<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Vince Oliva &#8211; Small Arms Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smallarmsreview.com/tag/vince-oliva/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smallarmsreview.com</link>
	<description>Explore the World of Small Arms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 18:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SPANISH STAR Z-63</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/spanish-star-z-63/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10 (Jul 2002)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanish Star Z-63]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Oliva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z-62]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z-63]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z-70]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Vince Oliva My first encounter with the STAR Z series subgun was in 1981 when the US Air Force provided me a three year tour to the wonderful country of Spain. My assigned Communications site was named Humosa RRL, within the small village of Humosa, basically a Radio Relay Link supporting the main base [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Vince Oliva</strong><br><br>My first encounter with the STAR Z series subgun was in 1981 when the US Air Force provided me a three year tour to the wonderful country of Spain. My assigned Communications site was named Humosa RRL, within the small village of Humosa, basically a Radio Relay Link supporting the main base of Torrejon Air Base, which is located near the magnificent city of Madrid. Please note that all U.S. Military personnel and equipment are guests of the Spanish Government and all military bases have always been the sole property of and under control of the Government of Spain.<br><br>Normal entry to the Spanish military facilities was always through the Main Gate and naturally guarded by Spanish military personnel shouldering the Star Z series subgun. Another agency that utilized the Star Z subguns were the Guardia Civil (the Spanish National Police). I observed the Guardia Civil with the STAR Z’s guarding the front of their police stations, all Embassies, State functions and patrols in the Basque regional area of northern Spain, where for many years and currently civil unrest still exists. During my 3 year tour I also observed that the Z-62, Z-63 and Z-70s were slowly being replaced by the CETME C-2, officially called the CB-64 and the Z-84 (an UZI look-alike).</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="700" height="350" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-20.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8452" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-20.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/001-20-300x150.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Z-63, right side, stock folded and locked into barrel jacket. The butt plate makes an excellent forward grip.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Spain started manufacturing arms at the turn of the century, mostly in small family shops. After WW1 the small shops produced many copies of Colts and Browning besides their own designs. The numerous small arms businesses flourished until the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) when the Franco regime only allowed three commercial arms manufacturers to continue operation after 1939. These were Star, located in Eibar; Astra-Unceta, in Guernica; and Gabilonda y Cia, in Elgoibar (producers of the Llama guns).<br><br>“Star” (trade name) Bonifacio Echeverria, SA firm was established in 1905 from the family operation by the brothers Bonifacio and Julian Echeverria Orbea. Besides “Star”, the firm also used another trade mark on their early firearms known as “Izarra” (meaning Star in the Basque Language), but the Star name trademark was fully adopted due to respect of their Basque family heritage. Unfortunately this fine firm closed its doors on July 28, 1997.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="207" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-24.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8454" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-24.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/002-24-300x89.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Z-63, left side, folding stock extended with 30 round magazine.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>From 1905 to 1930 “Star” mostly produced pistols. Machine pistols were incorporated into the inventory from 1930-1952 and the submachine guns development started in the 1930’s. It wasn’t until after WWII that the Spanish submachine guns really appear on the market. Some of the early “Star” submachine guns were the SI-35, TN-35, and the RU-35.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" width="700" height="457" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-21.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8453" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-21.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/003-21-300x196.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Z-63, left side, folding stock clearing the inserted Mag.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>This article and photos are about the Star Z-63 in my possession.<br><br>When I spotted this firearm at Knob Creek a few years ago it brought back many fond memories of Spain. Naturally I didn’t need it, but wanted it. So be it. This particular model Z-63 was imported by “Law Enforcement Ordnance, Athens Ga.” as stamped on the right side of the magazine well. The left side of the magazine well is the “Star” logo, Model and serial number.