Small Arms Review
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • FrankenGun Challenge
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • FrankenGun Challenge
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
No Result
View All Result
Small Arms Review
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles Articles by Issue Volume 16 V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)

ADCOR DEFENSE B.E.A.R.

SAR Staff by SAR Staff
September 11, 2022
in V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012), Articles, Articles by Issue, Guns & Parts, Search by Issue, Volume 16
ADCOR DEFENSE B.E.A.R.
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Christopher R. Bartocci

Group shot of Kelly’s Heroes.

It has been a decade since the war on terror began and from these two wars the infantry equipment was put through the ultimate test, combat in the desert. Around 2004, requirements came out for a new rifle to replace the M4 carbine due to malfunctions in the field. The talcum powder-like sand caused the weapons to malfunction at critical moments. Although there was no official requirement to replace the M4/M16 series weapons from the Army, there was from SOCOM as well as a number of soldiers. Enough so Oklahoma Senator Coburn put pressure on the Army to see if in fact the M4 was the best weapon available to the U.S. soldiers. Due to this pressure the Army conducted Dust Test II where the current M4 carbine was tested against the FN SCAR Light, H&K 416 and the H&K XM8. The test showed the current issue M4 to be the least reliable, by far. The test consisted of 10 each of the rifles and firing 60,000 rounds per model. The end result was the XM8 had 127 stoppages, the FN SCAR Light 226 stoppages, the HK416 233 stoppages and the current issue Colt M4 carbine 882 stoppages. Clearly there is a large gap in stoppages seen between the newer carbines and the standard. The results of this test were questioned by both Colt Defense as well as some in the Army but the results stand. This got congress and the army to initiate two different actions. First was a short term M4 Product Improvement program consisting of three phases. Phase one is procuring 25,000 new M4A1 carbines with heavy barrels, full auto capability and ambidextrous controls. This is to deal with the overheating problems encountered in combat in the desert and the decrease of individual firepower by eliminating the burst setting for fully automatic. Phase II is an open competition for a new and improved bolt carrier group and forward rail. The current OEM of the M4 has not provided this since the rifle’s inception, the only real advancements in the bolt carrier group to increase reliability was a new extractor spring. COTS (Commercial Off The Shelf) manufacturers have developed significant leaps in technology in advancing the bolt carrier group such as the LMT Enhanced bolt carrier group and the Knight’s Armament Company (KAC) E3 system (Enhanced Reliability, durability and maintainability) bolt carrier/barrel extension system. The current KAC M4/M5 RAS is a good system but it is outdated in comparison to many new COTS designs, some of them are from the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) KAC including the URX system. Phase III is an operating system review to see if there is a better more reliable gas system for this weapon platform. This is the major issue. Most of the issues surrounding this debate center on the operating system. Is direct gas impingement as reliable as or less reliable than the standard short and long stroke piston designs.

The selective fire BEAR 10.3 inch carbine. This particular one has a Magpul MOE stock, BUIS and PMag. The rifle is also equipped with a Grip Pod.

To review the systems, the direct gas or gas impingement system uses a gas tube attached to the front sight block to transfer gas from the gas port, into the tube, back into the bolt carrier where the expansion chamber is made up of the back of the bolt and the back of the bolt carrier. As the pressures increase, the bolt carrier moves rearward until the cam pin is rotated in the cam track of the bolt carrier to unlock the bolt and extract and eject the cartridge case. The benefits of this system is the minimum of moving parts, in-line construction decreasing recoil, little affect on the barrel harmonics increasing accuracy over standard piston designs. The disadvantages include carbon deposits being carried and deposited in the bolt carrier group fouling the bolt carrier group. Due to the hot gasses going into the carrier excessive heat builds up in the receivers. Reliability decreased in the carbine systems, failures to extract due to the bolt unlocking and extraction beginning while the cartridge case is still obturated and maintenance being more frequent than other comparable battle rifles. Also cycle rate increases with gas port erosion.

Mike Brownís 1st prototype rifle. Notice the dust wiper, gas plug on a modified front sight base and forward charging handle.

