Small Arms Review
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
        • V1N1 (Oct 1997)
        • V1N2 (Nov 1997)
        • V1N3 (Dec 1997)
        • V1N4 (Jan 1998)
        • V1N5 (Feb 1998)
        • V1N6 (Mar 1998)
        • V1N7 (Apr 1998)
        • V1N8 (May 1998)
        • V1N9 (Jun 1998)
        • V1N10 (Jul 1998)
        • V1N11 (Aug 1998)
        • V1N12 (Sep 1998)
      • Volume 2
        • V2N1 (Oct 1998)
        • V2N2 (Nov 1998)
        • V2N3 (Dec 1998)
        • V2N4 (Jan 1999)
        • V2N5 (Feb 1999)
        • V2N6 (Mar 1999)
        • V2N7 (Apr 1999)
        • V2N8 (May 1999)
        • V2N9 (Jun 1999)
        • V2N10 (Jul 1999)
        • V2N11 (Aug 1999)
        • V2N12 (Sep 1999)
      • Volume 3
        • V3N1 (Oct 1999)
        • V3N2 (Nov 1999)
        • V3N3 (Dec 1999)
        • V3N4 (Jan 2000)
        • V3N5 (Feb 2000)
        • V3N6 (Mar 2000)
        • V3N7 (Apr 2000)
        • V3N8 (May 2000)
        • V3N9 (Jun 2000)
        • V3N10 (Jul 2000)
        • V3N11 (Aug 2000)
        • V3N12 (Sep 2000)
      • Volume 4
        • V4N1 (Oct 2000)
        • V4N2 (Nov 2000)
        • V4N3 (Dec 2000)
        • V4N4 (Jan 2001)
        • V4N5 (Feb 2001)
        • V4N6 (Mar 2001)
        • V4N7 (Apr 2001)
        • V4N8 (May 2001)
        • V4N9 (Jun 2001)
        • V4N10 (Jul 2001)
        • V4N11 (Aug 2001)
        • V4N12 (Sep 2001)
      • Volume 5
        • V5N1 (Oct 2001)
        • V5N2 (Nov 2001)
        • V5N3 (Dec 2001)
        • V5N4 (Jan 2002)
        • V5N5 (Feb 2002)
        • V5N6 (Mar 2002)
        • V5N7 (Apr 2002)
        • V5N8 (May 2002)
        • V5N9 (Jun 2002)
        • V5N10 (Jul 2002)
        • V5N11 (Aug 2002)
        • V5N12 (Sep 2002)
      • Volume 6
        • V6N1 (Oct 2002)
        • V6N2 (Nov 2002)
        • V6N3 (Dec 2002)
        • V6N4 (Jan 2003)
        • V6N5 (Feb 2003)
        • V6N6 (Mar 2003)
        • V6N7 (Apr 2003)
        • V6N8 (May 2003)
        • V6N9 (Jun 2003)
        • V6N10 (Jul 2003)
        • V6N11 (Aug 2003)
        • V6N12 (Sep 2003)
      • Volume 7
        • V7N1 (Oct 2003)
        • V7N2 (Nov 2003)
        • V7N3 (Dec 2003)
        • V7N4 (Jan 2004)
        • V7N5 (Feb 2004)
        • V7N6 (Mar 2004)
        • V7N7 (Apr 2004)
        • V7N8 (May 2004)
        • V7N9 (Jun 2004)
        • V7N10 (Jul 2004)
        • V7N11 (Aug 2004)
        • V7N12 (Sep 2004)
      • Volume 8
        • V8N1 (Oct 2004)
        • V8N2 (Nov 2004)
        • V8N3 (Dec 2004)
        • V8N4 (Jan 2005)
        • V8N5 (Feb 2005)
        • V8N6 (Mar 2005)
        • V8N7 (Apr 2005)
        • V8N8 (May 2005)
        • V8N9 (Jun 2005)
        • V8N10 (Jul 2005)
        • V8N11 (Aug 2005)
        • V8N12 (Sep 2005)
      • Volume 9
        • V9N1 (Oct 2005)
        • V9N2 (Nov 2005)
        • V9N3 (Dec 2005)
        • V9N4 (Jan 2006)
        • V9N5 (Feb 2006)
        • V9N6 (Mar 2006)
        • V9N7 (Apr 2006)
        • V9N8 (May 2006)
        • V9N9 (Jun 2006)
        • V9N10 (Jul 2006)
        • V9N11 (Aug 2006)
        • V9N12 (Sep 2006)
      • Volume 10
        • V10N1 (Oct 2006)
        • V10N2 (Nov 2006)
        • V10N3 (Dec 2006)
        • V10N4 (Jan 2007)
        • V10N5 (Feb 2007)
        • V10N6 (Mar 2007)
        • V10N7 (Apr 2007)
        • V10N8 (May 2007)
        • V10N9 (Jun 2007)
        • V10N10 (Jul 2007)
        • V10N11 (Aug 2007)
        • V10N12 (Sep 2007)
      • Volume 11
        • V11N1 (Oct 2007)
        • V11N2 (Nov 2007)
        • V11N3 (Dec 2007)
        • V11N4 (Jan 2008)
        • V11N5 (Feb 2008)
        • V11N6 (Mar 2008)
        • V11N7 (Apr 2008)
        • V11N8 (May 2008)
        • V11N9 (Jun 2008)
        • V11N10 (Jul 2008)