<br><br>I was verbally assured (no written documentation) that this particular gun was one of many utilized in the TV series “Miami Vice”. I wasn’t a Miami Vice/Don Johnson fan and had never watched any of the unrealistic “Bulletproof cop” shows.<br><br>Some of the physical proof that this was a movie/TV gun is that the barrel rifling has been bored out a couple of inches to accept a blank adapter and the mags that were modified from original Z-70 Mags.<br><br>The Z series Submachine guns are, Z-45, Z-55, Z-62, Z-63, Z-70, Z-70B and the Z-84. Up until the Z-63, the primary caliber has been 9mm Largo(9&#215;23). With the Z-63, the primary caliber for manufacturing became 9mm Parabellum (9&#215;19). The Z-45 design was based on the German MP-40 design with an improvement of a forward bolt latch safely on the bolt handle. Basically, this automatic safety provides a high degree of protection from accidental firing caused by dropping the weapon with a loaded magazine inserted and the bolt pulled back, or when the bolt is cocked half way and accidentally released. To fire the weapon, one has to disengage (grip or squeezes) the latch safety on the Mag well.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="242" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-23.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8455" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-23.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/004-23-300x104.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /></figure></div>



<p>The Z-62/63 incorporates this automatic added safety but in a different format from the Z-45. The automatic safety latch is pivoted into the bolt. Forward movement of the bolt tends to keep the latch in its disengaged position. A sudden jar when the bolt closes tends to engage the latch. If the bolt closes slowly, the latch engages. To normally disengage the safety latch one has to pull the charging handle. Two rods can be seen on the face of the bolt. One operates the pivoting hammer when the bolt closes. The other releases the automatic safety when the bolt is pulled to the rear by the charging handle.<br><br>The manual applied safety is a push button/cross bolt type located in the center of the firing grip trigger housing.<br><br>The Z-62 made its entrance to the market in 1962, the Z-63 a few years later. Basically the Z-62 and Z-63 are identical, except in the following four areas.<br><br>First, the Z-62 Model was chambered for either the 9mm Bergmann-Bayard (Largo) cartridge or the Parabellum. (note: During my research I could not identify how the Z-62 was marked to distinguish the two different Calibers). When the world wide trend standardized the 9mm Parabellum round, the model Z-62 in 9mm Bergmann-Bayard was discontinued and the 9mm Parabellum version was redesigned as the Z-63.<br><br>Second, the Z-62 barrel chamber was longer for the Bergmann-Bayard (Largo) Cartridge.*<br><br>Third, the internal dimensions of the Mag well on the Z-62 Bergmann-Bayard is 1.45 inches long to facilitate the longer 9mm Largo cartridge magazine. These dimensions were changed on the Z-70/70B to 1.30 inches to facilitate the 9mm Parabellum Mag.<br><br>Fourth, naturally the magazine. A metal spacer tab was welded on the front part of the magazines for the 9 mm Parabellum. This provides a snug functional fit for the larger Mag well. The Z-70/70B incorporates the smaller Mag well and no spacer was needed.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="482" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-16.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8456" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-16.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/005-16-300x207.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Z-63, broken down into its 10 major parts.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Essentially the Z-63 Model production is exactly the same as the Z-62, except for the internals of the barrel.<br><br>The very unique operation of this weapon is that the trigger also serves as the fire-selector. Notice that the trigger housing is large and the trigger is very long and has two finger trigger grooves. Pulling the lower portion of the trigger groove operates the semiautomatic firing. The lower trigger operates the sear via disconnector, which becomes disengaged from the sear when the bolt starts forward to fire a single shot.<br><br>For full auto function, pulling on the upper portion will pivot the trigger in a way that the disconnector cannot become disengaged from the sear.<br><br>I found it a little uncomfortable (less control) to use only one finger for the full auto operation. I preferred to use two fingers for the full auto mode, the index finger resting on the upper groove and the middle finger resting on the lower groove, now my fingers are actually serving as the firing mode selector.<br><br>Because this little subgun has no selector switch, some of my fellow “TASK” [Triad Action Shooters Club (of North Carolina)] members ask if I cheat a little on the subgun matches because during competition most of my shots are singles. The rules are; “The selector has to be on full auto”. Since I use two fingers, only I know which mode I am in.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="540" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-11.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8457" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-11.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/006-11-300x231.