<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>U.S. Ornance &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/u-s-ornance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 20:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>M2 Machine Gun Quick Change Barrel: The QCB Variants</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/m2-machine-gun-quick-change-barrel-the-qcb-variants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guns & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50BMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Ornance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smallarmsreview.com/?p=38516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The major issue with the system, the biggest operator malfunction, and an issue since day one, is that the barrel is removed and installed by the operators in the field and need to be properly gauged before firing. Enter the quick-change barrel (QCB) concept. There have been many attempts at this, a few successful. All share two things; first, interrupted threads where the barrel locks to the extension, and second, a method of guiding the barrel in correctly and rotating into position, which is done with a pin.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By Dan Shea &#8211; </p>



<p>At the end of the World War I, that “War to End All Wars,” there were many lessons learned about the weapons and threats that would be encountered. This was a new kind of war; machine guns, armored vehicles, aircraft, Zeppelins, and underwater craft were among the evolving threats. The U.S. military called once again on the great John Moses Browning, weapon designer extraordinaire, to produce a new heavy machine gun round to counter the new threats. There are different theories on how Browning arrived at the .50 BMG cartridge; one camp believes he simply upsized the U.S. 30.06 cartridge; another that he scaled up the German 1918 13.2x92mm anti-tank cartridge. In truth, it was a combination of both. By 1921, Browning had developed the .50 BMG cartridge as well as the M2 machine gun and its link system; these are still in use today, a century later. There are improvements, of course. The guns went from water-cooled to air cooled, and refinements were made to the cocking system and mounts, but this long-lived system is still on the front lines around the world today.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38550" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">QCB Barrel Comparison: Understanding the channels is critical to determining what variant of the M2A2 you are dealing with. Top to bottom: Standard M2HB showing full threads and no pin or channels; M2A2 (29186) QCB Stellite-lined, note the interrupted threads and the channel is longer to the front than on the other two M2A2 types; M2A2-N this is the Norway contract, Stellite-lined. It has shallower threads than the NATO model. Note the difference, it’s important. M2A2 NATO non-Stellite lined with smaller thread diameter, it’s proprietary to the system; U.S. M2A1 with the locating locking pin on the barrel.</figcaption></figure>



<p>As an aside, gunners are taught to reach up under the retracting charging handle and pull it to the rear, as opposed to reaching over the top, wrist behind the handle. It’s widely believed this method gives better leverage, but that’s not the real reason. Browning’s first designs had a “bottle” charging handle that was directly in the bolt and traveled with the bolt, and if the operator reached over the top to charge and the cartridge fired, it could break the operator’s wrist in recoil. The retracting charging handle was designed to separate the functions. There is a stud that is in the bolt, and the new charging system pulls that to the rear. If there is an accidental firing while the operator holds the handle, the bolt goes to the rear, but the handle is disconnected. No broken wrist. In the ensuing century, there have been many modifications such as this, but the core system, the M2 Heavy Barrel machine gun, “Ma Deuce,” is still with us.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38552" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Full comparison of the threaded ends of the QCB barrel: Left to right: Standard M2HB showing full threads and no pin or channels. M2A2 (29186) QCB Stellite-lined, note the interrupted threads and the full size of the threads. M2A2-N this is the Norway contract, Stellite-lined; it has shallower threads than the NATO model- but the same general diameter and strength. M2A2 NATO non-Stellite lined with smaller thread diameter; its proprietary to the system and an apparent weakness. U.S. M2A1 with the locating locking pin on the barrel and full thread diameter.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The major issue with the system, the biggest operator malfunction, and an issue since day one, is that the barrel is removed and installed by the operators in the field and need to be properly gauged before firing. This requires a set of headspace and timing gauges, as well as proper training. It also takes a significant amount of time to do this properly, especially under pressure in combat. Threading the barrel in and out, and headspacing and timing as needed, is an operator distraction. Most machine gunners know their guns, and develop little tricks to shortcut the system. But unless they’ve been taught to “read the brass” and properly headspace and time the gun, those shortcuts don’t equal proper field performance.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38553" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/6-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">An endemic problem to the systems: on the left is the M2A2-N, the base of the threaded area is at full thickness to that of the other M2A2, M2A1, and the original M2HB barrels; it is robust enough to survive thousands of rounds. On the right is the M2A2-NATO, also called variously the “M2QCB” and it is clear that the diameter of the barrel section under the smaller thread diameter has lost significant mass. This has led to numerous reports of barrels broken on this system after heavy firing.</figcaption></figure>



<p>Enter the quick-change barrel (QCB) concept. There have been many attempts at this, a few successful. All share two things; first, interrupted threads where the barrel locks to the extension, and second, a method of guiding the barrel in correctly and rotating into position, which is done with a pin.</p>



<p><strong>What style of QCB system is in our inventory?</strong></p>



<p>This is a very important question for those in procurement who already have some M2 QCB machine guns in their inventory.</p>



