Small Arms Review
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal


No Result
View All Result
Small Arms Review


No Result
View All Result
Home Ammunition

7.62MM M1 18 LONG RANGE EVOLUTION OF THE ULTIMATE SNIPER ROUND

by SAR Staff
November 1, 2003
in Ammunition, Articles, Articles by Issue, Search by Issue, V7N2 (Nov 2003), Volume 7
7.62MM M1 18 LONG RANGE EVOLUTION OF THE ULTIMATE SNIPER ROUND
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

by Jim Frigiola

During World War II there was no special ammunition issued for use by snipers. Since the US issue sniper rifles of the period were nothing more than a service rifle fitted with a telescope, the sniper in the field was left to his own resourcefulness to select ammunition. In his book Shots Fired in Anger, LtCol John George recounts taking his personal Pre-War Winchester Model 70 into combat with the Japanese in the islands of the Pacific. LtCol George states that he selected a good shooting lot of .30 caliber M2 Ball ammunition made at the Denver Ordnance Plant. It is not likely that this ammunition was capable of producing groups as small as 2 minutes of angle (MOA) in his rifle.

Snipers by necessity pay particularly close attention to the quality and care of their rifle equipment and ammunition. For the most part only the most accurate match-grade ammunition is selected and fired through the sniper’s weapon. The most accurate standard issue ammo is, of course, match ammunition intended for competitive marksmanship use. The demands of wartime logistics, however, are characterized by large volumes of ordinary service-grade product, where abundance takes priority over quality. While very good Caliber .30 M1 National Match Ball ammunition was made during the 1930s, the US Military made no match-grade ammo during the 1940s. Standard issue match ammo did not appear again until the late 1950s when the Caliber .30 M72 Match round was standardized about the same time that 7.62x51mm NATO rifles were adopted.

Prototype T275 Match Ammunition – The first 7.62mm NATO Match cartridges appeared in 1956 as the Frankford Arsenal experimental T275 International Match round. Shown here is the front and back of a box from an experimental lot. International Match competition being fired only at 300 meters the velocity of these loads was 2250 to 2300 ft/sec. The T275 round went through design changes up to T275E5. The colorful shield on this label is the same as used on match cartridges loaded back in the 1930’s.

The earliest work to develop a 7.62x51mm NATO match round started in the mid 1950s at Frankford Arsenal. The first version was designated T275 and was an International Match load. No special bullet tailored to the 12-inch twist rate of 7.62mm barrels was used in the T275 cartridge. Instead it was loaded with the same 173-grain bullet as the Cal .30 M72 Match round. This bullet was essentially the 1926-vintage caliber .30 M1 Ball bullet without the knurled cannelure. Accuracy performance specifications for the T275 called for a maximum mean radius of 3.5 inches at 600 yards when fired from a Mann barrel in a machine rest.

The T275 cartridge went through several design and load development iterations based on feedback from competitive rifle marksmen from AMU, Ft Benning, Georgia. The final version, the T275E4, was re-designated XM118 as work continued at Frankford Arsenal. Standardization of this round as the M118 Match cartridge occurred in the early 1960s and production was transferred to the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant in Independence, MO. During the 1960s and 1970s, the round became more accurate as Lake City was able to refine the manufacturing process and product performance. The accuracy specifications did not change over time but average lots of M118 Match showed 600-yard accuracy with mean radii around 2.4 inches. A few very exceptional lots were below 2.0 inches.

Early Production XM118 Match – Extra care and attention went into loading the earliest production lots of XM118 Match ammo at Frankford Arsenal. The high quality is evident by the match eagle graphics prepared especially for Match ammunition. This box indicating Lot #6 dates from 1964.

In the mid 1960s LtCol David Parsons was commanding officer at Lake City Army Ammunition Plant. Parsons was himself a distinguished rifleman and handloader. Under his leadership and with his personal attention, some of the most accurate M72 and M118 Match ammunition was produced. The cartridges were packed in clean white boxes bearing the colorful Match Eagle on the backside. When a rifleman broke open one of these distinctive white boxes he knew he had the best quality cartridges made in America. During this period Lake City made up special chrome-plated .30 caliber and 7.62x51mm dummy match cartridges, which were issued as souvenirs – one to each shooter competing in the National Matches at Camp Perry. These handsome chrome dummies are now prized as collector’s items.

The need for precision high-accuracy ammunition was recognized in the commercial sector as well. Federal Cartridge Company, working closely with Marines at Quantico, developed their famous “308M” load using superbly accurate Sierra 168-grain International Match bullets. These loads became popular with law enforcement SWAT Teams as well as service rifle shooters.

Early XM118 Match Ammunition – Here is an example of the earliest known XM118 Match box label. This round was the T275E4 redesignated under a new military nomenclature system. This box label is blue ink mimeographed and dated 1962.

