Small Arms Review
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
No Result
View All Result
Small Arms Review
No Result
View All Result
Home Firearm History

Lebel Model 1886: the French Revolution of Service Rifles

by Pierangelo Tendas
December 26, 2023
in Firearm History
Lebel Model 1886: the French Revolution of Service Rifles

Introduced into French service in 1887, the Lebel Model 1886 bolt-action rifle was by far the most advanced service rifle of its time, giving French forces the edge over any enemy of the era. (Matteo Brogi)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

by Pierangelo Tendas

Designed in 1886 and adopted the following year by the French military, the Lebel Modèle 1886 has the distinction of being both France’s first repeating service rifle, and the world’s first service rifle chambered for a smokeless round.

The defeat in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870/1871 and the subsequent fall of the Second French Empire forced the newly formed Third French Republic to re-evaluate its military needs in light of the increasing mistrust towards the neighboring and aggressive German Empire. Over a decade after the end of what was arguably the most important conflict fought in Europe between the end of the Napoleonic wars and the onset of World War I, French infantrymen were becoming seriously outgunned if compared to the German troops, which were being issued with the new Mauser Model 71-84 repeater rifle – an upgrade over the Model 1871, using an eight-shot magazine tube.

A technical drawing of the Lebel action: the Mle.1886 shared numerous features with the Kropatschek Model 1878 11mm repeating rifle, used by the French Navy in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War.

On the other hand, the French Army was still issuing the Gras Model 1874 single-shot bolt-action rifle, essentially a brass cartridge conversion of the old Chassepot design, designed by Austrian engineer Alfred Von Kropatschek and chambered for the 11×59mm rimmed black powder caliber. The French Navy had it substantially better, with the Kropatschek Model 1878 rifle, which was basically a repeater version of the 1874 feeding through a magazine tube that held eight rounds. Both would, however, go down in history as interim adoptions with the next quantum leap in individual firearm technology being just around the corner.

The Lebel rifle was the outcome of a markedly revanchist effort: following the French defeat in the Franco-Prussian war, the French Ministry of War was eager to modernize its arsenals and exploit the recent French invention of smokeless powder to obtain the edge against their long-time rival, the German empire.

HARNESSING NEW TECHNOLOGY

Between 1882 and 1884, French chemist Paul Vieille perfected the first viable smokeless powder. His creation, named “Poudre B” (“B-powder”, where the B stood for “Blanche”, or “white”, thus meaning “white powder” in contrast to black powder), a nitrocellulose-based compound, was three times as powerful as black powder and generated a substantially lower amount of smoke and residue, keeping rifles cleaner and the rifleman’s field of view relatively unobstructed on the battlefield.

The formulation of smokeless powder, including the French Poudre B, would improve substantially in the coming years, but the French government was hell-bent on becoming an early adopter of such revolutionary military technology. The sitting French minister of war, revanchist general George Ernest Jean-Marie Boulanger, ordered the institution of a commission to design a new repeating service rifle using smokeless powder ammunition. Headed by general Baptiste Tramond, the commission was given orders to have a rifle ready within one year.

Part of the commission was Lt. Col. Nicolas Lebel, who came up with the idea of the first bullet used by the 8×50mm rimmed round for the new rifle. Dubbed the “Balle M”, this was a nickel-brass jacketed, round-nose, lead 232-grain bullet that would be safe for use in the intended feeding system – a tube magazine holding eight rounds, plus an additional ninth round in the elevator, as holding an additional round in chamber would be considered unsafe.

Despite Lebel’s contribution being limited mostly to that aspect – and despite the Balle M being replaced in a few years by a more effective boat-tailed Spitzer bullet – he received the honor of becoming the namesake of the new rifle. In his defense, for most of his life and up until the end, Lebel would insist that the creation was a collective effort, and that other members of the commission would have deserved that honor more than he did; those included famed colonel Yves Gras – a familiar name in French gunmaking at the time – and captain Georges Desaleux, who worked on the concept of the new 8×50mm Lebel cartridge; colonel Jean-François Marie Bonnet, who designed the bolt and its two sturdy parallel locking lugs necessary to withstand the pressure levels generated by the new smokeless propellant; and engineers Albert Close and Louis Verdin, weapon inspectors at the Châtellerault arsenal (better known as MAC), who worked with Gras for the best part of the engineering process, concerning both the rifle itself and the manufacturing technologies and machineries.