<p>Essentially, whether the pin is on the barrel or on the barrel support designates what basic style of QCB you have. The U.S. DoD-adopted system is the M2A1, and the pin is on the barrel with a guiding slot in the barrel support. The other systems where the pin is part of the barrel support and the guiding slot is in the barrel are variants of the M2A2. Look to the photos to further identify which system you have if you are matching new orders or adding support parts.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="794" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8-1024x678.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38555" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8-1024x678.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8-768x508.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8-750x496.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8-1140x754.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/8.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Working on, and gauging the M2A1 guns is always a challenge, they are quite heavy and fixturing must be robust. US Ordnance uses many of the older M23 “equilibrator mounts” with their ease of movement, this one is in a floor mounted vehicle pedestal mount. But on the gauging tables, the M23 was mounted to a MK16 Mod 0 Naval “flower pot.” (I’m stealing this work system for my shop, it&#8217;s just brilliant). M2A1 receivers are lined up for inspection in the background.</figcaption></figure>



<p>The strength of the pins used in all systems are an issue, and how to repair them if damaged. The basic M2A1 pin diameter is .376 inches, and it is installed into the barrel as shown in the M2A1 photos. The M2A2 pin diameter is .446 and it is a replaceable part in the barrel support. So, if damaged, this is easily repaired at the depot level. For the M2A1, they use a TIG system to install the guidance pin in the barrel well. Because of the apparent issue with M2A1, barrel pins being damaged by exuberant and perhaps not so observant operators, U.S. Ordnance can repair existing barrels by installing a new stud, but they’ve also come up with a solution for government consideration. A pin of the same diameter and height is used, but it has a wider base and a not so radical 90-degree angle at its base. It has a much more supportive radius, and is more robust and should limit the damage done by improper assembly of the M2A1 systems. The M2A2 and M2A2-N do not suffer from an issue here, as stated, the guidance pin is replaceable in the barrel support.</p>



<p>As another aside, if the barrel guidance pin is removed from the barrel support of the M2A2 system, regular M2HB barrels can be used in the system for in an emergency or training scenario.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38556" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/9.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">In the testing and assembly area, headspace and timing are factory set. There are six gauges used for timing, in increments from .020 to .116 inches. Headspace is set, however there are differences in the M2A1 system and M2A2 systems. After the barrel supports are clocked into place (half shims are used as needed), the M2A1 has 16 different breech locks that can be installed depending on the factory headspacing. This is a bit of a nightmare for the depot level armorers in the field. The M2A2 system has only one breech block.</figcaption></figure>



<p>Manroy Engineering, FN Herstal, General Dynamics, Ohio Ordnance Works, and U.S. Ordnance have all been manufacturers of variants of QCB. I’ve had the pleasure of working with all of the above over the years, testing the firearms, and there are many fine products. That said, on my recent visit to U.S. Ordnance in the Reno, Nevada area, I confirmed that US Ordnance is in production and support of all of the QCB variants, and is the U.S. DoD contractor supplying the U.S. M2A1 to the U.S. military and allies with foreign military sales or private purchase contract ability. They can fill orders for new guns, provide rebuilds, and repair/support parts with almost any .50 BMG variant. Thus, this report has focused on information gained at the U.S. Ordnance facility.</p>



<p>During the tour of its manufacturing facility, U.S. Ordnance employee Beaux Armand explained the full testing procedure. Most impressive is the requirement to build ten guns, run them through all gauging, testing and cleaning, then completely disassemble all ten, mix the parts and then gauge and test again. All ten guns must pass this rigorous acceptance testing. More about the gauging is in the accompanying photos and captions. </p>