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Z-63 and Z-70 magazines. The top Mag is a standard issue for the Z-70. The middle Mag is a modified Z-70 Mag to fit the Z-63. The bottom Mag is a factory standard issue for the Z-63.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Shooting this subgun is pure pleasure and very controllable in the full auto mode. The sights are acceptable, the front being of a hooded blade and the rear flip type in 100 and 200 meters. I did find some trouble in ammunition selection. When I used cheap standard 115gr. ammo, I found that the spent cartridges did not eject up and away from the gun and in a few cases the spent shells did not fully eject or fell back into the receiver. This of course jams the action. Utilizing hotter ammo such as “Hirtenberger” eliminated this problem. We have to remember that the Z-62 was designed for the 9mm Largo, which has a bit more punch that the Parabellum and the Z-63 design change was only to the barrel. I suspect the Spanish Military recognized this problem a long time ago and issued or already had hotter ammunition than their standard 9mm Parabellum Mil. Spec.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="325" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-10.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8458" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-10.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/007-10-300x139.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Barrels for the Z-63 and Z-70, Absolutely no difference dimensionally or cosmetic. The fins on the end of the barrel are utilized as a locking mechanism in the barrel jacket and also provide a better cooling surface.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Another unique item is that the stock folds and locks neatly into the ventilated barrel jacket. When the stock is folded locked forward, the buttplate makes a controllable and comfortable, firm horizontal forward grip&#8230;thus a large machine pistol. Additionally the stock is designed to swing from the folded to extended position with 30 round magazine inserted.<br><br>Loading and cocking this weapon is accomplished by the left hand; the right hand never having to leave the pistol grip. The Mag release is a push button located at the left rear bottom of the Mag well. The cocking handle is forward left and 2 inches from the end of the muzzle and is spring-loaded return.<br><br>I was worried about getting parts. Luckily, talking to Bob Landies, I was informed that he just received a whole brand new shipment of Z-70s. These guns were pristine new! Bob said he had tears in his eyes when he destroyed the receivers to make part kits. Bob also assured me that the Z-70s parts are all the same except for the Mag well. Sure enough, he was absolutely correct. The Big Bonus is that the Z-70 trigger housing fits and operates perfectly in the Z-63 receiver.<br><br><strong>Basic Disassembly: Z-62/63/70/70B</strong><br></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="618" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-9.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8459" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-9.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/008-9-300x265.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Top trigger housing is the Z-70. Lower trigger housing is the Z-63.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="425" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-8.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8460" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-8.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/009-8-300x182.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Front view of barrel and Z-70 barrel jacket (from parts kit). The fins on the barrel end acts like a sprocket/gear that is inserted into the serrated end of the barrel jacket. When rotated a quarter of a turn, it locks the barrel in place. Charging handle is extended.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="440" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-7.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8461" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-7.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/010-7-300x189.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Left is a Z-63 bolt. Right is the Z-70.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Remove Magazine, insure cartridge chamber is empty.</li><li>Remove cap on the rear of receiver by depressing recoil disk in the center of the cap and rotate to either side. Keep a grip on this cap, the recoil spring will cause the cap to go airborne during this stage.</li><li>Hold the weapon down and pull the cocking handle completely to the rear. Release handle and raise the muzzle straight up. The bolt will slide back and fall out, that’s if the receiver isn’t completely full of crud. Note: The receiver has 6 small internal indentations that I would call bolt guide rails, the bolt is slotted for these rail indentations. Basically the bolt rides the rails and no bolt rotation can occur. One may have to push the bolt back lightly with a finger from the chamber area.</li><li>Remove the trigger housing by pushing out the retainer pin located on the upper rear part of the housing. Grip the trigger housing, pull back and then down.</li><li>Removing the barrel is a little tricky because barrel removal is through the receiver. Point the muzzle up, grasp the barrel at the muzzle, rotate it clockwise a quarter of a turn, the fins of the barrel will fall through the slots on the end of the receiver barrel jacket. Let the barrel slide back but ensure that the U-shaped notch below the breech is in line with the bolt guide rails.</li><li>Re-assembly is the reverse, but naturally never easy the first time around, especially with the barrel design on this weapon.</li></ul>