The short stroke tappet piston design is used by most of the major competitors for the new carbine program. There is a gas block attached to the barrel where an operating rod sits whether the end of the rod is the piston or there is a separate piston. Gas tapped from the barrel strikes the piston (operating rod) driving the operating rod rearward striking the face of the bolt carrier (or impact location) driving the bolt carrier to the rear. The operating rod then moves forward by spring tension back into its position in the gas block. The benefits are no heat is transferred back into the receiver, no carbon or debris is blown back into the bolt carrier group causing fouling and the bolt stays significantly cleaner hence will run much longer between cleaning. The negative parts of this system are extra weight, more moving parts, require more gas pressure to operate, carrier tilt/twist, negative effects on accuracy due to the gas block on the barrel and higher cycle rates.

ADCOR President Jimmy Stavrakis on the ADCOR production floor with one of more than 60 CNC machines.

ADCOR Industries goes back to 1966 when Konstantinos Stavrakis, a Greek immigrant, bought his first lathe in Baltimore, Maryland. The struggling business was bought in 1990 when 23 year old Jimmy bought the business from his father and began ADCOR Industries. ADCOR is used to manufacturing high tech aerospace components such as components for the F16 fighter, U.S. Navy ballistic missiles as well as tools for the Hubble telescope. Currently one of ADCOR’s leading projects is in the high speed bottling industry, all over the world. These high-speed bottling machines can bottle or can up to 2,000 12 oz cans or bottles per minute ±1/10 grams of precision. These machines have more than 20,000 part numbers. The stack up tolerances must be precise for these machines to work properly. In the bottling business today more than 80% of everything bottled in North and South America is bottled on ADCOR machines. ADCOR employs 160 people in their 65,000 square foot Baltimore plant. ADCOR Industries is a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility with all modern CNC machinery, automated inventory control and a quality control laboratory worth several million dollars. To say ADCOR is brand new to the firearm business is not really correct at all. They manufactured up to 1,000 upper receivers a day for Colt Defense for their M4 carbines and other rifles including their difficult to manufacture 1-piece upper receiver. They began with the raw forgings and machined them to the point of them being shipped to be anodized. They also manufactured the heat sink on the Colt Infantry Automatic Rifle which was submitted and lost to the H&K416. Colt currently sells their IAR to law enforcement and international military. ADCOR Industries is AS9100 certified, which is the highest quality certification in the world. How Jimmy Stavrakis manages his family with four children, ADCOR Industries/ADCOR Defense and two Baltimore restaurants is a mystery; let alone taking on a new venture in the firearms industry.

The right side view of an ADCOR manufactured selective fire BEAR receiver. Notice the ADCOR/Brown designed ìDust Wiperî over the bolt and the polymer ejection port dust cover.

Jimmy and designer Michael Brown heard of the malfunctions with the M4 through the news and internet and saw exactly what the Army was looking for in a more durable and reliable weapon. After speaking with representatives from the Army, they decided to look at the problem and see if they could help the Army and provide the best weapon system to the American warfighter. Brown is an engineer by trade and never worked in the firearms development industry. In but 30 days time, he developed a revolutionary new weapon system which meets and exceeds what he was asked to build. By Brown not being from the firearms industry, he was not poisoned by the way things were always done as many in the industry are. Looking at most of the modern assault rifles they are very similar to each other with very minor changes. Starting with a new sheet of paper and a set of requirements Brown developed the B.E.A.R. (Brown Enhanced Automatic Rifle). The BEAR was shown to the industry for the first time at NSGW in 2010.

Shown is the prototype 7.62x39mm caliber Bear carbine with a C-Products magazine.

