSS</p>



<p>An AP item run by The Asian Age said that 243 prisoners at a jail in Honduras escaped, armed with stolen Kalashnikovs, after rioting and overpowering their guards. Sounds like a very good argument for not storing large quantities of firearms in prisons.</p>



<p>SINGLE 30mm GUN MOUNTING REPAIR CONTRACT</p>



<p>The UK MOD is to invite tenders for the repair of spares &amp; sub-assemblies for the Single 30mm Gun Mounting. Dates still to be advised. Contact phone number (UK) is (0117) 913-9611.</p>



<p>FMS ON THE WANE</p>



<p>Defense News produced statistics to show that the US DoD’s Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programme was shrinking steadily as more and more countries were resorting to direct purchasing instead.</p>



<p>CALCUTTA &#8211; POLICE WEAPONS UNSERVICEABLE</p>



<p>The Asian Age said that police in Calcutta have such a poor choice of weapons that they are vulnerable to terrorists active in this Indian city. The police were described as equipped largely with WW2 ‘muskets’, most of which are ‘beyond repair’ and a danger to the users. There are also a few rifles in each police station, plus Webley and S&amp;W revolvers. Officers visit the range just once a year.</p>



<p>COLOMBIAN BODY ARMOUR BOOM</p>



<p>In a previous issue we highlighted the £8.6m set aside by Colombian politicos for 1998 to provide themselves with ballistic vests, armoured vehicles &amp; bodyguards. Business Week has since profiled the ballistic protection business in Colombia, where violent deaths are running at 30,000 a year and there are thousands of kidnappings. One firm, Miguel Caballero Ltd, specialises in stylish armoured fashion clothing with concealed ballistic panels. It designs and armours all its own garments, which come complete with holsters, if required.</p>



<p>Caballero’s products are composite-armoured, using Kevlar &amp; Twaron combined with Spectra to achieve weight savings of up to 50%. Prices range up to $1,000 for rifle-level protection. They also do minefield boots and apparently even had a query concerning armour to wear under a monk’s habit (is nothing sacred?). The company’s sales reportedly rose from $90,000 four years ago to $440,000 in 1996, and could hit $1m in 1997. Exports have boomed, with garments going to the USA, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Russia &amp; South Korea.</p>



<p>FIRE FROM COVER WITH CLAWS</p>



<p>Jane’s Defence Weekly spotlighted the Compact Lightweight Armoured Weapon Station (CLAWS) developed by Kollmorgen and ordered by Turkey for trials on amphibious APCs. The system allows top-mounted weapons to be fired remotely via a CCTV monitor, with the operator remaining under cover. The report says CLAWS can be used to mount the .50 M2HB HMG, the 7.62mm NATO M60 GPMG, the 40mm Mk19 automatic grenade launcher and other weapons, including cannon. A photo was shown of a 40mm Mk19 with CLAWS on a Turkish APC. If required, the mount can also be stabilised independently of vehicle movement.</p>



<p>BULGARIANS MAKING DRAGUNOV</p>



<p>Our east bloc advisers tell us that Kazanlac Arsenal in Bulgaria is now making the Dragunov SVD sniper rifle, only in the original 7.62x54mm calibre.</p>



<p>NAGAS HAVE CATHOLIC SELECTION OF ARMS</p>



<p>A photo from India run by The Asian Age showed members of the Khaplang faction of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) forces toting an RPG, an AK, M16A1s, an M1 Carbine, an unidentified belt-fed GPMG plus an SMG bearing quite a close resemblance to the 9mm Uzi.</p>



<p>NO PISTOL TRAINING FOR MARINES</p>



<p>A letter in the US Navy Times from a USMC captain complained that Marines are not taught anything about the 9mm pistol either in boot camp or during combat training. He guesses this might have some bearing on the high incidence of negligent discharges, wounding and deaths from mishandling of pistols. We guess he’s probably right.</p>



<p>ASIAN SLUMP WILL HIT ARMS SUPPLIERS</p>



<p>The Observer reported that Western arms manufacturers were getting worried at the implications of the widespread Asian slump, which was already reflecting in cuts to defense budgets in Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines &amp; Thailand. Clearly this is a major potential blow to those arms-producing countries who have been relentlessly pursuing Asian customers to make up for the Cold War ‘peace dividend’ and the reduction in Middle East business. Maybe they should have been equally attentive to their clients’ long-term ability to pay?</p>



<p>SOUTH AFRICAN NTW-20 FIRES 40mm GRENADES TOO</p>



<p>A simple single-shot conversion now allows the South African NTW-20 anti-materiel rifle to fire the 40x53mm high-velocity grenades used in the Mk19 automatic grenade launcher. Recoil is said to be similar to that of the 20x82mm cartridge round which the rifle was designed. The full list of calibres the NTW-20 can fire is now 20x82mm, 14.5x114mm, 12.7x99mm, 12.7x108mm and 40x53mm. The conversions reportedly take less than 30 seconds to effect.</p>



<p>NANKOU (CHINA) SHOOTING RANGE COMPLEX</p>



<p>Foreign press reports focussed on the various delights offered by the China North International Shooting Range, an ex-army facility an hour outside Peking. Here, during the last ten years, 80,000+ visitors &#8211; both Chinese and foreign &#8211; have been able to hire and fire weapons in all calibres from pistols, rifles (they have M16s too, as well as AKs) &amp; SMGs through to GPMGs &amp; heavy machine guns. Prices for using all but the ‘exotics’ are said to be very modest. Additional attractions include anti-aircraft and anti-armour launchers. The reports said there are plans to open a laser combat range and to allow visitors to fire weapons from armoured vehicles and aircraft. Whatever the Putonghua expression is for “Take Cover!”, we guess it’d be an idea to memorise it before going, once those trigger-happy turistas get airborne. You can just see the headlines now &#8211; ‘Salt Lake senior Wilbur (78) levels Forbidden City’.</p>



<p>USMC OFFICER ARGUES FOR RIFLE CHANGES</p>



<p>Writing in the Marine Corps Gazette, one Capt. Robert Gibbs argues that the time has come to consider some changes to the design of the combat rifle. Using the M16A2 as his case study, he singles out for criticism its iron aperture sights, mechanical trigger mechanism and overall dimensions.</p>



<p>Gibbs, listed as a competitive shooter and match coach, describes the aperture &amp; post aiming procedure as ‘contrary to human nature’ and suggests optical devices such as the Aimpoint, Ultradot and the screen-based Bushnell Holosight would be preferable, the last having the added benefit of eliminating the tunnel vision aspect of squinting down a scope tube. As to triggers, Gibbs suggests an electronic triggering mechanism might be a way round the problem of poor trigger control, which he says is responsible for missed shots. To overcome potential electrical problems he considers there might still be a backup mechanical trigger.</p>



<p>Talking about weapon size, Gibbs says the M16 is excessively long, and points to the Steyr AUG bullpup as a better all-round solution. This apart, he suggests that novel rifling profiles and faster-burning powders could give better performance from shorter barrels even in conventionally configured rifles. Gibbs highlights the acceptance of a need for change already embodied in the ongoing CQB (compact) Weapon and Modular Weapon projects in the Marine Corps, both involving the addition of extra facilities for ‘bolt-on goodies’. He suggests that the simplest solution is for improved triggers and provision for optics to be absorbed into existing programmes such as these.</p>



<p>In fact, it would appear that most of Capt. Gibbs’ points are already being addressed. Flat-topped, short M4A1 carbines already exist with US SOCOM, designed specifically for use with scopes &amp; reflex sights. As to triggers, we are not persuaded that electronics would make very much difference in combat shooting, where shots will inevitably be snatched anyway, and much firing is in short bursts, with ‘accuracy’ in bullseye-shooting terms a consideration well secondary to just hitting the target &#8211; with something.</p>



<p>M240Bs to 82nd AIRBORNE</p>



<p>Army magazine in the USA reported that the 7.62mm NATO M240B (a locally-made variant of the FN MAG 58 GPMG), which is the US army’s official replacement for the Saco M60, had been issued to infantry battalions (on a scale of 18 guns each) of the 82nd Airborne Div at Ft Bragg. The item said that whilst the complete M240B equipment with tripod weighed ten pounds more than the M60 with similar accessories, the M240B tripod has a recoil-absorbing gun mount and a universal sight rail. Barrel changes are also claimed to be easier.</p>