<p><strong>Z-62/63 Weapon Specification:</strong></p>



<p>Cartridge: 9mm Bergmann-Bayard (Largo) or Parabellum*<br>Operation: Blowback, Openbolt<br>Cyclic rate of Fire: 550 rpm<br>Length, extended stock: 27.56 inches (700 mm)<br>Length, retracted stock: 18.9 inches (480 mm)<br>Barrel length: 7.87 inches (200 mm)<br>Weight, unloaded: 5.84 lb. (2.65 kg)<br>Type of feed: Two-position, two-column<br>Magazine capacity: 20, 30, or 40 rounds**<br>Rifling and twist: 6, Right<br>Approx. muzzle velocity: 1,200 fps (370 m/s)<br>Sight, front: Blade, hooded<br>Sight, rear: Flip peep, 100 and 200 meters</p>



<p>* The Z-62 incorporated both Largo and Parabellum. The Z-63 in 9mm Parabellum only.<br>** The Z-62 magazines were offered with either 20, 30 or 40 rounds. The Z-63 was only offered with a 30 round.</p>



<p><em><strong>A special thanks to Dave Hiester for Photo assistance.</strong></em></p>



<p>Sources: The World’s Machine Pistols and Submachine guns. Vol. II</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V5N10 (July 2002)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MP34 Maschinen Pistole in 45ACP!</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/mp34-maschinen-pistole-in-45acp/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N7 (Apr 2001)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maschinen Pistole 34]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP34]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S1-100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solothurn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Oliva]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=2084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Vince Oliva Every so often we find a vintage weapon in an unusual, odd ball caliber. Not saying that the 45 ACP is an odd caliber, we all know the 45 ACP is the original old war/horse. In this scenario, we have a classic, German designed, MP34 chambered for a 45 ACP cartridge instead [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>By <strong>Vince Oliva</strong><br><br><em>Every so often we find a vintage weapon in an unusual, odd ball caliber. Not saying that the 45 ACP is an odd caliber, we all know the 45 ACP is the original old war/horse. In this scenario, we have a classic, German designed, MP34 chambered for a 45 ACP cartridge instead of the standard European 9mm round. First let me pass on a little history of the MP34(ö)</em><br><br>Cultured Austria did very little in the field of weapons development prior to WWII. They did develop one submachine gun which attained fairly wide usage before and during WWII. The MP34(ö) is commonly known as the Steyr Solothurn. This weapon is a product of German design worked out at Waffenfabrik Solothurn A.G. of Solothurn, Switzerland. Solothurn A.G. was a Swiss industrial company owned by Rheinmettal A.G. of Germany. Herr Louise Stange of the Rheinmettal Company of Dusseldorf originally designed the MP34 in 1924. Under the terms of the Versaillies Treaty, Rheinmettal was forbidden to develop or manufacture military arms. To circumvent this restriction, Rhienmettal A.G. acquired a Swiss company called Solothurn AG in 1929 and used this company to produce the prototypes and accomplished development engineering. But the Solothurn AG was not equipped to produce in quantity, so Rheinmettal now took a controlling interest in the Waffenfabrik Steyr and arranged for the weapon to be put in production as the “Steyr-Solothurn” sub-machine gun. It was widely sold throughout the world in a variety of calibers.<br><br>The Austrian MP34 was “kindly adopted” by the Germans when they took over Austria in 1938 and was called by the Germans MP34(ö) &#8211; Maschinen Pistole 34 Õsterreich-, (Õsterreich meaning Austrian). The weapon was widely used by German police and rear area units. The weapon in various modifications and caliber’s was offered commercially and obviously the 45ACP for export only. Chile, El Salvador, Bolivia, and Uruguay were some of the known importers. The Japanese had a few extremely limited quantities in 7.63 Mauser. The commercial designation for the weapon is SI-100. It is probable that all the MP34s(ö) used by Austria were made by Steyr, as from 1930 on, the gun was known as the Steyr Solothurn.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="554" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002t.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11235" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002t.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002t-300x237.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/002t-600x475.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em><strong>A</strong>) MP34 in 45 ACP. Close-up view of receiver &#8211; notice the slot cut into the top cover for bolt safety lock. To open top cover one has to push the rear latch forward and lift. <strong>B</strong>) MP34 in 9mm. Close-up view of receiver &#8211; the bolt safeties can be engaged in two ways. First &#8211; the bolt can be locked forward into the barrel by sliding the forward safety slide bar to the front push pin. Second &#8211; the bolt can be locked back by pulling the bolt back to the (ready to fire) open bolt position then slide the forward safety bar forward.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The MP34 as used by the Austrian Army and was chambered for the 9mm Mauser cartridge. It was also issued to the Austrian police in 9mm Steyr, both calibers were found in German service or police units. When Austria was incorporated into the Third Reich the weapon was taken into German Army service as the MP34(ö) (ö for Õsterreich) and extensively used. Then re-chambered for the more common 9mm Parabellum round.