The BEAR upper receiver is unique compared to any previously fielded weapon system. It is very evident that the government is looking for a different operating system than the current direct gas impingement. They were looking at a weapon with the benefits of a piston operated rifle. However the direct gas impingement has some benefits as well. The BEAR takes the best of both worlds. Unlike the standard long and short stroke piston designs there is no large and heavy gas block added and pinned to the barrel causing decrease in accuracy due to the interruption of harmonics caused by the pinned-on block and the functioning of the piston and or operating rod impacting the gas block. Direct gas systems are known recently to have free floating barrels. The gas tube design puts very little stress on the rifle since it just taps the gas off the barrel and leads it to the carrier key. What if you could make a piston system do the same thing? The gas system is not pinned in place on the BEAR. The gas tube is attached by a light gas block to the barrel and the gas tube is horizontal and flat. The piston base is not attached to the barrel but the receiver. As the piston base is slid into the upper receiver the gas tube on the barrel slides into the piston block. The block it held into the receiver by a pin which is locked in place by the hand guard. Contained in the piston block is the piston and spring. ADCOR offers two piston bases. One which has a folding front sight attached and another that is flat for use with lower laying optics. In front of the piston is the gas plug which is held in place by a spring loaded detent pin. The gas plug is a critical part of what makes this system so different from the rest. The amount of gas bled into the system is not based on the gas port diameter in the barrel. On the direct gas impingement platform, the erosion of the gas port in the barrel causes a higher cycle rate and in turn failures to extract as well as parts breakage toward the middle and end of the rifle’s life. The gas plug on the BEAR determines the amount of gas entering the system. There are two gas ports on the plug. Depending on the ammunition it can be set for lower power .223 Rem or to the higher power 5.56mm ammunition. The cycle rate is kept in the 700 to 800 rounds per minute eliminating the need for a special H or H2 buffer. This holds true regardless of the length or thickness of the barrel. For military versions, the gas plugs has two settings as well, one for normal condition and the other for suppressed conditions. Suppressed is a very difficult condition for the conventional gas impingement operated rifle. The suppressor causes an over pressure condition in a system which is already high on the pressure spectrum. The cycle rate is driven up significantly higher when suppressed causing severe wear on the bolt mechanism including the extractor spring and much faster wear on parts as well as severe gas being blown back into the shooters face. The direct gas M4 does not have any adjustment to lessen the gas pressure taken into the system so it will run significantly faster with a suppressor. So no matter the extent of gas port erosion, the amount of gas and the cycle rate remain consistent throughout the life of the rifle. The gas system on the BEAR prevents higher cycle rate from gas port erosion, consistent cycle rate throughout the life of the weapon system, adjustments in the field to pick between using the rifle suppressed or not suppressed, does not transfer heat back into the receiver and does not direct residues from the gas to and deposit them in the bolt carrier group.

As of this writing, the newest member of the BEAR family a direct gas impingement BEAR rifle. A straight gas tube is attached to the end of the gas plug. The gas plug is rotated the same as the piston operated model to modify the amount of gas taken into the system.

The bolt carrier group on the BEAR is also redesigned to meet and exceed military requirements. The operating rod is attached to the carrier by the location of where the carrier key would normally go. It is held in place with two slots and then screwed into the bolt carrier assembly and the two screws are pinned in place. This corrects another problem found in having piston mechanisms in the M4 platform. On a standard short stroke tappet piston system in an M4, the operating rod strikes the carrier to drive it rearward. Due to the location of the impact point on the carrier the back rear bottom of the carrier tilts downward digging into the receiver extension. This is called carrier tilt. Many manufacturers have inserted skis on the bottom rear of the carrier to deal with this condition. It certainly improves the condition but does not eliminate it. The ADCOR system uses a long stroke design which evenly pushes the carrier to the rear keeping it inline the way the rifle was designed with no tilt. The rod actually guides the carrier to the rear keeping perfect alignment with the receiver extension. Another improvement to the carrier group is what ADCOR calls the Dust Wiper. Reading and hearing about the sand and debris that would enter the M4 through the three gas exhaust ports on the right side of the carrier would cause significant malfunctions if the dust cover was not closed. Also, when firing the rifle dirt can enter the mechanism due to the port cover being open. The engineered high heat resistant polymer dust wiper keeps the ejection port sealed at all times. The only time it is open is when the bolt carrier group is to the rear. When closed there is no way for dust, dirt or sand to enter the mechanism. The BEAR uses a standard M4 bolt, cam pin, firing pin and firing pin retainer pin. The carrier itself is chrome plated for easier cleaning.