<p>As will be evident from the limited scale per battalion, the M240B is intended to be employed in what the UK calls the Sustained Fire role (US &#8211; Medium Machine Gun), i.e. as a true machine gun. US infantry squad automatic fire support requirements are the role of the 5.56mm Minimi (M249 SAW). The same source said that the 30mm M230 cannon already mounted on the Apache is to be fitted to some of the US army’s 160 Special Ops Aviation Regiment MH-60 Black Hawk helicopters. A new Black Hawk M230 mount has been developed by Picatinny Arsenal’s ARDEC research centre.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V1N8 (May 1998)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMALL ARMS DATA BY WIRE (SADW): NOVEMBER 2002</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-november-2002/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 01:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V6N1 (Oct 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman Issue No 61- June 2002An Electronic Publication from:NICK STEADMAN FEATURESTel : 01273-773362,International +44-1273-773362Fax: 01273-822078,International +44-1273-822078SADW@compuserve.com KASHMIRI PEN PISTOL: the Asian Age (13 Jun 02) ran an AP/PTI photo of a pen gun captured from a dead member of the Jash-e-Mohammed insurgent group in Kashmir. It was fairly crude, with a black barrel [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>By Nick Steadman</strong><br><br>Issue No 61- June 2002<br>An Electronic Publication from:<br>NICK STEADMAN FEATURES<br>Tel : 01273-773362,<br>International +44-1273-773362<br>Fax: 01273-822078,<br>International +44-1273-822078<br>SADW@compuserve.com<br><br>KASHMIRI PEN PISTOL: the Asian Age (13 Jun 02) ran an AP/PTI photo of a pen gun captured from a dead member of the Jash-e-Mohammed insurgent group in Kashmir. It was fairly crude, with a black barrel which unscrews in the middle for loading like a conventional pen. There is a pocket clip and the cocking-piece is an unusual pyramid-shaped knob at the top end of the pen above the pocket clip. A quarter of an inch or so above the central joint are two double gold bands about a third of an inch apart. Calibre is .25 Auto, which we imagine would be painful to fire in such a device.<br><br>SA80A2 MAGAZINES MARKETED FOR OTHER WEAPONS: we note that Heckler &amp; Koch Inc in the USA is now offering the new 30-round magazines which the company developed at the UK MOD’s behest for the upgraded 5.56mm SA80A2 rifle and LSW. This would appear to firmly knock on the head recent rumours circulating in the UK that the A2 magazine was not suitable for other NATO 5.56mm weapons (as is required by NATO STANAGs).<br><br>The new magazine has a steel body &amp; follower and weighs 250 grams. H&amp;K points to the magazine’s success in the SA80A2 reliability &amp; durability trials, which took place in arctic, desert &amp; jungle conditions and involved 500,000 rounds. The company claims that US military and police users also say it is the best and most reliable magazine available for the M16/M4 family.<br><br>IMI TAR-21 TAVOR SPOTTED ON OPERATIONS: a Los Angeles Times news update of 20 Jun 02 on Israeli forces re-entering Jenin in the West Bank was accompanied by a photo of one soldier armed with an TAR-21 Tavor bullpup, so we can safely conclude that these weapons are now being deployed, though to what extent we don’t yet know. It doesn’t actually make a whole lot of sense, other than to make work for the order-strapped IMI, since the Israelis could get more M16s or M4s from the US for little or nothing anytime they wanted.<br><br>NEOSTEAD SHOTGUN UPDATE &#8211; AND SOME ADP NOTES: we recently met once more with the Neostead shotgun team from South Africa. These 12-shot ‘pump-forward’ bullpups are currently in low-rate production over there &#8211; parts for an initial 1,000 weapons have been procured, and the guns are being built under Truvelo’s manufacturing licence in batches of 100.<br><br>Of the very first batch, at least 50 have now been sold; customers so far include Italy, the Philippines and TV companies, and one determined US dealer already has an import licence, possibly for collector sales.<br><br>Chief markets at present are seen as Africa, the Far East, Middle East &amp; Latin America, and the US commercial market, which is still stymied by import restrictions (see previous issues) is well down the list, but Neostead is confident it can sell the entire first 1,000 guns without having to depend on US custom. The wholesale price is US $700.<br><br>One aspect which may in future be emphasised rather more in the Neostead sales drive will be the suitability of the gun for less-lethal applications, since a different ammunition nature can be loaded in each of the gun’s twin magazine tubes.<br><br>The company’s US legal problems would evaporate immediately if the gun was to be made in America, and &#8211; as it happens &#8211; Neostead is currently in negotiation with a major US gunmaker about the possibility of a licenced manufacturing deal. Other outcomes, like the sale of the entire data package, with or without parts or parts kits supplied by Neostead from South Africa, would also be considered. More on this in a couple of months time.<br><br>We gather meanwhile that ADP pistol designer Alex du Plessis, likewise in South Africa, is also talking to a US manufacturer about a new manufacturing partnership now that his licencing deal with Heritage Arms has come to an end. And we also understand that the ADP, in common with many other pistols these days, has now been modified to incorporate an integral keyed safety lock. Another of du Plessis’ activities, by the way, is making polymer frames for Wilson Combat pistols.<br><br>As hardnosed cynics, it’s rare that we single out products for special praise, but the reliability of the South-African made 9mm ADP appears to be exceptionally high, even when abused, and it put the stylish but undependable Denel CP-1 we also tested a few years back to shame.<br><br>Both pistols have a similar gas-braked mechanism, but the utilitarian ADP went on and on like the Duracell bunny, even if left uncleaned, and pretty much regardless of the ammunition used, while the much glitzier CP-1 repeatedly malfunctioned. Stylishness is not something one should ever worry about with a personal weapon; the only real criterion is whether the thing will fire every time you haul it out.<br><br>The gun trade nowadays often reminds us of the car industry &#8211; every year more minor styling changes, just to boost sales, but these ‘enhancements’ actually add little or nothing to the product’s inherent usefulness.<br><br>RUSSIANS OUTSOLD USA ON ARMS IN 2001: according to the prestigious Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), over the five year period 1997-2001, the value of US arms transfers totalled $44.82 billion, of which the 2001 figure was $4.56 billion.<br><br>While the US remained the top arms exporter, the Russians, in second place, increased their exports by 600% over the same period, for a total of $17.35 billion, and in 2001 they actually beat the USA with $4.97 billion, an increase of 24% on the prior year.<br><br>China was the biggest recipient of arms in 2001, up 44% from 2000, and India’s arms imports climbed by 50% to reach third place. Saudi Arabia, Taiwan &amp; Turkey were the other main recipients over the five-year period.<br><br>Though Washington typically still leads the pack, US arms exports have actually dropped by 65% since 1998 (original sources AFP/IHT, 14 Jun 02 and SIPRI).<br><br>SOLOMONS &#8211; 450 POLICE GUNS STILL MISSING: ‘Rebels who stole about 500 military-style weapons from authorities two years ago returned only about 50 of them during a gun amnesty&#8230;..Peace monitors said the amnesty, which lasted several weeks and ended at midnight Friday, was a partial success in that nearly 1,650 old or homemade weapons were turned in. The Solomons&#8230;..have been wracked by violence since a coup in June 2000 when militants broke into a police armory and stole hundreds of high-powered guns.’ (AP, Honiara, Solomon Islands, 1 Jun 02)<br><br>USMC SEEKS NEW COLD STEEL: National Defense (May 02) reported that the USMC is looking to buy over 100,000 new bayonets to replace their M7 models, which reportedly date from the 1960s, but the Corps hasn’t yet figured out exactly what characteristics are required. However, the weapon selected will combine the roles of bayonet and combat knife. So it’s goodbye to the trusty old Ka-Bar then?<br><br>Apparently it was planned to award a non-competitive contract to Eickhorn in Germany last year, but the subsequent storm of protest from US firms has now compelled the USMC to invite 17 companies to compete for the order. The intention is to purchase an off-the-shelf design.<br><br>There is a lot of mythology about bayonets. We recall that even during WW1, which was reknowned for its suicidal bayonet charges, actual bayonet wounds were so rare that they were listed among miscellaneous casualties, which we believe were only around 2% of the total.<br><br>While there is probably a case for having a bayonet on the end of a bullpup to extend the soldier’s reach, there really is little or no justification for these blades on any other weapons. They belong to a fighting concept which has been obsolete for many decades.<br><br>The USMC cites a new emphasis on CQB training, in which the bayonet is allegedly required to play a part, but this is rather misleading, since even in Afghanistan (one of the theatres quoted as an example) there has been very little close contact &#8211; nor does this jive with the current push to avoid friendly casualties at all costs. We’re also rather forgetting the M9 pistol here &#8211; and the old favourite, the butt stroke &#8211; always assuming the M16-series weapons will take the abuse.<br><br>What the Marines should be looking for, first &amp; foremost, is a capable field knife; if they insist it also be suited to clipping on the end of an M16 or M4 barrel, so be it, but this should not be allowed to compromise its primary role.<br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Here is a small sampling of a few of the July 2002 SADW articles. You can contact Nick at the email above, and make arrangements with him to obtain the full service sent directly to your email address. In order to receive SADW your e-mail system must be capable of receiving attached files, and the e-mail software system or settings do not reject files as large as 400kb. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V6N1 (October 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire: October 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-october-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 02:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N1 (Oct 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By<strong> Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. You can contact Nick at the email above, and make arrangements with him to obtain the full service sent directly to your email address. In order to receive SADW your e-mail system must be capable of receiving attached files, and the e-mail software system or settings do not reject files as large as 400kb. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br><strong>FNMI 7.62mm POLICE RIFLE:</strong> one new ‘fusion product’ born out of the acquisition of USRAC (aka Winchester) by FN Herstal in Belgium is the FN 7.62mm NATO Special Police Rifle, recently written up in The Accurate Rifle &amp; elsewhere. Not to be confused with the old FN Sniper rifle from Herstal itself, this weapon comes from FN Manufacturing Inc (FNMI), the US subsidiary of FN, and comprises a pre-64 (controlled feed) Winchester Model 70 action mated to a chrome-lined modified MAG-58 barrel and a composite HS-Precision Pro Series ‘bedding bar’ stock.<br><br>The action has been squared up, there’s a four-round detachable magazine, a three-position safety catch, adjustable trigger, the barrel length is 26” and the weapon weighs nearly ten pounds empty. It looks less meaty than the Remington PSS police rifle, so may be better for those with smaller hands. Evidently it shoots very well, with half-inch groups reported at 100 yards, and is available to private purchasers as well at only $675 (scope &amp; mounts you’ll have to find yourself).<br><br>Best of all, with that chromed barrel the thing will probably keep on shooting forever like the Duracell bunny and be something Junior will eventually be compelled to inherit, which we imagine will be no great hardship.<br><br><strong>NEPALESE ARMY RIFLES:</strong> recent coverage of the protests in Kathmandu following the assassination of the Nepalese royal family suggest that Nepalese troops have some Indian 5.56mm INSAS rifles, an indigenous Indian design manufactured by the Ishapore plant. Reuters pix we’ve seen so far don’t provide a perfect view, but from the front end of the weapon shown it’s clear it is either an INSAS or a Galil, which look almost identical from the muzzle to the gas block. However the tapered handguard strongly suggests INSAS rather than the Galil, which has a more blocky handguard.<br><br>Given Nepal’s proximity to India, the INSAS would also make more sense, though if we’re correct in our identification it’s interesting that Nepal has already managed to obtain export weapons when India has had real trouble keeping up with INSAS demand from its own forces.<br><br>In fact, it’s still quite rare to see Indian units armed only with INSAS; most still appear to carry a mix of FALs, INSAS and AKs. Also, in the pix of Nepalese troops we also spotted what appear to be a 7.62mm G3 and a possible AK47, a mix which, as in India, presents a few challenges on the logistics front.<br><br>Incidentally, those thoroughly bad boys of Hamas, who have been giving the Israelis such a hard time lately, are no slouches in the small arms sphere &#8211; we spotted one guy armed with a pretty new-looking M16A2, with double mag clip &amp; upmarket black web sling with shoulder-pad, fitted with a long commercial rifle scope. With his finger on the trigger, we might add&#8230;.maybe he’d heard Sharon was visiting.<br><br><strong>SAA AT MAXIMUM RANGE &#8211; TERMINAL BALLISTICS:</strong> IWM (now SWM) in Switzerland recently published some maximum range data (firings at 32 degrees elevation) from Swiss wound ballistics expert Beat Kneubuehl. The comparisons between military calibres were particularly interesting, as in:<br></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>a. .223 FMJ (weight 3.56g, MV 960m/s) &#8211; max range 2,800m, terminal velocity 98m/s, terminal energy 17 Joules, terminal energy density 0.72, angle of descent 70 degs</li><li>b. 7.62x39mm FMJ (weight 8g, MV 710m/s) &#8211; max range 2,710m, terminal velocity 99m/s, terminal energy 39 Joules, terminal energy density 0.86, angle of descent 67 degs</li><li>c. .308 Win FMJ (weight 9.5g, MV 830m/s) &#8211; max range 3,900m, terminal velocity 122m/s, terminal energy 70 Joules, terminal energy density 1.54, angle of descent 65 degs</li><li>d. 7.5mm Swiss GP11 (weight 11.3g, MV 750m/s) &#8211; max range 4,900m, terminal velocity 143m/s, terminal energy 116 Joules, terminal energy density 2.62, angle of descent 61 degs</li></ul>



<p>(all of which suggests the 7.5mm Swiss, still relatively unknown outside that country, is a pretty powerful little number) also, compare the rifle data above with 9x19mm:-</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>e. 9mm Luger (weight 8g, MV 350m/s) &#8211; max range 1,710m, terminal velocity 80m/s, terminal energy 26 Joules, terminal energy density 0.4, angle of descent 65 degs.</li></ul>



<p>Kneubuehl points out that in order for a human target to escape injury, energy density (Joules per square mm) must be clearly below 0.1 for skin and 0.03 for eyes, which puts rather a new gloss on the wounding potential of ‘spent’ projectiles. All the above projectiles vastly exceed these figures.</p>



<p>Even for airgun &amp; shotgun pellets, the figures are significant, as below:-</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>f. 4mm shot (weight 0.38g, MV 420m/s) &#8211; can injure skin to 210m and eyes to 280m</li><li>g. 4.5m (.177) airgun pellets (weight 0.53g, MV 180m/s) &#8211; can injure skin to 170m and eyes to 240m</li></ul>



<p>All something to consider in the context of the favourite American New Year pastime (now the subject of widespread crackdowns) of banging off towards the stars with no great regard for where the resultant bullets may ultimately land.</p>



<p><strong>WOMAN SHOT WITH BEANBAGS DIES:</strong>&nbsp;the Los Angeles Times reported on 24 Jun 2001 that an 89-pound woman who was suffering from a stomach ailment died after being shot with two rounds of beanbag ammunition by police in Long Beach (California).</p>