<p>We at SADJ hope this look into the QCB world of .50 caliber machine guns helps you to understand what’s on the market, properly identify what may be in your inventory, and answer the questions you might have. I’m available regarding serious enquiries on technical issues, as always, at <strong>info@chipotlepublishing.com</strong>. U.S. Ordnance can be contacted for further<strong> </strong>information at <strong><a href="mailto:sales@usord.com">sales@usord.com</a></strong>.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="348" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7-1024x297.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38554" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7-1024x297.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7-300x87.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7-768x223.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7-750x218.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7-1140x331.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/7.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A fine cutaway example of Stellite lining in an M2A2 system barrel. During WWII, when the AN-M2 (Army-Navy M2 Aircraft) guns were first tried, the barrels were thinned to the smallest possible diameter. Saving weight was paramount when aircraft mounted; the less gun weight, the more ammo you could carry. In aerial combat, long bursts were fired, and the thin barrels tended to burn out quickly. It was standard procedure for the armorers to ask if the guns had been fired, and if so, they just figured they gave them “the whole nine yards” the length of a machine gun belt in the U.S. aircraft, and thus the barrel was just replaced. No point in gauging it, it would be burned out and a fresh one used for the next mission. This is very costly, so various linings were tried, and the Stellite liner came out of this design period. Several variants were made in that period, some with full lining, some partial. As can be seen in the cutaway example here, today’s Stellite liner is a partial lining, installed in the area where friction heat is most prominent as a too large bullet is pressure forced/formed into a too small bore and the highest heat from the burning propellant gases is happening. Stellite is a “superalloy” that has very small amounts of iron, it is primarily cobalt based with a significant chromium and tungsten component as well as carbon. It’s very resistant to high heat, pressure, and physical wear, and extends the life of barrels considerably. Superalloys like Stellite are also very resistant to thermal creep deformation. Making Stellite-lined barrels like this is a special manufacturing skill, the liner must perfectly mate up with the bore and remain so, thus the importance of deformation resistance. As a final note, US Ordnance can supply chromium lined barrels on their machine gun offerings; chromium at a minimum of .002 inch. Remember that the chrome is tapered, tightening at the muzzle end, there is a continuing diminishing taper and quite an art to achieve this.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="768" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11-768x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38582" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11-225x300.jpg 225w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/11.jpg 900w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">U.S. Ordnance’s testing and gauging crew came up with this interesting firing pin protrusion gauge using a Mitutoyo 1410A depth gauge and an house-made adapter for firing pins.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="768" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12-768x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38583" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12-225x300.jpg 225w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/12.jpg 900w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This custom modified ProCheck gauge uses copper slugs to judge not only firing pin protrusion on firing, but proper strength of the firing pin.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="678" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13-1024x678.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38584" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13-1024x678.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13-300x199.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13-768x508.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13-750x496.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13-1140x754.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/13.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">U.S. M2A1 machine guns ready for final testing at U.S. Ordnance’s facility.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38585" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/15.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">.50 caliber barrel blanks lined up for final milling procedures.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38586" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/16.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Unfortunately, some customers specifically did not order the field gauges in the belief that the operators no longer needed to gauge the QCB guns. This is not true. While on the M2A1 and M2A2 QCB guns the operators cannot gauge and adjust their headspace, they can certainly gauge to see if the guns are out of headspace (no-go) and need to go back to the armorers. On the left is the standard M2HB Headspace &amp; Timing Gauge (Gauge 5351211) with a “Go” of .202 inches and “No-Go” of .206 inches. “Fire” starts at .020 inches (Gauge 5351214) and reaches “No-Fire” at .116 inches (Gauge 5351213). On the right is the QCB gauge issued with the M2A2: Headspace &amp; Timing Gauge (Gauge 29196) with only a “No-Go” of .212 inches. The same timing as M2HB, “Fire” starts at .020 inches (Gauge 5351214) and reaches “No-Fire” at .116 inches (Gauge 5351213). Read your brass; the operator of a QCB machine gun should be capable of gauging the headspace for no-go but should also be reading the brass, looking for anomalies such as swelling, cracking, too much blow-by propellant residue, damage from extraction or ejection.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="1019" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-1024x1019.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38587" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-1024x1019.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-300x300.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-150x150.jpg 150w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-768x764.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-75x75.jpg 75w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-750x746.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison-1140x1134.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/17-ammo-comparison.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Ammunition comparison, left to right: 5.56x45mm linked ammunition for size comparison; 13.2x92mm for the 1918 anti-tank rifle, note the tapered case and the rim at the base, this is the cartridge size given to John Browning for the M2 program. .50 BMG ball cartridge (12.7x99mm) that was the 1921 design and is still in operation as M33 Ball today. The .50 caliber became popular as a size, this is the .55 Boys anti-tank rifle cartridge from the 1930s (14.3x99mm). Last of the large anti-tank shoulder fired cartridges, the 20x138mm Lahti round. The Soviet Union wanted their own .50 cal., and the cartridge case is 9mm longer than Browning’s design—this is the 12.7x108mm round for the DShK and NSV systems. The Soviets took it up a step in 1941 to make the 14.5x114mm anti-tank cartridge for the shoulder fired PTRS and PTRD anti-tank rifles, then adapted and powered up the cartridge for the KPV/KPVT machine guns.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="768" height="1024" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/3-768x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38588" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/3-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/3-225x300.jpg 225w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/3-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/3.jpg 900w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Barrel Support Identification: Top to bottom: Standard M2HB for threaded barrel. M2A2 system that does not have the stud installed. M2A2-N Norway contract with the stud installed and staked into position, and with the special Norwegian threaded end for the proprietary Norwegian blank firing attachment and the thread protector covers (US Ordnance added a device to keep from rotating off). M2A1 U.S. DoD issue with the channel for the barrel pin to travel in.</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-1024x768.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-38589" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-300x225.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-768x576.jpg 768w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-750x563.jpg 750w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/4.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A better view of the two QCB style barrel supports. Top: M2A2-N Norwegian contract, looking at the center of the support, note the screw head staked into position. This is the replaceable guide pin for the barrel to slide over. If the pin breaks or is damaged, it can be changed out at depot level. Bottom: U.S. M2A1 barrel support showing the full channel that the barrel pin will travel in. Barrel pins are subject to frequent damage, and it’s a factory replacement job to fix them.</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