ADCOR was not new to manufacturing weapon components. During a business relationship with Colt Defense, ADCOR produced thousands of upper receivers for Colt both standard M4/M16 upper receivers as well as the more complex one-piece upper receivers.

The upper receiver is a standard M4 upper with a modified detent in the fired cartridge case deflector to use the polymer dust cover. The upper has a forward assist. The front handguard locks into the upper giving a continuous top rail. The BEAR has a forward charging handle/forward assist which is reversible to either the right or left side. The bolt carrier can be actuated as well as if need be the forward handle can work as a forward assist.

“Close-up view of the gas plug and front sight base on the first prototype BEAR carbine built by Mike Brown.

The barrel is a cold hammer forged 1/7 inch twist manufactured by FN. The barrel is chrome plated and manganese phosphate finished. The FN machine gun barrel will give a longer service life compared to the standard button cut barrel of the current M4 carbine. All barrels are proof tested and magnetic particle tested. ADCOR gets barrels in 10.3, 14.5, 16 and 20 inch lengths. ADCOR has manufactured prototype barrels and will soon release BEAR rifles chambered in 7.62x39mm and 6.8mmSPC calibers. Brown is currently also working on a 7.62x51mm version of his BEAR rifle.

The lower receiver is stock M4-type. ADCOR manufactures their own lower receiver which contains a Magpul MOE pistol grip and stock. The stock has six positions rather than the standard 4 of the M4 carbine. Currently ADCOR is working on making the magazine and bolt catch ambidextrous.

The left side view of an ADCOR manufactured selective fire BEAR receiver.

The BEAR has been independently tested at White Laboratory in compliance with portions of the first Article Test Matrix, Carbine, 5.56mm, M4. Two were submitted by ADCOR with a total of 12,000 rounds fired of M855 Ball. Each rifle was fired in 120-round cycles consisting of:

  • 30 rounds in automatic mode in bursts of approximately 5 rounds each
  • 30 rounds in automatic mode in a single burst
  • 30 rounds in semiautomatic mode at a rate of 10 to 30 rounds per minute
  • 30 rounds in semiautomatic mode at a rate of 10 to 30 rounds per minute

The rifles were cooled and lubricated every 500 rounds. There were no stoppages of any kind during the testing. Accuracy/dispersion showed an extreme spread of 2.88 inches with M855 and four groups with Federal Match (69gr) ammunition gave a mean extreme spread of .88 inches. Also some adverse firing testing was conducted including the rifle was completely buried in play sand and submerged in five inches of water and fired a magazine of 30 rounds with no malfunctions. This is a significant test due to the fact a direct gas impingement M4 carbine must have the bolt open and the water seal broken and water drain out of the barrel before it can safely be fired. The ADCOR rifle can be removed from the water and fired without having to drain the barrel first.

Racks of commercial semiautomatic only BEAR rifles ready to go to the shipping department.

For those who are through and through direct gas impingement fans, ADCOR has a rifle for you. Knowing that there are those who prefer this method of operation ADCOR took their basic design and made some modifications. A straight gas tube is attached to the gas plug. The gas plug can be rotated 360° for either suppressed or unsuppressed fire. The bolt carrier group has been slightly modified. A carrier key is used which sits slightly higher than the standard M16/M4 key due to the ADCOR receivers. Two gas vent holes were added to the right side of the carrier. These holes are seen through a hole in the dust wiper. Another area Brown dealt with is the issue of carrier keys coming loose, causing gas leakage and eventual short stroking. Not only are the carrier keys torqued and staked, the screws additionally are locked in place with a roll pin on each screw. By the BEAR receiver design you can switch between the piston and direct gas impingement systems using the same barrel. By using the gas plug the gas is regulated so gas port erosion will have no effect on the cycle rate of the rifle. The dust wipers will prevent debris from entering the side of the receiver.

The gas tube on the barrel sits in a vertical position and is attached by a lightweight band secured with a set screw. The gas block slides onto the gas tube and is locked in place to the handguard, not the barrel, taking all stresses enacted by the piston of the firearm away from the barrel and into the receiver allowing a virtual free floating barrel assembly.