<br><br>Note: do not confuse the Bergmann MP34 with the MP34(ö). The MP34 is the only subgun designed by Bergmann. Manufactured by Carl Walter Waffenfabrik, Zella-Mehlis, Junker &amp; Ruh AG, Karlsruhe.<br><br>The Bergmann MP34 has a double trigger of peculiar form; pulling the front trigger gave single shots, but further pressure caused it to bear on the secondary trigger to give automatic fire. Whereas the MP34(ö) has the selector on the left side of the stock and also the Bergmann MP34 has a built in compensator at the muzzle and a safety slot cut into the top receiver cover for the bolt to be safely locked back.<br><br><strong>Unusual Features of MP34</strong>(ö)<br><br>The weapon is typical of the period in which it was made of heavy forging. The only unusual feature is the Magazine loader in which is machined into the magazine housing. The magazine is inserted into the underside of the magazine housing and is then loaded with ten round chargers-stripper clips through the opening in the top of the magazine housing.<br>Note: On the 45 ACP version the magazine housing is of a solid piece of stock and the Magazines are loaded in the conventional method.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="507" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-108.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11237" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-108.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-108-300x217.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-108-600x435.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>MP34 Magazine wells. Top shows a one solid piece for the 45 ACP. Bottom is the typical magazine well opening for loading chargers to strip the bullets into the magazine.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Characteristics of Austrian MP34(ö) Submachine gun</strong><br><br>Caliber: 9mm Mauser (Army Model)<br>System of Operation: Blowback<br>Weight loaded: 9.87 lbs.<br>Barrel length: 7.80 in.<br>Feed mechanism: 32 round detachable, staggered box magazine.<br>Sights: Front: Barney corn<br>Rear: Tangent with “V” notch graduated from 50-500 meters in 50-meter increments.<br>Muzzle velocity: 1300 fps (for 9mm Mauser)<br>Cyclic rate:500 rounds per minute.<br>Bayonet: &#8211; utilized the Austrian M95</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="353" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-95.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11238" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-95.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-95-300x151.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-95-600x303.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>MP34 Top Covers. Top cover in 45 ACP. Bottom cover in 9mm. To open top cover the rear push pin has to be depressed and the rear latch cover pushed forward and lifted at the same time. This sounds like a complicated procedure, but by simply doing it is much simpler than explaining it. Note the 45 sight is in measurements of 30 -110 meters in 10 meter increments. The 9mm is 50-500 meter in 50 meter increments</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p><strong>Solothurn S1-100 Civilian version</strong><br><br>The Solothurn S1-100 in Austrian guise as the MP34(ö) or Steyn-Solothurn<br><br>Caliber:9mm<br>Length:33.5 in<br>Weight:8lb 8oz<br>Barrel:7.75in long, 6 grooves, right hand twist<br>Feed System: 32 round detachable box magazine<br>System of operation: Blowback, selective fire<br>Cyclic rate: 500rpm<br>Manufactures: Waffenfabrik Solothurn AG, Solothurn, Switzerland, Waffenfabrik Steyr, Steyr, Austria<br><br>The S1-100 is generally considered to be the ‘Rolls-Royce’ of sub-machine guns, made of the finest available materials and finished to the highest possible standard. Its mechanism is quite simple, the usual bolt having its return spring housed in the wooded buttstock, and the firing pin being separate. It fires from an open bolt in the usual blowback mode. One of the most unusual features is the incorporation of a magazine loading device in the magazine housing. The first specimens of this weapon were generally made in 7.63mm Mauser caliber or 9mm Steyr, and ammunition of these types was always supplied in pre-packed 10-round chargers for use in the pistols. So that these chargers could be used for loading the sub-machine gun magazines, the magazine housing has a slot in top and bottom; the empty magazine could be withdrawn from its housing and slipped into the bottom slot. Chargers of cartridges were then inserted into guides in the top slot and the rounds stripped down into the magazine.<br><br><strong>MP34 in 45 ACP</strong><br><br>I had acquired this weapon from Ron Darnell of Darnell’s Gun Works &amp; Range of Bloomington, IL. Ron had set up a table at the Spring 2000 Knob Creek shoot and this is where I spotted this beauty. Ron was cleaning house one day “actually he was building a new one” and decided to clean up this treasure that he acquired many years before from an estate sale. From what information that Ron passed on to me is that a bunch of these MP34s were imported into the U.S. by ARMEX in the early 1980s from South and Central America.