Small Arms Review
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
No Result
View All Result
Small Arms Review
No Result
View All Result
Home Ammunition

.22 Long Rifle Conversion for the Black Rifle: Part 2

by SAR Staff
December 1, 2014
in Ammunition, Articles, Articles by Issue, Guns & Parts, Search by Issue, V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014), Volume 18
.22 Long Rifle Conversion for the Black Rifle: Part 2

Core15 TAC III .22 Long Rifle with 15 inch rail. The upper receiver was put on an Aero Precision lower receiver group. The EOTech holographic sight used for testing accuracy at 25 yards.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Christopher R. Bartocci

Without a doubt, the .22 Long Rifle caliber ammunition is the most popular in the industry. Rifles and handguns are made in every configuration possible making it a universal caliber. For the occasional plinker there is a gun and ammo combination and for the competitive shooter there is a rifle and ammunition combination as well. Hunters love the caliber for small game. All of the major U.S. ammunition manufacturers make multiple loads in this popular caliber. Ammunition is broken down into 4 categories for the most part. First is subsonic, which is normally 1,050 fps or less. This is good for use with suppressors as well as when noise is desired to be reduced. The second is standard velocity, which is normally around 1,150 fps. This is often target and match ammunition. The third is high velocity, which is usually around 1,280 fps. This is often for target and hunting ammunition. Also, this is preferred in semiautomatic firearms to reliably cycle the action. The fourth is hyper velocity, which is around 1,500 fps. This is normally a hunting load. Projectiles for the .22 Long Rifle are basically lead round nose or hollow point. Often they will be copper plated to keep the bore from leading. Some are truncated cone shaped such as the Remington Viper and Yellow Jacket. These truncated cone shaped projectiles often encounter feeding problems in semiautomatic firearms. There are specialty bullets as well is various subsonic loads.

For instance, Federal Cartridge Company offers standard (Champion), subsonic (American Eagle), match (Gold Medal) and high velocity (Champion and Game Shok) hunting rounds. Remington offers a wide range of loads. In standard velocity they offer a .22 Target Load. In high velocity they offer the Cyclone, Thunderbolt and Game Load. In hyper velocity they offer the Viper and Yellow Jacket. CCI offer one of the largest selections of loads. In subsonic they offer the Subsonic HP and Quiet .22. CCI offers Standard Velocity with the STR VEL, Green Tag Match, Pistol Match and Select. High velocity offerings include SGB, Mini-Mag and AR Tactical. CCI offers hyper velocity rounds in the Stinger, Velocitor and SRG. Winchester offers a significant number of options as well with one in particular that is pertinent to this article. It is called their M22 load which is a 40 grain Black Copper Plated round nose projectile fired at 1,255 fps. This was specifically designed to burn cleaner in AR-type .22 Long Rifle rifles.

Left to right: The original U.S. Government M261 conversion kit used by the U.S. military from the 1970s until the adoption of the M16A2. The second is the WMD “Little Beast.” This is a NiB-X coated conversion kit designed by Jonathan Arthur Ciener. It is an Atchisson-style drop in carrier. This particular conversion bolt is sold by CMMG and Stag Arms. The conversion bolt Colt sold in the early 1990s was similar with a modification – the addition of a spring loaded plunger to the rear of the bolt. The third is the Tactical Solutions bolt. Notice the unique buffer on the rear of the action spring. The fourth is a modified Atchisson-style with the feed ramp on the end of the bolt instead of the barrel. This style bolt has been used by CMMG, Spikes Tactical and Core15. The fifth is the Chiappa bolt, which is similar in design to the Tactical Solution. There is a spacer added to seal the ejection port and not allow dirt to enter. The sixth is the DPMS bolt – very simple and robust. The mass in the rear assists in the forward movement of the bolt.