The rifle provided had a 16.1 inch FN produced 1/7 inch twist chrome lined barrel. It came with both front sight piston base as well as a standard piston base. It was provided with two Magpul PMags. It also came with a set of Magpul folding front and rear sights. All that was added to it was a KAC vertical pistol grip, an Insight Tech tactical light, an EOTech sight and Norgon ambidextrous magazine release button.

At the time this rifle arrived I received some of the new Lancer L5-AWM (Advanced Warfighter Magazine) magazines. This author has known these magazines since their early prototype stages they made with Colt Canada. The “green” magazine was to be a joint venture which Colt dropped out of and Lancer continued development of an advanced translucent magazine. Throughout the development different materials, different floor plates and capacities have been introduced. Currently Lancer Systems offers 5, 10, 20, 30 and 48 round magazines. The AWM is the next generation; there is significant change to the metal feed lip inserts. It is now one-piece and it wraps around the rear of the magazine extending to the forward edge of each side. The magazine has a ruff texture on the bottom to aid in handling in adverse conditions. One of the other most significant changes to the AWM is the floor plate. It is not hard plastic, rather it is rubber so it will not snag on clothing and pouches. And finally, you no longer need tools to disassemble and clean. You merely take a cartridge tip or suitable tool and push inward on the lock plate and the magazine disassembles for maintenance. The magazine features Lancers anti-tilt follower as well.

The operating rod is attached to the bolt carrier. This gives a straight even push on the carrier into the receiver extension eliminating bolt carrier tilt common on most all other piston operated AR-platform weapons using a short stroke tappet system. There are two locking surfaces that attach the operating rod to the bolt carrier and then two carrier key screws are torqued and staked in place.

The test rifle has been fired over 1,200 rounds of M193 ball ammunition and 100 rounds of Silver State Armory 5.56mm 69 grain OTM ammunition. All testing was done at 100 yards for accuracy. The groups with the Silver State Armory ammunition ranged between .80 and 1.25 inches. Tactical drills from 10 to 50 meters were quick and accurate.

While visiting ADCOR in their Baltimore office I had the opportunity to fire several other models of the BEAR weapon system. With Mike Brown and Jimmy Stavrakis diligently reloading magazines, I fired more than 300 rounds in a select fire 10.3 inch BEAR rifle. Having extensive trigger time on the MK18, there was a significant difference in controllability between the two. Recoil was much more manageable on the BEAR. Perhaps the lower cycle rate had much to do with it. The impulse felt lighter. The BEAR 14.5 inch rifle was just as pleasant firing nearly 180 rounds through that model. The next and most interesting was a suppressed 16 inch BEAR. This was extremely sweet to shoot. Due to the piston system, far less gas came back to hit me in the face. The only thing this rifle needed was a Precision Reflex Industries Gas Buster charging handle and it would be good to go. More that 600 or so rounds were fired, mostly on fully automatic without a single malfunction. Two members of the City of Baltimore SWAT team were there test firing and picking up their BEAR rifles for their team. In asking them about their testing results they claimed the BEAR rifle was the best of all the rifles they tested and look forward to procuring more in the future. ADCOR Defense has shipped out recent test and evaluation units to the FBI.

The gas plug regulates the gas entering the system, not the port. This makes gas port erosion having no effect on the cyclic rate of the weapon. Also, by rotating it, more or less gas will be allowed into the system. ADCOR has a plug which enables a mere 180∞ rotation to switch from unsuppressed to suppressed modes of fire.

The U.S. military has stated they see no need to replace the M4 carbine unless there is a “significant leap in technology.” Although several of the competition rifles display enhancements in reliability and durability over the M4, there just has not been enough to warrant a change. Significant leap in technology is very open ended and leaves much to interpret. The BEAR rifle will be in the run for the gold this summer. When looking at the BEAR, it has everything the Army has asked for. The accuracy of the direct gas, the cleanliness of a piston, forward charging handle, no carrier tilt, free float barrel, more durable barrel, ability to convert existing weapons, significant number of parts compatibility, easier to maintain, more reliable in adverse conditions and American made. With all the political pressure from those in Congress as well as certain segments of the military there is a very good chance the M4 will be replaced with a better weapon. The question is how long will it take and another important question is do we have the money for such a transition. It only makes sense to go with a better system that can retrofit existing service rifles. We will have to wait and see how it all turns out but the ADCOR BEAR will be a solid contender.