Interservice and National Match rifle competition being what it was at the time drove Army and Marine Corps shooters to seek even more accurate loads. By 1980 it was known that the Sierra 168-grain International Match bullet was significantly more accurate in M14 Match rifles and gave top shooters a real competitive edge when firing the National Match Course at 200, 300 and 600 yards. Commercially loaded Federal Cartridge Co ammunition was highly prized but often not available to military riflemen. Field users developed the practice of removing the 173-grain bullet from Lake City M118 ammo and replacing it with the 168-grain Sierra. Such ammunition, while not official issue, was authorized for competition at Camp Perry and was known as “Mexican Match” ammo.

Army ammunition product managers eventually heard the wake up call. In 1981 Lake City began loading a new 7.62x51mm Match cartridge using the 168-grain Sierra bullet. This round was first designated XM852 and was soon standardized as the M852. It quickly replaced the M118 as the preferred match round for competitive marksmanship use. Since the Sierra 168-grain projectile was labeled as a hollow point boattail (HPBT) bullet it was prohibited for service use by snipers against personnel. Throughout its production history cartons containing M852 ammunition were conspicuously marked “Not For Combat Use”. So cautious about this sensitive legal issue were the Army product managers that they also required that cases used for M852 rounds be further identified by a knurled cannelure near the extractor groove. This feature allowed fired cases to be identified as having launched an HPBT bullet. As could be expected, the case body knurl on M852 brass was very unpopular with handloaders because of a real or perceived reduction of case life when subjected to repeated cycles of resizing, reloading and firing.

Match Box Graphics -The distinctive graphics used for Match ammunition boxes was seen to degrade over the years, as did the accuracy performance. One would guess that these changes were due to a desire to seek cost savings in manufacturing operations. Shown here is a Frankford Arsenal label at the top. The Lake City box in the center shows a little less ornate eagle. Eventually, as seen on the bottom box, the eagle disappeared all together from boxes of M852 ammunition.

M852 Match ammunition did replace M118 Match ammunition in the field as the standard round for marksmanship competition. However, military snipers, being required to use only FMJ ammunition were left with only the less accurate M118 for training and combat. Production of M118 at Lake City did continue for snipers but the cartridge was downgraded by a name change from M118 MATCH to M118 Special Ball. No longer packed in clean white Match cartons bearing the distinctive Match Eagle the Special Ball loads were issued in plain brown paper boxes. At the same time the prestigious MATCH notation was deleted from the headstamp of M118 Special Ball ammunition. The new cases looked the same as M80 Ball cases and even had crimped in primers. Further, to the chagrin of accuracy conscious riflemen, performance of M118 Special ball ammo deteriorated noticeably. Cartridge accuracy specifications remained unchanged from the original 3.5-inch mean radius at 600 yards, but newly loaded rounds were issued which barely met this loose requirement. Gone were the days when “white box” M118 Match ammo was made with pride and every lot far exceeded the accuracy requirement by a significant margin.

White Box M118 Match Ammunition – Some of the most accurate 7.62 Match ammunition came in these distinctive white boxes. Shown here are examples of Lake City production lots from the 1960’s, 1970’s and early 1980’s. These white boxes became highly coveted by accuracy conscious riflemen after they were superseded by brown box M118 Special Ball ammo.

An interesting thing happened in 1990 when US Army lawyer Hays Parks, a technically astute former Marine, conducted a legal review on behalf of the Judge Advocate General of the Army. Parks looked at the issue of whether combat use of Sierra HPBT match bullets violated any international agreements pertaining to weapons of war. Given the fact that the most accurate bullets do have an open tip, it was determined that these bullets were not true hollow points, per se, and that they were not designed to mushroom upon impact or cause undue suffering. Indeed, testing showed that Sierra match bullets do not behave at all like hollow point expanding bullets when fired into ballistic gelatin. From a technical standpoint it was clear that the open tip of such bullets was a design feature selected for aerodynamic reasons and served the purpose of accuracy improvement rather than having any excessive wounding effect. The Army JAG issued a lengthy legal memorandum, which states that the military use of open tip bullets does not violate any treaty obligations of the United States. The Parks memorandum was endorsed by the military services and legally authorized such ammunition as the M852 Match cartridge for combat use. Nevertheless, the ammunition usage policy changes allowed by this important document were never fully realized nor enacted in general practice. Cartons in which M852 cartridges were packed continued to bear the “Not For Combat Use” warning.

173 gr Special Ball Ammo – The M118 Match round was downgraded and redesignated as Special Ball in 1983 after the adoption of M852 Match ammunition as the preferred round for marksmanship competion. M118 Special Ball was packed in brown boxes when it first appeared. But even these brown boxes seem to have suffered cost cutting measures. Examples from the final production lots don’t even have a border around the label. Nor do they indicate the source of manufacture.

The Army and Marine Corps took different paths in the development of sniper rifles. From the 1960s the standard Army issue sniper rifle was the M21. This was essentially a match-grade M14 rifle with a suitable scope mounted. It gave respectable accuracy when newly assembled but was difficult to maintain. The M21 was eventually replaced by the more dependable M24 rifle. M24s were of commercial design using a Remington Model 700 long action.