<p>The woman had reportedly been keeping police at bay with an eight-inch knife and was shot when she declined to drop the weapon. The beanbags were fired from a 12g shotgun at a reported range of 30-35 feet and struck the woman in her arm and torso, though her boyfriend claims the range was only 10-15 feet. The LA Times reported separately that &#8211; according to a county coroner’s spokesman &#8211; the woman, Glenda Lee Reymer (49), died of a “severe, focal blunt force trauma to the chest.”This is not the first fatality involving beanbags in recent months, and the time may well have arrived when these particular ‘non-lethal’ weapons need to be seriously reappraised.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N1 (October 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): August 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-august-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 01:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N11 (Aug 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex du Plessis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammunition Industries Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangalore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheyenne Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CheyTac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian Defence Industries Organisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Criminal Intelligence Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neostead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Military College of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truvelo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N11]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Here is a small sampling of a few of the May 2001 SADW articles. You can contact Nick at the email above, and make arrangements with him to obtain the full service sent directly to your email address. In order to receive SADW your e-mail system must be capable of receiving attached files, and the e-mail software system or settings do not reject files as large as 400kb. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.<br><br><strong>NEOSTEAD SHOTGUN UPDATE</strong>: the first batch of Neostead bullpup shotguns (see previous issues) will hopefully be ready in Oct 2001. Meanwhile Neostead has added a third member of staff &#8211; Alex du Plessis, the ADP pistol designer, who will be advising on manufacturing aspects. Negotiations are also under way with Truvelo, which manufactures the ADP, to assemble the Neostead guns, possibly using Truvelo barrels (which are the controlled items of firearms under South African law). Du Plessis reportedly also has some new ideas for sniper rifle designs, which could also become part of the new working relationship with Neostead.<br><br>As far as the US market is concerned, Neostead has asked BATF for guidance on whether the shotgun could be sold in the USA (to civil and/or police markets), either complete or imported as parts. A reply is still awaited. If a parts kit was the chosen route, the receiver would be unfinished, in order to comply with US controls, and the barrels would be sourced in the USA. We gather at least one US manufacturer may now be interested in making the Neostead guns from scratch or importing the parts for assembly, and that this relationship could also be a springboard for some of Du Plessis’ rifle designs.<br><br>Despite a lot of superficial interest, Neostead had no luck in the past putting together any concrete deals with US manufacturers, but we always anticipated the tune might change once production guns were imminent. And indeed, so it now seems. Retail price of the Neostead shotgun will still be rather steep at about US$1,000, but it’s worth pointing out that this is a complex gun to make, and the cost of production in South Africa is already around $650, so &#8211; taking distributors’ &amp; dealers’ markups into account &#8211; the margins are by no means unreasonable. Furthermore, the $1,000 retail price point still compares quite favourably with that of other speciality shotguns, such as the USAS-12, and anyway &#8211; if you’d be perfectly happy with a budget-priced Mossberg, Remington or Winchester, you probably don’t need a Neostead.<br><br>Du Plessis is also, by the way, the designer of the ambidextrous magazine-fed Truvelo ‘Mega Sniper’ bolt-action .50 Browning rifle currently shown in Jane’s Infantry Weapons, though Truvelo also offers a single-shot bolt-action .50, reminiscent of the McMillan, which was shown at this year’s IWA exhibition in Nuremberg. The locking mechanisms apparently differ, the repeater having two rear locking lugs in addition to the pair at the front of the bolt.<br><br><strong>LAND WARRIOR SAVED BY FUEL CELLS?</strong>: a late Apr 2001 item in the Guardian suggests that help for the black box freaks of the US army’s Land Warrior programme is now at hand, in the form of a sub-two pound fuel cell the size of a paperback novel developed by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington, and said to be able to provide 25 watts of power for a week. If so, this would represent a quantum leap ahead of all the current battery options, which require replacement every 12 to 24 hours, ruling out extended patrols without daily resupply. The fuel cell will use aviation spirit or diesel to produce hydrogen which is combined with oxygen to generate the power. 2003 could see it available for testing, by which time the Land Warrior bill to US taxpayers is expected to have risen to $2,000,000,000.00. Enjoy!<br><br><strong>.408 CHEYENNE TACTICAL LONG-RANGE TESTS:</strong> Dr John Taylor’s .408 Cheyenne Tactical (CheyTac) Intervention rifle (see previous issues) has recently undergone long-range test-firing at Arco (Idaho) (elevation 5,300 feet) to validate the ammunition design. A Leupold Mark 4 16x40mm Mil-dot scope sight was used.<br><br>Some notes from these .408 tests follow:-<br><br>a. 17 Apr 01 &#8211; using the 419gr projectile at an MV ‘in the low 2900s’, sub-MOA groups were obtained out to 1,500 yards in strong gusty wind. Both 1:12” and 1:13” twist barrels were tested, the 1:13” being preferred on account of the MV, which is 150fps higher.<br><br>b. April 18, 2001:-<br><br>&#8211; at 1,900 yards &#8211; 3-shot group of 19 inches with 2 of the 3 shots 4 inches apart.<br><br>&#8211; at 2,100 yards &#8211; 3-shot group of 30 inches with 2 of the 3 shots 10 inches apart. Mirage starting to build up.<br><br>&#8211; at 2,200 yards &#8211; mirage too intense to see target.<br><br>c. April 19, 2001 &#8211; the 419gr projectile appears still to be supersonic at 3,000 yards, as opposed to 1,900 to 2,300 yards for the .50 BMG; however problems were experienced shooting decent groups beyond 2,300 yards due to uneven downrange wind conditions, and Taylor had resolved (after the tests recorded in this report) to redesign the chamber to advance the bullet in the lede and increase the MV to 3,000 fps, hopefully improving the wind-bucking capability as well as inherent accuracy.<br><br>d. April 20, 2001 &#8211; 39-inch groups were obtained at 2,300 yards, in gusty winds, with near-perfect elevation and only lateral (wind) dispersion.<br><br>e. April 22, 2001 &#8211; elevation was claimed to be perfect out to 3,000 yards, but with horizontal dispersion still a problem.<br><br>f. April 23, 2001 &#8211; Taylor established that the bullet goes transonic between 3,300 and 3,400 yards. This and other ballistic characteristics are to be verified later at Yuma Proving Ground using doppler radar instrumentation.<br><br>Taylor also has plans to try to reduce the weight of the Intervention rifle (currently 23 pounds without scope) by up to four pounds, and to improve stability by moving the bipod to 12 to 14” ahead of the receiver (it’s currently located at the front of the receiver). http://www.cheyennetactical.com<br><br><strong>SANDIA’s WARP-SPEED ACCELERATOR COULD HAVE GUN POTENTIAL:</strong> A Daily Telegraph item in late Feb 2001 gave details of Sandia National Laboratory’s Z Accelerator, christened ‘the fastest gun in the West’, which the paper said uses 20,000 amps of electrical power to accelerate small metal discs to 45,000 mph. Sandia’s website adds that the Z accelerator is the world’s most powerful X-ray machine, part of the Department of Energy’s research programme to design an accelerator fast enough to simulate nuclear fusion, avoiding the need for underground testing of the real thing. Substitute materials such as titanium &amp; copper were reportedly needed to stop the aluminium projectiles liquifying under the severe forces involved.<br><br>Apparently another possible application of this technology could be to fire spacecraft out of the Earth’s gravitational field. The performance so far (albeit with a tiny projectile at a range of only a few feet) is already three times what that mission would require, though one assumes that &#8211; when suitably scaled-up &#8211; the launch system would be a monster, consuming horrendous amounts of electricity. Other roles could, it’s claimed, include hypervelocity battlefield guns. It’s also being used to assess the likely damage to space exploration vehicles from ‘space junk’ impact, and for studying how materials behave under extreme conditions.<br><br><strong>APOBS FOR SURVIVABLE BANGALORE OPS</strong>: OK, so now you’ve all seen ‘Saving Private Ryan’ at least twice, and watched all that nasty barbed wire being blown up, you all know what a Bangalore Torpedo is, right? Defense News said that the old WW2-era M182 Bangalore was, amazingly, still in US Marine Corps service, but would be supplemented from Autumn 2001 by APOBS, aka the Anti-Personnel Obstacle Breaching System. As you’ll know from the movies, the chief problem with the Bangalore is finding some poor schmuck (well, a whole team of ‘em, in fact) to rush out under withering fire, connect and ram ever more 13-pound sections of the thing towards the obstacle and then light it, most of ‘em dying in the process. It’s an ideal job for someone who’s thoroughly tired of life. We recommend platoon commanders first use up any of their troops who’ve received ‘Dear John’ letters in the past 24 hours.<br><br>However, with APOBS, a rocket drags a line charge with a six-second delay fuze over the obstacle and is finally braked by a parachute, whereupon it detonates, reportedly clearing a safe path two feet wide and about 50 yards long. Furthermore, APOBS can also be remotely fired by cable. Only one major downside &#8211; the darned thing apparently weighs 130 pounds and needs two men to cart it around, which is likely to make it rather unpopular. Also, Defence News noted that because APOBS detonates on the surface of the obstacle rather than (as with a Bangalore) beneath or inside it, results may be less reliable. This, people, is the price you pay for casualty avoidance, which is obviously one of the aims. At the risk of repeating ourselves, no pain, no gain.<br><br>IRANIAN AMMUNITION OPTIONS: Miltech in Germany listed the lines offered by the Ammunition Industries Group (AMIG) of the Iranian Defence Industries Organisation (IDO), including:-<br></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li> 5.56x45mm</li><li> 9x19mm</li><li> .38</li><li> .40 (presumably .40 S&amp;W)</li><li> .45</li><li> 7.62x51mm</li><li> 7.62x39mm</li><li> 7.62x54mm rimmed</li><li> 12.7mm (NATO or Russian not stated)</li><li> 1” signal cartridges</li><li> 1.5” anti-riot cartridges</li><li> Commercial shotgun &amp; rifle ammunition</li><li> Primers, cases &amp; other components</li></ul>



<p>AMIG has reportedly been in the ammunition business for over 60 years, and is claimed to manufacture to international standards of quality assurance. As some readers may know, Iran already does a fair job cloning MP5 and MP5K SMGs, plus Webley-Schermuly riot guns, though we don’t expect the Pentagon to be listed among its loyal customers anytime soon.</p>



<p><strong>POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVING 40MM GRENADE LAUNCHER EFFECTIVENESS:</strong>&nbsp;a paper by Royal Ordnance boffins embedded at the Royal Military College of Science (RMCS Shrivenham) claimed that while the range of low-velocity 40mm grenade launchers is around 400 metres, in practice, due to the limitations of existing sighting systems, this was reduced to no more than 150 metres. This is well below the 300-600 metre engagement bracket for rifles, LMGs and anti-armour launchers, with obvious implications for their tactical usefulness.</p>



<p>In particular, poor range estimation was identified as a major culprit in targeting errors with 40mm systems, an aspect not helped by the very low (nominally 75 m/s) MV and rainbow-like trajectory of the grenades. It suggested that, to reduce this mismatch and extend 40mm launcher effectiveness, a number of improvements would help. These could include laser-assisted rangefinding, higher velocity, recoil elimination, airburst &amp; other advanced fuzing, maybe even guided projectiles. At Shrivenham the boffins set up their own ‘synthetic environment’ in their offices, using simulated area (trench) &amp; window targets at ranges to 300 metres, in order to test some of their theories, with a laser rangefinder &amp; magnifying optical sight on the weapon and a head-mounted display worn by the firer.</p>



<p>The host weapon was a modified SA80 fitted with a 40mm H&amp;K underbarrel launcher and control buttons on the handguard, and the whole outfit was integrated with the prototype FIST equipment (UK version of Land Warrior). The tests required the firer to aim using the weapon sight, then lase the target for range data. Eyeballing the target through his head-mounted display he then had to simply align two icons just above his line of sight before finally firing. This technique should theoretically produce 1st round hits.</p>



<p>Claimed results suggested 1st round accuracy improvements of ‘an order of magnitude’ better than for firers using standard equipment and visually estimating the target’s range, but some operators found it took far too long to aim (up to ten seconds) using all this new fire control equipment, nor were all of them happy with the ergonomics.</p>



<p>(nb: this time aspect reinforces our own lingering concerns about the complexity of all Land Warrior systems and procedures detracting from users’ concentration on the urgent tasks in hand &#8211; delivering fast, effective fire and (just as important, if not more so) avoiding that of the other guys)</p>



<p>The modified system performed almost as well as the theoretical expectation against the area target out to 200 yards, though &#8211; despite marked improvements &#8211; the window target results still fell short of the boffins’ aspirations. While vertical round-to-round miss errors with the prototype equipment were only slightly worse than if the range was known in advance and a simpler red dot sight was used, horizontal round-to-round dispersion errors were noticeably greater. Furthermore, firers also found it difficult and slow to accurately lase man-sized targets beyond 250-300 metres. Just don’t ask why, having had the opportunity more than a decade ago to adopt a 40mm underbarrel launcher for use with SA80, the British army chose instead to adopt the much less flexible muzzle-launched rifle grenade, and even then essentially only for Desert Storm.</p>



<p>Despite their obvious advantages, only UK special forces plus some Paras and Pathfinders currently have M203 launchers, used only on M16-series rifles.</p>



<p><strong>UK POLICE ALERTED TO THREAT OF ‘DISGUISED FIREARMS’</strong>: Police Review reported in mid-Apr 2001 that the firearms tracing unit of the UK’s National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) had alerted police in Britain to the existence of ‘disguised firearms’ such as mobile phone guns (see previous issues) and said that this class of weapon was already in circulation in the UK. NCIS says most of these guns, which can also be disguised as flashlights, cigarette lighters or screwdrivers (and don’t forget pen guns!) are being made in Eastern Europe and are very ingeniously designed.</p>



<p>As we commented in a previous issue, some of these ‘guns’ (for example the mobile phones and the twin-barreled Bulgarian Osa pistols) are not actually built as lethal weapons, being intended to fire gas or blank ammunition, but there are clearly backstreet workshops somewhere which are converting them to fire live ammunition, typically .22 rimfire. It was thought some of the mobile phone guns could well be in Britain at this time, and NCIS warned officers to be wary of phones being held in odd ways and, if possible, to check their weight, in case they might actually be firearms.</p>



<p>As we’ve said before, phone guns present a particularly serious security problem, for example at airports, as virtually everyone has a mobile nowadays, and few people ever give them a second thought. The chances of an armed police squad taking out an innocent phone user who may be acting oddly are clearly somewhat greater now, though hopefully not as high as in the US, where (as far as we know) they haven’t even woken up to phone guns yet. Over there, anything in a suspect’s hand tends to prompt a vigorous and often fatal response.</p>



<p>The NCIS firearms tracing system has been set up to hopefully enable the origins of all guns recovered by British police to be identified. It’s hoped this intelligence will also provide clues to the structure of the illegal firearms trade and allow effective action to be taken to tackle the problem.</p>



<p>Footnote: pen guns are another dangerous area, since some of them are extremely well-disguised. One manufacturer we’ve spoken to said he’d been told of at least one instance of his pen guns going through US airport controls entirely unchallenged, though, in fairness, the weapon involved on the occasion described was apparently a non-functional sample. Problem is, in the US passengers usually have the option of emptying their pockets before going through metal detectors. In our experience very little attention is paid to what goes in the little plastic tray along with the keys and change.</p>