        • V11N11 (Aug 2008)
        • V11N12 (Sep 2008)
      • Volume 12
        • V12N1 (Oct 2008)
        • V12N2 (Nov 2008)
        • V12N3 (Dec 2008)
        • V12N4 (Jan 2009)
        • V12N5 (Feb 2009)
        • V12N6 (Mar 2009)
        • V12N7 (Apr 2009)
        • V12N8 (May 2009)
        • V12N9 (Jun 2009)
        • V12N10 (Jul 2009)
        • V12N11 (Aug 2009)
        • V12N12 (Sep 2009)
      • Volume 13
        • V13N1 (Oct 2009)
        • V13N2 (Nov 2009)
        • V13N3 (Dec 2009)
        • V13N4 (Jan 2010)
        • V13N5 (Feb 2010)
        • V13N6 (Mar 2010)
        • V13N7 (Apr 2010)
        • V13N8 (May 2010)
        • V13N9 (Jun 2010)
        • V13N10 (Jul 2010)
        • V13N11 (Aug 2010)
        • V13N12 (Sep 2010)
      • Volume 14
        • V14N1 (Oct 2010)
        • V14N2 (Nov 2010)
        • V14N3 (Dec 2010)
          • Ammunition
        • V14N4 (Jan 2011)
        • V14N5 (Feb 2011)
        • V14N6 (Mar 2011)
        • V14N7 (Apr 2011)
        • V14N8 (May 2011)
        • V14N9 (Jun 2011)
        • V14N10 (Jul 2011)
        • V14N11 (Aug 2011)
        • V14N12 (Sep 2011)
      • Volume 15
        • V15N1 (Oct 2011)
        • V15N2 (Nov 2011)
        • V15N4 (Jan 2012)
        • V15N5 (Feb 2012)
      • Volume 16
        • V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)
        • V16N2 (2nd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N3 (3rd Quarter 2012)
        • V16N4 (4th Quarter 2012)
      • Volume 17
        • V17N1 (1st Quarter 2013)
        • V17N2 (2nd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N3 (3rd Quarter 2013)
        • V17N4 (4th Quarter 2013)
      • Volume 18
        • V18N1 (Jan Feb 2014)
        • V18N2 (Mar Apr 2014)
        • V18N3 (May Jun 2014)
        • V18N4 (Jul Aug 2014)
        • V18N5 (Sep Oct 2014)
        • V18N6 (Nov Dec 2014)
      • Volume 19
        • V19N1 (Jan 2015)
        • V19N2 (Feb Mar 2015)
        • V19N3 (Apr 2015)
        • V19N4 (May 2015)
        • V19N5 (Jun 2015)
        • V19N6 (Jul 2015)
        • V19N7 (Aug Sep 2015)
        • V19N8 (Oct 2015)
        • V19N9 (Nov 2015)
        • V19N10 (Dec 2015)
      • Volume 20
        • V20N1 (Jan 2016)
        • V20N2 (Feb Mar 2016)
        • V20N3 (Apr 2016)
        • V20N4 (May 2016)
        • V20N5 (Jun 2016)
        • V20N6 (Jul 2016)
        • V20N7 (Aug Sep 2016)
        • V20N8 (Oct 2016)
        • V20N9 (Nov 2016)
        • V20N10 (Dec 2016)
      • Volume 21
        • V21N1 (Jan 2017)
        • V21N2 (Feb Mar 2017)
        • V21N3 (Apr 2017)
        • V21N4 (May 2017)
        • V21N5 (Jun 2017)
        • V21N6 (Jul 2017)
        • V21N7 (Aug Sep 2017)
        • V21N8 (Oct 2017)
        • V21N9 (Nov 2017)
        • V21N10 (Dec 2017)
      • Volume 22
        • V22N1 (Jan 2018)
        • V22N2 (Feb 2018)
        • V22N3 (March 2018)
        • V22N4 (Apr 2018)
        • V22N5 (May 2018)
        • V22N6 (Jun Jul 2018)
        • V22N7 (Aug Sep 2018)
        • V22N8 (Oct 2018)
        • V22N9 (Nov 2018)
        • V22N10 (Dec 2018)
      • Volume 23
        • V23N1 (Jan 2019)
        • V23N2 (Feb 2019)
        • V23N3 (Mar 2019)
        • V23N4 (Apr 2019)
        • V23N5 (May 2019)
        • V23N6 (Jun Jul 2019)
        • V23N7 (Aug Sep 2019)
        • V23N8 (Oct 2019)
        • V23N9 (Nov 2019)
        • V23N10 (Dec 2019)
      • Volume 24
        • V24N1 (Jan 2020)
        • V24N2 (Feb 2020)
        • V24N3 (Mar 2020)
        • V24N4 (Apr 2020)
        • V24N5 (May 2020)
        • V24N6 (Jun Jul 2020)
        • V24N7 (Aug Sep 2020)
        • V24N8 (Oct 2020)
        • V24N9 (Nov 2020)
        • V24N10 (Dec 2020)
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal


No Result
View All Result
Small Arms Review


No Result
View All Result
Home Articles Articles by Issue Volume 16 V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012)

THE SOVIET AK74 & KREBS CUSTOM AK74 RIFLE

by SAR Staff
March 1, 2012
in V16N1 (1st Quarter 2012), Ammunition, Articles, Articles by Issue, Guns & Parts, Search by Issue, Volume 16
THE SOVIET AK74 & KREBS CUSTOM AK74 RIFLE
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Christopher R. Bartocci

Russian soldiers marching with their AK74M rifles.

The introduction of the 5.56x45mm M16 rifle in the early 1960’s changed the outlook of the modern battle rifle all over the world, including behind the iron curtain. Within the Soviet Union studies were ongoing at the Tsnii Tochmash small arms ammunition bureau at Klimovsk under direction of engineer Viktor M. Sabelnikov and his design team. Depending on who you interview, some claim that the early development of the 5.45x39mm cartridge was underway prior to the release of the 5.56x45mm by the United States. But looking at the timeline, clearly the combat performance of the 5.56x45mm in Vietnam influenced the 5.45x39mm adoption by the Soviet Union. The time period of development from 1964 to 1970 spawned the prototype 5.6x41mm round. This cartridge was a necked down 7.62x39mm cartridge case. During the development of the cartridge the diameter of the cartridge case was reduced as well as the overall length resulting in the final Model 74 (M74) 5.45x39mm cartridge.

In terms of ballistic capabilities, the 5.45x39mm is the least powerful military cartridge on the modern battlefield. The old saying about how size does not matter – it is how you use it; fits the description of the 5.45x39mm cartridge perfectly. The muzzle velocity of the M74 cartridge is 2,952 feet per second with muzzle energy of 1,365 joules. This is less than the 5.56x45mm, as well as the previous 7.62x39mm, however, the construction of the projectile puts it on a level playing field making it out-perform its predecessor, the 7.62x39mm. Due to the dynamics of the 5.45x39mm round, the rim of the cartridge case had to be thicker and stronger to deal with the higher extraction force of the round. The projectile is not seated as deeply in the cartridge case as a standard 5.56mm round and the projectile is significantly longer as well. Like its 7.62x39mm counterpart, the 5.45x39mm projectile consists of a steel jacket, steel penetrator core, lead alloy around the sides and on top of the steel penetrator. However, there is an empty space between the tip of the lead and the tip of the projectile. What this does is greatly increase its terminal performance over that of the 7.62x39mm cartridge. When the projectile hits tissue the lead core shifts in the tip causing the projectile to yaw in about 4 inches consistently opposed to the 7.62x39mm projectile beginning to yaw at nearly 10 inches in depth. In many cases that could be thicker than a body it strikes. This is consistent and repeatable. The length of the projectile and keeping the center of gravity in the rear of the projectile, plus the velocity, keep this performance repeatable and reliable. Additional benefits of the 5.45x39mm round are that its trajectory is much flatter than that of the 7.62x39mm allowing the 5.45x39mm to be able to hit targets out to 400 to 500 meters. The 52 grain projectile is fired from a 16.3 inch chrome lined barrel with 1 turn in 9.25 inches giving the projectile nearly 3,830 revolutions per second.