<br><br>The weapon was in fair condition and missing the very rare 45ACP Magazine. Mike Grady; is the Gunsmith for Darnells Gun Works, Mike and Ron got to looking closely at the gun and realized that other than the bolt, barrel (9mm), top cover and magazine housing everything was essentially the same as the standard Steyr 9mm. The 45 ACP barrel threads and physical dimensions were the same for the standard 9mm barrel, His biggest obstacle was to make a Magazine adapter to fit in the Magazine housing for the standard 9mm mags. No problem for Mike, as the master that he is, Mike machined out an adapter in the precise internal dimensions of the magazine well. Mike also hand polished a re-blue to the steel better than the Old World Masters. Now to find the MP34 45ACP magazine, well a few phone calls to many of the industries best and good old Bob Landies came up with one.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="333" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-76.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11239" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-76.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-76-300x143.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-76-600x285.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>MP34 Bolts. Top Bolt in 45 ACP. Bottom Bolt in 9mm.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Another factor that I can not verify is the total number of models made in 45 ACP. Ron Darnell seems to remember reading some where that about 500 hundred were made but again not verified.<br><br>Shooting this firearm is pure pleasure; it lifts and fits naturally to my shoulder and the sight alignment seems natural. But again shooting the same gun in different calibers is night and day. The 9mm is smooth and very, very controllable. Whereas the 45ACP is also smooth and controllable but you know you are shooting a 45 and the shooter has to master the extra energy of the 45.<br><br>One discrepancy that I found between previous published information and my measurements are the overall lengths of the barrels. My measurements on the 45 ACP barrel and my 9mm parts kit barrel are identical at 8.12 inches. Other published listings were of 7.8 and 7.75 inches.<br><br>Magazines in 45 ACP are as rare as hens teeth. I have only one original 20 round Magazine. My research did not afford me any information on this subject. I do not know if they made 10,15 or 30 round 45ACP mags for this gun. I have a modified 30 round Thompson mag that has been cut and reshaped that works quite well and I have been looking at the possibility of modifying Grease gun mags. You fellow shooters know nothing works best other than the originals.<br><br>Now we have a firearm that shoots both calibers that takes less than 2 minutes to change.<br><br><strong>From 45 ACP to 9mm in steps</strong>: Naturally reverse order to change.<br><br>1. Open top cover and remove (one screw).<br>2. Pull back and lift out 45 ACP Bolt<br>3. Unscrew 45 ACP barrel<br>4. Screw in 9mm barrel &#8211; no specific torque, just snug with adjustable wrench.<br>5. Install 9mm Bolt<br>6. Install 9mm top cover<br>7. Install 9mm magazine well adapter<br><br><strong>Specifications of this Featured MP34 in 45 ACP</strong><br><br>Weight: 9.75 lbs.<br>Weight: &#8211; Fully loaded with 22 round Mag. 230gr. Bullets &#8211; 11 lbs.<br>Barrel length &#8211; 8.125 inches<br>Bolt weight &#8211; without guide rod &#8211; 2.25 lbs.<br>Bolt length &#8211; without guide rod &#8211; 7.13 inches<br>Bolt length &#8211; with guide rod &#8211; 13.88 inches<br>Feed mechanism: 20 round detachable, staggered box magazine.<br>Sights: Front: Barney corn.<br>Rear: Tangent with “V” notch graduated from 30-110 meters in 10-meter increments.<br>Cyclic Rate: Unknown at this time. I didn’t have the proper electronic measuring devices at the time of this writing but on firing the 45ACP model it was very audible to myself and by other firearm enthusiasts that the cycling rate was much faster. This was due to the nature of physics &#8211; basically looking at the physical dimensions of the 45 Bolt &#8211; it is larger and longer than the 9mm bolt, thus a shorter stroke or travel distance.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="302" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-49.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11240" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-49.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-49-300x129.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-49-600x259.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>Top Bayonet &#8211; M1934 SIMSON/SUHL Bottom Bayonet &#8211; M95 STEYR</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>*The Receiver Top Bolt cover incorporates the safety bolt slot cut into the side. Whereas the 9mm has the push button safety on the top receiver cover for the bolt. *The bolt does not have the safety slot cut like the 9mm<br><br><strong>Specification of this Featured 9mm parts kit incorporated into the MP34 45ACP Receiver.</strong><br><br>Weight: 9.125 lbs.<br>Weight: &#8211; Fully loaded with 32 round Mag. 115 gr. Bullets &#8211; 10.5 lbs.<br>Barrel length &#8211; 8.125 inches<br>Bolt weight &#8211; 1.75 lbs.<br>Bolt length &#8211; without guide rod &#8211; 5.75 inches<br>Bolt length &#8211; with guide rod &#8211; 12.5 inches<br>Feed mechanism: 32 round detachable, staggered box magazine.<br><br>Incorporates push button top receiver cover safety. Does not incorporate safety bolt slot cut, but incorporates push button lock down<br>Sights: Front: Barney corn<br>Rear: Tangent with “V” notch graduated from 50-500 meters in 50-meter increments.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="608" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-40.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-11242" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-40.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-40-300x261.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/007-40-600x521.