Most of the barrels provided on ADCOR rifles are cold hammer forged barrels manufactured by FNMI. They are 1/7 in twist and chrome plated. All barrels are test fired with a proof round and then magnetic particle inspected.
BEAR designer Michael Brown holding his first prototype carbine he produced in 30 days. This was Browns first ever attempt at designing and building a firearm.
This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V16N1 (March 2012)
Tags: 2012ADCOR DEFENSE B.E.A.R.Christopher R. BartocciMARCH 2012V16N1
Previous Post

INDUSTRY NEWS: V16N1

Next Post

FUTURE INFANTRY SMALL ARMS

Next Post
FUTURE INFANTRY SMALL ARMS

FUTURE INFANTRY SMALL ARMS

TRENDING STORIES

  • U.S. NAVY MK18 MOD O CUSTOM CLOSE QUARTER COMBAT WEAPON FOR THE SEAFARING SERVICE

    U.S. NAVY MK18 MOD O CUSTOM CLOSE QUARTER COMBAT WEAPON FOR THE SEAFARING SERVICE

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Recreational Use Of 40MM Grenade Launchers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Customizing the Already Custom SIG P320 Spectre Comp

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Col. Rex Applegate: The Knife Designs of a Close-Combat Legend

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Firearm Review: Pioneer Arms Classic AK in 7.62×39

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
U.S. NAVY MK18 MOD O CUSTOM CLOSE QUARTER COMBAT WEAPON FOR THE SEAFARING SERVICE

U.S. NAVY MK18 MOD O CUSTOM CLOSE QUARTER COMBAT WEAPON FOR THE SEAFARING SERVICE

Recreational Use Of 40MM Grenade Launchers

Recreational Use Of 40MM Grenade Launchers

SIG Spectre Comp with AXG Grip Module

Customizing the Already Custom SIG P320 Spectre Comp

Col. Rex Applegate: The Knife Designs of a Close-Combat Legend

Col. Rex Applegate: The Knife Designs of a Close-Combat Legend

New Review: V19N1

New Review: V23N3

SAR|Special

SAR|Special

The Grand Power Q100

The Grand Power Q100

A Fading Star: The star S135 Submachine Gun, That is

A Fading Star: The star S135 Submachine Gun, That is

The Luger Rifle

Where in the world is the Luger rifle?

Book Reviews: September 2016

BOOK REVIEW: Two Great MP40 Books 

Henk Visser Interview: SAR Talks Stoners, CETME, HK with One of the Founders of the Modern Small Arms Industry

Henk Visser Interview: SAR Talks Stoners, CETME, HK with One of the Founders of the Modern Small Arms Industry

The SCCY DVG-1—The Changer of Games

The SCCY DVG-1—The Changer of Games

QUICK LINKS

  • About Chipotle Publishing
  • About Small Arms Review
  • Advertise with Us
  • Write for Us

CONTACT DETAILS

  • Phone: +1 (702) 565-0746
  • E-mail: office@smallarmsreview.com
  • Web: www.chipotlepublishing.com
  • Chipotle Publishing, LLC 631 N. Stephanie St., No. 282, Henderson, NV 89014
Small Arms Review

FOLLOW US

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
      • Volume 12
      • Volume 13
      • Volume 14
      • Volume 15
      • Volume 16
      • Volume 17
      • Volume 18
      • Volume 19
      • Volume 20
      • Volume 21
      • Volume 22
      • Volume 23
      • Volume 24
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • FrankenGun Challenge
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Are you in the know?
Stay up to date with the latest articles.

Facebook-f Linkedin Instagram

Redirecting to External Website

You are leaving the Small Arms Review website and will be redirected to an external link in a 5 Seconds.
VISIT NOW!