The right side of the Lebel Mle.1886 rifle: the overall length and the quirky features are due to the 8-rd magazine tube located under the barrel and the use of pre-existing machineries previously used to the manufacture of Kropatschek rifles. (Matteo Brogi)

BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY AND NEW FEATURES

The commission had been directed to design the new rifle so that it could be compatible with existing stock of spare parts for the Gras and Kropatschek rifles, particularly the Navy-issue Kropatschek Model 1878 repeater. Additionally, the 8×50R Lebel cartridge was designed to be manufactured on the existing tooling used to make 11mm Gras ammunition. Hence, features such as the magazine tube (slow to load but offering a relatively high capacity for the time and featuring a manual cut-off feature, a very popular feat among military rifles back in the day), the straight trigger, horizontal-handle bolt action with cock-on-open, 90-degree bolt throw, and rimmed cartridge case.

A Lebel Mle.1886 M93 service rifle, seen from the left side, compared to a Lebel “Scolaire” rimfire carbine, dating to the 1920s. (Matteo Brogi)

That’s not to say that the new Lebel rifle – designated as the Modèle 1886 – didn’t have any merit on its own, though. It was built on an incredibly robust machined steel receiver, to withstand what were arguably the highest pressures sustained by a service rifle back in the day. The wooden stock was composed of two separate pieces – buttstock and handguard – and despite inheriting a huge deal of drawbacks from the designs that preceded it, the Lebel 1886 rifle packed a hell of a lot of firepower for its time, being far superior to its most direct competitor, the German Mauser 1871/84. The 8mm Lebel round, loaded with smokeless powder, developed a muzzle velocity of 700m/s (2296.59 fps) and offered a maximum effective range of 3500 yards, making it superior in terms of performance to the .303 Mk1 cartridge being adopted around the same time for the MLM Magazine Lee-Metford rifles of the British Empire.

PRODUCTION, INITIAL RECEPTION, AND UPDATES

The three French state-owned arsenals of Saint-Étienne, Châtellerault, and Tulle were all instructed to start mass manufacturing the new Lebel Model 1886 service rifle at once. General Boulanger’s plans were to procure one million samples by May 1887, but that goal soon turned out to be unrealistic and in the same year Boulanger was sacked from his position as the minister of war for his revanchist approach that risked sparking a new war with Germany. Nevertheless, the combined effort of the three arsenals allowed the French military to acquire over two million Lebel Mle.1886 rifles in six years, along with a quadrangular épée-style bayonet aptly dubbed the Model 1886.

A Lebel Mle.1886 M93 R35 carbine: a number of Mle.1886 M93 rifles were converted to carbines for colonial mounted troops after World War I and remained in French service well into the 1960s. (Collectors Firearms)

As usual with newly adopted service rifles, the troops immediately started reporting the first teething issues: the rear sight assembly – whose ramp was adjustable to engage targets at 2,400 meters, or a little bit over 2,624 yards, a very optimistic estimate for the average infantryman despite the technical capabilities of the ammunition – required strengthening, and the bolt needed to be modified with a gas shield to protect the shooter’s face from the hazard of potential cartridge case ruptures. Said modifications were applied in 1893; the modified rifle came to be known as the Lebel Modèle 1886 Modifié 1893, or Mle.1886 M93 for short. Basically, all pre-existing Mle.1886 rifles were retrofitted to the M93 standard in relatively short time, which is why original, non-modified Lebel 1886 rifles are exceedingly rare today.