<p>On the other hand, if someone is compelled to carry a weapon through controls and then triggers an alarm, we’re sure anything found during the subsequent patdown or manual scan is likely to be scrutinised much more carefully. Separately, we noted from the Charlotte Observer that a man was apprehended in Mecklenberg, North Carolina, in early May 2001 trying to enter the local courthouse armed with a loaded .25 pen gun and a knife. He initially set off the metal detectors and when questioned pulled out the knife, ammunition and the pen, telling the officers it was a gun &#8211; which deputies at the security checkpoint had already figured out. He was apparently only there to pay a traffic ticket, but now he’s facing weapons charges too!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N11 (August 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): July 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-july-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2001 01:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N10 (Jul 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hodgdon Powder Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McBros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N10]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br><strong>NTW RIFLES SOLD TO INDIA:</strong> South African sources tell us that Mechem sold 100 of its 20x82mm NTW-20 anti-materiel rifles (the Tony Neophytou design) to India, complete with 14.5mm conversion kits, but that there were reportedly some problems with the bolts when firing 14.5mm ammunition, requiring rectification back in South Africa. All is apparently now well. Due to further defence industry reorganisation, the NTW meanwhile became the responsibility of Denel, whose LIW division also hopes to sell its well-known 155mm G6 artillery systems to India.<br><br><strong>MCBROS JANUARY 2001 PHOENIX VISIT REPORT:</strong> when we visited McBros again in Phoenix after the 2001 SHOT Show we found the company had been extremely busy since Jan 2000 finalising its new Tubb 2000 target rifle, developed in co-operation with leading match shooter David Tubb, which was shortly to go on sale. This weapon (see previous issues), which is a bolt-action design inspired by the Knight’s Armament SR-25, and uses that rifle’s ten or 20-round magazines, is &#8211; as far as we can figure &#8211; the first really ‘high-tech’ target centrefire to emerge so far in the USA. It’s the kind of thing one’s more used to seeing from German .22 match rifle designers.<br><br>Whilst there are, we’re told, probably only about 200 serious top-league High-Power rifle competitors in the US, it’s expected that the biggest market for the Tubb 2000 will possibly be American gun enthusiasts who like the ‘techie’ look and advanced features.<br><br>However, law enforcement and the military will probably also be a fertile market; SOCOM (we assume Navy SEALs) already want several for testing, in a special configuration which includes the Knight Rail Interface System (RIS), shortened barrels (with maybe 1:14” twist) and muzzle suppressors, capable of being taken down (just remove the barrel) and carried in compact containers. The basic rifle is a 12-pound, pistol grip design with stainless receiver, tubular slotted handguard, free-floating 25” stainless Schneider match barrel, conventional turnbolt, Anschutz adjustable two-stage match trigger, pistol grip and skeletonised, fully-adjustable buttstock. A bipod can be attached to the handguard, and iron sights or scopes are mounted on a Picatinny rail. Barrels are readily removable using an action wrench, and customers can, if desired, simply buy a basic rifle plus alternative barrels in different calibres to obtain a complete family system.<br><br>Aluminium parts, which include not only the handguard but the magazine housing, trigger guard and buttstock assembly, can also be supplied anodized in a choice of colours: black, red, green, blue, turquoise, violet or bronze. Target shooters, especially the youngsters, tend to like this kind of thing. Personally, we can tolerate any colour on a firearm, provided it’s black. There’s even a cant indicator available for those who insist on tilting their weapons to shoot, and the sight mount itself can also be offset at five or ten degrees from the vertical, though when we learnt to handle our first .303”, back in the late 1950s, that would have earnt you a sharp cuss and an even sharper rap over the knuckles from the nearest NCO.<br><br>Likewise we’re leary of all those cute Estonian, Clodsockian or Slobbovian cocked-leg prone positions which are so popular nowadays. We guess we’re just backdated, which explains why we’ve never been remotely considered for the Olympic team!<br><br>Both competition and tactical versions of the Tubb 2000 are offered, the former with a single-round magazine cutoff to comply with NRA High-Power Rifle rules. A left-hander’s version is to follow. Recommended retail price (according to calibre) runs from $2,650 (.308 tactical version) to $2,950 (competition models). Spare barrels (complete with wrench) are $475.<br><br>Apart from .308, calibre options include .243, .260 Rem, 6mmX (a shortened .243) and 7mm-08; last year McBros also mentioned 6.5mm/.284, 7mm International and 6.5mm/.308.<br><br>There’s also interest in the Tubb rifle chambered for Winchester’s new .300 WSM short magnum cartridge, and McBros is now developing a version of the same weapon in .338 Lapua Magnum; this will require a new receiver and magazine. The US military had previously expressed interest in the relatively recent McBros bolt-action .338 Lapua Magnum weapons, but the basic military preference is still for detachable magazines, as provided on the Tubb rifle. Ammunition supply for the .338 is continuously improving; Black Hills is now making this calibre in the US, using 300gr Sierra Match bullets, and Federal is thought to be looking at offering its own .338 Lapua Mag loading in its Gold Medal line.<br><br>McBros also advised that Lapua itself is now offering four types of .338 &#8211; both tracer &amp; (we believe) blank, in addition to the ball &amp; AP loadings we tested in Finland some while ago.<br><br>Just like Robar, McBros has also seen demand for its .50 weapons increase substantially since Jan 2000, with production of .50 receivers more than doubled to around 500. And the company has sold a lot of .50 actions and barrels to the US navy for production of their own M88 rifles &#8211; the same US Navy-style .50 stock with detachable butt was also sold to UK special forces. However, this .50 workload, plus the Tubb developments, has meant that nothing more has yet been done with the interesting McBros .50/20mm Fat Mac system (Oops! Last year we see we called it the Big Mac!), based on a cut-down 20mm Vulcan cartridge necked down to .50.<br><br>The titanium rifle actions we saw earlier at McBros have not been very heavily promoted in the intervening year, but have nevertheless become a steady business.<br><br>7.62mm Minigun parts production for Dillon has also increased considerably in the past year, and if the rumoured DoD Minigun replacement programme were to proceed, this could be a very substantial bonus to both Dillon and McBros. We again spoke both to designer Ralf Dieckmann and Rock McMillan about the .50 semi-auto rifle Dieckmann has been developing for McBros over the past few years. At the time, some 75% of the production drawings had been completed, with the rest due by Spring this year, and it was hoped to build the production guns later in 2001.<br><br>The new trigger mechanism adopted last year has been successfully tested, and the prototype is said to shoot inside a minute at 1,000 yards, but it is still on the hefty side at 35 pounds; the target is to get this down to around 28 pounds. One lingering concern at McBros is a perceived need to find a muzzle brake design which will permit .50 SLAP ammunition to be fired without disruption of sabot separation at the muzzle. Clearly such a beast must exist, since SLAP has been used with other .50 rifles, though another possibility is that McBros could simply poach the buttstock buffering system it’s already used in the Tubb rifle, which features an elastomer cylinder in place of a buffer spring, and dispense with a muzzle brake altogether.<br><br>On the other hand, we hear very little about the military use of .50 SLAP; all the reports we’ve seen suggest that .50 MP is almost always preferred, because of the visual impact signature, absent when SLAP (which has only a small .30 calibre tungsten penetrator and no explosive charge) is fired. Pricewise, the goal for the .50 semi-automatic is around $5,000.<br><br>We should also mention that McBros is now located in an entirely new, modern facility north of Deer Valley Airport, on the extreme northern edge of Phoenix. A walk around the plant revealed (in addition to the EDM machines McBros uses to make its rifle receivers) virtually 100% CNC equipment. The quality of fit and finish obtainable with all this automated equipment is mighty impressive. We examined some barrels with what &#8211; at first glance &#8211; appeared to be integral multi-ported muzzle brakes, wondering how on earth they’d managed such a trick. However, despite absolutely no evidence of a join, the brakes actually turned out to be screwed on. The only other time we’ve ever seen fitting work like that was years ago on the old Mauser 66 assembly line in Oberndorf. http://www.mcmfamily.com, e-mail: mcbros@mcmfamily.com<br><br><strong>SHOULDER-STOCKED ‘SMITH &amp; WESSON’:</strong> Kettners in Germany are advertising a Smith &amp; Wesson CO2 ‘revolver rifle’ comprising a pellet-firing Model 586 revolver clone equipped with a shoulder-stock, which appears to have an adjustable buttpad and cheekpiece. We wonder if they also do this accessory for the real thing? Just the trick for those of us reluctantly shuffling beyond our Jesse James heyday.<br><br><strong>http://www.kettner.com/</strong><br><br><strong>IWA 2001 HEADS-UP:</strong> our sources on the floor at the IWA firearms expo in Nuremberg this year report that among the highlights were a clip-on shoulder stock for Glock pistols, new penetrator shotgun slugs from FIER in France, a Blaser-like Zastava straight-pull rifle, a TWM Smart Gun based on the Walther P99 pistol, a Kepplinger .338 Lapua Mag sniper rifle from Austria and a new semi-caseless ammunition concept from Voere, another Austrian exhibitor. The Glock shoulder stock reportedly hails from Wilhelm Bubits, who also developed a similar stock for Steyr’s new M-series pistols (which he designed), complete with internal compartments for two spare magazines in the butt. No tools are required for fitting. Our sources suggest the Glock 18 machine-pistol might logically be an early candidate for Bubits’ new stock, and we wholeheartedly agree! (Dan’s Note: Denny’s Guns is the US Distributor of this new Glock Stock. Contact at (816) 221-9117 ext 11)<br><br>Voere’s semi-caseless cartridges reportedly utilise a brass stub case and conventional primer for improved obturation, like the short cases seen on combustible 120mm tank gun charges.<br><br>However, we really don’t know why Voere is bothering, since semi-caseless systems permit none of the design advantages possible from dispensing with the case entirely, and they still require one to retain conventional feed and extraction mechanisms. There’s some saving in metal cost for the cartridge cases, but not a lot.<br><br>Voere’s earlier all-caseless .223 sporting rifles, though stylish, do not appear to have gone very far beyond the curiosity market, and we’re not convinced the future of a semi-caseless solution is any more rosy.<br><br>Remington’s pricey electronic sporters with their electrically-primed (but otherwise conventional) cartridges are about the biggest leap of faith the market might reasonably accept just now, and even this is still a major gamble. Unless new types of ammunition are available just about everywhere, they’re unlikely to catch on. Though Remington is now to supply electric primers for reloaders, the same reasoning applies, and anyway, not all hunters reload &#8211; and match shooters may not be allowed to.<br><br><strong>LARGE-CALIBRE RIFLE SPOTTED WITH MACEDONIAN FORCES:</strong> a photo run by the Financial Times on 23 Mar 01 showed two alleged members of the Macedonian ‘police special forces’ in Tetovo, one taking aim with a large-calibre scoped rifle of a type we can’t recall seeing before. It looks like a .50, but could equally be an east-bloc 12.7mm. Styling is modern, with a magazine of probably five rounds and a bipod suspended centrally from the top of the relatively short handguard. The muzzle brake is a flat, ‘hammerhead’ design. It’s almost certainly a bolt-action weapon, but the bolt handle was not visible due to the angle of the photograph. It’s reminiscent of the PGM Hecate II, but definitely isn’t that French rifle. Another photo in the same timescale showed ‘Macedonian’ troops in Fritz-style helmets, but since these were identical to those seen earlier on Serb troops (see other news) we suspect the captioning was incorrect. Furthermore, the helmets worn by the Macedonian police with the large-calibre rifle were quite different. Big rifles are popping up everywhere nowadays &#8211; the other night we spotted footage of Russian troops in WW2 (at Stalingrad, we recall) rapid-firing with a 14.5mm PTRS semi-auto rifle, which must have been quite an experience for the shooter, if not the recipient, undoubtedly qualifying his shoulder as a potential Hero of the Soviet Union.<br><br><strong>WORLD OF BERETTA AT THE NRA:</strong> if you want to see some classic guns from the 475-year history of Beretta, get on up to the NRA of America’s National Firearms Museum in Virginia, where 100 or so key weapons and other items from Beretta’s factory collection are now on display till the end of the year in a special new exhibit. There’s no admission charge. (National Rifle Association, 11250 Waples Mill Rd, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA, <a href="http://www.nra.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.nra.org/</a>)<br><br><strong>HODGDON 2001 RELOADING MANUAL IS ONLINE:</strong> save yourself the cost of a stamp and view Hodgdon Powder Co’s 2001 Basic Reloaders Manual on the Web at <a href="http://www.hodgdon.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.hodgdon.com/</a>. The 74-page manual (paper copies free on request) includes new data for the .338 Remington Ultra, .338-378 Weatherby, .450 Marlin, .376 Steyr (thank goodness!) plus reloading tables for Longshot and Titegroup powders.