Black Dog Machine, LLC Magazines

In 2005, Black Dog Machine of Nampa, ID introduced their first polymer AR-22 Long Rifle magazine. The AR 15/22 magazine referred to as “the skinny body” magazine is now referred to the “Gen 1.” Black Dog Machine began their development with polymer because they wanted to supply the market with the first molded magazine for a reasonable price right when the 1994 Assault Weapon ban sunset. Black Dog Machine is without a doubt the leading manufacture of .22 Long Rifle magazines for the AR platform in the industry. They manufacture magazines for 14 different OEM’s. In fact, all but two of the conversion upper receivers tested for this article came shipped with Black Dog Machine magazines.

In 2011, the Black Dog Machine magazines got an upgrade to cast stainless steel feed lips. This is a big upgrade to this sensitive part of the magazine and was released on all of the XF line of magazines. The follower on the Black Dog Machine magazines holds the bolt open after the last shot. It does not actuate a bolt catch; as soon as the magazine is removed from the rifle the bolt slams forward. This is very important in the life of the firing pin. If the chamber is empty and the hammer falls, the firing pin will peen around the chamber on the face of the barrel – not only damaging the firing pin but the peening of the chamber can be enough to stop a round from chambering. Locking back on the follower prevents this damage from taking place.

Black Dog offers magazine capacity of 10, 25, 32 and 50 rounds. Straight stick magazines are offered in 10-round capacity in both black and translucent polymer. The 25-round magazines are curved like the standard 30-round 5.56mm magazine and are also offered in black and translucent polymer. The most interesting magazine tested was their billet black 25-round magazine. This was designed to mimic the exact weight of a full 30-round 5.56mm magazine at 1 pound. When this was placed in the Tac Sol and DPMS upper equipped rifles the weight/balance was identical to that of a standard M4 carbine. Also offered is a polymer 32-round magazine. The follower is thumb assisted to aid in loading. This is a very long magazine. Of the three lowers tested, both of the sample magazines fit in the well quite snug. When tested they did not malfunction but due to the extreme size the standard 25-round magazines were far more appropriate for shooting off a bench as they all dropped free from any mag well they were inserted into. The other magazine tested was Black Dog Machines’ 50-round drum magazine. Many attempts have been made to make 50 and 100-round capacity magazines in .22 Long Rifle. Most were a complete failure. This one, however, is quite well thought out and executed. The magazine is convertible by simply getting a conversion kit and changing out the feeding tower so it can be used in either a Ruger 10/22 or AR-type lower receiver. The magazine has ridges on the rear of the back of the drum to aid in loading. Slightly pushing down on the rear allows the follower to drop slightly so a round may be easily inserted. This magazine was loaded five times with CCI Mini-Mag and Stinger ammunition out of the Tac Sol upper and the Chiappa upper and there were no malfunctions at all. This magazine performed well with the high and hyper velocity ammunition. All of the mentioned magazines were tested throughout the research for this article. No malfunctions were encountered due to these magazines at all. All of the malfunctions encountered were ammunition related (low power standard ammo). The quality is excellent which is why 14 OEM’s trust these magazines to go out with their product.

Chiappa .22 LR upper conversion kit mounted on a ATI OMNI Hybrid lower receiver group. The group at 25 yards was just under an inch with ATI Scorpion .22 LR high velocity ammunition.

Spikes Tactical .22 ST-22 Upper Receiver Conversion

In 2008, Spikes Tactical introduced their .22 Long Rifle conversion kit as well as complete rifles called the ST-22. These are amongst the highest quality of those tested. It should be noted that as of this time, Spikes Tactical has discontinued production of the ST-22 series due to the high demand of their 5.56mm and .300 Blackout rifles. There is a good chance once things calm down with the demand for the larger caliber, Spikes Tactical will bring back the ST-22 line. Spikes Tactical has offered nearly 50 variations of their ST-22. That is every combination of handguard, lower receiver, gas block, barrel length and muzzle device you can think of including some different markings on the receivers.