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption><em>MP34 Magazines. <strong>TOP</strong> &#8211; 20 round 45 ACP. <strong>Bottom</strong> &#8211; 9mm Steyr with mag adapter.</em></figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Another feature is the ability for bayonet attachment. The Austrians did not want to re-invent the wheel so they incorporated the Steyr 1895 rifle bayonet, also known as the M95 bayonet to fit on the MP34. I found that the M1934 (modified M1904 bayonet) Solothurn SMG bayonet made by Simson &amp; Co. of Suhl for Portugal fits perfect. The M1934 bayonet is one inch longer than the M95 Steyr bayonet. Neither of these Bayonets will fit the 45ACP model because the muzzle diameter of the 45ACP barrel is .04 inches wider than the 9mm barrel. I filed and sanded the inside barrel port of the M95 bayonet and it fits perfect on the 45 barrel. I do not believe a specific bayonet was made for the 45ACP model and the modification I performed were probably the same.<br><br>Note: Some technical data specifications are from the book: Small Arms of the world by Smith and Smith (Stackpole books) 1969</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N7 (April 2001)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Spring 2000 Knob Creek Belt-Fed Competition</title>
		<link>https://smallarmsreview.com/the-spring-2000-knob-creek-belt-fed-competition/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SAR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 20:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search by Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N2 (Nov 2000)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belt fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knob Creek Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Oliva]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dev.smallarmsreview.com/?p=1837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The balloons are the targets and the white paper represented hostages. NO hostages were hit! By Vince Oliva The American Class 3 Association sponsored and put together a Belt Fed Match. Tony Gooch, President and Chairman of the American Class 3 Association molded and put forth a new event that will be a regular feature [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p style="font-size:14px"><em>The balloons are the targets and the white paper represented hostages. NO hostages were hit!</em></p>



<p>By <strong>Vince Oliva</strong><br><br>The American Class 3 Association sponsored and put together a Belt Fed Match. Tony Gooch, President and Chairman of the American Class 3 Association molded and put forth a new event that will be a regular feature at KCR.<br><br>The rules of engagement were that any belt fed machine gun of less than .50 caliber may be used and fired only from a mount. The mount for the gun may be a tripod, quad leg mount, sled or wheeled mount.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="458" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-53.jpg" alt="" data-id="10675" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-53.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/11/01/the-spring-2000-knob-creek-belt-fed-competition/001-53-4/#main" class="wp-image-10675" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-53.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-53-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/001-53-600x393.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Mike Bergmann, Drew Kretzschmar, and Ed Beyer appear to have been confused in leaving the 9th hole. Tony Gootch (in red) officiates.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p>The gun shall not be mounted to the mount until the crew has entered the “bunker”. The bunker in this scenario was square bales of hay stacked to create a wall with a port hole.<br><br>No tracer or incendiary ammo was allowed. Belt length restrictions were that the first belt must contain no more that 50 rounds and no less than 25 rounds and there shall be one mandatory belt change. There were no belt length restrictions after the first change.<br><br>Two separate classes of entries were set up for this match, Tripod and Bipod. Bipod had the same rules except for the mounting portion.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="196" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-62-300x196.jpg" alt="" data-id="10677" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-62.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/11/01/the-spring-2000-knob-creek-belt-fed-competition/003-62-3/#main" class="wp-image-10677" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-62-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-62-600x393.jpg 600w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/003-62.jpg 700w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>The RED (Russian) Team. Trigger man Bob Raymond, Sue Bennett (wearing helmet) and Randall Raymond (far left).</em></figcaption></figure></li><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="458" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-56.jpg" alt="" data-id="10678" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-56.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/11/01/the-spring-2000-knob-creek-belt-fed-competition/004-56-3/#main" class="wp-image-10678" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-56.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-56-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/004-56-600x393.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Bob and Randall display their award for “Best Appearing Crew” presented by the American Class Three Association.