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N10 (July 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): June 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-june-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2001 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N9 (Jun 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N9]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br>F2000 ‘MODULAR’ RIFLE FROM FN HERSTAL: FN Herstal is touting a new modular rifle, the F2000, Armed Forces Journal International (AFJI) reported, which bears a close conceptual resemblance to the OICW, with some design features borrowed from the FN P-90 personal defence weapon. The rifle itself is a very stylish-looking, polymer-bodied 5.56mm bullpup with electronically-regulated rate of fire and an integral 1.6x optical sight in a detachable housing secured to a Picatinny rail which will also accept alternative sighting systems. And the weapon can also be integrated with a 40mm single-shot grenade-launcher; this requires the polymer handguard to be detached.<br><br>Grenades are fired using a large, weapon-mounted programmable fire control unit (aka ballistic computer) with laser rangefinder, the whole thing reportedly still in development at Noptel in Finland. Alternative bolt-ons include a three-shot grenade launcher (remember the SPIW?) an underbarrel shotgun for doorbusting or FN’s new XM303 non-lethal, compressed air ‘paintball gun’ (see previous issues).<br><br>Overall system and design integration is visually better than for the OICW. The cocking handle is on the left side, and emergency open sights are formed in the top of the scope housing. The ambidextrous fire-selector follows P-90 styling and the short slotted flash-hider is dished at about a 30-degree angle at the front, suggesting it also does double-duty as a compensator of sorts. There is also evidence of heat-dissipating microfluting on the section of barrel immediately behind the flash hider.<br><br>However, far &amp; away the most significant design breakthrough is the manner in which the F2000 handles ejection. We have been saying for years that the first bullpup to dispense with left/right ejection problems would, at a stroke, counter most of the common objections to compact rifles of this type &#8211; the obvious one being the impossibility of accurately-aimed fire for right-handed troops trying to shoot around right-hand cover. Global-defence.com explained that the F2000 ejects its fired cases forward of the weapon through a tube above the barrel; apparently this holds at least four empties and ejection therefore only starts once the tube is full. An unusual approach to the problem, admittedly, but one that also overcomes the main disadvantage of bottom ejection (the only other alternative), which is the risk of troops engaged in CQB operations slipping on fired cases falling around their feet when walking over hard surfaces such as tiled floors. And as all experienced users know, hot fired brass can be a real pain if cases drop down your sleeves or (worse) inside your Y-fronts.<br><br>The same source stated that the electronic rate controller was actually still under development; apparently the idea is to limit the cyclic rate to around 300-400rpm for most applications, but with the option of reverting to the weapon’s native rate of 850rpm when required.<br><br>Others, including Bushman’s George Ealovega and Gordon Ingram (of SMG fame) have developed their own electronic or hydraulic rate controllers in the past. And the basic idea’s not new &#8211; look for example at the hydraulic rate-damping plunger system on the Czech Skorpion machine-pistol, which delays the return of the bolt.<br><br>We have used Ealovega’s own hydraulic damper system in the M16A2 and found it of some help in keeping the weapon on target, though in well-braced short bursts of two or three rounds (all one ever usually needs to fire) the benefits are probably minimal. Due to the relatively high recoil &amp; jump factors with most 5.56mm weapons, this kind of device is considerably more useful on small 9mm SMGs&#8230;..like the Bushman, aka the 9mm IDW.<br><br>That said, retaining the option on the F2000 of reverting to 850rpm also answers those critics of rate-controlled systems (mostly, we find, from the US special forces) who argue that in CQB they need to be able to pump the maximum rounds possible into every target in the time allowed, so they don’t get back up again. This was not practical with most earlier systems, which required a different controller unit to be fitted in order to vary the rate.<br><br>We also wonder whether the low end of 300rpm on the F2000 is not maybe a little slow &#8211; historically many of the more efficient, older-style LMGs and SMGs have delivered optimum full-auto control somewhere around the 450rpm mark, the rate that was chosen (for example) for the H&amp;K 4.7mm G11, as opposed to its 2,200rpm+ rate for three-shot bursts.<br><br>Other existing or planned F2000 options include a bipod, bayonet interface, a laser aiming pointer, video camera, environmental sensors, an electronic compass, a target tracker, a thermal module, collimator sights, a flashlight and a laser training system.<br><br>FN reportedly sees itself as a contender for the US forces’ Modular Weapon System requirements, and though it is apparently not company policy to press the F2000 as an alternative to the OICW, the temptation to compare the two is still compelling.<br><br>Not least because of pricing &#8211; the F2000 is said to cost anything from $700 (basic configuration, without grenade-launcher) up to possibly $5,000 for the fully tricked-out system with 40mm launcher and electronic fire control. The extra cost of adding a five-round shotgun and XM303 to the basic rifle was given as $500 to $1,200.<br><br>Or weight, since the top-level configuration of the F2000 is claimed to weigh in at 13.6 pounds fully loaded, compared to the 14 pound target weight of the OICW (not nearly yet achieved). Bare F2000 rifle weight with scope is said to be eight pounds, or nine pounds with full 30-round magazine. Furthermore, without its grenade launcher, the F2000 still looks like a real assault rifle, unlike the OICW, which is technically also modular.<br><br>The whole caboodle (presumably including the cyclic rate/burstfire controller) is said to be powered by a nine-volt battery in the stock, but simple emergency ladder sights are provided on the F2000 in lieu of the grenade-launcher’s fire control unit, in case of the battery dying.<br><br>AFJI reported F2000 grenade accuracy during Belgian army tests of plus or minus two metres at 300m, which is uncommonly good. However, we imagine any three-shot launcher in 40mm for the F2000 will be a monster (that proposed for the SPIW certainly was), but FN is also reported to be planning, by about 2004, a new bolt-on launcher to fire the 20mm OICW HE ammunition.<br><br>Taking all these factors together, and even if FN doesn’t expect to displace the OICW itself, it would be logical to assume, as AFJI has done, that there might still be an opening amongst that majority of infantry troops which doesn’t really need (and never did) all the OICW’s new bells &amp; whistles.<br><br>The ‘Modular Weapon System’ (MWS) reference we believe to be a bit of a red herring, since the existing flat-top M16 rifles &amp; carbines with the additional new MWS mounting rails around the handguard are quite adequate for the purpose, and &#8211; for some years at least &#8211; it would be hard to justify superseding this expensive programme, which is still under way, in favour of an entirely new weapon.<br><br>Yet there could well be an F2000 market down the road for some or all of those army &amp; marine riflemen in the front-line infantry squads of (say) 2010 onwards who will not now be receiving the OICW, its high projected cost having essentially now relegated it to replacing only the M203-equipped rifles carried by grenadiers.<br><br>Leaving aside the US market, FN will undeniably open up many new doors with a front-ejecting design; armies which like the idea of a handy, compact rifle design but have so far held back on all bullpups because of the left/right ejection handicap may now want to take a closer look at this interesting new alternative.<br><br>After all, making left-handed troops fire from the right shoulder, as is done for SA80 in the UK forces, is plainly daft, and unlikely ever to get the best from the user. Nor do user-reversible ejection systems (as on the AUG) help with occasional shots round cover the inconvenient side of the firer. Of course, in these days of sharply-reduced defence budgets, none of this guarantees a huge market for the F2000 &#8211; timing is everything, and among most armies there is no longer the urgency to re-equip with the very latest kit which typified the Cold War era.<br><br>In many ways, it would have been much more to FN’s advantage if the F2000 had appeared a a decade or so ago, when several European countries might well have gone for it in preference to the Steyr AUG, the M16A2 or the Diemaco C7.<br><br>And if we were running the UK MOD, we’d certainly have flagged the F2000 as a possible SA80 replacement. Water under the bridge, unfortunately, but if FN’s new offering does all its claimed to do, it’s definitely going to take future business from its competitors. It might even help enliven the company’s P-90 and FiveSeven pistol sales along the way.<br><br>UK MOD SEEKS .50 LONG-RANGE EOD WEAPONS: the UK MOD seeks approx Qty 73 weapons in .50 calibre to be used by EOD personnel for long-range deflagration, in other words the remote destruction of unexploded ordnance, particularly large bombs, without provoking high-order detonation. The weapon, it would appear, must be able to be fired both directly and by remote control. It’s not been specifically stated that it will be a .50 rifle, but that’s the obvious conclusion, since these guns have been successfully used for some years with .50 Raufoss Multi-Purpose (MP) ammunition for destroying mines. Usually, .50 MP will blow the mine casing apart and scatter the contents without the mine’s HE charge exploding, though the remote scattering of live fuzes due to the use of this technique was a problem we recall emerged from Gulf operations; we’re not sure how this was overcome, if at all. Interested companies must contact the MOD by 31 Mar 01. This requirement, albeit differently worded, first appeared back in May 2000, but even if you replied to that trawl, you now need to reapply. UK contact: Tel (0117) 913-1415, Fax 1908, e-mail; Mob3c@dpa.mod.uk Sample weapons may have to be loaned to the UK MOD if it’s decided to hold competitive trials. Final tenders are due to be invited in the period Apr/May 2001.<br><br>BAN ON BALLISTIC VESTS PROPOSED FOR MARYLAND: ‘Police agencies from across the state threw their support yesterday behind a bill to restrict the sale and possession of body armor, a measure that faces equally strong opposition from members of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee&#8230;..Under the law, it would be illegal for most people to own body armor, or bullet-resistant vests, unless they obtained a permit.’ (Baltimore Sun, Maryland, 14 Mar 01)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N9 (June 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): May 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-may-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 00:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N8 (May 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N8]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br><strong>BARRETT FIREARMS</strong> expects more business from Israel, which seeks additional .50 M82A1 semi-auto rifles, but this time with all the latest enhancements (full-length Picatinny rails etc). Back in Sep 2000 we recall Barrett was shipping another 60 rifles with accessories to the UAE, another repeat customer who has bought substantial numbers of Barrett weapons in the past.<br><br><strong>RADWAY GREEN SECURES FRENCH 5.56MM CONTRACT</strong>: BAe Systems announced at the end of Jan 2001 that its Royal Ordnance Radway Green subsidiary had won a three-year, £5 million contract with the French defence procurement executive to supply 5.56mm NATO ammunition. It was apparently the first time France had gone to competitive tender for army ammunition, and since Radway Green is &#8211; historically &#8211; not best-known for its low prices this may possibly tell us something about GIAT Industries, the home team.<br><br>Hitherto the French army has used steel-cased 5.56mm ammunition from GIAT in its FAMAS bullpups, but Radway Green has no recent experience of this material in small calibres, so we assume it will be supplying the more conventional brass-cased cartridges instead. We asked them to comment on this aspect, but by press time had received no response.<br><br><strong>HIGH-VELOCITY TRANQUILISER DARTS</strong>: a new tranquilliser system called Eurodart, the Daily Telegraph reported, has been developed in the UK. It overcomes the wind drift, inaccuracy and excessive penetration problems of conventional tranquilliser darts, which are essentially hypodermic syringes with stabilising flights, typically fired at an MV of under 240 fps. The Eurodart has an MV in excess of 1,500 fps, making it more accurate to longer ranges, but it incorporates a grapefruit-sized, detonator-actuated ‘airbag’ membrane that inflates on impact, preventing excessive penetration and impact effects. Gas is used to propel the drug payload into the target. The paper suggested that Eurodart could also be used by security forces to deal with enemy troops or terrorists.<br><br><strong>SOCOM WILL ACQUIRE 40MM STRIKER</strong>: a little while back we reported that the General Dynamics (formerly Saco) 40mm Striker lightweight automatic grenade launcher was being evaluated by US Special Operations Command (SOCOM). Now a report in Armed Forces Journal International says a SOCOM buy of Strikers is indeed going ahead, for deployment in FY 2002, complete with its sophisticated Computing Devices fire control system from Canada, but with the expensive pre-programmable fuzed ammunition from Nammo not deployed until FY 2004.<br><br>Presumably special forces will make do with standard-issue US 40mm HV ammunition in the intervening two years. As far as we’re aware, the SOCOM purchase is the first Striker sale of any significance. Striker is probably way too pricey as a package to supplant the regular 40mm Mk19 launcher as a general army issue, but the close links between the various Western special forces organisations, many of which have their own separate procurement budgets, make it very likely that if one of them buys Striker, others may soon follow.<br><br><strong>WORLD’s OLDEST GUN REPORTED IN CHINA</strong>: a PTI report run by The Asian Age in mid-Jan 2001 said that, according to the Xinhua news agency, historians in China claim they’ve found the world’s oldest firearm with a collector in Heilongjiang province. It’s a copper blunderbuss dating from the Song dynasty (960-1279), 38cm long and weighing 5kg. It’s said to be 100 years older than the previously recorded ‘oldest’ firearm made in 1332, and is marked ‘Shen fei’, which translates from the Chinese as ‘flying magically’.