The receiver sent for test and evaluation came with a Mil-Spec 7075-T6 aircraft aluminum upper receiver. It has a forward assist although it serves no purpose other than cosmetic. The receiver also has the fired cartridge case deflector and ejection port dust cover. The top of the rail has a regular Mil-Std-1913 rail along with a beautifully engraved spider on the rear by the charging handle.

The barrels used by Spikes Tactical are both Lothar Walther and Green Mountain, both 1:16 twist. The barrel on the test and evaluation unit was a Lothar Walther. The Lothar also had a slightly tighter chamber and bore that improved accuracy and reliability due to the increased back pressure. The barrel lengths offered go from 5.5 up to 16 inches. The barrel on the T&E unit was 16 inches in length. The muzzle device attached was the Spikes Tactical Dyna Comp. The Dyna Comp is designed to reduce recoil impulse and muzzle climb to provide faster follow-up shots. This is accomplished by balancing the direction of the blast along the vertical and perpendicular planes of the muzzle to lower muzzle rise, while the end of the devise restricts forward energy to reduce parallel recoil. The ports are ball dimpled for smoother expansion of gases and rapid heat dissipation. The compensator is Melonite treated.

Black Dog Machine, LLC was kind enough to provide samples of their entire line of magazines for testing the receivers for this project. As test and evaluation receivers started coming in, it was found that most of the sample receivers came with Black Dog Machine magazines. So Black Dog Machine is a major OEM supplier. Magazines are made in 10, 15, 25, 26, 30 and 50-round capacities in both black and translucent configurations.

The rail provided on the upper receiver is the Spikes Tactical ST/S3. The rail is 13.2 inches in length with quad Mil-Std 1913 rails. The rail is attached to a proprietary barrel nut that leaves the barrel fully free floated. The rail is manufactured from an extrusion and Type III anodized hardcoat finished. All of the rails are scalloped for operator’s comfort. There are four QD sockets as well. The rail is very well made and very durable.

The bolt is a modified Atchisson design. This design has an interchangeable front that is held in place by the receiver frame. This particular one is equipped with a barrel collar assembly that contains the feed ramp; the barrel end slides into the barrel collar assembly. The bolt group is entirely finished in NP3 Nickel Teflon.

The upper receiver was placed on the Aero Precision lower receiver. All magazines used were Black Dog Machine 10, 25 and 50- round magazines. The upper was tested with CCI Mini-Mag, Remington Golden Bullet, Scorpion, Federal Match and CCI Stinger. The rifle would not reliably cycle with the Federal Match and justly so due to it being standard velocity but this was by far the most accurate load. All other ammunition fed reliably and accurately. More than 200 rounds were fired through this upper with only a few malfunctions due to ammunition. Every manufacturer of these conversion units recommended high velocity or hyper velocity ammunition to make the rifle fire reliably.

Although the ST-22 went out of production in January of 2013, there are still many upper conversions as well as complete rifles out there. This is a high quality conversion that has had a lot of time and thought gone into it to make it that much better than some of its competitors. Hopefully at some point Spikes Tactical will put them back into production. Tom Miller at Spikes Tactical told this author that they have everything they need to go right back into production when the time comes.

Close views of the features offered by Spikes Tactical on their .22LR conversion upper. Notice the marked receiver stating the receiver is ST-22, .22LR caliber. Shown top right is a close view of the Spikes Tactical Dynacomp. The bolt is similar to that of the CMMG where the feeding mechanism is contained in the end of the bolt group instead of the feed ramps being attached to the end ofthe barrel. Also notice the bolt group is nickel boron coated.

Core15 .22 Long Rifle Conversion

Core15 is one of the newest manufacturers in the AR-business out of Ocala, Florida. When they opened their doors they hired Israel Anzaldua, formerly a Bushmaster senior executive, to assist them in getting going. They have very quickly gained a reputation of being one of the higher tier AR manufacturers. They make rifles in 5.56mm, 7.62x51mm and .300 Blackout. They manufacture .22 Long Rifle conversion uppers only, not complete rifles. Core15 introduced their .22 Long Rifle line up in December of 2011. They offer 5 different variations: M4, MOE, TAC, TAC III with 12 inch rail and the TAC III with a 15 inch rail.