The Marine Corps however, always preferred bolt-action rifles. In the 1960s in Vietnam Marine snipers used Winchester Model 70 rifles. These were eventually replaced by the more refined Marine Corps unique M40 sniper rifle built by Remington as a special order short action Model 700 rifle. It was fitted with a Redfield 3X9 variable-power scope. Currently fielded M40A1 rifles are very rugged, highly accurate and are equipped with an excellent 10X Unertl scope. The M40A1’s are soon to be replaced by the M40A3, a new generation rifle having more bells and whistles.

The Excellent M852 Match Ammunition – The XM852 Match round using the highly accurate 168 gr Sierra Matchking bullet first appeared in 1981. These excellent rounds were the preferred choice of expert and master class riflemen for a decade or more. As can be seen from these sequential box labels M852 ammo always came with a restrictive warning that these were “Not For Combat Use”. Military snipers were left with only M118 Special Ball for business use.

The special reticule of the Marine Corps Unertl scope allowed snipers to achieve hits at ranges out to 800 and 1000 yards. However, these optical aids were developed based on the known ballistic trajectory of old M118 “white box” Match ammunition. The new M118 Special Ball ammo in brown boxes was found to be seriously deficient in shot placement using the Unertl reticule. In addition to being less accurate at short ranges the Special Ball ammo showed an unacceptable mismatch in trajectory at very long range.

The 168-grain Sierra Matchking bullet was originally designed for 300-meter International competition. Indeed, when first introduced this bullet was labeled “International” but is now simply known as a Matchking. M852 ammunition using this bullet does, however, give excellent accuracy out to 600 yards. But at ranges beyond 600 yards the 168-grain bullet begins to falter. At 1,000 yards the remaining velocity drops below subsonic levels and stability becomes poor. The older 173-grain bullet of the M118, although not as accurate, did maintain its flight stability very well beyond 600 yards.

Headstamp of the M118 Long Range Round. LC =Lake City manufacture, 95 = 1995 manufacture date, LR = Long Range designation. Photo by Jeff W. Zimba

While the Army product managers were quite satisfied that the M118 Special Ball was performing within official specifications, the Marine Corps, having made a considerable investment in the Unertl scope, wanted an improved cartridge that would meet their training and operational needs at very long ranges. They decided to seek a solution on their own without support from other services.

A project was started in the mid 1990’s to identify a new bullet suitable for long-range use in 7.62x51mm sniper rifles. Engineers at Lake City and Sierra took a look at the USMC unique requirements and evaluated a number of candidate bullets and other cartridge improvements. An accuracy requirement calling for MOA dispersion measured at 1,000 yards was established. After extensive testing a new 175-grain HPBT bullet having a 9-degree boattail emerged from Sierra. This new Mathking bullet remains supersonic at 1,000 yards and has proved capable of meeting the extraordinary long-range accuracy requirement. This load came to be the M118 Long Range cartridge. The letters LR appear on the headstamp to serve as visual identification. A new logistic code of AA11 was assigned to identify this round as different from earlier M118 ammunition.

Thus, the M118 cartridge has entered a third phase of its production history, having been originally designated MATCH, then Special Ball, and now Long Range. No other small arms cartridge has ever been redesigned and reengineered so often over so many decades. Production of M852 Match ammunition has been discontinued since the new M118 Long Range round is now the preferred ammunition for 7.62x51mm rifle competition. In addition, as further tribute to the success of this USMC initiative, we note that Navy and Army snipers have also adopted it for operational and combat use.

This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V7N2 (November 2003)

Author

  • SAR Staff
    SAR Staff

    View all posts
Tags: 18 LONG RANGE20037.62MM M1Jim FrigiolaNOVEMBER 2003SNIPER ROUNDV7N2
Previous Post

THE CIVILIAN M60 MACHINEGUN OWNERS GUIDE: PART I

Next Post

METALLIC BELT LINKER

Next Post
METALLIC BELT LINKER

METALLIC BELT LINKER

TRENDING STORIES

  • VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Complete Guide To Colt M-16 Models: Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Second Generation AR57: Drop-in 5.7 Upper For Your AR

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Forgotten M16A1 Rifle Manufacturers: GM/Hydra-Matic and Harrington & Richardson – Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The New Light and Handy Ruger American Generation II Ranch Rifle

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

RECENT POSTS

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

June 27, 2024
The Importance of Offhand Shooting

The Importance of Offhand Shooting

June 25, 2024
BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

June 20, 2024
True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

June 18, 2024
Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

June 6, 2024

QUICK LINKS

  • About Chipotle Publishing
  • About Small Arms Review
  • Advertise with Us
  • Write for Us

CONTACT DETAILS

  • Phone: +1 (702) 565-0746
  • E-mail: office@smallarmsreview.com
  • Web: www.chipotlepublishing.com
  • Chipotle Publishing, LLC 631 N. Stephanie St., No. 282, Henderson, NV 89014
Small Arms Review

FOLLOW US

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist



No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
      • Volume 12
      • Volume 13
      • Volume 14
      • Volume 15
      • Volume 16
      • Volume 17
      • Volume 18
      • Volume 19
      • Volume 20
      • Volume 21
      • Volume 22
      • Volume 23
      • Volume 24
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.