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p>The scenario for this event was to have a crew (3-person max limit) from the starting line (about 20 feet from the bunker) have their ammo, gun and mount separated. At the signal from the range officer the crew would enter the “bunker” area, set up the mount, gun, load the ammo and begin firing. A 10 minute time limit was imposed.<br><br>The targets were of 18 different colored helium filled balloons set up in 3 separate sections of 6 balloons per section with 2-3 feet of sting tied to a base. If a shooter cut the balloon string it was a “lost” target. The amazing part was that most competitors completed the course. Have any of you ever tried to hit a balloon at 100 yards especially when the balloon is bobbing up and down and waving side to side due to the wind. Let me tell you that it was a very breezy day and the competitors had to really work. I especially commend the tripod shooters. The gunner had to work the T&amp;E constantly. One amazing thing that was observed by this writer and other spectators, during an engagement of fire a balloon would jump to the side caused by a near miss or shock wave of the bullet. Thus making the target even more difficult to hit.<br><br>Tony set up a separate class for the bipods. The bipods had a very big advantage due to the maneuverability of the weapons. The resulting scores display the big difference in set up time as well.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-3 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="458" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-50.jpg" alt="" data-id="10679" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-50.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/11/01/the-spring-2000-knob-creek-belt-fed-competition/005-50-2/#main" class="wp-image-10679" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-50.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-50-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/005-50-600x393.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Joe Carrere and Paul Winters complete in the Bipod Class.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p>A separate and special plaque award also went to the most authentic appearing gun crew of the competition. With only one entry, the most authentic appearing crew, the Russian Red Army, went to Bob Raymond (Gunner), Randall Raymond and Sue Bennett. This crew did it right. With an M1910 Russian Maxim and a shouldered PPS41, dressed in the proper period of military garb it set the stage for a very colorful event.<br><br>This writer believes this new belt fed competition will be an ongoing event and as the word gets out more entries for the most authentic appearing crew will materialize. With the 1919MG one could be wearing WWII, Korean or Vietnam period uniforms.<br><br>All in all the competition was a great success and fun was had by all. Looking forward to attending the next belt fed competition this fall shoot. Any one who would like to attend this event can contact Tony Gooch AKA mguntony@yahoo.com</p>



<figure class="wp-block-gallery columns-1 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-4 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><ul class="blocks-gallery-grid"><li class="blocks-gallery-item"><figure><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="700" height="458" src="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-35.jpg" alt="" data-id="10681" data-full-url="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-35.jpg" data-link="https://smallarmsreview.com/index.php/2000/11/01/the-spring-2000-knob-creek-belt-fed-competition/006-35-2/#main" class="wp-image-10681" srcset="https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-35.jpg 700w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-35-300x196.jpg 300w, https://smallarmsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/006-35-600x393.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" /><figcaption class="blocks-gallery-item__caption"><em>Bill Owenby, Malcome Davis and the BIG Spotter with his head exposed to the enemy is Matt (Mongo) Bright.</em></figcaption></figure></li></ul></figure>



<p><strong>TRIPOD CLASS RESULTS:</strong><br><br>83.1 Seconds, Gun &#8211; 1919A4<br>Team: 2 man crew<br>Keith New &#8211; Missouri<br>Steve Reece &#8211; Missouri<br><br>193.4 Seconds, Gun &#8211; 1919A4<br>Team: 3 man crew<br>Joe Carrere &#8211; Tenn.<br>Bill Ownbey &#8211; Tenn.<br>Paul Winters &#8211; Ky.<br><br>194.5 Seconds, Gun &#8211; 1919A4<br>Team: 3 man crew<br>Bill Ownbey &#8211; Tenn.<br>Malcome Davis &#8211; Alabama<br>Matt (Mongo) Bright &#8211; N.C.<br><br>233.1 Seconds, Gun &#8211; 1910 Russian Maxim<br>Team: 3 man crew<br>Bob Raymond &#8211; Tenn.<br>Randell Raymond &#8211; Tenn.<br>Sue Bennett &#8211; Louisiana<br><br>666.4 Seconds, Gun &#8211; 1919A4<br>Team: 3 man crew<br>Mike Bergmann &#8211; Ohio<br>Drew Kretzschmar &#8211; Ohio<br>Ed Beyer &#8211; Ohio<br><br>No score, Gun Malfunction, 1919A4<br>Team: 2 man crew<br>Tim Hakenwrth &#8211; Missouri<br>Mike Klos &#8211; Missouri<br><br><strong>BIPOD CLASS RESULTS<br><br></strong>58.82 Seconds, Gun &#8211; Stoner (.223)<br>Team: Single man team<br>Mike Homberger &#8211; Illinois<br><br>117.9 Seconds, Gun &#8211; MG42<br>Team: Single man team<br>Dave Wright &#8211; Illinois<br><br>165.2 Seconds, Gun &#8211; 1919A6<br>Team: Two man crew<br>Joe Carrere &#8211; Tenn<br>Paul Winters &#8211; Ky.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table aligncenter is-style-stripes"><table><tbody><tr><td class="has-text-align-center" data-align="center"><em>This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V4N2 (November 2000)</em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