The upper receiver received for test and evaluation was the TAC III with the 15 inch rail. The MSRP on this particular upper is $629.99. The upper receiver is a standard 7075 T6 aircraft grade aluminum upper receiver with a forward assist (looks only), fired cartridge case deflector and ejection port dust cover. The charging handle is manufactured from a solid piece of 6061-T6 billet aluminum allowing it to be held to extremely consistent tolerances and maintain exceptional level of strength. The charging handle is equipped with the Core15 V2 tactical latch.

The 16 inch barrel is nitride coated and equipped with a standard A2-type compensator. Core15 currently out-sources their .22 Long Rifle barrels to Green Mountain but are in the process of manufacturing their own barrels. As of this writing, Core15 is manufacturing their own 5.56mm barrels. The barrel on the test and evaluation unit is manufactured from 4140 steel and has a twist rate of 1 turn 16 inches. The handguard provided on the test and evaluation unit is the Midwest Industries Gen 2 SS series handguard. The handguard has a 1.5 inch outer diameter and is very light. The rail is manufactured from 6061 aluminum and uses a proprietary barrel nut that must be installed by a gunsmith. The rail is set up so that there are removable rail segments that allow the user to only put on what is needed and not to worry about the others being damaged. The provided upper was equipped with two of the 2-inch rail panels mounted at 3 and 9 o’clock on the front of the handguard.

DPMS upper

The bolt is a modified Atchisson design. This design has an interchangeable front that is held in place by the receiver frame. The bolt group is made from 4143 stainless steel. This particular one is equipped with a barrel collar assembly that contains the feed ramp. The barrel end slides into the barrel collar assembly. The bolt group is nickel boron coated.

The upper was tested solely with Black Dog Machine magazines and placed on the Aero Precision lower receiver. The upper was tested with CCI MiniMag, Remington Golden Bullet, Scorpion, Federal Match and CCI Stinger. Approximately 200 rounds were fired. Like all the rifles before it and after it, the upper would not cycle with the Federal Match ammo due to it being standard velocity. However, the best groups were shot with this ammo. Other than that, the rifle cycled reliability with all the ammunition it was fed. Core15 recommends CCI and Winchester ammunition and stated their uppers have zero issues with CCI Stingers.

Core15 offers 5 variations that cover any customer. They are very high quality but expensive. You do get what you pay for. Their most popular upper is their TAC III with the 12 or 15-inch Midwest Industries rail system. Core15 feels that it is the narrowest rail in the industry, providing comfort, lightweight and modularity.

Bolt used in the DPMS .22 LR upper conversion. Note the two piece bolt group linked by the action spring. On the bottom, the DPMS is the only one of the receivers that had the ejector bolted into the receiver.

DPMS

DPMS has been around for quite some time and they were probably one of the earliest to come out with a .22 Long Rifle conversion kit. DPMS introduced their line of conversion upper receivers in the fall of 2011. They offer two models: The AP4 and the Bull Barrel. The Bull barrel is a very heavy 16 inch barrel with a free float tubular handguard. The AP4 was sent for test and evaluation.

The upper receiver is rather unique compared to all the others tested. The receiver is manufactured from 7075 T6 aircraft aluminum and is machined to be dedicated solely to .22 Long Rifle caliber. First, the ejection opening is half the length of the standard M16/M4. Second, there is no cam slot machined into the receiver. Thirdly, the inside of the receiver is a different shape to accept a rectangular shaped bolt group. The forward assist is permanently attached into the receiver and stationary. You have the appearance but it is non-functioning. The rail is the typical Mil-Std 1913. Another totally unique feature of this upper receiver is that the ejector is screwed into the left side of the inside of the receiver.