Being largely inspired by the Kropatschek, the Lebel Mle.1886 features a horizontal charging handle with a 90-degree bolt throw. (Matteo Brogi)
The straight trigger was another feature of the Lebel Mle.1886 patterned after the pre-existing Gras and Kropatschek rifles. The nut in front of the trigger guard is the magazine cut-off, a common feature for repeating service rifles of the day, which allowed the Mle.1886 to be used as a single-shot rifle to prevent soldiers from wasting ammunition. (Matteo Brogi)
The magazine tube of the Lebel Mle.1886 was slow to reload but offered a staggering capacity of eight rounds (plus one on the elevator), by far the highest available on any service rifle of its day. (Matteo Brogi)
The bolt of the Mle.1886 Lebel rifle was extremely sturdy, more than adequate to withstand the high levels of pressure generated by the Poudre B, the world’s first smokeless propellant which was three times more powerful than black powder. (Matteo Brogi)
The ladder sight of the Mle.1886 rifle, adjustable to very optimistic ranging levels, as the technical capabilities of the 8mm Lebel round were often not matched by the capabilities of the individual shooters, was the other feature that required changing during the transition to the M93 standard. (Matteo Brogi)

FURTHER AMMUNITION DEVELOPMENT

Field experience with the Mle.1886 M93 issued across the board in the vast French colonial empire and elsewhere, such as in the French concessions in China, where it was used by the French troops that contributed to quell the Boxer Rebellion of 1899-1901, also led to modifications to the ammunition. As stated above, the original round-nose bullet was replaced with a Spitzer (a.k.a. pointed tip), boat-tail bullet for improved performance. The new round, dubbed “Balle D”, has the distinction of being the first boat-tail bullet ammunition ever adopted for military service. The new Balle D also featured a slight annular rebate around the primer pocket to prevent accidental ignition in the magazine tube, a wise and cautious move on the behalf of the French engineers. The modification was conceived by Georges Desaleux, a member of the original engineering team for the rifle, although, to be fair, no such catastrophic incident was ever recorded with any Lebel 1886 rifle and any type of ammunition. The 8×50R ammunition would be subject to a further safety modification much further on, in 1912, with the adoption of the “Balle D A.M.” load, with “A.M.” standing for “Amorcage Modifié” (“modified primer”), whose primers were crimped to prevent bulging and expulsion from their pocket when the ammunition was used in a machine gun such as the Saint-Étienne Mle.1907 or, later, the Hotchkiss Mle.1914.

Some technical drawings of the 8×50 Lebel rimmed cartridge; modernized numerous times, it was the first military-issue round in the world to use a smokeless propellant. Three-round stripper clips were developed in the early 1900s for the Berthier carbine.

After WWI, a new round would be launched for the Lebel rifles still in service. Dubbed the “Balle N”, which was loaded with a steel-jacketed, Spitzer, boat-tail, lead bullet that had initially been designed for the Hotchkiss machine gun and required rifles to be rebored before they could safely fire it. The fact that rifles introduced back in 1886 were still around at the eve of World War II shouldn’t come as a surprise for the reader: the Lebel was, after all, a mighty solid rifle, although pushed into early obsolescence by the widespread adoption of smokeless powder cartridges by other countries.

PHASING OUT THE LEBEL

With most nations adopting rimless cartridge designs, quick reloading via detachable magazines and stripper clips became feasible and improved the volume of fire that an individual infantryman could provide at any given time. In 1906, the French military started to research a new service rifle that would replace the Lebel and give them the edge against their arch enemy, Germany, once again. Berthier bolt-action rifles were issued as a stop-gap measure to colonial troops, chambered in 8×50R Lebel and, later, in 7.5mm. But at the turn of the 20th Century, thus much before other countries, the French had their eyes already set on adopting a semi-automatic rifle. Tentatively, this had to be the Meunier A6, chambered in a powerful 7×59mm round, but the lengthy development process led to just about 1000 Meunier A6 rifles being manufactured before WWI broke out.

French troops thus found themselves fighting off advancing German armies for four years using a mishmash of Berthier 1892 rifles, a large quantity of Lebel Mle.1886 M93, and several tens of thousands of RSC M1917 and M1918 semi-automatic, gas-operated rifles chambered in 8×50R Lebel and designed to be assembled using numerous Lebel rifle components. The Lebel rifle could be equipped with a muzzle-mounted launcher for the VB Viven-Bessières rifle grenades, and it often was during the conflict. Accuracy of the rifle was deemed good enough that French snipers during WW1 were equipped with Lebel rifles supplied with two types of scopes – the APX Model 1916 and APX Model 1917, manufactured by the State-owned Atelier de Construction de Puteaux.