AK74 (top) and the RPK74 (bottom). Notice the 45-round magazine in the RPK74.

The weapon development ran concurrently with the design of the rifle. The Soviets like proven designs that do exactly what they are designed to do. However, every soldier wants a lighter weapon that is more accurate, has less recoil and is more lethal than what they currently have. The development of the AK74 gave the Soviet soldier just what they asked for. The 5.45x39mm round decreases recoil significantly, making the AK74 more effective on automatic fire.

The AK74 has many changes from the AKM and throughout the service of the rifle changes have been made to further improve the performance of the rifle. The AK47/AKM is world famous for reliability under terrible conditions. The AK74 is even more reliable. The bolt carrier to bolt ratio is 5 to 1 on the AKM, the AK74 has a bolt carrier to bolt ratio of 6 to 1. What this does is with the heavier bolt carrier to bolt ratio provides more inertia to chamber a difficult round. This increased ratio also increases rearward velocity which in turn increases extraction force. This is a great benefit but it prematurely wears the extractor so there was a new improved stronger extractor designed for the AK74.

The front sight base is similar to that of the AKM with a major difference. The muzzle brake is attached directly to the front sight base, not the barrel. The front sight is adjusted for both windage and elevation the same as the predecessor.

Starting at the rear of the rifle, the original stocks were manufactured from plywood to increase strength. You will also notice a groove in each side of the stock; this was done to decrease weight according to Mikhail Kalashnikov. A metal buttplate was added to the rear with ridges on it to make the butt less likely to slip off the shoulder of the shooter. The AKS74 eliminated the less comfortable under-folding stock for a side-folding stock. This stock folded to the left side of the rifle so there would be no interference with the function or manipulation of the bolt and selector lever. There is a stock catch on the left side of the receiver just behind the handguard and the release is located on the left side of the receiver. In 1991 the metal side-folding stock was replaced (AK74M) with a folding high strength black polymide side folding stock. Original rifles utilized plywood stocks and handguards. Pistol grips were manufactured of wood and quickly replaced by polymide grips which were found in maroon, plum and finally black in color. Handguards were manufactured in wood and later the late 1980’s were replaced with plum color PA6 polymer butt stocks and handguards. In 1991 the plum color stocks were replaced with black polymide ones on the AK74M rifle.

Romanian produced AK74 (top) and current Russian produced AK74 (bottom). Notice the difference in the shape of the gas blocks as well as the muzzle brakes. Also the difference in the receiver covers.

Early Russian AK74 rifles utilized the AKM reinforced receiver cover (ribbed). This was later in 1993 changed back to the standard smooth receiver cover. The rear sight base is modified for the trajectory/drop of the 5.45x39mm cartridge. The slope was not as steep due to the significantly more flat shooting projectile.

The bolt carrier was changed as well to accommodate the 5.45x39mm bolt. The hole in the carrier that the bolt rides in was decreased in diameter to accommodate the smaller diameter bolt. This additional material left in the bolt increased the bolt carrier to bolt ratio from 5 to 1 to 6 to 1 as previously stated. The shape of the cocking handle also evolved over time. It should be noted the Romanian AK74-type rifles have a charging handle that curves upward. This is a very unique to Romanian rifles. The piston of the Russian designed rifle was change as well. The original AK74 gas piston, like the previous AK47 and AKM had two circular grooves in the piston; in 1989 these grooves were eliminated for ease of production. There was no real purpose for these grooves.

Magazines for the 5.45x39mm are normally manufactured from polymer. There are exceptions; particularly in Romania and Poland who manufacture steel magazines. Shown from left to right are black, brown Bulgarian magazines, and East German Bakelite magazine, Russian Bakelite magazine and a Russian 45 round RPK74 Bakelite magazine.

The gas block is another major change in the change in calibers. The standard AK47 and AKM rifles use a gas port that is drilled at a 45-degree angle. This is very identifiable in the shape of the gas block; there is more of a slope on the front of the gas block. It should be noted that an angular gas block does eliminate many issues related to gas port erosion. When the barrel was chambered in the 5.45x39mm caliber it was found that the higher velocity projectile was experiencing sheering of the jacket material as the projectile passed the gas port. To prevent this, the gas port was drilled at a 90-degree angle. This change was made in 1977. All AK100 series rifles use a 90-degree gas block regardless of their calibers.