The barrel on the AP4 tested is 16 inches in length with a 1 turn in 16 inch twist. The barrel is manufactured by DPMS and is manufactured from 4140 steel and Teflon coated. The barrel has the step-cut for mounting the M203 (not that you would) as well as a standard A2-style compensator. The front sight base was pinned to the barrel and has a bayonet lug. Standard large M4-type handguards came on it with a delta ring.

The charging handle is proprietary on this design. There is a raised portion of material on top of the bolt that rides in a track in the charging handle. The bolt is also very unique compared to the rest of the uppers tested. It consists of two pieces and the recoil/action spring. The front part of the bolt is not so out of the ordinary other than the shape. The piece of metal on the rear is out of the norm. It is a rather large chunk of metal. It appears the reason for the large chunk of metal is not just to take up space but, due to the mass, will assist on more energy to drive the bolt forward. Try to picture bolt carrier bounce on a M4 but reverse the direction of the bounce. When two pieces of metal collide and one is heavier than the other, there will be rebound due to the physics of the thing. This would appear to be the logic behind it – or it could just be a sheer benefit of the design.

The upper receiver was placed on the Aero Precision lower receiver. Only Black Dog Machine magazines were used. The upper was tested with CCI MiniMag, Remington Golden Bullet, Scorpion, Federal Match and CCI Stinger. This was the only rifle to cycle the standard velocity Federal match ammunition. The upper fired all 25 without a hitch. More than 200 rounds of the mentioned ammunition were fired without a single malfunction. The rifle grouped very well, although the range was 15 yards.

The DPMS is certainly an excellent option for one looking for a .22 Long Rifle conversion kit. The AP4 is a great all-round upper. The bull barrel version is great for a competitor or for one who likes to put every bullet in the same hole. The quality of this upper receiver is excellent and with an MSRP $399 it is hard to beat.

The Chiappa upper receivers were mounted on an American Tactical Imports OMNI Hybrid polymer lower receiver for testing. Note the Leupold optic that was used for accuracy testing.

Chiappa M4-22, .22 Long Rifle Conversion

Chiappa has been known mostly for blank firing weapons as well as reproduction firearms from way back – opening their doors in Italy in 1958. They opened a facility in Dayton, Ohio in 2007 to expand their North American market. Chiappa introduced both their M4-22 upper receiver conversion and their M4-22 complete rifle. They offer three different upper receivers. First is the M4-22 (CF500-059) upper, which is a 16 inch government profile barrel. This upper has standard M4-type handguards and a polymer upper receiver. The receiver has a forward assist (nonfunctional), fired cartridge case deflector and ejection port cover. The average selling price is around $350. This upper comes with a 28-round magazine. The next is the M4-22 Gen II Pro (CF500-097), which differs from the standard by having a 7.8 inch free floating handguard. The third variation is the M4-22 Gen II Pro (CF500-095), which differs from the previous by having an 11.8 inch free floating barrel.

There were three different uppers tested during this research. All were the same but with different handguards. The barrel was equipped with a standard A2-style compensator. The bolt is a modified Atchisson. The feed ramp is on the end of the barrel itself. There is a spacer directly behind the bolt that seals up the ejection port protecting the inside of the rifle from debris. Both black and chrome plated carriers were seen.

The upper receiver was placed on an American Tactical Gen 2 Hybrid polymer lower receiver. This was the most finicky of the lot. Quite accurate at 25 yards with 28 rounds in just over an inch with Scorpion ammunition but the uppers experienced some failures for the bolt to fully close. This was pretty much the only type of malfunction. Probably 5% of the rounds failed to cycle properly. If the round fired, it extracted, ejected and fed. At this point is where the hiccups began. This rifle did not like Stingers; the longer case was a contributor to failure of the bolt to close. The best performance came with Scorpion and CCI MiniMag ammunition. The magazine is proprietary to Chiappa but the Black Dog Machine magazines worked perfect as well. The Chiappa magazine was a little more difficult to load and you had to get the technique down. If the back end of the rim of the cartridge did not all stagger, that would interrupt the shot column from rising and cause a stoppage. All three of the uppers tested experienced this failure for the bolt to close. One of the uppers only had it happen a few times. This could have well been a chamber issue. The chamber and bore were scrubbed and clean to insure there was no lead fouling.