If need be, the Lebel Mle.1886 could host a tenth round in chamber. Such practice was considered “unsafe”, not due to inherent technical issues with the design but because it was standard practice and military doctrine to carry service rifles with an empty chamber. And because of that, like many service rifles of its time, the Lebel Mle.1886 never featured any manual safety of sorts. (Matteo Brogi)
The Lebel Mle.1886 was soon modernized into the Mle.1886 M93, which remained basically unchanged until the end of its service life. One of the modifications was the installation of a shield in front of the bolt to protect the shooter’s face in the event of a cartridge case rupture. (Matteo Brogi)
The Lebel rifle featured a four groove, left-to-right-twist barrel and a sturdy front sight. In WWI, it was often fitted with launching cups for VB (Viven-Bessières) grenades. (Matteo Brogi)

The retirement of the Lebel rifle was long postponed at the end of the “war to end all wars”, due to a lack of political interest in rearmament and the poor state of the French economy. Before, during, and after WWI quantities of the Lebel rifle were sold to Greece and Ethiopia, among others, as well as to the Republican side during the Spanish civil war. The MAS 1936 bolt-action rifle arrived too late, and the RSC 1917 and 1918 rifles were too scarce to fully replace it, and soldiers overall liked the high capacity of the old Lebel. A more advanced scope, the APX Model 1921, was developed for sniper-issued Lebel rifles and used up until the end of WWII, which saw French troops still fielding the old 1886 warhorse in very significant quantities.

A quadrangular, épée-style stabbing bayonet, dubbed the Model 1886, was developed for the Lebel rifle.

Meanwhile, newly manufactured, refurbished Lebel rifles, and carbines had found their way through mail order to French civilians, with Manufrance being the biggest distributor. The history of Manufrance commercial developments over the Lebel rifle warrants an article on its own, but in the inter-war period, a significant quantity of Lebel Mle.1886 M93 rifles were repurposed, refurbished, and converted into short carbines or mounted colonial troops in French Africa by Manufacture Nationale d’Armes de Tulle (“Tulle National Weapons Factory”) the French state-owned weapons manufacturer in the town of Tulle, Corrèze. These carbines, dubbed the Lebel Mle.1886 M93 R35, along with pre-existing Mle.1886 M93 rifles, saw use during WWII. They were captured by Axis powers and deployed by their rear line units during the last chaotic months of the war, ultimately ending its tour of duty in the French military when they were issued to local colonial auxiliary troops in Algeria and Indochina before being finally being completely replaced across the board by the MAS 49 and MAS 49/56 semi-automatic rifles. To this day, functional Lebel rifles can still be found in the hands of irregular militias in Africa and the Far East.

LEGACY OF THE LEBEL RIFLE

Nowadays, the Lebel Mle.1886 M93 rifle and M93 R35 carbine are appreciated collectibles among shooters in North America and Europe. Paradoxically, up until fairly recently, their motherland of France was the country where they were least easily available.

The Lebel saw a certain degree of commercial success before WWII, both in terms of export military sales and civilian versions. The Lebel “Scolaire” (“Instructional”), manufactured by Manufrance, was a scaled-down sporting and training version of the Lebel design marketed in the 1920s.

Until France implemented the 2008/51/EC European Firearms Directive in its national laws (which back then considered every firearm ever fielded by the French military or any other armed force in the world in the past century or so to be still a “military firearm”), the Lebel Mle.1886 rifle was considered a 1ére Categorie or “Category 1” firearm – essentially a “weapon of war”, like a machine-gun. Lebel rifles were thus often converted to calibers such as 348 Winchester for civilian sales in France. With such restrictions gone, now the original 8mm Lebel rifle in all its variants is considered a Catégorie C firearm in France, requiring registration of ownership, but no license for purchase or possession by anybody over the age of 16.