The front sight base is quite different from that of the AKM. The front portion of the block is threaded to accept the 24mm muzzle brake. The threads are 24×1.5mm right hand as opposed to the 14x1mm left threads of the AK47/AKM which it replaces. Sight adjustment of the front sight is the same as its predecessors. The threading of the front sight post was altered to adjust for the adjustments of the 5.45x39mm cartridge. There are two mounting studs on the front sight base. The one closest to the muzzle is for attaching a bayonet. Due to the use of the muzzle brake, the bayonet front attaches to the front of the muzzle brake and the rear locks into the stud on the front of the front sight base. The rear stud is for mounting accessories such as a grenade launcher. Also the front sight base is the guide for storage of the cleaning rod.

Close view of the gas blocks. Notice the gas block on the Romanian (top) is angular so the gas port is drilled at a 45∞ angle. The bottom is a Russian produced AK74M which is straight; this is a 90∞ gas port. This change was due to the angular gas port shaving jacket material off of the high velocity 5.45x39mm projectile.

The most notable feature of the AK74 series weapons is the unique muzzle brake. Unlike standard muzzle brakes/flash suppressors which were attached to the threads on the muzzle, the AK74 muzzle brake is attached to the front sight base. The muzzle brake screws in place and is locked by a plunger pin on the front of the front sight base and it locked into a notch on the rear rim of the muzzle brake. There are two chambers in this design, one in front of the muzzle inside the muzzle brake and the other right outside the main body of the brake, connected by two bridges at 12 and 6 o’clock. The half moon brake was in production from 1974 until 1979. In 1979 the zigzag brake was introduced and was in production till 1983. This differed in that there were zigzag shaped slits on both right and left sides of the brake. This was more expensive to produce and was cut by an electro-discharge machine (EDM). The 3rd and current design of the muzzle brake is another two piece design and has two crescent shapes. This brake is much less expensive to manufacture due to not machining or laser cutting the slits. A baffle plate was pressed into the muzzle brake main body and the shapes were provided on each side of the baffle to allow high pressure gasses to vent from the muzzle brake. The bridges were made significantly stronger as well. This design muzzle brake not only reduced recoil but muzzle blast as well as noise levels. This muzzle brake was so effective that the recoil of the AK74 is reduced by nearly two-thirds of the 7.62x39mm AKM.

The muzzle brake removed from a Romanian AK74 rifle. Notice how the threads are part of the front sight base.

Around 1968, the Soviet Union began replacing the heavy steel magazines with a new lightweight fiber reinforced AG-4S phenol plastic being orange in color. Metal feed lips were molded into the plastic body. These magazines were primarily manufactured by Tula and Izhmash factories in Russia. Only prototype magazines in the Soviet Union were manufactured of steel. The production AK74 magazines would be made of the same material as the 7.62x39mm polymer magazines. It should be noted that steel magazines have been manufactured in large numbers by Romania and Poland. The Soviet magazines are equipped with two grooves on the rear of each side of the magazine which allow a stripper clip guide to be inserted. The ammunition was issued in 15-round stripper clips. The orange color tended to be problematic due to the way it stood out and also the way it could reflect light. The magazines were later manufactured in plum color and then finally black. The plastic magazines have a capacity of 30 rounds but also have a 45-round magazine for the RPK74 light support weapon. A magazine has also been developed which holds 60 rounds and stores the ammunition in 4 columns of 15 rounds. The polymer magazines have been manufactured in various colors by several countries. Bulgaria has manufactured them in brown.

Common Soviet/Russian 5.45 x39mm cartridges from left to right: Ball; Ball Subsonic; Ball 10% Over-Pressure (black); Ball 10% Over-Pressure (yellow); Ball Precision (100 meters) white tip; Tracer; Enhanced Penetration; Blank; Bulleted Blank and Dummy. Bottom of the picture is the underwater cartridge. (Photo courtesy of Woodin Lab/N.D. Hower)

The final design of the AK74 spawned a new rifle with an effective range nearly 2 to 2-1/2 times that of the AKM. The use of low impulse high velocity ammunition coupled with an excellent muzzle brake made a more accurate rifle as well as a more controllable automatic rifle. This all adds up to a more effective soldier. The soldier can carry double the ammunition for the same combat load of 5.45x39mm ammunition than the heavier 7.62x39mm ammunition.

The AK74 would not wait long to be combat tested as the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan on 27 December 1979. At this time the rifles were first being fielded. Western intelligence would learn of this new rifle from a Soldier of Fortune journalist Galen Geer in September of 1980. Initial intelligence reported that this cartridge was only in use by Soviet Special Forces and later that proved to be incorrect. The Soviet Union was completely replacing their entire 7.62x39mm fleet with the new AK74 family of weapons. The AK74 earned a reputation for its destructive wounding capability and was very respected and feared by the Mujahedeen. The rifle has gone on to be the standard Soviet infantry rifle to present day Russia.