The Chiappa bolt group (top). Notice this is black; the other two receivers had a chrome plated finish. The back of the bolt has a spacer to keep dirt from entering the receiver through the ejection port. The bottom shows both loaded and unloaded Chiappa polymer magazines.

The Chiappa receiver has the lowest MSRP and is not a bad unit to start off with. Chiappa has excellent customer service and were very helpful. Chiappa has some OEM contracts for these upper receivers. Finding the right ammunition is always the key to reliability. During testing, due to the sheer number of uppers tested there just was not enough time or ammunition to do any real ammo compatibility testing. Given more time and ammo this author is sure I could have found a winning ammo/rifle combination.

There are many options out there for the purchaser of a .22 conversion kit. Certainly some are better than others. Based on this testing, price is not always a determining factor for quality. Mostly yes, but not always. The DPMS is the perfect example, with a low $399 MSRP it outperformed some of the ones in the $600 range. Then again the top performer has an MSRP of $625. The testing showed clearly that the .22 Long Rifle caliber is just not as reliable as a center fire cartridge. When the rifle malfunctioned it took some time to determine if the problem was with the rifle or the ammunition. Mostly, it came down to the inconsistencies of the ammunition. Good magazines make a difference and for best reliability result leave a standard trigger group with a rounded hammer. During testing two match grade triggers were tested with the notched hammer and the rifle would malfunction. Also, you do not want to change out your hammer spring for a lighter one. This may cause issues with detonation on the hard rim of the cartridge case. Stay with high velocity ammunition. The best result from this testing showed CCI MiniMag, CCI Stinger, Scorpion, Federal American Eagle, Winchester M-22 and Remington Thunder Bolt. Every rifle can be a little different; you may find a round that works better in your particular rifle.

This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V18N6 (December 2014)
Tags: .22 Long Rifle Conversion for the Black Rifle: Part 22014Christopher R. BartocciDECEMBER 2014V18N6
Previous Post

The Colt IAR6940 (Infantry Automatic Rifle)

Next Post

Supreme Court Affirms Curb on Buying Guns for Third Party

Next Post
Industry News: November 1999

Supreme Court Affirms Curb on Buying Guns for Third Party

TRENDING STORIES

  • VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • EAST GERMAN WIEGER STG RIFLE

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Complete Guide To Colt M-16 Models: Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Forgotten M16A1 Rifle Manufacturers: GM/Hydra-Matic and Harrington & Richardson – Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Second Generation AR57: Drop-in 5.7 Upper For Your AR

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

RECENT POSTS

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

June 27, 2024
The Importance of Offhand Shooting

The Importance of Offhand Shooting

June 25, 2024
BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

June 20, 2024
True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

June 18, 2024
Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

June 6, 2024

QUICK LINKS

  • About Chipotle Publishing
  • About Small Arms Review
  • Advertise with Us
  • Write for Us

CONTACT DETAILS

  • Phone: +1 (702) 565-0746
  • E-mail: office@smallarmsreview.com
  • Web: www.chipotlepublishing.com
  • Chipotle Publishing, LLC 631 N. Stephanie St., No. 282, Henderson, NV 89014
Small Arms Review

FOLLOW US

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
      • Volume 12
      • Volume 13
      • Volume 14
      • Volume 15
      • Volume 16
      • Volume 17
      • Volume 18
      • Volume 19
      • Volume 20
      • Volume 21
      • Volume 22
      • Volume 23
      • Volume 24
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Redirecting to External Website

You are leaving the Small Arms Review website and will be redirected to an external link in a 5 Seconds.
VISIT NOW!