<br><br><strong>UK DEVELOPING EMP SHELLS</strong>: a late Dec 2000 Daily Telegraph report said that the UK was developing electro-magnetic pulse (aka radio frequency or RF) weapons packaged as 155mm shells or artillery rockets, intended to disable electronics rather than human targets. It said the impetus for the British programme was a technical paper, delivered at a French conference in 1994, which revealed Russian EMP research dating from as far back as the 1940s&#8230;.plus the revelation in 1998 that Russia already had such a weapon, and handily briefcase-sized at that. Furthermore the IRA was alleged to have considered using EMP to disrupt the City of London’s financial centre rather than blowing it up (again). Apparently the British R&amp;D on EMP weapons is being done by Matra BAe Dynamics, who are said to have convinced the MOD that a viable weapon can be produced.<br><br><em>The newspaper described the modus operandi, in part, as follows</em>:<br><br>‘The shell or rocket will follow the normal trajectory of a standard missile but contain only a few grammes of explosive used to open it up as it approaches the target. An array of aerials then spring out and a burst of radio frequency of less than a second’s duration is transmitted, disabling all electronic equipment within a given range.’<br><br>It’s no secret that, conceptually, weapons of this type are becoming much more attractive than conventional munitions for tackling situations such as the occupation of Kosovo, and we already know that non-lethal guided weapons were used in Desert Storm and the former Yugoslavia to short-circuit power lines and electricity distribution equipment’. Lowering the prospect of casualties (on either side) reduces the threshold of political and public resistance to the initial idea of intervention, and avoiding gratuitous deaths during the ensuing military operations limits the likelihood of valid international censure. That said, we doubt EMP weapons are all that difficult to produce, and the crunch will inevitably come when it’s discovered at the 11th hour that a potential adversary is similarly equipped.<br><br>With the very high military dependency on electronics nowadays, you’d need to be very sure all your own vital equipment was adequately protected against offensive electromagnetic interference, or the resultant chaos could prove to be mutual. Of course, once you start thinking in terms of attacking electronic infrastructure instead of people, it’s logical to continue down this same ideological road into the realms of infowar, with hacking and viral disruption of crucial enemy computer networks. In fact, if you can adequately refine your infowar techniques, EMP weapons may not in fact be necessary at all.<br><br><strong>US ARMY RUNNING OUT OF 9MM AMMUNITION?</strong>: according to a Washington Times report in early Feb 2001, the US army is suffering from a worldwide shortage of 9mm NATO ammunition, which is restricting training with the M9 pistol. The paper apparently got hold of an army memo cancelling pistol training for anyone other than MPs and those troops about to be posted abroad. It added that no other units, including reserves and National Guard, would get any more 9mm ammunition until Autumn this year. A Pentagon source the paper tackled said that the problem was financial; interestingly the Times noted another report from an overseas US unit claiming similar shortages existed in 5.56mm. Reportedly there is a $242m shortfall in the ammunition budget.<br><br>At the risk of repeating ourselves, if anyone in the DoD or Congress (which presumably imposed the cuts that got the army into this sorry state in the first place) thinks that this kind of thing can be countered by the increased use of simulation equipment, forget it. There’s no substitute for live-fire, and given the huge size of the US defence budget it’s simply ludicrous to be skimping on low-priced basic necessities such as ammo.<br><br><strong>UK SMALL ARMS DESTRUCTION</strong>: in response to a Parliamentary Question, the UK MOD stated on 5 Feb 2001 that:<br><br>‘In conformity with UN resolution 54/54R the United Kingdom has reported that the total number of surplus small arms it destroyed in 1999 was 31,939. The majority of these were armed forces weapons (some 28,000) with the balance from the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Metropolitan police. Comparable statistics for 2000 are not yet available. Our current policy on the disposal of small arms declared surplus by the Ministry of Defence is to restrict transfers to those which meet the legitimate defence and security needs of overseas Governments.’<br><br><strong>‘SWORDS’ TO PLOUGHSHARES &#8211; LITERALLY</strong>: from comments in the Conflict, Security &amp; Development Group Bulletin we note that, in Liberia, 19,000+ small arms, 600 heavy weapons and 2m+ rounds of ammunition were destroyed in Jul 99, with the scrap being converted, with German assistance into ‘agricultural implements’. Further weapon destruction was also anticipated in Mali at the end of 2000.<br><br><strong>MALAYSIA LANDMINE DESTRUCTION</strong>: a Reuters report picked up by The Asian Age said that Malaysia was to destroy 94,000 mines on 23 Jan 2001 as part of its commitment to the Ottawa Convention banning the use of anti-personnel landmines which are activated by their victims. Malaysia’s entire stock is reportedly being disposed of.<br><br><strong>EUROPEAN SURPLUS WEAPONS DESTRUCTION</strong>: according to JDW, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Holland, Sweden &amp; the UK have reported to the UN the collective destruction, over the period 1990-2000, of 3.5million+ surplus small arms, in accordance with the requirements of a 2000 United Nations resolution. In the UK’s case, we don’t imagine this leaves the MOD exactly short of weapons, since there are still vastly more SA80s than the armed forces could ever use, and we noted that enough 7.62mm L1A1 rifles were easily found last year to equip those ‘strictly over-18’ local troops in Sierra Leone.<br><br>However, with increased Western sensitivity to casualties, the changing nature of the military threat and the likelihood that ways will almost certainly be found in future to avoid another general mobilisation of ground forces, the holding of large surpluses of small arms must now be increasingly difficult to justify.<br><br><strong>CALIFORNIAN ASSAULT RIFLE BAN &#8211; SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO RULE</strong>: ‘The U.S. Supreme Court passed up a challenge to California’s pioneering assault weapons ban, opting Tuesday not to decide if the state is applying the law unconstitutionally. The court, without comment, let stand a lower court decision that upheld the state’s ability to selectively add weapons to the list of banned models while allowing the sale of nearly identical guns.’ (AP, Washington DC, via CNN, 20 Feb 01)<br><br><strong>WACO PROSECUTOR FESSES UP</strong>: ‘Former prosecutor Bill Johnston says he will plead guilty to obstructing an investigation into the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound near Waco. In return, prosecutors will recommend probation, the Waco Tribune-Herald reported Tuesday&#8230;.Johnson has admitted withholding information dealing with the FBI’s use of pyrotechnic gas&#8230;.’ (AP, Waco (Texas), 6 Feb 01)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N8 (May 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): April 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-april-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N7 (Apr 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N7]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br><strong>PUNGENT THOUGHTS ON THE M40A3:</strong> writing in the US Marine Corps Gazette, former USMC Lt Col Norm Chandler and his ex-US army Master Sgt brother Roy recently argued strongly against the Marine Corps adopting its proposed M40A3 rifle design for sniping. In particular they criticised the planned M40A3 stock (designed by the Corps), a bulky item which it would appear has been poached directly from the match shooting world, plus the non-tapered M40A3 trigger guard and its thumb-operated floorplate release for the magazine.<br><br>They considered all the existing M40A1 stock actually lacks is an adjustable cheekpiece, and said that McMillan could easily modify this item to meet their recommendation. We must confess the modern trend to fit over-specified target-style stocks on military sniping rifles is a practice we also abhor. Look for example at the British L96A1 with all those unnecessary square edges, the accessory rail &amp; suchlike. The proposed scope mount also attracted the Chandlers’ attention, because of the relatively low temperature used for brazing it to the scope rings or rail, likely to prove inadequate to the task. And they furthermore considered that larger, more robust bolts should be used for fastening the scope mount to the rifle itself.<br><br>As to the 10x Unertl scope, the Chandlers described this as ‘stunningly obsolete’, too powerful for general use, too heavy, lacking waterproofing and with inadequate eye relief. Instead they recommended a 2-3.5&#215;10 variable-power scope, which would give a much larger close-range field of view at lower magnifications while retaining the higher magnification for use at extended ranges.<br><br>Also criticised was the Corps’ choice of a selected M14 as its sniper support weapon, issued to the No 2 man in the Scout/Sniper team, because of its weight, 20-shot magazine, high maintenance requirement and the difficulty of satisfactorily accurising this elderly weapon. The Chandlers considered a softer-recoiling, higher-capacity weapon (eg the M16, as was issued before, though with flat top (‘M16A3’) receiver and the full-auto switch restored) would be more suitable, fitted with a 3-4x ACOG scope from Trijicon, but they also allowed the possibility of an M4 carbine, even (only in America!) a 100-round C-Mag.<br><br><strong>DU DEFINED</strong>: when reports go on at great length about depleted uranium (DU) issues, are we always sure exactly what is meant? Helpfully, the term was recently defined by a nuclear boffin writing in Military Technology magazine. He explained that natural uranium is treated in nuclear enrichment plants to extract the tiny amount (just 0.72%) of the isotope Uranium 235, which is used in the nuclear industry, after which the remainder of the material, constituting almost pure Uranium 238, is discarded. This is depleted uranium. The extracted U-235, not surprisingly, is called enriched uranium, and is much in demand, both from the nuclear good guys and the not-so-good.<br><br><strong>BUMBLE BEE &#8211; MORE BANG THAN SHMEL</strong>: in our Dec 2000 issue we noted the following:-<br><br><strong>‘MAFIA’s BALKAN WEAPON BUSINESS</strong>: ‘One of the most alarming developments is the range of weapons being shipped through the Balkans to a client list that includes ETA and the Real IRA. The detonators for the Omagh bomb originated in Croatia and the RP-7 rocket fired at MI6 headquarters in London was made in Yugoslavia and almost certainly bought from the Kosovo Mafia. Recently the Italian Carabinieri in Kosovo traced supplies of a Russian weapon known as “Bumblebee”, which fires a form of napalm round from a bazooka tube.’ (Daily Telegraph, London, 15 Dec 00, on Sicilian Mafia-organised activities in the Balkans)<br><br>We have since been provided with more information on the device known as Bumblebee, which is actually its old NATO codename. The Russian designation for this weapon, which is redolent of the American M72 LAWS, is the RPO-A Shmel Flame Thrower / Thermobaric System, an expendable recoilless weapon.<br><br>It is a fuel-air blastwave device designed to produce severe overpressure, which can reach 7kg per square centimetre in small confined spaces, and will ‘flow’ through trench &amp; shelter systems; it also devours all oxygen in the detonation zone and produces non-survivable temperatures in excess of 800 degrees Celsius. In the open air, at a range of five metres from detonation, overpressure is in the region 0.4 to 0.8 kg per square centimetre.<br><br>The RPO-A has a calibre of 93mm, is 92cm long and weighs 12 kg. Minimum and maximum ranges are 25 and 1,000 metres respectively, but the weapon is sighted to 600 metres. Its thermobaric payload is just 1.2kg.<br><br>Someone who actually fired one of these devices in Africa reported that the effects were akin to a mini nuclear explosion. Similar fuel-air rounds are already available for the RPG-7 and (JDW noted) have also been developed for the Russian 220mm TOS-1 rocket system (in that case ranging to 3,500 metres), as well as Russia’s Kornet &amp; Metis-M anti-armour missiles.<br><br>Definitely not something to be on the receiving end of if you ever plan to play the violin again.<br><br><strong>40MM SPONGE GRENADE &#8211; NEW OPTIONS</strong>: the original 40mm Sponge Grenade &#8211; a rather misleadingly-named inert projectile with deformable sponge rubber head for the M203, M79 and similar 40mm launchers, was developed by Picatinny Arsenal as part of the US DoD’s non-lethal weapons programme, and at least one early batch of these 40mm cartridges was manufactured by Knight’s Armament Co in Florida.<br><br>More recently we note that Combined Tactical Systems Inc in Jamestown (Pennsylvania) is offering a much wider range of Sponge Cartridge options, not just the basic inert version (Prod No 4557) but also new variants additionally loaded with CN (Prod No 4520), CS (Prod No 4530) or OC pepper (Prod No 4540). All the irritant payloads are in powder form. The Sponge Grenade utilises the standard high-low pressure system of the 40mm low-velocity grenade cartridge and is meant for use in rifled barrels which will impart the necessary stability. Compression of the spongy head during impact serves to squeeze out the irritant contents.<br><br>One concern we had about the original Sponge Grenade was the possibility that the head might compress right back to the hard plastic shoulder beneath; we do not now if the design has since been modified, but potential users would be well-advised to explore this aspect.Combined Tactical Systems warn on their website that the Sponge Cartridge should not be used at short range, but no recommended engagement envelope is specified. This is another aspect potential users should investigate before making a purchase decision.<br><br>The same company offers a wide range of other less-than-lethal anti-riot munitions, as well as pyrotechnics and launchers. http://www.less-lethal.com/<br><br><strong>NOTTINGHAM DISPOSING OF ITS SMALL ARMS MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT</strong>: another milestone in the dissolution of British small arms manufacturing appears imminent, as H&amp;K (UK) (Royal Ordnance Nottingham) is reportedly preparing to transfer the majority of its barrel-hammering presses to H&amp;K headquarters in Oberndorf. It has three of these GFM presses, we’re told, which probably cost about £1m apiece when new, and two are apparently going to Germany, where we’re sure they can make good use of them. Other Nottingham manufacturing equipment is also said to be up for disposal; possibly it may all go to auction.<br><br>What a pity that the UK MOD &amp; BAe Systems, which could so easily have directed that all or most of the latest SA80 upgrade work be done in Britain, have seen fit instead to allow Nottingham’s small arms line to simply wither &amp; die. First the RSAF at Enfield closed, and work was transferred to Nottingham, where SA80 was completed &#8211; then, only a few years later, it’s goodbye Nottingham. Ah, you might well say, but along the way Royal Ordnance bought Heckler &amp; Koch, so that must surely be progress?