Soviet military cartridges of the last century. The 7.62x54R (left), 7.62x39mm (center) and 5.45x39mm (right).

It was thought that the reign of the Kalashnikov rifles was coming to the end in 1994. In 1994 a new rifle was adopted to replace the Kalashnikov rifle called the AN94 or Avtomat Nikonova Model of 1994 designed by Gennadiy Nikonov. The AN94 is chambered in the M74 cartridge (5.45x39mm) and uses a new operating system known as blow back shifted pulse, a combination of gas and recoil operation. The rifle has selector settings for safe, semiautomatic, 2-shot burst and fully automatic. Due to the method of operation the rifle has two cyclic rates. The first two shots fire at 1,800 rounds per minute and subsequent rounds fire at 600 rounds per minute. The 1,800 round per minute 2 shot burst gives the shooter the feel of one impulse for two shots. When the rifle fires, the projectile is launched down the barrel and passes the gas port, gas is bled off into a gas port entering a gas block pushing the piston to the rear simultaneously the receiver/barrel moves rearward. When firing on automatic the first shot sets the receiver in motion as well as the bolt carrier cycles independently. A special cable and pulley mechanism loads the next round onto a special feed tray due to the fact the bolt never over travels the magazine. When the second round is fired the receiver comes to its full rearward position. For the third round and any continuous rounds in a single burst the barrel reciprocates once for each shot. When the trigger is released and pulled again the first two shot again fire at 1,800 rounds per minute and then down to 600 rounds per minute. The only parts in common with the AN94 and the AK74 are the pistol grip and the magazine. As advanced as this new rifle is, Russia has not been able to procure them in significant numbers and Russia is still taking shipments of the AK74M.

Hornady polymer tipped 5.45x39mm v-max projectile 52gr personal protection cartridge being fired into ballistic gelatin and the recovered impressive projectile. This is the first and as of this writing the only domestically produced 5.45x39mm round.

Krebs Custom AK74 Rifle

While doing some research on the AK74 for a foreign weapons training class for a deploying unit from the 10th Mountain Division to Afghanistan, I had a conversation with John Miller, who probably has forgotten more about military weapons than I will ever know. He told me I needed to talk to Mark Krebs, of Krebs Custom out of Wauconda, IL. With an endorsement from John, I did just that.

Shown on top is the condition of the SAIGA rifle as it is imported into the United States from Russia. Shown on the bottom is the finalized Krebs Custom rebuilt rifle. The rifle keeps it Russian receiver, hammer forged chrome lined barrel, bolt carrier group and other components. But the proper number of American made AK parts are added so the rifle is 922(r) compliant.

Krebs manufactures some of the finest and most advanced versions of the AKM/AK74 available anywhere to military as well as commercial customers in the United States. At first Marc Krebs started by doing “general gunsmithing.” After several years he shifted focus to specialize in building custom .45 1911 pistols. Even while working on these competition .45s (which, according to Marc, were always pushing the edge of reliability); Marc always respected the AK platform, and saw its potential. About 13-14 years ago, he shifted his focus to the AK platform. Although a small shop, Krebs Custom can manufacture approximately 600 weapons per year. These are each and every one custom manufactured from the bare receiver to the final inspection.

Typical profiles of Soviet infantry cartridges made by the Wound Ballistic Laboratory, U.S. Army Letterman Institute of Research. Note the unique airspace in the tip of the projectile. (Photo courtesy of Col. Martin Fackler)

The great majority of the firearms Krebs Custom produce start out as Russian Saiga sporting rifles and shotguns, usually purchased directly from the importer. The rifles are stripped to their barreled receivers and then “built out” and “blueprinted” from there. They use the Russian Saiga receivers, and the original Russian hammer-forged, chrome-lined barrels. The trigger guards are removed, modified, and then re-installed in the proper position. The rest of the rifle is built according to the particular model they want to produce. They re-crown the barrels, straighten & align the sights, and eliminate any magazine problems (when necessary). For 922(r) compliance they usually install three U.S.-made trigger parts (Tapco G-2 parts that they have re-machined to Krebs standards), use U.S.-made fore-end furniture and buttstocks, and Krebs U.S.-made AK-74-style muzzle brake. While being built, all of the sharp edges of the rifle are smoothed. After the rifles have been industrially tumbled, they are ready to be bead-blasted to bare metal. They are then carefully painted, using Krebs locally-made, industrial-grade, flat black synthetic alkyd paint. After being cured for 10 minutes, the parts are then baked for 30 minutes to harden the paint and bond it to the metal.