A close-up of the breech on a Lebel “Scolaire” rifle by Manufrance. The Lebel “Scolaire” was a single-shot rifle, available in 6mm Flobert, 22 Short, and 22 Long Rifle, among others. There are not enough elements to confirm whether or not the Lebel “Scolaire” saw any formal use as a training rifle with the French armed forces. It was, however, used in French public schools back when target shooting was part of its educational curricula. (Matteo Brogi)

Interestingly enough, the Lebel name still lives on in modern French gun making, having been adopted by Verney-Carron, a well-known manufacturer of hunting and sporting firearms based in Saint-Étienne, as the new brand name for its line of riot control weapons and MIL/LE armaments. On November 8, 2023, Verney-Carron was contracted to deliver 10,000 assault rifles based on the M4 platform, 2000 designated marksman rifles based on the AR-10 design, and 400 40x46mm SR grenade launchers, all under the Lebel brand, to the armed forces of Ukraine. The contract is worth €36m, or just over US$39m at the current exchange rate. Deliveries will start in 2024.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
ManufacturerFrench Government arsenals in Tulle, Saint-Étienne and Châtellerault
ModelFusil Lebel Modèle 1886 – Modèle 1886 M93 – Modèle 1886 M93 R35
TypeService rifle
Caliber8mm Lebel (8×50mm R)
ActionBolt-Action
SafetyNone
Capacity8-rd magazine tube + 1 on the elevator + 1 in chamber (Mle.1886, Mle.1886 M93)
3-rd magazine tube + 1 on the elevator + 1 in chamber
(Mle.1886 M93 R35 carbine)
Sight systemsFixed front post, adjustable rear ramp
Barrel length31.5 in. (Mle.1886, Mle.1886 M93) 17.7 in. (Mle.1886 M93 R35 carbine) 4 grooves, LH
Total length51.2 in. (Mle.1886, Mle.1886 M93)
37.8 in. (Mle.1886 M93 R35 carbine)
Weight (empty)9.35 lb. (Mle.1886, Mle.1886 M93)
8.28 lb. (Mle.1886 M93 R35 carbine)
MaterialsWood, Steel

Author

  • Pierangelo Tendas
    Pierangelo Tendas

    Pierangelo Tendas (born in Italy in 1983) holds a university degree in journalism and has been active as a gun writer in Europe since 2004. In the past two decades, his articles have been published on Diana Armi, Armi e munizioni, Armi - The European magazine, Tecnologia e difesa and GUNSweek.com in Italy; All4shooters.com in Germany; Střelecká revue in the Czech Republic; and Small Arms Review and Small Arms Defense Journal in the United States. Lives in Sardinia, Italy.

    View all posts
Tags: BalleFranceLebelLebel 1886PoudreWWIWWII
Previous Post

Feed That Launcher! Legal Ammo for 37mm and 40mm Launchers 

Next Post

ELIMINATING THE THREAT: Development of the U.S. M79 Grenade Launcher 

Next Post
ELIMINATING THE THREAT: Development of the U.S. M79 Grenade Launcher 

ELIMINATING THE THREAT: Development of the U.S. M79 Grenade Launcher 

TRENDING STORIES

  • VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Complete Guide To Colt M-16 Models: Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Second Generation AR57: Drop-in 5.7 Upper For Your AR

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Forgotten M16A1 Rifle Manufacturers: GM/Hydra-Matic and Harrington & Richardson – Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The New Light and Handy Ruger American Generation II Ranch Rifle

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

RECENT POSTS

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

June 27, 2024
The Importance of Offhand Shooting

The Importance of Offhand Shooting

June 25, 2024
BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

June 20, 2024
True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

June 18, 2024
Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

June 6, 2024

QUICK LINKS

  • About Chipotle Publishing
  • About Small Arms Review
  • Advertise with Us
  • Write for Us

CONTACT DETAILS

  • Phone: +1 (702) 565-0746
  • E-mail: office@smallarmsreview.com
  • Web: www.chipotlepublishing.com
  • Chipotle Publishing, LLC 631 N. Stephanie St., No. 282, Henderson, NV 89014
Small Arms Review

FOLLOW US

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
      • Volume 12
      • Volume 13
      • Volume 14
      • Volume 15
      • Volume 16
      • Volume 17
      • Volume 18
      • Volume 19
      • Volume 20
      • Volume 21
      • Volume 22
      • Volume 23
      • Volume 24
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Redirecting to External Website

You are leaving the Small Arms Review website and will be redirected to an external link in a 5 Seconds.
VISIT NOW!