<br><br>Well, it would be, if Royal Ordnance was not trying to sell H&amp;K too. Were there some competition in this field, it would not be so bad, but Parker-Hale is reportedly now on the rocks too, leaving Accuracy International &#8211; itself not a major operation &#8211; as the last active military gunmaker in Britain.<br><br>BSA &amp; Webley (now apparently the recipient of the Parker-Hale cleaning kit business) long ago quit the cartridge weapons market, though we did hear a while back that BSA CF2 rifles could possibly still be obtained to special order. But maybe we should not be terribly surprised &#8211; apparently only a measly one in five of the British workforce is now engaged in manufacturing of any sort. And as far as BAe itself is concerned, we get the impression that if it doesn’t have wings on, it’s not terribly interested.<br><br>Britain is steadily becoming a nation of service industries, though the pitfalls of this are clear &#8211; in times of economic downturn, it’s services that are the first to suffer cutbacks. An economy increasingly based on ‘dot.com’ speculation and funny money is not exactly rock-solid.<br><br><strong>UK MOD BUYS MORE HI-POWERS</strong>: The UK MOD has recently ordered from FN Herstal Qty 2000 9mm L9A1 pistols (Browning Hi-Powers), plus 4,000 magazines and 2,000 cleaning rods. No price was released. We assume this is a normal maintenance buy. The rumour’s been going around that the MOD might be planning to ditch its Hi-Powers altogether in favour (like the UK special forces) of SIG pistols, but this buy certainly suggests otherwise.<br><br><strong>FN LESS-LETHAL PAINTBALL GUN</strong>: JDW reported in Jan 2001 that FN Herstal had developed a less-than-lethal paintball gun, powered by compressed air, firing 12-gauge projectiles weighing eight grams apiece. The ammunition range is said to provide impact, marker, illuminating and ‘malodorant’ (nasty niff) capability, with a range of 100 metres. A special fin-stabilised rubber baton round is also available. The US army is reportedly testing the system as the XM303, which can be provided as a 2.3kg discrete launcher with integral buttstock or a 2.2kg underbarrel M203-style attachment for the M16-series rifle.<br><br>Magazine capacity is 15 shots and the MV 300 fps. Judging from the illustration, the weapon is made largely from plastics. Apparently the US requirement for devices of this type is 70% hit probability on a man-sized target at 100 metres, which the XM303 reportedly exceeds. FNMI reports interest not only from the military but also law enforcement organisations.In our experience, 100 metres is at the outer edge of range capability for most baton guns (and rarely needed, since it’s beyond normal stone-throwing range). It’s quite possible with (say) the 37mm ARWEN, but definitely not in a strong crosswind. Smaller projectiles such as those fired by the XM303 may well fare better by dint of providing less wind resistance.<br><br><strong>MERCENARY REGULATION DEFERRED</strong>: a Financial Times report at end-Nov 2000 said that UK Foreign Office plans to introduce new legislation regulating private military services companies were likely to be deferred until after the Spring 2001 general election in favour of promoting new arms export controls.Under the FO measures, already substantially drafted, mercenary providers could either be subjected to self-regulation, registration or have to secure UK government approval for each mission they wanted to embark upon (the current US and South African procedure), ruling out help to anyone other than recognised foreign governments.<br><br>It’s all part of the FO’s much-derided ‘ethical foreign policy’ initiative that still refuses to lie down. Of course, it also entirely misses the point. Mercenary forces are often most needed when a minority movement somewhere wants to overthrow an oppressive, unjust or plain illegitimate regime which just happens, at the time, to be the only ‘official’ government thereabouts. Confining mercenary support only to recognised governments, regardless of how morally bankrupt (if not positively genocidal) they might be (and many are), would be robbing liberation movements around the world of vital assistance they need in order to try to create the kind of democratic societies which the US and the UK (to name but two) claim to support as a political ideal.<br><br>Fixing elections, knocking off awkward customers and rearranging governments was a policy the CIA enthusiastically pursued throughout Latin America for many years. It also bolstered the Afghans against Russia (sowing the seeds of Osama bin Laden’s buddies, the fundamentalist Taliban movement) and still quietly involves itself in this kind of thing in the Middle East, supporting insurgents in Iran and Iraq, for example.<br><br>With all this hypocrisy surrounding the subject, small wonder then that so much mercenary activity is forced underground or headquartered in obscure countries. It’s mighty ironic too, since private military companies are ideally placed to perform a wide range of overseas tasks that Western governments nowadays find distasteful or politically sticky, handy casualty-avoidance being just one factor. The Sierra Leone mission, for instance, is one where regular British forces simply don’t belong.<br><br>The Blair administration could stop playing power politics with the British forces and bring the guys home tomorrow if Sierra Leone solely used mercenaries (which the UK could covertly fund), enabling the government there to stop pussyfooting around, winnow down as many of the RUF wild men as ammunition stocks permit and bring the problem to a speedy conclusion.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N7 (April 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): March 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-march-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2001 00:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N6 (Mar 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N6]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br><strong>METAL STORM IN UAV GUN DEAL</strong>: a Flight International report said that Australia’s Metal Storm company, which has developed a variety of concepts based on single &amp; multi-barrel ‘roman candle’ guns, with multiple rounds stacked base to point down the length of each barrel, had secured ‘low-level’ funding of $350,000 from the US DoD’s DARPA research agency to conduct a feasibility study on a new high-rate gun for unmanned air vehicles (UAV). Metal Storm already has a $10.5m grant from DARPA to develop an electronic, multi-barrel sniper rifle, which sounds to us like an entirely inappropriate technology for a weapon of this type, though we were pleased to read that Metal Storm is still pursuing its ideas for last-ditch CIWS salvo systems for protecting ships and vehicles against missile attack &#8211; which we still consider to be the most promising area of development for the company.<br><br>Reportedly the UAV gun study will also address the use of teargas and smoke ammunition from this type of platform. The article said Metal Storm was already working on a 40mm grenade-firing ground-attack pod to be mounted on fighter aircraft or UAVs. It’s safe to deduce from all this that the reported DoD interest in taking human pilots out of US warplanes is far more than a rumour, though we still worry about all remotely-operated weapons, since poorly-judged button jabbing is far more likely when the enemy &#8211; and his uninvolved civilians &#8211; are not staring you in the face. The intended rate for the UAV gun, by the way, is reportedly ‘tens of millions’ of rounds a minute, though we must emphasise that such a high cyclic rate does not deliver anything like this many projectiles to the target, since it’s impossible to carry sufficient ammunition to sustain such rates for more than a few seconds.<br><br>Footnote: things may, in fact, not be quite as simple as they seem, since Flight International noted in mid-Nov 2000 that the US Air Force had suspended flight trials of an armed variant of its RQ-1A Predator UAV from General Atomics because the Pentagon was still trying to figure out whether trials &amp; deployment of armed UAVs contravened the 1988 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty. This agreement was apparently aimed primarily at restricting the deployment of cruise missiles in the 500-5,000km range bracket, but it’s an issue which, if unresolved, could also crimp US plans to field unmanned warplanes. However, we imagine the notoriously creative legal eagles at the Pentagon will soon find a way to weasel round this. Separately, The Economist noted that the DoD was also poised to test operator software for the Boeing X-45A, a genuine unmanned combat aircraft or UCAV, eight metres long with a ten metre wingspan and twin weapon racks. It’s scheduled for flight testing in Spring 2001, though we must assume this is, for the moment, subject to resolution of the same legal glitches affecting the armed UAV trials.<br><br><strong>INERTIALLY-STABILISED SMALL ARMS?</strong>: the US army has been experimenting with inertially-stabilised reticles for sniping, a ploy intended to take aiming errors out of the equation, particularly when engaging difficult, unknown-distance, moving or fleeting targets, but when we last heard about this project the equipment required was still far too bulky; a Mormon hand cart would have been handy. Maybe this is the reason why, according to National Defense, the Army Research Laboratory (ARL) is now playing with stabilised small arms mounts for light vehicles, aimed at allowing troops to accurately engage targets on the move without ever having to stop or leave the protection of the vehicle.<br><br>The idea has reportedly been tried on a Hummer (with a .50 M2 HB) and on a lightweight fast attack vehicle (FAV). Stationary FAV results with an M16A2 rifle were claimed to be equivalent to prone firing, but while driving at only 10 mph initial results against stationary targets at 400 metres were about three times worse. However, after extra bearings &amp; springs were incorporated into the firing platform, results evidently improved dramatically, with ten-shot group sizes claimed to be only 43 to 48cm, over a combination of scenarios with the vehicle and/or target moving, and firing from a variety of angles to the target.<br><br>The inertial reticle package itself is said to comprise a laser rangefinder plus a video camera and display unit in the vehicle linked to a ‘positioner’ for the weapon which controls its movement by sensing its relationship with the position of the vehicle, taking into account factors such as pitch &amp; roll. After lasing the target to obtain a range reading, the firer observes the sight picture and the reticle image displayed on a unit resting on his lap. With sensors automatically correcting the equation for range &amp; elevation, according to target distance and weapon/target movement, the display unit indicates an aim point and the firer steers the reticle to it using a joystick. The trigger is then pulled, but the weapon is fired electronically only at the optimum moment necessary to strike the target.<br><br>Though one can see some advantages if the underlying rationale is never to expose troops to harm by making them dismount to accurately engage ground targets, we still can’t discount the need to leave the vehicle in certain circumstances. For example, when coming under effective fire in an un-armoured troop carrier it may be necessary to urgently seek cover. It may also be impossible to spot all enemy targets that might present themselves while the firer is closeted away inside a vehicle, possibly with a limited field of view. And to reliably clear enemy personnel troops from dugouts, buildings or strongpoints, troops would again have to dismount and take their chances. There’s no infantry technology yet designed that can guarantee eternal life.<br><br>Furthermore, if (as we suspect) the army actually has future armoured troop carriers like the Bradley’s successor more in mind, why bother too much about effective rifle or LMG fire when one can simply rake targets from afar with the onboard 25mm cannon? And what is ‘effective’ fire, after all? Essentially it’s fire that denies movement to the enemy, forcing his troops to keep their heads down while you move; it’s desirable but not strictly necessary to hit anything, just as long as rounds are falling close enough to constitute a perceived threat.<br><br>Pondering all the sighting &amp; aiming technology involved here &#8211; and it’s certainly imaginative enough &#8211; we can’t help thinking it’s also still wildly over-complicated and a lot of bother for no truly pressing reason. It is virtually always going to be more important to be able to lay down an immediate high volume of fire, albeit imperfectly aimed, than to lose valuable seconds going for a series of precision shots. After all, speed is usually of the essence in order to dominate or win any firefight. We feel that if it has a practical application, the inertial reticle technology is probably best reserved for heavier, crew-served, low-rate and characteristically less accurate weapons &#8211; the 40mm automatic grenade launcher being the obvious example &#8211; firing high-cost ammunition. Bearing in mind the long flight time of 40mm grenades (17 seconds at maximum range), one could (say) fire an initial reactive burst or two without inertial assistance, then establish a more accurate aim point using the inertial equipment while waiting for the first rounds to reach the target.<br><br><strong>SULLIVAN BREAKS WITH ARMFORTE</strong>: we have recently been notified that Arizona designer Jim Sullivan, sole inventor of the Counterpoise kit for the M16 rifle series, no longer has any connection with ArmForte Inc, in which he was formerly a partner with Mack Gwinn (of MWG). Products affected (in addition to Counterpoise) include Sullivan’s D-ring extractor spring system, regulated gas tubes, long-stroke bolt carrier assemblies, twin bolt piston rings, and quick-change barrel assemblies for M16-series weapons, plus his micro-fluted heat-dissipating barrels and proposed base sabot projectile (see previous issues).We assume Sullivan now plans to market all these products himself through S-Tec, his own firm, e-mail: sstec@northlink.com.