Russian proof marks as well as the Krebs Custom logo on the right side of the receiver.

Their most popular rifle configuration is their AK-103K which is a 7.62x39mm caliber rifle that has the outward appearance of an AK74. Although the 5.45x39mm caliber is very popular for Krebs (35%), the 7.62x39mm is by far more popular (65%). Krebs does do SAIGA shotguns as well and have the capability and is licensed to do selective fire weapons for law enforcement and military applications. They do not export any rifles or parts outside the continental United States with exception of State Department orders as well as orders to APO’s or FPO’s.

Markings on the left side of the Russian made receiver – notice the TAPCO American made trigger. The rifle comes with a scope mounting base as well.

Krebs rifles are not cheap commanding price tags from $1,200 up to $2,185. This author could fathom an AK-type rifle being more than $500 – and that would be high. That was until the box was opened. The test and evaluation rifle sent was a 5.45x39mm caliber catalog number 74 rifle. The rifle has excellent fit and finish and it is Russian. The rifle benefits by being mostly manufactured by the factory that built the first models of the AK74 back in the early 1970’s. All of the updated changes have been made on this rifle including the 90-degree gas port and smooth receiver cover. The hammer forged chrome lined barrel insures this rifle will have a long service life. The gas piston is the Russian military type with the two cuts removed. Several Russian proof marks are visible on the receiver along with Krebs logo. The proper Russian style front sight base is installed with an American made duplicate of the Russian muzzle brake. To satisfy 922(r) there are several American made parts including buttstock, pistol grip, handguards and trigger group.

Left side view of the Krebs Custom AK74 (semiautomatic), which is the closest one can get to a true Russian made rifle but with many enhancements making the rifle even better.
right side view of the Krebs Custom AK74.

Anyone familiar with AK-type rifles knows that the selector levers are loud and clunky: not this one. It has been hand tuned to be smooth and quiet. Inspection of the trigger mechanism showed clear signs of polishing to sear surfaces. The trigger pull was incredibly smooth. Not to heavy but just perfect for a combat rifle of high quality. There are no sharp edges to speak of. The rifle was blemish free and just plain tight. The bolt and carrier is Russian and extremely well made. The piston rod is held in place by a peening process rather than a pin which is another current Russian manufacturing process to speed up the production time and decrease cost without sacrificing quality and reliability.

The AN94 was to replace the AK74 in the Soviet Army. As innovative as the design is, the former Soviet Union cannot afford the AN94 and has continued to purchase AK74M rifles. The AN94 has seen service with Spetznaz as well as other specialized units.

The rifle was shot with ammunition provided by Wolf Ammunition. This was perfect ammunition for the rifle. The ammunition was 100% reliable and defiantly combat accurate. The 5.45x39mm ammunition had a steel fully jacketed projectile in a steel case. There was no primer/bullet sealant on this particular target shooting grade ammunition. That is available on the Wolf Classic Military line of ammunition. The rifle was tested with German, Russian and Bulgarian polymer magazines. In 700 rounds the rifle experienced no malfunctions and produced 2- to 3-inch groups consistently off of a sand bag at 100 yards. Unlike any of the other AKs I had available to me including Chinese and Romanian 7.62x39mm rifles, the Krebs AK74 had consistent 100% hits on a silhouette target at 300 yards. I had another AK74 to compare the Krebs rifle to as well – a customized Romanian AK74. Comparing the two was literally apples and oranges. Quality of the Krebs rifle significantly surpassed it. The Romanian rifle clearly had early Soviet characteristics including the early piston rod and ribbed receiver cover. The muzzle brake on the Romanian rifle was slimmer and longer and there were no “zigzag” vent holes in the face of the first chamber on the brake. The barrel was not nearly the quality of the Russian, however in actual firing the accuracy was nearly the same with the lead on the Krebs rifle.

This young Russian soldier is equipped with a modernized AK74M 40mm UBGL (under barrel grenade launcher) and IP29 4x optic.

The AK74 has and always will be an enhancement to the previous 7.62x39mm rifles. Accuracy is significantly enhanced due to a much flatter trajectory of the 5.45x39mm cartridge as well as the low recoil making it much more controllable on automatic fire. The high velocity projectile is more lethal than the heavier and much slower counterpart. Although debate will go on about the high velocity lethal round versus the brick busting slow heavy round, there is a rifle for whatever side you stand. However, there is no question of the lethality of the 5.45x39mm round, it proved itself terrifying to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan. The rifle also made the Soviet soldier more efficient on the individual as well as platoon level. More accurate, longer range, more lethal and lighter combat load than what they had before and if you believe the math, a more reliable rifle than the rifle they had – not that there ever was a reliability issue with an AK.

Shown are Soviet Naval Infantryman with AK74M rifles with bayonets mounted during demonstration on 10 September 1990 for the U.S. Navy at Vladivostok, Russia. (U.S. Navy Photo by PHCS Mitchell)

Krebs Custom puts out an AK for the serious AK aficionado as well as the soldier who likes the AK platform. Krebs continues to improve upon the system with better iron sight options, quad rails, improved selector/safety levers, excellent triggers, telescopic stocks and much more. Mark Krebs undoubtedly makes the finest AK this author has ever seen and I have seen hundreds of them from various countries over the years. As previously stated, this author could not imagine a $1,200 AK, but I did. I bought one for my personal collection replacing my Romanian AK74. It was worth every penny.

Krebs Custom President Mark Krebs holding one of his highly specialized and customized AK74 rifles. Krebs has definitely become a leading high quality and specialized AK manufacturor in the United States.
The SAIGA rifles are completely disassembled to the receiver and barrel and the trigger guard removed and moved to its proper location. Every Krebs Custom rifle is handmade/modified.
This article first appeared in Small Arms Review V16N1 (March 2012)
Tags: 2012Christopher R. BartocciMARCH 2012THE SOVIET AK74 & KREBS CUSTOM AK74 RIFLEV16N1
Previous Post

FUTURE INFANTRY SMALL ARMS

Next Post

LEW WETZEL: GE’S SECRET WEAPON, PART I

Next Post
LEW WETZEL: GE’S SECRET WEAPON, PART I

LEW WETZEL: GE'S SECRET WEAPON, PART I

TRENDING STORIES

  • VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    VALKYRIE ARMAMENT BELT-FED CONVERSION

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Complete Guide To Colt M-16 Models: Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Second Generation AR57: Drop-in 5.7 Upper For Your AR

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Forgotten M16A1 Rifle Manufacturers: GM/Hydra-Matic and Harrington & Richardson – Part I

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The New Light and Handy Ruger American Generation II Ranch Rifle

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

RECENT POSTS

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

SIG Sauer’s Full-Size Compact P365 “Fuse”

June 27, 2024
The Importance of Offhand Shooting

The Importance of Offhand Shooting

June 25, 2024
BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

BOOK REVIEW – The Collector’s Guide to the SKS

June 20, 2024
True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

True to Form: The Tisas 1911A1 ASF

June 18, 2024
Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

Setting the Record Straight on the Fedorov Avtomat

June 6, 2024

QUICK LINKS

  • About Chipotle Publishing
  • About Small Arms Review
  • Advertise with Us
  • Write for Us

CONTACT DETAILS

  • Phone: +1 (702) 565-0746
  • E-mail: office@smallarmsreview.com
  • Web: www.chipotlepublishing.com
  • Chipotle Publishing, LLC 631 N. Stephanie St., No. 282, Henderson, NV 89014
Small Arms Review

FOLLOW US

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist



No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Guns & Parts
    • Suppressors
    • Optics & Thermals
    • Ammunition
    • Gear
    • News & Opinion
    • Columns
    • Museums & Factory Tours
    • ID Guides
    • Interviews
    • Event Coverage
    • Articles by Issue
      • Volume 1
      • Volume 2
      • Volume 3
      • Volume 4
      • Volume 5
      • Volume 6
      • Volume 7
      • Volume 8
      • Volume 9
      • Volume 10
      • Volume 11
      • Volume 12
      • Volume 13
      • Volume 14
      • Volume 15
      • Volume 16
      • Volume 17
      • Volume 18
      • Volume 19
      • Volume 20
      • Volume 21
      • Volume 22
      • Volume 23
      • Volume 24
  • The Archive
    • Search The Archive
  • Store
    • Books
    • Back Issues
    • Merchandise
  • Events
  • About
    • About Small Arms Review
    • About Chipotle Publishing
    • Contact Us
    • Other Publications
      • Small Arms Defense Journal

© 2022 Chipotle Publishing | All Rights Reserved

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Are you in the know?
Stay up to date with the latest articles.

Facebook-f Linkedin Instagram

Redirecting to External Website

You are leaving the Small Arms Review website and will be redirected to an external link in a 5 Seconds.
VISIT NOW!