<br><br><strong>.458x39MM COVERT RIFLE</strong>: the Chandler brothers who run Iron Brigade Armory in North Carolina wrote in ‘The Accurate Rifle’ that they have developed a custom, short-range covert sniper rifle in .458x39mm calibre with a novel tubular barrel tensioner. Apparently the new subsonic round, loaded with a 500gr solid bullet, is another variation on the .458 x 2” (aka .458 American) used (for example) by Arms Tech of Phoenix in its own suppressed weapons, and makes neat holes in glass without undue splintering. It’s expected to produce one-hole groups out to 150 yards. The rifle is based on a Remington M700 action, titanium-bedded, with a McMillan hunter stock converted to take-down configuration by a joint in the stock just behind the pistol grip, so it will now fit inside a 30” gun case. Length of the Douglas barrel is 18” and the rifling 1 in 20”. Iron Brigade does not make suppressors itself, and has not tested the system when silenced, but the idea is that the barrel could be drilled and rings placed along the barrel inside the sleeve would serve to baffle &amp; decelerate the gases. The remaining voids could be filled with absorbent material such as bronze wool, and in effect you would then have a wraparound suppressor.<br><br><strong>SOCOM’s 5.56MM Mk46 MACHINE GUN</strong>: a JDW report noted that, having tested a variety of candidates, the US Special Operations Command (SOCOM) is to adopt a Special Purpose Weapon (SPW) variant of the 5.56mm M249 squad automatic, otherwise known as the FN Minimi. The decision was actually made back in June. The SPW will be known in service as the Mk46, and &#8211; though JDW is silent on this point &#8211; since this is a US Navy designation it’s fair to assume the primary recipients will be the SEAL teams. A potential 2,506 weapons are reportedly required, over four years, though the initial order is only for about 400 guns.<br><br>New features include a 15” fluted barrel and a monobloc gas regulator, eliminating easily-lost parts, which can be cleaned externally. Bolt and bolt carriers are also plated with electroless nickel to allow the SPW to fire up to 1,000 rounds without lubrication. The M249 feed box has gone, but the SPW incorporates the feed cover mounting rail for optical sights recently adopted as a late M249 modification, and the buttstock is non-adjustable. We saw no mention of a bipod. There are also four Modular Weapon System accessory-mounting rails around the front of the receiver, and the bottom rail is provided with a forward vertical handgrip &#8211; this option is nowadays quite popular for the M4 too.<br><br>Six SPWs were reportedly delivered for ‘first article’ testing (to include salt-spray tests &#8211; read SEALs again!) at the end of Sep 2000, and each apparently fired 50,000 rounds. Series production is scheduled for Feb 2001. The SPW shown was fitted with one of the 100-round Picatinny Arsenal soft ammunition packs, basically resembling a zip-up camo washbag with rigid top, into which a 100-round belt is placed from beneath. Gun weight is listed as 5.72kg, which is a 1.8kg saving on the M249, and length overall is 90.8cm.<br><br>Coupled with the stubby barrel, 750 rpm rate of fire and the unlubricated 1,000-rd endurance requirement, we guess that &#8211; in practice &#8211; the SPW will be used primarily as a ‘machine rifle’, with greater tolerance for abuse than (whatever anyone tries) the M4 carbine can provide. It plainly doesn’t meet the calibre or range criteria for a textbook LMG or GPMG; for these the trend is now switching back to 7.62mm NATO. Furthermore, having tried both, this author still feels the basic operating mechanism of the 5.56mm Ares/Stoner LMG with the very long recoil stroke offers much greater firing stability and control than that of the Minimi.<br><br><strong>FAVOURITE BIN LADEN GEAR</strong>: a 1998 AP photo recently run by the Financial Times showed top Washington bogeyman Osama bin Laden chatting to reporters in Afghanistan. It appears from this image that his personal weapon of choice is the stubby little 5.45mm AKS-74U. One of these rifle-calibre ‘subguns’ was against the wall of the tent right behind him, resting on the cushions, fitted with one of those maximum-capacity 45-round RPK-74 LMG magazines. So be warned; the man is clearly ready for anything&#8230;&#8230;not just awkward press questions. And just to annoy the hell out of the Feds, he doesn’t look much like his picture on the FBI’s famous wanted poster either. Despite all Washington’s attempts at demonising the man, he appears positively beatific. Nutty as a fruitcake, quite possibly (we’ve read some of his strange idealogical observations), and definitely not the world’s greatest fan of the US, but never underestimate the opposition; nowadays they have spin-doctors too.<br><br><strong>ITALIANS DEVELOP ENGINE-STOPPER GUN</strong>: TTU International reported in Nov 2000 that CISAM (Centro Interforze di Studi per le Applicazione Militari) in Italy had developed &amp; tested an electromagnetic ‘ray gun’ which could be used to stop injection engines. TTU speculated that one target could be speedboats used by smugglers to get to Italy from Albania and Montenegro.<br><br><strong>BRITS GIVE SWAZIS WEAPON DESTRUCTION KIT</strong>: MRB noted in Oct 2000 that the British High Commissioner in Swaziland had presented so-called Euro-shear equipment to the police chief over there for use in the destruction of confiscated weapons and other ‘proceeds of crime’. The equipment is valued at more than Euros 60,000. Up till now the Swazis have relied on the South African police to do this job for them, but it’s hoped that destroying the weapons in situ will prevent any ‘leakage’.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N6 (March 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Arms Data by Wire (SADW): February 2001</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/small-arms-data-by-wire-sadw-february-2001/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2001 21:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N5 (Feb 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMI Launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mouse-Ball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Steadman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SA80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SADW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small arms data by wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSK Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N5]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Nick Steadman SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Nick Steadman</strong><br><br><em>SADW is a monthly electronic publication from Nick Steadman Features. Nick, intrepid world traveling reporter for much of the arms industry, files this 40,000 to 50,000 word report once a month to his loyal subscribers. Those lucky ones pay a mere $50 (US) £32.50 (UK) per year for the privilege of getting the hot tips and insights from one of the industry’s insiders. Nick’s unique perspective is globally based, as is his wit. Each issue is full of insight and information for those with an interest in Small Arms, as well as his observations on world travel.</em><br><br><strong>SA80 UPGRADE TO BE DONE IN GERMANY, PERIOD</strong>: a Financial Mail on Sunday report in early Nov 2000 confirmed that, despite an MOD-requested review by BAe Systems of the decision to place the 5.56mm SA80 upgrade contract with Heckler &amp; Koch in Oberndorf, as opposed to the Royal Ordnance/H&amp;K (UK) small arms facility at Nottingham, there would be no change in the arrangements already agreed The award of this £83m deal to Oberndorf leaves little prospect of Nottingham being saved &#8211; in fact BAe has already announced it is scheduled to close by the end of 2001. However, staff unions have suggested the reason behind the choice of Oberndorf &#8211; which BAe wants to sell, together with all the rest of its small arms activities &#8211; was to make it a more juicy prospect for potential buyers. Some 200,000 SA80 weapons are planned to be upgraded.<br><br><strong>MOUSE-BALL AMMUNITION LAUNCHERS</strong>: two types of IMI launcher appear to be in common use among Israeli forces for firing the controversial rubber-coated steel ball (aka mouse ball) ammunition used for riot control over there. One is a large diameter canister placed on the muzzle, dispensing a multiple-ball payload, the other (which is more often seen) is a narrow-diameter tube which (if TV footage is any guide) appears to be loaded manually with one ball at a time, with a blank used for launching. The version the US forces want to procure as part of their new ‘non-lethal’ armoury is the multi-ball canister device, somewhat ironic since &#8211; in the lethality stakes &#8211; multiple projectiles are always dicier, as there’s little control over their dispersion once they leave the launcher.<br><br><strong>NZ TROOPS COMPLAIN ABOUT AUG QUIRKS</strong>: a report from the New Zealand Press Association in early Oct 2000 said that several of the 5.56mm AUG rifles (which are made in Australia) carried by New Zealand troops in East Timor had ‘jammed’ during a fatal ambush over there. Apparently the rifles failed to recycle and had to be manually recocked after the attached M203 grenade launchers were fired. This fault is allegedly known to the NZ army, according to troops calling themselves ‘Concerned Soldiers of East Timor’. They’re also said to dislike the M203 fit on the AUG, claiming it’s too cumbersome, though frankly this also applies to the 40mm launcher when installed on conventionally-configured rifles, making them extremely muzzle-heavy, which is why we favour a dedicated multi-shot launcher rather than a dual-purpose weapon. Technically-speaking, on an AUG the M203 actually ought to help counteract the typical butt-heavy characteristics of all 5.56mm bullpups.<br><br><strong>50 PEACEKEEPER CARTRIDGE FROM SSK INDUSTRIES</strong>: the irrepressible JD Jones (‘JD’), proprietor of SSK Industries in Ohio, has introduced the 50 Peacekeeper cartridge, a military/police spinoff from his earlier work on .50 Whisper wildcats of various lengths firing .50 BMG bullets from .460 Weatherby, .50 Action Express and other cases (see previous issues). From a 23” barrel, JD says the Peacekeeper will deliver 88% of the velocity of the .50 Browning cartridge, but using only half the powder, and can form the basis of an extremely accurate 13 to 14-pound long-range rifle system. The new cartridge can utilize any projectile suitable for the .50 Browning round or any .50 (.510 diameter) softpoint bullet intended for a .50 calibre hunting cartridge.<br><br>With peak-efficiency muzzle brakes and other measures, felt recoil is said to be substantially less than that of many 30-pound .50 Browning rifles. The new Ed Brown single shot bolt action is one of JD’s preferred hosts for the Peacekeeper round, coupled with any of a wide variety of stocks. Other recommended actions include the Ruger M-77 Magnum or any Weatherby action originally chambered for the .378 or .460 cartridges. JD confirms that the Peacekeeper case is essentially just another full-length .460 Weatherby Magnum blown out to .50, but having first started out using a .510 Wells chamber reamer, he has since developed his own chamber configuration.<br><br>Using a 650gr military API bullet at 2,400 fps from a 23” barrel JD says the Peacekeeper will shoot to the limits of the projectile. He uses a different barrel twist (no, he ain’t saying!) from the .50 BMG standard and says that when firing the 750gr Hornady AMAC bullet you can depend on 0.75 minutes of angle.<br><br>From a practical standpoint, JD says, the Peacekeeper will do anything the .50 Browning can do with the same bullet. Using the 750gr Hornady projectile the MV drops to about 2,250 fps, and it is, JD says, comfortable to shoot, and about the same as the .415 Remington in a sporter.<br><br>JD has already demonstrated the Peacekeeper to the NDIA and at the US army’s Ft Bragg special forces base, where as many as 50 troops tried it and were reportedly very impressed. It can be fired offhand, JD says, by any reasonably strong operator, and muzzle brakes work well with the short barrels.<br><br>Preferred powders so far appear to be 4895, Reloder 15 and AA2520, however JD warns that loads listed in other companies’ manuals for similar cartridges can produce vastly excessive pressures in rifles chambered for the Peacekeeper &#8211; so be sure to consult SSK on loading. JD also suggests the Ruger No 1 action should be avoided with this cartridge.<br><br>JD has also been experimenting with some specialized bullets for the Peacekeeper, some of which, he says, have even out-penetrated the .50 SLAP round in mild steel. Those interested in special military &amp; police .50-calibre applications should contact SSK with their requirements.<br><br>Formed .50 Peacekeeper cartridge cases, bullets, reloading dies and loaded ammunition are all available from: SSK Industries, 590 Woodvue Lane, Wintersville OH 43953, USA. (740-264-0176).<br>http://www.sskindustries.com<br><br><strong>COVERT WEAPONS RECOVERED IN NETHERLANDS</strong>: The Times &amp; others reported in late Oct 2000 that police in Holland had recovered a quantity of unusual covert weapons from addresses in Amsterdam and surrounding towns; they had mostly originated from Yugoslavia. They included 8 four-shot .22-calibre handguns disguised as cellphones, with a firing button on the keypad for each cartridge. In addition there were 29 single-shot key ring guns said to resemble black Zippos, which at first hearing sound rather like the Bulgarian Osa gas pistols (see previous issues), though the Osa has two barrels.<br><br>Police arrested two Yugoslavs, two Croats and a Turk in connection with the weapon haul, but apparently had no firm clues as to whom the eventual recipients were intended to be. In addition to 28 of the key-ring guns, the Times said officers recovered 26 pounds of explosives, a machine gun, two handguns, 20 hand grenades and 2,000 rounds of ammunition from one address, along with 19 pounds of heroin, forged Dutch currency and blank IDs.<br><br>Absent any more precise details of the key-ring guns, we can’t comment on their likely practicality, though the cellphone weapons certainly sound viable and would present a major security threat if they ever appeared on the market in any volume. Think, for example, of the millions of phones passed through airport checks every day, and the numbers also carried by kids. Hirtherto, the most alarming aviation security threat to emerge on the special weapons front was the gun camera, a thousand of which were said to have been ordered some years ago by Libya &#8211; and to be the reason for El Al’s yen for minutely inspecting all their passengers’ photographic kit.<br><br><strong>THERMOLD MAGAZINES IN COLOMBIA</strong>: an AFP photo run by The Observer in the UK showed a heavily-armed drug enforcement policeman on patrol in the Colombian coca fields carrying an M203-equipped M16A2 with what appeared to be a plastic Thermold 30-round magazine and a top-carry sling. Both he and another cop in the background appeared to be carrying M72 rocket launchers across their backs. And both were also wearing US-style Fritz kevlar helmets. Whatever others may be saying, the locals obviously believe there’s a full-scale war on out there; why else would they need the 40mm grenade-launchers and M72s? We can also conclude from this pictorial evidence that the US is almost entirely equipping the Colombians nowadays.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N5 (February 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
